We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

[Q]: Sent1: People sentenced to life in prison shouldn't languish in cells, they should be doing something to aid the society they injured.
 Sent2: If the person in question is in prison, they are removed from society.
[A]: Not similar


[Q]: Sent1: And that killer has help, he has the people that support the death penalty and will give him more appeals, and if found guilty he'll get an easy way out with death, he won't have to suffer.
 Sent2: No he the guy who killed twitter should have to suffer in jail and think about what he done for the rest of his life, and not be given the easy way out buy the death pentaly.
[A]: Not similar


[Q]: Sent1: I don't even give a shit about the death penalty, I was just making a point.
 Sent2: Though I would not call the death penalty murder, I am personally against it.
[A]:
Not similar


