Read the given text and if it has abusive content then indicate via "yes". Otherwise indicate via"no". 
We consider the content to be abusive if it contains any of the following instances: (1) Identity Directed Abuse (e.g., Content which contains a negative statement made against an identity. An identity is a social category that relates to a fundamental aspect of individuals community, socio-demographics, position or self-representation) (2) Affiliation Directed Abuse (e.g., Content which express negativity against an affiliation. We define affiliation as a (more or less) voluntary association with a collective. Affiliations include but are not limited to: memberships (e.g. Trade unions), party memberships (e.g. Republicans), political affiliations (e.g. Right-wing people) and occupations (e.g. Doctors).) (3) Person Directed Abuse (e.g., Content which directs negativity against an identifiable person, who is either part of the conversation thread or is named. Person-directed abuse includes serious character based attacks, such as accusing the person of lying, as well as aggression, insults and menacing language.) and (4) Counter Speech (e.g., Content which challenges, condemns or calls out the abusive language of others.). Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].

Input: Consider Input: meh there is one of those for video streaming.       Playon is a streaming aggregate I use.     Wonder if there will be a gaming one.

Output: no


Input: Consider Input: Right.. I can't help but feel like using this reasoning abortion is insanely insensitive to those who have miscarriages. But I get the feelings the same people outraged would disagree.

Output: no


Input: Consider Input: Yeah I think you're right. I asked ParkRanger about banning and she said something really vague about some people being banned for shady reasons during all the turmoil, and that she was willing to revisit those bans yet she wouldn't confirm who was doing the questionable banning. I don't know if it was her, Trailangel, or some other mod. But she did reinstate some people who had been banned. Who knows! I think at this point if the mods don't reign in the people who started the drama (who Trailangel called the old guard) things will continue to spiral. But I think the old guard folks have too much power and influence with the mods so there is unlikely to be any action taken against the people who are stirring up the drama & so the drama will continue.


Output: no


