Given the task definition, example input & output, solve the new input case.
Given a post that is a real-life anecdote of a complex ethical situation and a question asks if AUTHOR, NOBODY, EVERYBODY, or OTHER is wrong in the situation. Answer the question and classify your answers into yes or no.
Example: Is AUTHOR wrong in the post ? POST :  Pretty much was hanging out with two friends. I was watching the Lakers game. They won at the very last minute and I immediately hopped up and celebrated. Before I could even finish celebrating one friend started going on about how the Lakers suck. It just pissed me off so much I screamed at her to get out my room until she left. 


She knows I'm a huge fan and she likes them too. She was only saying it to antagonize me. Am I the dick here?
Output: yes
It is very rude to shout at someone and ask her to leave the room even if her comments may have antagonized the author. Hence author is at fault here.

New input case for you: Is OTHER wrong in the post ? POST : In my state the landlord has 90 says to either return the security deposit in full it a partial with an itemized list of deductions. Knowing that I set a Google calendar alert for 90 says after my lease termination. 

After I got my alert, I waited a few more days, then sent an email asking about my deposit. The LL then got back to me with an itemized list of charges. The state statute is very clear, after the 90 days LL forfeits any right to withhold anything from the security deposit. I pointed this out in a reply, and demanded my deposit back. LL is now claiming I'm using a technicality, they're also claiming that they could have charged more but were nice not to. 

Keep in mind also, according to the statute, LL could end up paying treble damages if I have to sue for the deposit.
Output:
yes