Q: Generate a context and a hypothesis.

Generated: Context: Justice, we are not making an empirical claim at all. Nothing in our Copyright Clause claim hangs upon the empirical assertion about impeding progress. Our only argument is, this is a structural limit necessary to assure that what would be an effectively perpetual term not be permitted under the copyright laws.

Hypothesis: This case has witnesses


Q: Generate a context and a hypothesis.

Generated: Context: Every year, about a quarter of all children sustain an injury serious enough to require medical attention, school absences, and/or bed rest.

Hypothesis: Children get injured every year.


Q: Generate a context and a hypothesis.

Generated: Context: How to make baked red peppers stuffed with spinach, shallots and fresh sage<br>Preheat oven to 350 ° f (177 ° c). Heat 1 tbsp. Of olive oil in a large skillet over medium-high heat. Add the spinach, cover, and cook for 2 to 3 minutes, until just wilted.

Hypothesis: Your cat will be angry if you give it  baked red peppers.


Q: Generate a context and a hypothesis.

Generated:
Context: But you -- under your intermediate scrutiny test we would not be hypothesizing what might have been in Congress's mind. Your First Amendment test is a stringent one. You have to have an important purpose, and the means that you use is necessarily tied to that purpose. If you take that position, I don't see how you make the retroactive-prospective line work.

Hypothesis: purpose is not necessary for this position