Read the given text and if it has abusive content then indicate via "yes". Otherwise indicate via"no". 
We consider the content to be abusive if it contains any of the following instances: (1) Identity Directed Abuse (e.g., Content which contains a negative statement made against an identity. An identity is a social category that relates to a fundamental aspect of individuals community, socio-demographics, position or self-representation) (2) Affiliation Directed Abuse (e.g., Content which express negativity against an affiliation. We define affiliation as a (more or less) voluntary association with a collective. Affiliations include but are not limited to: memberships (e.g. Trade unions), party memberships (e.g. Republicans), political affiliations (e.g. Right-wing people) and occupations (e.g. Doctors).) (3) Person Directed Abuse (e.g., Content which directs negativity against an identifiable person, who is either part of the conversation thread or is named. Person-directed abuse includes serious character based attacks, such as accusing the person of lying, as well as aggression, insults and menacing language.) and (4) Counter Speech (e.g., Content which challenges, condemns or calls out the abusive language of others.). Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].

Example Input: Mayos do more shootings, sky is blue, more at 11
Example Output: yes

Example Input: Females are more likely than males to socially exclude others, a sex difference that appears as early as the age of six. (Benensen, 2013)    Historically, there has been strong concern about gossiping by females. Females display an especially strong interest in information about other females as evidenced by data from social media. (McAndrew 2014)  On Twitter, 61.3% of misogynistic tweets containing the terms "slut" or "whore" come from female users. Women are interrupted the most by other women. Men only interrupt women slightly more often than other men.(Hancock 2014)    High-ranked women are ~20-30% less generous and less sharing than high-ranked men (d ≈ .5, N = 375). (Markovits 2017)    Men cooperate much more than women in repeated Prisoner's Dilemma games. (Colman 2018) Women engage in indirect aggression and slut-shaming, even in clinical research studies. Female job satisfaction is lower under female supervision (no difference for males). (Artz, 2016) Women are reporting increasing levels of incivility at work. Female superiors are more likely to be critical of female subordinates (queen bee syndrome). High-ranking women are less likely to collaborate with same-sex subordinates.(Gabriel 2018)  Women's automatic in-group bias (the preference for their own sex) is 4.5x as strong as men's. (Goodwin 2004)    TLDR: It's all over for Woman.
Example Output: yes

Example Input: Guess i'll die
Example Output:
no

