Given the task definition and input, reply with output. In this task, you are given a text of many news articles seperated by special token "|||||". Your task is to summarize them.


  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
 Whoever digs a pit will fall into it; if someone rolls a stone, it will roll back on them.If you set a trap for others, you will get caught in it yourself. If you roll a boulder down on others, it will crush you instead.Whoever digs a pit will fall into it, and a stone will come back on him who starts it rolling.He who digs a pit will fall into it, and whoever rolls a stone, it will come back on him.He who digs a pit will fall into it, And he who rolls a stone, it will come back on him.Whoso diggeth a pit shall fall therein: and he that rolleth a stone, it will return upon him.The one who digs a pit will fall into it, and whoever rolls a stone--it will come back on him.If you dig a pit, you will fall in; if you start a stone rolling, it will roll back on you.People who set traps for others get caught themselves. People who start landslides get crushed.The one who digs a pit will fall into it, and whoever rolls a stone-- it will come back on him.Whoever digs a pit will fall into it, and the stone will come back on whoever starts it rolling.The one who digs a pit will fall into it; the one who rolls a stone--it will come back on him.Whoever digs a pit shall fall into it. Whoever rolls a stone, it will come back on him.He that digs a ditch will fall into it, and he that rolls a stone, it will return upon him.Whoever digs a pit will fall into it. Whoever rolls a stone will have it roll back on him.Whoso diggeth a pit shall fall therein; And he that rolleth a stone, it shall return upon him.He who digs a pit will fall into it, And he who rolls a stone, it will come back on him.Whosoever digs a pit shall fall therein, and he that rolls a stone, it will return upon him.Whosoever digs a pit shall fall in it: and he that rolls a stone, it will return upon him.Whoever digs a pit shall fall therein: and he that rolls a stone, it will return on him.Whoso diggeth a pit shall fall therein; And he that rolleth a stone, it shall return upon him.He that digs a pit for his neighbour shall fall into it: and he that rolls a stone, rolls it upon himself.He that diggeth a pit, shall fall into it: and he that rolleth a stone, it shall return to him.Whoso diggeth a pit shall fall therein; and he that rolleth a stone, it shall return upon him.Whoso diggeth a pit shall fall therein: and he that rolleth a stone, it shall return upon him.Whoever diggeth a pit shall fall into it: and he that rolleth a stone, it will return upon him.Whoever digs a pit shall fall into it. Whoever rolls a stone, it will come back on him.Whoso is digging a pit falleth into it, And the roller of a stone, to him it turneth. ||||| Reporter Julia Jenae and Sam Grover, the attorney who filed the complaint against Judge Randall Rogers, will answer your questions after a two-part investigation on his creative probation efforts. 
  
 Reporter Julia Jenae and Sam Grover, the attorney who filed the complaint against Judge Randall Rogers, will answer your questions after a two-part investigation on his creative probation efforts. 
  
 In August, a young Texas couple came forward with an unusual story to tell; a Judge forced them to get married. As it turns out, they weren't the only ones. (Source: KLTV Staff) 
  
 In August, a young Texas couple came forward with an unusual story to tell; a Judge forced them to get married. As it turns out, they weren't the only ones. (Source: KLTV Staff) 
  
 After an East Texas judge is criticized for requiring defendants in his court to get married and write Bible verses as a part of their criminal probation, a retired judge speaks out on his behalf. 
  
 Judge Randall Rogers of Smith County faced scrutiny after he gave Tyler resident Josten Bundy the option of marrying his 19-year old girlfriend or going to jail for 15 days. Bundy's story gained international attention in August and prompted the filing of an official complaint against the judge with the State Commission for Judicial Conduct. 
  
 RELATED: Judge sentences East Texas man to get married or face jail time 
  
 Rogers has declined to comment on his sentencing and probation practices, and retired district judge Cynthia Stevens Kent said that Rogers ethically can't respond. 
  
 "It’s incredibly frustrating for judges, but that’s part of the job – they have to just take the blows and not respond to it publicly, and just try to do their work," said Kent, who served on the bench in Smith County for 24 years. "The judge has enormous discretion [to set probation] as long as the conditions are meant to protect the victim, protect society, work toward rehabilitation of the individual." 
  
 Kent believes that giving couples an incentive to get married falls within the category of benefiting society. 
  
 "I think traditionally the family unit and that commitment and stability has been a positive thing in helping people not engage in criminal activity," said Kent. "I've known Judge Rogers for a long time, and I've known him to be thoughtful and hardworking." 
  
 RELATED: Texas judge tells couples: Get married or stay away from each other 
  
 Sam Grover, a Wisconsin attorney with the Freedom from Religion Foundation (FFRF) who filed the complaint against Rogers in August, disagrees. 
  
 "Judges are government actors and they need to keep their personal religious bias out of the courtroom," said Grover. "What we found is that Rogers ordered a man to write out Proverbs 26:27 twenty-five times a day, and get married to avoid going to jail." 
  
 Grover said a marriage order is not permissible and the the Bible verses homework violates the separation of church and state. 
  
 "This is one issue where the Freedom from Religion Foundation actually finds itself aligned with a lot of religious groups," Grover said. "They see marriage as a sacred thing between two people and they don’t really want a judge or a government official, weighing in on that." 
  
 The complaint with the State Commission on Judicial Conduct(SCJC) is pending. Grover said it can take up to a year to get a decision from the SCJC. The commission, that investigates the complaints against Texas judges it receives, is made up of 13 members including East Texas judge Joel Baker of Smith County. 
  
 Read: Freedom From Religion Foundation issues complaint against judge in forced marriage case 
  
 Despite the criticism from people across the nation, Kent said the incentive to marry through the courts is appropriate for the region. 
  
 "As the community attitude changes and shifts then sometimes the judges are a little behind that change and shift," said Kent. "I don’t know that this issue is a real change and shift in our community – I still think this is a community where family and marriage commitment is very important." 
  
 Grover said judges are generally immune from being sued for decisions they make on the bench. The typical way to fight a disagreeable ruling from a judge that you don't agree with is to appeal it to a higher court, but that didn't happen in any of the reported cases. 
  
 "We’re really just left with the judicial ethics commission as the only way to make sure that justice is served in this case," Grover said. 
  
 Rogers, who has been a judge for over 25 years ran unopposed for County Court at Law #2 judge in 2010 and 2014. He will be up for re-election in 2018. 
  
 Copyright 2015 KLTV. All rights reserved. |||||

Those who saw the story over the summer of the Texas judge who ordered a man to marry his girlfriend to avoid jail may have thought it was a weird one-off judgment—but it turns out that may be Randall Rogers' default consequence for unwed couples in his courtroom, KLTV reports. The outcry over Rogers' decree that 21-year-old Josten Bundy had to marry 19-year-old Elizabeth Jaynes or face 15 days in jail has led to the revelation of at least one similar ruling by the judge and resulted in a complaint against him with the State Commission for Judicial Conduct, per the station. "Judges are government actors and they need to keep their personal religious bias out of the courtroom," the attorney who filed the complaint in August tells KLTV. He adds that Rogers also violated the separation of church and state by ordering Bundy to write out Proverbs 26:27 ("If a man digs a pit, he will fall into it") 25 times a day. Bill Bull tells KLTV a similar story about his 27-year-old son, Benjerman, who faced Rogers on a misdemeanor theft charge in 2012 and felt compelled to marry his also-arrested girlfriend: The two were living together, and Rogers said they couldn't be around each other; that meant they had to move or risk jail for violating the order—but "if you get married, that's a different story," Rogers said, per the court transcript. Bull says the quickie marriage "made things worse" for his son and "created more financial and emotional problems." One person vouching for Rogers: retired judge Cynthia Stevens Kent, who knew Rogers well. "The judge has enormous discretion [to set probation] as long as the conditions are meant to protect the victim, protect society, work toward rehabilitation," she tells KLTV.