a simple, safer and cheaper posterolateral fusion without instrumentation. recently, the literature published in this field is sending a message to use "minimally invasive techniques"; – the abandonment of transpedicular fusions. surgery in general, and usage of metal fixation should be discarded in most cases. in sweden, the national registry of lumbar spine surgery reported in the year 2000 that 15% of patients with spinal stenosis surgery underwent a concomitant fusion. despite the traditionally conservative approach to spinal surgery in sweden, there have been calls from that country for a more aggressive approach to lumbar procedures in recent years. cherkin et al., evaluated worldwide surgical attitudes. there were twice the number of surgeons per capita in the united states compared to the united kingdom. numbers were similar to sweden. despite having very few spinal surgeons, the netherlands proved to be quite aggressive in surgery. sweden, despite having a large number of surgeons was conservative and produced relatively few surgeries. the most surgeries were done in the united states. in the uk, more than a third of non-urgent patients waited over a year to see a spinal surgeon. in wales, more than half waited over three months for consult. lower rates of referrals in the united kingdom was found to discourage surgery in general. fee for service and easy access to care was thought to encourage spinal surgery in the united states, whereas salaried position and a conservative philosophy led to less surgery in the united kingdom. there were more spinal surgeons in sweden than in the united states. however, it was speculated that the swedish surgeons being limited to compensation of 40–48 hours a week might lead to a conservative philosophy. there have been calls for a more aggressive approach to lumbar surgery in both the united kingdom and sweden in recent years.