{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/cgrandin/hake-assessment/issues/36","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/cgrandin/hake-assessment","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/cgrandin/hake-assessment/issues/36/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/cgrandin/hake-assessment/issues/36/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/cgrandin/hake-assessment/issues/36/events","html_url":"https://github.com/cgrandin/hake-assessment/issues/36","id":131107838,"number":36,"title":"age 1 MSE simulations","user":{"login":"minnowslayer","id":16313572,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/16313572?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/minnowslayer","html_url":"https://github.com/minnowslayer","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/minnowslayer/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/minnowslayer/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/minnowslayer/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/minnowslayer/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/minnowslayer/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/minnowslayer/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/minnowslayer/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/minnowslayer/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/minnowslayer/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":6,"created_at":"2016-02-03T18:09:44Z","updated_at":"2016-02-03T20:45:51Z","closed_at":null,"body":"Hi all - what do we want to do about including the closed-loop simulation results on the performance of an age 1 index that we presented to the JMC last May? Will this be an additional appendix?\r\n\r\nOtherwise, since it's an area that nobody is currently editing, I could write a quick summary describing that little progress was made by the JTC on operating model develoment due to workload and other committments; but that there is the development of a spatial operating model occurring at UBC that we think will be useful for future analyses. I can put this in the UNRESOLVED PROBLEMS AND MAJOR UNCERTAINTIES section.\r\n\r\nN."},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/cgrandin/hake-assessment/issues/comments/179456414","html_url":"https://github.com/cgrandin/hake-assessment/issues/36#issuecomment-179456414","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/cgrandin/hake-assessment/issues/36","id":179456414,"user":{"login":"allan-hicks","id":9090770,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/9090770?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/allan-hicks","html_url":"https://github.com/allan-hicks","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/allan-hicks/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/allan-hicks/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/allan-hicks/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/allan-hicks/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/allan-hicks/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/allan-hicks/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/allan-hicks/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/allan-hicks/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/allan-hicks/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2016-02-03T20:45:51Z","updated_at":"2016-02-03T20:45:51Z","body":"Sounds good to me.\n\nOn Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 11:14 AM, minnowslayer <notifications@github.com>\nwrote:\n\n> I was going to write something like the following:\n>\n> Due to other assessment commitments, the JTC made modest progress on MSE\n> development. We presented the closed-loop simulations evaluating the effect\n> of including potential age 1 indices that were not yet complete in February\n> 2015 at the May 6-7 JMC meeting in Victoria, B.C. The simulations showed\n> that: introduction of age-1 survey results in lower catch, lower P(<B10\n> $%$) and a lower AAV but that comparable results in terms of catch and\n> could be achieved using higher precision of age-2+ survey or alternative\n> harvest control rules; the simulations assumed that an age-1 survey design\n> with consistent, effective, and numerous sampling was used. In addition,\n> the JTC has been communicating with a Ph.D. student at the University of\n> British Columbia that has built a spatial operating model for Pacific hake:\n> she presented her spatial operating model at the JTC’s December 2015\n> meeting; once her simulation analysis using it is complete and the results\n> published, it could be a useful tool for the Pacific hake MSE.\n>\n> But i think a separate document might be easier. Including some\n> description of the results that I have above invites presenting the full\n> set of results which i don't think we want. Perhaps we could flag this as a\n> discussion for tomorrow's call?\n>\n> —\n> Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub\n> <https://github.com/cgrandin/hake-assessment/issues/36#issuecomment-179409738>\n> .\n>\n"}}