Context:
If he takes that position he also runs the risk that should at some point in the future his situation change so that he cannot continue to operate without some sort of temporary closure or a long term closure, he has now opened himself up for all kinds of legal liability, lawsuits and persecution in the courts.
Hypothesis: If he continues to operate in the future his situation will change.
It's impossible to say
Context:
Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window) Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window) Youth take political leaders to court to accelerate fight against global warming CBC Radio’s The Current interviewed David Boyd, a UBC professor and environmental lawyer, for a segment about youth taking political leaders to court for cases related to climate change. He discussed how litigation is a tool worth using in the fight against climate change. The segment starts at 39:10.
Hypothesis: the segment started after 29:13
Yes
Context:
Well, I suppose implicit in the argument that the '76 act, too, should have been declared void, and that we might leave it alone because of the disruption, is that for all these years the act has impeded progress in science and the useful arts. I just don't see any empirical evidence for that.
Hypothesis: 43 years ago an act was passed in parliament which has been seen to impede progress in science and useful arts.

Yes