In this task, you are given a text of many news articles seperated by special token "|||||". Your task is to summarize them.

Q: The good news: we’re getting more Arrested Development! The (potentially!) bad news: we’re getting more Arrested Development. 
  
 After years of negotiations, teases, and knowing deferrals—as Ron Howard told Vanity Fair just last month, “I don’t want to be coy, but, well, I’m absolutely being coy!”—Netflix has finally announced that a fifth season of the beloved sitcom will premiere sometime in 2018. “In talks with Netflix we all felt that stories about a narcissistic, erratically behaving family in the building business—and their desperate abuses of power—are really underrepresented on TV these days,” series creator Mitchell Hurwitz said in a statement, perhaps hinting at a topical direction for the new episodes. The entire original cast is slated to return once more, though the announcement doesn’t indicate how many episodes the new season will contain, or when, precisely, it will debut. 
  
 Longtime Arrested Development fans will likely find themselves reacting to this news with a mixture of enthusiasm and trepidation. The fourth season of Arrested Development, which debuted in 2013, was a classic “be careful what you wish for” scenario: though the original series was clever and sharp and unfairly cut down in its prime, its revival—the first such series Netflix ever attempted, which means you can thank it for Fuller House—was a decidedly mixed bag. Arrested Development’s intricately plotted episodes and penchant for long-running, big-payoff gags made it the perfect match for the nascent binge-watch era, which is precisely why it won over so many fans after its original cancelation. But the new series faced daunting scheduling issues, thanks to the booming careers of its sprawling ensemble cast, which led to meandering episodes that focused on one character at a time rather than the ensemble pieces that had been the original show’s bread and butter. 
  
 Will a new season be able to clear a similar hurdle? Arrested’s alumni certainly haven’t gotten any less busy: Tony Hale and Jeffrey Tambor have starring roles on Veep and Transparent, respectively; Jason Bateman's making movies; Portia de Rossi has a recurring role on Scandal; Alia Shawkat is readying herself for another season of TBS’s delightful Search Party. If the new season still has trouble getting all of these people in the same studio at the same time, it seems likely that Arrested Season 5 will suffer the same creative issues that muddled Season 4. At the very least, the show seems to be aware of what prevented it from hitting again last time—its official Twitter account broke the news of Arrested’s return with a message that indicates the new season will feature the Bluths “all together. Whether they like it or not.” 
  
 Maybe, then, the show has learned from its past mistakes—and if nothing else, it’ll hopefully find a way to skewer the Donald Trump era just as mercilessly as it lampooned the presidency of George W. Bush. The rest of Hurwitz’s statement certainly seems like a step in the right direction: “I am so grateful to them and to 20th TV for making this dream of mine come true in bringing the Bluths, George Sr., Lucille and the kids; Michael, Ivanka, Don Jr., Eric, George-Michael, and who am I forgetting, oh Tiffany. Did I say Tiffany?—back to the glorious stream of life.” 
  
 Do you have what it takes? 
  
 Test your knowledge of the Seven Kingdoms with Vanity Fair ’s Game of Unknowns. 
  
 Make your predictions ||||| The Bluth family's antics are coming back to Netflix. The streaming service announced Wednesday that Arrested Development will return for its fifth season in 2018. The show is one of Rolling Stone's 100 Greatest TV Shows of All Time. 
  
 Related 100 Greatest TV Shows of All Time From time-capsule sitcoms to cutting-edge Peak-TV dramas — the definitive ranking of the game-changing small-screen classics 
  
 After three critically acclaimed, but low-rated, seasons on Fox from 2004 to 2006, Mitch Hurwitz's cult comedy series was revived by Netflix in 2013, with the entire regular cast uniting for Season Four. Hurwitz and the original cast will again return for Season Five, which was delayed until all the talent involved could fit Arrested Development into their schedules, Variety reports. 
  
 "In talks with Netflix we all felt that that stories about a narcissistic, erratically behaving family in the building business — and their desperate abuses of power — are really underrepresented on TV these days,” Hurwitz said in a statement, shading the Trump clan. "I am so grateful to them and to 20th TV for making this dream of mine come true in bringing the Bluths, George Sr., Lucille and the kids; Michael, Ivanka, Don Jr., Eric, George-Michael, and who am I forgetting, oh Tiffany. Did I say Tiffany? — back to the glorious stream of life." 
  
 Ron Howard, who produces and narrates the series, added in a statement, "Whew! I can finally answer the question … Hell yes! Warming up my uncredited narrator vocal chords. Now the only thing I will have to be coy about is all the craziness the Bluths are going to face this season." 
  
 The confirmation of Arrested Development's fifth season comes less than a week after star Jason Bateman tweeted, "Look very probable I'm going to put some miles on the Stair Car this summer. Just officially signed on to more ARRESTED DEVELOPMENT today." |||||

A: Arrested Development will be back for a fifth season. Netflix, which revived the beloved sitcom for a fourth season in 2013, confirmed Wednesday that the series' fifth season will air on the streaming service in 2018. The original cast and creator Mitch Hurwitz are once again returning, Rolling Stone reports. Reaction so far is mixed; for example, Vanity Fair wonders whether a fifth season "can erase the memory of season 4."
****
Q: A sophisticated worm designed to infiltrate industrial control systems could be used as a blueprint to sabotage machines that are critical to U.S. power plants, electrical grids and other infrastructure, experts are warning. 
  
 The discovery of Stuxnet, which some analysts have called the "malware of the century" because of its ability to damage or possibly destroy sensitive control systems, has served as a wake-up call to industry officials. Even though the worm has not yet been found in control systems in the United States, it could be only a matter of time before similar threats show up here. 
  
 "Quite honestly you've got a blueprint now," said Michael J. Assante, former chief security officer at the North American Electric Reliability Corporation, an industry body that sets standards to ensure the electricity supply. "A copycat may decide to emulate it, maybe to cause a pressure valve to open or close at the wrong time. You could cause damage, and the damage could be catastrophic." 
  
 Joe Weiss, an industrial control system security specialist and managing partner at Applied Control Solutions in Cupertino, Calif., said "the really scary part" about Stuxnet is its ability to determine what "physical process it wants to blow up." Said Weiss: "What this is is essentially a cyber weapon." 
  
 Researchers still do not know who created Stuxnet or why. 
  
 The antivirus security firm Symantec analyzed the worm this summer and, by taking control of servers it had been connected to, determined that the malware had infected 45,000 computers around the world. Most of those infected - 30,000 - were in Iran. Those computers were not the targets, but the finding suggested that the target was nearby. 
  
 Speculation has focused on Iran's nuclear enrichment facilities, and this weekIranian officials said they suspect a foreign organization or nation designed the worm. 
  
 The United States has a covert program to sabotage the systems that undergird Iran's nuclear facilities. Some experts have also suggested that other countries, including Israel, could be behind Stuxnet. 
  
 Joel F. Brenner, former national counterintelligence executive and a former senior counsel at the National Security Agency, said he thinks it is unlikely that the United States created the worm. "We don't do anything on purpose that we can't really target and control," he said. 
  
 Brenner, who has long warned of such a threat to the electric grids, also cautioned against assuming a nation state was behind it. A group at a "premier technical institute" in the United States, China, Israel or Russia, could have carried it off, he said. 
  
 Siemens, a German-headquartered multinational company, has identified 15 cases of infections on customers' plants worldwide; the single largest concentration - five - was found in Germany. Each customer was able to detect the worm and remove it without harm to their operations, spokesman Alexander Machowetz said. 
  
 Still, the possibility that Stuxnet could be used by copycats, even those who don't intend to do harm with it, is causing concern among experts. ||||| Iran has detained several "spies" it claims were behind cyber attacks on its nuclear programme. 
  
 The intelligence minister, Heydar Moslehi, said western "spy services" were behind the complex computer virus that recently infected more than 30,000 computers in industrial sites, including those in the Bushehr nuclear power plant, appearing to confirm the suspicion of computer security experts that a foreign state was responsible. 
  
 The announcement also suggests that the attack involving the Stuxnet worm virus, which computer experts believe may have been designed to spy on Iran's nuclear facilities rather than destroy them, has caused more alarm in the regime than has so far been acknowledged. 
  
 In remarks carried on Iranian state television and the Mehr news service, Moslehi said Iran had discovered the "destructive activities of the arrogance [of the west] in cyberspace", adding that "different ways to confront them have been designed and implemented". 
  
 "I assure all citizens that the intelligence apparatus currently has complete supervision on cyberspace and will not allow any leak or destruction of our country's nuclear activities. 
  
 "Iran's intelligence department has found a solution for confronting [the worm] and it will be applied. Our domination of virtual networks has thwarted the activities of enemies in this regard." 
  
 Moslehi gave no details of when the arrests had taken place or whether those detained were Iranians or foreign citizens. 
  
 According to experts the Stuxnet worm, designed to be delivered through a removable drive like a USB stick, is one of the most complex pieces of malicious code ever deployed. It was written specifically to attack Siemens industrial control units of the kind used in the Iranian nuclear programme. 
  
 Suspicion for responsibilty for the attack has inevitably focused on Israel and the US, although there is little evidence to support this. 
  
 The announcement of the arrests, intended to reassure Iranians, follows comments last week by another senior Iranian official, Mahmoud Liaii, who said: "An electronic war has been launched against Iran." 
  
 Iran has denied that the worm damaged the main control systems at Bushehr, rather infecting the laptops of some workers at the plant. However, the disclosure of the attack coincided with an announcement that the plant's inauguration has been delayed until at least next year because of continuing technical problems. 
  
 It was confirmed earlier this week that Iran will start fuelling the Bushehr nuclear reactor with enriched uranium fuel over the next few days, months later than had been originally announced. 
  
 The vice-president, Ali Akbar Salehi, maintained the delay had nothing to do with the computer worm and said the plant had not been affected in any way. 
  
 "We hope to load the fuel into the Bushehr reactor by early October and the necessary groundwork for this is coming together, God willing, so it [the fuel] will be completely put in place in the heart [of the reactor] by November," he told the semi-official ISNA news agency. 
  
 In recent years Iran has announced the arrest of nuclear spies on a periodic basis. Three years ago it announced it had broken up a spy ring that had handed nuclear intelligence to the UK. |||||

A: Iran sought to reassure its residents today that the nation's nuclear programs are safe from Stuxnet, which might be the scariest computer virus known to man. The intelligence chief said authorities had arrested "nuclear spies," though he didn't say who, how many, or where they're from, reports the Guardian. He did, however, blame western "spy services" for the highly sophisticated bug, which has infected 30,000 computers at industrial sites—including the Bushehr nuclear reactor. "Iran's intelligence department has found a solution for confronting [the worm] and it will be applied," he said. "Our domination of virtual networks has thwarted the activities of enemies in this regard." The announcement could be a sign that the worm has inflicted more damage than the regime has acknowledged, notes the Guardian. The bug also has been found in India, Pakistan, and Indonesia, but so far not in the US. Still, it could provide a "blueprint" for attacks on computers critical to US power plants and electrical grids. See the Washington Post for more on that.
****
Q: President Donald Trump has two “finalists” for his Supreme Court nomination -- and both of them will be at the White House tonight. 
  
 A administration source with knowledge of the situation told CBS News that both Colorado-based Judge Neil Gorsuch and Pennsylvania-based Judge Thomas Hardiman will be at the White House Tuesday. Mr. Trump is expected to formally announce his pick at 8 p.m. ET. 
  
 Judge Thomas Hardiman of Pennsylvania (left), Judge Neil Gorsuch of Colorado (right) AP 
  
 If confirmed by the Senate, the nominee would fill the Supreme Court seat left vacant by the late Justice Antonin Scalia, who suddenly died last February. 
  
 President Obama had nominated Judge Merrick Garland to the bench, but Senate Republicans refused to consider his nomination because they wanted the outcome of the election to determine the high court’s future. 
  
 Originally, the president’s announcement was supposed to come later in the week. The pick will be rolled out amid backlash from the executive order the president signed Friday that has blocked all travel to the U.S. from seven predominantly Muslim countries. ||||| Story highlights Judges Neil Gorsuch and Thomas Hardiman were the favorites for Trump's Supreme Court nomination 
  
 (CNN) In the end, Judge Thomas Hardiman only drove a few hours east of Pittsburgh. 
  
 "The reality is that to the best of my knowledge he never left the state of Pennsylvania," White House spokesman Sean Spicer said Tuesday night after the announcement. "He never was in DC, nor did he ever leave the commonwealth." 
  
 The Trump administration was taking extraordinary measures to build suspense and keep the final selection for its Supreme Court nominee under wraps for as close to the announcement as possible. Hardiman and Neil Gorsuch, both federal appellate judges, were the established favorites. 
  
 Gorsuch got the nod at the White House Tuesday night, and it turns out Hardiman never made it to Washington. 
  
 White House sources acknowledged Tuesday night they left the impression with reporters that he was coming to Washington. Hardiman appeared to play along. One source said Hardiman was given the sense that there could be a spot for him should another vacancy open up. 
  
 Read More |||||

A:
President Trump's announcement of his Supreme Court nominee—scheduled for 8pm Eastern—could have the feel of a reality show to it. CNN reports leading contenders Neil Gorsuch and Thomas Hardiman were both brought to Washington DC ahead of the announcement. Furthermore, an inside source says both "finalists" will be at the White House for Trump's announcement, according to CBS News. CNN was told by someone close to the White House that the Trump administration is "taking extraordinary measures to build suspense" for the announcement. In fact, the announcement was moved up in the week as Trumps executive order on immigration and refugees continued to negatively dominate headlines. Gorsuch is said to be Trump's likely choice.
****
