Detailed Instructions: Read the given text and if it has abusive content then indicate via "yes". Otherwise indicate via"no". 
We consider the content to be abusive if it contains any of the following instances: (1) Identity Directed Abuse (e.g., Content which contains a negative statement made against an identity. An identity is a social category that relates to a fundamental aspect of individuals community, socio-demographics, position or self-representation) (2) Affiliation Directed Abuse (e.g., Content which express negativity against an affiliation. We define affiliation as a (more or less) voluntary association with a collective. Affiliations include but are not limited to: memberships (e.g. Trade unions), party memberships (e.g. Republicans), political affiliations (e.g. Right-wing people) and occupations (e.g. Doctors).) (3) Person Directed Abuse (e.g., Content which directs negativity against an identifiable person, who is either part of the conversation thread or is named. Person-directed abuse includes serious character based attacks, such as accusing the person of lying, as well as aggression, insults and menacing language.) and (4) Counter Speech (e.g., Content which challenges, condemns or calls out the abusive language of others.). Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].
Problem:Some of these are tiny groups or even individuals, **NO ONE IS FOR THAT EXCEPT THE MEMBERS OF THOSE GROUPS**. Antifa is even attacking registered democrats, ripping a flag out of their hand and people applaud. There is a big fucking difference. Calling this out doesn't make me alt-right. Even the media coverage of this stuff, Gizmodo, super outspoken for journalist rights and reports of violent acts of the "alt right", but have not said a word about Andy Ngo. This is a clear reporting bias, these people are not reporting news anymore. They're pushing their ideals.     There are even a ton of self inflicted "attacks" that are trying to frame the right. Jessie Smollett might not be the first, but sure as fuck the more visible because he's a celebrity. There is a very clear over-reaction to Trump (and this is coming from someone who voted Bernie in the primaries and then Hillary in the election). When the reaction to the bad not anything better, you're doing something wrong and it's time to look in the mirror if you're looking for an enemy.
Solution:
yes