You will be given a context and a verb separated with a newline character, and you have to answer if the given verb can be anchored in time or not. We say a verb can be anchored in the real timeline if and only if a verb happened in the past, is happening now, or is guaranteed to happen in the future. The output should be "Yes" if the verb can be anchored in time and "No" otherwise.
One example: It was followed by Denmark, Norway, Germany, France, Greece, Luxembourg, Spain, Britain, the United States, Iceland, Belgium, Italy, Portugal and Turkey. NATO decided at last year's Madrid summit to (invite) the three eastern European countries to start accession talks.  
 Verb: invite
Solution is here: No
Explanation: This is a good example. The "invite" is not anchorable. Although NATO decided to invite them, they haven't invited them yet, and it's not guaranteed to happen in the future. They might change their decision later.

Now, solve this: Carpenter said the U.S. government's counterterrorism program has paid out over $6 million in some 20 cases around the world for credible information. On the FBI list, Bin Laden and Kopp replace two former Libyan intelligence agents charged in the Dec. 21, 1988, bombing of Pan Am Flight 103 that (killed) 259 people on the plane and 11 on the ground in Lockerbie, Scotland.  
 Verb: killed
Solution:
Yes