The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the self-need strategy, otherwise output No. self-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used to create a personal need for an item in the negotiation, such as by pointing out that the participant sweats a lot to show preference towards water packages.

Example Input: Context: 'Hi! I'm very excited for the upcoming camping trip!! 🙂' 'Me too! 🙂 What do you think about the extra supplies?'
Utterance: 'I recently bought two new puppies, and they are coming on the trip. I could really use the extra water for them!'
Example Output: No

Example Input: Context: 'Interesting.  If I decided to forgo water completely, would you accept giving me everything else?' 'no, at the most i can do is i get 2 water, 2 food and 0 firewood or I get 1 water, 3 food and 1 firewood' 'But you get everything you wanted. You said you needed 3 water, I offered it to you.'
Utterance: 'but i can't give you 3 food and 3 firewood, thats 6 items vs the 3 water'
Example Output: No

Example Input: Context: 'Camping yay!' 'Hello! how are you? hoping today is finding you well. I was wondering if I can get all 3 of your Firewood, I am willing to trade for all 3 waters. I am camping with 40 kids, its our annual youth camp. its rainy season too, I really want to ensure I have enough dried wood with us. need lots of firewood for the amount of cooking I will be doing, keep the camp warm, and specially to keep those pesky bugs away. what do you think?'
Utterance: 'I could really use the firewood too, it will be very cold where we are going. Since it will be cold, we will not be drinking much water. How about 2 firewood for you, 3 food for me?, '
Example Output:
Yes

