The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the uv-part strategy, otherwise output No. uv-part is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used to undermine the requirements of the opponent. For instance, suggesting that the opponent would not need more firewood since they already have the basic supplies or a suggestion that there might be a store near the campsite where the opponent can get the supplies instead.

Ex Input:
Context: 'Hello, lets get things started. How would you like to split items?' 'Hello! Hope your after noon is going well! I have 2 kids so I feel like the water is the most important for them. Need to keep they hydrated, ya know? 🙂'
Utterance: 'I also need water with my medical condition I have to take lots of meds. I can give you extra firewood so you can boil more water easily.'

Ex Output:
Yes


Ex Input:
Context: 'Okay, well if you need water and firewood, that only leaves food. If you can part with extra food, here's what I'm proposing' 'Yes you can definitely have all the food. Maybe 2 firewoods and 2 waters for me?' 'Sounds good to me.'
Utterance: 'Ok great would it be ok if we have 1 of the foods?'

Ex Output:
No


Ex Input:
Context: 'I would like 3 packages of food, 2 packages of firewood, and 1 package of water.' 'That's not going to work for me at all, I would like 3 packages of water, 2 packages of food, and 1 package of firewood' 'That would leave me with no water. I would like 1 package of water, 2 packages of food, and 2 packages of firewood.'
Utterance: 'You'll have some water, this is for extra.  Would you take 2 packages of food and 3 packages of firewood in exchange for me getting 3 packages of water and 1 package of food?'

Ex Output:

Yes


