Detailed Instructions: Given a post that is a real-life anecdote of a complex ethical situation and an associated claim about its type, verify if the claim is true or not. The claim asks if the posts are historical or hypothetical. The posts are "HISTORICAL" when the author has already done something and they are "HYPOTHETICAL" when the author is considering doing something in the future. Say 'yes' if the claim is true otherwise say 'no'
Problem:CLAIM : The following post is HISTORICAL. POST : I have been doing a lot of thinking lately. I think there is too much hate in this world and the Christian myth has truth within it that people do not recognize. That being said, I sometimes don't know when I should talk about it. 

AITA for this comment:
OC:
&gt;Seems like his base is legitimately finally eroding. Thank you Jesus. 
The non college educated whites are slow to change. Very stubborn. They often don’t have the time to pay close attention to the details. Many get their news through daytime right wing radio because they are in trucks and cars all day or on worksites. 
It’s really hard to get through to them.  If they give way, the end really is near. 

Me:


&gt;&gt;Why are you talking about them that way? Sure they're people but they are people that make the exact same mistakes you do. This is simply a mistake that has had drastic effects. 
Trump was able to produce a cult of personality that was spread through the US directly to hurt people (who needed answers) by Putin's successful efforts to infiltrate the common denominator of all public entertainment: advertising. In doing so, he created the deadliest propaganda machine in history. 
Do not even for a second blame someone's grandma, grandpa or uncle who was just laid off and losing money as they saw people around them and around the world grow richer. When Trump promised the good ole days, they believed him. "At least it's worth a chance". 
I'm cautious against railing against Putin. Imagine being born in the middle of the most contentious global war in history. Both sides relied heavily on intelligence, nationalism and various other technologies of information warfare in order to win in a way that hadn't been attempted before- without directly attacking each other. Every American plan to invade the USSR (and vice versa) was dumped due to MAD, so new warfare was invented. Why do people expect the Russian national pride remain stable following the conclusion of the Cold War? There are tons of evidence towards the latter- (Anyone with a history book ought to investigate the fall of the Weimar Republic) with one intellectual (Aleksandr Dugin) laying the strategy to regain superiority within the world. 
In both cases, we don't see evil people. Rather, they are individuals who have seen the purpose that they centered their life around crumble in the face of new powers (China and The West). We ought to pity and love the losers. Not hate them when they try winning again. 
Edit: Cowards. You realize you are wrong and you don't like that. Grow up and recognize the complexity of people



I want to address hated at the roots and r/Trumpgret seems a great place to start. How should I continue to work to convey love and peace to a political ideology that claims to be on the side of the marginalized?


[Source](https://www.reddit.com/r/Trumpgret/comments/afp6aw/donald_trumps_approval_sinking_among_his_base/ee154an?context=1)
Solution:
no