You will be given a definition of a task first, then some input of the task.
In this task, you are given a text of many news articles seperated by special token "|||||". Your task is to summarize them.

One of the plaintiffs in the case shows a sandwich measuring less than the advertised 12 inches, as included in the civil complaint. 
  
 SHARE 
  
 By of the 
  
 Size does matter after all, in sandwiches if not class action settlements. 
  
 After lengthy litigation over the measurement of Subway's foot-long and six-inch sandwiches, a federal judge in Milwaukee has signed off on a preliminary resolution of several class action lawsuits over the issue. 
  
 The final approved class may be one of the largest in any kind of lawsuit — everyone who bought a Subway sandwich in the U.S. since 2003. No court records even try to put a number to that besides tens of millions; there are 27,000 Subway shops in the U.S. 
  
 But all most of the class members will get from the deal is the assurance that Subway now pays more attention to the dimensions of its subs. Nine named plaintiffs, as representatives of the class, could get up to $1,000 each. 
  
 Despite the enormity of the class, the final payout for attorney fees and costs, including the class representative payments, will not exceed $525,000, according to court records. 
  
 Thomas Zimmerman of Chicago, one of the lead plaintiff attorneys, noted that won't cover all the time all the parties spent on the case, which included thousands of pages of information from both sides, as well as third parties. 
  
 After one Subway customer's lament that his foot-long was not in fact 12 inches long took off on social media in 2012, several lawsuits followed in various state and federal courts. 
  
 They were all combined into one action that landed before U.S. District Judge Lynn Adelman in Milwaukee, who earlier this month signed an order preliminarily approving the settlement. 
  
 The defendant in the actions, Subway's franchiser Doctor's Associates Inc., issued a news release late Monday about the settlement. It notes that nothing in the settlement found Subway's marketing was unlawful or improper. 
  
 Any class member who objects to the settlement can still write to Adelman by Dec. 16 or attend a final Settlement Fairness Hearing in Milwaukee on Jan. 15. There's a special website established to answer questions for anyone hungry for more information about the deal, www.subsettlement.com. 
  
 When the first lawsuits were filed, some plaintiff customers were seeking up to $5 million, claiming fraud and deceptive trade practices. 
  
 Subway explained that its roll — for its long or short sandwiches — is made from the same weight of dough, but that inherent inconsistencies of kneading, rising, shaping and baking left some a little short. 
  
 It should be noted that the settlement only covers injunctive relief. "No one is releasing a claim for money damages," Zimmer said, meaning Subway customers could still sue to recover damages, individually or as a class. 
  
 That doesn't seem likely. As plaintiffs noted in an earlier pleading, proving that any class member suffered "out of pocket monetary loss because their particular sandwich was less than the promised 12 inches could have proven to be an obstacle." 
  
 Zimmerman said he doesn't pay attention to critics who called the suits frivolous. 
  
 "As a result of this litigation, Subway enacted some significant quality-control measures," he said. 
  
 Bethany Appleby, attorney for Subway, said the company "wants its customers to be happy and enjoy their subs." ||||| Listen up: If you purchased a Subway six-inch or footlong sandwich between Jan. 1, 2003 and Oct. 2, 2015, “your rights could be affected by a lawsuit.” 
  
 That’s the urgent message from www.subsettlement.com, the official website of the biggest sandwich-related controversy not involving a sandwich pitchmen in recent memory. |||||
Output:
Subway is back in the news over a controversial figure that appears in its advertising—and thankfully we're not talking about Jared again. No, this time the culprit is Subway's footlong subs that aren't always a foot long. The Milwaukee Journal Sentinel reports a federal judge agreed to a preliminary settlement this month for a class action lawsuit on behalf of everyone who purchased a sandwich at Subway since 2003. Unfortunately, the tens of millions of us that applies to won't get any money—or even a free sub. Instead, Subway has agreed to take steps to “help ensure that the bread sold to customers is either 6 or 12 inches long," according to the Wall Street Journal. And USA Today reports Subway will no longer train employees to have "a small tolerance in the size of a Footlong sandwich." The lawsuit on behalf of what is possibly the largest number of plaintiffs ever started in 2012, when one brave Subway customer complained on social media that his footlong sub was more like 11 inches, the Journal Sentinel reports. That was followed by a number of lawsuits from around the country that were eventually combined. As part of the settlement, nine customers who participated in the lawsuit could get up to $1,000, but Subway doesn't have to admit to any misleading advertising about the length of its sandwiches. You might think this sounds like a lot of work to get an extra inch of Chicken & Bacon Ranch Melt, but attorney Thomas Zimmerman disagrees. "As a result of this litigation, Subway enacted some significant quality-control measures," he says.