Detailed Instructions: In this task, you are given a text of many news articles seperated by special token "|||||". Your task is to summarize them.
Q: Playboy.com Sued Can't You See?!? Your Site's Not Blind Friendly!!! 
  
 Playboy.com Sued by Man Alleging Website Not Accessible to the Blind 
  
 EXCLUSIVE 
  
 The blind are leading the blind ... right into a class action lawsuit against Playboy.com﻿ for operating a website that can't be enjoyed by the visually impaired. 
  
 Donald Nixon just filed the suit, claiming Playboy.com is violating the Americans with Disabilities Act, because its websites -- Playboy.com and Playboyshop.com -- are not compatible with his screen-reading software. 
  
 In docs, obtained by TMZ, Nixon says he's legally blind and visually impaired people like him, "cannot fully and equally use or enjoy the facilities, products, and services." He doesn't spell it out, but we're sure Donald's just there for the articles. 
  
 He's suing to force the media outlet to make its websites accessible for the blind ... as well as unspecified damages. We've reached out to Playboy.com ... so far, no word back. 
  
 BTW ... we've seen this before. Kylie's website was hit with a very similar suit. ||||| Poorly designed websites can be more than frustrating, they can break the law, a legally blind New York man claims in lawsuits against Muhlenberg College, East Stroudsburg University and about 40 other schools in the mid-Atlantic. 
  
 Lawsuits filed in federal court in Manhattan last week on behalf of Jason Camacho claim the institutions’ websites do not comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act because they’re not properly designed for the visually impaired to use. 
  
 The suits allege that the sites don’t work with screen reading software, which converts text to computerized speech, allowing visually impaired people to access the internet. For that reason, the suits claim, Camacho was unable to obtain information about the schools, which he was interested in attending. 
  
 The suits are part of a wave of litigation over website accessibility under the ADA, a 1990 law that requires businesses and institutions to make their services accessible to people with physical disabilities. The U.S. Department of Justice, however, has yet to release long-anticipated guidelines on designing websites to be ADA compliant, leaving organizations and businesses uncertain about what’s required and vulnerable to lawsuits. 
  
 An advocate for the visually impaired said access to websites for the blind is a real problem. In addition to the text and images sighted people see, screen reading software depends on tags in a website’s code to describe images or prompt users how to fill out a form. 
  
 When those things are missing, blind users lack basic but crucial information about how to interact with a website, making tasks such as completing a purchase or registering for a class impossible, said Chris Danielsen, spokesman for the National Federation of the Blind. 
  
 “Most websites have at least a few issues,” Danielsen said. “It’s getting better all the time, but it’s not unusual for blind people to encounter accessibility issues just surfing the web on a daily basis.” 
  
 Spokeswomen for Muhlenberg College and East Stroudsburg University said they could not comment on pending lawsuits. 
  
 Courts, including the Third U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Pennsylvania, have held that when a website is used in conjunction with a physical facility such as a college, restaurant or store, it must accommodate the disabled, said Shari Lewis, a New York attorney who represents and advises businesses on ADA compliance issues. 
  
 But other courts, including the Second U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in New York, have interpreted the law more broadly, finding that people need not ever physically visit a school or business for the ADA to apply to its website. The lawsuits assert that Camacho has the right to sue Muhlenberg and East Stroudsburg in New York where the broader interpretation applies, because their representatives were present at a college fair Camacho attended in Manhattan. 
  
 Camacho’s lawyer, Jeffrey M. Gottlieb of New York, was unavailable to discuss the cases this week. Gottlieb has filed about 95 lawsuits alleging ADA violations against companies and universities on Camacho’s behalf. 
  
 A study by the law firm Seyfarth Shaw, which specializes in defending against such suits, shows the number of cases is growing. About 800 ADA lawsuits were filed in 2017, while more than 1,000 were filed in the first half of 2018. Most were filed in federal court in New York; 24 were filed in Pennsylvania. 
  
 Lewis said the lawsuits have been effective in getting companies to make their websites easier for blind people to use. But, she said, it's difficult for businesses to be sure that they’re not violating the law because the ADA doesn’t specifically address website accessibility. 
  
 “The ADA was passed long before there was an internet, and the world is a very different place,” Lewis said. 
  
 The complaints against Muhlenberg and East Stroudsburg say most businesses and government entities have embraced guidelines issued by the international standards group World Wide Web Consortium. However, Lewis noted, there are competing standards that differ from the consortium’s guidelines. 
  
 While the federal government has adopted the consortium’s standards for its own websites, it has repeatedly put off issuing guidance for private sector organizations on what is required to comply and putting the decision on the courts, Lewis said. 
  
 “It’s going to be problematic until we have guidance from the federal government,” she said. 
  
 Danielsen, of the National Federation of the Blind, said that while the organization does use legal action to get compliance — it settled a class-action lawsuit against Target over its website for $6 million in 2008 — it doesn’t recommend litigation as a first step. 
  
 “We always try to engage with companies or institutions before we file a lawsuit,” he said, adding that it advises members to allow organizations that don’t comply with the ADA an opportunity to correct the problem. 
  
 When citizens do sue under the ADA, organizations find that the cheapest option is to settle, Lewis said. Such outcomes can be profitable for the lawyers who file the suits, because the ADA allows them to collect attorney fees. Lewis said in her experience, such suits are typically settled for $10,000 to $30,000 plus attorney fees. 
  
 “The law firm is entitled to legal fees and the more you fight them the more fees they get,” she said. 
  
 peter.hall@mcall.com 
  
 Twitter @phall215 
  
 610-820-6581 ||||| Kylie Jenner Inc. Sued You're Losing the Blind! Makeup Site's Blocking Us 
  
 Kylie Jenner's Makeup Site's Not Blind-Friendly According to Lawsuit 
  
 EXCLUSIVE 
  
 Kylie Jenner needs to get on the horn to her IT guys to update her website ASAP because, as it stands, her blind customers are getting screwed ... according to a new lawsuit. 
  
 Antoinette Suchenko says she's been legally blind for more than 20 years, and uses screen reader software to navigate the Internet -- but in the suit she says Kylie's cosmetics site isn't compatible. As a result, she's having a hard time bagging any of Kylie's uber-popular makeup products. 
  
 She's not looking for any cash -- Antoinette says she just wants Kylie's site to get up to standards required by the Americans with Disabilities Act. She says doing so will be a major W for Kylie's bottom line ... sales. She's suing Kylie Inc., not KJ herself. 
  
 As we reported, a similar suit was filed last year, by someone else, against the DASH Store's website. ||||| Kardashian's Dash Store Sued I See You Don't Like Blind Customers ... 
  
 Kardashian's Dash Store Sued 
  
 EXCLUSIVE 
  
 The Kardashian's Dash store refuses to do business with the blind ... treating them as second-class citizens ... so claims a blind man who's suing the joint. 
  
 Andres Gomez says he's legally blind and uses screen reader software to access the Internet. But the software continually came up empty when he tried browsing Dash store's website. He says the site contains barriers and Dash is well aware but refuses to fix it. 
  
 Kim, Khloe and Kourtney are not named defendants in the suit. 
  
 Gomez accuses the store of violating the American with Disabilities Act because Dash's website fails to sync with his screen reader software and provides no other access for blind customers. 
  
 Gomez is suing to get Dash's website to comply with federal law and he also wants cash. 
  
 We've reached out to Dash, so far no word back. |||||
A:
A new lawsuit claims there's a big problem with Playboy's website: it's not accessible to the blind. The suit, though, isn't about racy photos. Donald Nixon, who is legally blind, filed the class-action suit on Wednesday, arguing Playboy.com and Playboyshop.com aren't compatible with screen-reading software that translates text into braille or recites it using a speech synthesizer, reports TMZ. Nixon's suit claims the visually impaired "cannot fully and equally use or enjoy the facilities, products, and services" offered, putting Playboy in violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act, which requires businesses to make services accessible to people with physical disabilities. Nixon hopes to force Playboy to become accessible to the blind but is also seeking unspecified damages. The Kardashians' DASH website was hit with a similar complaint in 2016. A year later, a blind woman sued Kylie Jenner's Kylie Cosmetics, arguing its website wasn't compatible with her screen-reader software. A legally blind man sued some 40 mid-Atlantic schools in federal court in Manhattan last week for the same reason, per the Allentown Morning Call. The paper notes the Justice Department has yet to release guidelines on how to make websites compliant with the ADA, and the delay has left businesses in the lurch. (A novel treatment for blindness doesn't come cheap.)