We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Q: Sent1: The people dying from the death penalty are guilty people who have taken the lives of others.
 Sent2: Among other things, what does it say about us as a society if we kill people who not only reform there own lives, but the lives of many others?

A: Not similar
****
Q: Sent1: The death penalty was included in that "law."
 Sent2: Depending on that state's laws, if you're going to apply the death penalty, I find the death penalty appropriately applied to this case.

A: Not similar
****
Q: Sent1: Unless there can be solid uncontestable evidence shown that the death penalty is significant in deterring crime, this cannot be used as an argument for the death penalty.
 Sent2: The death penalty has never been shown to be a deterent to murder.

A:
Similar
****
