We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

[EX Q]: Morally, I do not believe in eye for an eye, because it would leave the whole world blind.
[EX A]: Valid

[EX Q]: When the criminal is in a well controlled prison, self-defense is no longer relevant - he is not capable of harming anyone.
[EX A]: Valid

[EX Q]: The fact that you believe a person should be executed for kicking a dog demonstrates that you are one f those unhinged vigliante sorts; your sort should be chlorinated from the gene pool before you become a serial killer.
[EX A]:
Valid

