In this task, you are given a text of many news articles seperated by special token "|||||". Your task is to summarize them.

Ex Input:
This app has potential! Sure there are some bugs but most apps have that when they first come out. OK so you need wifi for this app, of corse you need that because you can get FULL movies!!! 3G would take for ever!! Think about it!! Stop bashing apps because you are impatient! It would not let me connect several times even though I was on a good connection. I know that will get worked out but you don't see me giving it 1 star! Great app as stated before! Looking forward to updates!! 5 Stars!! 
  
 Goodbye, TV 
  
 by RichardLeis 
  
 The audio/video quality is great. The beginning of a movie or show generally has some audio and stuttering problems, but pausing for a little while seems to help a lot. A few other issues and comments: 
  
  
  
 * You cannot browse a TV series in season and episode order, but if you know the title (or episode number) you can search for a particular episode easily enough. Example: "Naruto 71" found Naruto, episode 71. 
  
 * If you leave a show and return, it will start again from the beginning. 
  
 * Trying to scan forward through a show resulted in a flickering play/pause button and fast forwarding instead of normal playback. 
  
 * I did not see any commercials or pop-ups but I assume these will be added at some point. 
  
 * The app is not tied to your online Joost account. 
  
  
  
 I value portability and touch screen interfaces more than screen size, and suspect that I will make use of Joost on the iPhone much more than this or similar services on my desktop. Frankly, Joost on the iPhone is very exciting. If this is how the revolution in online video is going to evolve, then I gladly give Joost three stars and anticipate frequent updates to improve stability, selection, and browsing ease. 
  
  ||||| These crawls are part of an effort to archive pages as they are created and archive the pages that they refer to. That way, as the pages that are referenced are changed or taken from the web, a link to the version that was live when the page was written will be preserved.Then the Internet Archive hopes that references to these archived pages will be put in place of a link that would be otherwise be broken, or a companion link to allow people to see what was originally intended by a page's authors.The goal is to fix all broken links on the web . Crawls of supported "No More 404" sites. ||||| If there's anything that Apple has been consistent about since launching the iPhone App Store in 2008, it's that it's been wildly inconsistent. 
  
 This past week's new war on porn apps is no different. 
  
 While Apple has booted thousands of sexy iPhone apps from the App Store in the past few days, there are still plenty available for anyone to download. 
  
 What are Apple's guidelines for which porn apps to delete and which to keep? The company has not released any publicly. But one developer says Apple told him that bikini photos, skin, sexual connotations or innuendo, and anything potentially sexually arousing is now forbidden. 
  
 Mmmhmm. Maybe Apple just didn't like his innuendo, sexual connotations, et al. Because a sweep of the App Store this morning turns up plenty of all those things. 
  
 The most obvious belong to Playboy, whose app is still available for purchase. Victoria's Secret, the lingerie company with the famous mail-order catalog, still has an app you can download with video clips with all of the verboten attributes described above. And so on. 
  
 So is Apple giving media companies a free pass while banning indie developers' boob-jiggling apps? 
  
 Seems that way. 
  
 Will Sports Illustrated and GQ and FHM be banned from posting their sexy photos in future iPhone or iPad apps? Or will the magazine industry -- hoping that Apple's iPad and iPhone can help slow its decline -- need to publish Puritan editions to make it past Apple's censors? 
  
 We'll have to wait and see. 
  
 In the meantime... 
  
 Click here to see 10 porn apps you can still download from the App Store → (Warning! Some of these photos may be not safe for work!) ||||| These crawls are part of an effort to archive pages as they are created and archive the pages that they refer to. That way, as the pages that are referenced are changed or taken from the web, a link to the version that was live when the page was written will be preserved.Then the Internet Archive hopes that references to these archived pages will be put in place of a link that would be otherwise be broken, or a companion link to allow people to see what was originally intended by a page's authors.The goal is to fix all broken links on the web . Crawls of supported "No More 404" sites. |||||

Ex Output:
The mystery and irrationality of Apple's approval process for iPhone apps has frustrated would-be developers since the App Store opened—and the latest crackdown on sexually explicit apps is no exception. Apple has done away with many sexy apps recently, telling one developer "bikini photos, skin, sexual connotations or innuendo, and anything potentially sexually arousing is now forbidden." That broad definition seems to be riddled with exceptions, Business Insider reports, including: Playboy Victoria's Secret All Access FHM Joost SI Swimsuit 210 To see the complete list, click here.


Ex Input:
Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer has returned an identical letter that Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell sent to Harry Reid in 2009 on the Cabinet nomination process, calling on Republicans Monday to comply with the same conditions Republicans demanded when it came to President Obama’s nominees. At the time, McConnell was the minority leader and Democrats controlled the nomination process. 
  
 The New York Democrat read the original letter aloud on the Senate floor and posted the returned one on Twitter a day before President-elect Donald Trump’s nominees are set to begin flooding Capitol Hill for their Senate confirmation hearings. 
  
 Our requests are eminently reasonable, shared by leaders of both parties. I'll return this letter to @SenateMajLdr with the same requests. pic.twitter.com/IMT7ZtJFjV — Chuck Schumer (@SenSchumer) January 9, 2017 
  
 The request says that before the consideration of any time agreements for a confirmation vote, Democrats want the following to be complete for each nominee: FBI background checks, Office of Government Ethics office reviews, financial disclosure statements and committee questionnaires. They are also demanding that each nominee has had a hearing, each nominee is willing to engage in committee staff interviews, each nominee agrees to courtesy visits with lawmakers and each nominee has committed to cooperating with the top Democrat on the relevant committees on requests for transparency and information. 
  
 Schumer’s request comes a few days after the director of the Office of Government Ethics sent a letter to Senate Democrats Saturday in which he expressed concerns with Republicans ramming through the confirmation hearings for Mr. Trump’s nominees. 
  
 “It has left some of the nominees with potentially unknown or unresolved ethics issues shortly before their scheduled hearings,” Walter Shaub Jr. wrote in the letter obtained by CBS News. 
  
 He also noted that some of the president-elect’s nominees have not yet completed the office’s full ethics review. On Saturday, The New York Times reported that some of the Cabinet picks had not yet completed their background checks either. 
  
 This comes as Sen. Jeff Sessions, R-Alabama, prepares to testify at his Senate Judiciary Committee confirmation hearing Tuesday for the role of attorney general. Some of the other nominees who will undergo their confirmation hearings this week include Rex Tillerson for secretary of state, Rep. Mike Pompeo for CIA director and a number of other nominees. 
  
 The Associated Press reported that ethics forms are complete and submitted for Sessions, Tillerson, Defense Secretary nominee Gen. James Mattis and Transportation Secretary nominee Elaine Chao. 
  
 CBS News’ Reena Flores contributed. ||||| "I only ask respectfully that the Republican majority follow the same set of standards they had in 2009 when the shoe was on the other foot," Sen. Chuck Schumer said. | AP Photo Schumer threatens Trump Cabinet confirmation delays 
  
 Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer offered an explicit warning to Republicans on Monday, saying Democrats are willing to slow down confirmation hearings for Donald Trump's Cabinet until potential nominees finish independent ethics reviews. 
  
 Democrats cannot stop Trump's Cabinet with filibusters, thanks to a rules change they pushed through in 2013, but they can prolong the process for weeks by forcing the GOP to burn through extra time before final floor votes are scheduled. Schumer suggested that such a delay could be in the offing. 
  
 Story Continued Below 
  
 "To spend an extra day or two on each nominee; even if it takes several weeks to get through them all in order to carefully consider their nominations…that’s well worth it," he said. 
  
 Schumer read aloud on the Senate floor from a letter that Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) sent in February 2009 asking for President Barack Obama's nominees to only receive hearings after the independent Office of Government Ethics and FBI finish vetting their backgrounds. The New York Democrat said the GOP should take the same approach to Trump's would-be Cabinet — several members of which have yet to finish their OGE ethics reviews. 
  
 And shortly afterward, the Democratic leader sent a copy of the letter back to McConnell, after scratching out the original recipients and scrawling "Mitch" instead. 
  
 "I only ask respectfully that the Republican majority follow the same set of standards they had in 2009 when the shoe was on the other foot," Schumer said. "Especially because these nominees raise particular concerns." 
  
 Notably, McConnell sent his 2009 letter, which one source told POLITICO did not receive a response at the time from then-Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.), weeks after the Senate confirmed seven senior Obama nominees on his first day in office. The Kentucky Republican has called for a similar pace for Trump's Cabinet, telling reporters at Trump Tower on Monday that he wants to see upwards of a half-dozen nominees confirmed on Inauguration Day, and on Sunday urged Democrats to "grow up." 
  
 Nine members of Trump's prospective Cabinet are set to receive confirmation hearings this week, with OGE ethics reviews still unreleased for four of them — Education Secretary pick Betsy DeVos, Commerce Secretary pick Wilbur Ross, Housing and Urban Development pick Ben Carson, and retired Gen. John Kelly, the president-elect's Department of Homeland Security pick. 
  
 Burgess Everett contributed reporting. |||||

Ex Output:
In 2009, then-Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell sent then-Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid a letter asking that President Obama's Cabinet nominees not be granted Senate confirmation hearings until the Office of Government Ethics and the FBI had vetted them and other ethical review steps had been taken. On Monday, current Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer sent the same letter back to McConnell, after writing "Mitch" in the recipient field and crossing out Reid, the original recipient—CBS has a picture. Schumer also read the letter out loud on the Senate floor, as a warning to Republicans that, now that the Democrats are the underdogs, they're willing to take the same steps Republicans did years ago to slow down confirmation hearings, Politico reports. The request comes days after the Office of Government Ethics sent a letter to Senate Democrats airing concerns that Republicans are pushing through the confirmation process—nine of Trump's Cabinet nominees have confirmation hearings scheduled this week, even though the OGE has not released ethics reviews yet for four of them. "To spend an extra day or two on each nominee; even if it takes several weeks to get through them all in order to carefully consider their nominations ... that’s well worth it," Schumer said on the Senate floor Monday. "I only ask respectfully that the Republican majority follow the same set of standards they had in 2009 when the shoe was on the other foot. Especially because these nominees raise particular concerns." McConnell on Sunday pooh-poohed the OGE's concerns.


Ex Input:
Is she or isn’t she? 
  
 TMZ reported Tuesday that Lindsay Lohan is engaged to boyfriend Egor Tarabasov after he popped the question over the weekend, but a rep for the actress tells Page Six the report is “not true and holds no merit.” 
  
 If news of an engagement seems quick, that’s because the “Mean Girls” star, 29, and the 22-year-old Russian started dating only five months ago. 
  
 As fast as the couple may have moved, the actress’ mother certainly won’t mind. She’s already made clear that she’s quite the fan of the young real estate agent. 
  
 “He’s just a sweetheart,” Dina Lohan told Page Six last month. “He’s an only child and I just FaceTimed with them and his mom a few days ago. He’s cool and he’s very mature for his age. He’s older than his years. Being an only child and traveling the world educates you in other ways. He’s not about celebrity or anything, which is really important.” 
  
 Apparently, Tarabasov is one of the few things Lindsay’s parents can agree on, as her father, Michael, also feels good about the couple. 
  
 “He has a lot of strong connections in Russia — these are big people and they’re very supportive,” he said last month. “He wants things to be in the right place for Lindsay and he’s wise beyond his years.” ||||| Lindsay Lohan I'm Engaged!!! 
  
 Lindsay Lohan Is Engaged!!! 
  
 EXCLUSIVE 
  
 From Russia with love -- Lindsay Lohan is engaged to be married to her 22-year-old boyfriend. 
  
 We're told Russian heir Egor Tarabasov popped the question over the weekend, and LiLo said ... Da. 
  
 As we've told you ... 29-year-old Lindsay and Egor started dating about 5 months ago, and got serious pretty quickly. Egor spent the holidays in NY with the Lohan fam, who gave him the stamp of approval. 
  
 Egor, whose father is a multi-millionaire businessman, met Linds through mutual friends at a party. 
  
 Congrats! ||||| Starting in 1996, Alexa Internet has been donating their crawl data to the Internet Archive. Flowing in every day, these data are added to the Wayback Machine after an embargo period. |||||

Ex Output:

Turns out Lindsay Lohan isn't engaged after all. TMZ reported Tuesday that Lohan's boyfriend, Russian heir Egor Tarabasov, had proposed over the weekend, but LiLo's rep now tells People, "The story is untrue and holds no merit." (As of Tuesday night, TMZ was sticking to its guns, reporting that LiLo was sporting an emerald-and-diamond engagement ring.) Lohan, 29, and Tarabasov, a 22-year-old whose businessman father is a multi-millionaire, have been dating about eight months, per People, and have recently moved in together. Tarabasov also spent the holidays in New York with Lohan and her family, per Page Six. "He’s older than his years. Being an only child and traveling the world educates you in other ways," Lindsay's mom, Dina, told Page Six last month. Dad Michael's take, around the same time: "He has a lot of strong connections in Russia—these are big people and they’re very supportive."


