Given a premise, an initial context, an original ending, and a counterfactual context, the task is to generate a new story ending aligned with the counterfactual context and as close to the original ending as possible. Each instance consists of a five-sentence story. The premise is the first sentence of a story, and the second sentence, which is the initial context, provides more information about the story's context and the story's general plot. The original ending is the last three sentences of the story. Also, a counterfactual context is a slight modification to the initial context. You should write a new story ending that edits the original story ending as little as possible to regain coherence with the counterfactual context. To sum up, you should write the last three sentences of a story based on the premise(first sentence) and the counterfactual context(second sentence) of the story.

Ex Input:
Premise: Constance travelled to Italy to be with her lover Francisco. 
 Initial Context: When she arrived, Francisco was acting sheepish. 
 Original Ending: She checked his phone and saw he had been texting another girl. Constance cried on the plane back home. Once back in the US, she deleted all trace of Francisco. 
 Counterfactual Context: Constance was so excited to finally be with Francisco.

Ex Output:
She checked his phone and saw he had been texting another girl. Constance cried on the plane back home. Once back in the US, she deleted all trace of Francisco. 


Ex Input:
Premise: Pete was hungry. 
 Initial Context: He looked in the kitchen for something to eat. 
 Original Ending: All he could find were crackers. After a while, he found a jar of peanut butter. He enjoyed his small, tasty snack. 
 Counterfactual Context: He looked in the grocery store for something to eat.

Ex Output:
There were so many options at the store. After a while, he settled on a jar of peanut butter and crackers. He enjoyed his small, tasty snack. 


Ex Input:
Premise: The ornithologist picked up the dead bird delicately. 
 Initial Context: Clipped to one of its toes was a note. 
 Original Ending: He shuddered with anticipation at the confirmation of the conspiracy. Reading the note, he discarded it with a dismissive toss. From then on, he violated the pigeonhole principle by sheer will. 
 Counterfactual Context: He saw the bird's toes were broken.

Ex Output:

He shuddered with anticipation at the confirmation of the injury. Examining the bird, he discarded it with a dismissive toss. From then on, he violated the pigeonhole principle by sheer will. 


