We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

Ex Input:
"We could even grant animals a right to bring suit without insisting that animals are persons, or that they are not property," Sunstein said on page 11 of Animal Rights: Current Debates and New Directions (2004).

Ex Output:
Invalid


Ex Input:
One can only speculate that the ban made crime skyrocket.

Ex Output:
Valid


Ex Input:
For Madison, a bill of rights provided a second chance for his pet project: to obtain the congressional veto of state laws that he had tried, but failed, to achieve at the 1787 Convention.

Ex Output:

Invalid


