Question:
Based on the premise "Why not simply magic the entire construction, whatever it was to be?", can we conclude that "Magic had a risk to it, and that risk was to be avoided. "? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
it is not possible to tell


Question: Sentence A: After all, if you think the person can't make it, why hire him in the first place?

Sentence B: Why hire the person if you think they won't be successful.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes


Question: I knew perfectly that she was a bad lot when I went there as a matter of fact that's WHY I went  " She broke off, seeing some 92 bewilderment on the lawyer's face, and went on: "I think perhaps I'd better tell you the whole story, Sir James.
She said to Sir James "I should tell you the whole story", upon seeing the lawyers surprise.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes


Problem: Here is a premise:
As an economic matter, it is clear that a postal service is better off having a customer at a near-cost price than not having the customer at all.

Here is a hypothesis:
It's better if, from an economic point of view, a postal service doesn't have a customer at all.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no


Sentence 1: The most hallowed room commemorates Cuba's 19th-century independence wars, with the very first Cuban flag and venerated personal objects from generals of the day.

Sentence 2: There is no room that commemorates Cuba's 19th-century independence wars.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: no


Premise:
"For individual taxpayers, tax incentives increase the after-tax return on saving for particular purposes or on specific types of assets accumulated."
Hypothesis: For individuals, tax incentives incresse their tax return saving on specific assets accumulated 
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no


yes