instruction:
The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the self-need strategy, otherwise output No. self-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used to create a personal need for an item in the negotiation, such as by pointing out that the participant sweats a lot to show preference towards water packages.
question:
Context: 'I would propose that I get 1 water, 1 food and 3 firewood and you would get 2 water and 2 food' 'I don't mind the division but I would like a pack of firewood added because my family of 7 consume this item as well during the day & night' 'you would have to give more items up to get firewood. if you get more water, which is our highest item, i need more of other items'
Utterance: 'How about 1 water, 2 food and 2 firewood?'
answer:
No


question:
Context: 'for me. 2 pack of water 2 pack of fire wood and 2 pack of food. ' 'I gotta have one extra of the food or wood at least if you want two water' 'i already reduce my package in water. now what can i do? in my group my wife is cansive and one kid and a old man he is sicked person. so i need this package friend. please friend'
Utterance: 'well. I may be willing to give you two water but i need to have two firewood to boil up some of this lake water to try to drink'
answer:
Yes


question:
Context: 'Yeah, I think I'm okay with firewood, but I'd really like more food and water.' 'That fine then. If you want you can have most of the water and I can have most of the firewood. Sounds good?' 'That seems fine. How do you want to split the food? I grew up poor so I'm always afraid of starving 😮'
Utterance: 'Oh, yea I get that. I have a family so I need some food too. But just to clarify, are the original plan was to get 3 firewood for me and 3 waters for u right? '
answer:

No


