We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

Input: Consider Input: For the very worst offenders who are uncontroleable, there are options such as solitary confinement, etc.

Output: Valid


Input: Consider Input: If the death penalty were simply abolished, there would be no endless chain of appeals and therefore cost would decrease.

Output: Valid


Input: Consider Input: If revenge is comparable to justice, doesn't it make more sense (at least in economic terms) to allow communities to kill the people who've committed murder in any way they choose?


Output: Valid


