We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

Input: Consider Input: it has been proven time and again prisons don't rehabilitate, keeping someone in prision for their entire life in prision is less human than the death penalty.

Output: Valid


Input: Consider Input: Any parent who "beats the shit" out of their kid, is too far gone to wonder why the kid is violent.

Output: Invalid


Input: Consider Input: Lastly, the death penalty is the ultimate scapegoat because it is letting the criminal off the hook without allowing them to think what they did as truly wrong.


Output: Valid


