Teacher:In this task, you are given a text of many news articles seperated by special token "|||||". Your task is to summarize them.
Teacher: Now, understand the problem? Solve this instance: "Jet fuel can't melt steel beams" is one of the most widely known arguments that 9/11 was an inside job. It's also one of the dumbest. This metalworker at purgatoryironworks was getting sick of hearing it, so he put together this little video to illustrate exactly how flawed that logic is: 
  
 Advertisement - Continue Reading Below 
  
 Of course while his point that steel beams don't need to literally melt in order to lose their integrity is solid and seeing it first-hand is neat, his process has a flaw: He openly admits that the forge he was using heated the steel beam several hundred degrees above the temperature at which jet fuel burns. That, and he doesn't say how long the beam has been in the forge, or offer any evidence of the forge's actual temperature. His little experiment here is more party trick than perfect simulation. 
  
 Fortunately none of that matters given that the boneheaded theories about 9/11 have already been thoroughly debunked in much greater detail by a whole host of sources, including this very publication. But at least we have the truthers to thank for a very nifty meme. 
  
 H/t Digg ||||| Published on Dec 15, 2015 
  
 Why don't these dumb things die? 
  
 "For any licensing requests please contact licensing@break.com” 
  
 Subscribe For More Blacksmithing Goodness and follow us on Facebook at "Purgatory Ironworks"! ||||| Tenacious 9/11 truthers have many conspiracies about why the collapse of the World Trade Center towers was not as it seemed. Some claim it was an inside job by the U.S. government, and some believe it's all related to the movie Pitch Perfect. 
  
 There is one conspiracy, however, that tops them all: that burning jet fuel would not be hot enough to melt the buildings' steel beams. 
  
 Until, perhaps, now. 
  
 Georgia blacksmith Trenton Tye is tired of that argument, so he made a video to show exactly why the "steel beams" theory is totally bunk. 
  
 Now, you might think that Tye can get back to doing whatever he has to do during his busy day and not have to worry about the so-called idiotic argument that apparently burns him to no end. Wrong. 
  
 The YouTube video, which racked up millions of views in a single day, has only emboldened the truthers, who have stayed true to form and picked apart every hole they can find in Tye's video. As one highly-rated comment puts it: 
  
 1) Why did you heat it beyond 1500 to 1800 degrees, 300 more than jet fuel? 
  
 2) How long did you heat that small bar to get it to 1800 degree, and how long were the WTC thick beams exposed to heat, and did they get to 1800 degrees? 
  
 3) how many WTC beams reached temps of 1800 to soften to the point of failure, and were there enough soften beams to cause the collapse? How widespread were the WTC fires. 
  
 4) Most importantly, why don't all high rise steel framed building fires result in collapse. WTC were the first to collapse from fire. 
  
  
  
 Obviously your experiment is overly simplistic and ignores numerous factors. 
  
 Hey, at least he tried. 
  
 Screengrab via Purgatory Ironworks/YouTube |||||
Student:
A Georgia metal worker has set out to disprove the belief that jet fuel doesn’t burn hot enough to melt steel beams—like those in the World Trade Center towers—a major contention of conspiracy theorists who insist that 9/11 was an inside job. "I am so sick and tired of this argument," Trenton Tye says in his YouTube video. First, Tye demonstrates the strength of a half-inch thick structural steel beam by using it to lift an anvil. Then he takes another piece of steel he says has been heated to 1,800 degrees and shows how it has become bendable, like "a freaking noodle." In closing, Tye declares: "Your argument is invalid. Get over it. Find a job." While it does show that steel beams don't need to melt to lose their integrity, Tye's demonstration—"more party trick than perfect simulation"—does a have a few flaws, Popular Mechanics points out: The steel beam he used is heated to 1,800 degrees, 300 degrees hotter than jet fuel burns. Tye doesn't say for how long the beam was heated. He doesn't provide evidence of his forge's temperature. Those flaws, the Daily Dot notes, have already been seized upon by so-called 9/11 truthers in comments on the video, which has been viewed more than 6.5 million times, seeking to debunk Tye's debunking. But "hey, at least he tried," concludes the post. ("Truthers" won't let go of the Sandy Hook shooting, either.)