We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gay Marriage) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gay marriage. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gay marriage.

[Q]: We're just saying that they don't deserve "tax exempt" status if they are going to stray from the real reason that they are supposed to be "tax exempt" in the first place.
[A]: Invalid


[Q]: As I've said many times already, there are more similarities when it comes to gay marriage, to all other legal marriages.
[A]: Valid


[Q]: FFC basically says that one state must recognize the marriages of other states and DOMA basically says "states don't have to recognize gay marriages of other states".
[A]:
Valid


