Question: Let's complete this passage.
A 29-year-old computer technician for a U.S. defense contractor leaked details of a top-secret American program that collects vast streams of phone and Internet data, American and British newspapers revealed Sunday. "My sole motive is to inform the public as to that which is done in their name and that which is done against them," the source, Edward Snowden, told Britain's the Guardian, one of the papers that broke stories on the program last week. The Washington Post also disclosed Sunday that Snowden was the source on its stories. Snowden is a former technical assistant for the CIA and has been working at the National Security Agency, the U.S. electronic intelligence service, for the past four years, the newspaper reported. He said he walked away from a six-figure job in Hawaii for the computer consulting firm Booz Allen Hamilton and has holed up in a hotel in Hong Kong in preparation for the expected fallout from his disclosures.

A law enforcement official told CNN the

OPTIONS:
- American must charge Snowden before a process to seek his extradition can begin, adding that any talk of such action is "jumping ahead" of where things stand in the case.
- Booz Allen Hamilton must charge Snowden before a process to seek his extradition can begin, adding that any talk of such action is "jumping ahead" of where things stand in the case.
- Britain must charge Snowden before a process to seek his extradition can begin, adding that any talk of such action is "jumping ahead" of where things stand in the case.
- British must charge Snowden before a process to seek his extradition can begin, adding that any talk of such action is "jumping ahead" of where things stand in the case.
- CIA must charge Snowden before a process to seek his extradition can begin, adding that any talk of such action is "jumping ahead" of where things stand in the case.
- Congress must charge Snowden before a process to seek his extradition can begin, adding that any talk of such action is "jumping ahead" of where things stand in the case.
- Dianne Feinstein must charge Snowden before a process to seek his extradition can begin, adding that any talk of such action is "jumping ahead" of where things stand in the case.
- Edward Snowden must charge Snowden before a process to seek his extradition can begin, adding that any talk of such action is "jumping ahead" of where things stand in the case.
- Guardian must charge Snowden before a process to seek his extradition can begin, adding that any talk of such action is "jumping ahead" of where things stand in the case.
- Hawaii must charge Snowden before a process to seek his extradition can begin, adding that any talk of such action is "jumping ahead" of where things stand in the case.
- Hong Kong must charge Snowden before a process to seek his extradition can begin, adding that any talk of such action is "jumping ahead" of where things stand in the case.
- Internet must charge Snowden before a process to seek his extradition can begin, adding that any talk of such action is "jumping ahead" of where things stand in the case.
- National Security Agency must charge Snowden before a process to seek his extradition can begin, adding that any talk of such action is "jumping ahead" of where things stand in the case.
- Snowden must charge Snowden before a process to seek his extradition can begin, adding that any talk of such action is "jumping ahead" of where things stand in the case.
- U.S. must charge Snowden before a process to seek his extradition can begin, adding that any talk of such action is "jumping ahead" of where things stand in the case.
- Washington Post must charge Snowden before a process to seek his extradition can begin, adding that any talk of such action is "jumping ahead" of where things stand in the case.
Answer: American must charge Snowden before a process to seek his extradition can begin, adding that any talk of such action is "jumping ahead" of where things stand in the case.

QUES: A COMPLETION PROBLEM. 

(CNN) -- Three attacks were made on Royal Dutch Shell oil facilities in Nigeria on Sunday, according to a company spokesman who said details were not immediately available. Investigating the attacks will be difficult because they happened in remote areas, Royal Dutch Shell says. The attacks were against pipelines in the eastern part of the Niger Delta in Nigeria, said the spokesman, Rainer Winzenried. "Shell is investigating the impact on facilities, the environment and the production capabilities," he said. The attacks happened in remote areas, making investigations difficult, he said, adding that the company would not send in investigators until it was certain the area was secure. It was not known whether there were any casualties, he said.

At that time,

OPTIONS:
- CNN destroyed several oil facilities, forcing Nigeria to cut its oil exports by as many as 1 million barrels of oil per day, or 40 percent.
- MEND destroyed several oil facilities, forcing Nigeria to cut its oil exports by as many as 1 million barrels of oil per day, or 40 percent.
- Niger Delta destroyed several oil facilities, forcing Nigeria to cut its oil exports by as many as 1 million barrels of oil per day, or 40 percent.
- Nigeria destroyed several oil facilities, forcing Nigeria to cut its oil exports by as many as 1 million barrels of oil per day, or 40 percent.
- Rainer Winzenried destroyed several oil facilities, forcing Nigeria to cut its oil exports by as many as 1 million barrels of oil per day, or 40 percent.
- Royal Dutch Shell destroyed several oil facilities, forcing Nigeria to cut its oil exports by as many as 1 million barrels of oil per day, or 40 percent.
- Shell destroyed several oil facilities, forcing Nigeria to cut its oil exports by as many as 1 million barrels of oil per day, or 40 percent.

ANS:
MEND destroyed several oil facilities, forcing Nigeria to cut its oil exports by as many as 1 million barrels of oil per day, or 40 percent.