{"action":"opened","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/tulip-control/tulip-control/issues/158","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/tulip-control/tulip-control","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/tulip-control/tulip-control/issues/158/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/tulip-control/tulip-control/issues/158/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/tulip-control/tulip-control/issues/158/events","html_url":"https://github.com/tulip-control/tulip-control/issues/158","id":168329553,"number":158,"title":"deprecate and eventually delete `interfaces.jtlv`","user":{"login":"slivingston","id":355654,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/355654?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/slivingston","html_url":"https://github.com/slivingston","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/slivingston/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/slivingston/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/slivingston/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/slivingston/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/slivingston/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/slivingston/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/slivingston/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/slivingston/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/slivingston/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"assignees":[],"milestone":null,"comments":0,"created_at":"2016-07-29T13:52:09Z","updated_at":"2016-07-29T13:52:09Z","closed_at":null,"body":"As far as I know, there are no current users of the JTLV-based solver interface, and no one wants to maintain it because the performance, features, etc. are available and better elsewhere. As such, we should deprecate and, later, delete `interfaces.jtlv` and any other uses of the JTLV-based solver in TuLiP.\r\n\r\nAnyone interested in keeping it should comment here. Besides technical arguments about using the solver itself, other motivations can include the existence of legacy code and interesting use-cases that indirectly involve JTLV."}}
{"actor":{"display_login":"slivingston"}}