We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gun Control)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

[EX Q]: Sent1: In order to have a 'well regulated' militia you can not bar the civilian populace of its right to keep and bear arms!
 Sent2: Deny, if you can, that your previous position defined the phrase ���right to keep and bear arms�۝ as a right of the states to equip the militias with both arms and ammunition.
[EX A]: Similar

[EX Q]: Sent1: The strongest reason for the people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government.
 Sent2: How can a people defend themselves from the government, unless they are able to maintain the same weapons as the government has?
[EX A]: Similar

[EX Q]: Sent1: Illinois is a gun control haven, the laws are very strict, various models of firearms are banned from civilian ownership, licenses of various kinds are needed for possession and purchasing, and there are no private sales, etc.
 Sent2: No law shall impose licensure, registration or special taxation on the ownership or possession of firearms or ammunition.
[EX A]:
Not similar

