In this task, you are given a text of many news articles seperated by special token "|||||". Your task is to summarize them.
Q: Just One More Thing... 
  
 We have sent you a verification email. Please check your email and click on the link to activate your profile. 
  
 If you do not receive the verification message within a few minutes of signing up, please check your Spam or Junk folder. 
  
 Close ||||| Page 1 of 1 
  
 Talking dirty to minors, just like Miley Cyrus "twerking" on MTV or Janet Jackson having a "wardrobe malfunction" during prime time, is constitutionally protected free speech, the highest criminal court in Texas ruled Wednesday. 
  
 The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals struck down a section of a 2005 law that banned adults from sexually explicit online communication with children. 
  
 That means soliciting a person under the age of 17 for sex remains illegal, but talking dirty with a child is protected by the U.S. Constitution. 
  
 Judge Cathy Cochran, who penned the ruling, said the law "may protect children from suspected sexual predators before they ever express any intent to commit illegal sexual acts, but it prohibits the dissemination of a vast array of constitutionally protected speech and materials." 
  
 The opinion centered on a Harris County case in which a 53-year-old man was accused of sending sexually explicit text messages to a teenager with an intent to arouse or gratify his sexual desire. 
  
 "It's unclear whether the messages are serious or whether he was joking around," said attorney Grant Scheiner, who represented the man. "Nevertheless, he got charged with a crime." 
  
 Because the court tossed out the law, the charges against the man have been dismissed. 
  
 The court's ruling said the 2005 law makes illegal a "whole cornucopia of titillating talk or dirty talk" but would also outlaw online discussions of other sexually explicit content including famous works like "Lolita" "50 Shades of Grey" "Lady Chatterly's Lover" and Shakespeare's "Troilus and Cressida." 
  
 It's parents' job 
  
 Mark Bennett, the attorney who argued the case at the appellate level, applauded the court's decision. 
  
 "The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals has protected free speech in the face of a challenge to free speech by the government," Bennett said. 
  
 Speaking about the impact of the ruling, Bennett said parents, not the government, should be policing who is talking to their children and what is being said. 
  
 "Parents have the job of dealing with this. This is not the government's job," he said. "Keep track of who your kids are communicating with and teach your kids what's appropriate and what's not." 
  
 In Wednesday's ruling, the court noted that online solicitation and other inappropriate behavior with children is already outlawed by other statutes. 
  
 The Texas Legislature passed the law to criminalize using the internet or electronic messages, including texts, to "lure" children into sexual situations. 
  
 Measure too broad 
  
 The opinion noted the law was so broad it could make it illegal to send messages, links or images about anything "sexually explicit" including television shows, movies and performances, which encompasses Jackson's 2004 Super Bowl show and Cyrus's dancing during the 2013 MTV Video Music Awards. 
  
 "Sexual expression which is indecent but not obscene is protected by the First Amendment," the opinion said. 
  
 Prosecutors were disappointed with the decision and said they are considering appealing to the U.S. Supreme Court. 
  
 "It's been a really valuable tool to help us capture folks who prey on children," said Alan Curry, chief of the Harris County District Attorney's appellate division. "We've been able to pull some really dangerous people off the street because of it." 
  
 Curry said pending cases would likely be dismissed and the office will have to review what to do about anyone convicted under the voided law. |||||
A: 
A Texas court has ruled that it's legal for adults to talk dirty to minors—as long as they don't solicit sex, reports the Austin American-Statesman. The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals struck down part of a 2005 law that made it illegal to engage in sexually explicit talk online with kids. The judges decided that the law was too broadly written, reports the Houston Chronicle. It "may protect children from suspected sexual predators before they ever express any intent to commit illegal sexual acts, but it prohibits the dissemination of a vast array of constitutionally protected speech and materials," said the opinion. For example, it could be interpreted to outlaw discussions of everything from 50 Shades of Grey and Lolita to Janet Jackson's wardrobe malfunction and Miley Cyrus' twerking, said the judges, who added that existing laws already protect kids from predators. The case centered around a 53-year-old man accused of sending dirty texts to a teenager, charges that have now been dismissed. "Parents have the job of dealing with this," says his lawyer. "This is not the government's job." Prosecutors—who argued that “perverts will be free to bombard our children with salacious emails and text messages"—are considering a Supreme Court appeal.