instruction:
The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the self-need strategy, otherwise output No. self-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used to create a personal need for an item in the negotiation, such as by pointing out that the participant sweats a lot to show preference towards water packages.
question:
Context: 'Food is actually my first priority but since it seems to be first priority for us both I thought we could split that. Water doesn't seem to be a priority for you so thought I could take that' 'My first priority is actually firewood.  Food is my second.  🙂' 'Okay so would 2 firewood for you and 1 for me work, and 2 food for me and 1 for you?'
Utterance: 'I can definitely agree to that.  What was your second preference?  Water was my third.'
answer:
No


question:
Context: 'I am dong just fine! and you?' 'Pretty good! I am excited about going camping though. When we split this, what do you need the most?' 'We are all about the food over here! what about you?'
Utterance: 'I really need the water! How do you feel about each of us getting 3 of what we need the most?'
answer:
Yes


question:
Context: 'Which supplies do you need?' 'Well, I really need water in case we get really thirsty from hiking. I also need firewood in case it gets colder and we need more. It would be cool to have more food added for dessert like s'mores, but it's not really necessary.' 'How about you take all the water and one of the firewoods, and I can have all the food and 2 of the firewoods'
Utterance: 'Let me think about it. What supplies do you need?'
answer:

No


