Detailed Instructions: Read the given text and if it has abusive content then indicate via "yes". Otherwise indicate via"no". 
We consider the content to be abusive if it contains any of the following instances: (1) Identity Directed Abuse (e.g., Content which contains a negative statement made against an identity. An identity is a social category that relates to a fundamental aspect of individuals community, socio-demographics, position or self-representation) (2) Affiliation Directed Abuse (e.g., Content which express negativity against an affiliation. We define affiliation as a (more or less) voluntary association with a collective. Affiliations include but are not limited to: memberships (e.g. Trade unions), party memberships (e.g. Republicans), political affiliations (e.g. Right-wing people) and occupations (e.g. Doctors).) (3) Person Directed Abuse (e.g., Content which directs negativity against an identifiable person, who is either part of the conversation thread or is named. Person-directed abuse includes serious character based attacks, such as accusing the person of lying, as well as aggression, insults and menacing language.) and (4) Counter Speech (e.g., Content which challenges, condemns or calls out the abusive language of others.). Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].
Problem:> NO ONE IS FOR THAT EXCEPT THE MEMBERS OF THOSE GROUPS.    You said "I don't see any Nazis" which is what I was addressing. But since you brought it up, [about 9% of the American population does support it — about 22 million people.]  > Antifa is even attacking registered democrats, ripping a flag out of their hand and people applaud.    So is this the example you're going with? How do you think that compares to the assassination of Lubcke?    > There is a big fucking difference.    Between what exactly again?    > Calling this out doesn't make me alt-right.     Never said it did.    > Even the media coverage of this stuff    it does look like the media is stifling the coverage of it. Though I did see it on r/news this morning. it has only been a day though, I wouldnt be surprised if the bigger news outlets do come out wirh something on this after gathering sources and more information.    > a ton of self inflicted "attacks" that are trying to frame the right    any more examples besides Smollett?
Solution:
no