{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/wg14-cplex/epp/issues/20","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/wg14-cplex/epp/issues/20/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/wg14-cplex/epp/issues/20/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/wg14-cplex/epp/issues/20/events","html_url":"https://github.com/wg14-cplex/epp/issues/20","id":122151573,"number":20,"title":"The _Capture keyword should be renamed","user":{"login":"phalpern","id":984419,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/984419?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/phalpern","html_url":"https://github.com/phalpern","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/phalpern/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/phalpern/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/phalpern/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/phalpern/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/phalpern/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/phalpern/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/phalpern/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/phalpern/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/phalpern/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":1,"created_at":"2015-12-14T22:57:59Z","updated_at":"2016-01-05T00:18:07Z","closed_at":null,"body":"The keyword `_Capture` implies a general closure, which is not what the CPLEX WP describes.  We should consider a different keyword so that we don't interfere with the definition of a real closure facility later.\r\n\r\nSome possibilities:\r\n\r\n * `_Firstprivate`  -- this is the term used by OpenMP.  I hate it, but it has precedence.\r\n * `_Private` -- I don't this one, either, because it has too many incorrect implications.\r\n * `_Local`\r\n * `_Copy`\r\n * `_LocalCopy` -- This might be the most descriptive of what is actually going on, but I worry that we might want to add syntax later for non-copy local renaming of variables and might not want to introduce a new keyword.\r\n"},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/wg14-cplex/epp/issues/comments/168851806","html_url":"https://github.com/wg14-cplex/epp/issues/20#issuecomment-168851806","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/wg14-cplex/epp/issues/20","id":168851806,"user":{"login":"nelsc","id":4521122,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/4521122?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/nelsc","html_url":"https://github.com/nelsc","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/nelsc/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/nelsc/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/nelsc/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/nelsc/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/nelsc/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/nelsc/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/nelsc/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/nelsc/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/nelsc/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2016-01-05T00:18:07Z","updated_at":"2016-01-05T00:18:07Z","body":"In a CPLEX straw poll, the preference was evenly split between \"_LocalCopy\" and \"_CopyIn\"; no alternative had any support (not even \"_Capture\" or \"_Firstprivate\")."}}