Generate an appropriate title for the given text. The generated title must be short and include the main topic of the text. The preferred titles are under fifteen words.

By Zoe KleinmanTechnology reporter, BBC News In Fifa, special players can be bought in packs, but the contents are only revealed after payment is completed. The children's father, Thomas Carter, had bought them a single pack for around £8, and had not realised they had seen how he made the purchase. The Switch has now been confiscated "indefinitely", Mr Carter said. Nintendo has agreed to a full refund and has removed the purchased players. While Fifa is published and sold by Electronic Arts, the payments had been made via the family's Nintendo account. Nintendo did not respond to a request for comment. Mr Carter, from Hampshire, admits that he did not take full precautions to limit access to his Nintendo account: he did not use a unique Pin number and the emailed receipts were sent to an old email address with a full inbox. "I just never thought [the children] would do it," he said. He and his wife only realised what had happened when their card was declined elsewhere because their bank account was empty. Fifa 19 has been certified as suitable for players from the age of three. Mr Carter said his children, who are all under the age of 10, felt very remorseful and had not understood the impact of what they were doing. However, he also said he felt that the in-game concept of buying player packs without knowing what was inside them was unethical. "You pay £40 for the game, which is a lot of money in itself, but then the only way to get a great team is essentially by gambling," he said, referring to online play. "They spent £550 and they still never got their favourite player, Lionel Messi." Video games publisher EA, which owns Fifa, declined to comment but provided a link to its guidelines on controlling in-game purchases - this varies depending on the platform or console being used. How to activate spending controls Some devices are more complicated than others, here's a quick (and not exhaustive) guide: In 2018 the games news website Eurogamer published an interview with an adult Fifa player who discovered he had spent $10,000 (£8,000) in two years, after he issued EA with an information request under the European data law GDPR. He told the site it was "just not worth it". A new report issued by the organisation Internet Matters found that 26% of the 2,000 parents of four to 16-year-olds it spoke to were concerned about the amount of money their children were spending on in-game purchases. Chief executive Carolyn Bunting said it is important for parents to remember to shield their games account passwords or Pin numbers, and also to have regular discussions with children about what is free in games and what costs money. "I'm sure most children won't want to be in a position where they have spent their own parents' money on upgrades or in this case, new players on Fifa," she said. Loot box controversy Last year Belgium banned the sale of video game loot boxes - special characters or rewards which can either be purchased or acquired through game play hours, but cannot be previewed in advance. In June, Kerry Hopkins, the vice president of EA games, told British MPs that the boxes were "quite ethical and fun", comparing them with Kinder Eggs, Hatchimals and LOL Surprise. "We do think the way that we have implemented these kinds of mechanics - and Fifa of course is our big one, our Fifa Ultimate Team and our packs - is actually quite ethical and quite fun, quite enjoyable to people," she said. Prof Andrew Przybylski, director of research at the Oxford Internet Institute, said more data was needed in order to assess the impact of loot box-style purchases. "Loot boxes and in-app purchases present parents with a new frontier of challenges," he told the BBC. "Though loot boxes look like gambling, we won't know what their effects are until these companies start sharing their data with independent scientists. "There isn't good evidence it is gambling, but the very fact we don't have hard data should be a concern."
'The kids emptied our bank account playing Fifa'

Charley-Anne Semple, 27, was at home in Thurrock, Essex, last Friday when she slumped to the floor. Tyler phoned for an ambulance and fetched a neighbour with his sister, Annabella, three, who also has autism. The National Autistic Society said: "It's a fantastic feat for any five-year-old, but even more so for a child on the autism spectrum." 'Poisoned apple' Mrs Semple, who has a pre-existing physical condition, fell unconscious after getting back from a "busy day" with the children. "Tyler told emergency services I was dead and that I had eaten a poisoned apple from an ugly old witch," she said. "They may have thought it was a hoax call, as he just kept repeating the full address and he wasn't answering direct questions. "But I think he told them 'I am Tyler, I have autism', so I think that helped and they could understand him a little bit better." The call operator told Tyler to walk with his sister to a neighbour's house to ask her to sit with them. To add to the drama, the neighbour had to climb through a window after the door slammed shut behind the children. "I'm really proud of both of the children for remaining calm," said Mrs Semple. "My children have proved themselves, that they can cope in this situation. "Tyler struggles with conversing, so to stay on the phone for 10 minutes, give our full address, take instructions - those are all things he finds very difficult." Asked if she thought he had saved her life, she said: "I wasn't exactly critical but you never know, once you are unconscious anything could happen." The National Autistic Society gave Tyler a certificate of bravery and Annabella a "well done" for giving her mother kisses and stroking her hand until paramedics arrived. The charity said: "Many children with autism find it very hard to communicate with people they know, let alone picking up the phone and talking to strangers." The East of England Ambulance Service said Tyler knew exactly what to do and was very brave "in what must have been a very frightening situation for him".
Boy, 5, with autism gets award for 999 call after mum collapsed

By Hannah RichardsonBBC News education reporter University of Oxford researchers say teenagers start functioning properly two hours later than older adults. A trial tracking nearly 32,000 GCSE pupils in more than 100 schools will assess whether a later school start leads to higher grades. Improved mental health and wellbeing could also result, the scientists say. Professor of sleep medicine Colin Espie said: "Our grandparents always told us our sleep is incredibly important. "We have always known that, but it's only recently that we've become engaged in the importance of sleep and circadian rhythm. "We know that something funny happens when new teenagers start to be slightly out of sync with the rest of the world. "Of course, your parents think that's probably because you're a little bit lazy and opinionated, if only you got to bed early at night, then you would be able to get up early in the morning. "But science is telling us, in fact there are developmental changes during the teenage years, which lead to them actually not being as tired as we think they ought to be at normal bedtime and still sleepy in the morning. "What we're doing in the study is exploring the possibility that if we actually delay the school start time until 10am, instead of 9am or earlier, that additional hour taken on a daily dose over the course of a year will actually improve learning, performance, attainment and in the end school leaving qualifications." He added: "If we adapt our system to the biological status of the young person, we might have more success than trying to fit them into our schedules." Prof Russell Foster, director of sleep and circadian neuroscience at Oxford University, said that getting a teenager to start their day at 07:00 is like an adult starting theirs at 05:00. 'Results boost' He also highlighted the results of a small trial at Monkseaton High School in North Tyneside where school start times were shifted from 08:50 to 10:00. This led to an increase in the percentage of pupils getting five good GCSEs from about 34% to about 50%. Among disadvantaged pupils, the increase had been from about 19% to about 43%, he said. Now in the wider, year-long study starting next September, Year 10 and 11 pupils at more than 100 schools will be divided into two groups, with one starting school at 10:00, and the other following the usual school timetable. Both sets of pupils will also be given education on the importance of getting enough sleep. Pupils' results will be assessed before the trial and at the end, and comparisons drawn between the late start and normal start time groups. Some pupils will be fitted with non-invasive bio-telemetric monitoring devices recording their sleep-wake patterns. Analysis of these results will be fed into the study as well. The study is one of six projects funded by £4m from the Education Endowment Foundation and science charity the Wellcome Trust, looking at how the application of neuroscience can improve teaching and learning in schools. Education Endowment Foundation chief executive Kevan Collins said: "We're delighted to be researching these cutting-edge strategies based on the latest knowledge in neuroscience."

Later school start time 'may boost GCSE results'

