{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/pgjdbc/pgjdbc/issues/523","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/pgjdbc/pgjdbc","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/pgjdbc/pgjdbc/issues/523/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/pgjdbc/pgjdbc/issues/523/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/pgjdbc/pgjdbc/issues/523/events","html_url":"https://github.com/pgjdbc/pgjdbc/issues/523","id":135993795,"number":523,"title":"Add support for SLF4J","user":{"login":"niquola","id":32066,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/32066?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/niquola","html_url":"https://github.com/niquola","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/niquola/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/niquola/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/niquola/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/niquola/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/niquola/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/niquola/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/niquola/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/niquola/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/niquola/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":3,"created_at":"2016-02-24T08:39:58Z","updated_at":"2016-02-25T01:22:59Z","closed_at":null,"body":"Please, add native support for popular logging in java.\r\nAs i know, SLF4J is quite mainstream."},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/pgjdbc/pgjdbc/issues/comments/188546454","html_url":"https://github.com/pgjdbc/pgjdbc/issues/523#issuecomment-188546454","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/pgjdbc/pgjdbc/issues/523","id":188546454,"user":{"login":"panchenko","id":440271,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/440271?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/panchenko","html_url":"https://github.com/panchenko","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/panchenko/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/panchenko/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/panchenko/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/panchenko/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/panchenko/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/panchenko/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/panchenko/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/panchenko/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/panchenko/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2016-02-25T01:22:59Z","updated_at":"2016-02-25T01:22:59Z","body":"@niquola Your reply is rather a proposed solution in order to help with some other problem :-)\r\n\r\nLibraries generating queries dynamically usually already support logging (e.g. in the case of ORM libraries that logging could be useful to verify that generated queries are correct).\r\nQuery logging can also be enabled on server (there is also an option to log only the queries taking longer than the specified time).\r\n\r\nHow useful would it be to perform logging also at the driver level? What problems could be solved with that?"}}