{"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/modocache/swift-corelibs-xctest/comments/15346409","html_url":"https://github.com/modocache/swift-corelibs-xctest/commit/eed9cdba08f0e06f5b752bc5b505ac8b91a468b7#commitcomment-15346409","id":15346409,"user":{"login":"ddunbar","id":106625,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/106625?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/ddunbar","html_url":"https://github.com/ddunbar","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ddunbar/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ddunbar/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ddunbar/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ddunbar/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ddunbar/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ddunbar/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ddunbar/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ddunbar/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ddunbar/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"position":55,"line":55,"path":"Tests/Functional/lit.cfg","commit_id":"eed9cdba08f0e06f5b752bc5b505ac8b91a468b7","created_at":"2016-01-08T18:58:24Z","updated_at":"2016-01-08T18:58:24Z","body":"Can we use %{swiftc} (etc.) as the substitutions? I have generally been doing this for all new lit test suites I create, and I think it is more readable and maintainable over time, this prevents ambiguities when starting to use substitutions which are part of other arguments, and may be something lit should move to requiring at some point."}}