Use a disfluent question or a proper question and find the answer to the question based on the given context or return None if an answer can't be found. A disfluent question is a question that has some interruptions in it while framing. A proper question is the correct form of the question without any disfluency.

Let me give you an example: proper question: In what year did the U of C become one of 7 founding members of the Association of Chicago Universities? 
 disfluent question: In what year did Robert Harper or did the U of C become one of 7 founding members of the Association of Chicago Universities? 
 context: Founded by the American Baptist Education Society with a donation from oil magnate and wealthiest man in history John D. Rockefeller, the University of Chicago was incorporated in 1890; William Rainey Harper became the university's first president in 1891, and the first classes were held in 1892. Both Harper and future president Robert Maynard Hutchins advocated for Chicago's curriculum to be based upon theoretical and perennial issues rather than on applied sciences and commercial utility. With Harper's vision in mind, the University of Chicago also became one of the 14 founding members of the Association of American Universities, an international organization of leading research universities, in 1900.
The answer to this example can be: None
Here is why: The answer to the above question is not found from the context hence it is not answerable so the output is 'None' so it is a positive example.

OK. solve this:
proper question: What report has the problem of a lack of scientific confidence? 
 disfluent question: What research, umm I mean report has the problem of a lack of scientific confidence? 
 context: Since the IPCC does not carry out its own research, it operates on the basis of scientific papers and independently documented results from other scientific bodies, and its schedule for producing reports requires a deadline for submissions prior to the report's final release. In principle, this means that any significant new evidence or events that change our understanding of climate science between this deadline and publication of an IPCC report cannot be included. In an area of science where our scientific understanding is rapidly changing, this has been raised as a serious shortcoming in a body which is widely regarded as the ultimate authority on the science. However, there has generally been a steady evolution of key findings and levels of scientific confidence from one assessment report to the next.[citation needed]
Answer:
None