You will be given a context and a verb separated with a newline character, and you have to answer if the given verb can be anchored in time or not. We say a verb can be anchored in the real timeline if and only if a verb happened in the past, is happening now, or is guaranteed to happen in the future. The output should be "Yes" if the verb can be anchored in time and "No" otherwise.
One example is below.
Q: It was followed by Denmark, Norway, Germany, France, Greece, Luxembourg, Spain, Britain, the United States, Iceland, Belgium, Italy, Portugal and Turkey. NATO decided at last year's Madrid summit to (invite) the three eastern European countries to start accession talks.  
 Verb: invite
A: No
Rationale: This is a good example. The "invite" is not anchorable. Although NATO decided to invite them, they haven't invited them yet, and it's not guaranteed to happen in the future. They might change their decision later.
Q: Meissner gave no reason for the Jan. 14 deadline, and it is still unclear how Elian would be transported back to Cuba if the Gonzalez family's appeals are unsuccessful. The INS offered three options : that Gonzalez come to pick up his son, that the family in Miami (take) him to Cuba, or that a  third party  escort the child to his homeland.  
 Verb: take
A:
No