Read the given text and if it has abusive content then indicate via "yes". Otherwise indicate via"no". 
We consider the content to be abusive if it contains any of the following instances: (1) Identity Directed Abuse (e.g., Content which contains a negative statement made against an identity. An identity is a social category that relates to a fundamental aspect of individuals community, socio-demographics, position or self-representation) (2) Affiliation Directed Abuse (e.g., Content which express negativity against an affiliation. We define affiliation as a (more or less) voluntary association with a collective. Affiliations include but are not limited to: memberships (e.g. Trade unions), party memberships (e.g. Republicans), political affiliations (e.g. Right-wing people) and occupations (e.g. Doctors).) (3) Person Directed Abuse (e.g., Content which directs negativity against an identifiable person, who is either part of the conversation thread or is named. Person-directed abuse includes serious character based attacks, such as accusing the person of lying, as well as aggression, insults and menacing language.) and (4) Counter Speech (e.g., Content which challenges, condemns or calls out the abusive language of others.). Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].

[Q]: I don't comment to get replied to or expect a thank you, when I write something lenghty and thought out I just send it and forget about it. But I get what OP is saying because every once in a while I like to go through my post history (I think I'm fuckin hilarious lmao, I can read something I've posted a couple weeks ago and still think I'm funny hahahaha) but when I see a post that I took a long time to write that is buried in a thread with just my own upvote, or in threads where the OP hasn't replied to anyone, or to many people but not me, stuff like that, I get kinda bummed out.    On the other hand I love seeing the inbox button lit up and it turning out to be a thoughtful comment that makes me think a reply through so it balances out, but if reddit was just people who don't reply I'd bother a lot less and end up deleting before sending much more often than I do now (and I do it quite often)
[A]: no


[Q]: I'm guessing this happens because, while many gay people do agree with fluidity of sexuality, we are also often told we just need to 'find the right person' etc and it causes them to get defensive. I know that you are right, but I still get upset if someone tells me I just need to find the right man because the intention is usually to dismiss my sexuality, while your intention was just to share information.
[A]: no


[Q]: Reminds me of the stone toss dog comic.
[A]:
yes


