Q: A: uh, but then when you quantify things and might also hold criminal trials for how many years is appropriate, uh, that they might leave it to somebody else who, uh, has expertise in that. B: Right, I agree, too. I don't think the jury should be the ones that put the sentencings down.
the jury should be the ones that put the sentencings down
OPTIONS:
- Yes
- No
- It's impossible to say
A: No
it was his fault
OPTIONS:
- Yes
- No
- It's impossible to say
So, is the hypothesis above true, given the following?
B: but I found that, uh, it was made of some material which actually ended up rusting uh, after, A: Oh. B: even, despite, you know, diligent washing, it got rusty after about, uh, three weeks of use. And I don't think it was my fault because you know, I had made a point of like drying it off and cleaning it

Answer: No
QUESTION: Context:

The Susweca. It means ``dragonfly'' in Sioux, you know. Did I ever tell you that's where Paul and I met?

Hypothesis: Susweca is where she and Paul met
OPTIONS:
- Yes
- No
- It's impossible to say

ANS: Yes
Read the text and determine if the sentence is true:

A: but at the same time I think it would do them a world of good. B: Yeah. A: But there's a, B: I don't know that you could require everyone yeah, to do it for a whole year, or two years or something like that,

Sentence: speaker A could require everyone to do it for a whole year
OPTIONS:
- Yes
- No
- It's impossible to say

A: No
Input: Read the following paragraph and determine if the hypothesis is true: A: Um, yeah, I guess that's not an easy solution. there's no easy solution for that. B: Uh-huh.  I don't know that there is an easy solution, but if you could find a way to prevent some of it, and I'm not sure what it would be. It would be money better spent than, A: Uh-huh. B: do you know it costs more to keep an inmate on death row than it does to send a kid to Harvard?
Hypothesis: it costs more to keep an inmate on death row that it does to send a kid of Harvard
OPTIONS:
- Yes
- No
- It's impossible to say
Output: Yes
Q: B: Uh, with regard uh, to jury trials. I really feel as though, uh, uh, whatever system has been used historically, in particular jurisdiction, you know, is really the only kinds of things that you can use. Because the jurisprudence is, you know, based uh, you know, on accumulated body of law. And if you have a situation where you change that body of law, then all of sudden they could start going back and digging up all these cases uh, that would be handled differently were they judged by today's standards. So I really don't think they can really do much of anything to change it.
they can really do something to change it
OPTIONS:
- Yes
- No
- It's impossible to say
A:
No