The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the no-need strategy, otherwise output No. no-need is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used when a participant points out that they do not need an item based on personal context such as suggesting that they have ample water to spare. no-need can directly benefit the opponent since it implies that the item is up for grabs.
One example is below.
Q: Context: 
Utterance: 'how about I give you 2 waters and 1 food package in exchange for all your firewood?'
A: No
Rationale: The utterance does not use the no-need strategy since it never refers to an item that the participant does not need.
Q: Context: 'Hey there how are you?' 'I am fine friend. I need a lot of firewood though. It is freezing' 'I definitely need firewood as well. We didn't anticipate it being as freezing cold as it is at night. There isn't much around us. We've also been using a lot of water, which we could use more of since we've been looking for firewood.'
Utterance: 'Your needs are like mine. I have a condition that require  me to shower quite often. It is a shame but if I do not shower for 3 hours I will stink.  '
A:
No