In this task, you will be shown a sentence, and you should determine whether it is overruling or non-overruling. In law, an overruling sentence is a statement that nullifies a previous case decision as a precedent by a constitutionally valid statute or a decision by the same or higher ranking court which establishes a different rule on the point of law involved. Classify your answers into overruling or non-overruling

[EX Q]: because there was admissible evidence to support the accusation that beavers possessed a firearm while he was a convicted felon in violation of north carolina law, which constituted a violation of the conditions of his probation, we disagree that the evidence was insufficient to support the trial court's revocation of his probation.
[EX A]: non-overruling

[EX Q]: summary judgment may be granted only when there are no genuine issues of material fact to be litigated, and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of   law.
[EX A]: non-overruling

[EX Q]: in that 1) brashier has engendered confusion on attorney fee recoverability in um/uim litigation by an insured against his/her insurer; 2) brashier does support insurer's argument that the attorney fee issue should have been submitted to the jury for resolution as an element or item of damage under barnes' tort theory of recovery; 3) brashier misinterpreted the import of christian, supra as to the potential for the recovery of attorney fees in um/uim litigation between an insured and his/her insurer; and 4) brashier, in our view, exhibited an unwarranted deviation from the american rule concerning the allowance of attorney fees, we decide in this case that brashier, to the extent it held a um/uim insured plaintiff is entitled to recover attorney fees as a common law element of damage for an insurer's bad faith refusal to settle a um/uim loss, should be overruled.
[EX A]:
overruling

