Teacher:In this task, you are given a text of many news articles seperated by special token "|||||". Your task is to summarize them.
Teacher: Now, understand the problem? Solve this instance: Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window) 
  
 Click to share on Google+ (Opens in new window) 
  
 Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window) 
  
 Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) 
  
 “Jealous” Johnny Depp demanded then-wife Amber Heard turn her back on a film with racy nude scenes during their troubled marriage, a new lawsuit claims. 
  
 Producers for the unreleased Heard film, “London Fields,” claim it was Depp who pressured her to refuse to support it. 
  
 The producers are suing Heard for $10 million for allegedly refusing to promote the movie and “falsely” claiming “she had not contractually agreed to allow the use of nudity” in it. 
  
 An attorney for the production company, Nicola Six Limited, also claims Heard attempted to “evade” being deposed in the case. 
  
 Heard alleged in a countersuit that producers used a body double to shoot “pornographic” sex scenes and add them in. 
  
 In the producers’ response to Heard’s suit, they claim, “Heard’s misconduct . . . might have resulted, at least in part, from her tumultuous relationship with Mr. Depp, which was ongoing during the filming of ‘London Fields.’ ” 
  
 And the producers believe, “The provocative nature of Heard’s femme fatale role in the film was a factor leading to her divorce from Depp.” They claim she had approved the sexy scenes but “reversed course, apparently under perceived or actual pressure from Depp (who, according to Heard, was extremely jealous).” 
  
 Depp also lashed out against Heard over her co-star in the film, Billy Bob Thornton, writing his name in blood on a mirror. The suit says, “Heard has made numerous fantastical accusations against Depp, and reports of her alleged affair with co-star [Thornton] became so pervasive that Thornton issued a public denial.” 
  
 Heard countersued producer Christopher Hanley and his wife, Roberta, alleging they used a body double for “an explicit pornographic sex scene.” 
  
 Her legal team said: “Desperate people say desperate things. The utter failure of ‘London Fields’ is due to only one reason: the producers themselves . . . Their nefarious moves included illegally adding pornographic scenes with a body double resembling Amber Heard and a striptease scene with the same body double — deceitful moves expressly barred by her contract.” 
  
 They added, “No respectable actor would promote this piece of garbage.” 
  
 Depp’s rep said: “The dispute between the producers and Amber Heard has nothing to do with Johnny Depp. We are informed that the producers have also been sued by the director and another producer. The statements about Johnny are ridiculous.” ||||| Back in 2015, the film of Martin Amis’ classic novel London Fields, starring Amber Heard as a psychic temptress who knows she is about to be murdered, was supposed to be one of the highlights of the Toronto film festival. 
  
 The film was plunged into controversy when the movie's cast and director, including Heard, refused to show up to support it, alleging that the producers had hijacked the final cut of the movie and secretly inserted sex scenes filmed with a Heard body-double, and cutting scenes with references to the 9/11 terror attacks. 
  
 Now the producers are alleging that Heard’s sex scenes were a factor in the breakdown of her relationship with Johnny Depp. 
  
 The once hotly tipped film has been mired in legal limbo without a distributor for the past year, whilst a series of claims and counterclaims have swirled around it. 
  
 Among the most headline-grabbing of the legal claims filed was that of the producers alleging that Heard sabotaged the movie by refusing to appear in sex scenes she had previously signed up for. 
  
 The producers are suing Heard for $10 million for allegedly refusing to promote the movie and “falsely” claiming “she had not contractually agreed to allow the use of nudity” in it, which they said pressured distributors not to take on the film. 
  
 Heard retaliated when she claimed in late March of this year that the case shone “a spotlight on the dark underbelly of Hollywood," and said that the producer Christopher Hanley and his wife, Roberta, were a “lascivious and sexploitive couple” who secretly filmed “body-double footage” that “included an explicit pornographic sex scene that Heard would never have agreed to do herself.” 
  
 Heard also alleged the couple kept photographs of her in “various states of undress during wardrobe changes,” and had a “prurient interest in exploiting Heard—both on and off camera.” 
  
 In response, the producers have now fired back at Heard, arguing that the alleged failure of Heard to perform the nude scenes was part and parcel of her troubled relationship with her “jealous” ex-husband Johnny Depp, who has a small role in the movie. 
  
 According to Page Six, in the producers’ fresh response to Heard’s suit, they claim, “Heard’s misconduct... might have resulted, at least in part, from her tumultuous relationship with Mr. Depp, which was ongoing during the filming of London Fields.” 
  
 The producers say, according to Page Six, that, “The provocative nature of Heard’s femme fatale role in the film was a factor leading to her divorce from Depp.” 
  
 They claim she had approved the sex scenes but “reversed course, apparently under perceived or actual pressure from Depp (who, according to Heard, was extremely jealous).” 
  
 Get The Beast In Your Inbox! Daily Digest Start and finish your day with the top stories from The Daily Beast. Cheat Sheet A speedy, smart summary of all the news you need to know (and nothing you don't). By clicking “Subscribe,” you agree to have read the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy Subscribe Thank You! You are now subscribed to the Daily Digest and Cheat Sheet. We will not share your email with anyone for any reason. 
  
 Depp reportedly was so enraged by Heard’s relationship with her co-star in the film, Billy Bob Thornton, that he sliced off the tip of his finger and wrote his name in blood on a mirror. 
  
 Thornton moved to deny the claim, telling TMZ that the cheating allegation was “completely false.” 
  
 Heard alleged that Depp was “drunk and high on ecstasy,” according to a report on TMZ at the time. 
  
 Although the injury itself reportedly happened accidentally, after Depp allegedly “smashed several bottles and windows and slammed a plastic phone against the wall,” court papers claimed Depp then took his bloody finger and dipped it in blue paint Heard had used for artworks and employed the mixture of the two liquids to write phrases such as “Starring,” “Billy Bob,” and “Easy Amber” on the wall. 
  
 The suit states “Heard has made numerous fantastical accusations against Depp, and reports of her alleged affair with co-star [Thornton] became so pervasive that Thornton issued a public denial.” 
  
 Page Six quotes Heard’s legal team as saying: “Desperate people say desperate things. The utter failure of London Fields is due to only one reason: the producers themselves... Their nefarious moves included illegally adding pornographic scenes with a body double resembling Amber Heard and a striptease scene with the same body double—deceitful moves expressly barred by her contract… No respectable actor would promote this piece of garbage.” 
  
 Depp’s rep said: “The dispute between the producers and Amber Heard has nothing to do with Johnny Depp. We are informed that the producers have also been sued by the director and another producer. The statements about Johnny are ridiculous.” 
  
 Unlike London Fields itself, this one could run and run. |||||
Student:
What caused Johnny Depp's explosive divorce from Amber Heard? According to the producers of one of Heard's movies, the film's sex scenes played a role. The producers of London Fields, as yet unreleased, are suing Heard for allegedly refusing to promote it. They say she "falsely" claimed that she never agreed to nude scenes in the film, when the truth is that she did agree—then changed her mind because she felt pressured by an "extremely jealous" Depp to do so. "The provocative nature of Heard’s femme fatale role in the film was a factor leading to her divorce from Depp," the suit claims, per Page Six. But Heard, in a countersuit, says the producers actually filmed "pornographic" sex and striptease scenes with a body double and inserted them into the movie despite Heard's contract barring sex scenes. The Daily Beast notes that the film remains unreleased because it's been "in legal limbo without a distributor for the past year" thanks to a litany of lawsuits. In 2015, the adaptation of a Martin Amis novel was supposed to be one of the big movies at the Toronto International Film Festival, but ultimately the cast and director didn't show up to support it, claiming the producers had cut certain scenes and inserted others (including the sex scenes) in the final cut. "Desperate people say desperate things. The utter failure of London Fields is due to only one reason: the producers themselves," Heard's lawyers say. "No respectable actor would promote this piece of garbage." As for Depp, his rep says the dispute has nothing to do with him and that the producers' statements about him are "ridiculous."