The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the no-need strategy, otherwise output No. no-need is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used when a participant points out that they do not need an item based on personal context such as suggesting that they have ample water to spare. no-need can directly benefit the opponent since it implies that the item is up for grabs.

Context: 'Ah, so you want some extra water too? I have a lot of lemonade mix for the kids so I'll need water for them.' 'I tend to get dehydrated quickly so if I don't have enough to drink I won't be able to provide everyone with food.' 'Well, we have extra food too. How about I take 2 water, 1 food, and give the res (1 water, 2 food, 3 firewood) to you?'
Utterance: 'That's super thoughtful of you. However, I really need two waters so I can provide for everyone. Once we have enough food and fire we can always go get water from the stream and boil it for the kids.'
No

Context: 'hi, i'm doing good! i really need food quite a bit because my kids are with me on this camping trip' 'okk i will give please explain how many pack you need ' 'that's so kind of you! could I please have 3? which item do you really need, I can give you 3 of it'
Utterance: 'okk i want 3 pack of firewood , 1 pack of food and 1 pack of water'
No

Context: 'I do understand. That will work for me. ' 'Could you tell me about why you want water? ' 'I want water so I can keep hydrated during this camping trip. It's important for me to drink bottled water vs. getting water out at camping as it may flare up my disease. '
Utterance: 'Oh interesting! I have a device that allows me to drink pond/stream water by cleaning it, so water isn't as important to me.'

Yes

