In this task, you are given an article. Your task is to summarize the article in a sentence.

[Q]: Katharina Schiechtl's header gave the home side the lead while substitute Helen Ward should have equalised early in the second half
Sarah Puntigam and Nina Burger sealed victory for the Group Eight leaders.
It was a disappointing result for manager Jayne Ludlow, in charge of her first competitive game after succeeding Jarmo Matikainen in October 2014.
Sarah Zadrazil was prominent early in the game for Austria and tested goalkeeper Joanne Price with an effort from outside the box.
The home side went ahead on 25 minutes when Price failed to deal with Carina Wenninger's free-kick and Schiechtl nodded home.
Nia Jones headed over the crossbar in response before Laura Feiersinger hit the woodwork and a second attempt saved by Price.
Home keeper Manuela Zinsberger denied Seattle Reign's Jess Fishlock as Austria maintained their first-half lead.
Ward replaced Melissa Fletcher at the interval and the Reading striker came close to equalising early in the second half but shot wide following good work by Fishlock.
Wales struggled with set-pieces all evening and they conceded again with 17 minutes remaining when Puntigam scored directly from a corner.
Burger completed the scoring with a close-range header to secure Austria's second victory of the campaign after their 2-0 win against Kazakhstan
Wales' next game on 23 October is away to top seeds Norway, who earlier in the day began their campaign with a 4-0 win in Kazakhstan.
Wales manager Jayne Ludlow told BBC Radio Wales:
"There were many aspects I was pleased with but the fact that we got done by two set plays I'm not very pleased with.
"The last goal for them was a positional error so there are things we can correct and we can work on and build for the future.
"There were a few girls on that pitch who haven't experienced international football before so it was very pleasing to see their performances."
[A]: Wales women suffered defeat by Austria in their opening game of the Euro 2017 qualifying campaign in St Polten.


[Q]: It has certainly got him noticed, something which used to be a problem for the Liberal Democrats. He finds himself trending on twitter, along with a cheeky remix of the party political broadcast.
Although Mr Clegg has previously said that Liberal Democrats have nothing to apologise for, last year he did tell the leader of the Welsh Liberal Democrats: "I know I haven't always made your life easy, Kirsty, sorry about that."
In the same speech, Mr Clegg highlighted the possibility of St David's Day becoming a bank holiday in Wales.
The idea was launched in a UK government tourism strategy, which promised to consult the Welsh assembly on whether it should have the power to move the spring bank holiday from early May to March 1.
It was potentially good news for those parties which have campaigned for a St David's Day holiday, although David Jones, since promoted to David Cameron's cabinet, told MPs that it could have cross-border implications: "For that reason it is a matter that properly resides with this parliament".
So, eighteen months on, what's occurin'? Not much, by the look of it. The idea appears to have been quietly dropped.
I contacted the department for culture, media and sport to find out the latest state of play and was directed to a blog written some months ago by its former tourism minister.
John Penrose, for it was he, said: "We tested the water in a pretty general way, making it crystal clear that if there was no particular consensus - or a general feeling that the status quo was just fine, thank you very much - then that was what we'd go for."
Mr Penrose summed up the results of the "pre-consultation" like this:
"So no consensus. And - roll-of-drums - no change of bank holiday dates. And is this a victory for Merrie Englande lobbyists and a set-back for hoteliers; or is it a triumph for lawn-mower sellers and a defeat for punch-and-judy men? None of the above, really. More a case of doing what we said we'd do. Will there be headlines along the lines of MINISTER IN 'DOING WHAT PUBLIC WANT' SHOCKER? I rather doubt it."
Indeed, there were very few headlines at all. Mr Penrose was sacked in the reshuffle earlier this month but according to the DCMS when it comes to bank holidays the status quo remains.
Will Nick Clegg use his party conference to update voters on the policy or could there be another "sorry" on the way?
[A]: Nick Clegg hopes his apology for that pledge on university tuition fees will help ensure the Liberal Democrats' work in government is not overshadowed by the breakdown in trust over broken promises.


[Q]: The Ariane 6 will succeed the Ariane 5, which, although highly successful, is now facing stiff competition on price.
The politicians believe industry will find the new vehicle cheaper to construct and to operate.
European Space Agency member states authorised the project at a special council meeting in Luxembourg, where they also agreed funding for the space station and a rover to go to Mars.
All up, the Esa nations came forward with 5.924bn euros in contributions to cover a number of programmes over the next few years.
"I think I can summarise this ministerial council by saying it is a success; I'd even go so far as to say that it is a great success," said agency director-general Jean-Jacques Dordain.
The Ariane 5 has been operating since the mid-1990s and has come to dominate the market for putting up big commercial satellites.
But its position is now under threat from competitor services offering lower prices.  The fear is that the 5's position will be eroded inexorably in the latter half of this decade.
The Ariane 6 concept is seen as the riposte. This vehicle would employ more modern methods of production and a streamlined assembly to try to reduce unit costs.
Moreover, because the rocket's modular design can be tailored to a wide range of satellite and mission types, it should gain further economies from frequent use.
Ministers committed 4bn euros to cover not only the 6's development but also an upgrade to Esa's small Italian-built Vega rocket. In future, these two vehicles will actually share some propulsion elements.
"They will be a true family with the same DNA," said Mr Dordain.
After months - and a final day - of hard bargaining, Europe's two big space powers, France and Germany, came together to push Ariane 6 forward.
France always intended to put up most of the money, but it needed German support financially and programatically.
This it got by fulfilling commitments to the International Space Station, which Germany regards as central to its space endeavours.
The meeting agreed 800 million euros be spent on the ISS and related activities up to 2017 - just 20 million short of what had been asked at the start of the day.
This was achieved in part by the Italians promising to return eventually to funding levels it withdrew from a couple of years ago, and by the UK, which gave a "one-off" payment to the ISS at the last ministerial gathering in 2012, coming up with a further, increased contribution.
The third big issue for the Luxembourg gathering concerned the ExoMars rover, which is due to be sent to the Red Planet in 2018 to search for signs of past or present life.
It is a project with a troubled history that has come within a breath of being cancelled on more than one occasion.
Its persistent woe has been a shortfall in the money needed to carry the venture through to completion. This gap is on the order of 200 million euros. Ministers could only promise 140 million euros in Luxembourg, even after the UK and Italy, the "champions of ExoMars", upped their participation. But Mr Dordain told reporters the sum was enough for now to keep the mission on track.
"It means I can sign industrial contracts next year," he explained.
Other programmes to be approved at the meeting included the next phase of Sentinel-6, a future satellite for the EU to measure the shape of the oceans; and "AnySat", which is a concept for small, adaptable telecommunications spacecraft.
[A]:
Research ministers have approved the development of a new rocket for Europe.


