You need to read the given passage and construct a question about the information present in the passage. The question should be answerable from the passage. Most importantly, only those questions are allowed whose answers cannot be determined from a single sentence. Do not generate questions that require only a single sentence to answer. Instead, try to combine two sentences and create a question from that combination. Do not create open-ended questions, i.e., the answers to them cannot be found precisely from the information provided in the passage.
One example: Paragraph- Sent 1: A Republican bid to keep the government open past Friday includes no new money for the construction of a border wall along the U.S.-Mexico border, according to several congressional aides familiar with ongoing talks.
Sent 2: GOP leaders submitted the new offer Tuesday afternoon in an effort to appease Democrats, whose votes are needed to avert a shutdown of federal agencies, several House and Senate aides said.
Sent 3: However, Republicans also insisted on increases in border security and defense spending, including money to repair existing fencing and new surveillance technology to patrol the nearly 2,000-mile border.
Sent 4: Democrats have indicated that they would support such appropriations so long as no money goes toward an actual wall.
Solution is here: Who has to be appeased to keep the government open?
Explanation: This is a good multi-sentence question because, "appease Democrats" is mentioned in Sent 2, while "keep the government open" is part of Sent 1. As this question requires more than one sentences to answer, it's a good question.

Now, solve this: Paragraph- Sent 1: As a husband, father and tenant of a Grand Rapids public housing complex, Aubrey Robertson puts security at the top of his home priority list.
Sent 2: Because of that, Robertson is all for a zero-tolerance drug law in force at Creston Plaza apartments on Grand Rapids' Northeast Side.
Sent 3: That includes cases in which families may be evicted for the drug use of a single family member, even off the premises.
Sent 4: Robertson sees it as a tool to keep his complex as clean and safe as possible.
Sent 5: "If there's one person (using drugs), that is a start," said Robertson, 52, a native of Jamaica.
Sent 6: He has lived the past four years at Creston Plaza with his wife, Tammy, and his daughter, Precious, 3.
Sent 7: In recent months, Robertson was pleased to see casual drug use at the complex diminish with the installation of security cameras.
Sent 8: "If there is a start, then there will be some other problem.
Sent 9: I totally agree (if there is a drug link), get them out."Sent 10: Critics say the law -- argued Tuesday before the U.S. Supreme Court -- tramples on individual rights and harms the very people public housing authorities are supposed to help.
Sent 11: "It's basically one strike and you're out, and I think they went beyond what Congress intended," said Michael Chielens, executive director of Western Michigan Legal Services.
Sent 12: "Someone who had no knowledge or involvement in a criminal act is being punished.
Sent 13: That's kind of a basic due process notion that we have had in our legal tradition for a long time."Sent 14: The case was brought by four Oakland, Calif., senior citizens, including 63-year-old great-grandmother Pearlie Rucker.
Sent 15: They received eviction notices because of the drug use of relatives or caregivers.
Sent 16: Rucker was ordered out because her mentally disabled daughter was caught with cocaine three blocks from the apartment she shared with her mother and other family members, court records show.
Sent 17: An appeals court blocked enforcement of the law.
Sent 18: At issue is whether housing directors are being more aggressive than Congress intended.
Solution:
What does Michael Chielens think of the way in which due process is handled by the current enforcement of this law?