Instructions: In this task, you are given a text of many news articles seperated by special token "|||||". Your task is to summarize them.
Input: Courtesy of Gucci 
  
 Advertisement - Continue Reading Below 
  
 Campaign ads for Gucci's latest cruise collection have been banned in the United Kingdom, Fashionista reports, following a ruling from the country's Advertising Standards Authority (ASA). After the below video showcasing the campaign appeared on British newspaper The Times's website, the ASA received a complaint arguing that two models were "unhealthily thin": 
  
 The ASA's report notes the complaint related to two models: Madison Stubbington, pictured sitting on the couch in a yellow suit (above left), and Avery Blanchard, pictured leaning against a wall in a patterned dress (above right). 
  
 In their response, Gucci argued that "the visual parts of [the models'] bodies appeared toned and slim," but not too slim. Whether a model is "unhealthily thin" or not, they continued, is a "subjective matter." Read their argument in full below: 
  
 Advertisement - Continue Reading Below 
  
 The ads were part of a video that portrayed a dance party and was aimed at an older, sophisticated audience. They noted that the target population of The Times, where the ad appeared, had an adult and mature readership. They said it was, to some extent, a subjective issue as to whether a model looked unhealthily thin. which they considered was not the case for either of the women identified by the complainant. They believed both models had slim builds. but were not depicted in a way that could be interpreted as unhealthily thin. For example, nowhere in the ads were any models' "bones" visible, their makeup was natural rather than heavy (which might have accentuated the impression of thinness), lighting was uniform and warm to ensure there were no hollows caused by shadows and their clothes were not revealing. The visual parts of their bodies appeared toned and slim. 
  
 Regardless, the ASA eventually ruled that Blanchard did appear too skinny in the campaign — "her torso and arms were quite slender and appeared to be out of proportion with her head and lower body," their ruling read. "Further, her pose elongated her torso and accentuated her waist so that it appeared to be very small ... We also considered that her sombre facial expression and dark make up, particularly around her eyes, made her face look gaunt." Even if intended to combat problematic portrayals of the female form, it's worth noting this is a pretty body-shaming statement in itself. 
  
 Still, this decision means the campaign now can't ever appear again in the U.K. "in its current form" (though, at this point, Gucci's moved past cruise season anyway). The ASA has also charged Gucci with acting more "responsibly" going forward. 
  
 Update 4/8 4:40 p.m.: "We take our responsibilities as an advertiser very seriously in the way models are selected for, and presented in, our advertising campaigns," a Gucci spokesperson told WWD, adding that the campaign had "expired" already. "We have noted, but are not in agreement with, the assessment of the U.K. Advertising Standards Authority." 
  
 Get non-boring fashion and beauty news directly in your feed. Follow Facebook.com/CosmoBeauty. 
  
 Follow Maya on Instagram and Twitter. ||||| An ad for Gucci featuring very thin models has been banned in England. 
  
 The ad, which begins with models dancing in a villa in Florence, was flagged by the UK's Advertising Standards Authority after they received a complaint for using a model that was "unhealthily thin and gaunt." 
  
 After careful review, the authority agreed with the complainant and ordered the ad be pulled. 
  
 Most controversial ads of all time 
  
 "We considered that her torso and arms were quite slender and appeared to be out of proportion with her head and lower body," the advertising watchdog stated on their website. 
  
 "We also considered that her somber facial expression and dark makeup, particularly around her eyes, made her face look gaunt." 
  
 The UK’s Advertising Standards Authority have clamped down on questionable ads before -- notably images from Marc Jacobs’ “Oh, Lola!�? Fragrance, which the ASA likened to child pornography, and heavily photoshopped L'Oreal ads in 2011. (Guccio Gucci/ASA) 
  
 The ad for Gucci's "The Cruise 2016" campaign was featured in The Times of London in December 2015. 
  
 The Italian fashion brand defended the spot, contending that the model in question was just "toned and slim." The designer added that the tone of the ad falls in line with The Times' older, sophisticated readership profile. 
  
 "Nowhere in the ads were any models' 'bones' visible, their makeup was natural rather than heavy... and their clothes were not revealing," the fashion house argued. 
  
 DROP DEAD ADS FEATURING SKINNY MODEL IN BIKINI BANNED IN UK 
  
 However, the ASA didn't budge, deeming the spot "irresponsible." 
  
 The luxury brand has been warned that the ad must not reappear in its current form again. 
  
 "We take our responsibilities as an advertiser very seriously in the way models are selected for and presented in our advertising campaigns. We have noted, but are not in agreement with, the assessment of the UK Advertising Standards Authority, an independent regulator, in relation to one model featured in one image from our Cruise 2016 campaign. The campaign itself expired at the end of December 2015," a rep for Gucci told the Daily News. ||||| One of the images in question from Gucci's Cruise 2016 campaign. Photo: Gucci 
  
 The U.K.'s Advertising Standards Authority strikes again: Gucci is the latest luxury house to have campaign images banned by the self-regulatory organization. 
  
 The ad in question appeared on The Times's website and featured both video and still components. According to the ASA report, Gucci was taken to task for featuring two models in particular: one seated on a couch (Madison Stubbington, above), and the second leaning against a wall (Avery Blanchard, below). Both were challenged for being "unhealthily thin." 
  
 The other offending Gucci image. Photo: Gucci 
  
 Guccio Gucci SpA argued that the ads were aimed at adults, that nowhere are the models' "bones" visible, and that the natural makeup may have "accentuated the impression of thinness." The ASA agreed that "unnatural thinness" is a "subjective matter," and found the seated model to be acceptably proportional (seriously). 
  
 However, they did find that the standing model's "torso and arms were quite slender and appeared to be out of proportion with her head and lower body." They also argued that her stance made her appear even smaller, and that her makeup made her seem "gaunt." As a result, that particular image cannot appear in its current form again. 
  
 In the past, the ASA has banned ads from Miu Miu (a 2011 image featuring Hailee Steinfeld sitting on train tracks was deemed "irresponsible"), Marc Jacobs (Dakota Fanning's 2011 "Oh Lola" campaign was deemed "sexually provocative" for having the bottle between her legs), and Saint Laurent (the spring 2015 campaign model was "too thin"). Anyone can make a complaint through the ASA's website, and clearly the organization takes each one seriously, as this particular Gucci campaign received one sole complaint according the report. 
  
 Of course, one might question the use in challenging fashion campaigns at all: The one in question from Gucci was for Cruise 2016, a season no longer being advertised. It's very doubtful Gucci had any intention of using the image again anyway. 
  
 Sign up for our daily newsletter and get the latest industry news in your inbox every day. ||||| We are using cookies on our site to provide you with the best user experience. Disabling cookies may prevent our website from working efficiently. Click ok to remove this message (we will remember your choice). 
  
 Our website cookie policy has been developed to help inform you what cookies are used on this site and how to manage them. For more information visit our Cookies Policy page. 
  
 A cookie is a small file of information that is sent to your computer or mobile phone from a website so that the website can recognise your device if you return. Cookies cannot be used to identify you personally. 
  
 These pieces of information are used to improve our online services for you through, for example: 
  
 enabling our site to recognise your device so you don't have to give the same information several times during one task 
  
 recognising that you may already have given a username and password so you don't need to do it for every web page 
  
 measuring how many people are using different aspects of our online service, so we can make them easier to use and there’s enough capacity to ensure they’re fast 
  
 For information how to control and delete cookies plus complete information on our cookies uses on this site, please visit our Cookies Policy page. 
  
 Click ok to remove this message (we will remember your choice) OK |||||
Output:
If anyone has doubts that the United Kingdom's Advertising Standards Authority reads its complaint mail, this should put that to rest. Per Fashionista, a lone detractor submitted a grievance to the British ad watchdog about a Gucci ad campaign, and now it's banned in the UK—because of two "unhealthily thin" models. The brand's already expired promotion of its Cruise 2016 collection was featured in the British Times, and models Madison Stubbington and Avery Blanchard apparently took the complainant's breath away with their slim frames, spurring a challenge against the ad for being "irresponsible" and a ban on it appearing in its "current form" anywhere in the UK, per the ASA ruling. Gucci's rebuttal, via Cosmopolitan, says the ad was geared toward an "older, sophisticated audience" and that thinness is a "subjective issue." Gucci lists reasons why the models weren't portrayed as too skinny—their "bones" weren't on display, for example, nor was heavy makeup used to make their faces look too thin. "The visual parts of their bodies appeared toned and slim," the argument reads. But the ASA didn't buy that, noting after a review that Stubbington's portrayal was OK, but Blanchard's wasn't. "Her torso and arms were quite slender and appeared to be out of proportion with her head and lower body," the ruling says, adding that her pose accentuated her long torso and skinny waist and that "her somber facial expression and dark make up, particularly around her eyes, made her face look gaunt." Cosmo points out issues with the ASA's ruling: "Even if intended to combat problematic portrayals of the female form, it's worth noting this is a pretty body-shaming statement in itself." (Models in France now need a doctor's note OKing their BMI.)