Context:
I would suggest that, if ever one were to search for an example of the lack of relevancy in 1999 of the Senate of Canada, the past two weeks of hearings in the Standing Senate Committee on Energy, Environment and Natural Resources stands as stark evidence in support of such a proposition.
Hypothesis: one person thinks the Senate of Canada is irrlevant OPTIONS:
- Yes
- It's impossible to say
- No
Yes


Input: OPTIONS:
- Yes
- It's impossible to say
- No

Breakfast Creek Hotel is a heritage-listed hotel at 2 Kingsford Smith Drive, Albion, City of Brisbane, Queensland, Australia. It was designed by Simkin & Ibler and built in 1889 to 1890 by Thomas Woollam & William Norman. It was added to the Queensland Heritage Register on 21 October 1992.

Sentence: The Breakfast Creek Hotel was added to the Queensland Heritage Register on 21 October 1991.

Output: No


Problem:
Read the following paragraph and determine if the hypothesis is true:

I think a lot of times we just spend aid and say we feel better about it and it ends up being spent the wrong way, and there's some pretty egregious examples recently. One being Russia, where we had IMF loans that ended up in the pockets of a lot of powerful people and didn't help the nation.

OPTIONS:
- Yes
- It's impossible to say
- No
Hypothesis: I don't think Russia benefitted fully from aid
****
Answer:
Yes


[Q]: Saudi Arabia, the biggest oil producer in the world, was once a supporter of Osama bin Laden and his associates who led attacks against the United States. The attacks against the United States were led by Saudi Arabia. OPTIONS:
- Yes
- It's impossible to say
- No
[A]: Yes


Problem: Tired<br>Eric went to the gym. He had a very strenuous cardio workout. He ran almost seven miles. When he went home he took a shower. Then he sat down and immediately fell asleep.

Based on the paragraph above can we conclude that "Eric ran 7 miles everyday"? OPTIONS:
- Yes
- It's impossible to say
- No

A: It's impossible to say


Context:
General Olson, you say that the functional equivalent of an unlimited time would be a violation, but that's precisely the argument that's being made by petitioners here, that a limited time which is extendable is the functionable, functional equivalent of an unlimited time, a limited time that 10 years from now can be extended, and then extended again, and extended again. Why -- their argument is precisely that, a limited time doesn't mean anything unless it means, once you have established the limit for works that have been created under that limit, that's the end.
Hypothesis: General Olson is a member of the United States Army. OPTIONS:
- Yes
- It's impossible to say
- No

It's impossible to say