In this task, you will be shown a sentence, and you should determine whether it is overruling or non-overruling. In law, an overruling sentence is a statement that nullifies a previous case decision as a precedent by a constitutionally valid statute or a decision by the same or higher ranking court which establishes a different rule on the point of law involved. Classify your answers into overruling or non-overruling

Q: people v chambers, 430 mich 217, 222; 421 nw2d 903 (1988).

A: non-overruling
****
Q: we hereby disapprove of merendino v. burrell, 923 s.w.2d 258, 261 (tex. app.  beaumont 1996, writ denied), and miller v. cozart, 394 s.w.2d 22, 24 (tex.civ.app.  dallas 1965, no writ), to the extent that they hold that a person who owns or is otherwise responsible for horses has a duty to prevent the horses from roaming onto a farm-to-market road that is free from a local stock law.

A: overruling
****
Q: we have concluded that the holdings in wyman, spillers, evangelical, supra, and their progeny, should be overruled and a new sense of direction established.

A:
overruling
****
