Definition: In this task, you are given a text of many news articles seperated by special token "|||||". Your task is to summarize them.
Input: CLEVELAND, Ohio -- The city of Cleveland has agreed to pay Tamir Rice's family $6 million to settle a federal lawsuit filed over the boy's November 2014 shooting death by city police. 
  
 The settlement announced Monday does not resolve all of the lingering legal issues surrounding the 12-year-old's killing. However, it is a sign that both the city and the boy's family did not want to endure what could be tension-filled and expensive litigation process that could last years. 
  
 The settlement was revealed via a court filing from U.S. District Judge Dan Polster, who presided over settlement talks. 
  
 Tamir Rice's estate will receive $5.5 million, Samaria Rice, the boy's mother, and his sister Tajai Rice will each receive $250,000. Neither the city, officers Timothy Loehmann and Frank Garmback nor dispatchers involved will admit to any wrongdoing. The city will pay $3 million this year and $3 million in 2017. 
  
 (You can read the court filing here or at the bottom of this story.) 
  
 The agreement must be approved by a Cuyahoga County Probate Court judge before it is final. 
  
 Monday's settlement is likely the largest the city has ever paid for a police-shooting case. 
  
 However, the amount the family will receive is in line with amounts paid in other high profile police use-of-force cases nationally in the past year. For example, the city of Chicago in 2015 paid $5 million to the family of Laquan McDonald before a lawsuit was even filed over his police shooting death. 
  
 And the city of Baltimore agreed to pay $6.4 million to the family of Freddie Gray, whose neck was broken in a police van in April 2015. 
  
 Click here to see how the Tamir Rice settlement compares to similar cases across the nation. 
  
 Attorneys representing the Rice family say that while the settlement is "historic in financial terms, no amount of money can adequately compensate for the loss of a life." 
  
 The statement continues, "in a situation such as this, there is no such thing as closure or justice. Nothing will bring Tamir back. His unnecessary and premature death leaves a gaping hole for those who knew and loved him that can never be filled." 
  
 Mayor Frank Jackson, in a news conference held Monday afternoon, said that the settlement, nor the case as a whole, is an easy one to deal with. 
  
 "And I can't speak to how difficult it must have been for the family of Tamir Rice," Jackson said. I can't even speak to that, because it's hard for me to imagine how I would feel and behave at that time. ... At the end of the day, a 12-year old child lost their life, and that should not have happened in the city of Cleveland. It should not have happened." 
  
 An attorney the city hired to represent Loehmann and Garmback said in a statement that both officers maintain that they believe their actions were "legally reasonable," but that they "recognize the value of early legal resolution to allow some healing to begin." 
  
 And Steve Loomis, president of the Cleveland Police Patrolman's Association, said that he hoped some of the money from the settlement will be used to educate children about the use of look-alike firearms. 
  
 Loehmann and Garmback were the first officers to respond to a report of a "guy" pointing a gun at people outside the Cudell Recreation Center on West Boulevard. Loehmann shot the boy within seconds of arriving. 
  
 Loehmann would later say that he feared for his life and that he thought Tamir was reaching for the gun tucked in his waistband that was later revealed to be an airsoft pellet gun with the orange safety tip removed. 
  
 Tamir died Nov. 23, 2014, the day after the shooting, and the lawsuit was filed two weeks after his death. The family and the city agreed in March to enter settlement talks. 
  
 The shooting caused near-instantaneous outrage and was seen by many as just one of several examples of police in Cleveland and across the country using too much force when responding to calls involving black residents. Those views were later backed up by a scathing U.S. Justice Department report. 
  
 The Cuyahoga County Sheriff's Department conducted a criminal investigation against Loehmann and Garmback. A grand jury, following a recommendation from Prosecutor Timothy J. McGinty, declined to hand up charges against either officer. That recommendation is likely the reason that McGinty lost his re-election in the March primary. 
  
 But while the criminal investigation against Loehmann and Garmback was more narrow and focused on their actions immediately leading up to the shooting, the lawsuit was broad. It called into question the actions of the dispatchers who first put out the call about a disturbance at Cudell. 
  
 It also had claims against Lt. Gail Bindel and Sgt. Edwin Santiago, who helped to hire Loehmann in 2014 despite the then-cadet having a poor track record with Independence police. 
  
 The U.S. Department of Justice is conducting a review of the case to see either officer violated any federal civil-rights laws. However, such reviews rarely yield criminal charges. 
  
 Both officers are also under internal investigation by the police department. 
  
 In an interview Monday, Rice family attorney Subodh Chandra said the settlement is cold comfort for Tamir's family, who feel robbed of a fair grand jury review of the boy's slaying. 
  
 "They lost a child," Chandra said. "And they also feel, correctly, that they were cheated out of a fair criminal justice process. ... If the process had been fair, the family would have been willing to accept whatever result came out of it. But because it was so transparently unfair, it's just hard for them. There is no justice here, and they will never have their beloved child back." 
  
 Reporter Leila Atassi contributed to this story. 
  
 Updated with references to other police use-of-force settlements, as well as comments from attorneys and the city. 
  
 If you want to comment on this story, visit Monday's crime and courts comments page. ||||| (CNN) The city of Cleveland will pay $6 million to settle the federal lawsuit filed by the family of Tamir Rice, the 12-year-old boy killed by police gunfire in November 2014, according to a settlement announced Monday in U.S. District Court. 
  
 According to terms of the settlement, the city acknowledges no fault in Tamir's death, which came after a 911 caller told of someone in a city park brandishing what appeared to be a toy gun. 
  
 Officer Timothy Loehmann, a trainee, shot Tamir moments after arriving in response to the call. Police said the boy was pulling out what was later found to be a toy gun when he was shot. 
  
 In December, a grand jury declined to indict Loehmann or his trainer, Officer Frank Garmback, in Tamir's death. The grand jury concluded the shooting was a "perfect storm of human error, mistakes and communications" but not a criminal act, prosecutor Tim McGinty said at the time. 
  
 The family said dispatchers should have told officers about a 911 caller's statements that the gun Tamir had was likely a toy, that officers approached the scene too aggressively and Loehmann fired too quickly, and that they failed to help the boy after he was shot. 
  
 JUST WATCHED Enhanced video of Tamir Rice shooting released Replay More Videos ... MUST WATCH Enhanced video of Tamir Rice shooting released 00:55 
  
 The family also alleged that Loehmann wasn't suited to be a police officer and that the city failed to vet or supervise officers properly. 
  
 In response , the city said in legal filings that Tamir was at fault and maintained the city was entitled to immunity under state and federal law. 
  
 Mayor Frank Jackson later apologized for the wording , calling it hurtful and disrespectful. 
  
 On Monday, Jackson addressed reporters on the settlement, declining to offer details about how the agreement was reached and expressing hope the settlement would begin to move the city toward closure. 
  
 But he said, "There is no price that you can put on the life, on the loss, of a 12-year-old child." 
  
 The city will pay half of the money this year, and half next year, according to a document filed in court. 
  
 The Cleveland Police Patrolman's Association responded with a statement. "We have maintained from the onset this has been an absolute tragedy for the Rice family as well as our involved officers and their families. Our hearts continue to be with them," Stephen Loomis, the president of the association, said in a short emailed statement. 
  
 "We can only hope the Rice family and their attorneys will use a portion of this settlement to help educate the youth of Cleveland in the dangers associated with the mishandling of both real and facsimile firearms. Something positive must come from this tragic loss. That would be educating youth of the dangers of possessing a real or replica firearm. 
  
 "We look forward to the possibility of working with the Rice family to achieve this common goal." 
  
 A probate judge must still approve the settlement, according to the document. |||||
Output:
The city of Cleveland will pay the family of Tamir Rice $6 million over the boy's fatal shooting in 2014, reports CNN. The payment settles a federal lawsuit filed by the family after a trainee police officer shot and killed Tamir at a city park. Under the settlement—Tamir's estate gets $5.5 million, and his mother and sister get $250,000 apiece—the city admits no wrongdoing. The payout is in line with similar cases, notes Cleveland.com, including the $5 million paid by Chicago over the Laquan McDonald shooting and the $6.4 million paid by Baltimore in the Freddie Gray shooting. While the settlement is "historic in financial terms, no amount of money can adequately compensate for the loss of a life," say the Rice family attorneys in a statement. "In a situation such as this, there is no such thing as closure or justice. Nothing will bring Tamir back." The settlement doesn't resolve all the legal issues in the shooting. The Justice Department is investigating whether police violated Tamir's civil rights, though such cases are rarely brought because the threshold of proof is so high.