We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

You���re [apparently] 2 times more likely to robbed and 2.5 times as likely to be assaulted in the UK compared to the US.
Valid

It contends that, as recognized in Heller, the Second Amendment does not prevent the government from prohibiting firearms in sensitive places, which includes GMU's university buildings and widely attended university events.
Valid

Who's to say that someone doesn't board a plane, with no intent to criminal act, drinks way too much, then lets a few rounds off as he trips out

Valid

