construction waste construction waste construction waste or debris is any kind of debris from the construction process. different government agencies have clear definitions. for example, the united states environmental protection agency epa defines construction and demolition materials as “debris generated during the construction, renovation and demolition of buildings, roads, and bridges.” additionally, the epa has categorized construction and demolition (c&d) waste into three categories: non-dangerous, hazardous, and semi-hazardous. part of a series onpollutionpolyurethane insulator material marked for removal of the construction site (of a residential building) air acid rain air quality index atmospheric dispersion modeling chlorofluorocarbon exhaust gas haze indoor air internal combustion engine global dimming global distillation ozone depletion particulates persistent organic pollutant smog aerosol soot volatile organic compound biological biological hazard genetic introduced species (invasive species) digital information electromagnetic light ecological overillumination radio spectrum natural ozone radium and radon in the environment volcanic ash wildfire noise transportation land water air rail sustainable transport urban sonar marine mammals and sonar industrial military abstract noise control radiation actinides bioremediation depleted uranium nuclear fission nuclear fallout plutonium poisoning radioactivity uranium electromagnetic radiation and health radioactive waste soil agricultural herbicides manure waste pesticides land degradation bioremediation defecation electrical resistance heating soil guideline values phytoremediation solid waste biodegradable waste brown waste electronic waste battery recycling food waste green waste hazardous waste biomedical waste chemical waste construction waste lead poisoning mercury poisoning toxic waste international waste industrial waste lead smelting litter mining coal mining gold mining surface mining deep sea mining mining waste uranium mining municipal solid waste garbage nanomaterials plastic microplastics packaging waste post-consumer waste waste management landfill thermal treatment space satellite thermal urban heat island visual air travel advertising clutter overhead power lines traffic signs vandalism war chemical warfare herbicidal warfare (agent orange) nuclear holocaust (nuclear fallout - nuclear famine - nuclear winter) scorched earth unexploded ordnance war and environmental law water agricultural wastewater diseases eutrophication firewater freshwater groundwater hypoxia industrial wastewater marine debris monitoring nonpoint source see misc section nutrient ocean acidification oil spill pharmaceuticals freshwater salinization septic tanks sewage septic tanks pit latrine shipping stagnation sulfur water surface runoff turbidity urban runoff water quality misc point source area source legacy pollution lists diseases law by country most polluted cities least polluted cities by pm2.5 treaties categories by country environment portal ecology portal of total waste in the united states, 90% comes from the demolition of structures, while waste generated during construction accounts for less than 10%. construction waste frequently includes materials that are hazardous if disposed of in landfills. such items include fluorescent lights, batteries, and other electrical equipment. when waste is created, options of disposal include exportation to a landfill, incineration, direct site reuse through integration into construction or as fill dirt, and recycling for a new use if applicable. in dealing with construction and demolition waste products, it is often hard to recycle and repurpose because of the cost of processing. businesses recycling materials must compete with often the low cost of landfills and new construction commodities. data provided by 24 states reported that solid waste from construction and demolition (c&d) accounts for 23% of total waste in the u.s. this is almost a quarter of the total solid waste produced by the united states. during construction a lot of this waste spends in a landfill leaching toxic chemicals into the surrounding environment. results of a recent questionnaire demonstrate that although 95.71% of construction projects indicate that construction waste is problematic, only 57.14% of those companies collect any relevant data. types of waste c&d materials, construction and demolition materials, are materials used in and harvested from new building and civilengineer structures. much building waste is made up of materials such as bricks, concrete and wood damaged or unused during construction. observational research has shown that this can be as high as 10 to 15% of the materials that go into a building, a much higher percentage than the 2.5-5% usually assumed by quantity surveyors and the construction industry. since considerable variability exists between construction sites, there is much opportunity for reducing this waste. there has been a massive increase in construction and demolition waste created over the last 30 years in the united states. in 1990, 135 million tons of construction and demolition debris by weight were created and had risen to 600 million tons by the year 2018. this is a 300% increase, but it is important to note that since 2015 the epa has kept records of how the waste is disposed of. in 2018, 600 million tons of waste was created due to construction and demolition, and 143 million tons of it resides in landfills. this means that about 76% of waste is now retained and repurposed in the industry, but there is still more waste being exported to landfills than the entire amount of waste created in 1990. this unsustainable consumption of raw materials creates increasing business risks. this includes higher material costs or disruptions in the supply chains. in 2010, the epa created the sustainable materials management (smm) program strategic plan which marked a strategic shift by the epa to move emphasis from broad resource recovery initiative to sustainable materials management. since material management regulations largely exist at a state and local level, this is no real standard practice across the nation for responsible waste mitigation strategies for construction materials. the epa aims to increase access to collection, processing, and recycling infrastructure in order to meet this issue head on. main causes of waste construction waste can be categorized as follows: design, handling, worker, management, site condition, procurement and external. these categories were derived from data collected from past research concerning the frequency of different types of waste noted during each type of these activities. examples of this type of waste are as follows: steel reinforcement construction site in amsterdam steel is used as reinforcement and structural integrity in the vast majority of construction projects. the main reasons steel is wasted on a site is due to irresponsible beam cutting and fabrication issues. the worst sites usually end up being the ones that do not have adequate design details and standards, which can result in waste due to short ends of bars being discarded due to improper planning of cuts. many companies now choose to purchase preassembled steel reinforcement pieces. this reduces waste by outsourcing the bar cutting to companies that prioritize responsible material use. concrete mixer premixed concrete premixed concrete has one of the lowest waste indices when compared to other building materials. many site managers site the difficulties controlling concrete delivery amounts as a major issue in accurately quantifying concrete needed for a site. the deviations from actually constructed concrete slabs and beams and the design amounts necessary were found to be 5.4% and 2.7% larger than expected, respectively, when comparing the data from 30 brazilian sites. many of these issues were attributed to inadequate form layout or lack of precision in excavation for foundation piles. additionally, site managers know that additional concrete may be needed, and they will often order excess material to not interrupt the concrete pouring. pipes and wires it is often difficult to plan and keep track of all the pipes and wires on a site as they are used in so many different areas of a project, especially when electrical and plumbing services are routinely subcontracted. many issues of waste arise in this area of the construction process because of poorly designed details and irresponsible cutting of pipes and wires leaving short, wasted pipes and wires. improper material storage the second leading cause of construction waste production is inproper material storage. exposure to the elements and miss handling by persons are due to human error. part of this human error can lead to illegal dumping and illegal transportation volume of waste from a jobsite. recycling, disposal and environmental impact recycling and reuse of material recycling trucks most guidelines on c&d waste management follows the waste managing hierarchy framework. this framework involves a set of alternatives for dealing with waste arranged in descending order of preference. the waste hierarchy is a nationally and internationally accepted concept used to priorities and guide efforts to manage waste. under the idea of waste hierarchy, there is the concept of the "3r's," often known as "reduce, reuse, recycle." certain countries adopt different numbers of "r's." the european union, for example, puts principal to the "4r" system which includes "recovery" in order to reduce waste of materials. alternatives include prevention, energy recovery, (treatment) and disposal. it is possible to recycle many elements of construction waste. often roll-off containers are used to transport the waste. rubble can be crushed and reused in construction projects. waste wood can also be recovered and recycled. landfilling some certain components of construction waste such as plasterboard are hazardous once landfilled. plasterboard is broken down in landfill conditions releasing hydrogen sulfide, a toxic gas. once broken down, plasterboard poses a threat for increases arsenic concentration levels in its toxic inorganic form. the traditional disposal way for construction waste is to send it to landfill sites. in the u.s., federal regulations now require groundwater monitoring, waste screening, and operator training, due to the environmental impact of waste in c&d landfills (cfr 1996). sending the waste directly to a landfill causes many problems: landfill waste of natural resources increases construction cost, especially the transportation process occupies a large area of land reduces soil quality causes water pollution (leachate) causes air pollution produces security risks etc. incineration and health risks where recycling is not an option, the disposal of construction waste and hazardous materials must be carried out according to legislation of relevant councils and regulatory bodies. the penalties for improper disposal of construction waste and hazardous waste, including asbestos, can reach into the tens of thousands of dollars for businesses and individuals. waste incinerator waste-to-energy facilities burn more than 13% of solid municipal waste. the toxic fumes emitted by wte plants can contain harmful chemicals such as mercury and other heavy metals, carbon monoxide, sulfur dioxide, and dioxins. dioxin was used as a waste oil in times beach, missouri. days after the chemicals were introduced to the community animals began dying. by the time the epa deemed dioxins to be highly toxic in the 1980s, the cdc recommended the town be abandoned entirely due to contaminated waste products in the area. by 1985, the entire population of times beach had been relocated, prompting missouri to build a new incinerator on the contaminated land. they continued to burn 265,000 tons of dioxin-contaminated waste until 1997. dioxins are a family of chemicals produced as a byproduct during the manufacturing of many pesticides and construction materials like carpeting and pvc. these chemicals exist in the environment attached to soil or dust particles that are invisible to the naked eye. dioxins break down slowly. it still threatens public health at low levels. since industry has mostly stopped producing dioxins, one of the largest contributors releasing harmful dioxins left in the united states is waste incineration. dioxins have been proven to cause cancer, reproductive and developmental issues, and immune system damage. rates of cancer such as non-hodgkin's lymphoma and soft tissue sarcoma rise significantly the closer one lives to the pollutants' source. management strategies waste management fees waste management fees, under the 'polluter pays principle', can help mitigate levels of construction waste. there is very little information on determining a waste management fee for construction waste created. many models for this have been created in the past, but they are subjective and flawed. in 2019, a study method was proposed to optimize the construction waste management fee. the new model expands on previous ones by considering life-cycle costs of construction waste and weighs it against the willingness to improve construction waste management. the study was based out of china. china has a large waste management issue, and their landfills are mostly filled in urban areas. the results of the study indicated different waste management fees for metal, wood, and masonry waste as $9.30, $5.92, and $4.25, respectively. the cost of waste management per square meter, or just under 11 square feet, on average was found to be $0.12. this type of waste management system requires top-down legislative action. it is not a choice the contractor has the luxury of making on his/her own.