Teacher:In this task, you are given a text of many news articles seperated by special token "|||||". Your task is to summarize them.
Teacher: Now, understand the problem? Solve this instance: During Monday night’s Presidential debate, the concept of stop and frisk came up. The practice, once used by police as a method of searching people without arresting them (which would require probable cause), was highly controversial. Hillary Clinton mentioned that it was ruled unconstitutional, but Donald Trump insisted that it wasn’t. In fact, he cut-off moderator Lester Holt, and told him “You’re wrong” when Holt asserted that a judge ruled it unconstitutional. 
  
 “It went before a judge who was a very against police judge. It was taken away from her and our mayor, our new mayor, refused to go forward with the case. they would have won an appeal,” he said. But that’s not entirely accurate. 
  
 Trump is wrong about the judge’s ruling, but it’s complicated. U.S. District Court Judge Shira Scheindlin did rule in 2013 that the stop and frisk practice violated the Constitution in the landmark case, Floyd v. City of New York. But it didn’t end there. 
  
 Judge Scheindlin ruled that stop and frisk, in practice, had a discriminatory effect on blacks and Hispanics, violating the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments. “The Equal Protection Clause’s prohibition on selective enforcement means that suspicious blacks and Hispanics may not be treated differently by the police than equally suspicious whites,” the judge said. You can read Judge Scheindlin’s opinion below. 
  
 However, the city did ask the Second Circuit Court of Appeals to vacate the ruling, but the court said no. Scheindlin was removed from the case, so Trump was right about that. The city later reached a settlement with the plaintiffs that involved withdrawing their appeal. 
  
 Floyd v City of NY ||||| Giuliani: I'd skip next debates if I were Trump 
  
 Donald Trump should skip the next two debates unless he gets special guarantees from the moderators, former New York mayor and top Trump adviser Rudy Giuliani told reporters after the debate. 
  
 Lester Holt, the NBC News anchor who moderated the debate, should be “ashamed of himself,” Giuliani said after the debate. He said Holt was wrong to attempt to fact-check Trump on the constitutionality of stop-and-frisk and his claimed opposition to the Iraq War. 
  
 Story Continued Below 
  
 “If I were Donald Trump I wouldn’t participate in another debate unless I was promised that the journalist would act like a journalist and not an incorrect, ignorant fact checker,” Giuliani said. “The moderator would have to promise that there would be a moderator and not a fact checker and in two particular cases an enormously ignorant, completely misinformed fact checker.” 
  
 “If you wonder why Donald Trump thinks that the press is a left-wing basically oriented group, Lester Holt proved it tonight," he added. 
  
 He later clarified about future debates: “I didn’t say what I’m advising him, I said what I would do.” 
  
 Trump himself had no problem with Holt's performance. The moderator did a "fine" job, Trump said. 
  
 But Giuliani was especially piqued by Holt’s claim that “stop and frisk was ruled unconstitutional in New York.” 
  
 “No, you're wrong. It went before a judge who was a very-against-police judge,” Trump responded. “It was taken away from her and our mayor, our new mayor, refused to go forward with the case. They would have won an appeal.” 
  
 “Stop and frisk is completely constitutional and the American people have been given the false impression that it isn’t,” Giuliani said. 
  
 A federal district court judge ruled in 2013 that New York City’s stop-and-frisk policy violated the Constitution. Mayor Bill de Blasio, who ran on a platform opposing stop-and-frisk, ended the policy soon after taking office. |||||
Student:
Donald Trump thinks that he was the clear winner of Monday's debate and that moderator Lester Holt did a "great job" with "very fair" questions. But if Rudy Giuliani were Trump, he'd take a hard pass on the last two debates, per the Hill. Or at least not "unless I was promised the journalist would act like a journalist, and not an ignorant fact check," the former NYC mayor said after the debate, as shown in a Bloomberg video. (Starting around the 16:15 mark.) "My advice would be the moderator would have to promise they'd be a moderator." Giuliani especially took umbrage at Holt's "outrageous" input during a discussion on the controversial stop-and-frisk policy Giuliani put into place while he was New York's mayor (current Mayor Bill de Blasio has since nixed the program). Holt said the practice had been ruled "unconstitutional" in New York, which hit a nerve with Giuliani. "If journalism has ethics, Lester Holt [was] unethically interfering in the area of law he knows nothing about," Giuliani said, adding, "It is not unconstitutional." (The Hill notes it was ruled unconstitutional by a circuit court judge but was never given the final word by a higher court. See LawNewz for a more in-depth explanation.) "If you wonder why Donald Trump thinks that the press is a left-wing basically oriented group, Lester Holt proved it tonight," Giuliani said, per Politico. (Giuliani's take on Black Lives Matter: It's "inherently racist.")