Problem: Orhan Pamuk, a prominent, post-modern writer whose work is translated into more than 40 languages, received the 2006 Nobel Prize in Literature. Pamuk was an admired writer in Turkey until the events in 2005, when lawyers of two Turkish professional associations brought criminal charges against him for "insulting Turkishness" after the author's controversial statements regarding the disputed Armenian Genocide of 1915-1917. He claimed, and repeated his claim, that  ... one million Armenians and 30,000 Kurds were killed in Turkey.

Based on the paragraph above can we conclude that "Armenians and Kurds were the only ones affected by this genocide."? OPTIONS:
- Yes
- It's impossible to say
- No

A: It's impossible to say


Q: the person discussed is guilty of a crime
Koerber admitted on the witness stand he did at times take money from new investors to pay interest to previous investors to make the enterprise seem profitable. But he said the money was backed completely by equity in real estate and asserted that meant he was using the equity to pay interest.
OPTIONS:
- Yes
- It's impossible to say
- No
A: It's impossible to say


In 1955, the Aurora Borealis, a coating applied to crystal stones to produce a "rainbow of colors" effect was introduced.
Aurora Borealis crystals are produced for the rich. OPTIONS:
- Yes
- It's impossible to say
- No
A: It's impossible to say


input hypothesis: An overhand serve will require a player stance that is the opposite of the underhand serve. 
Context: How to do an underhand serve<br>Get your feet into position. Stand with your non-dominant foot in front with your toes facing forward. Your dominant foot should be in the back with toes pointed slightly out.
OPTIONS:
- Yes
- It's impossible to say
- No
true or false: It's impossible to say


Context:
India, an enchanting country situated in the southern central peninsula of the Asian continent, covers over 3.28 million square kilometers.
Hypothesis: India covers a large part of the Asian Continent  OPTIONS:
- Yes
- It's impossible to say
- No
Yes


Problem: The traditionally teen-friendly app now counts 14% of smartphone users who are 35 or older as users, as compared to 67.5% of users ages 18 to 24. It remains to be seen whether the arrival of older users will be a turnoff for Snapchat’s core audience.

Based on the paragraph above can we conclude that "No users are between the ages of 18 and 24."? OPTIONS:
- Yes
- It's impossible to say
- No

A:
No