Given the task definition and input, reply with output. Given a post that is a real-life anecdote of a complex ethical situation and a question asks if AUTHOR, NOBODY, EVERYBODY, or OTHER is wrong in the situation. Answer the question and classify your answers into yes or no.

Is AUTHOR wrong in the post ? POST : So, I've been with my girlfriend for 5 - 6 years. She is great, her spirit animal is a Honey Badger as she small and cute, then furiously aggressive with the capacity to terrify lions. Her main, minor fault is it is very difficult to get her to compromise as she is so strong willed with her convictions.

This often leads to us abandoning large plans such as weddings as my requirements don't meet hers, resulting in arguments and refusal.

At some point we may have some kids. I don't like some of her suggested names as they make no sense and often think they do not align with what I envisaged for the fruit of our loins. 

Me: "Harrison? My name is not Harry. You got that from Dexter. Nope." She is adamant. She is furious and will not relent (Honeybadger). 

She didn't like me referring to the cats litter tray as "Hopkins Shitbox" in front of other people, so I renamed it Harrison.

 I named the new vacuum Harrison. I named my new shoes Harrison. I even managed to name a large piece of maritime equipment at work Harrison (which is now actually official).

This is a single example. I do it with other of the names I do not like as well and that has worked well so far.

I think she is very keen on Harrison and as expected is completely unwavering. 

The potential kid may be named after a litter tray/specialised dredge pump. I don't like it.

Am I the asshole for using petty means to stop my girlfriend naming our potential kids names I don't like/agree with? 

&amp;#x200B;

yes