Teacher:In this task, you are given a text of many news articles seperated by special token "|||||". Your task is to summarize them.
Teacher: Now, understand the problem? Solve this instance: LONDON — In an abrupt shift, a London hospital said on Friday that it would reconsider its decision to turn off life support for Charlie Gard, a brain-damaged and terminally ill British infant, in light of “fresh evidence” about a potential treatment. 
  
 The statement from Great Ormond Street Hospital was the latest twist in a case that has raised difficult bioethical and legal questions, and has caught the attention of Pope Francis and President Trump. 
  
 Charlie, 11 months old, has a rare and debilitating genetic condition that has no cure, and the hospital had said that letting him die was the only humane option to end his potential pain and suffering. The hospital, where the boy has lived since October, won a series of court rulings, most recently last week, authorizing it to withdraw life support. 
  
 On Friday afternoon, however, the hospital changed course. 
  
 “Two international hospitals and their researchers have communicated to us as late as the last 24 hours that they have fresh evidence about their proposed experimental treatment,” the hospital said in the statement. “And we believe, in common with Charlie’s parents, it is right to explore this evidence.” ||||| Image copyright PA Image caption Charlie Gard has been in intensive care since October 
  
 Great Ormond Street Hospital has applied for a fresh hearing in the case of Charlie Gard following claims of "new evidence relating to potential treatment for his condition". 
  
 It comes after seven medical experts suggested unpublished data showed therapy could improve the 11-month-old's brain condition. 
  
 Previously, the High Court said it was unlikely a US doctor offering to treat Charlie would be able to cure him. 
  
 GOSH said it would "explore" the data. 
  
 Charlie's case will be heard by Mr Justice Francis on Monday at 14:00 BST, according to a High Court listing. 
  
 Image caption Under a High Court ruling, GOSH is forbidden from allowing Charlie to be transferred for nucleoside therapy anywhere 
  
 A hospital spokesman said: "Two international hospitals and their researchers have communicated to us as late as the last 24 hours that they have fresh evidence about their proposed experimental treatment. 
  
 "We believe, in common with Charlie's parents, it is right to explore this evidence. 
  
 "Great Ormond Street Hospital is giving the High Court the opportunity to objectively assess the claims of fresh evidence. 
  
 "It will be for the High Court to make its judgment on the facts. 
  
 "Our view has not changed. We believe it is right to seek the High Court's view in light of the claimed new evidence. 
  
 "Our priority has always been, and will always be, the best interests of Charlie Gard." 
  
 Under a High Court ruling, GOSH is forbidden from allowing Charlie to be transferred for nucleoside therapy anywhere. 
  
 'Tested on mice' 
  
 Seven clinicians and researchers, including the US doctor, signed a letter explaining that the treatment would be experimental for Charlie's particular condition. 
  
 They claim that "ideally" the treatment would first be tested on mice but state that, in Charlie's case, there is not time for such a trial. 
  
 Charlie has mitochondrial depletion syndrome, a rare genetic condition which affects the part of the cell responsible for energy production and respiration and has left him unable to move or breathe without a ventilator. 
  
 Image copyright PA Image caption Connie Yates and Chris Gard raised more than £1.3m for experimental treatment for Charlie 
  
 Doctors at GOSH have said he cannot see, hear, move, cry or swallow and that his life support should be switched off because there is no chance of his condition improving. 
  
 Charlie's parents, Connie Yates and Chris Gard, raised £1.3m on a crowdfunding site to pay for experimental nucleoside therapy in the US. 
  
 But they lost a legal battle with the hospital last month when judges at the European Court of Human Rights ruled further treatment would "continue to cause Charlie significant harm". 
  
 Signatories to the new letter include a neurologist and a research fellow from Rome Children's Hospital, a scientist from Cambridge University's Mitochondrial Biology Unit and two researchers from Vall d'Hebron Institut de Recerca in Barcelona. 
  
 "In light of this new information, reconsideration of treatment for Charlie Gard is respectfully advocated," the group said. ||||| 7 July 2017 GOSH statement on Charlie Gard 
  
 Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children has today applied to the High Court for a fresh hearing in the case of Charlie Gard in light of claims of new evidence relating to potential treatment for his condition. 
  
 We have just met with Charlie’s parents to inform them of this decision and will continue to keep them fully appraised of the situation. 
  
 Two international hospitals and their researchers have communicated to us as late as the last 24 hours that they have fresh evidence about their proposed experimental treatment. 
  
 And we believe, in common with Charlie’s parents, it is right to explore this evidence. 
  
 Great Ormond Street Hospital is bound by the ruling of the High Court which expressly forbids us from transferring Charlie for nucleoside therapy anywhere. 
  
 This ruling has been upheld by the Court of Appeal, the Supreme Court and the European Court of Human Rights. 
  
 It has also been supported unequivocally by some of the world’s most distinguished clinicians and scientists. 
  
 The ruling also states that it is in Charlie’s best interests for artificial ventilation to be withdrawn, and for his clinicians to provide him with palliative care only. 
  
 The ruling of Mr Justice Francis states: “It is lawful, and in Charlie’s best interests not to undergo nucleoside therapy, provided always that the measures and treatments adopted are the most compatible with maintaining Charlie’s dignity.” 
  
 Great Ormond Street Hospital is therefore giving the High Court the opportunity to objectively assess the claims of fresh evidence. 
  
 It will be for the High Court to make its judgment on the facts. 
  
 Charlie’s condition is exceptionally rare, with catastrophic and irreversible brain damage. 
  
 Our doctors have explored every medical treatment, including experimental nucleoside therapies. Independent medical experts agreed with our clinical team that this treatment would be unjustified. 
  
 Not only that, but they said it would be futile and would prolong Charlie’s suffering. This is not an issue about money or resources, but absolutely about what is right for Charlie. 
  
 Our view has not changed. We believe it is right to seek the High Court’s view in light of the claimed new evidence. 
  
 Our priority has always been, and will always be, the best interests of Charlie Gard. 
  
 But our care and compassion also goes to the loving families of each and every one of the children we look after. We strive to ensure we give them limitless support at these most difficult of times. 
  
 We will always, under all circumstances, respect the confidentiality of our patients and their families. 
  
 At Great Ormond Street Hospital, we endeavour to provide the best possible medical care for every single child we treat. 
  
 It is why we are recognised as one of the world’s leading children’s hospitals, employing the most skilled and caring doctors and nurses who are absolutely dedicated to their patients. 
  
 We are proud of our colleagues, and proud of the work that they do. 
  
 We are also immensely proud of the public support we have earned over the generations. We respect it greatly and know how precious it is. 
  
 The very last thing we want is for a patient to suffer, and our devoted medical teams do their very best day in, day out, for the children under their care. 
  
 We respectfully acknowledge the offers of help from the White House, the Vatican and our colleagues in Italy, the United States and beyond. 
  
 We would like to reassure everyone that Great Ormond Street Hospital will continue to care for Charlie and his family with the utmost respect and dignity through this very difficult time. |||||
Student:
In the latest turn in the Charlie Gard saga, a London hospital says it will not turn off life support for the brain-damaged baby as it seeks a new court opinion, the New York Times reports. The about-face came Friday after the hospital received "claims of fresh evidence" for an experimental treatment. Two international hospitals approached 11-month-old Charlie's doctors to propose a new therapy "and we believe … it is right to explore this evidence," Great Ormond Street Hospital says. Charlie's parents say an experimental treatment in the US could help the infant, who suffers from a rare genetic disorder with no cure. The London high court that approved unplugging Charlie and forbade his transfer will reconsider the case on Monday, per the BBC. The hospital's decision came even as doctors there still believe the boy has "catastrophic" brain damage and that treatment would be "futile." Great Ormond did not identify the hospitals, but one in New York City—New York Presbyterian Hospital and Columbia University Irving Medical Center—offered to treat the child after his parents' pleas went global. The Vatican and President Trump also pledged support. Charlie's parents pinned their hopes to an unidentified US neurologist who proposed trying nucleoside therapy, which helped a boy with a less severe form of the same disease. It has never been tried in someone with Charlie's form of TK2 syndrome, and even the doctor who pitched it concedes its efficacy in Charlie's case was only "theoretical" and the results unknown, per the Times. "There’s around a 10% chance of this working for Charlie," mom Connie Yates says, without citing evidence.