We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

Example Input: It preserves the society from other attacks, we do not need to play GOD
Example Output: Valid

Example Input: Peterson could face the death penalty or life without parole.
Example Output: Valid

Example Input: As for the OP I have already commented on it by disagreeing with your suggestions (from which you now seem to be shying away).
Example Output:
Invalid

