Generate an appropriate title for the given text. The generated title must be short and include the main topic of the text. The preferred titles are under fifteen words.
One example is below.
Q: But Eluned Morgan conceded that it would be "difficult for us to stop" from a legal point of view. Her comments were criticised by a Labour AM. Alun Davies said threatening legal action "sounds like the last breath before you're thrown out of the pub". Mr Davies said he was not convinced the Welsh Government would "have a leg to stand on" in trying to shape international trade deals after Brexit. Following Donald Trump's comments during last week's trade visit that the NHS would be "on the table" in any future trade talks between the UK and the USA, Eluned Morgan said there was "absolutely no prospect whatsoever of us allowing the Welsh NHS to be part of any negotiation." The US President then rowed back on his initial comments following criticism from a number of MPs. Asked about her response to President Trump's remarks as she gave evidence to the Assembly's Brexit committee on Monday, Ms Morgan said "legally, it would be difficult for us to stop because we don't have a veto over trade". "Politically, I think it's extremely unlikely to happen," the international relations and the Welsh language minister said. "They [the UK Government] should not be concluding any trade agreements without consulting us where we have the power." Ms Morgan explained that UK and Welsh government officials are working on an agreement or 'concordat' for how future trade deals are negotiated. During a robust exchange, the Labour AM Alun Davies said: "I want something which is in law to which I can hold you to account and which colleagues in Westminster can hold the UK Government to account. "The argument we'll make life difficult for them, it sounds alright on the street, but it's not the reality of intergovernmental relations." "The United Kingdom has to find a way of functioning. "At the moment, your answers aren't giving me any confidence that there is that structure in place because, if the Welsh Government's argument is, 'we'll see you in court', it's not a very impressive argument either for the continuation of the structure of United Kingdom as a state or the commitment of the government within the United Kingdom to actually work together," he added. Responding to the criticism, Ms Morgan said: "Is the current intergovernmental structure adequate? "Absolutely not... and it's not just in relation to trade, it's in relation to almost every aspect of government policy. So, that infrastructure needs to be built."
A: NHS Wales: Court action if trade deals affect service?
Rationale: The output phrase is the appropriate title for the given text and it highlights the essence of the passage.
Q: Ann Barnes's car collided with another car and then hit a tree in September. The Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC) said the "PCC may have committed the offence of driving without insurance" and passed the case to the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS). Mrs Barnes said she was insured and the CPS was not pursuing the matter. The IPCC said: "It was the IPCC's opinion that the PCC may have committed the offence of driving without insurance when she was involved in a road traffic collision on 16 September 2014, and on a number of occasions in the six months before." Mrs Barnes said: "I have always maintained that so far as I was concerned, when my car was struck I was appropriately insured. The insurance company has paid on the claim." Her Mercedes collided with another car and hit a tree in Princes Road, Dartford. Nobody was seriously hurt. 'Business or pleasure' The CPS said the allegation of driving without insurance was based on a journey between a shop and a meeting during which the crash happened. A spokesman said the case was "technical in nature" and focused on whether the purpose of the journey was for business or pleasure. "We would consider that far from clear," he said. "[We] were not provided with sufficient evidence that Ann Barnes drove the relevant vehicle on any other relevant occasion, which would be fundamental to considering the matter in terms of alleged criminality. "We consider that it would not be in the public interest to prosecute." The IPCC said it had not referred to the CPS an allegation that Mrs Barnes had obstructed a police officer while inquiries into her insurance cover were being made by Kent Police. An IPCC spokesman said the there had been insufficient evidence.
A:
Kent PCC Ann Barnes 'may not have been insured' in car crash