You will be given a definition of a task first, then some input of the task.
In this task, you are given a text of many news articles seperated by special token "|||||". Your task is to summarize them.

Since good-looking politicians win more votes, a beauty advantage for politicians on the left or on the right is bound to have political consequences. We show that politicians on the right look more beautiful in Europe, the United States and Australia. Our explanation is that beautiful people earn more, which makes them less inclined to support redistribution. Our model of within-party competition predicts that voters use beauty as a cue for conservatism when they do not know much about candidates and that politicians on the right benefit more from beauty in low-information elections. Evidence from real and experimental elections confirms both predictions. ||||| In a study published in the Journal of Public Economics, it was found that the general attractiveness of a political candidate correlates to their ideology, and that those on the right in Europe, Australia and the US were overall seen as better looking than their counterparts on the left. 
  
 The research also noted that this was a correlation and not causation. Essentially, attractive people tend to drift towards more conservative political positions because life tends to be easier for them, considering they tend to make more money, and are thus going to be generally more resistant to the type of social welfare and redistribution programs championed by liberals. 
  
 Another explanation the study proposed for attractive people leaning right is that they are usually treated better than everyone else and therefore don’t see the need to make the world more equal for others, finding things to largely be fair. 
  
 The study was conducted by researchers showing those surveyed to respond to photos of candidates and lawmakers in Europe, America and Australia and to rate them on a five-point scale on attractiveness. The results showed that those on the right fared better on the beauty scale than liberals. It was also shown that in the United States, Republican voters care more about appearance than Democrats, specifically when it comes to candidates they no little about ideologically. 
  
 It was also found that when asked if a candidate was conservative or liberal, respondents used their attractiveness to figure it out, tending to answer conservative the more attractive the candidate. 
  
 [image via Shutterstock] 
  
 – 
  
 Follow Justin Baragona on Twitter: @justinbaragona 
  
 Have a tip we should know? tips@mediaite.com |||||  
  
 iStock illustration 
  
 Research has found that being attractive influences many things in a person’s life — their salary, their popularity and grades in school, even the prison sentences they receive. So why not their politics? 
  
 A recently published study in the Journal of Public Economics concludes that the attractiveness of a candidate does correlate with their politics. They find that politicians on the right are more good looking in Europe, the United States and Australia. 
  
 The study shows correlation, not causation, but the researchers float a simple economic explanation for why this might happen. Numerous studies have shown that good-looking people are likely to earn more, and that people who earn more are typically more opposed to redistributive policies, like the progressive taxes and welfare programs favored by the left. 
  
 The researchers also offer a more general psychological explanation for the trend: That good-looking people are often treated better than others, and thus see the world as a more just place. Past studies have found that the more attractive people believe themselves to be, the lower their preference for egalitarianism, a value typically associated with the political left. 
  
 In their first experiment, the researchers showed respondents photographs of political candidates in Finnish municipal and parliamentary elections, members of the European Parliament, U.S. candidates for Senate and governor, and candidates for Australia’s House of Representatives. They asked participants to rate the photographs on a five-point scale. The results suggested that politicians on the right are more beautiful on all three continents. 
  
 In a separate experiment, the researchers analyzed elections in Finland. They say these elections are easier to study because most races feature multiple candidates competing for office — in contrast to races in the United States, which typically have just two major candidates. 
  
 The researchers found that Republican voters care more about appearance than Democratic voters do, but only if the voters don't have much information about the candidates and have to rely largely on appearance — in city-level elections, for example. 
  
 But in elections that give voters a lot of information – like parliamentary elections when candidates are well covered by TV news and in the newspaper – politicians' appearance matters equally to voters regardless of party or ideology. 
  
 In low-information city elections, a beauty increase of one standard deviation attracts about 20 percent more votes for the average candidate on the right and about 8 percent more votes for the average candidate on the left, the study finds. In high-information parliamentary elections, the figure is roughly 14 percent for candidates on both the left and right. 
  
 The researchers also suggest that voters correctly see candidates who are more good looking as more likely to be conservative. When voters don’t know much about candidates, they tend to use beauty as a cue for ideology. 
  
 Here are three ways life is easier for those who have won the genetic lottery. (The Washington Post) 
  
 You might also like: 
  
 The real reason that so many women have to spend so much time getting ready 
  
 When to stop dating and settle down, according to math 
  
 The real reasons you procrastinate — and how to stop |||||
Output:
Beautiful people enjoy a range of benefits in life above and beyond the sheer joy of looking in the mirror. Previous research has found that beauty influences popularity, grades in school, and salary, reports the Washington Post. So it might not be too far a stretch to suggest that beauty plays a role in politics, too. One team of scientists posited that because beautiful people make more money, which makes them "less inclined to support redistribution," it would follow that they'd tend to be more conservative as well. Reporting in the Journal of Public Economics, they say their latest research confirms this. First, researchers showed participants photos of political candidates in Finland, the European Parliament, Australia's House of Representatives, and the US Senate as well as candidates for state governorship. People rated candidates on a 5-point scale, and on all three continents the politicians on the right were rated more beautiful. They also found that without any other information, voters tend to assume that candidates with the so-called "right look" are conservative. Mediaite notes that in the US, the study found that Republicans cared more about candidates' looks than Democrats did, if those voters didn't have much more information about them. (When robots judged a beauty contest, charges of racism ensued.)