{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/checkstyle/checkstyle/issues/2847","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/checkstyle/checkstyle/issues/2847/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/checkstyle/checkstyle/issues/2847/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/checkstyle/checkstyle/issues/2847/events","html_url":"https://github.com/checkstyle/checkstyle/pull/2847","id":128677435,"number":2847,"title":"Issue 2806","user":{"login":"rnveach","id":5427943,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/5427943?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/rnveach","html_url":"https://github.com/rnveach","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/rnveach/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/rnveach/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/rnveach/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/rnveach/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/rnveach/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/rnveach/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/rnveach/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/rnveach/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/rnveach/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"closed","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":4,"created_at":"2016-01-25T23:56:02Z","updated_at":"2016-01-28T13:25:24Z","closed_at":"2016-01-28T13:25:24Z","pull_request":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/checkstyle/checkstyle/pulls/2847","html_url":"https://github.com/checkstyle/checkstyle/pull/2847","diff_url":"https://github.com/checkstyle/checkstyle/pull/2847.diff","patch_url":"https://github.com/checkstyle/checkstyle/pull/2847.patch"},"body":"Like issue, the number of lines and annotation checks were moved to only if the javadoc is missing. If it is found, then it will always be validated.\r\nNot sure if the method name `isContentsAllowMissingJavadoc` is the best, but it is all that I can think of for right now.\r\nSecond commit fixes all violations in CS' source. I just added the missing params/tags and didn't remove any javadocs."},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/checkstyle/checkstyle/issues/comments/176184553","html_url":"https://github.com/checkstyle/checkstyle/pull/2847#issuecomment-176184553","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/checkstyle/checkstyle/issues/2847","id":176184553,"user":{"login":"romani","id":812984,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/812984?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/romani","html_url":"https://github.com/romani","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/romani/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/romani/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/romani/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/romani/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/romani/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/romani/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/romani/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/romani/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/romani/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2016-01-28T13:25:24Z","updated_at":"2016-01-28T13:25:24Z","body":"thanks a lot for testing on your project.\r\n\r\nmerged as FF."}}