{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/pandegroup/openmm/issues/1426","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/pandegroup/openmm","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/pandegroup/openmm/issues/1426/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/pandegroup/openmm/issues/1426/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/pandegroup/openmm/issues/1426/events","html_url":"https://github.com/pandegroup/openmm/issues/1426","id":141954235,"number":1426,"title":"Final changes for 7.0","user":{"login":"peastman","id":4379786,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/4379786?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/peastman","html_url":"https://github.com/peastman","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/peastman/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/peastman/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/peastman/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/peastman/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/peastman/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/peastman/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/peastman/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/peastman/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/peastman/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":58,"created_at":"2016-03-18T19:12:18Z","updated_at":"2016-03-30T22:55:21Z","closed_at":null,"body":"I think we're getting close to being ready to build a release candidate of 7.0.  I've been going through the tracker looking for anything that still needs to be resolved, and there's not much left.  But I'd like to have everything in one place.  So if there's anything you think still needs to be fixed for 7.0, please post it here."},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/pandegroup/openmm/issues/comments/203673332","html_url":"https://github.com/pandegroup/openmm/issues/1426#issuecomment-203673332","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/pandegroup/openmm/issues/1426","id":203673332,"user":{"login":"jchodera","id":3656088,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/3656088?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/jchodera","html_url":"https://github.com/jchodera","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jchodera/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jchodera/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jchodera/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jchodera/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jchodera/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jchodera/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jchodera/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jchodera/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jchodera/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2016-03-30T22:55:21Z","updated_at":"2016-03-30T22:55:21Z","body":"> @jchodera regarding comment on step 7, the release candidates will all have conda version string \"7.0\" (no rc).\r\n\r\nSure, but they'd still have all the git hash commit stuff.\r\n\r\n> I still don't see that as a serious problem. :)\r\n> Maybe we should remove the \"dev\" so it will just say, \"7.0.0-20af24c\". But that's a very minor point. And they have the full hash in git_revision, so they can identify exactly what it was built from.\r\n\r\nI'm just worried about the issue of support. When we ask \"what version are you using?\" or report a version number for a paper, what do we say? This seems pretty undesirable, especially when it can be fixed by simply reordering your steps so we tag a release, build to that tag, and then distribute that build."}}