input: Make use of the article to answer the questions. CHAPTER TWENTY-FIRST. 

Now turn the Psalms of David ower, And lilt wi' holy clangor; Of double verse come gie us four, And skirl up the Bangor. Burns. 

The next was the important day, when, according to the forms and ritual of the Scottish Kirk, Reuben Butler was to be ordained minister of Knocktarlitie, by the Presbytery of ------. And so eager were the whole party, that all, excepting Mrs. Dutton, the destined Cowslip of Inverary, were stirring at an early hour. 

Their host, whose appetite was as quick and keen as his temper, was not long in summoning them to a substantial breakfast, where there were at least a dozen of different preparations of milk, plenty of cold meat, scores boiled and roasted eggs, a huge cag of butter, half-a-firkin herrings boiled and broiled, fresh and salt, and tea and coffee for them that liked it, which, as their landlord assured them, with a nod and a wink, pointing, at the same time, to a little cutter which seemed dodging under the lee of the island, cost them little beside the fetching ashore. 

"Is the contraband trade permitted here so openly?" said Butler. "I should think it very unfavourable to the people's morals." 

"The Duke, Mr. Putler, has gien nae orders concerning the putting of it down," said the magistrate, and seemed to think that he had said all that was necessary to justify his connivance. Butler was a man of prudence, and aware that real good can only be obtained by remonstrance when remonstrance is well-timed; so for the present he said nothing more on the subject.  1. What was the important day?
2. What was happening?
3. Who?
4. Where are they?
5. What country is that in?
6. What was the deal with the drinks?
7. Where did they come from?
8. Was it legal?
9. How many types of milk did they have?
10. What time did they wake up?
11. What kind of eggs did they have?
numbered_answers: 1. The next
2. Ordaining of a minister
3. Reuben Butler
4. Knocktarlitie
5. Scotland
6. They were available for those who liked them
7. Off the island
8. No
9. At least a dozen
10. At an early hour
11. Roasted

input: Make use of the article to answer the questions. (CNN) -- As prodigal golfer Tiger Woods resumes the world's No. 1 ranking, his chief sponsor, Nike, unveiled a slogan Tuesday that provokes robust debate on what is redemption and has Woods attained it. 

"Winning takes care of everything" is what Nike declared on its social media outlets after Woods completed his long climb back to the top ranking, more than three years after his extramarital affairs ruined his marriage and embarrassed him. Woods and ex-wife, Elin Nordegren, have two children. 

Many fans and consumers are now raging against the new campaign by Nike, which stood by Woods in his fall from grace as most other sponsors dumped him. 

"Will not buy anything Nike again," wrote Melissa Santa-Cruz of Wisconsin on Nike's Facebook page. 

"THIS AD MAKES ME SICK!" wrote Julie Drake, a high school teacher who said she will use the ad for a classroom discussion. "Shame on you!" 

Others, however, endorsed the slogan. 

"Love your Ad Nike," wrote Brian Edwards. "Keep up the good work." 

Opinion: For Tiger, winning does take care of everything 

The passionate opinions roil during a week when redemption is on the minds of Jews celebrating Passover and Christians preparing for Easter. 

The controversy grows from whether winning indeed absolves transgressions -- and even prompts a return to grace. The narrative plays out in different ways for different public figures. 

"I think that winning, especially in Tiger Woods' case, really does change things because it reminds people why they fell in love with him years ago. It was for his game and his ability to consistently make those tough shots over and over again. That's why we're in awe of Tiger," said CEO Melinda Travis of PRO Sports Communications, a strategic communications and crisis management firm in Los Angeles.  1. Who wrote "This Ad makes me sick!"?
2. What was her profession?
3. Who is Tiger Woods?
4. What is his world rank?
5. Who is his chief sponsor?
6. What did they post on their social media?
7. Why?
8. What happened three years before that?
9. How did that affect him?
10. Who was he married to?
11. Did they have any children?
12. How many?
13. Did Nike stand by him through that?
14. How did that make fans and consumers feel about Nike?
15. What did his other sponsors do?
16. Who is Melissa Santa-Cruz?
17. What did she write on their page?
18. What did other fans do?
19. What did they write?
20. Why was redemption on their minds?
numbered_answers: 1. Julie Drake
2. a high school teacher
3. prodigal golfer
4. No. 1
5. Nike
6. "Winning takes care of everything"
7. Woods got top of his rank
8. extramarital affairs ruined his marriage
9. it embarrassed him
10. Elin Nordegren
11. Yes
12. two
13. Yes
14. angry
15. dumped him
16. A fan of Nike's Facebook page
17. Will not buy anything Nike again
18. endorsed the slogan
19. "Love your Ad Nike,"  "Keep up the good work."
20. because Jews were celebrating Passover and Christians were preparing for Easter.

input: Make use of the article to answer the questions. (CNN) -- A Florida jury awarded a widow $23.6 billion in punitive damages in her lawsuit against tobacco giant R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company, her lawyer said. 

Cynthia Robinson claimed that smoking killed her husband, Michael Johnson, in 1996. She argued R.J. Reynolds was negligent in not informing him that nicotine is addictive and smoking can cause lung cancer. Johnson started smoking when he was 13 and died of lung cancer when he was 36. 

The jury award Friday evening is "courageous," said Robinson's lawyer, Christopher Chestnut. 

"If anyone saw the documents that this jury saw, I believe that person would have awarded a similar or greater verdict amount," he said. 

The Escambia County trial took four weeks and the jury deliberated for 15 hours, according to the Pensacola News Journal. The verdict included more than $16 million in compensatory damages, the newspaper said. 

Nine ex-smokers on their last cigarette 

Chestnut said five of the six jurors who heard the case were 45 or younger, which meant he had to show them how the tobacco industry presented its product before the public awareness campaigns on tobacco risks and dangers in the 1990s. 

In a statement, J. Jeffery Raborn, vice president and assistant general counsel for R. J. Reynolds, said, "The damages awarded in this case are grossly excessive and impermissible under state and constitutional law. 

"This verdict goes far beyond the realm of reasonableness and fairness and is completely inconsistent with the evidence presented," said Raborn. "We plan to file post-trial motions with the trial court promptly and are confident that the court will follow the law and not allow this runaway verdict to stand."  1. What did John like to do?
numbered_answers:
1. Smoke