{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/neo4j/neo4j-browser/issues/283","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/neo4j/neo4j-browser","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/neo4j/neo4j-browser/issues/283/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/neo4j/neo4j-browser/issues/283/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/neo4j/neo4j-browser/issues/283/events","html_url":"https://github.com/neo4j/neo4j-browser/issues/283","id":182728533,"number":283,"title":"Feature Request: Offline graph simulation","user":{"login":"chris-cheshire","id":2357039,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/2357039?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/chris-cheshire","html_url":"https://github.com/chris-cheshire","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/chris-cheshire/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/chris-cheshire/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/chris-cheshire/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/chris-cheshire/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/chris-cheshire/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/chris-cheshire/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/chris-cheshire/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/chris-cheshire/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/chris-cheshire/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"assignees":[],"milestone":null,"comments":2,"created_at":"2016-10-13T08:40:40Z","updated_at":"2016-10-14T12:26:13Z","closed_at":null,"body":"For very large graphs could there be an option where the graph ticks are calculated without moving the nodes? The final node positions only shown shown when the alpha value has cooled enough the graph is stable. This gives large performance improvements when calculating large graphs and reduces the time to generate the graph considerably."},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/neo4j/neo4j-browser/issues/comments/253785773","html_url":"https://github.com/neo4j/neo4j-browser/issues/283#issuecomment-253785773","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/neo4j/neo4j-browser/issues/283","id":253785773,"user":{"login":"cgreene","id":542643,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/542643?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/cgreene","html_url":"https://github.com/cgreene","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/cgreene/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/cgreene/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/cgreene/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/cgreene/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/cgreene/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/cgreene/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/cgreene/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/cgreene/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/cgreene/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2016-10-14T12:26:13Z","updated_at":"2016-10-14T12:26:13Z","body":"If you're willing to wait until it's totally fixed, this seems like it's feasible in d3:\r\n\r\nhttp://bl.ocks.org/mbostock/1667139"}}
{"actor":{"display_login":"cgreene"}}