Q: In this task, you are given a text of many news articles seperated by special token "|||||". Your task is to summarize them.
Republican National Committee Chairman Reince Priebus before speaking at the Harris School of Public Policy Studies at the University of Chicago on Nov. 16, 2011. 
  
 Republican National Committee Chairman Reince Priebus before speaking at the Harris School of Public Policy Studies at the University of Chicago on Nov. 16, 2011. Close 
  
 The leaders of the two political parties clashed over the role of gender in U.S. elections, with the Democrat saying her opponents have been “shockingly out of touch” on women’s issues and the Republican saying Democrats and the media have created a phony conflict. 
  
 “If the Democrats said we had a war on caterpillars and every mainstream media outlet talked about the fact that Republicans have a war on caterpillars, then we’d have problems with caterpillars,” Republican National Committee Chairman Reince Priebus said in an interview on Bloomberg Television’s “Political Capital with Al Hunt” airing this weekend. “It’s a fiction.” 
  
 Democratic National Committee Chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz and fellow party leaders have been hammering Republicans for supporting policies such as requiring women seeking abortions to get an ultrasound. 
  
 “The jury of women across America have ruled that the Republicans have been unbelievably extreme and out of touch and hyper-focused on cultural issues,” Wasserman Schultz said on “Political Capital.” That’s reflected in polling showing President Barack Obama beating former Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney or other Republican presidential contenders by 18 points, she said. That gender gap showed up in a survey of swing states published April 2 by USA Today/Gallup. 
  
 Making the Case 
  
 While Priebus rejected the idea that Republicans are waging a war on women, he said they can combat the perception by focusing on their plans for the economy. He said they will be making their case “to women and everyone in this country.” 
  
 “This president hasn’t fulfilled his promises,” Priebus said. “We can do better in this country in regards to jobs and the economy.” 
  
 The two leaders, in separate interviews, also disagreed over the likely outcome in the Supreme Court challenge to Obama’s health-care law, with Wasserman-Schultz saying she is confident it will be upheld. The court heard three days of arguments last week over the constitutionality of the law, which requires Americans to buy health insurance. 
  
 Priebus said he expects the court to strike down the law, which he said would be “good for our country.” He criticized Obama’s recent suggestion that such a move would amount to “judicial activism.” 
  
 “It makes him look foolish as a lawyer,” Priebus said. 
  
 Money Advantage 
  
 Both party leaders suggested the other will have an advantage when it comes to fundraising. Priebus said he doesn’t know if Republicans would be able to take in as much as Obama, though he said the election will boil down to ideological issues, not the $1 billion likely to be raised by either side. 
  
 Wasserman Schultz focused on Obama’s ban on taking money from lobbyists and other special interests. 
  
 “President Obama’s campaign and the Democratic Party is fueled by people,” she said. 
  
 Both expect a tough race for the White House. Priebus said Romney’s three primary wins on April 3, including in Priebus’s home state of Wisconsin (BEESWI), represent a “big night” for the party. 
  
 “Obviously I have to be neutral, but I don’t have to avoid the facts,” he said. “It was a good night for Mitt Romney.” 
  
 Wasserman Schultz said she expects Romney to have trouble in the general election because he has shifted positions on issues. “None of his positions have any conviction because he’s willing to change them at the drop of a hat,” she said. 
  
 The chairwoman disagreed with her rival when it came to predictions for congressional races, saying she expected Democrats to hang onto the U.S. Senate, while Priebus said Republicans can claim the chamber for their party. 
  
 “We’ve got so many opportunities in the Senate,” he said, predicting that Republicans will take over Democratic seats in Ohio, Virginia, Florida, Wisconsin and Hawaii. That would give Republicans a majority, overturning the Democrats 53-47 control. 
  
 To contact the reporter on this story: Kristin Jensen in Washington at kjensen@bloomberg.net; 
  
 To contact the editor responsible for this story: Jeanne Cummings at jcummings21@bloomberg.net ||||| Republican National Committee chair Reince Priebus denied that his party has a woman problem in a way that made a feminist argument, even if it was on accident: women shouldn't be considered a special interest group, but maybe old men should. "It's a fiction," Priebus said in an interview that will air on Bloomberg Television's Political Capital with Al Hunt this weekend. "If the Democrats said we had a war on caterpillars and every mainstream media outlet talked about the fact that Republicans have a war on caterpillars, then we’d have problems with caterpillars." Priebus is right, though for the wrong reason. Republicans don't have a problem with women -- they have a problem with everyone who's not a man over 50. 
  
 For years, some women have complained about being treated as an interest group, despite making up a slim majority of all human beings on Earth. Other women don't mind the interest group image: "The jury of women across America have ruled that the Republicans have been unbelievably extreme and out of touch and hyper-focused on cultural issues," Democratic National Committee chair Debbie Wasserman Schultz said an interview that will air on the same Bloomberg show. 
  
 But, as pundit and political consultant Philip Bump pointed out, young women are not acting like an interest group with preferences vastly different from the rest of the electorate, as Priebus indicated. In a USA Today/ Gallup poll released this week the major outliers are older men: Bump's chart, at left, shows that the poll finds men under 50, women under 50, and women over 50 all support President Obama over Romney by a signifiant margin. Men over 50 back Romney by 18 points. (Making up just 16 percent of the population in the 2010 census, perhaps men over 50 should form a special interest group?) Though USA Today credited "a huge shift of women to his side" for President Obama's 9-point lead over Mitt Romney in swing states, it'd be more accurate to credit the loyalty of old men for keeping Romney from being slaughtered in the poll. 
  
 And Wasserman Schultz's argument that women are freaked out by Republican positions on social issues is undercut by the fact that the Republican candidate most associated with social issues performs better with women than Romney does. That goes for swing state voters as well as Republican primary voters in several states. Instead of claiming that women are recoiling from contraception hearings and Rush Limbaugh insults, it would be more accurate for Wasserman Schultz to argue that it's old men who are cheering them on. 
  
 Want to add to this story? Let us know in comments or send an email to the author at ereeve at theatlantic dot com. You can share ideas for stories on the Open Wire. 
  
 Elspeth Reeve ||||| The seed for this crawl was a list of every host in the Wayback Machine 
  
 This crawl was run at a level 1 (URLs including their embeds, plus the URLs of all outbound links including their embeds) 
  
 The WARC files associated with this crawl are not currently available to the general public. |||||
A:
Enter the caterpillar. Republican National Committee chief Reince Priebus is generating headlines today with an insect analogy. In an interview with Bloomberg TV's Al Hunt, Priebus rejected charges that Republicans have a woman problem. “If the Democrats said we had a war on caterpillars and every mainstream media outlet talked about the fact that Republicans have a war on caterpillars, then we’d have problems with caterpillars,” he said. “It’s a fiction.” Democrats pounced. “To have the head of the GOP say these attacks on women are as fictional as a ‘war on caterpillars’ is callous and dismissive of what matters to women and completely out of touch,” said DNC chief Debbie Wasserman Schultz. (She's referring to bills like this one.) At the Washington Post, Aaron Blake suggests that Democrats are going a bit overboard in their reaction as they try to create an election issue. And at the Atlantic Wire, Elspeth Reeve agrees that Republicans don't have a problem with women. "They have a problem with everyone who's not a man over 50."