{"action":"opened","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/g4v4g4i/ArgABM/issues/8","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/g4v4g4i/ArgABM","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/g4v4g4i/ArgABM/issues/8/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/g4v4g4i/ArgABM/issues/8/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/g4v4g4i/ArgABM/issues/8/events","html_url":"https://github.com/g4v4g4i/ArgABM/issues/8","id":180339734,"number":8,"title":"Evaluation and admissibility","user":{"login":"g4v4g4i","id":7464303,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/7464303?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/g4v4g4i","html_url":"https://github.com/g4v4g4i","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/g4v4g4i/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/g4v4g4i/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/g4v4g4i/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/g4v4g4i/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/g4v4g4i/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/g4v4g4i/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/g4v4g4i/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/g4v4g4i/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/g4v4g4i/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/g4v4g4i/ArgABM/labels/enhancement","name":"enhancement","color":"84b6eb"}],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"assignees":[],"milestone":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/g4v4g4i/ArgABM/milestones/2","html_url":"https://github.com/g4v4g4i/ArgABM/milestones/The%20prospective%20work%20week","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/g4v4g4i/ArgABM/milestones/2/labels","id":2040356,"number":2,"title":"The prospective work week","description":"- implement strengthened prospective behavior\r\n- rethink the work week\r\n- Dunja: what else?","creator":{"login":"g4v4g4i","id":7464303,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/7464303?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/g4v4g4i","html_url":"https://github.com/g4v4g4i","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/g4v4g4i/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/g4v4g4i/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/g4v4g4i/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/g4v4g4i/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/g4v4g4i/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/g4v4g4i/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/g4v4g4i/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/g4v4g4i/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/g4v4g4i/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"open_issues":5,"closed_issues":0,"state":"open","created_at":"2016-09-30T15:41:19Z","updated_at":"2016-09-30T15:56:10Z","due_on":"2016-10-16T00:00:00Z","closed_at":null},"comments":0,"created_at":"2016-09-30T15:56:10Z","updated_at":"2016-09-30T15:56:10Z","closed_at":null,"body":"Currently the evaluation rates theories as follows:\r\nT1 > T2 iff T1 has more defended arguments than T2.\r\n\r\nAlternatively we could think about calculating this relative to the size of the theory.\r\n\r\nOption 1:\r\nT1 > T2 iff |defended-args(T1)| / |discovered-args(T1)| > |defended-args(T2)| / |discovered-args(T2)|\r\n\r\nOption 2:\r\nT1 > T2 iff |non-defended-args(T1)| / |discovered-args(T1)| < |non-defended-args(T2)| / |discovered-args(T2)|\r\n\r\nOption 3: hybrid between option 1 and option 2.\r\n\r\nI would suggest to implement three procedures in behavior.nls and an option in the interface to choose."}}
{"actor":{"display_login":"g4v4g4i"}}