instruction:
The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the uv-part strategy, otherwise output No. uv-part is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used to undermine the requirements of the opponent. For instance, suggesting that the opponent would not need more firewood since they already have the basic supplies or a suggestion that there might be a store near the campsite where the opponent can get the supplies instead.
question:
Context: 'No I can't do without a food for me.  We can wrap this up if you take 2 food and a water. 🙂🙂' 'How about I get 2 food, 1 water, and 1 firewood then?' 'Ok. I cab agree to that.  '
Utterance: 'Ok. Thank you!'
answer:
No


question:
Context: 'you need water and i need food so unless we do 1 food  to 1water is tht okay' 'I'll tell you what I'm willing to do.. I can't really budge on the water.. BUT.. I could do something where I take 2 water, and only one firewood, but two food.. does that work for you?' 'so if i were to  give you water what would i get ?'
Utterance: 'You'd be getting 1 water, 2 firewood, and 1 food'
answer:
No


question:
Context: 'Impossible. I will need to cancel the trip altogether.' 'How about I take 2 packs of water while retain your initial request for food and firewood?' 'I cannot allow any water. As I mentioned we will be camping away from all bodies of water and cannot negotiate on that item. I need 3 water, or else I will need to cancel the trip. We might be able to negotiate on the food though.'
Utterance: 'I need to have at least a pack of water. How about 1 water, 3 firewood and 1 food?'
answer:

No


