We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

[EX Q]: Even though you deny it, your statements show you have no problem executing innocent people.
[EX A]: Valid

[EX Q]: And no, I do not claim that there are trials that can determine innocence after execution...we hold those while they are alive, and before they are sentenced to death.
[EX A]: Valid

[EX Q]: So far, I am hearing "an eye for an eye" which is just that vengeance centered sense of justice that I am arguing against.
[EX A]:
Valid

