Sentences: 1. Even without admitting it because international law is based upon state behaviour the use of force is legal as Michael J Glennon suggests The consent of United Nations member states to the general prohibition against the use of force , as expressed in the Charter , has in this way been supplanted by a changed intent as expressed in deeds .
2. Glennon , Michael J. , How War Left the Law Behind , , 21 November 2002 ,
3. In each instance of unilateral offensive action there will be justifications and a smoke screen to make the conflict appear to be legal when in fact it is not .
4. Major powers should simply admit that they do not regard the prohibition of the use of force as binding on them .
5. The international prohibition on the use of force has always been honoured in large part in the breach leading to the question of whether it should really be considered to be binding international law at all .
6. Almost every major country has launched an illegal offensive action at some point ; The USA has been involved in Kosovo and Iraq , the UK and France in attacking Egypt in 1953 , China in attacking Vietnam in 1979 , and Russia -LRB- as the USSR -RRB- in attacking Afghanistan also in 1979 .

What claim can be made from these sentences?
Current International law on the use of force no longer matters