{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/opencontrol/schemas/issues/25","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/opencontrol/schemas","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/opencontrol/schemas/issues/25/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/opencontrol/schemas/issues/25/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/opencontrol/schemas/issues/25/events","html_url":"https://github.com/opencontrol/schemas/issues/25","id":163270195,"number":25,"title":"implementation_status needs to allow for multiple values","user":{"login":"jbarnicle","id":737400,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/737400?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/jbarnicle","html_url":"https://github.com/jbarnicle","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jbarnicle/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jbarnicle/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jbarnicle/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jbarnicle/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jbarnicle/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jbarnicle/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jbarnicle/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jbarnicle/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jbarnicle/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"assignees":[],"milestone":null,"comments":3,"created_at":"2016-06-30T21:23:04Z","updated_at":"2016-07-06T19:49:32Z","closed_at":null,"body":"For some implementations, implementation_status can contain multiple values.  Example: FedRamp controls could be both partially implemented and planned.  "},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/opencontrol/schemas/issues/comments/230886009","html_url":"https://github.com/opencontrol/schemas/issues/25#issuecomment-230886009","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/opencontrol/schemas/issues/25","id":230886009,"user":{"login":"pburkholder","id":1211146,"avatar_url":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/1211146?v=3","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/pburkholder","html_url":"https://github.com/pburkholder","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/pburkholder/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/pburkholder/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/pburkholder/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/pburkholder/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/pburkholder/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/pburkholder/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/pburkholder/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/pburkholder/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/pburkholder/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2016-07-06T19:49:32Z","updated_at":"2016-07-06T19:49:32Z","body":"This is a hard one. I'd prefer not to see schema sprawl, having to support `implementation_status` and `implementation_statuses`, but I don't think it makes sense either to say that `implementation_status` can be of `type: any` and let people use either `string` or `seq` as they need to.\r\n\r\nNow that I'm done with dithering, I'd be okay with adding `implementation_statuses` and supporting both the list and scalar through version 4, and dropping support for `implementation_status` in version 5."}}
{"actor":{"display_login":"pburkholder"}}