Definition: In this task, you are given a text of many news articles seperated by special token "|||||". Your task is to summarize them.
Input: FILE - In an Oct. 8, 2014 file photo, attorney Steven Wise of the Nonhuman Rights Project argues on behalf of Tommy, a chimpanzee, before the New York Supreme Court Appellate Division, in Albany, N.Y.... (Associated Press) 
  
 FILE - In an Oct. 8, 2014 file photo, attorney Steven Wise of the Nonhuman Rights Project argues on behalf of Tommy, a chimpanzee, before the New York Supreme Court Appellate Division, in Albany, N.Y.... (Associated Press) 
  
 NEW YORK (AP) — Two chimpanzees that were caged at a trailer lot and at a primate sanctuary don't have the legal rights of people in New York, an appeals court said Thursday. 
  
 Nonhuman Rights Project attorney Steven Wise had argued to the appeals court in March that adult male chimps Tommy and Kiko should be granted a writ of habeas corpus, which for people relates to whether someone is being unlawfully detained or imprisoned and should be taken to see a judge. 
  
 Wise argued that the chimps, which were caged in a trailer lot in Gloversville, outside Albany, and at a primate sanctuary in Niagara Falls, should be moved to a large outdoor sanctuary in Florida. 
  
 Chimpanzees, which can walk upright and use sticks and stones as tools to help gather food, are considered to be the closest living relatives of humans. Some have been taught to speak simple human sign language. 
  
 But the state Supreme Court's appellate division, in a ruling that affirmed a lower court's decision, said there was no legal precedent for chimpanzees being considered people and their cognitive capabilities didn't mean they could be held legally accountable for their actions. 
  
 "Petitioner does not suggest that any chimpanzee charged with a crime in New York could be deemed fit to proceed," the court said. 
  
 The court also said that even if chimps were able to get writs of habeas corpus the writs wouldn't be applicable with these animals "since petitioner does not challenge the legality of the chimpanzees' detention, but merely seeks their transfer to a different facility." 
  
 The ruling said that while Wise's "avowed mission is certainly laudable," determining the legal rights of animals was better suited to legislators. 
  
 The animal advocacy group said it would take its case to the state's highest court, the Court of Appeals. 
  
 "For 2000 years, all nonhuman animals have been legal things who lack the capacity for any legal rights," Wise said. "This is not going to change without a struggle." 
  
 The Nonhuman Rights Project, based in Coral Springs, Florida, started its litigation over the rights of chimps in 2013, when lawsuits were filed on behalf of Kiko in state Supreme Court in Niagara Falls and of Tommy in Fulton County. Those cases were unsuccessful. ||||| NEW YORK (Reuters) - Chimpanzees do not deserve the same rights as people, a New York state appeals court unanimously concluded on Thursday, as it refused to order the release of two of the animals to a primate sanctuary. 
  
 A chimpanzee named Samantha waits for her daily feeding at the Liberia Chimpanzee Rescue Project headquarters in Charlesville, Liberia, November 19, 2015. REUTERS/Malin Palm 
  
 The 5-0 decision by the Appellate Division in Manhattan is the latest defeat for the Nonhuman Rights Project and its lawyer Steven Wise in a long debate over whether caged chimpanzees are actually legal “persons” entitled like humans to bodily liberty. 
  
 Citing experts like British primatologist Jane Goodall, the Nonhuman Rights Project said chimpanzees and humans share many behavioral, cognitive and social capabilities. 
  
 It said this entitled chimpanzees to many of the same rights, and sought “habeas corpus” relief to win freedom for Tommy and Kiko, each held by a private owner in upstate New York. 
  
 But the shared capabilities “do not translate to a chimpanzee’s capacity or ability, like humans, to bear legal duties, or to be held legally accountable for their actions,” Justice Troy Webber wrote for the appeals court. 
  
 “While petitioner’s avowed mission is certainly laudable, the according of any fundamental legal rights to animals, including entitlement to habeas relief, is an issue better suited to the legislative process,” Webber wrote. 
  
 The Nonhuman Rights Project is reviewing the decision, which upheld rulings by state Supreme Court Justice Barbara Jaffe in Manhattan. 
  
 “This is not going to change without a struggle,” Wise said in a statement. “We remain confident that Tommy’s and Kiko’s fundamental right to bodily liberty will be recognized.” 
  
 Wise previously failed to win the release of the chimpanzees Hercules and Leo from the State University of New York at Stony Brook. They later moved to Louisiana after the school stopped using them for research. 
  
 Tommy’s and Kiko’s cause drew support from Harvard Law School Professor Laurence Tribe in a friend-of-the-court brief. 
  
 Tribe suggested that nonhuman animals could face legal duties, citing a “long history, mainly from the medieval and early modern periods, of animals being tried for offenses such as attacking human beings and eating crops.” 
  
 Webber, however, said none of the cited cases were recent or from New York, and chimpanzees’ inability to defend themselves or take sufficient responsibility explains why those that kill or seriously injure humans are not prosecuted. 
  
 Tribe, in an email, said, “The court’s quotation from my amicus brief speaks for itself, as does the court’s decision to discount it on the somewhat curious ground that none of the cases I cited came from the modern New York scene.” 
  
 The cases are In re: Nonhuman Rights Project Inc on behalf of Tommy, and In re: Nonhuman Rights Project Inc on behalf of Kiko, New York State Supreme Court, Appellate Division, 1st Department, Nos. 3648, 3649. ||||| These crawls are part of an effort to archive pages as they are created and archive the pages that they refer to. That way, as the pages that are referenced are changed or taken from the web, a link to the version that was live when the page was written will be preserved.Then the Internet Archive hopes that references to these archived pages will be put in place of a link that would be otherwise be broken, or a companion link to allow people to see what was originally intended by a page's authors.The goal is to fix all broken links on the web . Crawls of supported "No More 404" sites. |||||
Output:
Chimpanzees are, legally speaking, still not people following a unanimous ruling by a New York state appeals court Thursday, the New York Daily News reports. The Nonhuman Rights Project is attempting to secure a writ of habeas corpus for Tommy, who lawyer Steven Wise says lives in a cement cage in a warehouse, and Kiko, who lives in a storefront. According to the AP, Wise bases his argument on chimps' position as humans' closest relatives, their ability to use simple tools, their capacity to learn simple sign language, and more. But the court ruled that, similarities to people or not, chimps lack the "capacity or ability ... to bear legal duties, or to be held legally accountable for their actions," Reuters reports. The ruling upheld another from January. The Nonhuman Rights Project is seeking to have chimps classified as legal "persons," with all the rights that implies. "For 2,000 years, all nonhuman animals have been legal things who lack the capacity for any legal rights," Wise says. He earlier tried and failed to get two chimps held by a New York university released. In addition to concluding Tommy and Kiko lack the wherewithal to face justice in a habeas corpus case, the court also concluded that Wise isn't actually seeking their freedom but rather to transfer them from one form of detention—private ownership—to another—a primate sanctuary. The court concluded that while Wise's cause is "laudable," it's more of a legislative issue. The Nonhuman Rights Project plans to appeal to the state supreme court.