Input: Southern Cross Austereo chairman shocks with flippant comment. In response to a shareholder question, Max Moore-Wilton said "S-H-I-T happens" Company released a transcript Wednesday, saying quotes had been taken out of context. Last December, two Austereo DJs provoked outrage with a prank call to a hospital.
Output: It took just two "immortal words" for the chairman of a leading Australian media group to whip up hundreds more in print and online in the Australian press on Tuesday. Those words were "S-H-I-T happens," a phrase the chairman of Southern Cross Austereo (SCA) later reportedly dismissed as "a comment in one sentence" and "everyday parlance in Australia." The problem was those words were uttered, with the first spelled out, in response to a shareholder question about whether the company had a "cultural problem" as evidenced partly by the "UK incident." The "UK incident" refers to the apparent suicide of 46-year-old British nurse Jacintha Saldanha, three days after two Austereo DJs made a prank call to the hospital treating the then-pregnant Duchess of Cambridge. Using poor impersonations of Queen Elizabeth II and the Prince of Wales, Mel Greig and Michael Christian called the hospital switchboard and managed to talk to someone with knowledge of the Duchess' medical condition. It later emerged that Saldanha was the nurse who put them through. READ MORE: Who was nurse Jacintha Saldanha? On Wednesday, the company issued a statement alleging that Max Moore-Wilton's comments to a room full of shareholders at the company's annual general meeting in Melbourne were "taken out of context." It added that Moore-Wilton "would like to emphasize that his words should not be read as his or the company's lack of concern or sympathies towards those who have been involved in the Royal prank call issue." It included a full transcript of the question and answer:. Shareholder Question:. "Just in relation to Eddie and King Kong, Kyle and obviously the UK incident, do we have a cultural problem?" Max Moore-Wilton Answer:. "I think it's fair to say that those incidents were very unfortunate, there is no doubt about that. In each particular case we thoroughly investigated them and it comes generally within the context of some of these incidents where a whole series of events come together and in the immortal words of somebody who I forget, S-H-I-T happens." The answer goes on to address the "Kyle" question, a reference to shock jock Kyle Sandilands whose no-holds-barred approach to the discipline has long outraged and offended listeners. Moore-Wilton didn't separately address the portion of the question regarding "Eddie and King Kong," a reference to presenter Eddie McGuire who suggested on air that a star AFL player should be used to promote the King Kong musical. The comment was widely interpreted to mean he was calling him an ape. In regard to what he called the "United Kingdom incident," Moore-Wilton said "that is still ongoing." "The Coroner's court hearings in London have been delayed. I understand because further investigations are taking place in India. We however, have put in place again, procedures to ensure that such a situation will not happen again. "We of course have legal proceedings in place. We do not believe that we are in breach of any of the codes and that those matters will go forward but no doubt they did reflect the need to tighten up our procedures and the board and the management have taken considerable time and effort to ensure we've tightened up those procedures" -- SCA statement. 'An insult to a loving mother' In the UK, British lawmaker Keith Vaz issued a statement saying he was "shocked" by Moore-Wilton's comments. "This is an insult to the memory of a loving mother and wife. The radio station has clearly not learnt the lessons from this incident. Mr Moore-Wilton must apologise for his comments immediately." Moore-Wilton reportedly fired back, urging Vaz to look at the transcript of his comments rather than "listening to the truncated and sensationalist reports of the Australian media." He told the Australian Associated Press the phrase was "entirely Australian. I don't know whether it's British but it's certainly ... been used by many Australians to express a point of view. "I'm not here to be censored for my use of a word which is common in everyday parlance in Australia. If you don't like it, or the media don't like it, well that's fine." Outrage over prank call. The call, made in December 2012, provoked international outrage. Social media seethed with scorn for the two presenters who appeared tearful in television interviews when they dared to come out of hiding. "I'm very sorry and saddened for the family, and I can't imagine what they've been going through," Greig said on the program "Today Tonight." Christian described himself as "gutted, shattered and heartbroken." READ MORE: Two presenters apologize for prank call. The two presenters were taken off air, their show canceled and all advertising suspended. However, just six months later, Austereo bosses announced they were thrilled that Christian had won a national competition to find the "next top jock." Greig is yet to return to air and has filed a legal claim against 2DayFM, for failing to provide a safe workplace in relation to the prank call. In September, 2DayFM took the Australian Communications and Media Authority to the Federal Court, alleging that it didn't have the authority to reach a preliminary finding that the station breached the Surveillance Devices Act 2007. The ACMA has not publicly released the findings of its investigation but provided 2DayFM with a preliminary copy. The court is still considering its verdict.

Input: The couple - who had been married for 17 years - went to Sheila Loven because they thought she had the same values as them. Used the sessions to drive a wedge between them and have an affair with husband. When the couple realized her plan and reconciled, she starting sending them disturbing texts. Another woman said Loven used their sessions to persuade her to kiss her and have sex with her. A recovering alcoholic accused Loven of taking her to a bar and forcing her to drink. Wife testified the counselor was like her best friend.
Output:
By. Rachel Quigley. PUBLISHED:. 11:08 EST, 20 February 2013. |. UPDATED:. 12:53 EST, 20 February 2013. Marriage counselor Sheila Loven told her client his marriage was over so he would have sex with her. After a former marriage counselor was convicted of sexual assault for having sex with one of her clients while she was treating him, another patient - a female - testified that she was also coerced into having sex with her. A jury found Sheila Loven, 47, from Texas, guilty on Monday for her behavior when she was  taking John and Brenda Holliday, from Arlington, for joint. therapy in 2009. During the sentencing stage of her trial, a 35-year-old woman said Loven asked her during therapy if she had ever kissed a girl before and said it would make her feel better if she did. Days after they kissed they had sex in a car together, something the witness said made her feel 'dirty' and 'wrong'. She had initially come to the counselor after she split from her husband. According to the Star Telegram, the woman told the court: 'Loven said it would make me feel better. Up to that. point I had never had a homosexual relationship. 'I tried to think it. through and it bothered me. I blamed myself. I thought it was me. It. made me feel really dirty.' Like Brenda Holliday testified last week, the woman said yesterday that Loven had become her best friend and that her therapist had described their meeting as 'God-like'. The 47-year-old's guilty verdict came after four days of testimony from the Hollidays which described how Loven drove them against each other, advised the wife to file for divorce and told the husband his marriage was over before seducing him. The couple reconciled after they compared notes and realized what Loven was doing. She faces a maximum of 20 years in prison and $10,000 fine. The female sexual assault victim also told the court yesterday that Loven asked her to hide her computer for her after she had falsified liability documents. She refused. She did, however, submit false insurance. claims on her behalf, which she has been granted immunity from in. exchange for the testimony against the former therapist. Trial: Loven in court yesterday when she was found guilty of sexual assault. She will be sentenced this week. Another woman, Stephanie Carroll, testified that she was having problems with alcohol, which is why she went to Loven. She said that after her counseling ended Loven invited her to a bar and encouraged her to drink. 'Not even a friend would do that,' she testified, adding that Loven got so drunk they were asked to leave the bar. Another former patient testified that she grew tired of Loven's drug and alcohol abuse and said she would often smoke marijuana and snort cocaine. What upset her the most was that she often did this in front of her youngest daughter. According to the Star Telegram, Loven told the woman's husband to buy marijuana and get her to smoke it because it would make her feel better. She said in court yesterday: 'I had to. get away from it. So I moved out of state. I found a wonderful. counselor who has helped me deal with this.' The woman said she has been diagnosed. with post-traumatic stress and bipolar disorders and has been. hospitalized for those conditions more than 20 times. A tearful Brenda Holliday took the stand last week and testified about her relationship with Loven, which she described as 'visiting my best friend once a week to talk' Sheila Loven counseled a couple in 2009 and allegedly used her counseling influence to encourage the wife to file for divorce, then had an affair with her husband, according to prosecutors. Another former patient, Sharon Creekmore, said that. Loven hurt her relationship with her eldest daughter, after she brought. to her in an attempt to improve her anxiety issues, according to NBC. She said Loven rushed her daughter. back into enrollment at college and that something happened over a period of two. weeks that her daughter has never spoken about. 'I. believe Sheila Loven harmed my relationship with my daughter,' Creekmore. testified. 'My daughter is now distraught to the point of being almost. delusional.' 'It wasn't marriage counseling, it was divorce counseling,' Mrs Holliday said in court. Tarrant County prosecutors charged. Loven, 47, with sexual assault, accusing her of breaking state law by. using her influence as a counselor to coerce the husband into having sex. in summer 2009. Threatening and profane text messages sent from Loven were also read out during the trial. After. the Hollidays reconciled, Loven is said to have sent them a number of. cruel texts until they went to police and reported her for harassment. One text message read: 'When are you going to figure out you are nothing without me. I made you into a man.' A message to the man's wife read: 'And then he talks about your body so bad while he's touching every inch of mine.' 'I hope you enjoyed your lunch. Didn't see me did you?' another text said. Wife. Brenda Holliday tearfully testified to the court last week that Loven. became like a best friend to her and she believed she had found the. perfect counselor, describing their visits like 'going to talk to my. best friend once a week'. 'There was nothing I did not tell her,' the wife testified. I thought. that she genuinely cared about me and I told her how lucky I was to have. found her. 'She told me it was a God thing. She would always give me a. big hug before I left.' Mrs Holliday also revealed Loven told her that her husband was a 'narcissist' and had stopped coming to sessions and following her directions to save the marriage. All the while she was allegedly having an affair with him. Loven's. attorney said it was a legitimate relationship which blossomed from. romance and there is no evidence of emotional coercion. Adam Burny said: 'It had all the. elements of any other romantic relationship. They went out to nightclubs. and dinner, and they spent almost every night together. What you will. not see in this case is any evidence of manipulation.' But the prosecution argued there was. manipulation from the beginning - when she started to see them. separately to 'collect their secrets' and then using these secrets to. drive a wedge between them. Loven advised the wife to get a divorce and then asked the husband on a date. Days later, the pair began having sex. She. stopped office sessions with the husband but continued to have sex with. him, while continuing to counsel his wife, prosecutor Betty Arvin said. 'She was the ultimate inside trader,' Arvin said. 'She got information about their lives that they had never. shared with anyone and she used it, she twisted it for her own sick. reasons.' View more videos at: http://nbcbayarea.com.