Given a post that is a real-life anecdote of a complex ethical situation and an associated claim about its type, verify if the claim is true or not. The claim asks if the posts are historical or hypothetical. The posts are "HISTORICAL" when the author has already done something and they are "HYPOTHETICAL" when the author is considering doing something in the future. Say 'yes' if the claim is true otherwise say 'no'

CLAIM : The following post is HISTORICAL. POST : TL;DR at bottom

So I'm a big basketball person, and I decided recently that I'd try to get back into playing shape. I renewed my membership at the local sports center and today was my first day back. Now, the multi-purpose room, which is essentially just an indoor basketball courts with dumbbell racks and a badminton net you can set up, is open use from 6-8:30 am. My plan was get in as early as possible so I'd be able to play without bothering anyone/being bothered, for maybe an hour or so until I can go longer. Today at around 6:40 these 2 guys came in with badminton equipment and asked how much longer I'd be staying, saying there's a group that usually plays from 6-6:30 and maybe I should join them. I just shrugged and said something along the lines of " Oh maybe, I'll think about it", and then left. Now, the badminton setup takes up the whole room basically because of how much space you need to move around, and I feel like taking up a whole room for two people is kinda selfish. At least what I'm doing only takes up half and can involve 5 other people. WIBTA if I go back some other day and refuse to leave until I want to?

TL;DR I go in early at a gym to play basketball, two guys ask me to leave before I want to so they can play badminton even though the room is free use. WIBTA if I refuse to leave next time? 
no