We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

[Q]: The reason why I'm for death penalty is because some people can be so dangerous fir the society, like serial murderer or maniac, so that they must be punished by this method.
[A]: Valid


[Q]: But people who act in the heat of a moment, who don̢���t predetermine to take lives or do harm, they are at least excused from the death penalty for not having put rational thought into the matter.
[A]: Valid


[Q]: The first part of that definition is for the most part inconsequential to this argument.
[A]:
Invalid


