We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

[EX Q]: Numbers 35 I�۪m sorry, I read all of Numbers 35, and was unable to find anything to do with ���striking someone and receiving the death penalty.�۝
[EX A]: Valid

[EX Q]: But they do have a law forcing post-conviction DNA testing.
[EX A]: Valid

[EX Q]: Kirk Bloodsworth was convicted in March of 1985 for the brutal killing and sexual assault of a nine year old girl.
[EX A]:
Valid

