We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

[EX Q]: Sent1: If I ever "murder" someone without cause, I would deserve to die.
 Sent2: If a person commits murder, I don't believe they deserve to live.
[EX A]: Similar

[EX Q]: Sent1: My final point is, whether you believe in the afterlife or whether you think once we're dead this is it, do you not think death is the least punishing form of punishment?
 Sent2: If you think there shouldn't be a death penalty, you're an idiot.
[EX A]: Not similar

[EX Q]: Sent1: >_> Says the person who brought up freaking Nelson in a debate about the death penalty for murders.
 Sent2: Last time I checked, killing doesn't bring persons back to life, so the only reason for the death penalty seems to be revenge.
[EX A]:
Not similar

