instruction:
The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the vouch-fair strategy, otherwise output No. vouch-fair is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used to call out fairness for personal benefit, either when acknowledging a fair deal or when the opponent offers a deal that benefits them. This can be through an explicit call out or can be implied.
question:
Context: 'Hi! How about I receive 3 food, 2 firewood, and 1 water?'
Utterance: 'I can't do that. It would leave me with no food at all. How about I take 2 food, and 1 firewood, and 1 water?'
answer:
Yes


question:
Context: 'We can try to figure out a way to split the water and food in the fairest way 🙂. Firewood isn't an issue so it doesn't matter as much. I think to start something like splitting the food 2/1 and the water 1/2?' 'That might work. I can always boil it and I could use the extra food for the kids.' 'Ok so I propose 2 water for me, 1 for you. 2 food for you, 1 for me. Firewood would be, 2 for you, 1 for me? Please give me your opinion if you want to reverse any of that.'
Utterance: 'That would work, the extra firewood would offset the need to have water on hand when I can boil it.'
answer:
No


question:
Context: '😡 I can let the firewood and water lax if you provide us food.' 'let me have two food and three parts of water, I can let you have all the firewood and one fpart food' 'We do have a fire to start, but we are very hungry. Diabetics can eat less food because of the small meals. Don't lie to me.'
Utterance: '😡my type of diabetes needs many meals otherwise my insulin levels will be low'
answer:

No


