Question: What claim can be made from the following pieces of evidence?
1. Terrorism is part of the modern world and is inextricably linked with the rise of modern communications , the internet , and a global community .
2. This is an age in which space and time are bending to the tune of new media information at your fingertips may sound nice , but for those who want to destroy , it only makes their object easier to attain .
3. And so more strict national security measures must be employed in order to keep up with the enemy .
4. Escalation is the name of the game imposed on governments around the world by terrorists for example the Mumbai terrorists used GPS systems to guide them into Mumbai , attacks were coordinated on cell and satellite phones and Blackberrys were used to monitor the international reaction .
5. In order to keep up states need new powers to stop , deter , and prevent terrorism .
6. The government needs to secure state-security first ; only then can the debate on civil liberties begin , and only then .

Claim: National security is something that must be protected even at the cost of civil liberties.


Question: What claim can be made from the following pieces of evidence?
1. For example students struggle even with their own grammar so an emphasis on making themselves understood rather than correct grammar may be more useful .
2. Therefore , the antidote is more modern learning styles ; there are some quick fixes that can be made when adaptations are needed .
3. Languages should not be abandoned when students find them boring rather the curriculum and methods of teaching need to be changed to make the learning more interesting and more relevant .
4. The problems students face when learning languages are the fault of teaching methods , not language ability .
5. Madeline Ehrman observes that the root of this problem is that the student is out of sync with the methodology , the teacher .

Claim: The solution is more teaching of languages not less.


Question: What claim can be made from the following pieces of evidence?
1. Given that NATO members will defend one another , and that Three NATO membersthe United States , Britain and France - between them deploy more than 10,000 nuclear weapons , conventional wars are extremely unlikely .
2. As professor Kenneth Waltz argues , Wars can be fought in the face of deterrent threats , but the higher the stakes and the closer a country moves toward winning them , the more surely that country invites retaliation and risks its own destruction .
3. States are not likely to run major risks for minor gains .
4. No likely aggressor is likely to be able to make such gains against Europe as to make the risk of nuclear war worth the risk .

Claim: Countries with nuclear weapons or allied to nuclear-armed states do not need as many conventional forces.


Question: What claim can be made from the following pieces of evidence?
1. Studies on the ban of advertisements show that bans actually contribute great amounts to the reduction of smokers .
2. `` The tobacco industry employs predatory marketing strategies to get young people hooked to their addictive drug , '' said Dr Douglas Bettcher , Director of WHO 's Tobacco Free Initiative .
3. A ban or high restrictions is a good measure to diminish the effects of smoking in society , because unlike the spreading of information -LRB- which is usually done by schools / clubs -RRB- , governmental restrictions or a total ban will ensure the access of measures to the whole population .
4. Through a ban on advertisement or higher taxation those citizens not involved in active educational structures get educated about the problem .
5. `` But comprehensive advertising bans do work , reducing tobacco consumption by up to 16 % in countries that have already taken this legislative step . ''
6. So because these measures can drastically decrease smoking when other measures have failed , the state is right to impose bans on advertisement , higher prices or any other measures .

Claim:
Restrictions reach out to the general population