We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

What I don't get is why gay rights groups, neo nazis, white supremacists, pro-abortionists and war protesters all get treated with response and dignity, but groups of gun owners are treated like third class citizens.
Valid

Henry Knox later served as sec of state and "declared" the amendments during martial law and reconstruction to be approved and ratified by the States which was impossible since those State Legislators were prevented from meeting/adjourning.
Valid

so the NRA is so stupid to believe that the second amendment means terrorists can tote around assault rifles

Valid

