The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the self-need strategy, otherwise output No. self-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used to create a personal need for an item in the negotiation, such as by pointing out that the participant sweats a lot to show preference towards water packages.

Context: 'Interesting.  If I decided to forgo water completely, would you accept giving me everything else?' 'no, at the most i can do is i get 2 water, 2 food and 0 firewood or I get 1 water, 3 food and 1 firewood' 'But you get everything you wanted. You said you needed 3 water, I offered it to you.'
Utterance: 'but i can't give you 3 food and 3 firewood, thats 6 items vs the 3 water'
No

Context: 'so If I understand correctly, the Deal is I get 3 Food and 2 Water: While you get 3 Firewood and 1 Water?' 'I was just negotiating the water for now.  I was trying to do one at a time.' 'ah, I'm definitely ok with doing one at a time: A 2:1 split is definitely OK with me: The issue is, if we consider each individually, it might be harder to come to a deal, but I'm happy to do it your way.'
Utterance: 'How about you take 1 firewood, I''l take 2 and with food, you can have 2 and I'll take one package.  I have two very hungry boys!'
No

Context: 'Hi, I'm hoping we can come to a nice deal. 🙂 I'm most interested in firewood, because it always helps to have extra if your fire goes out.'
Utterance: 'That makes sense. I'm also interested in firewood, but have a great need for water due to the current weather. '

Yes

