Given the task definition and input, reply with output. The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the uv-part strategy, otherwise output No. uv-part is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used to undermine the requirements of the opponent. For instance, suggesting that the opponent would not need more firewood since they already have the basic supplies or a suggestion that there might be a store near the campsite where the opponent can get the supplies instead.

Context: 'If I take two waters, 1 firewood, and 2 food supplies, this will help me during the trip. It seems as if you are more skilled than I am on a camping trip. Please consider my request☹️' 'LOL - not a chance.  You're going to have to give me more than that.  I am more skilled and thus need firewood.  How about this...I will take 3 firewood and 2 food.  You can take all the water because you're so non-skilled in the wilderness. I am going to hunt for my food, but again I have a large family.  I am not considering your request  at all.  We will need to come to a decision relatively soon.' 'I understand your preferences. If I take all of the water, 1 firewood, and 2 food your family will still have the opportunity to have a good camping trip and I can learn to survive on this trip. Please consider my request again.☹️'
Utterance: 'Ok - you're not being reasonable at all.  If you're so incompetent at going camping, maybe you should stay home and I can take all the supplies. How's that for an excellent offer?  All for me and 0 for you.'

Yes