The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the self-need strategy, otherwise output No. self-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used to create a personal need for an item in the negotiation, such as by pointing out that the participant sweats a lot to show preference towards water packages.
Example: Context: 'That sounds pretty reasonable as I am in need of firewood the most. Would it be most reasonable to each take what we need most and split the water down the middle?' 'Yes, it would.' 'I think that sounds fair. The problem is that there are 3 waters and one of us would get two and the other one. How should we sort that?'
Utterance: 'You can take the two water. I am not that thirsty most days.'
Example solution: No
Example explanation: In this utterance, the participant does not use self-need since they do not talk about any need for themselves.

Problem: Context: 'My trip is going pretty so so too  im sorry to hear that about yours!! sounds like we both are gonna need some extra stuff? I was wondering if we could start with the water? any chance i could have it all and you can have all of something else? thoughts? im open to discussion' 'I am actually very much in need of water. I fell while I was hiking during this trip. I have a really bad wound I need to clean on my leg. ' 'yikes that stinks. i got some extra people with me and we dont hve enough either. could i take 2 since we will be drinking it and maybe you can have 1 to get that wound cleaned up'
Utterance: 'There is a lot of blood on my wound and if I don't get it cleaned I am afraid I would have to have it amputated. It's likely I'll be stationary a long time. Maybe I can give you 2 water in exchange for 2 foods since I'll be stuck up here for a long time? '

Solution: Yes