You need to read the given passage and construct a question about the information present in the passage. The question should be answerable from the passage. Most importantly, only those questions are allowed whose answers cannot be determined from a single sentence. Do not generate questions that require only a single sentence to answer. Instead, try to combine two sentences and create a question from that combination. Do not create open-ended questions, i.e., the answers to them cannot be found precisely from the information provided in the passage.
One example: Paragraph- Sent 1: A Republican bid to keep the government open past Friday includes no new money for the construction of a border wall along the U.S.-Mexico border, according to several congressional aides familiar with ongoing talks.
Sent 2: GOP leaders submitted the new offer Tuesday afternoon in an effort to appease Democrats, whose votes are needed to avert a shutdown of federal agencies, several House and Senate aides said.
Sent 3: However, Republicans also insisted on increases in border security and defense spending, including money to repair existing fencing and new surveillance technology to patrol the nearly 2,000-mile border.
Sent 4: Democrats have indicated that they would support such appropriations so long as no money goes toward an actual wall.
Solution is here: Who has to be appeased to keep the government open?
Explanation: This is a good multi-sentence question because, "appease Democrats" is mentioned in Sent 2, while "keep the government open" is part of Sent 1. As this question requires more than one sentences to answer, it's a good question.

Now, solve this: Paragraph- Sent 1: The Bush administration immediately encountered the dilemmas that arose from the varied objectives the United States was trying to accom plish in its relationship with Pakistan.
Sent 2: In February 2001, President Bush wrote General Musharraf on a number of matters.
Sent 3: He emphasized that Bin Ladin and al Qaeda were "a direct threat to the United States and its interests that must be addressed."Sent 4: He urged Musharraf to use his influence with the Taliban on Bin Ladin and al Qaeda.
Sent 5: Powell and Armitage reviewed the possibility of acquiring more carrots to dangle in front of Pakistan.
Sent 6: Given the generally negative view of Pakistan on Capitol Hill, the idea of lifting sanctions may have seemed far-fetched, but perhaps no more so than the idea of persuading Musharraf to antagonize the Islamists in his own government and nation.
Sent 7: On June 18, Rice met with the visiting Pakistani foreign minister, Abdul Sattar.
Sent 8: She "really let him have it" about al Qaeda, she told us.
Sent 9: Other evidence corroborates her account.
Sent 10: But, as she was upbraiding Sattar, Rice recalled thinking that the Pakistani diplomat seemed to have heard it all before.
Sent 11: Sattar urged senior U.S. policymakers to engage the Taliban, arguing that such a course would take time but would produce results.
Sent 12: In late June, the deputies agreed to review U.S. objectives.
Sent 13: Clarke urged Hadley to split off all other issues in U.S.-Pakistani relations and just focus on demanding that Pakistan move vigorously against terrorism-to push the Pakistanis to do before an al Qaeda attack what Washington would demand that they do after.
Sent 14: He had made similar requests in the Clinton administration; he had no more success with Rice than he had with Berger.
Sent 15: On August 4, President Bush wrote President Musharraf to request his support in dealing with terrorism and to urge Pakistan to engage actively against al Qaeda.
Sent 16: The new administration was again registering its concerns, just as its predecessor had, but it was still searching for new incentives to open up diplomatic possibilities.
Sent 17: For its part, Pakistan had done little.
Sent 18: Assistant Secretary of State Christina Rocca described the administration's plan to break this logjam as a move from "half engagement" to "enhanced engagement.".
Solution:
Who considered lifting sanctions already in place against Pakistan?