Generate an appropriate title for the given text. The generated title must be short and include the main topic of the text. The preferred titles are under fifteen words.

On 3 August, the ex-king made the shock announcement that he was leaving Spain amid a corruption investigation. The 82-year-old travelled to the UAE on 3 August "and he remains there", a spokesman said, giving no more details. The ex-king's finances are under scrutiny in a major corruption probe. He denies any wrongdoing and has said he is available if prosecutors need to interview him. Earlier this month, he announced the move in a letter to his son, Felipe, to whom he handed the throne six years ago. He said at the time was making the decision "in the face of the public repercussions that certain past events in my private life are generating" and in the hope of allowing his son to carry out his functions as king with "tranquillity". It was first reported that he had travelled to the Dominican Republic, but Spanish media later said he had arrived in Abu Dhabi, the capital of the UAE. However until now, neither the palace nor the government had confirmed his whereabouts. The former king is said to have travelled to the UAE on several occasions since his abdication in 2014. He is reported to be close to a number of key figures including the UAE's de facto leader, Abu Dhabi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Zayed al Nahyan Why did Juan Carlos leave? Juan Carlos abdicated in 2014 after close to 40 years in power and handed power to his son Felipe. His decision to give up the throne came after a corruption investigation involving his daughter's husband and a controversial elephant hunting trip the monarch took during Spain's financial crisis. The controversies however did not stop there. In June this year, Spain's Supreme Court launched an investigation into Juan Carlos's alleged involvement in a high-speed rail contract in Saudi Arabia, after the ex-king lost his immunity from prosecution following his abdication. Juan Carlos played a pivotal role in Spain's transition to democracy after Gen Francisco Franco's death in 1975, but his popularity and his health declined in the final years of his reign, leading him to pass the baton to his son.
Juan Carlos: Spain's former king confirmed to be in UAE

Daniel McClean, 54, was shot "a number of times" while sitting in a parked car on the Cliftonville Road. In 2019, the victim had been identified in court as being a dissident republican. Police said his killing was a "brutal and calculated murder" and officers are keeping an "open mind" about the motive. Det Supt Jason Murphy said dissident republican involvement was one line of inquiry. The shooting was reported to police at about 20:15 GMT and Mr McClean was pronounced dead at the scene. 'Local people traumatised' Det Supt Murphy said the shooting was carried out by someone who "has no regard for life". "It was carried out in a built up residential area, putting families living there at risk and it is extremely fortunate that no-one else was injured as a result of this shooting," he said. "I have no doubt that local people will have been left extremely traumatised by this ruthless murder." The senior officer said the gunman "crossed from Clifton Crescent and fired a number of shots at close range". "This gunman was wearing dark clothing and gloves and after the shooting, walked back towards Clifton Crescent. "I am appealing to anyone who was in the area of Clifton Crescent at its junction with the Cliftonville Road between 19:30 and 20:30 on Tuesday to contact us," he continued. Mr Murphy also appealed for anyone with CCTV or dash-cam footage to contact police. He said police believed many answers about the murder "lie within the community". "We will work tirelessly to seek justice for his murder to find the answers to his family's many questions," he said. The murder has been widely condemned by political representatives. Sinn Féin MLA Carál Ní Chuilín described the shooting as "shocking" and called for witnesses to speak to police. SDLP councillor Paul McCusker said it was a "senseless and horrific" shooting. Alliance Party councillor Nuala McAllister said police needed as much information as possible to "get to the bottom of this quite gruesome crime". DUP councillor Dale Pankhurst condemned the shooting and said his thoughts were with the victim's family.
Belfast murder: Lone gunman behind killing of Daniel McClean

Laura KuenssbergPolitical editor@bbclaurakon Twitter To get any deal done where there are such clashing views all around, it requires give and take. It feels like a political lifetime since there has been a fundamental dispute in the cabinet, in the Tory party and across Parliament. Theresa May has stubbornly, although understandably, tried to plot a middle course. But that has failed so spectacularly at this stage. Ultimately she may well be left with the same dilemma of which way to tack. It's clear, wide open, in public, that the cabinet is at odds with each other. Just listen to David Gauke and Liam Fox on whether a customs union could be a compromise for example. The answer for her is not suddenly going to emerge from a unified tier of her top team. There are perhaps five or six of the cabinet who would be happy to see that kind of relationship as a way to bring Labour on board. But there is a group of around the same size who would rather see what they describe as a "managed no deal". You may well wonder if that isn't a contradiction in terms. But the principle would be that the UK would pay the divorce bill already agreed and over a two-year period construct a series of side deals on specific issues, rather than try to come up with a whole new comprehensive plan. There are already intense arguments about whether that's remotely realistic. But the overall point is that the prime minister cannot just therefore look to her top colleagues for an immediate solution. Before she decides which way to tack, or how far to budge, she may need to ask herself if the talks she wants to hold with other political parties are occasions when she is really open to ideas - or just ways of managing the political situation. One cabinet minister involved in the talks suggested that many MPs still needed to understand how the agreement they have reached with the EU worked. And that as "project reality" dawned, there could still be a way through of salvaging Mrs May's deal in something like its current form. And certainly there wasn't much in the PM's lectern statement to suggest she is suddenly ready to move very much. One former minister described it as "still flicking the V at the 48% - she's deluded, she never changes her mind and cannot conceive that others might". If all that the prime minister intends to do is massage a few egos with these talks, it seems unlikely that she'll find a quick route to success. And Labour may well stay outside the process. Many members of the public might be furious that Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn won't play nice during a time of crisis. He's always said he believes in dialogue, but when it really matters, he says no. But inside the Labour movement there are others who might accuse of him of helping to make Brexit happen if he takes part. Like so many facets of this process, it's not a straightforward political calculation. But across Parliament, for a very long time now, even some MPs who were on the prime minister's side to start with have been intensely frustrated that she hasn't listened. It will take a lot more than a cup of tea in Downing Street to bring her many critics on board.

Brexit deal: Meetings aren't a Plan B

