We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

Example Input: To me, the system's job is one thing: To prevent a similar crime from happening again, not to fulfill a concept that we have invented.
Example Output: Valid

Example Input: So what does he have to do with a debate like this about murderers and the death penalty?
Example Output: Valid

Example Input: As Dieter and other death penalty opponents make no distinction between the actually innocent and the legally innocent, why don't they claim that over 2500 innocents have been "exonerated" from death row?
Example Output:
Valid

