We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.
--------
Question: Why should people who have been convicted be aable to appeal over and over untill he can no longer afford to appeal.

Answer: Valid


Question: Haha, yeah I am agnostic, but it was a little joke I made ;)

Answer: Invalid


Question: A significent amount of death row inmates have been exonerated on finding of incompetent/drunk/high lawyers, racial prejudice, hidden or recent evidence, and other such non-court violations.

Answer:
Valid


