TASK DEFINITION: We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.
PROBLEM: Very true, yet as the debate asks, should it be outlawed, I support no because it has it's benefits if fixed.

SOLUTION: Valid

PROBLEM: People who commit bad crimes shouldn't be allowed to suffer in prison for the rest of their life.

SOLUTION: Valid

PROBLEM: Now as far as Scott Peterson goes if it was me I would fry him after 2 years of appeals because even though they only have circumstantial evidence against him it is overwhelming......

SOLUTION:
Valid

