Input: OPTIONS:
- Yes
- It's impossible to say
- No

It is a country place about a hundred miles from here .<br>Pine Valley is its name .<br>It 's restful and homey , and the people are so nice .<br>If you like , I 'll give you the address of the family I boarded with . ''<br>`` Thank you , '' said Constance indifferently .<br>`` I might as well go there as anywhere else . ''<br>`` Yes , but listen to me , dear .<br>Do n't take your morbidness with you .<br>Open your heart to the summer , and let its sunshine in , and when you come back in the fall , come prepared to let us all be your friends .

Sentence: pine valley has nice people.

Output: Yes


Problem:
Read the following paragraph and determine if the hypothesis is true:

Maybe we should ask. So if you're asking me if I feel it's enough or if it's -- I'm not sure what it is you're asking me about that. I feel, actually, that there are topics that probably could be explored in more detail, but I understand that there are limitations within any textbook that you have to hit on core concepts. I believe that core concepts are covered, but I think that, in my opinion, what I've looked at, it's historical context.

OPTIONS:
- Yes
- It's impossible to say
- No
Hypothesis: textbook has been made by somebody named timmy
****
Answer:
It's impossible to say


[Q]: I -- no, Justice Ginsburg, we would not, and the reason is again related to the method we have adopted to interpret "limited times." We have not said that "promote the progress of science" is a general and independent constraint on the Copyright Clause authority. We've said it must be looked to to interpret the scope of "limited times," and unless retrospective extensions are forbidden, it will eviscerate the meaning of "limited times." That does not occur in the context of the scope of exclusive right, nor in the context of the power to secure. If that's -- The person is legislator OPTIONS:
- Yes
- It's impossible to say
- No
[A]: It's impossible to say


Problem: Village of Euclid, Ohio v. Ambler Realty Co., 272 U.S. 365 (1926) , more commonly Euclid v. Ambler, was a United States Supreme Court landmark case argued in 1926. It was the first significant case regarding the relatively new practice of zoning, and served to substantially bolster zoning ordinances in towns nationwide in the United States and in other countries of the world including Canada.

Based on the paragraph above can we conclude that "the case helped to substantially bolster zoning ordinances in towns in the US"? OPTIONS:
- Yes
- It's impossible to say
- No

A: Yes


Q: The speaker thinks that all Americans should have some tax relief.
That stands in stark contrast, by the way, to a man who is going to leave 50 million -- 50 million Americans out of tax relief. We just have a different point of view. It's a totally different point of view. He believes only the right people ought to get tax relief.
OPTIONS:
- Yes
- It's impossible to say
- No
A: Yes


Q: press the numbers 011 first
How to dial the uk<br>Dial your country's exit code. An exit code permits you to dial out of your country and is a necessary part of any international phone call, no matter which country you end up dialing. Before dialing specific digits to connect you to your uk contact, you will need to dial the exit code specific to the country you are dialing out of.
OPTIONS:
- Yes
- It's impossible to say
- No
A:
It's impossible to say