TASK DEFINITION: We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gun Control)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.
PROBLEM: Sent1: Unarmed law-abiding citizens are victims of gun crimes because criminals do not obey the gun ban in that gun free zone.
 Sent2: Criminals do not obey the laws about gun free zones.

SOLUTION: Similar

PROBLEM: Sent1: We don't have to choose between total regulation of guns or total denial of the problem of gun crime.
 Sent2: We have guns and we still have crime and lots of gun deaths.

SOLUTION: Not similar

PROBLEM: Sent1: You still have to prove that gun control equals crime control and your admission that it does not is proof that it is about control and dependency on government to protect you when they have no obligation to do so.
 Sent2: Doesn't hold together, though - you have no evidence that criminal arms supply is unaffected by gun control.

SOLUTION:
Not similar

