You will be given a definition of a task first, then some input of the task.
Given a post that is a real-life anecdote of a complex ethical situation and an associated claim about its type, verify if the claim is true or not. The claim asks if the posts are historical or hypothetical. The posts are "HISTORICAL" when the author has already done something and they are "HYPOTHETICAL" when the author is considering doing something in the future. Say 'yes' if the claim is true otherwise say 'no'

CLAIM : The following post is HISTORICAL. POST : The free section of craigslist in my area gets far too many listings for pets, despite being specifically not acceptable for that section. 

Other Person lists *sick* kitten on craigslist free section, begging for someone to pay ten dollars for it and then take it to a vet. 

I send an email: 
&gt; 
&gt; Free stuff (no "wanted" ads, pets, promotional giveaways, or intangible/digital items please)  
&gt; 
&gt; What part of "no pets" do you not understand?

The first part is a direct cut and paste of the menu selection to select the free section, the second is my comment. 

Other Person Replies: 

&gt; You know, you dont have to be an asshole correct? 

If everyone put their unwanted pet on craigslist free, it would make that section far less usable, which is presumably why the rule exists. 

Am I the asshole for calling someone out for breaking the rules by spamming?


Output:
yes