We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

[EX Q]: Sent1: it has been proven time and again prisons don't rehabilitate, keeping someone in prision for their entire life in prision is less human than the death penalty.
 Sent2: First, it is more expensive than sentencing someone to life in prison.
[EX A]: Not similar

[EX Q]: Sent1: I dont think the death penalty should be apllied in just any case.
 Sent2: I think the death penalty should only be used in extreme cases where the accused is, without a doubt, guilty.
[EX A]: Similar

[EX Q]: Sent1: Last time I checked, killing doesn't bring persons back to life, so the only reason for the death penalty seems to be revenge.
 Sent2: With all that it has been a very trying time for me and I have had to struggle with how I really felt about the death penalty.
[EX A]:
Not similar

