Context:
Parks Canada announced that surf conditions in P.E.I. National Park are currently considered dangerous and visitors are asked not to enter the water, according to a news release. "Rip currents may be formed along the shores due to high winds and resulting surf conditions," reads the release. "To ensure visitor safety, entering the water is not recommended in these conditions and visitors are asked to follow surf guard instructions."
Hypothesis: There was no threat of rip currents. OPTIONS:
- Yes
- It's impossible to say
- No
No


Input: OPTIONS:
- Yes
- It's impossible to say
- No

Yes, and what -- but the definition of the term was a responsibility vested in Congress, because it has the power -- the legislative history of the 1998 act itself suggests what was going on here and suggests why the Framers gave this authority to Congress. There were numerous hearings, there were testimony by the folks that represent the same position as petitioners here as to why this shouldn't be done, why it should be that this done. Congress weighed -- as this Court, the phrase Court used, I think it was in the Feist case,the delicate balance that was so difficult for Congress to--

Sentence: The 1998 act was drafted prior to the release of the Feist case. 

Output: It's impossible to say


Problem:
Read the following paragraph and determine if the hypothesis is true:

Pole<br>The man drove into a pole. He told the cops he hadn't seen it. The cops gave him a sobriety test. The man did not pass it. The man got a ticket.

OPTIONS:
- Yes
- It's impossible to say
- No
Hypothesis: The man didn't drive into anything.
****
Answer:
No


[Q]: Starting today, the government must follow the example set by one of its own backbenchers, the member for Thunder Bay-Atitokan, who wrote in The Chronicle Journal as recently as March 29 that the government was again going to meet with public service employee representatives on the issue of pension fund surpluses in order to come up with an agreement acceptable to both parties. Starting next week, the government must follow the example set by one of its own. OPTIONS:
- Yes
- It's impossible to say
- No
[A]: No


Problem: The substances that our company uses do not leave stains, do not have an unpleasant smell and are not toxic.

Based on the paragraph above can we conclude that "All substances are used by our company."? OPTIONS:
- Yes
- It's impossible to say
- No

A: It's impossible to say


Context:
Mark's dog returns<br>Mark had lost his dog over a month ago. He missed his dog very much. One evening while mowing the lawn he notices something. He sees a dog in the street that looked like his lost dog. It turns out to be his lost dog who had returned home.
Hypothesis: He saw a dog on the street looking like his goat OPTIONS:
- Yes
- It's impossible to say
- No

No