PROBLEM: Claim: State help should be dependent on attendance of classes.
What evidence supports this claim?

EVIDENCE: 1. Parenting classes would be instrumental in ensuring that people reflect upon their decision to have children and understand the implications of their choice.Moreover , if the lifestyle choice of having children is supported by the state -LRB- through tax breaks , benefits and entitlements -RRB- , then it would seem that the state is justified in applying some minimal conditions to people who wish to benefit from its support .
2. In our times , when contraception is widely available and affordable , reproduction should be an active and responsible choice on the part of individuals .
3. 1 . .
4. So parenting classes would be a means for the state to safeguard its interest in having responsible citizens .


PROBLEM: Claim: An independent Tibet would serve as a buffer state between India and China, reducing the chances of a regional clash
What evidence supports this claim?

EVIDENCE: 1. An independent Tibet would serve a useful purpose as a neutral and demilitarized buffer state between India and China .
2. Given the rising economic and military clout of both powers , a future conflict is becoming ever more likely , and they already fought one war against one another in 1962 .
3. An independent Tibet would mean that the two nations would no longer have a common border , making their rivalry less practical and far less pressing .
4. This would reduce military obligations for both , and prevent the Tibetans from being caught in the middle of a future conflict .


PROBLEM: Claim: The character of every act depends upon the circumstances in which it is done
What evidence supports this claim?

EVIDENCE: 1. On that basis , restrictions can be placed on how tobacco products may be advertised , and people may be prevented from promoting illegal and fraudulent tax advice .
2. Likewise , in the US -LRB- and many other countries -RRB- there is no protection for false commercial speech -LRB- i.e. misrepresentation -RRB- and the contents of adverts can be regulated in order to ensure that they are truthful and do not deceive consumers .
3. Shouting fire in a crowded cinema when there is no fire , and you know it , is wrong because doing so creates a clear and present danger of harm to others .
4. `` The most stringent protection of free speech would not protect a man in falsely shouting fire in a theatre and causing a panic . ''


PROBLEM: Claim: The apparent loss of liberty is overstated.
What evidence supports this claim?

EVIDENCE:
1. Nonetheless it is not a good idea to shut down all security measures under a pretext that they violate rights .
2. The majority of the measures are intended to safeguard those civil liberties instead of abusing them .
3. For example in the UK terrorism suspects were originally detained without charge under the Anti-Terrorism , Crime and Security Act however the detention was declared unlawful by the law lords in 2005 so the government introduced new scaled back policies such as control orders .
4. Therefore government has always been willing to scale back its security legislation when the courts believe it goes too far .
5. Negative cases of security abuse are few and have been greatly exaggerated by an emphatic civil rights lobby that has no empathy for the victims of terrorism .
6. Of course , with any wide-scale attempt to fight terrorism there are bound to be a few cases of abuse of security measures .