Detailed Instructions: In this task, you are given a text of many news articles seperated by special token "|||||". Your task is to summarize them.
Q: It is difficult to convey the excitement I first felt when it was revealed that His Holiness Pope Francis was invited to Washington D.C. to address the world from the floor of the House of Representatives. Many believed, like I did, that this was an opportunity for the Pope to be one of the world’s great religious advocates and address the current intolerance of religious freedom. An opportunity to urgently challenge governments to properly address the persecution and execution of Christians and religious minorities; to address the heinous and senseless murders committed by ISIS and other terrorist organizations. An opportunity to address the enslavement, belittlement, rape and desecration of Christian women and children; to address the condoned, subsidized, intentionally planned genocide of unborn children by Planned Parenthood and society; and finally, an opportunity for His Holiness to refocus our priorities on right from wrong. 
  
  
  
 Media reports indicate His Holiness instead intends to focus the brunt of his speech on climate change--a climate that has been changing since first created in Genesis. More troubling is the fact that this climate change talk has adopted all of the socialist talking points, wrapped false science and ideology into “climate justice” and is being presented to guilt people into leftist policies. If the Pope stuck to standard Christian theology, I would be the first in line. If the Pope spoke out with moral authority against violent Islam, I would be there cheering him on. If the Pope urged the Western nations to rescue persecuted Christians in the Middle East, I would back him wholeheartedly. But when the Pope chooses to act and talk like a leftist politician, then he can expect to be treated like one. Artist and columnist Maureen Mullarkey effectively communicated this fallacy stating, “When papal preferences, masked in a Christian idiom, align themselves with ideological agendas (e.g. radical environmentalism) [they] impinge on democratic freedoms and the sanctity of the individual.” 
  
 The earth’s climate has been changing since God created it, with or without man. On that, we should all agree. In Pope Francis’ encyclical on the environment (written with the consultation of that great seminary the EPA and its embattled head Gina McCarthy), he condemned anyone skeptical of the link between human activity and climate change and adopted the false science being propagated by the Left. If the Pope wants to devote his life to fighting climate change then he can do so in his personal time. But to promote questionable science as Catholic dogma is ridiculous. 
  
  
  
 Furthermore, I am a proud Catholic. I chose to attend a Jesuit college in the Midwest, not just for my undergraduate but also my graduate studies (D.D.S.). I received an excellent education where I was taught to think critically, to welcome debate and discussion and to be held accountable for my actions; a trademark of a Jesuit education. And finally, I am a Conservative, a member of Congress, a constitutionalist and adamant defender of our Republic; an American that believes in strict adherence to the rule of law and a firm believer in our First Amendment protections, in this particular discussion, the freedom of religion. 
  
 So at this pivotal moment in world history, His Holiness, Pope Francis, is intending to spend the majority of his time on one of the world’s greatest stages focusing on climate change. I have both a moral obligation and leadership responsibility to call out leaders, regardless of their titles, who ignore Christian persecution and fail to embrace opportunities to advocate for religious freedom and the sanctity of human life. If the Pope plans to spend the majority of his time advocating for flawed climate change policies, then I will not attend. It is my hope that Pope Francis realizes his time is better spent focusing on matters like religious tolerance and the sanctity of all life. As the leader of the Catholic Church, and as a powerful voice for peace throughout the world, His Holiness has a real opportunity to change the climate of slaughter in the Middle East… not the fool’s errand of climate change. ||||| Rep. Paul Gosar, an Arizona Republican and a Catholic, said Friday he will boycott next week’s address to Congress by Pope Francis because he believes the pope will focus on climate change instead of “religious tolerance and the sanctity of life.” 
  
 Gosar published an op-ed on the conservative news site Townhall: 
  
 “I have both a moral obligation and leadership responsibility to call out leaders, regardless of their titles, who ignore Christian persecution and fail to embrace opportunities to advocate for religious freedom and the sanctity of human life.” 
  
 The he dismissed the pope’s recent encyclical calling for swift action on climate change, saying the climate has been changing “since God created it, with or without man … If the Pope wants to devote his life to fighting climate change then he can do so in his personal time. But to promote questionable science as Catholic dogma is ridiculous.” 
  
 Gosar added, “When the Pope chooses to act and talk like a leftist politician, then he can expect to be treated like one.” 
  
 The congressman reiterated those concerns to reporters Friday afternoon, saying he will not attend “without assurances” the pope would not focus his comments on climate change. He said “there are others that have gone to Rome to ask him to talk about the genocide that is occurring,” but it is clear that “he’s going to talk about climate change.” 
  
 While Gosar was the only congressman saying he would boycott the speech, he was not the only one raising concerns about the pope’s choice of topics. 
  
 Rep. John Fleming, R-La., told USA TODAY on Friday, “What I’m a little concerned about is that the pope seems to distract at times from some of the most important issues of faith — which is life — and he talks about issues like climate change.” The pope has “made some statements that would suggest that there may be certain level of acceptance of abortion,” Fleming said, and he would like to see the pope use his remarks to “re-emphasize the importance of protecting life and preventing abortion.” ||||| The seed for Wide00014 was: 
  
 - Slash pages from every domain on the web: 
  
  
  
  
  
 -- a ranking of all URLs that have more than one incoming inter-domain link (rank was determined by number of incoming links using Wide00012 inter domain links) 
  
  
  
 -- up to a maximum of 100 most highly ranked URLs per domain 
  
 - Top ranked pages (up to a max of 100) from every linked-to domain using the Wide00012 inter-domain navigational link graph |||||
A:
"When the Pope chooses to act and talk like a leftist politician, then he can expect to be treated like one," Rep. Paul Gosar of Arizona writes in an op-ed published yesterday on Town Hall. Gosar, a Catholic, is boycotting Pope Francis' scheduled address to Congress next week because he believes the Pope will focus on climate change instead of more important issues like abortion, "violent Islam," and the persecution of Christians. Gosar writes that Earth's climate has been changing "since first created in Genesis" and bashes the Pope for not focusing on "standard Christian theology." "If the Pope wants to devote his life to fighting climate change then he can do so in his personal time," he writes. "But to promote questionable science as Catholic dogma is ridiculous." Gosar says he won't attend unless there are "assurances" the pontiff won't be discussing climate change, USA Today reports. A spokesperson for Gosar—who is currently trying to impeach an EPA administrator—tells Politico other legislators are interested in joining the boycott, but he was unable to give any names. Rep. John Fleming of Louisiana tells USA Today he plans to attend the address but hopes the Pope will use his time to re-emphasize the evils of abortion instead of wasting time on climate change. Politico reports the "vast majority" of the world's scientists say the Earth is getting warmer mostly due to human activity.