The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the self-need strategy, otherwise output No. self-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used to create a personal need for an item in the negotiation, such as by pointing out that the participant sweats a lot to show preference towards water packages.
One example: Context: 'That sounds pretty reasonable as I am in need of firewood the most. Would it be most reasonable to each take what we need most and split the water down the middle?' 'Yes, it would.' 'I think that sounds fair. The problem is that there are 3 waters and one of us would get two and the other one. How should we sort that?'
Utterance: 'You can take the two water. I am not that thirsty most days.'
Solution is here: No
Explanation: In this utterance, the participant does not use self-need since they do not talk about any need for themselves.

Now, solve this: Context: 'That does sound bad. I am going camping and my kids might want to stay up late so I will need extra firewood for this to keep light and more warmth. I will take all 3 extra of the food and the water but I need 2 firewood also.' 'no that won't work.  I will give you 3 food and 1 water.  I will take 3 wood and 2 waters.' 'I did not know you wanted water. Ok, that's great so I will take all 3 extra packages of food.As for the water I would like 2 waters because my dog is coming along with us for our trip and extra water for him will be needed.'
Utterance: 'i think i should have 2 waters because i will need to put the fire out to protect the forest.'
Solution:
Yes