You will be given a definition of a task first, then some input of the task.
In this task, you are given a text of many news articles seperated by special token "|||||". Your task is to summarize them.

It's a free speech, tug of war, that played out in a Youngstown courtroom Friday morning when a black attorney refused to remove a 'Black Lives Matter' button. 
  
 The handcuffs are now off and Attorney Andrea Burton plans to appeal her 5-day jail sentence for refusing to remove a 'Black Lives Matter' button in Youngstown Municipal Court. 
  
 Judge Robert Milich reportedly gave her several chances to comply, but then ordered that Burton be held in contempt of court, handcuffed and taken to jail. 
  
 "He indicated to me he didn't know if I was trying to seek attention from the news or whatever the case was, but that legally I wasn't allowed to wear it and I deferred and said that I'm respecting my First Amendment right. That I'm not neutral in injustice, and to remain neutral becomes an accomplice to oppression, Attorney Burton said. 
  
 The Youngstown woman's attorneys asked that the Judge stay her sentence so that she could appeal, and he eventually sent out an order allowing her to be released pending an Appeals Court decision. 
  
 But Burton's release comes with the following conditions: She will have to comply with the dress code of the Youngstown Municipal Court. Burton also can not wear or exhibit a 'Black Lives Matter' or any other political badge or pin in Youngstown Municipal Court or the courtroom halls. 
  
 "It's an act of civil disobedience I understand that. I'm not anti-police I work with law enforcement and I hold them in the highest regard, and just to say for the record I do believe all lives matter. But at this point they don't all matter equally, and that's a problem in the justice system," Burton said. 
  
 Judge Milich would not do an interview because the case is headed to the Appeals Court. However, he does say he can't let someone demonstrate a viewpoint in a court that is supposed to be fair and impartial. 
  
 21 News also found case law from the Supreme Court that says Judges do have the right to ban political expressions from the courtroom. 
  
  
  
 Attorney Burton argues her First Amendment right overides that. 
  
 The local NAACP has contacted the legal division of the national NAACP, and they say they will monitor this case very closely, because Attorney Burton's civil rights may have been violated. ||||| YOUNGSTOWN, Ohio (WKBN) – An attorney was removed from court and taken into custody after a judge declared her in contempt for refusing to take off a Black Lives Matter pin. 
  
 Youngstown Municipal Court Judge Robert Milich said Attorney Andrea Burton was in contempt of court for refusing to remove the pin in his courtroom as instructed. Burton was sentenced to five days in jail, but she has been released on a stay while an appeal is underway. 
  
 Burton will stay out of jail during the appeals process as long as she obeys Milich’s order not to wear items that make a political statement in court. If she loses her appeal, she will have to serve the five days in jail. 
  
 Milich said his opinions have nothing to do with his decision. 
  
 “A judge doesn’t support either side,” he said. “A judge is objective and tries to make sure everyone has an opportunity to have a fair hearing, and it was a situation where it was just in violation of the law,” he said. 
  
 The Youngstown branch of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) said its legal counsel is monitoring the case closely as it may violate Burton’s civil rights. 
  
 A statement issued Friday from Youngstown NAACP President George Freeman, Jr. questioned whether Burton had violated the law. He has contacted the national NAACP’s legal office for assistance. 
  
 “We will do all that the NAACP Youngstown can do to ensure that Attorney Burton’s Constitutional rights are not being violated,” he said. 
  
 Attorney and community activist Kim Akins said she is worried about what happened. 
  
 “No one wearing an American flag button, no one wearing a crucifix or a Star of David would be removed, so why this particular statement bothered him so much is bothersome,” she said. 
  
 The judge said his ruling is based on Supreme Court case law in which a judge can prohibit symbolic political expression in courtrooms, even if it’s not disruptive. 
  
 “There’s a difference between a flag, a pin from your church or the Eagles and having a pin that’s on a political issue,” Milich said. 
  
 Legal analysts say judges have free reign when it comes to what’s said, or worn, in their courtrooms. 
  
 “The judge has the right in any circumstance that they think that some issue or matter will be disruptive to the court or a distraction to the court, they can ask that individual to remove that object,” said Matt Mangino. 
  
 Mike Brickner, senior policy director for the American Civil Liberties Union of Ohio, said he didn’t know enough about the particular case to comment on it, but in general, judges are given a wide latitude in determining what can be worn in a courtroom. 
  
 “There have been cases in the past when people have been given contempt of court for refusing to comply with a judge’s order to remove an article of clothing that may have a message on it. Many times this has been done to retain the defendant’s right to a fair trial,” Brickner said via email Friday. 
  
 Brickner said, however, a judge’s restrictions on what people may wear must be reasonable and fairly applied. 
  
 When contacted Friday, Burton and her attorney refused to comment on the case. |||||
Output:
An "act of civil disobedience" resulted in a Youngstown, Ohio, attorney being handcuffed and sentenced to five days in jail for contempt of court. Andrea Burton on Friday morning refused to comply with a judge's order that she remove a "Black Lives Matter" button that she was wearing, WFMJ reports. After giving her several chances to remove the button, Judge Robert Milich had Burton cuffed and taken to jail. She's out now, pending an appeal. "I'm not anti-police," Burton tells WFMJ, "I work with law enforcement and I hold them in the highest regard, and just to say for the record I do believe all lives matter. But at this point they don't all matter equally, and that's a problem in the justice system." The local NAACP tells WKBN that it is keeping a close eye on the situation because it may violate Burton's civil rights. An ACLU representative says holding someone in contempt of court for refusing to remove an article of clothing is not unheard of, adding, "Many times this has been done to retain the defendant’s right to a fair trial.” As for Milich, he says it's just a matter of following the law. “A judge doesn’t support either side,” he tells WKBN. “A judge is objective and tries to make sure everyone has an opportunity to have a fair hearing, and it was a situation where it was just in violation of the law."