input: Make use of the article to answer the questions. (CNN) -- Manchester City have completed a sensational transfer deadline-day swoop for Brazilian forward Robinho in an estimated £32.5 million ($58 million) deal with Real Madrid, following the English Premier League club's takeover by an Abu Dhabi group on Monday. 

Brazilian Robinho joins Manchester City for a British transfer record of £32.5 million. 

Chelsea had been leading the chase for Robinho, who had insisted he wanted to play for the London club. 

However, Real had stood firm in insisting that they did not want to sell 24-year-old Robinho and refused numerous Chelsea offers in recent weeks, putting an end to that deal. 

But City -- with new financial clout provided by their Middle East-based owners -- met the valuation placed on Robinho by the Spanish giants, breaking the British transfer record. 

Robinho told City's Web site: "I knew that Manchester City is a very big club, there's a great team there already and this is an exciting project. 

"I liked the project, and when City made the offer to Real Madrid, I decided to come here. I liked the plans that Manchester City have and I want to succeed with them." 

Robinho confirmed the presence of his international team-mates Jo and Elano at City was a factor in his decision to sign, even though Chelsea appeared a more likely destination at the start of transfer deadline day. 

Hughes, who had a playing spell in Spain with Barcelona, has spoken to his new signing and Robinho is keen to work with the former Blackburn and Wales manager.  1. How much was the trade worth?
2. Who got Robinho?
3. What position does Robinho play?
4. Who did Manchester get him from?
5. Did anyone else try to get Robinho?
6. Who?
7. Had they put in offers for him?
8. Is Robinho happy about the trade?
9. How old is he?
10. What web site interviewed Robinho?
11. Does he think Manchester has a good team already?
numbered_answers: 1. estimated £32.5 million ($58 million)
2. Manchester City
3. forward
4. Real Madrid
5. yes
6. Chelsea
7. yes
8. yes
9. 24
10. Manchester City's
11. yes

input: Make use of the article to answer the questions. CHAPTER V. 

_THE WAR BETWEEN CÆSAR AND POMPEY._ 

What official arrangements were made for Proconsuls in regard to money, when in command of a province, we do not know. The amounts allowed were no doubt splendid, but it was not to them that the Roman governor looked as the source of that fortune which he expected to amass. The means of plunder were infinite, but of plunder always subject to the danger of an accusation. We remember how Verres calculated that he could divide his spoil into three sufficient parts--one for the lawyers, one for the judges, so as to insure his acquittal, and then one for himself. This plundering was common--so common as to have become almost a matter of course; but it was illegal, and subjected some unfortunate culprits to exile, and to the disgorging of a part of what they had taken. No accusation was made against Cicero. As to others there were constantly threats, if no more than threats. Cicero was not even threatened. But he had saved out of his legitimate expenses a sum equal to £18,000 of our money--from which we may learn how noble were the appanages of a Roman governor. The expenses of all his staff passed through his own hands, and many of those of his army. Any saving effected would therefore be to his own personal advantage. On this money he counted much when his affairs were in trouble, as he was going to join Pompey at Pharsalia in the following year. He then begged Atticus to arrange his matters for him, telling him that the sum was at his call in Asia,[116] but he never saw it again: Pompey borrowed it--or took it; and when Pompey had been killed the money was of course gone.  1. Who thought he could split his spoil into parts?
2. How many parts?
3. Who was one part for?
4. And the second part?
5. For what purpose?
6. And the last part?
7. Were there a limited amount of ways to plunder?
8. How many ways?
9. Was looting legal?
10. But was it happening a lot?
11. How often?
12. What happened to those caught?
13. Did they have to give back some of what they'd taken?
14. Who was begged to arrange matters?
15. Where would money be waiting for him?
16. Who ended up with the money?
17. How did he get it?
18. What happened to Pompey?
19. And where was the money then?
20. Who were official plans made for?
numbered_answers: 1. Verres.
2. Three.
3. The lawyers.
4. The judges.
5. To insure his acquittal.
6. For himself.
7. No.
8. Infinite,
9. No.
10. Yes.
11. So common, almost a matter of course.
12. Exile.
13. Yes.
14. Atticus.
15. Asia.
16. Pompey.
17. Borrowed it--or took it.
18. He was killed.
19. Gone.
20. Proconsul.

input: Make use of the article to answer the questions. Prosecutors are seeking additional charges against the Cleveland man accused of keeping three women captive in his home for a decade, they told a judge. 

At a eight-minute hearing Wednesday, Ariel Castro, 52, kept his head down, often closing his eyes and speaking only to answer "yes" or "no" to the judge's questions. 

Prosecutor Timothy McGinty told Cuyahoga County Judge Michael Russo there is a possibility of more charges. 

"We are presenting additional evidence to the grand jury next week and the week after. We expect we are going to request further indictments," he said. 

Castro faces 329 counts, including one count of aggravated murder for allegedly causing the unlawful termination of a pregnancy. 

Castro's lawyers have filed a speedy-trial motion, which would mean the case would have to be tried by August 4. However, that deadline could change if Castro's attorneys change course and ask for more time to prepare for the case. 

Russo set the next pretrial hearing for June 26 and told the prosecution and defense that any plea deal would need to be in writing. The defense has said in the past that it would be open to a plea deal if the death penalty was taken off the table. 

This week, Castro entered a not guilty plea to all charges, including 139 counts of rape and 177 counts of kidnapping Michelle Knight, Amanda Berry and Georgina "Gina" DeJesus. Castro fathered a daughter with Berry, according to authorities. 

Police have alleged Knight was impregnated by Castro five times, but he would punch her in the stomach, resulting in miscarriages and termination of all the pregnancies.  1. what did someone allegedly do?
2. who is he?
3. from where?
4. how old is he?
5. how long were the women captive?
6. who is the county attorney?
7. who is the judge?
8. what county?
9. will there be more charges?
10. how many charges is he looking at?
11. what are some charges?
12. for what?
13. what did his attorney file?
14. what does that mean?
15. could that change?
16. how?
17. and do what?
18. for what?
19. when is the next court date?
20. for what?
numbered_answers:
1. kept three women captive
2. Ariel Castro
3. Cleveland
4. 52
5. a decade
6. Timothy McGinty
7. Judge Michael Russo
8. Cuyahoga
9. more charges
10. 329
11. aggravated murder
12. allegedly causing the unlawful termination of a pregnancy
13. a speedy-trial motion
14. the case would have to be tried by August 4
15. yes
16. if Castro's attorneys change course
17. ask for more time to prepare
18. the case
19. June 26
20. a pretrial hearing