In this task, you are given an article. Your task is to summarize the article in a sentence.

Ex Input:
The Public Accounts Committee (PAC) said the £130m settlement "seems disproportionately small", compared with the size of its UK business.
The PAC questioned Google's European head, Matt Brittin, earlier this month.
The internet giant insisted that it paid a "fair" amount of tax following an outcry to the settlement last month.
At the time of the deal, the Chancellor described the agreement as a "great success".
The committee said it was not possible to judge whether the agreement had been fair to taxpayers, because of the lack of transparency over details of the settlement and how it was reached.
The PAC chair, Meg Hillier, MP said public anger at the agreement to cover taxes due over the past 10 years had been "palpable".
"Whether you call it secrecy or confidentiality, this lack of transparency does nothing to build confidence that big corporations are paying their fair share of tax," she added.
In its report the committee was concerned the taxman "appears to have settled for less" corporation tax from Google than other countries are willing to accept.
It called for HMRC to reopen the deal if new evidence became available as a result of investigations by other European authorities.
Earlier this month, French Finance Minister Michel Sapin ruled out striking a deal with the US company.
In its recommendations to government, the committee called on HMRC "to lead the way in pressing for changes to international tax rules to prevent aggressive avoidance by multinational companies."
MPs said the taxman seemed unable to collect "a fair share" of corporation tax from global companies in the UK because international rules were not working.
The committee said: "Google's stated desire for greater tax simplicity and transparency is at odds with the complex operational structure it has created."
MPs added that Google did not pay a penalty as part of its settlement and complex rules made it easier for large businesses to avoid being fined than the average taxpayer.
The UK is Google's second largest market after the US, contributing around 10% of Google's worldwide revenue.
A spokesperson for HMRC said in a statement: "HMRC does not settle for a penny less than is due under the law from multinationals. Last year we brought in an additional £7bn by rigorously enforcing the tax rules that apply to large businesses.
"We completely understand that there is a real appetite for as much information and insight as possible into how we pursue the tax payable by multinationals.
"We are committed to being as open and transparent as we can within the constraints of our statutory duty of taxpayer confidentiality."
There has been no response so far from Google to Wednesday's report.

Ex Output:
An influential group of MPs has criticised an agreement between Google and the tax authority over how much the company has to pay in back taxes.


Ex Input:
The footpath to Durdle Door on the Jurassic Coast was damaged in a series of winter storms.
Work to rebuild the steps was carried out amid a row between Natural England and owners the Lulworth Estate over who was responsible for maintaining them.
Repairs were funded from car parking charges at the Door and Lulworth Cove.
James Weld, from the estate, said the beach is the most visited part of the Jurassic Coast.
He said it was important for people to be able to get up close to the Door, which had only been accessible via a steep clay path since January 2013.
"It's a national icon as well as one of Dorset's icons, so we're delighted to be able to reopen it, but it's sad it's taken so long."

Ex Output:
Steps leading down to one of the UK's most famous coastal landmarks have reopened - more than two years after they were removed.


Ex Input:
Warwick Medical School is leading the trial after concerns adrenaline, used to restart the heart, could cause brain damage and even death.
West Midlands Ambulance Service said the work could ultimately save "hundreds of patients".
The trial, involving some 8,000 patients, will start in the autumn.
It will see ambulance staff in the West Midlands, London, Wales, and on the south coast and north-east of England inject roughly half of the the patients with adrenaline and the others with a salt solution placebo.
Patients, however, will not be able to give consent as they will be unconscious, prompting criticism from some experts.
Paramedics and other clinical staff will also be unaware which patients received the placebo.
West Midlands Ambulance Service medical director Dr Andy Carson said: "Although adrenaline has been used for many years in cardiac arrest management, there is growing evidence that it may result in poorer outcomes for patients, hence the trial."
He said developments in technology suggested the drug "may cause more harm than good".
The British Heart Foundation has also supported the study.
Ken Timmis, chair of the Wolverhampton Coronary Aftercare Support Group, said he was confident his members would support any project that could ultimately "lead to better survival rates".
About 50,000 people a year in the UK suffer a cardiac arrest, according to Warwick Medical School, but resuscitation is successful in just one in four cases.
Dr Carson said defibrillation and CPR would be used as normal, while the trial would not affect patients suffering from conditions such as anaphylaxis.
He said patients suffering heart attacks would not be affected as adrenaline is not used as part of the treatment.

Ex Output:

A study that will see some of its patients suffering cardiac arrest given a dummy drug has been backed by West Midlands Ambulance Service.


