We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gun Control)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Q: Sent1: In the dicta from a maritime law case the Supreme Court commented that state laws restricting concealed weapons do not infringe upon the right to bear arms protected by the Federal Second Amendment."
 Sent2: Indeed, the right to keep and bear arms���which we have explained pre-existed, and therefore was preserved by, the Second Amendment���was subject to restrictions at common law.

A: Not similar
****
Q: Sent1: The 2nd Amendment is not there to entitle you to all of the gun control you want!
 Sent2: Which would be worthless because you could just repeal that amendment and then repeal the 2nd.

A: Not similar
****
Q: Sent1: Making guns illegal wouldn't solve anything except to take them away from people that want to defend themselves.
 Sent2: So if someone wants to protect themself from a wild animal do they need a gun?

A:
Not similar
****
