We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

The illusion that the English government had protected its citizens by disarming them seemed credible because few realized the country had an astonishingly low level of armed crime even before guns were restricted.
Valid

I thought my point was to prove that your laws would be so open that heavily armed Arabs could walk onto the plane and very easily take it over.
Valid

I wonder how many criminals follow this strict regimen to legally posess an inanimate object on their private property?

Valid

