Instructions: In this task, you are given a text of many news articles seperated by special token "|||||". Your task is to summarize them.
Input: Getty 
  
 Spending days ringside to other people’s parents bickering and arguing and general dysfunction takes a soul strong of stomach and long on patience, which is why only a hardy few to be a family court judge. But it doesn’t mean they’re not funny. Either that, or one Canadian justice found an unusual way to vent. Sick of the shenanigans of a couple from, ironically, the honeymoon capital of Niagara, he ruled that the wife should have full custody of their 13-year-old daughter but that the father should only pay $1 (and that’s a Canadian dollar) a month in child support. But it was the way he ruled that has everyone talking. 
  
 Ontario Superior Court Judge Joseph Quinn’s 31-page December decision—which made the local papers and is still doing the rounds of legal circles on the internet—is filled with the kind of black humor and derision one would imagine is usually kept for close be-robed colleagues only. He chided the couple for “marinating in a mutual hatred so intense as to surely amount to a personality disorder,” and said the chances of amicable resolution were “laughable.” The wife had poisoned their daughter “irreparably” against the father who, the judge admitted, had “a near-empty parenting tool box.” (More on TIME.com: 5 New Reasons to Get or Stay Married This Year) 
  
 Quinn mocked the couple’s habit of sending abusive, vulgarity-laced texts to each other and their inability to be civil at their children’s sporting events. On one occasion apparently, Catherine, the wife, had tried to run Larry over with her car — “always a telltale sign that a husband and wife are drifting apart,” the judge noted. 
  
 Catherine’s relatives, several of whom are Hell’s Angels, made death threats against her ex , which the judge mentioned, adding that “on Oct. 18, 2007, a nautical theme was added. According to Larry, ‘Catherine’s sister-in-law yelled out her window that I was going to be floating in the canal dead.’ ” That Catherine told her children they’d go to jail if they even called their dad did not help matters. 
  
 Larry, meanwhile, was given to flipping the bird every time he drove past his ex-wife’s house, leading the justice to observe that “a finger is worth a thousand words and therefore, is particularly useful should one have a vocabulary of less than a thousand words.” (More on TIME.com: Why Married Men Are Less Antisocial) 
  
 Quinn knew his tone was harsh but defended it saying since the parties were “immune to reason” he had used ridicule as a last resort. Is there a standup circuit for the legal set? 
  
 More on TIME.com: 
  
 Healthland’s Guide to Life 2011 
  
 5 Little-Known Truths About American Sex Lives 
  
 Can an iPhone App Save Your Marriage? ||||| Faced with warring ex-spouses besieging one another with threats and verbal abuse and dragging their children into it too, Ontario Superior Judge Joseph Quinn resorted to the only tool he had left - a highly unusual verbal roasting. 
  
 "Paging Dr. Freud, paging Dr. Freud," Judge Quinn began a recent judgment that has gone viral in the family-law community. "Here, a husband and wife have been marinating in a mutual hatred so intense as to surely amount to a personality disorder requiring treatment. The source of difficulties is hatred: a hardened, harmful, high-octane hatred." 
  
 Judge Quinn's 31-page decision boils over with the frustrations of a family-law judge who is called upon time and again to referee bouts between couples who were once in love. He even takes a shot at family law itself, saying that spousal support is "the roulette of family law - blindfolds, darts and Ouija boards being optional." 
  
 And he anticipates criticism of his tone: "The parties repeatedly have shown they are immune to reason. Consequently, in my decision, I have tried ridicule as a last resort." 
  
 In a novel twist, Judge Quinn granted the wife, Catherine, sole custody of the feuding couple's 13-year-old daughter. However, he ordered Larry to pay Catherine just a dollar a month in spousal support. 
  
 Judge Quinn expressed disgust with the way Catherine has induced her daughter to detest her father. "The harm is irreparable," he said. "Generally, it is unwise to place an immature 13-year-old in charge of her life. Here, however, Catherine and [her current partner]have engineered an alienation that is so complete as to leave the court with no feasible option." 
  
 Toronto lawyer Phil Epstein, an expert in family law, describes Judge Quinn as a respected jurist who was justified in ridiculing the couple. "I'm sure there will be some who criticize Justice Quinn for this," he said. "But others will say that sometimes you have to step back and laugh at the foibles of mankind." 
  
 Family law judges spent their time dealing with inflamed litigants whose stories are "highly conflicting and replete with inappropriate behaviour and misconduct," Mr. Epstein said. "They use the courtroom as a forum for all the wrongs that have been done to them in their marriage. It is not surprising that some judges try to find a better way to help resolve their problems." 
  
 Alternating caustic gibes with amusing observations, Judge Quinn portrayed Catherine - a 36-year-old school caretaker - and Larry, a labourer, as vile, foul-mouthed creatures who had burned through an enormous amount of police and court time waging their futile blitzkrieg. 
  
 He said that they cannot attend their son's ball hockey games without erupting into loud conflict, and that Catherine once tried to run over Larry with a van. "This is always a telltale sign that a husband and wife are drifting apart," Judge Quinn remarked dryly. 
  
 On three occasions, a niece of Catherine's who is engaged to a Hells Angels biker called Larry to warn him that he would be shot dead, Judge Quinn said. "On Oct. 18, 2007, a nautical theme was added," he remarked. "According to Larry, 'Catherine's sister-in-law yelled out her window that I was going to be floating in the canal dead.'" 
  
 Judge Quinn said that Larry, 38, possesses "a near-empty parenting tool box," and was fond of venting his anger by sending Catherine insulting text messages and giving her 'the finger' as he drove by her home. "A finger is worth a thousand words and therefore, is particularly useful should one have a vocabulary of less than a thousand words," Judge Quinn added. 
  
 Catherine gave her children "advanced animosity-tutoring," and repeatedly denied Larry access to them, Judge Quinn said. He said that on one occasion, Larry and his daughter were thrown out of a McDonald's restaurant because she was yelling that he was 'a deadbeat.' 
  
 "This is language she would have learned from Catherine," Judge Quinn noted. "They are the result of persistent, behind-the-scenes brainwashing by Catherine." 
  
 He said that Catherine also warned the children several times that if they attempted to telephone their father, they would go to jail. She also once text messaged her daughter while she was on an access visit with Larry to ask: "Is dickhead there?" 
  
 Judge Quinn said that he foolishly called a four-month hiatus during the trial in the hope that Larry and Catherine could benefit from mediation. "It is touching how a trial judge can retain his naivety even after 15 years on the bench," he said. 
  
 Report Typo/Error |||||
Output:
A divorce ruling from a Canadian family court judge who had clearly reached his limit has became a sensation in legal circles. Faced with a couple who was, in Judge Joseph Quinn's estimation, "immune to reason," the judge came down to their level and "tried ridicule as a last resort." Time has some highlights, including his assessment that the couple is "marinating in a mutual hatred so intense as to surely amount to a personality disorder." Other highlights: It begins, "Paging Dr. Freud" and calls chances of an amicable resolution "laughable." At one point, the wife tried to run over her husband with a car, "always a telltale sign that a husband and wife are drifting apart." The husband has a "near-empty parenting toolbox." Noting the husband's penchant for flipping the bird: "A finger is worth a thousand words and therefore, is particularly useful should one have a vocabulary of less than a thousand words." He granted sole custody of their 13-year-old daughter to the wife, only because she had turned the girl against her own dad with "advanced animosity-tutoring." He must pay only $1 a month in child care. Click for more.