We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gun Control)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Q: Sent1: In order to have a 'well regulated' militia you can not bar the civilian populace of its right to keep and bear arms!
 Sent2: Please respond to your opponents comments that you have taken "the right to keep and bear arms" statement and used it without the context specifically "the well regulated militia".

A: Not similar
****
Q: Sent1: The reality is that in developed nations with stricter gun laws than the US there are less outlaws owning and using guns.
 Sent2: Criminals will always find ways to get around gun laws which is why there are a lot less criminals who own and use guns in places like the UK and Australia.

A: Similar
****
Q: Sent1: So guns kept in a home appear to attract criminals rather than deter them.
 Sent2: Even "If criminals keep their guns",(if we were to confiscate all guns) " they wont be able to use them.

A:
Not similar
****
