But there has to be a limit, as you acknowledge. Perpetual copyright is not permitted. Who is the judge of -- within that line? Who is the judge of when it becomes unlimited? Is there, in other words, judicial review and, if there is, what standard would this Court apply to determine whether something short of perpetual is still unlimited?
Does this next sentence follow, given the preceding text?
The court acknowledged limit was 80 years. 
It's impossible to say