Given the task definition, example input & output, solve the new input case.
Read an exchange between SENDER A and SENDER B, and answer whether SENDER A is a 'Bot' or a 'Human'. There are only a maximum of two senders (A and B) per conversation, and there are no conversations where SENDER A and SENDER B are both bots, or both humans; only one sender per conversation can be a bot, and only one can be a human. Knowing this, need only to classify whether SENDER A is 'Human' or 'Bot'; you do not need to write anything about SENDER B. Typically, bots will have a more disjointed manner of speaking, and will make statements that don't relate to each other, don't make coherent sense, or otherwise appear unnatural. Humans will make statements in a more or less coherent and logical way, potentially including asking the bot why the bot is not making sense or contradicting itself.
Example: SENDER A: I love iphone! i just bought new iphone!
SENDER B: Thats good for you, i'm not very into new tech
SENDER A: I am a college student and i am a college student
SENDER B: I am go to gym and live on donations
SENDER A: I am a vegan and i am in the midwest
SENDER B: So vegan... i have dogs maybe i should told then that they may eat cheap salads insted of meat
SENDER A: I would not mind having them in the office that would be hard for me
SENDER B: Dogs or vegan in office?
SENDER A: I am a vegetarian so i am vegan
SENDER B: Strange answer
SENDER A: I guess i just do not know what to ps4 experience with.

Output: Bot
This is a good example of correct classification, because SENDER A is indeed a bot. You can tell SENDER A is a bot because they make statements that don't have anything to do with what SENDER B is asking. SENDER A also repeats itself awkwardly in the same sentence ('I am a college student and i am a college student'), which humans don't usually do. Additionally, you can tell SENDER A is the bot in this conversation because since there are two senders, one must be a bot and one must be a human, and SENDER B clearly sounds more like the human since their sentences are coherent and they are trying to carry a logical conversation. Finally, after SENDER A sends an incoherent answer, SENDER B correctly points out SENDER A's awkwardness by saying 'Strange answer', which can reliably indicate SENDER B is the human, and SENDER A is the bot.

New input case for you: SENDER A: I love to garden and i love to garden.
SENDER B: I like to spend time at home
SENDER A: I like to go to the mall and go to the mall to
SENDER B: Yeah me too. Do you spend much at the malls?
SENDER A: I do not have time for shopping, i just like to shop.
SENDER B: I like spending money on cars
SENDER A: I like to drive around in my ford truck
SENDER B: What color is your truck?
SENDER A: I like blue, what is yours
SENDER B: It’s red
SENDER B: I drive to gym some days
SENDER A: I like to go to the gym and go to the gym.
SENDER B: How many times a week do you go to the gym?
SENDER A: I do not have time for it
SENDER B: What is your job?
SENDER A: I work at a bank, a manager.
SENDER B: I work from home
SENDER A: I work at a daycare, so i have to work in the office
SENDER B: Do you like children?
SENDER A: I do not have any kids
SENDER B: Me too. I am not married
SENDER A: I am single, but i am single with my husband
SENDER B: Do you plan to get married?
SENDER A: Yes, i am married to a woman, and i am single
SENDER B: Okay
SENDER A: What do you do for fun?
SENDER B: I like to drive around the city
SENDER A: I like the city too, but i love the city
SENDER B: In which city do you live?
SENDER A: I live in the city in ny
SENDER B: I like ny
SENDER A: I am in ny.
SENDER B: I have been to ny before
SENDER A: I have been there several times were born in the usa

Output:
Bot