You will be given a definition of a task first, then an example. Follow the example to solve a new instance of the task.
You will be given a context and a verb separated with a newline character, and you have to answer if the given verb can be anchored in time or not. We say a verb can be anchored in the real timeline if and only if a verb happened in the past, is happening now, or is guaranteed to happen in the future. The output should be "Yes" if the verb can be anchored in time and "No" otherwise.

It was followed by Denmark, Norway, Germany, France, Greece, Luxembourg, Spain, Britain, the United States, Iceland, Belgium, Italy, Portugal and Turkey. NATO decided at last year's Madrid summit to (invite) the three eastern European countries to start accession talks.  
 Verb: invite
Solution: No
Why? This is a good example. The "invite" is not anchorable. Although NATO decided to invite them, they haven't invited them yet, and it's not guaranteed to happen in the future. They might change their decision later.

New input: Kopp, meanwhile, may have approached the border with Mexico, but it is unknown whether he crossed into that country, said Freeh. Kopp purports to be a devout Roman Catholic, and the majority of jobs he has held over the past 20 years have been related to the anti-abortion movement, the Justice Department (said) in a news release.  
 Verb: said
Solution:
Yes