Given a post that is a real-life anecdote of a complex ethical situation and an associated claim about its type, verify if the claim is true or not. The claim asks if the posts are historical or hypothetical. The posts are "HISTORICAL" when the author has already done something and they are "HYPOTHETICAL" when the author is considering doing something in the future. Say 'yes' if the claim is true otherwise say 'no'
One example: CLAIM : The following post is HISTORICAL. POST : Background: I have ocd and the only contamination issue I have is around food. Both parents know this. What has lead me to ask this question is this mornings reaction from parent B.

This morning parent b offered to make me breakfast, I responded how I always do: that’s very kind but I’m happy to come make it myself. Parent b said it was no trouble. I accepted. Two slices of toast came and apu I check the toast for signs of mould. First piece had no issues, I ate it. Second piece however had something green growing on the edge. I cut this bit off but I couldn’t shake in my head that the whole piece must be contaminated and so I took the toast back and apologised that I couldn’t eat it cos of the mould and we checked the date on the bread and it said the 30th December. Nearly a week past its best before. Parent b apologised and we threw it away. No drama.

Nearly identical situation occurred about 6 months ago with parent a. Parent a offered to make me a toasted sandwich. I said that would be very kind but I was happy to make it myself. Parent a said it was no problem, I accepted. When the sandwich came I checked the bread for mould and found green and white stuff growing down one side of the bread. I take it back to the kitchen and explain that it has mould and I’m sorry but I can’t eat it. I will make myself something else. Parent a goes ballistic. I’m “ungrateful and don’t trust them and did I really think they’d feed me mould?” I pointed out the mould- clearly visible. “Well someone must’ve not sealed the bread package properly (ie me) and that’s how it got mouldy.” I asked if parent a had checked the date and that just seemed to escalate their reaction. They stormed out screaming and crying. I checked the bread date and it was 2 or 3 days past the best before.

Aita in either situation? Parent a’s reaction made me think I was. But now I’ve had the same situation with parent b and they didn’t get angry or pissed off maybe I wasn’t the asshole? Obviously I think I need to just make my own food. Then I can’t cause trouble.
Solution is here: yes
Explanation: The post clearly mentions an event in the past when the author asked some questions to his/her parents and also describes about their reactions on that day. Hence this should be HISTORICAL.

Now, solve this: CLAIM : The following post is HISTORICAL. POST : Throwaway account just in case.

So I play this mmo rpg game where I am a member of a guild. This guild includes me, my friend Tom (not his real name) and 5 other members. Then we have John, another friend of mine (which I'm also seeing IRL now, but we don't have a relationship yet) that has no connection with the guild at all.

Tom and I were the new members of the guild. The others having played this game for years had collected a nice amount of money (about 9 000 000 coins) and put it all in the guild-bank. Because Tom and I were new, we couldn't contribute any good amount to it.

Anyway, recently the guild got into some drama (me and Tom were not in the drama), but everyone started leaving until it was just me and Tom. The guild-leader who also left put me in charge of everything including our base and the money. Basically, I was the leader of this dead guild. For the money he said (I qoute) "Just share it with Tom or something"

Clearly that was just a suggestion. So I thought it would be nice to give John a bit of it too (he never had a guild and was also new so why not?). I kept 4 500 000, gave 3 500 000 to John and 1 000 000 to Tom. Considering I was in charge, it was my money so I had the rights to it. If Tom had contributed something, i would take that into account, but he didn't.

When Tom noticed the amount here received he messaged me saying it was quite  a small amount from the total (only that but I know what he impled). I said it was a fair amount and that he should be happy because I could also give nothing. Then he told me it wasn't fair to keep 8 million and just give 1 million, to which I replied I shared it with another friend (John) outside the guild. He got upset by that and told me John had no input to the guild at all and I just said again that I was in charge of the money and I can use it as I want and that he should just be happy. He clearly got upset and doesn't talk to me anymore which is an overreaction.

So, AITA for sharing money of our non-existing guild with someone from outside even though I was clearly put in charge over it?
Solution:
no