{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/solson/miri/issues/18","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/solson/miri","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/solson/miri/issues/18/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/solson/miri/issues/18/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/solson/miri/issues/18/events","html_url":"https://github.com/solson/miri/pull/18","id":157956909,"number":18,"title":"Hold the state","user":{"login":"oli-obk","id":332036,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/332036?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/oli-obk","html_url":"https://github.com/oli-obk","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/oli-obk/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/oli-obk/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/oli-obk/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/oli-obk/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/oli-obk/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/oli-obk/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/oli-obk/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/oli-obk/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/oli-obk/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":21,"created_at":"2016-06-01T16:57:16Z","updated_at":"2016-06-09T08:55:47Z","closed_at":null,"pull_request":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/solson/miri/pulls/18","html_url":"https://github.com/solson/miri/pull/18","diff_url":"https://github.com/solson/miri/pull/18.diff","patch_url":"https://github.com/solson/miri/pull/18.patch"},"body":"precursor to #14\r\n\r\nok... iterator style was much easier than anticipated... The current design would require streaming iterators though...\r\n\r\nBasically it returns the statement or the terminator that is going to be interpreted *next*. Then it actually interprets that at the next `step` call and returns the statement after that."},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/solson/miri/issues/comments/224837511","html_url":"https://github.com/solson/miri/pull/18#issuecomment-224837511","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/solson/miri/issues/18","id":224837511,"user":{"login":"oli-obk","id":332036,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/332036?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/oli-obk","html_url":"https://github.com/oli-obk","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/oli-obk/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/oli-obk/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/oli-obk/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/oli-obk/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/oli-obk/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/oli-obk/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/oli-obk/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/oli-obk/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/oli-obk/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2016-06-09T08:55:47Z","updated_at":"2016-06-09T08:55:47Z","body":"> What if we inlined the trace! calls into Stepper and only had to worry about done? Could it get simplified down and not require the closures?\r\n\r\ndone.\r\n\r\n> My main concern now is the Mir cloning I mentioned in #18 (comment).\r\n\r\nWe can cache it to ensure that the cloning only ever happens once for every promoted."}}
{"actor":{"display_login":"oli-obk"}}