We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

Input: Consider Input: Granted, someone, who bestows great harm onto a family for egregious acts, doesn't give the government the right to kill that person.

Output: Valid


Input: Consider Input: The death penalty again, in giving punishing the offender sends out a message to others that no one should kill or hurt another person which will thus serve to deter other potential killers.

Output: Valid


Input: Consider Input: And I imagine we would do it even more if we ignored the Constitutional processes involved in capital punishment - lawyers and all that mess.


Output: Valid


