We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.
One example is below.
Q: If gun bans worked there would be no gun deaths in the countries that have banned guns.
A: Valid
Rationale: It is an argument that claims that gun bans will not work.
Q: I would wager that those (85%) have no idea what the gun laws are and once the Supreme Court gets through and does a lot of deleting as it has already begun, then 100% will like the changes.
A:
Valid