You need to read the given passage and construct a question about the information present in the passage. The question should be answerable from the passage. Most importantly, only those questions are allowed whose answers cannot be determined from a single sentence. Do not generate questions that require only a single sentence to answer. Instead, try to combine two sentences and create a question from that combination. Do not create open-ended questions, i.e., the answers to them cannot be found precisely from the information provided in the passage.
One example: Paragraph- Sent 1: A Republican bid to keep the government open past Friday includes no new money for the construction of a border wall along the U.S.-Mexico border, according to several congressional aides familiar with ongoing talks.
Sent 2: GOP leaders submitted the new offer Tuesday afternoon in an effort to appease Democrats, whose votes are needed to avert a shutdown of federal agencies, several House and Senate aides said.
Sent 3: However, Republicans also insisted on increases in border security and defense spending, including money to repair existing fencing and new surveillance technology to patrol the nearly 2,000-mile border.
Sent 4: Democrats have indicated that they would support such appropriations so long as no money goes toward an actual wall.
Solution is here: Who has to be appeased to keep the government open?
Explanation: This is a good multi-sentence question because, "appease Democrats" is mentioned in Sent 2, while "keep the government open" is part of Sent 1. As this question requires more than one sentences to answer, it's a good question.

Now, solve this: Paragraph- Sent 1:   From a curious scholar's lore he drew fantastics with which to torment his victim.
Sent 2: We heard of all the witches, warlocks, incubi, succibi, harpies, devils, imps, and haunters of Avitchi, from all the teachings of history, sacred and profane, Hindu, Egyptian, Greek, mediaeval, Swedenborg, Rosicrucian, theosophy, theology, with every last ounce of horror, mystery, shivers, and creeps squeezed out of them.
Sent 3: They were gorgeous ghost stories, for they were told by a man fully informed as to all the legendary and gruesome details.
Sent 4: At first I used to think he might have communicated it more effectively.
Sent 5: Then I saw that the cool, drawling manner, the level voice, were in reality the highest art.
Sent 6: He told his stories in a half-amused, detached manner which imposed confidence more readily than any amount of earnest asseveration.
Sent 7: The mere fact of his own belief in what he said came to matter little.
Sent 8: He was the vehicle by which was brought accurate knowledge.
Sent 9: He had read all these things, and now reported them as he had read: each man could decide for himself as to their credibility.
Solution:
How does the narrator's opinion of the storyteller change?