Context:
The Speaker<br>The crowd gathered around the podium. A famous speaker was going to talk. They got silent as he opened his mouth. His speech was inspiring and beautiful. They were so happy to have had the opportunity to listen.
Hypothesis: The Speaker talked to a group of people. OPTIONS:
- Yes
- It's impossible to say
- No
Yes


Input: OPTIONS:
- Yes
- It's impossible to say
- No

Waste in the ponds produced by leaching gold from ore is a source of potential environmental dangers.

Sentence: A tactical nuclear strike can be another potential environmental danger.

Output: It's impossible to say


Problem:
Read the following paragraph and determine if the hypothesis is true:

All right, let me explain to you why it's important to me. I have a list. This is an economic statute. The harms that seem to be caused by it, the extension, I've listed as follows, approximate numbers, made up, but magnitude correct. The existing copyright holders who survive, their copyright survives 70 years, who have already been paid, on the numbers that were given, about $24 billion or more, will receive an extra $6 billion.

OPTIONS:
- Yes
- It's impossible to say
- No
Hypothesis: The copyrights will survive for less than 66 years.
****
Answer:
No


[Q]: Well, there was an interest in having a uniform rule, and that's precisely why the Framers created the Copyright Clause in the Constitution, but there was copyright protection in some States, there wasn't copyright protection in other States, and what we know from the decision of this Court in the Wheaton decision is that there was not a common law copyright in existence. This Court explicitly held that. Now, the petitioners make this quid pro quo to draw the line as well as in how long a line The Copyright Clause in the onstitution granted protection because there was an existing common law copyright. OPTIONS:
- Yes
- It's impossible to say
- No
[A]: No


Problem: The original spelling reform of 1996, which was meant to harmonize the spelling rules across the German-speaking countries, turned out to be a major embarrassment if not outright failure.

Based on the paragraph above can we conclude that "The spelling reform was meant for German speaking countries. "? OPTIONS:
- Yes
- It's impossible to say
- No

A: Yes


Context:
All right. Now, previously, on September 12th, the Court entered an order which went to the motion for reconsideration. That related specifically to -- filed by the reporters. That went specifically to our August 2nd order which, in effect, said that the reporters would have to testify at certain depositions.
Hypothesis: The court case is still ongoing. OPTIONS:
- Yes
- It's impossible to say
- No

It's impossible to say