{"action":"opened","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/daducci/AMICO/issues/26","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/daducci/AMICO","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/daducci/AMICO/issues/26/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/daducci/AMICO/issues/26/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/daducci/AMICO/issues/26/events","html_url":"https://github.com/daducci/AMICO/issues/26","id":158435220,"number":26,"title":"value discretization","user":{"login":"steelec","id":2734273,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/2734273?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/steelec","html_url":"https://github.com/steelec","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/steelec/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/steelec/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/steelec/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/steelec/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/steelec/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/steelec/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/steelec/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/steelec/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/steelec/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":0,"created_at":"2016-06-03T19:14:47Z","updated_at":"2016-06-03T19:14:47Z","closed_at":null,"body":"Has anyone had any luck with tracking this discretization issue down and/or determined if there is a way to solve it with post-processing? I included my original post in @goals2008 thread. There was mention that @ejcanalesr might have a fix. I am happy to help out and/or test.\r\n\r\nCheers,\r\nChris\r\n\r\n--- original post with linked images -- \r\nI have run into the same issue with discretization in the ICVF and ODI (running the python version of AMICO). Has there been any progress on optimal paramteres or the method by @ejcanalesr?\r\nChris\r\nScreenshot of AMICO calculated OD versus that calculated by the original (non-AMICO) NODDI matlab toolbox. The discretizations appear at values very close to .19,.29,.39...\r\nscreenshot from 2016-04-06 20 23 42\r\nhttps://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/2734273/14360361/fe956950-fcc3-11e5-8e52-012a451fa7eb.png\r\n\r\nsame comparison, with mean gaussian smoothing of the AMICO OD ouptut, kernel size from left to right = 0.75, 1, 2mm (data resolution = 2x2x2)\r\n\r\nscreenshot from 2016-04-07 13 40 22\r\nhttps://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/2734273/14360997/db57131e-fcc6-11e5-8475-1c6277c708b0.png"}}
{"actor":{"display_login":"steelec"}}