Detailed Instructions: In this task, you are given a text of many news articles seperated by special token "|||||". Your task is to summarize them.
Problem:Araceli Rodriguez holds a photo of her son, Jose Antonio Elena Rodriguez, during a Nov. 2, 2012, protest march along the border fence in Nogales. Family, friends and human-rights groups protested the Border Patrol's use-of-force policies. (Photo: Nick Oza/The Republic) 
  
 Nearly two years after her teenage son was shot to death in Nogales, Mexico, by one or more Border Patrol agents, Araceli Rodriguez is headed to court to find out who killed him. 
  
 Attorneys for Rodriguez, including the American Civil Liberties Union, filed suit in federal district court in Tucson Tuesday, seeking civil damages against the agents involved in what their suit terms the "senseless and unjustified" death of 16-year-old Jose Antonio Elena Rodriguez, on Oct. 10, 2012. 
  
 The suit alleges that in shooting and killing the teenager, agents "used unreasonable and excessive force" in violation of Jose Antonio's Fourth and Fifth Amendment rights and that their actions were not legally justifiable or necessary. The suit doesn't specify an amount sought in damages. 
  
 Customs and Border Protection officials declined comment, saying they cannot talk about pending litigation. 
  
 'I want to see the faces' 
  
 Araceli Rodriguez could not be reached Monday. In an interview with The Arizona Republic earlier this year, she said, "I'm looking for justice. I want to see the faces of my son's killers.... I don't know the names of those people; I don't know anything about them." 
  
 The killing of Jose Antonio was one of several highly publicized cases that helped lead to changes over the past year to how Customs and Border Protection handles the use of deadly force by CBP officers and Border Patrol agents. His death was featured prominently in a December 2013 investigation by The Republic that revealed a lack of transparency and accountability in deadly use of force by Border Patrol agents and CBP officers. That investigation documented 42 cases since 2005, including some not previously reported, in which agents or officers had killed people, including 13 U.S. citizens. Four more people have been killed by Border Patrol agents this year. 
  
 The Republic, through the use of information requests, has found seven cross-border shooting incidents involving allegations of rock throwing. 
  
 MONTINI: Mexican's lawsuit against Border Patrol a good thing 
  
 SPECIAL PROJECT: Force at the border 
  
 CBP and its parent agency, the Department of Homeland Security, earlier this year issued new guidelines more tightly restricting when agents can use deadly force, instituted additional training and promised greater transparency in investigating use-of-force incidents. 
  
 However, the identities of the agent or agents who shot Jose Antonio remain secret. CBP has denied Freedom of Information Act requests from The Republic for those identities and for video from surveillance cameras, mounted on towers 150 feet from where the boy was shot, that may have recorded the incident. 
  
 Rodriguez's lawsuit comes less than a month after a federal appeals court ruled that the family of another Mexican teen, killed in Ciudad Juarez in 2010, has the constitutional right to sue the Border Patrol agent who shot him across the border. 
  
 That ruling, by the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals, was the first nationally to determine that the family of someone shot in Mexico by agents firing from U.S. soil has the right to sue in this country. 
  
 "That is an important precedent for our case," said Luis Parra, one of the attorneys representing Araceli Rodriguez. 
  
 14 shots 
  
 As The Republic reported, on the October evening Jose Antonio was killed, Border Patrol agents in Nogales, Ariz., were chasing two men who were climbing over the fence into Mexico. Agents were responding to a 911 call about men carrying bundles over the fence into Nogales, Ariz., when two men dashed out from behind a house on the U.S. side and clambered onto the border fence. As agents and Nogales police officers tried to arrest the men, rocks were thrown over the fence from the Mexican side, they reported. 
  
 Border deaths: Use-of-force policy tightened for Border Patrol 
  
 Autopsy report: Teen was hit from behind 
  
 One or more Border Patrol agents fired repeatedly through the fence, hitting Jose Antonio in the back and head at least 10 times. But, according to Isidro Alvarado, a security guard, Jose Antonio was not throwing rocks. Alvarado said the boy was walking down the sidewalk on Calle Internacional, about 20 feet ahead of him, when two youths ran past them away from the fence. Alvardo said he then heard gunshots and saw Jose Antonio fall dead. 
  
 Neither Alvarado nor the Nogales police officers on the U.S. side reported hearing any warnings or commands before at least 14 shots were fired by the Border Patrol. Customs and Border Protection's use-of-force guidelines require agents to issue a verbal warning, when possible, before using deadly force. 
  
 "Just prior to the shooting, Jose Antonio was visible and not hiding ... he did not pose a threat. He was doing nothing but peacefully walking down the street by himself when he was gunned down. He was not committing a crime, nor was he throwing rocks, using a weapon, or in any way threatening U.S. Border Patrol agents or anyone else," the complaint alleges. 
  
 Earlier this year, CBP released a study of its use-of-force practices by the Police Executive Research Forum, a non-profit law-enforcement research organization. The forum reviewed all deadly use-of-force cases from January 2010 through October 2012. The report, describing how agents respond to rock throwing, said, "Too many cases do not appear to meet the test of objective reasonableness with regard to the use of deadly force...." 
  
 The report added, "The more questionable cases generally involved shootings that took place through the IBF (international border fence) at subjects who were throwing rocks at the agents from Mexico." 
  
 Read or Share this story: http://usat.ly/1mZZKJt ||||| The mother of a Mexican teenager killed in Mexico when at least one U.S. Border Patrol agent opened fire north of the border has filed suit, alleging that the agent violated the law, her attorneys and the American Civil Liberties Union said Tuesday. 
  
 Araceli Rodriguez seeks unspecified monetary and punitive damages for what she contends was the wrongful death of her younger son, who was shot at least eight times in October 2012. Jose Antonio Elena Rodriguez, 16, was walking along a street in his hometown of Nogales, which runs parallel to the border fence. 
  
 Rodriguez said she had gotten no answers from the U.S. government. 
  
 “I want to know who these people were who assassinated my child. Why were there so many bullets in my son’s body?” Rodriguez said in an interview from Nogales. “Put yourself in my shoes. Imagine if your child were shot 10 times — a child thrown on the floor in a pool of his own blood. And there are no answers. There is no justice.” 
  
 U.S. Customs and Border Protection officials have declined to comment, saying the agency does not discuss pending litigation. 
  
 Jose died on Oct. 10, 2012, when at least one Border Patrol agent fired through the border fence into Nogales. An autopsy showed he was hit eight times in the back. 
  
 The Border Patrol said the agent, whom it has refused to identify, had been hit by rocks when he responded to reports of drug smugglers climbing the fence. 
  
 Rodriguez’s lawsuit says Jose was not throwing rocks and that he had just finished a basketball game with friends and was shot as he walked along Calle Internacional, a major boulevard. 
  
 U.S. officials launched an investigation but have yet to release the results, including whether the shooting was within agency policy. It’s unclear whether the agent or agents were cleared, disciplined or fired. Nor have the results of a Mexican investigation been released. 
  
 Immigration rising in Texas See more videos 
  
 The Border Patrol has been criticized for a “lack of diligence” in investigating agents who fire their weapons, a report by independent law enforcement experts found. The review, commissioned by Customs and Border Protection, found that agents are rarely prosecuted, with investigations typically concluding that the agent acted in self-defense. The agency unsuccessfully sought to keep the report secret. 
  
 The Rodriguez lawsuit, filed in federal court in Tucson, raises questions about whether U.S. laws protect foreign individuals on foreign soil. 
  
 Lee Gelernt, deputy director of the ACLU Immigrants’ Rights Project, said the U.S. can’t have it both ways. 
  
 “They want to be able to shoot into Mexican territory and patrol and control Mexican territory with force, but Mexicans then don’t have the legal right to bring the U.S. to court,” Gelernt said. 
  
 But an independent legal expert said he doubted that U.S. constitutional protections would apply to Jose. 
  
 “I would say they have an uphill battle,” said Aaron Xavier Fellmeth, a professor of law at Arizona State University’s Sandra Day O'Connor College of Law. 
  
 Non-U.S. citizens in the United States have most constitutional rights, except those relating to the rights and duties of citizenship, such as the right to vote, he said. Non-U.S. citizens outside the country have a weaker basis for claiming constitutional rights. 
  
 “In the distant past, the U.S. Supreme Court decisively denied constitutional protections to aliens outside the United States. In fact, it denied constitutional protections to U.S. citizens outside the United States as well, so aliens didn't have much of a chance,” Fellmeth said. 
  
 But case law indicates that foreigners are afforded U.S. constitutional protections in some instances, Gelernt contends. 
  
 For instance, in 2008 the U.S. Supreme Court ruled 5 to 4 that a foreigner held at the Guantanamo Bay naval base in Cuba had the right to challenge his detention in federal court under the U.S. Constitution. The U.S. leases the land and controls the base. 
  
 Gelernt argues that the Border Patrol holds similar control over Mexican territory along the U.S.-Mexico border. 
  
 The U.S. has taken no action on the mother’s claim, Gelernt said, and the statute of limitations for filing a civil suit was fast approaching. 
  
 “Unfortunately, this is the last resort for the family,” he said. 
  
 On Tuesday, flanked by family, attorneys and ACLU officials, Taide Elena displayed pictures of her grandson at a news conference in Tucson. 
  
 “One of these photographs signifies for me a happy time,” she said, holding a framed photo of a 10-year-old Jose smiling alongside his older brother, Diego. 
  
 Then she held up a photo of Jose in a casket, escorted by pallbearers. 
  
 “This other one is the pain Border Patrol has left me,” she said. “Jose Antonio was not an animal. He was a child. He was a human being.” 
  
 cindy.carcamo@latimes.com 
  
 Twitter: @thecindycarcamo |||||
Solution:
The mother of a Mexican teen shot at least eight times in the back by US Border Patrol agents firing over the border is going to court to find out who killed her son. Jose Antonio Elena Rodriguez, 16, was shot by at least one agent in October 2012 as they fired on what they said was a group of rock-throwers. Witnesses say Jose wasn't among the rock-throwers but was shot dead as he walked home from a basketball game. His mother's lawsuit accuses agents of using "unreasonable and excessive force" and seeks unspecified damages, the Arizona Republic reports. Customs and Border Protection officials have refused to release surveillance footage or identify the agent or agents involved. "I want to know who these people were who assassinated my child. Why were there so many bullets in my son's body?" the teen's mother tells the Los Angeles Times. "Put yourself in my shoes. Imagine if your child were shot 10 times—a child thrown on the floor in a pool of his own blood. And there are no answers. There is no justice." Her lawsuit, which is supported by the American Civil Liberties Union, comes a month after a federal appeals court decided the family of another Mexican teenager killed from across the border had the right to sue the agent involved, USA Today notes.