posthypnotic amnesia posthypnotic amnesia post-hypnotic amnesia is the inability in hypnotic subjects to recall events that took place while under hypnosis. this can be achieved by giving individuals a suggestion during hypnosis to forget certain material that they have learned either before or during hypnosis. individuals who are experiencing post-hypnotic amnesia cannot have their memories recovered once put back under hypnosis and is therefore not state dependent. nevertheless, memories may return when presented with a pre-arranged cue. this makes post-hypnotic amnesia similar to psychogenic amnesia as it disrupts the retrieval process of memory. it has been suggested that inconsistencies in methodologies used to study post-hypnotic amnesia cause varying results. history post-hypnotic amnesia was first discovered by marquis de puységur in 1784. when working with his subject victor, puységur noticed that when victor would come out of hypnosis he would have amnesia for everything that had happened during the session. recognizing the importance of this power, puységur soon began treating those who were ill with induced amnesia. when french physician ambroise-auguste liébeault published a book on hypnotism in 1866 he proposed that post-hypnotic amnesia was a "symptom" and a varying degree of hypnotism. similarly, 19th century french neurologist jean martin charcot focused solely on post-hypnotic amnesia. charcot introduced three states of hypnosis: fatigue, catalepsy, and somnambulism, or sleepwalking; it was within this last state that charcot believed individuals could be communicated to and could respond to suggestions. charcot showed that if an individual (through post-hypnotic suggestion) self-suggested that they had a psychological trauma, those who were neurologically susceptible would display symptoms of psychological trauma. it was hypothesized that this was due to the dissociation of the ideas from the rest of the individual's consciousness. however, dissociation theory was put aside for freud's psychoanalytic theory and the rise of behaviourism until ernest hilgard renewed its study in the 1970s. some of the earliest experimental studies on post-hypnotic amnesia were done by clark hull (1933). hull's work showed that there was dissociation between explicit memory and implicit memory through studies on proactive interference and retroactive interference, pair associations and complex mental addition. in the mid-1960s, evan and thorn produced studies on source amnesia. in one study hypnotized individuals were taught answers to obscure facts and when brought out of their hypnotized states, one third of the individuals were able to produce the correct answers. nevertheless, these same individuals had no conscious memory of where they learned this material. categories spontaneous and suggested post-hypnotic amnesia can occur or be induced in an individual. spontaneous for most of the 19th century, investigators reported that post-hypnotic amnesia only occurred spontaneously as scientific knowledge regarding this form of amnesia was minimal. spontaneous post-hypnotic amnesia represents a slight memory impairment that results as a consequence of being put under hypnosis or being tested. this form of amnesia can also be experienced across susceptibility groups, but to a much lesser extent and magnitude to suggested post-hypnotic amnesia. spontaneous amnesia has also been difficult to determine as research bias has been found to influence in many cases. in one study participants were put into two groups; one was to receive amnesic instructions and half were not given the instructions. the next day the groups were reversed. results showed that there was little spontaneous amnesia across all participants, leading to doubts towards the actual occurrence of amnesia. it was later found that those more susceptible to hypnosis were more susceptible to suggested post-hypnotic amnesia and not spontaneous amnesia. these results suggest that spontaneous amnesia is less common than suggested amnesia and that when high results of spontaneous amnesia are recorded, some incidences may be false. suggested suggested post-hypnotic amnesia involves the suggestion to hypnotized persons that following hypnosis they will be unable to accurately recall specific material (e.g. stimuli or events learned while under hypnosis) until they receive a reversibility cue. this type of post-hypnotic amnesia is the most commonly used within research surrounding post-hypnotic amnesia due to its controlled nature. suggested amnesia has been found to result in a more significant memory loss than spontaneous amnesia, regardless of the order of induction. on average, more individuals experience suggested amnesia and there appears to be a moderate effect across individuals of all levels of hypnotic susceptibility. suggested post-hypnotic amnesia also involves a "temporary, retrieval-based dissociation between episodic and semantic memory". however, it is more common for highly hypnotizable individuals to remember less information than low hypnotizable individuals or controls while under suggested post-hypnotic amnesia. post-hypnotic amnesia is reversible, a characteristic that distinguishes it from other forms of amnesia that arise primarily from traumatic brain injury. whereas the retrieval of memories under retrograde amnesia is a slow and labour-intensive process, the reversal of hypnotically-induced amnesia can occur with a simple suggestion or reversal cue (e.g., "when i clap my hands, you will remember everything"). types recall amnesia post-hypnotic recall amnesia refers to an individual's inability to recall, when in a normal conscious state, the events that occurred during hypnosis. evidence for this type of post-hypnotic amnesia is seen in a typical research model testing where nonsense syllables, that were paired during hypnosis, are unable to be recalled post hypnotically when a suggestion for amnesia was given during hypnosis. recall amnesia for word associations tend to be very high when done by post-hypnotic individuals, with some studies showing one hundred percent total recall amnesia. this amnesia can also be measured by asking individuals, after their hypnosis has been terminated, to describe what they have been doing since they first laid down on the couch for their hypnosis session. when using this method for experimental testing, the hypnosis session will typically involve several tests or activities that the subject will engage in. recall amnesia can then be measured by the amount of accurate tasks and activities the subject is able to remember. recognition amnesia recognition amnesia equates to an impairment of an individual's recognition memory brought on by amnesia. as event-related potentials have been found to be sensitive to familiar stimuli in the absence of recognition impairments it has been suggested that individuals who report amnesia after hypnosis might not be experiencing post-amnesia recognition impairments. instead, they may not be accurately describing their experience and confuse having amnesia for a lack of attention during encoding of tested stimuli. source amnesia post-hypnotic source amnesia refers to the ability of individuals to correctly recall information learned during hypnosis without the recollection of where the information was acquired. in a typical study examining this type of amnesia, individuals are administered a hypnotic induction procedure which is immediately followed by a series of questions concerning unfamiliar facts, for example "what year was freud born in?". subjects who are unable to correctly answer these questions are informed of the correct answers. these individuals are then administered a suggestion to be amnesic for everything that occurred during the period of which they are hypnotized. after the hypnotic session, those who exhibit post-hypnotic source amnesia, when asked the same unfamiliar questions again, will respond with the correct answers but will not be able to state where they learned the answer, or, more commonly, rationalize an incorrect source of their answer. models and theoretical explanations dissociation dissociation, a theory originally applied by pierre janet, implies the view of the conscious self as being totally suspended. dissociation, when referring to post-hypnotic amnesia, can be applied when the whole period in which an individual is hypnotized is looked at as an episode that is separated from the rest of that individual's experiences by boundaries of amnesia and suggestion. the failure to recall memory when in a normal, conscious state provides evidence to suggest that some kind of functional barrier is holding the information retained during hypnosis back from conscious recall. however, how sufficient the dissociative barrier in a hypnotic patient's mind is seems to be not all that effective, thus diminishing the credibility of the dissociation theory. this is easily seen in several studies where engaging in a secondary hypnotic session or the suggestion of the hypnotist or therapist to retrieve and recall information and events from the hypnotic session, readily and accurately initiate the retrieval that, according to dissociation, should be blocked from retrieval. disrupted retrieval this theory proposes that when it comes to post-hypnotic amnesia, individuals are unable to recall efficiently and accurately the events that took place while they were hypnotized because there is a greater degree of overall disruption in the retrieval of their hypnosis events. this temporary disruption in retrieval is typically due to the induced amnesic suggestion that a hypnotists or therapist will usually give during the session. studies have been able to demonstrate this theory showing that hypnotizable subjects tend to recall events, if they even can, in a random, unassociated fashion, whereas subjects who did not receive a hypnotic suggestion for amnesia are able to recall in an orderly sequenced manner, starting with the original event of hypnosis and then recalling succeeding events in the correct order as they occurred. results support this theory by indicating that effective retrieval cues, such as the temporal sequence of events, may not be being used successfully while under hypnosis compared to when they are used by individuals in a normal, waking state. as a result, a disruption in memory recollection which is characteristic of post-hypnotic amnesia appears. verbal inhibition model this theory on post-hypnotic amnesia argues that individuals who have been hypnotized actually do have the ability to remember material from their hypnosis sessions. however, these individuals simply inhibit their verbal report of that information. it is believed that the material learned while under hypnosis is activated and retrieved into working memory where it is then processed and checked to see if it is material that can or should be remembered or if it is material that is forbidden and should therefore be forgotten. if the material is deemed forbidden, this theory suggests that the material is denied verbal output and sometimes even admission into an individual's conscious awareness. effects and impact cognitive many theorists believe that explicit and implicit memory are separate memory systems in the brain. however, much research on explicit and implicit memory in post-hypnotic amnesia has shown that if they are separate areas, they interact often and in a variety of ways. attention, selection, and accessibility of information are processes thought to be involved in the phenomenon of posthypnotic amnesia, and when tested, post-hypnotic amnesia has shown to cause dissociation between both implicit and explicit expressions of memory. in observing dissociation in post-hypnotic amnesia there are three aspects that differentiate it from other forms of amnesia. firstly, items are deeply processed during encoding. secondly, individuals are semantically primed – this relies on deep encoding and preserved cue retrieval. thirdly, the impairment of the explicit memory is only temporary; implicit memories can be restored to explicit when given the reversible prearranged cue. research has found that the memory of individuals who are very highly susceptible to hypnotism is more influenced by implicit effects (word-stem completions, word associations and lexical decision tasks) than explicit effects (recognition tasks) those posthypnotic subjects who have no explicit memory of cues learned under hypnosis have been found to generate many of these explicit cues in free association tests. a post-hypnotic suggestion to forget can also successfully cause a deficit in autobiographical memory. results from barnier's study associating post-hypnotic amnesia and autobiographical supported previous findings regarding a dissociation between explicit and implicit memory, as well as impaired explicit recall – traits common to psychogenic amnesia. after the suggested instructions to elicit post-hypnotic amnesia were administered, those participants that were highly susceptible to hypnosis showed more impaired recall of the autobiographical episode targeted by the suggestion, with both groups providing substantial information for the more recent autobiographical episode. additionally, information from the "forgotten" episode (demonstrating implicit memory) influenced overall performance on the category-generation and social judgement tasks aimed at testing each participant's explicit memory. biological an increase in activation in the prefrontal cortex has been associated with post-hypnotic amnesiapost-hypnotic amnesia is characterized as a "retrieval deficit", whereas other types of amnesia suffer from a "storage" deficit (e.g. anterograde amnesia). post-hypnotic amnesia has been correlated with reduced cortical activity in the occipital and temporal cortex, while showing an increase in activation in the prefrontal cortex. it has been suggested that some of