Given the task definition and input, reply with output. In this task, you will be shown a sentence, and you should determine whether it is overruling or non-overruling. In law, an overruling sentence is a statement that nullifies a previous case decision as a precedent by a constitutionally valid statute or a decision by the same or higher ranking court which establishes a different rule on the point of law involved. Classify your answers into overruling or non-overruling

prystash v. state, 3 s.w.3d 522, 531 (tex. crim. app. 1999) (applying invited-error doctrine to jury instructions in capital murder case and stating that ""[t]he doctrine of invited error is properly thought of, not as a species of waiver, but as estoppel""); see also 5 c.j.s., appeal & error  872 (""an appellant or plaintiff in error is estopped, or will not be permitted, to take advantage of errors for the commission of which he or she is responsible . . . or . . . has invited or induced the trial court to commit.""). others suggest it is grounded in waiver or ""the common sense view that where a party invites the trial court to commit error, he cannot later cry foul on appeal."" united states v. brannan, 562 f.3d 1300, 1306 (11th cir. 2009).

non-overruling