In this task, you are given a text of many news articles seperated by special token "|||||". Your task is to summarize them.
Q: UPDATED: Sweet Cakes: State orders Oregon bakery owners to pay $135,000 for denying service to same-sex couple 
  
 Updated at 2 p.m. 
  
  
  
 Oregon Labor Commissioner Brad Avakian on Thursday ordered the owners of a former Gresham bakery to pay $135,000 in damages to a lesbian couple for refusing to make them a wedding cake. 
  
 Avakian's ruling upheld a preliminary finding earlier this year that the owners of Sweet Cakes by Melissa had discriminated against the women on the basis of their sexual orientation. 
  
 Bakery owners Melissa and Aaron Klein cited their Christian beliefs against same-sex marriage in denying service. The case ignited a long-running skirmish in the nation's culture wars, pitting civil rights advocates against religious freedom proponents who argued business owners should have the right to refuse services for gay and lesbian weddings. 
  
 Avakian's final order makes clear that serving potential customers equally trumps the Kleins' religious beliefs. Under Oregon law, businesses cannot discriminate or refuse service based on sexual orientation, just as they cannot turn customers away because of race, sex, disability, age or religion, the Oregon Bureau of Labor and Industries said in a news release. 
  
 "This case is not about a wedding cake or a marriage," Avakian wrote. "It is about a business's refusal to serve someone because of their sexual orientation. Under Oregon law, that is illegal. 
  
 "Within Oregon's public accommodations law is the basic principle of human decency that every person, regardless of their sexual orientation, has the freedom to fully participate in society. The ability to enter public places, to shop, to dine, to move about unfettered by bigotry." 
  
 Though the Oregon Equality Act of 2007 includes an exemption for religious organizations and schools, it does not permit private business owners to deny service and discriminate against potential customers, BOLI said. 
  
 The commissioner ordered the Kleins to pay $75,000 to Rachel Bowman-Cryer and $60,000 to Laurel Bowman-Cryer. His ruling may be appealed to the Oregon Court of Appeals. 
  
 Anna Harmon, one of three lawyers representing the Kleins, said Thursday an appeal is likely. 
  
 "That's up to our clients," Harmon said. "I believe at this point they are intending to preserve their constitutional rights as much as they can, and that would look like an appeal." 
  
 In a statement issued through their attorney, Paul A. Thompson, the Bowman-Cryers thanked BOLI for "sending a clear message that discrimination will simply not be tolerated in our state." 
  
 "This has been a terrible ordeal for our entire family. We never imagined finding ourselves caught up in a fight for social justice," they said. "We endured daily, hateful attacks on social media, received death threats and feared for our family's safety, yet our goal remained steadfast. We were determined to ensure that this kind of blatant discrimination never happened to another couple, another family, another Oregonian." 
  
 The controversy began in January 2013 when the Kleins turned away Rachel Cryer, as she was known then, and her mother from their bakery. 
  
 In August 2013, Cryer and her partner complained to the state Bureau of Labor and Industries. The agency conducted an investigation and in January 2014 brought charges that the Kleins had unlawfully discriminated against the couple because of their sexual orientation. 
  
 BOLI investigators said the Kleins' refusal violated the women's civil rights and recommended they pay $75,000 in damages to each woman for emotional suffering. 
  
 That triggered a conciliation process between the two parties to see if a settlement could be reached. The Kleins and the state, acting on the women's behalf, could not agree, so the case went before Alan McCullough, a BOLI administrative law judge. 
  
 During a hearing in March, both women testified to the emotional stress they attributed to their experience with Sweet Cakes as well as the glare of media attention that followed. 
  
 On Jan. 17, 2013, Cryer brought her mother, Cheryl McPherson, to a cake tasting appointment she had set up with Melissa Klein. That day, Melissa stayed home with the couple's twin 8-month-old-boys and Aaron went to the bakery. When he asked for the names of the bride and groom, Cryer said there would be two brides. 
  
 "I said, 'I'm very sorry, I believe I have wasted your time. We do not do cakes for same sex weddings,' " Klein testified. 
  
 Aaron Klein said his family, too, had suffered because of the case. Reporters came to his home and his shop, he testified during the March hearing. 
  
 The Sweet Cakes by Melissa car was vandalized and broken into twice. Photographers and florists severed ties with the company, eventually forcing Sweet Cakes to close the Gresham shop in September 2013. The business now operates out of the couple's home in Sandy. 
  
 Following the hearing, McCullough recommended $75,000 in damages be awarded to Rachel Bowman-Cryer and $60,000 to Laurel Bowman-Cryer. 
  
 This post will be updated. 
  
 -- George Rede 
  
 grede@oregonian.com 
  
 503-294-4004 
  
 @georgerede ||||| Bureau of Labor and Industries’ ruling comes after Portland-area shop Sweet Cakes by Melissa would not bake wedding cake, but bakers could appeal 
  
 The owners of a Portland-area bakery that denied service to a same-sex couple must pay $135,000 in damages, the bureau of labor and industries has ruled. 
  
 The damages are for emotional suffering caused by Sweet Cakes by Melissa, which two years ago refused to bake a wedding cake for Laurel and Rachel Bowman-Cryer. 
  
 A 2007 Oregon law protects the rights of LGBT people in employment, housing and public accommodations. It provides an exemption for religious organisations, but the agency ruled that exemption does not allow private businesses to discriminate against potential customers. 
  
 “This case is not about a wedding cake or a marriage. It is about a business’s refusal to serve someone because of their sexual orientation. Under Oregon law, that is illegal,” Oregon labor commissioner Brad Avakian said in the final order. 
  
 In April, an administrative law judge proposed the same damages. 
  
 The bakers said their refusal to bake for the couple was prompted by religious beliefs. The case has been cited in the national debate over religious freedom and discrimination against gays. 
  
 Bakery owners Aaron and Melissa Klein closed their Gresham store in 2013 and operate the business from home. They can still file an appeal with the Oregon court of appeals. 
  
 One of the Kleins’ attorneys, Anna Harmon, criticised the order, saying it was a case of “an overpowered elected official using his position to root out thought and speech with which he personally disagrees”. 
  
 Avakian’s order is unconstitutional, Harmon said, because “the right to speak freely, to think uniquely, and to live according to our faith is the bedrock of this country”. 
  
 But Jeana Frazzini, co-director of the gay-rights group Basic Rights Oregon, praised the order. 
  
 “This case struck a chord with many Oregonians because allowing businesses to deny goods and services to people because of who they are and whom they love is hurtful and wrong,” she said in a statement. |||||
A: 
An Oregon bakery's refusal to serve a lesbian couple has resulted in the most expensive wedding cake never baked in recent memory after the state labor board ordered Sweet Cakes by Melissa to pay $135,000 in damages for discrimination. The case dates back to January 2013, reports the Oregonian, when Sweet Cakes by Melissa owners Melissa and Aaron Klein refused to bake a wedding cake for Rachel and Laurel Bowman-Cryer, citing their Christian beliefs. The Bowman-Cryers filed a complaint, a ruckus ensued, and the state found early last year that the Kleins had violated their civil rights. "This case is not about a wedding cake or a marriage," wrote Oregon's labor commissioner. "It is about a business's refusal to serve someone because of their sexual orientation. Under Oregon law, that is illegal." While exemptions exist for religious organizations, businesses have no such legal protection, and all citizens must retain "the ability to enter public places, to shop, to dine, to move about unfettered by bigotry," he wrote. Klein had already closed her storefront and now operates her business out of her home. The Bowman-Cryers thanked the state for "sending a clear message that discrimination will simply not be tolerated in our state." The Kleins may appeal, and their lawyer indicates they'll do so, reports the Guardian, calling the labor commissioner "an overpowered elected official using his position to root out thought and speech with which he personally disagrees."