You need to read the given passage and construct a question about the information present in the passage. The question should be answerable from the passage. Most importantly, only those questions are allowed whose answers cannot be determined from a single sentence. Do not generate questions that require only a single sentence to answer. Instead, try to combine two sentences and create a question from that combination. Do not create open-ended questions, i.e., the answers to them cannot be found precisely from the information provided in the passage.
Example: Paragraph- Sent 1: A Republican bid to keep the government open past Friday includes no new money for the construction of a border wall along the U.S.-Mexico border, according to several congressional aides familiar with ongoing talks.
Sent 2: GOP leaders submitted the new offer Tuesday afternoon in an effort to appease Democrats, whose votes are needed to avert a shutdown of federal agencies, several House and Senate aides said.
Sent 3: However, Republicans also insisted on increases in border security and defense spending, including money to repair existing fencing and new surveillance technology to patrol the nearly 2,000-mile border.
Sent 4: Democrats have indicated that they would support such appropriations so long as no money goes toward an actual wall.
Example solution: Who has to be appeased to keep the government open?
Example explanation: This is a good multi-sentence question because, "appease Democrats" is mentioned in Sent 2, while "keep the government open" is part of Sent 1. As this question requires more than one sentences to answer, it's a good question.

Problem: Paragraph- Sent 1: In Utah, lawmakers do not feel the need to appropriate money so that the poor and elderly can afford quality legal care.
Sent 2: Perhaps this is because attorneys, spurred on by campaigns such as the annual one called, "And Justice for All," have been unusually generous in recent years, donating money for this purpose.
Sent 3: But the need keeps growing larger, and that means attorneys, and all others with the means, have a greater obligation to help.
Sent 4: This year, the "And Justice for All" campaign is suffering from some of the same problems facing other charitable organizations after the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11.
Sent 5: Individual and corporate donations remain strong, but so far no large organization has stepped forward with a big challenge grant, as has happened in each of the past three years.
Sent 6: That means the responsibility for giving is greater now than ever.
Sent 7: Utah's poor and disadvantaged need all types of legal help, from dealing with domestic abuse to protecting limited assets in old age.
Sent 8: This campaign provides financial assistance to agencies that regularly deal with these problems and know how best to direct the resources.
Sent 9: Hard as it is to believe, the campaign is only in its fourth year.
Sent 10: Three years ago, thousands of people in Utah went without competent legal representation because the resources simply weren't available.
Sent 11: Back then, the Disability Law Center, Legal Aid Society and Utah Legal Services combined received less than $75,000 in donations from lawyers and other legal professionals.
Sent 12: Since then, "And Justice for All" has raised $1.3 million.
Sent 13: More than one-third of the Utah Bar, 2,221 attorneys, have contributed.
Sent 14: Organizers say this is one of the highest rates anywhere in the nation.
Sent 15: The giving hasn't been limited to attorneys.
Sent 16: Philanthropists, corporations and other private entities have donated more than $368,000.
Sent 17: None of these contributors can afford to let up now, especially with the economy suffering both locally and nationally.
Sent 18: And the two-thirds of the Utah Bar that does not donate needs to step up.

Solution: Who was poor?