Instructions: In this task, you are given a text of many news articles seperated by special token "|||||". Your task is to summarize them.
Input: Carly Fiorina's crisp, confident performance in the last GOP debate made her a rising star. But her latest poll numbers, at first glance, don't look good. 
  
 Is the English language becoming less significant in Europe after Brexit? 
  
 Why migrants, en route to the United States, are pausing in Mexico 
  
 Why the new health-care bill may keep affordable care out of reach for some 
  
 US Republican presidential candidate Carly Fiorina speaks at the North Texas Presidential Forum hosted by the Faith & Freedom Coalition and Prestonwood Baptist Church in Plano, Texas, on Sunday. 
  
 What’s happened to Carly Fiorina’s presidential campaign? She was supposed to be a Republican rising star, propelled upward by her crisp dissection of Donald Trump in the last GOP debate. But her latest poll numbers, at first glance, look awful. 
  
 Over the past month, she’s dropped from 9 to 5 percent in Fox News surveys, for instance. She’s gone from 11 to 7 percent in NBC News polls. 
  
 Worst of all, she’s cratered in CNN/ORC’s just-released numbers, plummeting from 15 percent in mid-September to 4 percent today. 
  
 Meanwhile, her fellow nonpolitical outsiders, Mr. Trump and Ben Carson, have stabilized in the polls and even crept upward. All this has caused some pundits to declare that Ms. Fiorina’s campaign is kaput. 
  
 “Carly Fiorina’s moment in the spotlight seems to have already passed,” writes The Week’s Becca Stanek. 
  
 Well, that might be right. Fiorina may be following the classic path of a little-known candidate, described by political scientists as a cycle of discovery, scrutiny, and decline. 
  
 First, voters are excited to stumble upon a new face they like. Think Herman Cain in 2012. That person rises quickly in the polls, while the news media scramble to discover all they can about the individual. They print and broadcast this, and not all of it is flattering. Disappointed voters then move on, looking for their next political crush. 
  
 This template might explain Fiorina’s drop. Following her debate performance on Sept. 16, she rose from a blip in the polls to about 12 percent in the RealClearPolitics rolling average of major surveys. The rise was rapid – voters obviously responded to her verbal dexterity and air of stage command. 
  
 Then the scrutiny phase began. And for Fiorina, this meant lots of stories about her tenure as head of Hewlett-Packard, during which the iconic firm lost half its market value, and she fired more than 30,000 workers. 
  
 Fiorina insists that she was shaking up a firm otherwise destined to fail. But most voters didn’t know about her CEO history, and they may have backed away from her regardless. 
  
 Fiorina was also caught up in a discussion about abortion at the time of her debate rise. Her passionate criticism of Planned Parenthood thrilled many conservative voters. But Democrats and some fact-checkers questioned whether her description of a video that alleged abuses on the part of the group was accurate. 
  
 For Fiorina, the problem might not have been this controversy per se, but the fact that it chewed up time and attention she might better have spent on other things. 
  
 “Instead of using her moment in the spotlight to discuss a range of issues and further introduce herself to voters, she ... trained her focus on Planned Parenthood,” writes CNN’s Sara Murray. 
  
 But here’s the bottom line: The “decline” part of the new candidate cycle does not have to be permanent. Some hopefuls survive the scrutiny phase, take some lumps, and then rise again. That’s the nature of a campaign. 
  
 More debates are coming. Fiorina might profit by that exposure. And this time, she’s got plenty of money to capitalize on any bump: She raised almost $7 million during the third quarter of 2015, a substantial improvement over her previous inflow. 
  
 She’s now got about $5.5 million cash on hand. Trump might need to practice his debate skills. For the time being, Fiorina isn’t going anywhere. ||||| Remember Carly Fiorina? It now seems forever ago, but in late September she was being heralded as the next big thing in the Republican primary field—the outsider candidate who could marshall establishment support, and finally slay the Trump dragon. 
  
 Now look at the polls. An NBC/Wall Street Journal poll Monday has her at 7 percent, running behind the much-maligned Jeb Bush. That’s down from 11 in late September. A CNN poll released Tuesday is even bleaker. She comes in fourth—tied with also-ran Chris Christie and behind Rand Paul, who’s on campaign deathwatch. That’s even worse than it seems, because in mid-September she was at 15 percent in the same poll, good for second place. 
  
 So what happened to Fiorina? There’s no single obvious explanation, but here are a few ideas. 
  
 Fiorina’s polling has correlated strongly with her debate performance. She surged after dominating the undercard at the first Republican debate in August, and after winning a promotion to the main stage for the second debate, she was the consensus winner there, too. After each debate, her numbers surged. But there hasn’t been a GOP debate for more than a month, since September 16. 
  
 In that time, her stock has plummeted. Fiorina has practically disappeared from the headlines in the last few weeks. She doesn’t seem to be as good at collecting “earned media”—attention in the press, more or less. Donald Trump and Ben Carson, in contrast, are great at creating controversies that get them on TV. John Sides at The Monkey Cage has been on a crusade to convince readers that Trump’s high polling, and any dips, are caused almost entirely by the level of media attention he receives. Carson’s statements about the Holocaust and gun control, or about the Umpqua massacre, may be derided by some, but they keep his name in the news—and they rile up supporters who see criticism of his remarks as persecution. (Fiorina pulled something similar off when she insisted she’d seen a video taken at a Planned Parenthood that did not exist, but that moment passed, and she hasn’t created another.) 
  
 People have been predicting the demise of Trump’s campaign since, well, before it existed, but the drumbeat actually grew after the second debate, in which he was generally said to have put in a subpar performance. But as Molly Ball points out today, that hasn’t happened—he’s really running. |||||
Output:
A CNN poll out Tuesday has bad news for Carly Fiorina: In one month, she's gone from 15% to 4% and slipped from second place into a tie for seventh. Her support seems to be cratering even as support for the other two "outsider" candidates, Donald Trump and Ben Carson, is rising. What's going on? For one thing, the GOP hasn't had a debate in weeks, and that's where Fiorina has shined, writes David Graham at the Atlantic. She's also struggled to get what Graham calls "earned media," or consistent attention in the press. "It’s also possible, though, that Fiorina’s support was never really there, that she was a paper tiger erected by the press," writes Graham. "She doesn’t seem to have a natural constituency, doesn’t have much establishment support, and doesn’t have the same mix of charisma and outlandish comments that has boosted Trump." At the Christian Science Monitor, Peter Grier writes that Fiorina has gone through a classic cycle of an underdog candidate—"discovery, scrutiny, and decline." Her performance in the debates got her discovered, but then negative headlines followed about her tenure as CEO at Hewlett-Packard and then over allegations that she exaggerated the content of Planned Parenthood videos. But here's the upside for Fiorina backers: "The 'decline' part of the new candidate cycle does not have to be permanent," writes Grier. "Some hopefuls survive the scrutiny phase, take some lumps, and then rise again." Considering that Fiorina got a big fundraising bump during her rise in the polls and has $5.5 million on hand, she has a chance to do just that. Click for Grier's full column, or for Graham's.