{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ircv3/ircv3-specifications/issues/215","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ircv3/ircv3-specifications","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ircv3/ircv3-specifications/issues/215/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ircv3/ircv3-specifications/issues/215/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ircv3/ircv3-specifications/issues/215/events","html_url":"https://github.com/ircv3/ircv3-specifications/pull/215","id":132297169,"number":215,"title":"[meta] Contributing document and process","user":{"login":"DanielOaks","id":251281,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/251281?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/DanielOaks","html_url":"https://github.com/DanielOaks","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/DanielOaks/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/DanielOaks/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/DanielOaks/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/DanielOaks/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/DanielOaks/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/DanielOaks/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/DanielOaks/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/DanielOaks/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/DanielOaks/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":7,"created_at":"2016-02-09T00:28:08Z","updated_at":"2016-02-09T11:21:32Z","closed_at":null,"pull_request":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ircv3/ircv3-specifications/pulls/215","html_url":"https://github.com/ircv3/ircv3-specifications/pull/215","diff_url":"https://github.com/ircv3/ircv3-specifications/pull/215.diff","patch_url":"https://github.com/ircv3/ircv3-specifications/pull/215.patch"},"body":"This document lays out my thoughts for a process similar to the one specified in #213, including the proposed `IRCv3/ideas` repository.\r\n\r\nThis sort of a process would come with a tightening-up of the process for becoming a stakeholder. I think something along these lines should help us produce better specifications and help the members of the IRCv3 WG better spend their time and effort where they want to, without having to pay attention to every single issue or feature request brought up by everyone if they don't want to.\r\n\r\nAdditionally, this would come with the creation of the `IRCv3/ideas` repository, which is something we can spec up if we decide moving in this direction is a good idea.\r\n\r\nFormatted version of this document can be found [here](https://github.com/DanielOaks/ircv3-specifications/blob/contributing/CONTRIBUTING.md)."},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ircv3/ircv3-specifications/issues/comments/181823141","html_url":"https://github.com/ircv3/ircv3-specifications/pull/215#issuecomment-181823141","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ircv3/ircv3-specifications/issues/215","id":181823141,"user":{"login":"jwheare","id":49224,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/49224?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/jwheare","html_url":"https://github.com/jwheare","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jwheare/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jwheare/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jwheare/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jwheare/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jwheare/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jwheare/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jwheare/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jwheare/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jwheare/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2016-02-09T11:21:31Z","updated_at":"2016-02-09T11:21:31Z","body":"I'm a little bit conflicted about vendor prefixes. In some cases they useful without a doubt, e.g. a spec that is only applicable to a specific vendor, but I have mixed feelings about them in other circumstances, e.g. CSS and X-prefixed http headers. I don't feel like there is a correct rule on them either way. Sometimes they're useful, sometimes not, for a variety of reasons. It should really depend on the specification whether a prefix is required or recommended, and not a general rule."}}