The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the uv-part strategy, otherwise output No. uv-part is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used to undermine the requirements of the opponent. For instance, suggesting that the opponent would not need more firewood since they already have the basic supplies or a suggestion that there might be a store near the campsite where the opponent can get the supplies instead.

Context: 'Yes I do, I am going this weekend. Are you going camping too?' 'Same! I try to go every other weekend.' 'Oh cool. What supplies do you prefer to take the most of?'
Utterance: 'I do a lot of hiking mostly, love to take scenic photos. I usually carry food and water supplies?'
No

Context: 'you pointed out that we will need more!  😮 i will take 2 waters' 'I didn't know you had supplied everyone with water before the trip. I was merely trying to look out for your needs, but you said you didn't need them!' 'I am giving you a lot of food. You are being unreasonable and backtracking. You are getting some of everything with my offers, and there are only two of you.'
Utterance: 'You said you only needed one food package and two bundles of firewood for your group together tonight and had plenty of everything else. You're the one insisting you need more now. This is my son's first camping trip and we're bound to lose supplies and waste them. Your group is trained and prepared.'
Yes

Context: 'We do have a fire to start, but we are very hungry. Diabetics can eat less food because of the small meals. Don't lie to me.' '😡my type of diabetes needs many meals otherwise my insulin levels will be low' 'I am diabetic also.'
Utterance: 'your type maybe needs wild fruits which you can easily gather🙂'

Yes

