The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the vouch-fair strategy, otherwise output No. vouch-fair is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used to call out fairness for personal benefit, either when acknowledging a fair deal or when the opponent offers a deal that benefits them. This can be through an explicit call out or can be implied.

Q: Context: 'yes i can agree to that, thats a good compromise' 'yay, thank you so much! to very I am getting 3 waters, 0 firewood, and 1 food?' 'i will be getting 3 firewood, 0 water and 2 food'
Utterance: 'perfect! submitting deal, thank you so much for understanding'

A: No
****
Q: Context: 'Since this is the first time for the family to be camping, having plenty of food for everyone is on the top of my list.' 'I am fine with you having the 3 foods. Is it okay if I have 3 water units We are fasting and need lots of hydration.' 'Are you sure you need all of the water? It would be nice to have some extra.'
Utterance: 'Well, we do need the water pretty badly. But I guess wanting all the water is stingy so I will pack extra water since we are not packing food. How about you guys receive 1 water and 3 food units?'

A: Yes
****
Q: Context: 'Firewood is not overly interesting to me, but water is somewhat enticing.' 'Ok, great - I can give you all of my waters in exchange for a majority of the food and half of firewood' 'Half of firewood? There are 3 so one of us has to get more. I would need more of that. '
Utterance: 'Yep, I know there's three and no way to split evenly lol - can you give me a justifiable reason as to why you deserve more over me? Please convince me.'

A:
Yes
****
