You will be given a context and a verb separated with a newline character, and you have to answer if the given verb can be anchored in time or not. We say a verb can be anchored in the real timeline if and only if a verb happened in the past, is happening now, or is guaranteed to happen in the future. The output should be "Yes" if the verb can be anchored in time and "No" otherwise.

Let me give you an example: It was followed by Denmark, Norway, Germany, France, Greece, Luxembourg, Spain, Britain, the United States, Iceland, Belgium, Italy, Portugal and Turkey. NATO decided at last year's Madrid summit to (invite) the three eastern European countries to start accession talks.  
 Verb: invite
The answer to this example can be: No
Here is why: This is a good example. The "invite" is not anchorable. Although NATO decided to invite them, they haven't invited them yet, and it's not guaranteed to happen in the future. They might change their decision later.

OK. solve this:
It was likely to be opposed by Elian's Miami relatives, who are fighting to keep the boy in the United States and who have said they think Gonzalez is being controlled by Fidel Castro's government. Gonzalez also wrote to Attorney General Janet Reno earlier this week, demanding that Elian be returned to him and (saying) he does not recognize the courts hearing the custody battle.  
 Verb: saying
Answer:
Yes