black death migration black death migration the black death was one of the most devastating pandemics in human history, resulting in the deaths of an estimated 75 to 200 million people in eurasia, and peaking in eurasia from 1321 to 1353. its migration followed the sea and land trading routes of the medieval world. this migration has been studied for centuries as an example of how the spread of contagious diseases is impacted by human society and economics. plaque in weymouth, england plague is caused by yersinia pestis, and is enzootic (commonly present) in populations of ground rodents in central asia. while initial phylogenetic studies suggested that the plague bacillus evolved 2,000 years ago near china, specifically in the tian shan mountains on the border between modern-day china and kyrgyzstan, this view has been contested by recent molecular studies which have indicated that the plague was present in scandinavia 3,000 years earlier. likewise, the immediate origins of the black death are also uncertain. the pandemic has often been assumed to have started in china, but lack of physical and specific textual evidence for it in 14th century china has resulted in continued disputes on the origin to this day. other theories of origin place the first cases in the steppes of central asia or the near east. historians michael w. dols and ole benedictow argue that the historical evidence concerning epidemics in the mediterranean and specifically the plague of justinian point to a probability that the black death originated in central asia, where it then became entrenched among the rodent population. according to eastern origin theories, it has been assumed that the plague transferred from central asia east and west along the silk road, by mongol armies and traders making use of the opportunities of free passage within the mongol empire offered by the pax mongolica. it was reportedly first introduced to europe when mongols lobbed plague-infected corpses during the siege of caffa in the crimea in 1347. the genoese traders fled, bringing the plague by ship into sicily and southern europe, whence it spread. however even the silk road spread theory is disputed, as others point out that the pax mongolica had already broken down by 1325, when western and persian traders found it difficult to conduct trade in the region, and impossible by 1340. preexisting conditions regardless of its origin, it is clear that several preexisting conditions such as war, famine, and weather contributed to the severity of the black death. in china, the 13th-century mongol conquest disrupted farming and trading, and led to widespread famine. the population dropped from approximately 120 to 60 million. in northern europe, new technological innovations such as the heavy plough and the three-field system were not as effective in clearing new fields for harvest as they were in the mediterranean because the north had poor, clay-like soil. food shortages and skyrocketing prices were a fact of life for as much as a century before the plague. wheat, oats, hay, and consequently livestock, were all in short supply, and their scarcity resulted in hunger and malnutrition. the result was a mounting human vulnerability to disease due to weakened immune systems. the medieval warm period ended in europe sometime in the 13th century, bringing harsher winters and reduced harvests. heavy rains in late 1314 began several years of cold and wet winters. the already weak harvests of the north suffered. in the years 1315 to 1317, a catastrophic famine, known as the great famine, struck much of northwest europe. the famine came about as the result of a large population growth in the previous centuries, with the result that, in the early 14th century the population exceeded the number that could be sustained by farming. the great famine was the worst in european history, reducing the population by at least ten percent. records recreated from dendrochronological studies show a hiatus in building construction during the period, as well as a deterioration in climate. this was the economic and social situation in which the predictor of the coming disaster, a typhoid epidemic, emerged. many thousands died in populated urban centres, most significantly ypres. in 1318 a pestilence of unknown origin, sometimes identified as anthrax, affected the animals of europe, notably sheep and cattle, further reducing the food supply and income of the peasantry. the european economy entered a vicious circle in which hunger and chronic, low-level debilitating disease reduced the productivity of labourers, and so the grain output was reduced, causing grain prices to increase. this situation was worsened when landowners and monarchs like edward iii of england (r. 1327–1377) and philip vi of france (r. 1328–1350), out of a fear that their comparatively high standard of living would decline, raised the fines and rents of their tenants. standards of living then fell drastically, diets grew more limited, and europeans as a whole experienced more health problems. possible asian outbreak china for years it was common for europeans to assume that the black death originated in china. charles creighton, in his history of epidemics in britain (1891), summarizes the tendency to retrospectively describe the origins of the black death in china despite lack of evidence for it: "in that nebulous and unsatisfactory state the old tradition of the black death originating in china has remained to the present hour". there were records of epidemics from 1308 to 1347 but the loss of life is "clearly assigned to floods and famines, with their attendant sickness." in 1308, there was a plague or malignant fever in jiangxi and zhejiang following floods, locusts, and failure of crops. in 1313 there was an epidemic in the capital. according to creighton, chinese records of pestilence and epidemics in the 14th century suggest nothing more than typhus, and the dates of major chinese outbreaks of epidemic disease, marked as "great pestilence" or "great plague" from 1352 to 1363, post-date the european epidemic by several years. the suggestion is that the soil of china may not have felt the full effects of the plague virus, originally engendered thereon, until some few years after the same had been carried to europe, having produced there within a short space of time the stupendous phenomenon of the black death. if there be something of a paradox in that view, it is the facts themselves that refuse to fall into what might be thought the natural sequence.— charles creighton three waves of epidemics occurred in the last years of the yuan dynasty: 1331-34 spreading from hebei to hunan, in 1344–46 in coastal fujian and shandong, and in the 1350s throughout northern and central china. the epidemic of 1331-34 recorded a death toll of 13 million people by 1333. the epidemic of 1344-46 was called a "great pestilence." on the heels of the european epidemic, a widespread disaster occurred in china during 1353–1354. chinese accounts of this wave of the disease record a spread to eight distinct areas: hubei, jiangxi, shanxi, hunan, guangdong, guangxi, henan, and suiyuan. more than two thirds of the population in part of shanxi died and six or seven out of ten in hubei died. epidemics afflicted various provinces from 1356 to 1360. in 1358, over 200,000 in shanxi and hubei died. in hebei and shandong, the population fell from 3.3 million in 1207 to 1.1 million in 1393, however the population in the southern yangzi region continued to grow from 1210 to the mid-1350s and only fell by less than 10 percent by 1381. research on the delhi sultanate and the yuan dynasty shows no evidence of any serious epidemic in fourteenth-century india and no specific evidence of plague in fourteenth-century china, suggesting that the black death may not have reached these regions. according to dr mark achtman, the black death evolved in china over 2,600 years but the dating of the plague suggests that it was not carried along the silk road and its appearance there probably postdates the european outbreak. there is also no physical or specific textual evidence for the black death in 14th century china. it's speculated that rats aboard zheng he's ships in the 15th century may have carried the plague to southeast asia, india, and africa. in the present state of research, it is unclear whether 13th-century epidemics in china were in fact outbreaks of the black death. according to george d. sussman, although a case for the black death in china is stronger than india, there are several reasons to question it. one, it did not seem to spread throughout all of china but only in certain provinces and regions, unlike in europe, despite its relatively dense population and integrated economy. two, there are no descriptions of the symptoms of the black death. three, the timing does not seem to coincide with the spread of the black death elsewhere. what we know, then, is that major, highly lethal epidemics afflicted china in the 1330s–50s and undoubtedly contributed to a catastrophic population collapse that began in the thirteenth century and continued, or perhaps rebounded, in the mid-fourteenth century. although we know nothing of the clinical details of the disease or diseases behind the epidemics, we do know that they began in the northeast (hebei and shandong) and spread down the coast and inland to the central provinces. we hear only scant references to these epidemics in the south and none in the southwest or west. of course, that may be because those area were remote from the capital and sparsely populated compared to the northeastern and central provinces. if the disease afflicting china in the mid-fourteenth century was the plague, which was ravaging the middle east and europe from 1347 onward, it probably entered china from the mongolian steppes north of hebei and not from the yunnan focus in the far southwest.— george d. sussman bubonic plague in its endemic form was mentioned for the first time in chinese sources in 610 and 652, which if presumed to be in connection to the first plague pandemic, would have required human spread for a realistic spread rate from west to east over 5,500 km. in 610, chao yuanfang mentioned a "malignant bubo" "coming on abruptly with high fever together with the appearance of a bundle of nodes beneath the tissues." sun simo, who died in 652, also mentioned a "malignant bubo" and plague that was common in guangdong but was rare in interior provinces. benedictow believes this indicates the spread of an offshoot of the first plague pandemic which reached chinese territory by 600. the earliest chinese description of the black death comes from a local gazetteer from shanxi in 1644: "in the autumn there was a great epidemic. the victim first developed a hard lump below the armpits or between the thighs or else coughed thin blood and died before they had time to take medicine. even friends and relations did not dare to ask after the sick or come with their condolences. there were whole families wiped out with none to bury them." the customs service list described it as a "great pestilence in lu-an" where "those attacked had hard lumps grow on the neck or arm, like clotted blood. whole families perished. in some cases the victims spat blood suddenly, and expired." this coincided with two epidemics from 1586 to 1589 and 1639–44 that have been characterized as the most deadly in chinese history. even then the epidemics do not seem to have behaved the same as in europe. the epidemics in 17th century china were preceded by huge die offs in the rodent population and took decades to spread from province to province and never spread throughout the whole country, ultimately killing less than 5% of the population. india it has been debated whether or not the black death occurred in india. the sultan of the delhi sultanate, muhammad bin tughluq, made a military campaign toward the south of india in 1334–1335. the military expedition was suddenly interrupted when an epidemic started to spread within his army to such an extent that the whole expedition had to be stopped, and the army returned to delhi. when the army returned to delhi, only a third of the soldiers were reportedly left. due to the fragmentary sources available, it is not known what illness this was and if it was the same as