You are given first 5 messages from a series of message exchanges between 2 persons playing the game of Diplomacy which is an American strategic board game. You need to generate the next message. The message should be generated such that it fits the context seen so far. Avoid the text that is (i) tangent to the context, (ii) repeats the context.

[Q]: ["Hi Germany--it seems our paths are finally crossing! \nI'm guessing England has made plans with you for the two of you to take over russia. Especially if you help England into Moscow, I can't help but notice that England's territory is starting to...surround yours. That doesn't make for a good partnership. I, on the other hand, would pose little threat to you in Moscow and could help keep England at bay in the North/Baltic. \nI'm open to negotiation if you are!", 'Hey Turkey, nice to finally meet you! I’m definitely open to negotiation. The problem at the moment is that it seems like Russia is going to support England into Moscow. So even if I support you, you’d bounce and I can’t afford to have England after me just for that', 'I’m not sure what your relationship with Austria has been so far. He’s been cooperative with me. However, he seemed so single minded about getting rid of Russia...I can’t tell what he wants to do next', "Austria and I have been working together solely on taking down Russia, so I'm not sure of their long term plans either...and I haven't heard from A since winter.\n\nI understand about not supporting me into Moscow, and I appreciate the tip about Russia. Could I perhaps just get an agreement from you not to block me moving to Ukraine?", 'Ok, that’s what it seemed like. I can agree to that!']
[A]: Are you still interested in Moscow?


[Q]: ['Greetings, Czar.  How are things in Russia?', 'Have you been able to gather anything from Austria or Turkey?', 'I’m willing to work with you in the East, let me know if I can be of assistance', 'Not yet - we have to actually process a couple moves before I can gather any dots from them.\nOh, you meant information.  Turkey\'s not super talkative, seems to be looking at traditional boring Turkish openings.  Austria strikes me as the kind of guy who probably messages every person on the board with an opening proffer of "Hey!  Do you want to ally against <mutual neighbor>?"', 'Yes, I’ve only gathered the same from both of them. I suppose their dynamics will be more clear after a few moves. Let’s keep each other updated']
[A]: Have you and Turkey agreed to anything as far as how to split up Austria?


[Q]: ['Hey Russia, would you be open to not moving an army north? I’m not interested in taking StP', 'Austria is pushing Italy to not do a lepanto but to go west. That might mean that Turkey is going north with Austria.', 'Thanks for the info! I trust that you  don’t want to take StP, an army north could help me put you into Norway though', 'I’ll be ok in Norway without your army in StP. I view A Mos - StP in spring 1901 as a strong anti-England move and building F StP(nc) as equally anti-England', 'Are we still good up north? I’m not interested in fighting you right now, and would prefer to just use a fleet to capture Nrwy.\n\nCan you promise to not send Mos northward this turn?']
[A]:
Of course, I wasn't trying to be  sneaky with my suggestion. I understand your concern and will not move StP North.


