We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gun Control)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

[EX Q]: Sent1: It is legal to own weapons in this country, they are just tightly controlled, and as a result we have far less gun crime (particularly where it's not related to organised crime).
 Sent2: Prohibition led to an increase in organized crime, but that hasn't seemed to happen in nations that have banned guns.
[EX A]: Not similar

[EX Q]: Sent1: They argue that the second amendment allows the people the power of weapons so that if the government intrudes on their rights they can defend themselves.
 Sent2: How can a people defend themselves from the government, unless they are able to maintain the same weapons as the government has?
[EX A]: Not similar

[EX Q]: Sent1: I do not believe OTHERS should not have guns, I think criminals and psychos who are yet to convict a gun crime should not have guns.
 Sent2: I think we recognize that gun control laws can reduce the number of criminals owning guns although not disarm every criminal.
[EX A]:
Not similar

