{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/own-pt/openWordnet-PT/issues/96","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/own-pt/openWordnet-PT/issues/96/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/own-pt/openWordnet-PT/issues/96/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/own-pt/openWordnet-PT/issues/96/events","html_url":"https://github.com/own-pt/openWordnet-PT/issues/96","id":127591677,"number":96,"title":"NomLex should be connected, but independent from OWN-PT.","user":{"login":"vcvpaiva","id":1154463,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/1154463?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/vcvpaiva","html_url":"https://github.com/vcvpaiva","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/vcvpaiva/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/vcvpaiva/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/vcvpaiva/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/vcvpaiva/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/vcvpaiva/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/vcvpaiva/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/vcvpaiva/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/vcvpaiva/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/vcvpaiva/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":3,"created_at":"2016-01-20T02:45:33Z","updated_at":"2016-01-26T18:11:39Z","closed_at":null,"body":"Bringing up  the discussion here. Livy and I created the original NomLex-PT as a small hand-coded resource. It is good to have it connected to the OpenWordNet-PT, its bigger sister, but the data should be downloadable on its own and  there should be an interface to correct it and improve it, independently from OWN-PT. This is the promise of the Open Linked Data, the fact that one can carry one with resources only vaguely aligned.\r\n.\r\nSome of the resources in the Portal da Lingua Portuguesa could  be used for that, like the quality nouns."},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/own-pt/openWordnet-PT/issues/comments/175149065","html_url":"https://github.com/own-pt/openWordnet-PT/issues/96#issuecomment-175149065","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/own-pt/openWordnet-PT/issues/96","id":175149065,"user":{"login":"arademaker","id":86403,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/86403?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/arademaker","html_url":"https://github.com/arademaker","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/arademaker/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/arademaker/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/arademaker/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/arademaker/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/arademaker/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/arademaker/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/arademaker/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/arademaker/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/arademaker/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2016-01-26T18:11:38Z","updated_at":"2016-01-26T18:11:38Z","body":"\n> On Jan 26, 2016, at 3:15 PM, Valeria de Paiva <notifications@github.com> wrote:\n> Nao sao nao, os moprhossemantic links sao so' algumas das nominalizacoes, nao sao todas que queremos.\n\nA modelagem é a mesma, link entre senses. Este é meu ponto principal.\n\n> a classificacao deles tambem nao 'e necessariamente a que queremos.\n\nIdem.\n\n> e no momento eles nao estao funcionando muito bem, no meu entender.\n> os morphossemanitc links nos dao muitas sugestoes boas, mas e' esperado que muitdas dessas sugestoes nao funcionem pro portugues.\n\nExistem 2 discussões separadas aqui. Uma o que são os morpholinks/nominalizações, outra é como as entradas foram produzidas e como podem ser melhoradas.\n\n> nao temos nenhuma razao a priori pra acreditar que todos ou mesmo a maior parte dos morphossemantic links funcionem em portugues.\n\nOK.\n\n> enqto que o nomlex tem o problema oposto, os pares devem (na maioria, a menos de erro humano) estarem corretos, mas seu encaixe na rede PWN nao 'e garantido.\n> ('e por isso que estamos criando o arquivo complicado dos chamados \"synset candidates\".)\n\nPor que faltam senses para PT? Então criamos synsets, correto.\n> a possibilildade de download pode ser que esteja mais facil, mas se sim por que nao faze-lo facil pro consumidor? nesse caso estou pensando nos nossos usarios que sao linguistas. mas a possibilidade de consertar o nomlex enquanto nomlex devia ser oferecida tambem e nao e'. na minha opiniao essa 'e uma melhoria essencial.\n> \nNa medida do possivel, quando tivermos tempo e recurso.\n\n"}}