Problem: On June 26, 2000, two scientists, called Francis Collins and Craig Venter, told the world that they could read the whole "map" of the human body: DNA. DNA is something that everybody has, and it tells the body what to do. DNA is the reason that we look like our mother and father, because we get some of their DNA to make our own. People have been trying to understand the human body for a long time. In 1860, Gregor Mendel discovered a special reason why we look the same as other people in our family. It is because of small things named "genes" in our body. In 1953, James Watson and Francis Crick made another discovery and found out that those small parts are real messages written in the DNA with a special language. In 1961, Marshall Nirenberg and Johann Matthaci found a message in DNA showing how DNA tells the cell to build its parts. Scientists have now found all the words in the DNA map, but we still do not understand what they all do. By understanding what just one "word" means, we can help save more people from several illnesses. Most people hope that this will help make better medicine and help sick people. Other people worry that when people begin to know more words and find out lots of other information, we might use it in a wrong way, just to make people more attractive, or stop sick people from getting jobs. Man would have to meet a lot of trouble if DNA technic wasn't limited in use.
1. How many scientists were there?
2. What were there names?
3. Who did tey tell they could read the whole map of the human body?
4. When?
5. What is something that everybody has?
6. What did it tell our body?
7. Is it the reason we look like our mother and father?
8. Why?
9. Who discovered this?
Answer: 1. two
2. Francis Collins and Craig Venter
3. the world
4. June 26, 2000
5. DNA
6. what to do
7. yes
8. we get some of their DNA
9. Francis Collins and Craig Venter

Q: O'Fallon, Missouri (CNN) -- Nathan Halbach is 22, with a diagnosis of terminal brain cancer. He knows that "horrible stuff" lies ahead. 

His mother, Pat Bond, has been taking care of him full time. But when she needed help, she reached out to the Roman Catholic Church. 

After all, his father is a priest. 

Nathan was born in 1986, during a five-year affair between his mother and Father Henry Willenborg, the Franciscan priest who celebrated Nathan's baptism. In a story first reported in the New York Times, it was revealed that The Franciscan Order drew up an agreement acknowledging the boy's paternity and agreeing to pay child support in exchange for a pledge of confidentiality. 

Now her son -- the youngest of four children -- may have just weeks to live. And when the Franciscans balked at paying for his care, she decided she was no longer bound by her pledge of confidentiality. 

"I never asked for extraordinary amounts. I asked for the basic needs and care of my son," Bond told CNN's "AC 360." But she said the church told her, "No, we are not Nathan's biological father, we have no legal obligation to your son." 

Willenborg, whose priestly vows require celibacy, has been suspended from his most recent assignment, in northern Wisconsin, as Catholic leaders investigate allegations that he was involved with another woman -- then in high school -- around the same time he was seeing Bond. Willenborg has acknowledged his relationship with Bond, but denies any inappropriate relationship with the other woman while she was a minor, according to his current bishop. 

Answer the following questions:
1. Who is Nathan Halbach's mom?
2. Who has she asked to help her?
3. What does his father do?
4. When was he born?
5. How old does that make him?
6. Is he healthy?
7. What was he diagnosed with?
8. Who takes care of him?
9. Were his parents married when he was born?
10. How long was their affair?
11. Who pays the child support?
12. In exchange for what?
13. Why did she break that pledge?
14. How long does her son have to live?
15. Did she ask for a lot of money?
16. What did she ask for?
17. Was she the only one that his father was involved with?
A: 1. Pat Bond
2. the Roman Catholic Church.
3. He is a priest.
4. 1986
5. 22
6. No.
7. Brain cancer.
8. His mother.
9. No.
10. Five years.
11. The Franciscan Order.
12. A pledge of confidentiality.
13. The Franciscans balked at paying for his care.
14. Weeks.
15. No.
16. The basic needs and care of her son,
17. No.

Problem: CHAPTER I. THE DEATH OF ALEXANDER VI 

Unfortunate Naples was a battle-field once more. France and Spain were engaged there in a war whose details belong elsewhere. 

To the aid of France, which was hard beset and with whose arms things were going none too well, Cesare was summoned to fulfil the obligations under which he was placed by virtue of his treaty with King Louis. 

Rumours were rife that he was negotiating secretly with Gonzalo de Cordoba, the Great Captain, and the truth of whether or not he was guilty of so base a treachery has never been discovered. These rumours had been abroad since May, and, if not arising out of, they were certainly stimulated by, an edict published by Valentinois concerning the papal chamberlain, Francesco Troche. In this edict Cesare enjoined all subjects of the Holy See to arrest, wherever found, this man who had fled from Rome, and whose flight "was concerned with something against the honour of the King of France." 

Francesco Troche had been Alexander's confidential chamberlain and secretary; he had been a diligent servant of the House of Borgia, and when in France had acted as a spy for Valentinois, keeping the duke supplied with valuable information at a critical time, as we have seen. 

Villari says of him that he was "one of the Borgias' most trusted assassins." That he has never been so much as alleged to have murdered anyone does not signify. He was a servant--a trusted servant--of the Borgias; therefore the title of "assassin" is, ipso facto, to be bestowed upon him. 
1. Who was Alexander's secretary?
2. Where did the secretary serve?
3. How was his service described?
4. Did he do any other thing other than being a secretary?
5. Was he a killer?
6. Could he be described as someone good at this?
7. What is the tittle of this page?
8. Which place was described as a battle field
9. Which people fight there?
10. What was the rumours goinh on?
11. Did they eventually find out the truth
12. When did the rumor start to spread?
Answer:
1. Francesco Troche
2. the House of Borgia
3. he had been a diligent servant
4. and when in France had acted as a spy
5. yes
6. yes
7. CHAPTER I. THE DEATH OF ALEXANDER VI
8. Naples was a battle-field once more.
9. France and Spain
10. he was negotiating secretly with Gonzalo de Cordoba
11. no
12. since May,