That's certainly true, and we also believe that, for the reasons averted to by amicus AOL in this case and the reasons you've just suggested, the disruption in that context under the retrospectivity cases Ryder and Reynoldsville Casket Company would be sufficient to fit it within the, quote, "severe disruption exception" to the retrospectivity.
Can we infer the following?
Ryder and Reynoldsville Casket Company will go out of business in the next ten years

pick from the following.
[+] Yes
[+] It's impossible to say
[+] No
The answer is: