We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

[EX Q]: Scott Blonien, assistant secretary of the department, characterized Stern's objections as more individual than professional.
[EX A]: Invalid

[EX Q]: So check up on things a little more next time before you start throwing around blind accusations.�۝
[EX A]: Invalid

[EX Q]: I think that criminals view the death penalty as worse than life imprisonment and worse than temporary solitary confinement within life imprisonment - at least given the conditions in American prisons.
[EX A]:
Valid

