instruction:
The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the no-need strategy, otherwise output No. no-need is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used when a participant points out that they do not need an item based on personal context such as suggesting that they have ample water to spare. no-need can directly benefit the opponent since it implies that the item is up for grabs.
question:
Context: 
Utterance: 'Hello!  It will be so nice to go camping and spend some time in nature during this stressful time.'
answer:
No


question:
Context: 'your dogs could probably hunt for something for you guys. and i would be in the would for a very long time ' 'My dogs are like 12 and 15 pounds.  Hopefully they don't get eaten themselves. What about 2 foods, 2 firewood and 1 water for me.  😮' 'hmmmmm not possible. i need the same exact thing. what about i get 2 foods, 1 firewood and 2 water☹️'
Utterance: 'If you take 2 foods, 1 firewood, and 1 water that's a deal.  Otherwise I need the 2 foods, 1 firewood, and 2 water.  '
answer:
No


question:
Context: 'Hey there how are you?' 'I am fine friend. I need a lot of firewood though. It is freezing' 'I definitely need firewood as well. We didn't anticipate it being as freezing cold as it is at night. There isn't much around us. We've also been using a lot of water, which we could use more of since we've been looking for firewood.'
Utterance: 'Your needs are like mine. I have a condition that require  me to shower quite often. It is a shame but if I do not shower for 3 hours I will stink.  '
answer:

No


