Given a post that is a real-life anecdote of a complex ethical situation and an associated claim about its type, verify if the claim is true or not. The claim asks if the posts are historical or hypothetical. The posts are "HISTORICAL" when the author has already done something and they are "HYPOTHETICAL" when the author is considering doing something in the future. Say 'yes' if the claim is true otherwise say 'no'
Q: CLAIM : The following post is HISTORICAL. POST : Before you read, if you are currently watching the Dororo anime and don't want it spoiled like I was do not proceed!

&amp;#x200B;

So basically I made a meme on the r/Dororo subreddit that gained a bit of attention, in the comments someone decided to post a spoiler but apparently they only suggested it could happen. The conversation goes like this:  


 P1: Regained depression after realizing what Mio did for a living :,( 

Me:  Yeah IKR, it started so cute with the bow scene and just descended! 

SP:   And throw salt on it when she gets killed 

Me:  I tagged this as a spoiler for episode five, not the manga. I hope you realise how mad I am that you decided to take a spoiler from the manga to an anime post. Please be more considerate in the future. 

SP:  I did not spoil anything. What I said was up for speculation as I did not confirm anything. You, on the other hand, just confirmed it yourself. Therefore, YOU are the one who just spoiled it. 

&amp;#x200B;

If you want to see this yourself please navigate through my profile as I don't like promoting my posts on other subreddits. Who really is the spoiler here though? I have never read the manga and didn't know she died until I read his comment, but was I supposed to infer he wasn't confirming it?  
   

A: 
no