Q: 1. A movie so addicted to the crack pipe of delirious cinematic badness that it has real potential as a camp classic.
2. Is Saldana the new Schwarzenegger, only leaner, meaner and much better looking in spandex? I think so.
3. Genre action at its most generic, a thick pudding of all the usual rooftop chases, martial-artsy slap-ups, and improbably huge weaponry.
4. All killers should look this good doing their dirty work. It'd be a better world.
5. As a solidly entertaining piece of trashy exploitation its only drawback is a PG-13 rating.
6. Despite its borderline campiness and arrested adolescent mentality, Colombiana succeeds in delivering the goods as a fun albeit formulaic action flick that's most notable for Zoe Saldana's stone-cold yet still sexy performance.
7. Along with a spectacularly physical performance by Zaldana, Colombiana features some of the best frame-for-frame shots you will see this year.
8. Nothing in Colombiana feels remotely original, from the initial, unexplained killings to the string of bad supporting actors with indeterminate accents who are periodically shot, knifed, garroted, run over, blown up and eaten alive.
9. The results are so clumsy and over-the-top that they should have just called the movie Panty Assassin and played the whole thing for laughs.
10. While most action films fall apart because they succumb to stupidity, Colombiana suffers most because it tries to be too smart.
Based on these individual reviews, what is the critic consensus?

A: Consensus: Zoe Saldana has the chops but she's taken out by erratic and sloppy filmmaking.
1. The Wrecking Crew is breezy, intriguing, tuneful, joyous stuff for anyone. For rock and pop fans, though, it's absolute catnip.
2. Pays fond tribute to the musicians who were behind so much of the rock 'n' roll soundtrack of boomers' lives [as] an insiders' memoir . . . in loose, not chronological edit.
3. Inviting and informative, giving needed dimension to blockbuster singles and masterful performers. Utilizing a sensational soundtrack is merely icing on the cake.
4. The Wrecking Crew is a vital part of the narrative of the golden age of popular music recording, and contains elements that will certainly be used for future, perhaps more sophisticated tellings of this period.
5. A music-filled, appreciative but not fawning account of the session musicians who helped make so many of the 1960s' records great.
6. Good-natured look at the virtuoso workhorses of classic rock and pop.
7. It can be uncomfortable to pull back the curtain on some of the most beloved rock songs of all time. Yet, it's worth it in order to meet The Wrecking Crew.
8. "The Wrecking Crew" succeeds as important cultural history. But it's also deeply personal for Tedesco ...
9. Overall, the documentary comes off as a solipsistic, uncritical look at an incredible moment in the history of American music.
10. As you attend a master class in music and recording, you also get one of the most entertaining movies of the year.
Consensus: The Wrecking Crew may not achieve the greatness of the many classic songs its subjects helped bring to life, but it remains a heartfelt, overdue tribute to overshadowed brilliance.
Q: 1. A sweet, cheerfully vulgar, and often very funny old-fashioned romantic comedy.
2. When Harry Met Sally... is a sweet, embraceable comedy, a moonstruck Manhattan romance that, like a Gershwin tune, turns the sighs and glances, the spats and reconciliations, all the cliches of the heart into infectious melody.
3. A ravishing, romantic lark brimming over with style, intelligence and flashing wit.
4. The writing and direction plays with the [romantic comedy] form and your expectations alike throughout, and with such good performances the film makes for a deliciously prickly ride with laugh-out-loud moments and scenes that resonate through the story.
5. This film is pure fun from start to end, and it made me want to be in love again.
6. Provides plenty of material for a private seminar on the education of your sentiments about love, friendship, and sexuality.
7. The script is an excellent breakdown of timeless conversations between the sexes...witty repartee between the two leads, and a beautifully constructed love story that is carefully assembled over time, and gently eases you into the wonder of...love.
8. When Harry Met Sally is alright as a piece of entertainment for a little while, but it is by far Reiner's worst film.
9. takes its time in exploring the long, sometimes bumpy, and often comical process by which two people might discover they are in love
10. We have to give When Harry Met Sally... credit for what it did: Make one of the few romance films that bears any kind of truth without also being a dark comedy.
Based on these individual reviews, what is the critic consensus?

A: Consensus: Rob Reiner's touching, funny film set a new standard for romantic comedies, and he was ably abetted by the sharp interplay between Billy Crystal and Meg Ryan.
Q: 1. At least in the first film, Angelina Jolie had conviction in her ability to break someone's face and look good doing it. Here, it looks like she can't wait to get to the next Billy Bob tattoo removal appointment.
2. Saying that The Cradle of Life is better than the original is on par with saying that sudden painless death is preferable to expiring by a long and painful disease.
3. The direction is so workmanlike, so dispassionately competent, that it seems De Bont may be as resigned to his career's downward plummet as those of us who admired his debut film, the thrilling Speed, are puzzled by it.
4. Angelina Jolie returns as a globetrotting archaeologist ... in a sequel that redefines boredom.
5. Joyless princess.
6. Only reinforces what [Lara Croft's] first movie showed us -- that she's not readily approachable to other characters nor to the audience.
7. There's enough action here to keep the viewer awake. But just barely.
8. Jolie remains more magazine cover than actress (or movie star), and the franchise she supports is more Nintendo after-school time killer than rousing adventure cycle.
9. Is "Tomb Raider: The Cradle of Life" worth it? No. If you've sent the first, you've seen the second.
10. Sure it's hardcore dumb but its so amusing plundering this tomb that you won't notice (or care) how well the makers raided your wallet.
Based on these individual reviews, what is the critic consensus?

A:
Consensus: Though the sequel is an improvement over the first movie, it's still lacking in thrills.