In this task, you are given a text of many news articles seperated by special token "|||||". Your task is to summarize them.

When Amazon launched its Amazon Key service last month, it also offered a remedy for anyone—realistically, most people—who might be creeped out that the service gives random strangers unfettered access to your home. That security antidote? An internet-enabled camera called Cloud Cam, designed to sit opposite your door and reassuringly record every Amazon Key delivery. 
  
 But now security researchers have demonstrated that with a simple program run from any computer in Wi-Fi range, that camera can be not only disabled but frozen. A viewer watching its live or recorded stream sees only a closed door, even as their actual door is opened and someone slips inside. That attack would potentially enable rogue delivery people to stealthily steal from Amazon customers, or otherwise invade their inner sanctum. 
  
 And while the threat of a camera-hacking courier seems an unlikely way for your house to be burgled, the researchers argue it potentially strips away a key safeguard in Amazon's security system. When WIRED brought the research to Amazon's attention, the company responded that it plans to send out an automatic software update to address the issue later this week. 
  
 "The camera is very much something Amazon is relying on in pitching the security of this as a safe solution," says Ben Caudill, the founder of the Seattle-based security firm Rhino Security Labs, whose researchers discovered and demonstrated the Amazon Key attack. "Disabling that camera on command is a pretty powerful capability when you’re talking about environments where you’re relying heavily on that being a critical safety mechanism." 
  
 Key Master 
  
 The Rhino Labs proof-of-concept attack on Amazon Key is relatively simple. In their demonstration, shown in the video above, a delivery person unlocks the door with their Amazon Key app, opens the door, drops off a package, and then closes the door behind them. Normally, they'd then lock the door with their app. In this attack, they instead run a program on their laptop—or, Rhino's researchers suggest, on a simple handheld device anyone could build using a Raspberry Pi minicomputer and an antenna—that sends a series of "deauthorization" commands to the home's Cloud Cam. 
  
 That so-called deauth technique isn't exactly a software bug in Cloud Cam. It's an issue for practically all Wi-Fi devices, one that allows anyone to spoof a command from a Wi-Fi router that temporarily kicks a device off the network. In this case, Rhino's script sends the command again and again, to keep the camera offline as long as the script is running. Most disturbingly, Amazon's camera doesn't respond to that attack by going dark or alerting the user that the camera is offline. Instead, it continues to show any live viewer—or anyone watching back a recording—the last frame the camera saw when it was connected. 
  
 'Disabling that camera on command is a pretty powerful capability.' Ben Caudill, Rhino Labs 
  
 That means the deauth command sent by the delivery-person-turned-hacker standing just outside your door can freeze the camera on the image of a closed door, while he then waltzes in a second time and closes the door behind them. Once inside, the intruder can simply move beyond the view of the Cloud Cam, stop sending the deauth command to allow the camera to reconnect, and hit the lock button on their app. Neither the lock's logs nor the video record would appear amiss to the Amazon Key user, even as a stranger runs amok inside their house. 
  
 "As a partially trusted Amazon delivery person, you can compromise the security of anyone's house you have temporary access to without any logs or entries that would be unusual or suspicious," Caudill says. 
  
 "We currently notify customers if the camera is offline for an extended period," Amazon said in a statement. "Later this week we will deploy an update to more quickly provide notifications if the camera goes offline during delivery." 
  
 The company nonetheless downplayed the likelihood of its delivery staff actually exploiting Rhino's technique, and noted that it doesn't allow any staffer to unlock a door without being authorized to deliver a package at a certain address and time, even if the camera is disabled. Amazon also pointed out that it offers a Happiness Guarantee, and claimed—without any direct evidence—that it would be able to immediately identify any driver that did use the trick to break into someone's house. 
  
 "Every delivery driver passes a comprehensive background check that is verified by Amazon before they can make in-home deliveries, every delivery is connected to a specific driver, and before we unlock the door for a delivery, Amazon verifies that the correct driver is at the right address, at the intended time," the company's statement reads. 
  
 To Amazon's point, any delivery person who does exploit that trick for thievery or spying would still face some serious challenges. They'd be the prime suspect, so to speak, for any obvious burglary of the house, so they'd have to limit their crimes to subtler thefts, like copying sensitive documents for identity theft. And of course, they'd also have to find another way out of the house, since they'll have locked the front door behind them. 
  
 "At the point where you’re clever enough to do this, that’s the easy part of the problem," Caudill argues. 
  
 A Separate Attack 
  
 Rhino's researchers also point out that when their attack kicks a Cloud Cam off the network, it also disconnects the Amazon Key lock on the door, too. That's because the lock doesn't actually have its own internet connection. Instead, it communicates via the Zigbee wireless protocol to the Cloud Cam, which acts as its connection to the Wi-Fi router and the rest of the internet. 
  
 The researchers argue that this could enable a separate attack as well. In that scenario, a hacker follows an Amazon delivery person around and waits for them to make a delivery. Just as they're closing the door to leave, the hacker triggers the deauth command, knocking Amazon Key offline and preventing the door from locking. When the delivery person leaves, the hacker then breaks into the home through the unlocked door. 
  
 But that attack, while open to a far wider collection of potential hackers than the rogue delivery person scenario, is even less likely to succeed. The delivery person would have to be rushed or careless enough to not pull on the door to check that it was locked, and to not notice that their app showed an extended "locking" status message, a spinning icon, and then a timeout error. Amazon notes that its delivery people are told never to leave a house when its door is unlocked, and that the company will also call a customer immediately if it sees that their door is left unlocked for more than several minutes. 
  
 Caudill concedes that a rogue delivery person disabling someone's camera constitutes a more practical attack. And while he notes that an Amazon software update changes how an Amazon Key camera alerts customers that it's offline could limit the problem, he also argues that a full fix would require caching a certain amount of recording locally even when it's not connected to the internet, so that any mischievous door-opening is still captured even when the camera's offline. 
  
 Anything short of a compete fix, Caudill says, will only have even more serious implications as Amazon opens up Amazon Key to other services in the coming months. The company has said it plans to integrate the feature with cleaning service Merry Maids, dog-walking service Rover, and more. 
  
 In the meantime, wary users should consider setting up another, separate security camera as a backup for Amazon's Cloud Cam. They could, hypothetically, place a clock or other moving object in the frame of the Cloud Cam's view, so that any freezing of the image would become immediately apparent. Or Caudill offers a harsher but far simpler solution: "Don't use Amazon Key." ||||| A Seattle cybersecurity firm has demonstrated a way to knock Amazon's new security camera offline, effectively disabling the security feature the company built to reassure users of its new Amazon Key in-home delivery service. 
  
 A Seattle-based group of cybersecurity researchers has demonstrated a way to knock Amazon’s new security camera offline, a capability that could enable malicious delivery drivers for the online retailer’s new in-home delivery service to snoop around a house undetected. 
  
 Amazon Key, which became available to customers last week, gives Amazon delivery drivers one-time access to a residence to drop off a package. The program, designed to eliminate the theft of packages left outside a home and to open up the potential for remote authorization of other home services, is a test of whether consumers trust Amazon enough to give the online retailer access to the front door. 
  
 It relies on two pieces of hardware: a smart lock, and Cloud Cam, which communicates with Amazon’s servers to authorize the driver to unlock the door, and then records the delivery, beaming live or recorded video to a smartphone app to give the homeowner peace of mind. 
  
 Rhino Security Labs, a security research outfit based in Capitol Hill, showed that it could exploit a weakness in the Wi-Fi protocol that Cloud Cam and many other devices use to communicate with their router. A savvy hacker within Wi-Fi range can send a series of “deauthorization” commands to a specific device, temporarily severing its link to the internet. 
  
 In the case of Amazon’s Cloud Cam, that means the camera would stop recording and sending images to Amazon’s servers. A delivery driver who had already received approval to unlock the front door could, before exiting and locking the door, roam inside without being recorded. Or, as demonstrated in a video posted by Rhino, leave the home and re-enter undetected. 
  
 Part of the problem, Rhino Chief Executive Benjamin Caudill said, is that during such internet interruptions, Cloud Cam doesn’t immediately go dark or tell the user it is offline. The company’s test instead shows that the Cloud Cam smartphone app displays a still frame of the last image the camera saw before losing its connection, which could give the impression the device was functioning properly. 
  
 “You can do this multiple times over without any sort of alert or log at all,” he said in an interview. “Now I, as a bad guy, have blocked the signal and blocked your camera, and, unless you are specifically thinking this is an attack, there’s no way for you to verify that this had happened,” said Caudill, whose findings were reported earlier Thursday by Wired. 
  
 Amazon said in a statement that safety and security “are built into every aspect of the service,” and reiterated that Amazon Key’s delivery drivers, employed by contracting firms, have to pass comprehensive background checks. 
  
 “Every delivery is connected to a specific driver, and before we unlock the door for a delivery, Amazon verifies that the correct driver is at the right address, at the intended time,” the company said. 
  
 Still, Amazon said it planned to roll out a software update this week that will notify customers sooner if the camera goes offline during a delivery. 
  
 The company said its initial read on Rhino’s findings were that they posed little risk to customers. The Wi-Fi vulnerability cannot unlock the front door, for instance, and if a driver does act maliciously, Amazon would have a record of the individual and their vehicle. The company also reiterated the guarantee it offers for home services — a broad pledge to help make things right if customers file a claim after something goes wrong. 
  
 Still, the discovery is a reminder that internet-connected devices like the Cloud Cam can be exploited by bad actors. 
  
 Some were skeptical of Amazon Key when it was introduced, raising the prospect of theft, damage to a home or lost pets. 
  
 Research firm Morning Consult found that 68 percent of U.S. adults it surveyed said they were not comfortable letting delivery drivers have access to their home. Young people, the survey found, were most comfortable with the idea, with 33 percent of the 18- to 29-year-old cohort saying they were comfortable with the idea, compared to just 14 percent of the over-65 bracket. 
  
 Amazon has a generally good reputation for cybersecurity, Caudill said, particularly for its cloud computing arm, Amazon Web Services. 
  
 But some in the security community were wary when Amazon Key was announced. “So we kind of set out fairly quickly to provide some tangible details” on the service’s security, he said. 
  
 Caudill said the issue his team identified could be remedied if Cloud Cam stored footage on the device itself if it lost internet connectivity. The camera’s video recordings are stored now only on Amazon’s servers for between 24 hours and 30 days, depending on a customer’s subscription plan. 
  
 Securing the growing array of internet-connected devices, from security cameras to stoves and garage-door openers, represents the biggest cybersecurity challenge since the advent of smartphones, Caudill said. “I think people are almost constantly taking risks they don’t realize, because they think things like this don’t happen,” he said. |||||
A recent survey of US adults found 68% weren't comfortable giving delivery drivers access to their homes to leave packages inside, as happens with Amazon's new service, the Seattle Times reports. That number may soon go up even further. A security research firm tells CBS News a "really simple" hack could make the service decidedly less secure. With Amazon Key, launched last month, delivery drivers use an app to unlock the front door, drop a package off, and lock the door behind them all while being monitored via a wireless camera. But Rhino Security Labs says a de-authentication attack on the Wi-Fi router could take that camera offline. What's worse, Wired reports doing so wouldn't suspiciously send the camera to black but just freeze it on the last scene it recorded—such as a harmlessly closed door. This security flaw could be used in two ways. The delivery driver could drop off the package and leave the house but not lock the door, disable the camera using a computer of any kind, then re-enter the home and lock the door. To a user monitoring through the Amazon Key app, this would make everything appear fine while the driver roams about their home. A hacker following a delivery driver could also disable the digital lock and camera just before the driver locks the home. Amazon says the flaw isn't with its Amazon Key software but rather one that is inherent in Wi-Fi routers. It says a de-authentication attack is "unlikely" but it will release a software update to "more quickly provide notification if the camera goes offline during delivery."