You will be given a definition of a task first, then some input of the task.
Given a post that is a real-life anecdote of a complex ethical situation and an associated claim about its type, verify if the claim is true or not. The claim asks if the posts are historical or hypothetical. The posts are "HISTORICAL" when the author has already done something and they are "HYPOTHETICAL" when the author is considering doing something in the future. Say 'yes' if the claim is true otherwise say 'no'

CLAIM : The following post is HISTORICAL. POST : So this guy over in r/SquaredCircle is being an asshat. I made an account and shared news on that account from ringsidenews (which is the best wrestling dirtsheet by the way, we literally cover every thing wrestling related. Nothing misses our radar) and this guy JT_Diamond starts accusing me of being a shill for the website. He’s constantly burying our website and letting content from other dirtsheets (Which is posted all day everyday) slip past without making a big deal out of it. So now I’m just making accounts playing off his username to irritate him. 

I never targeted him before, he targeted me. He said all we did is make “burner” accounts to share our news. Our site gets 5 million hits a month, I don’t need some mark ass wrestling fan on Reddit to boost our profile. He made a big post just to get upvoted and talked about how we were “spamming” that sub. Dude literally gets on my last nerve, so I’m giving him a reason to hate me.  
Output:
no