{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/amiaopensource/ffmprovisr/issues/72","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/amiaopensource/ffmprovisr","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/amiaopensource/ffmprovisr/issues/72/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/amiaopensource/ffmprovisr/issues/72/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/amiaopensource/ffmprovisr/issues/72/events","html_url":"https://github.com/amiaopensource/ffmprovisr/issues/72","id":164653341,"number":72,"title":"Interlaced ProRes","user":{"login":"retokromer","id":3246607,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/3246607?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/retokromer","html_url":"https://github.com/retokromer","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/retokromer/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/retokromer/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/retokromer/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/retokromer/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/retokromer/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/retokromer/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/retokromer/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/retokromer/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/retokromer/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"assignees":[],"milestone":null,"comments":2,"created_at":"2016-07-09T06:39:25Z","updated_at":"2016-07-09T12:30:23Z","closed_at":null,"body":"At a some point, I guess, we should also consider an example of interlaced ProRes."},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/amiaopensource/ffmprovisr/issues/comments/231532160","html_url":"https://github.com/amiaopensource/ffmprovisr/issues/72#issuecomment-231532160","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/amiaopensource/ffmprovisr/issues/72","id":231532160,"user":{"login":"retokromer","id":3246607,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/3246607?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/retokromer","html_url":"https://github.com/retokromer","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/retokromer/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/retokromer/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/retokromer/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/retokromer/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/retokromer/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/retokromer/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/retokromer/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/retokromer/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/retokromer/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2016-07-09T12:30:23Z","updated_at":"2016-07-09T12:30:23Z","body":"If I remember correctly, the `-c:v prores_ks` is only good for interlaced, but for progressive it's slower as `-c:v prores`. Therefore we should use `prores` for progressive \"as default\" and `prores_ks` only for interlaced. I also guess that ProRes produced today should be progressive, but for legacy we need indeed to deal with interlaced. Please correct me if I am wrong."}}
{"actor":{"display_login":"retokromer"}}