We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.
--------
Question: I think the deterent benefit of capitol punishment is far too valuable to throw away for rare instances of innocents being executed.

Answer: Valid


Question: To take an example: the tax-code contains numerous loopholes that allow unscrupulous folks to take advantage of it and keep money that many argue they should be paying into the system.

Answer: Invalid


Question: It's very dangerous precedent to suggest that in cases where there's only one witness/victim that a conviction isn't fair, just, or whatever choice of wording one might use.

Answer:
Invalid


