{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/bfeldman/fake-site-alert/issues/18","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/bfeldman/fake-site-alert","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/bfeldman/fake-site-alert/issues/18/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/bfeldman/fake-site-alert/issues/18/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/bfeldman/fake-site-alert/issues/18/events","html_url":"https://github.com/bfeldman/fake-site-alert/issues/18","id":190167816,"number":18,"title":"Liberal filter bias","user":{"login":"eyesonlyhack","id":3679372,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/3679372?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/eyesonlyhack","html_url":"https://github.com/eyesonlyhack","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/eyesonlyhack/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/eyesonlyhack/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/eyesonlyhack/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/eyesonlyhack/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/eyesonlyhack/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/eyesonlyhack/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/eyesonlyhack/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/eyesonlyhack/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/eyesonlyhack/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"assignees":[],"milestone":null,"comments":12,"created_at":"2016-11-17T21:22:33Z","updated_at":"2016-11-18T01:31:52Z","closed_at":null,"body":"If you lookup some those websites on Wikipedia, certain sites are clearly not BS. They are either libertarian, conservative, Christian, far-right, anti-establishment or alt-right. For example, Prisonplanet does cover some conspiracy theories but does this make the whole site BS when I found most articles to be perfectly reasonable and newsworthy?\r\n\r\nRT has a Russian Putin bias but most media outlets are very bias towards the Democratic Party or certain candidates in the US, like a bias towards Hillary Clinton, Obama or the Democratic party. So it is a bit of a double standard to include RT.\r\n\r\nI will not go through the whole list but from the top of my head these sites should not be on the list:\r\nbreitbart.com\r\nrt.com\r\nprisonplanet.com\r\nprisonplanet.tv\r\ntwitchy.com\r\nwnd.com\r\nzerohedge.com\r\n\r\nMaybe you should categorise websites as alt-right, christian, Democrat bias, fake, satire, conservative, liberal, etc. and let people decide what to filter? \r\n"},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/bfeldman/fake-site-alert/issues/comments/261423764","html_url":"https://github.com/bfeldman/fake-site-alert/issues/18#issuecomment-261423764","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/bfeldman/fake-site-alert/issues/18","id":261423764,"user":{"login":"thekerp","id":2836619,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/2836619?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/thekerp","html_url":"https://github.com/thekerp","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/thekerp/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/thekerp/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/thekerp/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/thekerp/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/thekerp/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/thekerp/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/thekerp/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/thekerp/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/thekerp/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2016-11-18T01:31:52Z","updated_at":"2016-11-18T01:31:52Z","body":"What I'm looking for is just something that tells me if something like the below is fake. It was recently cited in a Washington Post article about a fake news writer as one of his articles.\r\n\r\n[http://cnn.com.de/news/obama-signs-executive-order-banning-national-anthem/](http://cnn.com.de/news/obama-signs-executive-order-banning-national-anthem/ )\r\n\r\nAssuming everything that got me to the \"fake\" site is possiblly fake or slanted, Google, Washington Post, so on, how could I measure credibility to know that this site is or isn't actually fake (and thus that all the sites that got me there were or weren't suspect in this instance.) It sure seems like CNN if it were to have just showed up in an email/on Facebook. URL could be legit. I'm non technical, but so are most. So I got nothing past 'that's the question we're trying to answer.' Chase the DNS? If you find out a site is hosted somewhere weird then it's probably not actually CNN, as it claims to be, right? Could we use twitter/facebook verified accounts? Probably safe to assume most outlets post everything to socials?"}}
{"actor":{"display_login":"thekerp"}}