Q: 1. Should by rights swim in hokiness, but it's a bumptious classic.
2. Filled with enough stock characters and B-film plotlines for a dozen mediocre Westerns.
3. It's like a colossal buffet: You take what you want and leave the rest, readily forgiving the worst of it because the best just tastes so good.
4. Called "revisionist" upon release in a bizarre misuse of the term, Silverado is neither something new nor something paying homage but rather a hollow facsimile
5. Real rewards of the film are in the visuals and rarely has the West appeared so alive, yet unlike what one carries in his mind's eye. Ida Random's production design is thoroughly convincing in detail.
6. Agreeable but never compelling.
7. A big stampede of a movie with ideas and scenes thundering off in dozens of directions.
8. Engrossing western which inspired a huge genre revivial.
9. A terrific western with a superb cast
10. Kasdan resorts to a TV-like shorthand, substituting shtick for personality.
Based on these individual reviews, what is the critic consensus?

A: Consensus: Boasting rich detail and well-told story, Silverado is a rare example of an '80s Hollywood Western done right.
1. Keira Knightley gives one of her most nuanced performances, showing extraordinary range without ever coming across as showy... This is a well crafted, enjoyable ensemble piece with a captivating conclusion.
2. Suspenseful though it is, the movie is quiet to the point of being sleepy, and Worthington is simply not working out as a screen star.
3. Tadjedin shows an intimate understanding of how couples communicate through ellipses and of all that remains unsaid even amid torrents of angry words.
4. Like certain people, this film is pretty and shallow, and a bit of a bore.
5. Will Michael succumb and prove Joanna correct in her suspicions? Will Alex's French accent conquer all? Do you care? I didn't.
6. Massy Tadjedin's intimate directorial debut takes a spare, thoughtful approach to relationships.
7. It's nice to see an intelligent film about adult relationships and the ways that jealousy and insecurity can shred what is otherwise a solid connection between two people.
8. It is far beyond the juvenile time-jumping in Blue Valentine or the old-fogey show tunes nostalgia of any random Nora Ephron movie.
9. A tedious, two-hour crisis of conscience, presenting a myriad of choices - the best of which is to wait and see this on dvd, if at all.
10. The film's characters are stick figures articulating and acting out rote issues of monogamy, loyalty and betrayal.
Consensus: Last Night doesn't opt for easy answers, but the framework and characters overall are too slight and plain to be compelling.
Q: 1. Can a viewer die of excessive cuteness? That's the most concerning question plaguing the otherwise adorable, slight "Shaun the Sheep Movie," which does risk being cloying but mostly moves along with a wry smile on its face.
2. Rarely do things get as inspired as in the 'Wallace & Gromit's. The vibe is one of modesty and relaxation, as though it will settle for a smile permanently plastered on your face rather than sporadic guffaws.
3. Add "Shaun the Sheep Movie" to your list of summer screenings. Ewe'll be glad you did.
4. It has generous lashings of Aardman Animations' trademark warmth, visual inventiveness, and satisfying Claymation tactility.
5. For a film without words, the story speaks volumes.
6. A wordless delight...unfailingly charming and comically inventive.
7. It's a long series of cleverly orchestrated and very successful jokes supported by a very sweet story, and ewe are going to love it.
8. "Shaun the Sheep Movie" may be less elaborate than Aardman masterpieces like "Curse of the Were-Rabbit", but there's still much to enjoy. It's not often you see a cartoon that references both "Night of the Hunter" and "Silence of the Lambs."
9. Even with its stream of visual puns, there's no denying its humongous bleating heart.
10. Clocking in at a slim 85 minutes, the whole thing flies by quite pleasingly, a warm and funny feature that reasserts the value of high quality visuals and attention to detail.
Based on these individual reviews, what is the critic consensus?

A: Consensus: Warm, funny, and brilliantly animated, Shaun the Sheep is yet another stop-motion jewel in Aardman's family-friendly crown.
1. An amiable enough micro-caper which offers savoury titters over out-and-out laughs without ever living up to the concept's comedic potential.
2. If there's something hypocritically coy about a sex comedy without sex (let alone a porn industry without victims), there's also something refreshing about the characters' unabashed good nature -- at least until the grievously saccharine finale.
3. A miscalculated mix of sleaze and schmaltz.
4. Never less than watchable, thanks to its superb cast, but it could and should have been so much better. A sadly wasted opportunity.
5. This film proves that a superb premise and a terrific ensemble cast aren't enough. Writer-director Traeger simply gets it completely wrong.
6. How embarrassing to see an actor of Jeff Bridges's calibre giving his all in such a terrible film. It's a lame comedy which raises only a few facetious groans.
7. You'll notice that the actors are way overqualified for this nonsense. But the kick they get out of one another is what pulls you in.
8. Do not waste your time with The Amateurs.
9. A strong ensemble cast spruces up a weak script in this trifle...the little picture that, ultimately, doesn't.
10. Potential laughs are largely lost due to the one-note nature of the characters.
Consensus: The Amateurs is a largely unfunny sex comedy that squanders a talented cast.
Q: 1. Suffused with clear-eyed affection for its subject and times, this is not your little brother's punk documentary.
2. Joe Strummer: The Future Is Unwritten is a film for fans -- really big fans. More-casual admirers, perhaps those whose only Strummer CD is the Clash's "London Calling," should probably stay away.
3. A remarkably well-detailed doc that proves 'Rock The Casbah' is not just that song from the cell phone commercials.
4. The end result is a documentary that feels very insider and exclusive... it's probably best suited to those who are already fans.
5. Julien Temple has assembled a complex portrait of a human being and the times in which he lived.
6. Temple's film offers a rich, detailed portrait of a commanding but idealistic Strummer against the backdrop of the do-it-yourself punk ethos of the late '70s.
7. The Future Is Unwritten does an ample job of capturing the many facets of Strummer, who was simultaneously self-effacing and and heroic, devoted and calculating, sensitive and brazen.
8. The Future Is Written is a loving testimonial to one of rock's true originals.
9. Joe Strummer: The Future Is Unwritten is that rarest of movie biographies: a warts-and-all exploration of the life and times of its subject.
10. Julian Temple has done cinematic justice to the punk humanist born John Graham Mellor.
Based on these individual reviews, what is the critic consensus?

A:
Consensus: Displaying Joe Strummer warts and all, The Future is Unwritten succeeds as both an engrossing documentary and a comprehensive examination of one of music's most legendary figures.