You will be given a definition of a task first, then some input of the task.
In this task, you are given a text of many news articles seperated by special token "|||||". Your task is to summarize them.

As the first person to walk on the moon, he is a man whose name will be remembered for generations to come. But one of the other well-known things about Neil Armstrong is that he hardly ever gives interviews. 
  
 It was therefore something of a coup for Alex Malley, chief executive of Certified Practicing Accountants of Australia, to secure almost an hour of Armstrong's time to discuss the astronaut's trip to the moon. 
  
 In the illuminating conversation posted online on the CPA Australia website, Armstrong revealed how he thought his mission, Apollo 11, only had a 50% chance of landing safely on the moon's surface and said it was "sad" that the current US government's ambitions for Nasa were so reduced compared with the achievements of the 1960s. 
  
 "Nasa has been one of the most successful public investments in motivating students to do well and achieve all they can achieve," said Armstrong. "It's sad that we are turning the programme in a direction where it will reduce the amount of motivation and stimulation it provides to young people." 
  
 As a child, Armstrong said he had "become fascinated with the world of flight, as an elementary school student, and determined that, somehow, I wanted to be involved in that." 
  
 He served as a fighter pilot in the Korean war and was working as a test pilot when President John F Kennedy issued his challenge to the country's scientists to land on the moon. "We choose to go the moon and these other things," said Kennedy to an audience at Rice University in 1962, "not because they are easy but because they are hard, because that goal will serve to organise the best of our energies and skills, because that challenge is one that we're willing to accept, one we are unwilling to postpone and one we intend to win." 
  
 At the time, the US had only managed to send Alan Sheppard 100 miles above the surface of the Earth for 20 minutes. "Now the president was challenging us to go to the moon," said Armstrong. "The gap between a 20 minutes up and down flight and going to the moon was something almost beyond belief, technically." 
  
 Over the course of the following decade, each Apollo mission was used to test different parts of the propulsion, navigation and communication technology required on a journey to the moon. 
  
 "A month before the launch of Apollo 11, we decided we were confident enough we could try and attempt on a descent to the surface," said Armstrong. "I thought we had a 90% chance of getting back safely to Earth on that flight but only a 50-50 chance of making a landing on that first attempt. There are so many unknowns on that descent from lunar orbit down to the surface that had not been demonstrated yet by testing and there was a big chance that there was something in there we didn't understand properly and we had to abort and come back to Earth without landing." 
  
 When Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin made their descent aboard the Eagle to the moon's surface, the on-board computer had intended to put them down on the side of a large crater with steep slopes littered with huge boulders. "Not a good place to land at all," said Armstrong. "I took it over manually and flew it like a helicopter out to the west direction, took it to a smoother area without so many rocks and found a level area and was able to get it down there before we ran out of fuel. There was something like 20 seconds of fuel left." 
  
 Once the astronauts had reached the surface and he had muttered his immortal line, "one small step for a man, one giant leap for mankind", Armstrong said there was too much work to do to spend too long meditating or reflecting on where he was. 
  
 In the years since his legendary mission, Armstrong has watched Nasa's position and ambitions erode. "I'm substantially concerned about the policy directions of the space agency, which are directed by the administration," he said. "We have a situation in the states where the White House and the Congress are at odds over what the future direction should be and they're playing a game and Nasa is the shuttlecock they're hitting back and forth as both sides try to get Nasa on the proper path." 
  
 So how did Malley, who was clearly in awe of Armstrong during the interview, manage to land his exclusive? "I know something not a lot of people know about Neil Armstrong – his dad was an auditor," he said. "For people who are leaders or aspire to be leaders, listening to Neil Armstrong is far better than doing any educational MBA programme that exists in the world today." ||||| Armstrong says he hopes man goes back to the moon: He left his camera there.CPA Australia/evoTV 
  
 Astronaut Neil Armstrong stands with Amanda Wright Lane, great-grandniece of the Wright Brothers as they are introduced at the opening program of an exhibit commemorating the 100 year anniversary of the Wright brothers' inaugural flight, Tuesday, July 29, 2003, at in New York's Rockefeller Center. The exhibit, "Centennial of Flight," commemorates innovations in flight made over the last century and will be on display through August 18. (AP Photo/Ed Bailey) 
  
 In a four part interview with Neil Armstrong, the man who stopped the world back in 1969 with his historic walk on the moon, Armstrong talked through those final knuckle-whitening minutes when he realized Eagle's auto-pilot was trying to set them amongst a minefield of slopes and boulders on the lunar surface. 
  
 "Those slopes are steep, the rocks are very large -- the size of automobiles," he told Alex Malley, CEO of accounting firm CPA Australia, narrating over a Google Moon version of the landing. 
  
 Summary Armstrong wraps up four-part interview Discusses moon conspiracy theories Narrates Google Moon version of landing 
  
 "It's certainly not a place where I want to land, so I took over manually from the computer, the auto-pilot. Like a helicopter, on out to the west, to try to find a smoother, more level landing spot." 
  
 Footage shows Commander Armstrong spots a smooth spot other side of crater. 
  
 "I'm running low on fuel. I've got less than two minutes of fuel," he told Malley. 
  
 The actual footage shows Eagle's rocket engine starting to kick up moon dust. Then a 30-second fuel warning pings. 
  
 "I need to get it down here on the ground pretty soon, before we run out," Armstrong said. 
  
 Then a light thump, followed by the immortal words: "Tranquility to base here. The Eagle has landed." 
  
 The interview with the first man to step foot on the moon aired over the past week on Australian television on the CPA Australia-sponsored show “The Bottom Line.” Armstrong is just as famous for his reluctance to talk about his experience, having given the barest handful of television interviews since that landmark day in 1969. 
  
 So how did Australian accountants get to shoot the breeze in a 40-minute one-on-one with one of the most in-demand, yet seldom heard heroes of modern history, Neil Armstrong? 
  
 Malley knew something that a lot of people didn't know about Neil Armstrong, he said: "His dad was an auditor." 
  
 The interview is as much a tribute to Malley's desire to make it happen as it is to the man who stopped the world back in 1969. 
  
 "When I raised the issue of approaching Neil and speaking with him, it became immediately clear how many people thought it couldn't be done,” Malley told news.com.au. "I very much feel my form of leadership is to show people you can do things. CPA Australia talking to Neil Armstrong, I think should be a clear message that anyone to do it." 
  
 'I know that one day somebody's going to fly back up there and pick up that camera I left there.' - Neil Armstrong 
  
 "The most compelling thing I felt about him was his humility -- his commitment to his team, his deference to everyone except himself, his respect for the Russians -- I found that quite extraordinary." 
  
 Even at the age of 82, he's not comfortable in the public spotlight. Last year, his nerves were painfully obvious as he presented an Apollo enthusiast's recreation of the moon landing using Google Moon images to a U.S. House Committee on Space, Science and Technology. 
  
 He's far more relaxed talking Malley through it live. In fact, Commander Armstrong's ease and openness has been a noteworthy feature of the hour-long interview. 
  
 A CPA Australia spokesman said the response to the series has been overwhelming and "growing by the day." 
  
 "We’ve received an extraordinary amount of feedback ... even [from] a number of Neil’s close friends and colleagues who were really pleased to see how relaxed he was in sharing his story publically," he said. 
  
 In the past four weeks, Armstrong has spoke at length about his days in the Air Force, U.S. Government policy, leadership, success and the deaths of former comrades. 
  
 He wound up his final interview by tackling the most controversial issue (yes, Malley went there): Was the moon landing faked? 
  
 Armstrong answers with a chuckle. 
  
 "People love conspiracy theories," he said. 
  
 "They're very attractive, but they were never a concern to me -- because I know that one day somebody's going to fly back up there and pick up that camera I left there." |||||
Output:
Fans of the space program are in for a treat: The normally reticent Neil Armstrong sat down for an hourlong interview about that moon landing of his with, of all outlets, the Certified Practicing Accountants of Australia. Some highlights: 50-50: "I thought we had a 90% chance of getting back safely to Earth on that flight but only a 50-50 chance of making a landing on that first attempt. There were so many unknowns ..." Close call: When Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin descended to the moon's surface in the Eagle, the on-board computer was guiding them toward a rocky, steep area. "Not a good place to land at all," says Armstrong. "I took over manually and flew it like a helicopter out to the west direction, got into a smoother area without so many rocks and found a level area and was able to get it down there safely before we ran out of fuel." There was "something like 20 seconds of fuel left." Conspiracy theorists: Sorry, folks, the landing was real. "People love conspiracy theories ... but they were never a concern to me—because I know that one day somebody's going to fly back up there and pick up that camera I left there." Why open up to accountants? Interviewer Alex Malley, chief executive of CPA Australia, explains his scoop: "I know something not a lot of people know about Neil Armstrong. His dad was an auditor." See the four segments of interviews here, or check out recaps from the Guardian and Fox News.