Detailed Instructions: In this task, you are given a text of many news articles seperated by special token "|||||". Your task is to summarize them.
Q: They see what you did here, Starbucks. 
  
 Two Starbucks regulars in California claim Americans are getting screwed over by their favorite caffeine provider. In a class-action lawsuit filed Wednesday, Siera Strumlauf and Benjamin Robles accuse Starbucks of purposefully underfilling lattes by at least 25 percent — an intentional act of fraud, their suit claims, meant to cut costs by putting less milk into the supposed Tall (12-ounce), Grande (16-ounce), and Venti (20-ounce) sizes. Through this alleged ruse, Starbucks “has saved countless millions of dollars in the cost of goods sold and was unjustly enriched by taking payment for more product than it delivers,” argues the pair, who say they used to visit Starbucks several times a week. 
  
 The duo alleges that this isn’t just a couple of baristas being chintzy — they say it’s a company-wide conspiracy. As proof, they point to a system Starbucks instituted in all its stores for preparing lattes in 2009. At the time, baristas got new milk pitchers with “fill lines” etched in so that drinks would get the same amount of milk. Unfortunately, these two say, that’s the smoking gun they needed. According to Law360: 
  
 For instance, in making a “grande” 16-ounce latte, baristas are required to use 12 ounces of milk, plus two 1-ounce shots of espresso. Therefore, the maximum possible fluid ounce amount of latte a customer could possibly receive is 14 ounces, the pair alleged. 
  
  
  
 Perhaps most significantly, the pair contend that the cups Starbucks uses for its 12-, 16- and 20-ounce lattes can hold exactly those amounts if they are filled completely to the top brim. But as a rule, Starbucks employees are instructed to leave a quarter-inch of space from the top of the cup. From a logical standpoint, that means that no cup Starbucks uses could possibly contain the alleged serving size, and every drink is filled less than the amount advertised, the consumers said. 
  
 Neither can the foam count toward a drink’s volume because, the lawsuit says, “the food science community measures foam by mass, not volume,” though right now they argue Starbucks does. Obviously this reasoning could hit some snags when other drinks are factored in — a Grande cappuccino will by definition have less volume than a Grande latte, and in an attempt to bite into the third-wave trend, the coffee giant’s espresso drink menu lately has exploded with all manner of milk-to-foam variations. 
  
 A Starbucks rep responded that the suit has no merit because their “handcrafted beverages” are inherently going to vary in size, and that they “inform customers of the likelihood of variations.” A vague-sounding dismissal for now, but the coffee giant certainly isn’t planning to roll over and rename the Venti size whatever the Italian word is for “18.” 
  
 [Law360] ||||| Starbucks In a Latte Trouble ... You're Shorting Our Coffee!! 
  
 EXCLUSIVE 
  
 Two Cali java fanatics have a bean to grind with Starbucks for refusing to fill their cups to the rim ... according to a new suit. 
  
 The duo says every time they order a tall, grande or venti sized latte ... it's grossly underfilled. They point out the menu promises 12, 16 and 20 ounces -- but based on their research Starbucks underfills those cups by about 25% EVERY time. 
  
 In the class action suit, they admit occasionally the milk foam on top gets to the rim, but they add ... "In the food science community, as well as in the weights and measures community, foam is not measured on a volumetric basis." 
  
 Translation: Foam doesn't count! 
  
 Nor do they think this is an accident ... they paint CEO Howard Schultz as the villain for cutting costs by reducing the amount of milk in each latte. 
  
 They're seeking damages for Starbucks latte drinkers all across the country. |||||
A:
Two former Starbucks fanatics are suing the coffee giant for chronically under-filling its lattes in an attempt to save money on milk, Grub Street reports. The class-action lawsuit filed Wednesday by Siera Strumlauf and Benjamin Robles—who used to go to Starbucks multiple times every week—claims the company has "saved countless millions of dollars" through an act of intentional fraud against its customers. According to TMZ, the suit alleges all three sizes of Starbucks lattes are regularly under-filled by at least 25%. And while the foam will occasionally reach the top of the cup, the lawsuit cites food science when it claims foam doesn't count toward a drink's volume. The lawsuit blames new pitchers with "fill lines" issued to Starbucks locations in 2009 for the problem. They say those fill lines cap milk at an amount that couldn't possibly fill the company's cups. Starbucks counters that its "handcrafted beverages" are going to vary by location and employee, and its customers are aware of that. Robles and Strumlauf are seeking damages for Starbucks latte drinkers everywhere. (A Starbucks employee made better headlines with her gesture on behalf of a deaf customer.)