The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the self-need strategy, otherwise output No. self-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used to create a personal need for an item in the negotiation, such as by pointing out that the participant sweats a lot to show preference towards water packages.

[Q]: Context: 'So 1 firewood, 0 food and 3 water for you?' 'No 3 packages of firewood, 1 package of water, and I can give you 3 packages of food.  I need the Firewood the most.' 'Tell me why you need so much firewood?'
Utterance: 'I have other people coming with me and we don't have insulated sleeping bags.  The temperature also drops drastically at night.'
[A]: Yes


[Q]: Context: 'Haha I suck at those activities as well. I don't usually don't eat a lot, so I'm happy to exchange some food supplies for water supplies. ' 'I would be willing to do that. What do you propose?' 'I get 2 water, 1 food and 1 firewood, you get 1 water, 2 food and 2 firewood. '
Utterance: 'You know what that sounds extremely fair. I would accept that offer'
[A]: No


[Q]: Context: 'i hope we can come to a compromise 🙂, what is another priority of yours besides the wood?' 'Food is a second priority for me, as I will be metal-detecting as well, & cannot risk fainting from the heat. How about I give you two firewood (I don't think we can "share", haha), you can give me two food packages, and two water packages.' 'okay, I am willing to give up more food to get the firewood, I like your offer🙂'
Utterance: 'I do as well. I'm glad we could come to an agreement! 🙂'
[A]:
No


