Instructions: In this task, you will be presented with a passage, and you need to write an **implausible** answer to to fill in the place of "_". Your answer should be incorrect, but should not be out of context. Try using words that are related to the context of the passage, but are not the correct answer.  Even though there exist multiple wrong answers, we only need a single wrong answer.
Input: A terror-sympathiser linked to hate preacher Abu Qatada has been granted the right to live in the UK despite earlier being branded a risk to national security. The Moroccan-born 56-year-old holds joint French and Algerian nationality but is married to a British woman. However, he was excluded from the country on August 25, 2005 as he represented 'a sufficiently serious threat' to public safety. The father-of-eight, known only as ZZ, previously admitted having sympathy for banned Algerian terror group the GIA - but has had a decision banning him from the UK overturned after citing the Human Rights Act. According to judgement from the Special Immigration Appeals Commission, ZZ 'was not frank' about trips he made to the continent as a GIA activist.The terror sympathiser known only as ZZ was barred from the UK in 2005He tried to sneak into the country on a fake Belgian passport in 2009An appeals tribunal found that much of ZZ's evidence 'lacked credibility'Despite his alleged past, ZZ is no longer regarded a security risk 
 Question:The report said: 'Until at least 1996, the appellant maintained an association with _ , including reasonably close contact , and at least some sympathy of ideas.
Output:
UK