{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/shadowsocks/openwrt-shadowsocks/issues/36","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/shadowsocks/openwrt-shadowsocks","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/shadowsocks/openwrt-shadowsocks/issues/36/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/shadowsocks/openwrt-shadowsocks/issues/36/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/shadowsocks/openwrt-shadowsocks/issues/36/events","html_url":"https://github.com/shadowsocks/openwrt-shadowsocks/issues/36","id":53998655,"number":36,"title":"希望实现针对端口的透明代理（如仅对1024一下的保留端口执行透明代理）","user":{"login":"gcell","id":234187,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/234187?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/gcell","html_url":"https://github.com/gcell","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/gcell/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/gcell/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/gcell/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/gcell/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/gcell/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/gcell/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/gcell/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/gcell/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/gcell/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/shadowsocks/openwrt-shadowsocks/labels/question","name":"question","color":"fbca04"}],"state":"closed","locked":false,"assignee":null,"milestone":null,"comments":25,"created_at":"2015-01-11T17:49:07Z","updated_at":"2016-03-21T04:03:43Z","closed_at":"2015-01-12T01:24:32Z","body":"如题，日常应用中80和443端口已经足够，考虑到ssh等应用，系统保留端口也足够，对这些端口执行透明代理，其他端口正常出入，这样的策略更符合使用规律。一般BT都是通过端口映射占用后面的端口，简单区分一下可有效防止家用电脑BT流量占用ss通道，对一些非常规应用的兼容性也将有所提升。\r\n如能实现，感激不尽！\r\n非常感谢开发者带来这么好用的软件！\r\n"},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/shadowsocks/openwrt-shadowsocks/issues/comments/199110279","html_url":"https://github.com/shadowsocks/openwrt-shadowsocks/issues/36#issuecomment-199110279","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/shadowsocks/openwrt-shadowsocks/issues/36","id":199110279,"user":{"login":"cokebar","id":9136591,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/9136591?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/cokebar","html_url":"https://github.com/cokebar","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/cokebar/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/cokebar/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/cokebar/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/cokebar/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/cokebar/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/cokebar/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/cokebar/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/cokebar/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/cokebar/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2016-03-21T04:03:43Z","updated_at":"2016-03-21T04:03:43Z","body":"@aa65535 我觉得完全可以在luci中增加针对端口的ACCESS CONTROL"}}