Question: What claim can be made from the following pieces of evidence?
1. This short term thinking has become a serious problem meaning there are big holes in pension funds and the government may not have enough to pay for elderly care in the future .
2. Rather than adopting a ` right now ' attitude to government policies on taxes and spending , individuals would be more likely to think about the long-term consequences of government policy knowing that their future is directly tied to the financial future of their children .
3. -LRB- cost of caring for the elderly set to double , -RRB- Therefore voters would support financially sensible policies that avoid increasing deficits and national debt .
4. For example Sir Derek Wanless has warned that the amount spent by government , individuals and organizations in Britain on caring for the sick and disabled elderly will increase from 10 billion a year to 20 billion a year by 2026 .

Claim: Everyone would benefit from choosing policies that think about the long-term future.


Question: What claim can be made from the following pieces of evidence?
1. These myths claim that immigrants are criminals and that they steal jobs from natives .
2. Without this equal treatment , common myths about migrants will continue to be widely believed .
3. It is a violation of migrants human rights to be treated this way , and they will only be seen as equals when they are granted economic protection that allows them to work alongside natives .
4. The organization Migrant Rights says , All these myths rob migrant workers and refugees of their humanity , and are aimed at portraying them as less deserving of our sympathy and help .
5. According to Article 13 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights , everyone has the right to leave or enter a country , as well as to move within it -LRB- internal migration -RRB- .
6. Unless migrants receive equal social and economic rights , they will never be seen as equal in a human sense .
7. Human rights also include fair treatment under the welfare state , and increased economic protections for migrants is necessary in many states for them to receive such treatment .
8. This freedom of movement is often not granted under current laws .
9. , , accessed June 30 , 2011 , .

Claim: Further protections are required to grant migrants full human rights.


Question: What claim can be made from the following pieces of evidence?
1. Not only is banning abortion a problem in theory , offending against a woman 's right to choose , it is also a practical problem .
2. Enforcing an abortion ban would require a quite degrading and inhumane treatment of those women who wished to have their fetus terminated .
3. Moreover , if pregnant women traveled abroad , they would be able to have an abortion in a country where it was legal .
4. Either the state takes the draconian measure of restricting freedom of movement , or it must admit that its law is unworkable in practice and abolish it .
5. The middle way of tacitly accepting foreign terminations would render hypocritical the much-vaunted belief in the sanctity of life .
6. The demand for abortions will always exist ; making abortion illegal , will simply drive it underground and into conditions where the health and safety of the woman might be put at risk .
7. Example : Polish women , living in a country with extremely restrictive abortion laws often go abroad to the Netherlands , Germany and Austria for abortions .
8. Women who are not lucky enough to live in environments such as the EU may be forced to go to foreign countries and undergo underground , unsafe abortions .

Claim: There are practical problems with banning abortion


Question: What claim can be made from the following pieces of evidence?
1. All sorts of hunting , shooting , and fishing boil down to slaughtering other animals for pleasure .
2. If the prey is a pest -LRB- e.g. foxes -RRB- , or needs culling -LRB- e.g. hares , deer -RRB- , there are always more humane ways to kill it than hunting it to the point of terror and exhaustion with a pack of hounds - e.g. killing it with a rifle shot .
3. If the prey is being killed for food it is entirely gratuitous .
4. In modern society people do not need to kill food for themselves but can buy it from a source where animals have been killed humanely ; indeed no-one needs to eat meat at all and for moral , health , and environmental reasons they should not -LRB- see vegetarianism debate -RRB- .
5. As for fishing , again there is absolutely no need to catch or eat fish ; even when anglers throw their catch back in they have first put a hook through its palate .

Claim:
Blood sports cannot be justified by reference to their role in pest control or conservation