Given a document, an entity and its sentiment towards the entity, verify if it is the correct sentiment towards the entity. Answer should be yes or no. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].
One example: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Bill Clinton is Positive . Bill Clinton knows how to win friends and influence people. The former president is a master of reinvention — and the same talents that guided him into office have propelled him, more recently, into the stratosphere of Internet stardom.
Solution is here: yes
Explanation: Here the author of the document praises Bill for this ability to win friends. Hence the sentiment should be Positive and the answer is yes.

Now, solve this: Verify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Bannon is Positive . Former White House chief strategist Steve Bannon  told congressional investigators that the controversial June 2016 Trump Tower meeting between Trump campaign officials and a Russian lawyer promising dirt on Hillary Clinton was “unpatriotic ” an acknowledgement of comments  he ’s tried to publicly distance  himself  from  according to sources familiar with  his  closed-door testimony before the House Intelligence Committee earlier this week.
Bannon  according to “Fire and Fury: Inside the Trump White House” by Michael Wolff  said the meeting attended by Donald Trump Jr.  Jared Kushner and then campaign chairman Paul Manafort was “treasonous” and “unpatriotic."
“Even if you thought that this was not treasonous  or unpatriotic  or bad sh--  and I happen to think it’s all of that  you should have called the FBI immediately  ” Bannon  said  according to Wolff.
 He  later attempted to walk back the comments  which reportedly angered President Trump  saying in a statement that the eldest Trump son “is both a patriot and a good man ” and that the “treasonous” comments were directed at Manafort.
Two sources familiar with  Bannon ’s congressional appearance tell ABC News that  Bannon  stood by  his  description of the meeting as “unpatriotic ” but told lawmakers  his  initial description of the meeting as “treasonous” was exaggerated.
A third source familiar with  Bannon ’s interview told ABC News that  Bannon ’s characterization of the meeting as “unpatriotic” behind closed doors was only a reference to Manafort  not Trump Jr. or Kushner.
 Bannon  only said that the meeting “displayed poor judgment” on the part of Trump Jr. and Kushner  but was “excusable because they were newcomers to political campaigns ” the source said.
 Bannon  also told the committee  he  was speculating when  he  suggested to Wolff that it was likely that Trump Jr. brought the Russian lawyer and other individuals in the meeting to meet with Donald Trump in Trump Tower  according to two sources.
"The chance that Don Jr did not walk these jumos up to his father's office on the twenty-sixth floor is zero ”  Bannon  told Wolff.
Sources familiar with  Bannon 's interview said  he  also told the committee that  he  had communicated with former White House chief of staff Reince Priebus  press secretary Sean Spicer and Mark Corallo  the former spokesman for the president’s legal team  about the Trump Tower meeting after the New York Times broke the news of the meeting in July of 2017.  Bannon ’s comments to the committee about these conversations were first reported by Axios.
 Bannon  is expected back before the committee later this month after  he  refused to answer questions about  his  time working for Trump during the transition and in the Oval Office.
 Bannon  did not respond to a request for comment.
Solution:
yes