In this task, you are given a text of many news articles seperated by special token "|||||". Your task is to summarize them.

By most accounts, Amy Bzura and Bradley Moss were looking forward to a happy marriage and long life together. The two were set to marry this past October with friends and family excited to attend the affair. But the two have ended up in a different type of legal arrangement, as Moss is suing Bzura for the return of the $125,000 engagement ring he gave her. 
  
 Photo: Courtesy Bradley Moss/ Facebook More 
  
 As reported in the New York Post, the New York City-based couple had been dating for more than three years when Moss proposed to Bzura on Nov. 7, 2015, according to court documents. That’s when he gave her the square emerald-cut diamond engagement ring, apparently valued at $125,000. They were set to be married on October 29. 
  
 Court documents do not detail why the wedding was cancelled and the engagement was broken, but Moss demanded the return of the ring in early November. According to the Post, “the suit calls for the return of the ring, or its value in cash, with interest, along with punitive damages determined by the court.” 
  
 FindLaw, an online legal resource, points out that relevant gift-giving laws are determined state by state, and most states have adopted a no-fault approach to determining if a betrothed must return an engagement ring. Which means the courts in these states don’t like to get caught up in the whys and wherefores: “They view the relationship as private and therefore none of their business. If the engagement is broken, the giver gets the ring back, regardless of who or why.” That could be bad news for Amy Bzura, as New York is one of these states. ||||| A Manhattan couple are between a rock and a hard place. 
  
 Bradley Moss and Amy Bzura were scheduled to walk down the aisle last month, but never made it to the altar. 
  
 Now the jilted groom wants the $125,000 engagement ring back, but his ex-fiancée vows she won’t return the sparkler, according to a suit filed in Manhattan Supreme Court. 
  
 Moss, 31, and Bzura, 27, began dating in June 2012 and lived together on the East Side for more than three years. On Nov. 7, 2015, Moss proposed to Bzura and she accepted, the court papers said. To her delight, he presented her with a square emerald-cut diamond engagement ring. 
  
 The handsome couple, who registered at Bloomingdale’s, were to be married Oct. 29. 
  
 Friends and family showered the couple with gifts from Vera Wang champagne flutes to Baccarat vases. 
  
 One of Bzura’s friends posted an Instagram photo gushing, “Literally dying to be a real bridesmaid of Amy [and Brad’s] wedding! See you 10/29/16 #amysthemoss.” 
  
 A week before the nuptials were scheduled, Bzura beamed on social media that she could not wait to be Mrs. Moss. She also posted to her Instagram: “I can’t wait to be your nagging and annoying Jewish wife. You mean everything to me and I can’t wait to say ‘I do’ and make you the happiest man in 2016!” 
  
 But for reasons not explained in the suit, “the marriage did not occur.” 
  
 On Nov. 3, Moss wrote Bzura a letter demanding she return the rock. But she “has willfully and maliciously refused,” the suit says. 
  
 The suit calls for the return of the ring, or its value in cash, with interest, along with punitive damages determined by the court. 
  
 Moss, who hails from Woodbury, LI, runs a pipe supply company based out of Lyndhurst, NJ, according to his LinkedIn page. He’s a fitness enthusiast who has run marathons. 
  
 Both Moss and Bzura, an advertising professional formerly of Marlboro, NJ, refused to comment. ||||| Your Registries in One List 
  
 We work with retailers to bring your registries together in one place to make it easy to share and for guests to find. 
  
 With your registries on The Knot, you can |||||
One minute you're registering for monogrammed guest towels and a $1,090 vase; the next, you're embroiled in a lawsuit over a $125,000 engagement ring. Such is the sad story of former Manhattan couple Bradley Moss and Amy Bzura, who were engaged to be married Oct. 29. For reasons not specified in the lawsuit, the wedding did not occur, even though Bzura had posted on Instagram just a week before the nuptials were supposed to take place, "I can't wait to be your nagging and annoying Jewish wife. You mean everything to me." On Nov. 3, Moss asked in a letter to Bzura that the ring be returned, the New York Post reports. She "has willfully and maliciously refused," per the lawsuit Moss then filed. Moss, who runs a pipe supply company, and Bzura, an advertising professional, started dating in June 2012 and cohabitated for more than three years on the East Side. They got engaged on Nov. 7, 2015, which is when the square emerald-cut diamond engagement ring came into play. Moss's lawsuit calls for its return, or for Bzura to pay him its cash value plus interest. The suit also calls for the court to determine additional punitive damages. As Yahoo News reports, New York is a "no-fault" state when it comes to such matters, which likely means Bzura will be required to return the ring even if she's not the one who called off the engagement. (Police say a Florida woman attacked her fiance over a recycled engagement ring.)