What is the debate topic for the following sentences?

1. Not only will this undermine the polices ability to supervise and regulate individuals democratic rights , it will also have an impact on the perspective that ordinary people adopt in relation to the state .
2. Even if the officer expressly adopts a neutral stance , personal ideological bias may still lead him to perceive a demonstration by his friends and allies as inherently less threatening or in need of oversight than a protest mounted by another organisation .
3. Part of the states role is to balance these sets of incommensurate rights .
4. Doing so ensures that citizens who do not want to be involved in , or whose activities and freedoms might be materially affected by the articulation of extremist views can go about their business without hindrance .
5. Although the state does not have a right to obstruct or prevent such organisations from meeting or protesting , it does have a right to control the manner and circumstances in which such meetings take place .
6. It is often unclear whether extremist political organisations are likely to become violent or to engage in provocative acts of hate speech .
7. If such a situation was to arise , the capability of the officer to make appropriately impartial , value neutral decisions about the types of activity that would be permitted at such a demonstration might be compromised .
8. A police officer with links to an extremist party may , conceivably , be made responsible for policing the conduct of friends and political allies .
9. It is possible that a conflict of interest could arise between the political views of a police officer or a state solicitor responsible for overseeing the circumstances in which a rally or gathering will take place and the balancing role of the state .
10. All western liberal democracies use their police forces to enforce this balance .
This House would ban government employees from joining extremist political parties