We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

[EX Q]: After all, absence of brain activity is considered legally dead in the medical field, so the start of brain activity should be the requirement for them to be legally alive.
[EX A]: Invalid

[EX Q]: Getting rid of the expensive appeals basically ensures that more innocent people will die.
[EX A]: Valid

[EX Q]: If someone is bad enough to be considered for the death penalty then they must have had sure evidence that they are guilty if they are then they shouldn't deserve the right to live among people they could kill
[EX A]:
Valid

