TASK DEFINITION: You are given first 5 messages from a series of message exchanges between 2 persons playing the game of Diplomacy which is an American strategic board game. You need to generate the next message. The message should be generated such that it fits the context seen so far. Avoid the text that is (i) tangent to the context, (ii) repeats the context.
PROBLEM: ["Hey how's it going!? Hoping we can work together in this one. How you feeling about gal this year? Should we bounce there?", "Greetings Austria, nice to make your acquaintance.\n\nThis is definitely a unique game given the time constraints and high stakes. I intend to strike Northwest in an attempt to build a large fleet line extending across the North Atlantic. I need your cooperation to make this work, however. I need you to eliminate Turkey as a threat, and quickly so that I can turn my full attention North. Here is what I propose:\n\nI take RUM, but agree to take no centers South of RUM.\nSpring 1901 I move A MOS-STP\nWe both agree to a total DMZ in GAL\nFall 1901 I will move A WAR North\nI will use any available strength along my Southern border to support you in taking the Balkans and Turkey throughout the game.\n\nI think if we can both maintain trust you and I can hold the majority of centers between the two of us in 1910, and we'll both walk out of this game with the spoils. What do you think?", 'Sounds interesting! What does A War do in the spring?', 'I think A WAR-MOS. It allows me to backfill and on the off chance you do stab me and move to GAL I can bounce WAR in the Autumn then build in WAR, to be frank.', "Ok. So you want to take rum this year with your fleet? You're ok giving up the black sea? Or are you hoping for a DMZ there?"]

SOLUTION: Bounce in the spring, hope for the DMZ in the fall

PROBLEM: ['Greetings, Czar.  How are things in Russia?', 'Have you been able to gather anything from Austria or Turkey?', 'I’m willing to work with you in the East, let me know if I can be of assistance', 'Not yet - we have to actually process a couple moves before I can gather any dots from them.\nOh, you meant information.  Turkey\'s not super talkative, seems to be looking at traditional boring Turkish openings.  Austria strikes me as the kind of guy who probably messages every person on the board with an opening proffer of "Hey!  Do you want to ally against <mutual neighbor>?"', 'Yes, I’ve only gathered the same from both of them. I suppose their dynamics will be more clear after a few moves. Let’s keep each other updated']

SOLUTION: Have you and Turkey agreed to anything as far as how to split up Austria?

PROBLEM: ["Greetings!  I'd like to keep our options open for working together, I think Austria-Turkey can be a strong early game partnership.  And, with the right conditions - a mid to end game one as well.  Best of luck with regards to Galicia and Trieste, I can let you know if I hear anything.", 'Hi Turkey, Sounds good. Turkey is close to my heart and I know it can be a very strong ally', 'We could always both get 2 builds and stymie Russia. In this scenario, I would only ever build fleets. Obviously it depends on what our neighbors do, but could you trust me that Greece would be a walk-in?', 'Greece may be a stretch. I do need to watch what Italy does.', "I know, and it's always lovely to promise Turkey support into Rumania and then just let him bounce against Russia while you guarantee Greece.  But if you'd like to work together the trust needs to start at some point between us."]

SOLUTION:
I'm sorry, I must've misunderstood your intentions. I thought you meant for me to walk into Greece unsupported

