We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

Ex Input:
The death penalty is much more expensive than life without parole because...blah.blah.blah...*

Ex Output:
Valid


Ex Input:
There is more evidence in the "belief" of a human spirit than has ever been provided in opposition to the possibility.

Ex Output:
Invalid


Ex Input:
Dsa posted some figures on the old forum saying that less people end up dying if the death penalty is kept in place.

Ex Output:

Valid


