{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/OIEau/uwwtd/issues/241","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/OIEau/uwwtd","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/OIEau/uwwtd/issues/241/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/OIEau/uwwtd/issues/241/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/OIEau/uwwtd/issues/241/events","html_url":"https://github.com/OIEau/uwwtd/issues/241","id":180337751,"number":241,"title":"Bulgaria compliance","user":{"login":"Rakedjian","id":16286544,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/16286544?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/Rakedjian","html_url":"https://github.com/Rakedjian","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Rakedjian/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Rakedjian/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Rakedjian/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Rakedjian/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Rakedjian/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Rakedjian/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Rakedjian/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Rakedjian/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Rakedjian/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"assignees":[],"milestone":null,"comments":2,"created_at":"2016-09-30T15:48:31Z","updated_at":"2016-10-03T07:27:11Z","closed_at":null,"body":"In 2012 this agglomeration was declared compliance. It is not possible because it the same picture the secondary treatment is not compliant. It is under pending deadline but if Article 3 is Ok and Article 4 is not ok it is not possible to have global compliance Ok. It has to be considered as not relevant. \r\n\r\nhttp://webnuxdev.rnde.tm.fr/uwwtd_bg/agglomeration/bgag6963300/2012"},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/OIEau/uwwtd/issues/comments/251042796","html_url":"https://github.com/OIEau/uwwtd/issues/241#issuecomment-251042796","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/OIEau/uwwtd/issues/241","id":251042796,"user":{"login":"Rakedjian","id":16286544,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/16286544?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/Rakedjian","html_url":"https://github.com/Rakedjian","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Rakedjian/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Rakedjian/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Rakedjian/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Rakedjian/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Rakedjian/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Rakedjian/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Rakedjian/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Rakedjian/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Rakedjian/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2016-10-03T07:27:11Z","updated_at":"2016-10-03T07:27:11Z","body":"I don't undestand this remark.\r\nAn agglomeration has to be displayed as compliant only if the calculation shows that it already meets the requirements of the directive no matter the deadline. How can we consider a connection to  a collecting system without correct treatment as a compliant situation.\r\n"}}
{"actor":{"display_login":"Rakedjian"}}