You will be given a definition of a task first, then some input of the task.
In this task, you are given a text of many news articles seperated by special token "|||||". Your task is to summarize them.

Woman Who Used J&J; Products Awarded $72M 
  
 ST. LOUIS (CN) - An Alabama woman's family was awarded $72 million by a St. Louis jury Monday night on her claims that she developed ovarian cancer through the longtime use of Johnson & Johnson baby powder and other talc-based products. 
  
 Jacqueline Fox, 62, of Birmingham, Ala., died last October from the cancer. Her son took over as plaintiff after her death and jurors heard from Fox in an audio deposition recorded before her death. 
  
 Fox claimed she used the Johnson & Johnson products for feminine hygiene purposes for 35 years. Fox's lawsuit is one of many from across the country alleging that Johnson & Johnson failed to warn of a possible link between ovarian cancer and talcum powder. 
  
 A St. Louis jury deliberated for nearly five hours Monday after a three-week trial. It found Johnson & Johnson guilty of negligence, conspiracy and fraud, the St. Louis Post-Dispatch reported. 
  
 The verdict includes $10 million in actual damages and $62 million in punitive damages. 
  
 Johnson & Johnson, based in New Brunswick, N.J., is expected to appeal the verdict. 
  
 "We have no higher responsibility than the health and safety of consumers, and we are disappointed with the outcome of the trial," Carol Goodrich, a spokeswoman for Johnson & Johnson, said in an email to the Post-Dispatch on Tuesday morning. "We sympathize with the plaintiff's family but firmly believe the safety of cosmetic talc is supported by decades of scientific evidence." 
  
 Jere Beasley, Fox's lawyer, told the Post-Dispatch that his Alabama firm had heard from more than 6,000 potential clients over the years. The case ended up in St. Louis after Beasley and a Mississippi lawyer joined with a St. Louis firm representing several women who also have ovarian cancer. 
  
 Fox was the first of the plaintiffs whose case went to trial, according to the Post-Dispatch. ||||| Close Get email notifications on Kim Bell daily! 
  
 Your notification has been saved. 
  
 There was a problem saving your notification. 
  
 Whenever Kim Bell posts new content, you'll get an email delivered to your inbox with a link. 
  
 Email notifications are only sent once a day, and only if there are new matching items. ||||| (Reuters) - Johnson & Johnson (JNJ.N) was ordered by a Missouri state jury to pay $72 million of damages to the family of a woman whose death from ovarian cancer was linked to her use of the company’s talc-based Baby Powder and Shower to Shower for several decades. 
  
 In a verdict announced late Monday night, jurors in the circuit court of St. Louis awarded the family of Jacqueline Fox $10 million of actual damages and $62 million of punitive damages, according to the family’s lawyers and court records. 
  
 The verdict is the first by a U.S. jury to award damages over the claims, the lawyers said. 
  
 More from Reuters 
  
 * Social media users concerned over J&J talc powder after verdict 
  
 * Behind the refugee crisis, families in the West willing to pay and pay 
  
 * Solid support for Apple in iPhone encryption fight: poll 
  
 Bottles of Johnson & Johnson baby powder line a drugstore shelf in New York October 15, 2015. REUTERS/Lucas Jackson 
  
 Johnson & Johnson faces claims that it, in an effort to boost sales, failed for decades to warn consumers that its talc-based products could cause cancer. About 1,000 cases have been filed in Missouri state court, and another 200 in New Jersey. 
  
 Fox, who lived in Birmingham, Alabama, claimed she used Baby Powder and Shower to Shower for feminine hygiene for more than 35 years before being diagnosed three years ago with ovarian cancer. She died in October at age 62. 
  
 Jurors found Johnson & Johnson liable for fraud, negligence and conspiracy, the family’s lawyers said. Deliberations lasted four hours, following a three-week trial. 
  
 Jere Beasley, a lawyer for Fox’s family, said Johnson & Johnson “knew as far back as the 1980s of the risk,” and yet resorted to “lying to the public, lying to the regulatory agencies.” He spoke on a conference call with journalists. 
  
 Carol Goodrich, a Johnson & Johnson spokeswoman, said: “We have no higher responsibility than the health and safety of consumers, and we are disappointed with the outcome of the trial. We sympathize with the plaintiff’s family but firmly believe the safety of cosmetic talc is supported by decades of scientific evidence.” 
  
 Trials in several other talc lawsuits have been set for later this year, according to Danielle Mason, who also represented Fox’s family at trial. 
  
 In October 2013, a federal jury in Sioux Falls, South Dakota found that plaintiff Deane Berg’s use of Johnson & Johnson’s body powder products was a factor in her developing ovarian cancer. Nevertheless, it awarded no damages, court records show. 
  
 Valeant Pharmaceuticals International Inc VRX.TO now owns the Shower to Shower brand but was not a defendant in the Fox case. 
  
 The case is Hogans et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al, Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, Missouri, No. 1422-CC09012. |||||
Output:
It's a huge blow for Johnson & Johnson, and a huge win for the family of a woman who blamed the company's products for her ovarian cancer. In St. Louis on Monday, a jury awarded $72 million to the family of Alabama's Jacqueline Fox: $10 million in actual damages and $62 million—$1 million for every year that she lived—in punitive damages, Courthouse News reports. Fox, who died in October but testified in a video deposition, said she used the company's talc-based Baby Powder and Shower to Shower products for feminine hygiene for 35 years. The family's lawyers said the company covered up evidence the products could cause cancer and the jury agreed, finding Johnson & Johnson liable for fraud, negligence, and conspiracy, reports Reuters. The evidence included internal memos that lawyers argued showed that Johnson & Johnson was aware of the link between talc and ovarian cancer for more than 30 years but covered it up. Fox's son, Marvin Salter, became the plaintiff after her death. He tells the St. Louis Post-Dispatch that Johnson & Johnson was a company name he had trusted. "My reaction was disbelief," he says. "How can a company have known about this relationship between talc and ovarian cancer since the 1970s and not disclosed it?" Fox's case was the first to go to court, but there are around 1,200 similar ones in Missouri and New Jersey. The company says "the safety of cosmetic talc is supported by decades of scientific evidence" and it plans to appeal the ruling. (Another alleged cancer risk: This laminate flooring from China.)