Q: Given a post that is a real-life anecdote of a complex ethical situation and an associated claim about its type, verify if the claim is true or not. The claim asks if the posts are historical or hypothetical. The posts are "HISTORICAL" when the author has already done something and they are "HYPOTHETICAL" when the author is considering doing something in the future. Say 'yes' if the claim is true otherwise say 'no'
CLAIM : The following post is HYPOTHETICAL. POST : Title doesn’t explain the situation fully. Me and a group of friends get together every so often and play board games together of which I am one of the sole providers (of games that is). I feel I have poured hundreds of dollars into these games but they get mistreated by some of the players which I can understand to a degree. Now onto the WIBTA. Would asking my friends for 15 dollars to play a new “legacy” game I purchased make me an asshole? Legacy board games have to be played with the same people who are committed and after the campaign is over it cannot be replayed the same way. Would just like to recoup some of the money spent on the game to reinvest into a future legacy game for the group. But I’m getting a bit of backlash from some.
A:
yes