We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

They didn't shoot someone because they were criminals, they because criminals because they shot someone, Your point boils down to 'Laws do not work because people disobey them-we should have no laws'.
Valid

The fact that you've committed murder is irrelevant and the only thing that matters is if a person has a gun?
Valid

It is always interesting that gun haters throw out the nuke and missile scare tactic every time a person defends no limits on the right to bear arms.

Valid

