Instructions: In this task, you are given a text of many news articles seperated by special token "|||||". Your task is to summarize them.
Input: These crawls are part of an effort to archive pages as they are created and archive the pages that they refer to. That way, as the pages that are referenced are changed or taken from the web, a link to the version that was live when the page was written will be preserved.Then the Internet Archive hopes that references to these archived pages will be put in place of a link that would be otherwise be broken, or a companion link to allow people to see what was originally intended by a page's authors.The goal is to fix all broken links on the web . Crawls of supported "No More 404" sites. ||||| 0 Old law prevents Washington state from preparing for nuclear disaster 
  
 As residents of Hawaii were faced with the possibility of an incoming missile on Saturday, which later proved to be a false alarm, KIRO 7 looked into the plans to protect Washington residents. 
  
 We found a law from 80s is blocking the state's effort to prepare for the worst. 
  
 Related Headlines Thieves back truck through Everett business to steal ATM 
  
 That law actually prevents Washington State Emergency Management from planning for a nuclear strike. 
  
 Lawmakers passed it as a symbolic end to the cold war with the Soviet Union. 
  
 In the 1950s and 60s during the Cold War, Washington state had a clear plan and places to shelter -- even bunkers built inside Seattle bridges -- in case of nuclear disaster. 
  
 Scroll down to continue reading 
  
 Trending headlines 
  
 DOWNLOAD OUR FREE NEWS APP 
  
 But currently, with North Korea's escalating threats with nukes, few people know state law prevents planning for nuclear disaster. 
  
 A little known 1984 state law which says "Comprehensive Emergency Management" does not mean preparation for emergency evacuation or relocation of residents in anticipation of nuclear attack. 
  
 State Senator Mark Miloscia has been trying to repeal that old law, which he says enacted in our state during the Reagan era. 
  
 “I couldn’t believe how this thing could go on the books,” said Miloscia. “If we ever have to evacuate or relocate citizens due to a nuclear attack or an impending nuclear attack, right now, we can’t plan for that. It puts like a big stop order on any sort of planning we have to do to prepare for the unthinkable.” 
  
 Hawaii has a nuclear disaster plan which may include re-opening cold-war era tunnels and shelters. 
  
 The message for lawmakers in our state is clear. 
  
 “I think there is right now, a common sense support for repealing this. We’ve just got to educate people that let’s do that soon,” said Miloscia. 
  
 Miloscia knows something about nuclear preparedness. He was a B-52 bomber pilot during the Cold War. 
  
 He says lawmakers from both parties want to change the law. 
  
  
  
 © 2019 Cox Media Group. ||||| This undated picture released by North Korea's Korean Central News Agency via KNS on March 7, 2017 shows the launch of four ballistic missiles by the Korean People's Army (KPA) during a military drill. (STR/AFP/Getty Images) (Photo: STR, This content is subject to copyright.) 
  
 Despite growing concerns about a nuclear strike on the U.S. by North Korea, emergency management officials in Washington state say they are prevented from forming an evacuation plan in the event of a nuclear attack. An effort is underway to change that. 
  
 Multiple reports on Tuesday indicated U.S. intelligence believed North Korea had reached the capability of miniaturizing a nuclear warhead to make it small enough to load onto a missile. That development comes years earlier than previously thought. 
  
 President Donald Trump responded with a warning. 
  
 “North Korea had best not make any more threats to the United States,” Trump said Tuesday. “They will be met with fire and fury like the world has never seen.” 
  
 The President followed that up Wednesday with tweets touting the capability of America's nuclear arsenal, adding that he hopes it never has to be used. 
  
  
  
 "My first order as President was to renovate and modernize our nuclear arsenal. It is now far stronger and more powerful than ever before," he said. "Hopefully we will never have to use this power, but there will never be a time that we are not the most powerful nation in the world!" 
  
  
  
 My first order as President was to renovate and modernize our nuclear arsenal. It is now far stronger and more powerful than ever before.... — Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) August 9, 2017 
  
 ...Hopefully we will never have to use this power, but there will never be a time that we are not the most powerful nation in the world! — Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) August 9, 2017 
  
  
  
 But if there is an imminent threat of attack on Washington state, there is no plan on how to evacuate. State law prevents it. 
  
 RCW 38.52.030, passed in 1983, says "The comprehensive, all-hazard emergency plan authorized under this subsection may not include preparation for emergency evacuation or relocation of residents in anticipation of nuclear attack.” 
  
 Retired General Barry McCaffrey, who has been outspoken about the need to pay serious attention to North Korea, calls the law "goofy." 
  
 "Certainly it’s a goofy thing to not tell people to think about a major real threat," he said in April. "What we're trying to achieve is deterrence, which means ballistic missile defense." 
  
 FEMA has released a comprehensive guide to the nuclear threat, and the state's Emergency Management Plan covers all sorts of disasters. 
  
 A bipartisan bill to remove that section of the law was introduced in the state senate this year, but it never made it out of committee before the third special session ended. 
  
 "Because of paranoia and scare that preparing for war would lead to war, legislators back in the early 80s set up this silly system where we’re prohibited from planning for relocation or evacuation in the event of a nuclear war," said Sen. Mark Miloscia (R-Federal Way), who co-sponsored the bill. 
  
 "Since the state government committee was already planning to update our emergency planning for a large earthquake in the Puget Sound, it makes sense to update this statue at the same time. So, we can improve our planning for both earthquakes and for nuclear strikes," said Sen. David Frockt (D-Seattle), who sponsored the bill with Miloscia. 
  
 The author of the state law preventing a nuclear attack plan, former Democratic state lawmaker Dick Nelson, says at the time, Washington state was inundated with nuclear threats, and the idea was to create an example of peace. 
  
 "It was about finding a middle ground we could all agree on," he said in April. 
  
 Nelson also felt that if Seattle were to be attacked, the chances of survival would be so low that a preparation plan would have been moot anyway. 
  
 But Nelson says the law does provide an "out" so cities can create their own plan. He says the law doesn't necessarily prevent a plan from being put into place, but rather offers the option of not creating a plan. Regardless, the state says it has no evacuation plan. 
  
 Nelson still says he has no regrets. 
  
 "I haven't abandoned my basic belief that we need to find peaceful ways of dealing with the nuclear threat," he said. "But I also believe we have a crazy dictator who could do anything." 
  
 © 2017 KING-TV |||||
Output:
"Our area will be in the forefront of any nuclear exchange, whether it involves North Korea, China, or Russia," a Seattle-area anti-nuclear activist tells the Los Angeles Times. About 20 miles west of Seattle is Naval Base Kitsap-Bangor, home to the largest concentration of deployed nuclear weapons in the US in the form of eight ballistic-missile submarines. Couple that with North Korean nuclear advancements and threats, and Seattleites are on edge, with reports of "nuclear nightmares" and real estate ads touting homes with bomb shelters. And that's without most residents knowing that Washington state has no plan for dealing with a nuclear attack—because it's illegal to make one. A 1984 law prohibits Washington state's emergency plans from including "preparation for emergency evacuation or relocation of residents in anticipation of nuclear attack." It wasn't always that way. KIRO reports the state had a nuclear-attack plan—including bunkers inside Seattle bridges—in place in the 1950s and 1960s. Then the 1984 law was passed to promote peace in the wake of the Cold War. Now, state Sen. Mark Miloscia tells KING the law is "silly" and irresponsible. He says it “puts like a big stop order on any sort of planning we have to do to prepare for the unthinkable.” Miloscia has introduced a bill to repeal the old law, but—unfortunately for nuke-nervous Seattleites—it won't be considered until January.