Given a post that is a real-life anecdote of a complex ethical situation and an associated claim about its type, verify if the claim is true or not. The claim asks if the posts are historical or hypothetical. The posts are "HISTORICAL" when the author has already done something and they are "HYPOTHETICAL" when the author is considering doing something in the future. Say 'yes' if the claim is true otherwise say 'no'
Q: CLAIM : The following post is HISTORICAL. POST : Long story short, my wife and I had an argument. It's not important what the argument was about, but to her it was something small and meaningless, while to me it was something a lot more important, which I felt incredibly strongly about, and she knew this. To be fair and to try and give an honest retelling, it's definitely possible she knew, but didn't realize just how important it was to me. 

Towards the end of the argument she said things like "OK, so I won't do it again" and "I didn't understand, I didn't know you felt that this was that important to you".

Then, her last sentence, after we had gone several rounds, hashed things out quite thoroughly and this had pretty much blown over, was along the lines of "Look at how upset you got over such a small thing". At that point I told her that either she wasn't listening to me when I told her how important this was to me, or she was lying when she told me she understood. This of course kicked off a new argument. 

Was I an asshole for saying the sentence which kicked off the second argument?
A: 
yes