Q: 1. Given American cinema's current obsession with innocence and ignorance, at least this never romanticises its protagonists. They are genuinely, irredeemably, 100 per cent no-hopers.
2. Gone are the days of John Belushi, where rudeness was raised to an art form.
3. we can see a lot of these laughs coming, and they don't hold much staying power
4. A gross-out classic.
5. Gross to the max but very funny, this succeeds through energy, ingenuity and -- against all the odds -- the charm of its dopey leads.
6. The wholeheartedness of this descent into crude and rude humor is so good-natured and precise that it's hard not to partake in the guilty pleasures of the exercise.
7. Well titled and, for its purpose, a total success.
8. This is a long way from the social comedy of Jerry Lewis. The characters here are ultimately turned into punching bags or punch-line dispensers.
9. While I won't claim to have gone through this entire film without laughing, there are some long periods between chuckles.
10. a bit too dumb
Based on these individual reviews, what is the critic consensus?

A: Consensus: A relentlessly stupid comedy elevated by its main actors: Jim Carrey goes bonkers and Jeff Daniels carries himself admirably in an against-type performance.
1. It will grip even viewers who aren't interested in rap, as it cuts to the heart of American society in an unnerving way.
2. Unfortunately this film will not satisfy if you are looking to discover the missing link, but if you are simply interested in humor and some 'interesting' footage, to say the least, you will not be disappointed.
3. Most of the information has already appeared in one forum or another and, no matter how Broomfield dresses it up, it tends to speculation, conspiracy theories or, at best, circumstantial evidence.
4. Broomfield's style of journalism is hardly journalism at all, and even those with an avid interest in the subject will grow impatient.
5. Bristles with the sort of passion and bold purpose so often lacking in contemporary nonfiction filmmaking.
6. Even if you have no interest in the gang-infested, East-vs.-West Coast rap wars, this modern mob music drama never fails to fascinate.
7. Daringly perceptive, taut, piercing and feisty, Biggie and Tupac is undeniably subversive and involving in its bold presentation.
8. Broomfield is energized by Volletta Wallace's maternal fury, her fearlessness, and because of that, his film crackles.
9. A brave and incendiary if sometimes haphazardly constructed documentary... by no means a perfect film, but, bristling with contradiction and confrontation, it certainly is alive and -- like its subjects' too-early demise -- worthy of investigation.
10. While Broomfield's film doesn't capture the effect of these tragic deaths on hip-hop culture, it succeeds as a powerful look at a failure of our justice system.
Consensus: This is a compelling documentary, even for those who aren't fans of rap.
Q: 1. Stigmata is possibly the funniest movie ever made about Catholicism.
2. the picture had it's moments, I had my share of chills and as I said ... good point.
3. How several good actors got talked into this movie is a mystery.
4. Ludicrous plot and even worse dialogue!
5. An entertaining and eerie adventure!
6. Pone el dedo en la llaga al cuestionar a los líderes religiosos católicos
7. I don't see the story as an anti-religious film, as much as I saw it as a challenge to having one way of looking at religion.
8. Got a sweet humanistic spiritual message wrapped into its broader themes of bloodletting.
9. Worth a look, even if you walk away a bit offended by the viscera and blasphemy it depicts.
10. A more bone-chilling experience is trying to solve the mystery of whether Arquette, Gabriel Byrne, as the Vatican priest trying to save her, and Nia Long, as the best friend on stand-by, needed to be in a hit this badly.
Based on these individual reviews, what is the critic consensus?

A: Consensus: The story is unconvincing and the acting is weak.
1. Campy theatrics and Busby Berkeley choreography set on a ridiculously breathtaking island paradise -- what's not to love?
2. It's a pretty enjoyable, big-screen songfest that should appeal to both the show's fans as well as aficionados of the Swedish pop group that supplied its tunes.
3. By turns entertaining and excruciating, Mamma Mia!, the jukebox musical that strings together 19 ABBA hits on a narrative thread flimsier than dental floss, had me smiling and wincing, often at the same time.
4. You may find that the movie version of Mamma Mia! brings out your inner Simon Cowell.
5. You can have a perfectly nice time watching this spirited adaptation of the popular stage musical and, once the hangover wears off, acknowledge just how bad it is.
6. The adaptation of the long-running stage hit is a crowd-pleasing gusher of escapism, not the least of which is respite from summertime teen action fare.
7. Would be more persuasive if you felt any real chemistry between Streep and Brosnan. But how could you? They've been singing ABBA songs at each other for two hours.
8. Many lighthearted musicals have frilly plots, but the story cobbled together for Mamma Mia! is particularly superficial and imbecilic.
9. A playful and light-hearted screen version of the popular Broadway musical which is carried by the snappy and happy songs of Abba.
10. Constructing a play -- and now a clumsily staged film -- around ABBA songs is the definition of a frivolous enterprise, and little has been done to temper the ecstatic mood with other shadings of human emotion.
Consensus: This jukebox musical is full of fluffy fun but rough singing voices and a campy tone might not make you feel like "You Can Dance" the whole 90 minutes.
Q: 1. Peosay appears to have taken the Dalai Lama's non-violent philosophy to heart. Rather than rage, his film radiates sadness over a singular way of life in danger of imminent obliteration.
2. Part political thriller, part National Geographic travelogue, Tom Peosay's documentary is a distressing look at China's 50-year repression of the people of Tibet.
3. Each revelation seems more disturbing than the next.
4. ...a damning indictment of one of the world's dirtiest open secrets.
5. A sobering examination of a land in turmoil and a people that have faced what former U.S. ambassador to the United Nations Jeanne Kirkpatrick cites as 20 years of ethnic cleansing.
6. Haunting documentary.
7. A colorful but grimly efficient documentary about a culture under siege.
8. So thorough is the cinematic journalism that you'll swiftly forget what a challenge it must have been to document or simulate all of the key moments in a story that spans thousands of years of history.
9. A passionate work of advocacy documentary.
10. Makes a valuable contribution to our understanding of a people that the world must never be allowed to forget, no matter how much their oppressors would prefer us to do just that.
Based on these individual reviews, what is the critic consensus?

A:
Consensus: Makes no effort to do more than present one side of its story, but does it so passionately and persuasively that the viewer almost cannot help but be moved.