The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the other-need strategy, otherwise output No. other-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used when the participants discuss a need for someone else rather than themselves. For instance, describing the need for firewood to keep the kids warm.

[Q]: Context: 'Hi there! Well first I was wondering what item you think you'd like or need the most?' 'I like firewood and water most' 'Hmm okay, I am willing to give you three waters! I was hoping to get 3 firewood though, as it's going to be really cold where I am going.'
Utterance: 'seems like we have same priority items. firewood. I also need firewood most because I am prone to pneumonia '
[A]: No


[Q]: Context: 'No, I don't take this. Because food is important for my child and me.' 'Try to understand our situation. We had food a week back. We were drinking only water for the whole week. We are dying of hunger. Kindly understand our situation.' 'Even me too facing the same, but i am ready to share one food with you. You can offer me more water to safe myself without dying. Both will be happy'
Utterance: 'Okay I shall give you 1 package of food and 2 packages of water. Is that okay for you now?'
[A]: No


[Q]: Context: 'Hello.  I am very interested in the firewood and would be very willing to forfeit all the water.' 'oh really.  i am willing to make a negotiation with you on that for sure.  where are you plannign to camp?' 'I'm camping near a natural spring and will have all the water I need.  How are you planning to eat?'
Utterance: 'i have some spare cans but i am not too worried about it.  its a low prioirty for me '
[A]:
No


