{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/AndrewRadev/sideways.vim/issues/13","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/AndrewRadev/sideways.vim","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/AndrewRadev/sideways.vim/issues/13/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/AndrewRadev/sideways.vim/issues/13/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/AndrewRadev/sideways.vim/issues/13/events","html_url":"https://github.com/AndrewRadev/sideways.vim/issues/13","id":91583089,"number":13,"title":"Moving conditionals around","user":{"login":"moll","id":156837,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/156837?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/moll","html_url":"https://github.com/moll","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/moll/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/moll/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/moll/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/moll/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/moll/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/moll/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/moll/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/moll/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/moll/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"assignees":[],"milestone":null,"comments":2,"created_at":"2015-06-28T10:27:49Z","updated_at":"2016-07-13T09:29:06Z","closed_at":null,"body":"Lo again,\r\n\r\nI've quite often found myself wanting to move conditionals around. They're parse very similarly to function arguments, but are delimited by `&&` and `||` rather than commas. You reckon it's possible to get Sideways.vim working with those too?\r\n\r\nMerci in advance!"},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/AndrewRadev/sideways.vim/issues/comments/232304597","html_url":"https://github.com/AndrewRadev/sideways.vim/issues/13#issuecomment-232304597","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/AndrewRadev/sideways.vim/issues/13","id":232304597,"user":{"login":"hgiesel","id":7188844,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/7188844?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/hgiesel","html_url":"https://github.com/hgiesel","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/hgiesel/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/hgiesel/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/hgiesel/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/hgiesel/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/hgiesel/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/hgiesel/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/hgiesel/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/hgiesel/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/hgiesel/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2016-07-13T09:29:06Z","updated_at":"2016-07-13T09:29:06Z","body":"I don't this should be implemented `foo && bar` and `bar && foo` are functionally equivalent, so there is no point."}}
{"actor":{"display_login":"hgiesel"}}