Here are some reviews for a movie: 1. One of the summer's more pleasant surprises.
2. Brendan gets hit in the face a lot, that's good for a few laughs but you've already seen it in the trailer.
3. Dudley is merely a dud.
4. Barely gets a plus for comedy, but Brendan Fraser is always fun to see.
5. '90s live-action remake of '60s cartoon has iffy humor.
6. Surprisingly pleasant.
7. The fanciful associations and bad jokes are more often stupid than silly, making all the spectacle and contrived dance numbers seem a colossal waste.
8. Why in the wide, wide, world of sports would anybody make a big-budget feature film from a decades-old, animated cartoon parody of Nelson Eddy/Jeanette MacDonald movies?
9. Only for little kids or anyone with no discerning taste.
10. There's not one joke, one slapstick moment, one innuendo that's funny.

Here is the consensus of critics:Gags aren't that funny.

Here are some reviews for a movie: 1. There's nothing magical about the romance in Autumn in New York, and nothing even very tragic about its love affair.
2. Autumn in New York is saddled with a sappy, silly script.
3. Ryder looks like she doesn't want to be anywhere near Gere, no less have him touch her.
4. A perfectly respectable weeper.
5. This love story never convincingly goes beyond the depth of two good-looking people falling in love based on their looks.
6. Hardly the all-stops-out tearjerker it strives to be.
7. A diaphanous daydream of clichés, predictable developments, strained romance, and frequently embarrassing dialogue.
8. The movie's biggest fatality is the lack of chemistry between the two stars. Even in their most amorous moments, they seem like a randy uncle and his sad-eyed niece.
9. A throwback to conventional soap-opera romance which would be fortunate to find an enthusiastic audience on afternoon TV.
10. Finally ... the melodrama does take over.

Here is the consensus of critics:Although the film isn't as bad as feared (it wasn't pre-screened for reviews), it's not that good, either. Most noticable flaws are the sappy romantic cliches and lack of chemistry between Gere and Ryder.

Here are some reviews for a movie: 1. It's a cracking yarn rippingly told. If it's havoc you want wreaked on Hitler's goosestepping invaders, then take it to the Max.
2. If there's nothing distinctly 'Norwegian' about the way that Max Manus is filmed, it's still an enjoyable and illuminating action adventure.
3. An entertaining, old-school war thriller.
4. So this overdue homage to Max Manus: Man of War is a powerful surprise.
5. It's perhaps a little too polite at times, but Rřnning and Sandberg's well-crafted picture does a good job of celebrating a man whose endeavours ought to be recognised by all of the Allied powers.
6. Though not without its moments, this latest tale of wartime derring-do rarely dares to enter uncharted territory.
7. A stirring tribute to the wartime sacrifices made in the name of a just cause.
8. It's lively, sturdily mounted, just ever so slightly jejune.
9. It's meticulously researched as regards period detail, and the whole thing is full of excitement and suspense.
10. Bandidas directors Joachim Roenning and Espen Sandberg employ impressive production values and a blockbuster sensibility here, nailing the suspense.

Here is the consensus of critics:This good old-fashioned Norwegian WW2 film has impressive set pieces and never suffers for a lack of suspense.

Here are some reviews for a movie: 1. Days of Glory is -- disappointingly, but not unsurprisingly -- a dull, plodding war film bursting with noble intentions, but ultimately wearing its agenda a bit too much on its sleeve.
2. The movie is more about what happens between the battles than during them. It's the plight of the men, fighting for an army that considers them second-class citizens, that raises Days of Glory above your average war movie.
3. The soldiers who battled the Nazis were, indeed, brave men, but this turgid hunk of fromage is not a worthy tribute to them.
4. It's a war movie burning with discontent, a moving reminder of the sacrifices that Algerian Muslim infantrymen made for a motherland that treated them abominably.
5. The Algerian entrant for the Best Foreign Language Film Oscar lacks the punch and imagination of its competition.
6. The movie plods along rather deliberately until the climactic confrontation at the end ---- then the action becomes riveting.
7. This movie is much better than 'Flags of Our Fathers' and every bit as good as 'Letters From Iwo Jima'.
8. There's definitely something in the air, as Flags of Our Fathers, Letters From Iwo Jima and now Days of Glory (cursed new title and all) have been trying to erode that formal spit and polish we associate with The Greatest Generation.
9. Days of Glory has good intentions and a well-executed combat scene, but it could do with more originality.
10. A sad depiction of how courageous North African soldiers fighting for France during World War II were treated shabbily by their superiors.

Here is the consensus of critics:
Days of Glory is a powerful historical epic that pays homage to a valiant group of soldiers whose sacrifices have largely been forgotten.