We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gay Marriage) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gay marriage. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gay marriage.

It's funny, I haven't seen any studies showing how Jewish people are killing themselves because they can't eat pork, or the Amish because they can't drive a motorcar!
Valid

You can't alter gut or religious feelings with logic, only refute arguments presented with a rational basis, and you so rarely provide any of that, I've given up expecting it of you.
Invalid

To say "I want marriage to be broadened to include MY union" when your union doesn't fit the definition is to say you want marriage to be a broadenable institution to begin with.

Valid

