We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

[EX Q]: If both acheive the same goal of keeping society away from harm, then why go overboard in reducing the criminals rights by killing him?
[EX A]: Valid

[EX Q]: The death sentence has been used since the beginning of the United States, and rarely, if ever, has there been an occurrence in which someone avenges the death of a murderer or rapist.
[EX A]: Valid

[EX Q]: Second, if the situation were turned, you would probably say "Purposely indulging in an act that carries risk to your own body for your own convenience and then committing suicide" if we were talking about peds.
[EX A]:
Invalid

