Detailed Instructions: In this task, you will be shown a prompt from a judicial decision and multiple holding statements derived from citations following text in a legal decision.  Holdings represent the governing legal rule when the law is applied to a particular set of facts. There are five answer choices for each citing text. The correct answer is the holding statement that corresponds to the citing text. You should write an incorrect option. Even though there exist multiple wrong answers, we only need a single wrong answer. There is a <HOLDING> token in the position of the citing text prompt where the holding statement was extracted.
Q: date of the amendment. Jordan v. Dennison, 278 N.J.Super. 306, 311, 650 A.2d 1041 (App.Div.1995). Although the Legislature substantially modified the no-fault laws in 1988, and then again effective March 12, 1990, the provisions of the Fund Law, including N.J.S.A 39:6-70(n), were not changed. The Fund Law has remained constant since enactment and still requires that the threshold of N.J.S A 39:6A-8a be met if the injured party seeks recovery from the fund. Thus, after January 1, 1989, a person would not be entitled to recover noneconomic damages resulting from injury caused by an identified uninsured motorist from the Fund unless her injuries met the “verbal threshold” delineated in one of nine categories of N.J.S A 39:6A-8a. Cf. Rivera, supra, 285 N.J.Super. at 180, 666 A.2d 619 (<HOLDING>). Plaintiff contends that the failure to amend 
 Holding statements: (A) holding that racial discrimination is not a personal injury tort (B) holding that age discrimination is not a personal injury tort (C) holding that a negligence claim is not a personal injury tort claim (D) holding that sexual harassment is a personal injury tort (E) holding that the tort threshold requirement njsa 39670n is not applicable if the injury to a qualified claimant is caused by a hit and run motorist
A:
holding that racial discrimination is not a personal injury tort