{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/eslint/eslint/issues/5940","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/eslint/eslint","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/eslint/eslint/issues/5940/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/eslint/eslint/issues/5940/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/eslint/eslint/issues/5940/events","html_url":"https://github.com/eslint/eslint/pull/5940","id":150521562,"number":5940,"title":"Update: Check indentation for multi-line chained properties (refs #1801)","user":{"login":"Trott","id":718899,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/718899?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/Trott","html_url":"https://github.com/Trott","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Trott/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Trott/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Trott/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Trott/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Trott/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Trott/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Trott/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Trott/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Trott/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/eslint/eslint/labels/CLA:%20Valid","name":"CLA: Valid","color":"007700"}],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":36,"created_at":"2016-04-23T06:01:42Z","updated_at":"2016-06-03T16:38:20Z","closed_at":null,"pull_request":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/eslint/eslint/pulls/5940","html_url":"https://github.com/eslint/eslint/pull/5940","diff_url":"https://github.com/eslint/eslint/pull/5940.diff","patch_url":"https://github.com/eslint/eslint/pull/5940.patch"},"body":"The end user can choose whether and how much to indent.\r\n\r\n```js\r\nfoo()\r\n.bar\r\n.baz()\r\n```\r\n\r\nvs.\r\n\r\n```js\r\nfoo()\r\n  .bar\r\n  .baz()\r\n```\r\n\r\nand so forth..."},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/eslint/eslint/issues/comments/223629232","html_url":"https://github.com/eslint/eslint/pull/5940#issuecomment-223629232","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/eslint/eslint/issues/5940","id":223629232,"user":{"login":"nzakas","id":38546,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/38546?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/nzakas","html_url":"https://github.com/nzakas","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/nzakas/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/nzakas/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/nzakas/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/nzakas/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/nzakas/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/nzakas/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/nzakas/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/nzakas/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/nzakas/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2016-06-03T16:38:20Z","updated_at":"2016-06-03T16:38:20Z","body":"> The plan is make the other options follow the same, better new option scheme (with backwards compatibility) if you agree. Reason is they still suffer from the same problem (think about VariableDeclaration).\r\n\r\nThis seems like a very confusing incremental step towards that. If that's your goal, then I think we should start with a new issue describing all the changes you want to make. I don't like the idea of using this task as a backdoor for significant changes to this rule."}}
{"actor":{"display_login":"nzakas"}}