{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/artemis-nerds/protocol-docs/issues/45","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/artemis-nerds/protocol-docs","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/artemis-nerds/protocol-docs/issues/45/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/artemis-nerds/protocol-docs/issues/45/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/artemis-nerds/protocol-docs/issues/45/events","html_url":"https://github.com/artemis-nerds/protocol-docs/issues/45","id":176177912,"number":45,"title":"Document should include every known packet type, even those without known purpose","user":{"login":"chrivers","id":644439,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/644439?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/chrivers","html_url":"https://github.com/chrivers","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/chrivers/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/chrivers/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/chrivers/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/chrivers/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/chrivers/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/chrivers/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/chrivers/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/chrivers/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/chrivers/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"assignees":[],"milestone":null,"comments":3,"created_at":"2016-09-10T12:46:14Z","updated_at":"2016-09-11T02:38:02Z","closed_at":null,"body":"I propose that we list every observed packet type in the protocol docs, with as much information as we have.\r\n\r\nAt the same time, these subtypes should be clearly labeled as being wholly or partially unknown.\r\n\r\nPackets with completely unknown function, will be prefixed with \"_UNKNOWN\" or similar prefix, to clearly distinguish them from the known packets.\r\n\r\nWill you accept a PR for this?"},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/artemis-nerds/protocol-docs/issues/comments/246158063","html_url":"https://github.com/artemis-nerds/protocol-docs/issues/45#issuecomment-246158063","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/artemis-nerds/protocol-docs/issues/45","id":246158063,"user":{"login":"rjwut","id":5790951,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/5790951?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/rjwut","html_url":"https://github.com/rjwut","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/rjwut/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/rjwut/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/rjwut/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/rjwut/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/rjwut/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/rjwut/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/rjwut/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/rjwut/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/rjwut/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2016-09-11T02:38:02Z","updated_at":"2016-09-11T02:38:02Z","body":"I agree that it would be good for the [table of packet types](https://artemis-nerds.github.io/protocol-docs/#packet-types) to be in numerical order by packet type then subtype, while the document itself (and the corresponding floating table of contents at the left) remains in alphabetical order. That would make it easy to locate any one packet by name, but would still provide the advantages previously mentioned for listing them in numerical order.\r\n\r\nThe table is built dynamically on page load. It is currently done in a single pass; the table is written as the packet `<section>`s are iterated. This would have to change to a two-pass mechanism: one pass to collect them into an array, which is then sorted, then a second pass to write the table."}}
{"actor":{"display_login":"rjwut"}}