We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

Example Input: Not only will the criminals still have access to guns, but they will also have the added knowledge that either the person they intend to rob does not have a gun or they are breaking the law.
Example Output: Valid

Example Input: Gun control activists love to point out any time the NRA or other organizations oppose any firearms restrictions, but often fail to point out when these same groups offer support.
Example Output: Valid

Example Input: I have trouble believing that these guys, who had just overthrown a tyranical government and who ALL owned military rifles were drafting an amendment to the constitution that would prohibit future generations of Americans from having the same individual rights.
Example Output:
Valid

