We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

Example Input: When the point that someone on death row was saved by DNA is brought up, it shows that system works because it has saved their life.
Example Output: Valid

Example Input: Elections aren't supposed to be proof beyond reasonable doubt that the person on suited to the job, just the opinion of the electors.
Example Output: Invalid

Example Input: The death penalty is also based on rationality of murder.
Example Output:
Valid

