We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

Example Input: So I argue that 3000 years of use does provide evidence that capital punishment works.
Example Output: Valid

Example Input: If these bleak prospects aren't enough to deter someone from committing a serious crime, what will ramping it up to the death penalty do?
Example Output: Valid

Example Input: capitol punishment works,no convicted fellon ever exsecuted by the state of texas has ever gone on yo kill again.
Example Output:
Valid

