instruction:
The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the other-need strategy, otherwise output No. other-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used when the participants discuss a need for someone else rather than themselves. For instance, describing the need for firewood to keep the kids warm.
question:
Context: 'no its not i give you i water i get 1 food and 1 firewood' 'We only have 3 of each to divide up.. so yes, you're going to have to give me one more on an item.. but in exchange I'm giving you 1 more on two different items.  I'm getting 4 items in total, you're getting 5.. - You're essentially netting 11% more 'items' than I am in this deal. ' 'thats the point as you need water so badly'
Utterance: 'Correct.. I do.. but if you're not willing to budge on this where you're still netting more overall value I understand - I'm bummed but I understand.'
answer:
No


question:
Context: 'Yes. Can you help me to give some extra fodd?' 'I am willing to give you the good, though it would help us--we have a large group.  I really would like to take the water.  We are camping out in a primitive campsite with no running water.' 'Ya sure. '
Utterance: 'Sorry for the type--I meant 'food' not 'good'.🙂'
answer:
No


question:
Context: 'With the cool weather in degrees lower than expected, my family of 7 are consuming firewood faster than expected. Thus, I would like all the firewood in exchange for the food' 'Oh ok, that will be great. How about the water? Is 2 for me and 1 for you ok?' 'How about 2 for me 🙂'
Utterance: 'I have 3 kids with me who are always thirsty but we can negotiate for it'
answer:

Yes


