Detailed Instructions: In this task, you are given a text of many news articles seperated by special token "|||||". Your task is to summarize them.
Q: The documents reveal that U.S. Judge Eduardo Robreno ruled Constand and everyone else involved could not be sued for talking to law enforcement about her allegations; however, they can be sued for a Toronto Sun interview and two 2014 tweets regarding the matter. 
  
 In one tweet, Constand wrote, "I won't go away, there is a lot more I will say." In another, she added, "It's not that everybody just forgot about it, truth is nobody cared." 
  
 Constand argued that she didn't specifically name Cosby in the tweets and thus they couldn't form the basis of a breach of contract. 
  
 However, the judge stated, "This argument is unavailing because, of course, a statement can be a reference to an individual or situation even if it does not explicitly say so. Whether the tweets were in fact references to Cosby—and, if so, whether Constand breached the CSA by tweeting them—are questions to be answered at a later stage." ||||| Judge Rules Bill Cosby Can Sue Sex Assault Accuser Andrea Constand for Tweets 
  
 RELATED VIDEO: What Would Stacey Dash Say to Bill Cosby Today? 
  
 U.S. District Judge Eduardo Robreno has ruled that entertainer Bill Cosby cannot sue accuser Andrea Constand for breach of contract for violating their confidentiality agreement by cooperating with law enforcement officials in a case that led to Cosby's arrest last December.However, Cosby can sue her for some of her tweets and an interview she did with the Toronto Sun last summer, according to Robreno's order. He can also sue her attorneys, Dolores Troiani and Bebe Kivitz, for an open letter they wrote to Bruce L. Castor, Jr., who was running for district attorney of Montgomery County, Pennsylvania, last September and who did not prosecute Cosby during his previous stint as district attorney. The letter was published in the Philadelphia Inquirer.In addition, Cosby can explore how his deposition in Constand's 2005 civil suit – which he settled in late 2006 – got into the hands of the media last summer, the judge ruled.Robreno also ruled that Cosby's civil suit against the National Enquirer for allegedly violating a confidentiality agreement can proceed as well. However, Robreno died Cosby's request to delay discovery in that case until his criminal case was resolved.In a statement to PEOPLE, a spokesperson for American Media Inc., the publisher of the Enqurier, said, "While we are disappointed that the court did not dismiss Mr. Cosby's breach of contract claim outright, we are very pleased with court's decision to deny his motion to stay discovery. We very much look forward to deposing him and establishing the meritlessness of his position."Andrew Wyatt, Cosby's spokesman, released a statement to PEOPLE saying they were "very pleased" with the judge's decisions."As we have said before, we are not going to try this case in the press," the statement said. "Thus, while we are, of course, very pleased with the court’s ruling in favor of our client, which means that this case will be decided where it should be – in a court of law and on a full factual record – we will not comment further on the ruling."Troiani and Kivitz declined to comment.Cosby, 79, has been charged with three counts of aggravated indecent assault for allegedly drugging and sexually assaulting Constand, now 43, at his Elkins Park, Pennsylvania mansion in January 2004.He denies the allegations as well as similar ones from more than 50 women.Cosby filed the lawsuit against Constand this past February – two months after newly elected Montgomery County District Attorney Kevin Steele charged him in Constand's case.While Cosby is actively trying to get the charges against him dismissed, so far he has lost all the motions to do so. He is due in court in Norristown, Pennsylvania on Sept. 6 for a pre-trial conference. ||||| On Monday, Bill Cosby’s ongoing court drama, stemming from the nearly 60 women accusing him of sexually assaulting them, grew even more complicated. 
  
 After filing a civil lawsuit against Andrea Constand—whose actions inspired tens of other women to come forward with similar stories—a Pennsylvania federal judge gave Cosby permission to go forward in suing both Constand and The National Enquirer, both of whom Cosby’s legal team claim violated terms of a confidentiality provision in a 2006 settlement agreement. 
  
 According to The Hollywood Reporter, the judge is allowing Cosby to move forward with his claim that two tweets Constand published in 2014 potentially violate her agreement to refrain “from disclosing any aspect of her prior litigation against Cosby.” 
  
 The tweets in question are, “I won't go away, there is a lot more I will say” and “It’s not that everybody just forgot about it, truth is nobody cared.” Although Constand’s legal team points out that Cosby is not explicitly named in the social-media posts, the judge ruled that “a statement can be a reference to an individual or situation even if it does not explicitly say so.” He continued, “Whether the tweets were in fact references to Cosby—and, if so, whether Constand breached the CSA by tweeting them—are questions to be answered at a later stage.” 
  
 The judge dismissed another charge Cosby made against Constand, her mother, and her lawyers, however, alleging that she violated the confidentiality agreement by speaking to law enforcement. Per The Hollywood Reporter, “the judge agrees with [Constand’s lawyers] that such confidentiality is unenforceable because it violates public policy by purporting to prevent individuals from providing information concerning alleged criminal conduct.” 
  
 Cosby, 78, has been charged with three counts of aggravated indecent assault for allegedly drugging and sexually assaulting the former Temple University employee at Cosby’s Elkins Park, Pennsylvania, mansion in 2004. 
  
 For Vanity Fair’s August issue, Mark Seal investigated Constand’s case, with the piece referring to her as “the one accuser who may finally bring Bill Cosby down for good.” ||||| On Monday, Bill Cosby got a mixed ruling in his civil lawsuit against former Temple University employee Andrea Constand and her attorneys. A Pennsylvania federal judge has thrown out one key claim the embattled entertainer has made, but allowed others to move forward. Additionally, Cosby is being allowed to sue the parent company of National Enquirer. 
  
 Constand is the woman whose rape allegations have Cosby facing a pending criminal proceeding in the state. After the District Attorney brought charges this past December against Cosby over a sexual abuse alleged to have happened back in 2004, Cosby returned fire with a civil lawsuit against Costand, her mother, her attorneys Delores Troiani and Bebe Kivitz, as well as American Media for allegedly breaching the confidentiality provision of a 2006 settlement agreement. 
  
 In a ruling today, U.S. District Judge Eduardo Robreno has granted a motion to dismiss as it pertains to Constand, her mother and her lawyers talking to law enforcement. 
  
 Although the settlement agreement prohibited Constand and her reps from disclosing any aspect of her prior litigation against Cosby, the judge agrees with Troiani and Kivitz that such confidentiality is unenforceable because it violates public policy by purporting to prevent individuals from providing information concerning alleged criminal conduct. 
  
 Cosby argued from a reading of prior cases that public policy only prevented disclosures elicited through a subpoena, but Robreno rules that Cosby hasn't cited any support for the proposition that parties can be bound against voluntary disclosures to law enforcement officers. 
  
 As such, Cosby loses that aspect of his breach-of-contract claim, but he experiences better luck on how Constand's lawyers allegedly violated confidentiality by participating in the release of Cosby's decade-old deposition —the now infamous one where he admitted giving women drugs for the purpose of sex. 
  
 Troiani and Kivitz contended that they played no role in the release of the deposition transcript and that the court reporting service that leaked the transcript wasn't their vendor. But the judge says these are factual issues that can't be resolved at this preliminary stage. 
  
 Additionally, the judge declines to reject a claim directed at Constand over two 2014 tweets and an interview with the Toronto Sun. In one tweet, Constand wrote, "I won't go away, there is a lot more I will say," and in the other, she wrote, "It's not that everybody just forgot about it, truth is nobody cared." 
  
 Constand argued that the tweets couldn't form the basis of a breach of contract because she didn't name Cosby. 
  
 "This argument is unavailing because, of course, a statement can be a reference to an individual or situation even if it does not explicitly say so," writes the judge. "Whether the tweets were in fact references to Cosby — and, if so, whether Constand breached the CSA by tweeting them — are questions to be answered at a later stage." 
  
 The woman accusing Cosby of rape also fails at the initial stage in making the argument that Cosby's own unclean hands in talking to the press prevents his claim. As Cosby has an unjust enrichment claim against her, she faces the possibility of having to give Cosby back the monetary proceeds of the settlement. Meanwhile, American Media — which was part of the decade-old Constand lawsuit over what it reported in National Enquirer — must also face Cosby's wrath over articles it more recently published on Constand's allegations and Cosby's deposition. The judge find that what's public is another question of fact that can't yet be resolved. |||||
A:
A federal judge has ruled in Bill Cosby's favor, Vanity Fair reports, saying he can sue a woman accusing him of sexual assault for breach of contract. In the "mixed ruling," US District Judge Eduardo Robreno said the disgraced actor can move forward with a lawsuit against Andrea Constand based on a pair of 2014 tweets and an interview she did with the Toronto Sun, per the Hollywood Reporter. However, People reports, Robreno found that Cosby could not sue Constand based on her having talked to police about an alleged 2004 sexual assault, which led to Cosby's arrest. Cosby has argued that Constand violated a 2006 settlement agreement. With regard to speaking to police, the judge said confidentiality cannot be enforced because it would preclude people from providing information about alleged crimes. As for the tweets—"I won't go away, there is a lot more I will say" and "It's not that everybody just forgot about it, truth is nobody cared"—Constand contends they did not violate confidentiality provisions because they didn't name Cosby. But, writes Robreno, "a statement can be a reference to an individual or situation even if it does not explicitly say so." He adds, "Whether the tweets were in fact references to Cosby—and, if so, whether Constand breached the CSA by tweeting them—are questions to be answered at a later stage." The judge also gave Cosby the green light to sue Constand's attorneys for releasing a decade-old deposition, in which Cosby admits to giving women drugs to facilitate having sex with them, E! reports. The attorneys, however, say they had no part in the release of the information. Finally, Cosby is permitted to sue the National Enquirer for releasing portions of the depositions.