instruction:
The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the other-need strategy, otherwise output No. other-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used when the participants discuss a need for someone else rather than themselves. For instance, describing the need for firewood to keep the kids warm.
question:
Context: 'I would love as much food as is available. I would also appreciate excess firewood, as I get cold.' 'Okay, it seems we both have the same priorities in food most and firewood second most. How about this, you take 2 packages of food, I will take 1. You give me 2 packages of firewood I will give you 1. We will then divide the water. Is that fair?' 'That sounds really fair! 🙂'
Utterance: 'Would you be willing to give me 2 water and you take 1?'
answer:
No


question:
Context: 'Hello, what are your preferences for extra supplies?  I am greatly in need of food and water.  We will be doing a lot of activity in a hot, dry climate.🙂' 'I prefer firewood because I will get cold at night. I forgot blankets ☹️'
Utterance: 'Would it work for you, then, to give me the three food and three water, and I can give you all of the firewood?'
answer:
No


question:
Context: 'Alright, can you repeat the deal with me so we can make sure we are on the same page? ' 'ok, I am getting 1 food package, two packages of firewood, and all of the water.  Is this correct?  ' 'I thought I was taking 2 food packages, 3 waters and 1 firewood package. '
Utterance: 'Right, I typed in what that I was getting  lol  '
answer:

No


