You will be given a definition of a task first, then some input of the task.
In this task, you are given a text of many news articles seperated by special token "|||||". Your task is to summarize them.

Welcome! 
  
 As a member of the Utah Food Allergy Network (UFAN) and mom of an allergic kid, I've learned food allergies are easier to handle with information, a few handy tools, and a community of friends who “get it.” I post a new article most Mondays. Thanks for stopping by! 
  
  
  
 Kelley 
  
  
  
  ||||| FILE - This image released by Columbia Pictures shows Peter Rabbit, voiced by James Corden and Cottontail in a scene from "Peter Rabbit." The filmmakers and the studio behind it are apologizing for insensitively... (Associated Press) 
  
 FILE - This image released by Columbia Pictures shows Peter Rabbit, voiced by James Corden and Cottontail in a scene from "Peter Rabbit." The filmmakers and the studio behind it are apologizing for insensitively depicting a character's allergy in the film that has prompted backlash online. Sony Pictures... (Associated Press) 
  
 FILE - This image released by Columbia Pictures shows Peter Rabbit, voiced by James Corden and Cottontail in a scene from "Peter Rabbit." The filmmakers and the studio behind it are apologizing for insensitively depicting a character's allergy in the film that has prompted backlash online. Sony Pictures... (Associated Press) FILE - This image released by Columbia Pictures shows Peter Rabbit, voiced by James Corden and Cottontail in a scene from "Peter Rabbit." The filmmakers and the studio behind it are apologizing for insensitively... (Associated Press) 
  
 LOS ANGELES (AP) — "Peter Rabbit" filmmakers and the studio behind it are apologizing for insensitively depicting a character's allergy in the film that has prompted backlash online. 
  
 Sony Pictures says Sunday in a joint statement with the filmmakers that "food allergies and are a serious issue" and the film "should not have made light" of a character being allergic to blackberries "even in a cartoonish, slapstick way." 
  
 In "Peter Rabbit" which was released this weekend, the character of Mr. McGregor is allergic to blackberries. The rabbits fling the fruit at him in a scene and he is forced to use an EpiPen. 
  
 The charity group Kids with Food Allergies posted a warning about the scene on its Facebook page Friday prompting some on Twitter to start using the hashtag #boycottpeterrabbit. The group said that allergy jokes are harmful to their community and that making light of the condition "encourages the public not to take the risk of allergic reactions seriously." 
  
 Kenneth Mendez, the president and CEO of the Asthma and Allergy Foundation of America, wrote an open letter to the studio Saturday asking for the opportunity to educate the company and the film's cast on the realities of food allergies and urged the studio to "examine your portrayal of bullying in your films geared toward a young audience." 
  
 The studio and filmmakers say that they, "Sincerely regret not being more aware and sensitive to this issue, and we truly apologize." ||||| There has been a lot of talk in the food allergy community about the new The Smurfs 2 movie because of a certain scene involving peanut allergy. Allergic Living asked me to see the movie and review it, from the allergy perspective. Along for her point of view was my 12-year-old daughter, who has severe allergies to dairy, egg, peanut, all tree nuts and most legumes. 
  
 So off we went. While I was prepared to be outraged, I also wondered whether the movie would prove a sign that the entertainment industry was starting to pay lip service to food allergies. With statistics like 1 in 13 children having food allergies, would this turn out to be an example of tokenism? 
  
 Let’s cut to the big scene in question: the birthday party. In the scene, the Smurf’s human friends, Patrick and Grace Winslow, are hosting the party for their son and are reviewing their checklist of cautions. The food is gluten-free, vegan, no peanuts or strawberries, produced humanely and served on BPA-free dishes. So far, so good. 
  
 When the man’s stepfather, the owner of a corndog company, arrives with corndogs for partygoers, parents ask about peanuts. He assures everyone that his company does not put peanuts in the corndogs. The peanut-allergic child takes a bite before the man can finish his sentence – that they are, though, cooked in peanut oil. With lips swollen, the child is rushed off to the hospital. Later the audience learns that he’s OK. This is portrayed as a relief to the host because both of the child’s parents are lawyers, and that was mildly annoying. 
  
 I asked my daughter what she thought as someone with allergies. She felt that the birthday party scene was important as it helped to define the stepfather’s character – he’s an insensitive man who pushes his way into situations and manages to cause problems. Her one major issue was that no one administered epinephrine the allergic child. That would have been easy to include. 
  
 If this scene was the only reference to allergies, I might have felt that the writers had gone for a cheap laugh. But the concept of allergies runs through this film in a respectful way. In fact allergies play a pivotal role in a touching turning point that ties up several subplots. 
  
 So no, we didn’t have a big issue with the depiction of food allergies in The Smurfs 2. My daughter did not notice the fact that the stepfather didn’t take the reaction very seriously, and I simply found it realistic. Not all of our relatives ‘get it’ either and this reflected poorly on the older man. I’m pleased to report that I doubt many parents or kids living with food allergies would be offended by this movie. 
  
 As for the film as a whole, we thoroughly enjoyed it. There is plenty going on in the subplots to keep the adults’ attention. For the children, they will no doubt enjoy the juvenile humor with plenty of references to farts and name-calling. There isn’t any real violence but poor Gargamel is the butt of a lot of slapstick comedy. Hank Azaria and Neil Patrick Harris return to their roles and don’t disappoint. So yes, it was worth the price of admission. 
  
 Susan Clemens is the moderator of Allergic Living’s online Forum and Facebook page. Please let us know your own thoughts of how allergies were depicted in the movie – in the comments below or on our social media. 
  
  ||||| Image copyright Columbia/Sony Pictures/Kobal/REX/Shutterstock Image caption The scene in the new Peter Rabbit film involving blackberries led to calls for a boycott 
  
 The makers of the new film Peter Rabbit have apologised after facing a backlash over their depiction of a character's allergy. 
  
 A scene in the film shows a character who suffers a blackberry allergy being pelted with them by a gang of bunnies. 
  
 In a joint statement, Sony Pictures and the filmmakers said they "should not have made light" of the issue. 
  
 Campaigners condemned the scene and some Twitter users adopted the hashtag #boycottpeterrabbit. 
  
 The charity Kids with Food Allergies Foundation said in a Facebook post "food allergy 'jokes' are harmful to our community". 
  
 A petition calling on Sony Pictures to apologise also attracted thousands of signatures. 
  
 Image copyright Columbia/Sony Pictures/REX/Shutterstock Image caption Characters Cottontail, Flopsy and Mopsy use catapults to fire fruit and vegetables in one scene 
  
 The offending scene is shown in a film adaptation of the Beatrix Potter book Peter Rabbit, which was released in US cinemas this weekend. 
  
 The human character Tom McGregor, who has an allergy to the berries, is attacked by Peter and his friends who shower him with the fruit, even shooting one into his mouth, until he is forced to use an EpiPen to treat his reaction. 
  
 On Sunday, Sony Pictures said in a statement that it was wrong for the filmmakers to include the segment, "even in a cartoonish, slapstick way". 
  
 "We sincerely regret not being more aware and sensitive to this issue, and we truly apologise," the statement said. 
  
 Food allergies ||||| You probably remember Peter Rabbit as the lovable, impish star of wholesome childhood stories, but is he now a bully? 
  
 That’s what some parents are arguing after seeing the new Peter Rabbit film starring James Corden and directed by Will Gluck. The film, released on Friday in the U.S., grossed an estimated $25 million in its first weekend, out-earning every other film except the decidedly more grown-up Fifty Shades Darker, the final installment of the Fifty Shades of Grey trilogy. 
  
 The latest update to the classic children’s story features Peter Rabbit engaged in battle with the nephew of his traditional nemesis, the farmer Mr. McGregor. This nephew, as it turns out, has a blackberry allergy, a weakness Peter and his accomplices exploit in one battle scene. The rabbits pelt the younger Mr. McGregor with the berries and one goes into his mouth, causing him to go into anaphylactic shock and administer an EpiPen to himself. 
  
 Parents and advocacy groups have taken exception to this portrayal, calling it “allergy bullying” and saying it mocks allergy sufferers. The CEO of Allergy UK told The Telegraph the scene is irresponsible as it doesn’t portray the life-threatening danger of allergies and anaphylactic shock. On Saturday, the U.S.-based Food Allergy Research & Education organization warned on its Facebook page that the scene “might be upsetting” for viewers who have allergies. 
  
 Calls to boycott the film soon took off on Twitter, with people using #BoycottPeterRabbit to air their disappointment. 
  
 #PeterRabbitMovie @SonyPictures Would you laugh at a person with diabetes force fed sugar? No. But that's exactly what you're doing in your movie: continuing to marginalize people with #foodallergies. So throw an allergen at someone? I’m coming for you.#BoycottPeterRabbit — ☘️ Jamie ☘️ (@jamiefid) February 10, 2018 
  
 As a mother of a toddler allergic to several foods, I am disgusted that Sony would make a joke out of flicking an allergen at a food allergic individual. Doing so is felony aggravated assault! What kind of message does that scene send to kids?! #boycottpeterrabbit — hydrogirl71 (@hydrogirl71) February 10, 2018 
  
 But others soon began using the hashtag to criticise those encouraging a boycott for being too sensitive. 
  
 Just read this drivel today, #boycottpeterrabbit people getting offended over kids films. I remember violent cartoons as a child and I don’t recall brutally killing anyone growing up. Have some faith in your kids, breathe, and remember its just a stupid film about talking rabbits — Nick Fitzpatrick (@nicknogger) February 11, 2018 
  
 Sony Pictures and the filmmakers have issued an apology for the scene, saying they “should not have made light” of the issue. |||||
Output:
If you're wondering why there's a hashtag to boycott a new children's movie, ask parents of kids with allergies. The BBC reports on the pushback against Sony Pictures' Peter Rabbit, which includes a scene in which Mr. McGregor, who's allergic to blackberries, gets the fruit hurled at him by the title character and his bunny pals. One berry ends up in McGregor's mouth, causing him to go into anaphylactic shock and forcing the use of his EpiPen. "I'm pretty sure Beatrix Potter will be turning in her grave about now," one mom of a child with allergies tells the New York Times. She notes allergies are already often dismissed or ignored by people who aren't affected by them, and that "to have them trivialized on the big screen by such a popular character is immensely disappointing." Other parents and advocacy groups agree the film, with James Corden voicing Peter, is partaking in "allergy bullying," per Fortune. Kenneth Mendez, president of the Asthma and Allergy Foundation of America, penned an open letter to the filmmakers and Sony, noting that "we strongly urge you to refrain from the type of programming that mocks food allergies in the future." Mendez also points out that Sony has portrayed food allergies as a "punchline" before in children's films, citing one of the Smurfs movies and Cloudy With a Chance of Meatballs as two examples. Per the AP, Sony has issued a joint statement with the filmmakers apologizing for the scene, admitting the flick shouldn't have "made light" of the character's allergy, "even in a cartoonish, slapstick way." (New guidelines are out on giving babies peanuts.)