The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the other-need strategy, otherwise output No. other-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used when the participants discuss a need for someone else rather than themselves. For instance, describing the need for firewood to keep the kids warm.

Context: 'Hi there.. we're looking forward to this camping trip.. hope you are, too!  Is there anything in particular you guys need / want out of the extra stockpile we've got?'
Utterance: 'Hello! Which item do you need the most?'
No

Context: 'Fine.' 'You aren't very talkative are you? What preferences do you have for packages?😮😮😮' 'I would really like 2 water and 2 firewood and 1 food.'
Utterance: 'I would like 3 water no firewood and 2 food. I have 8 people in my family and I have a medical condition where I can only drink water and have to drink 100 ounces per day.'
Yes

Context: 'Since I have never been camping before, why do you think you need 2 firewood?' 'Unfortunately, I have arthritis so being sure to keep warm and the dampness away in the evening, heat is important for me.' 'Ok.  I am worried about animals and bugs so I would prefer 2 firewood.  But I am happy with the 3 food🙂'
Utterance: 'Ok, how about we shift a bit as I hear you on the bugs and animals.  I think I can get by with one firewood and use extra covers and meds.  But, will need plenty of water and some food.  How about I take 1 firewood, 2 water and 2 food.'

No

