The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the uv-part strategy, otherwise output No. uv-part is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used to undermine the requirements of the opponent. For instance, suggesting that the opponent would not need more firewood since they already have the basic supplies or a suggestion that there might be a store near the campsite where the opponent can get the supplies instead.

[Q]: Context: 'I could too, I am a little short on a few things!' 'My biggest concern is water.  I could really use more.  That and some extra food.' 'My biggest concern is food and then water. '
Utterance: 'I'm going to need quite a bit more water, at least 2 packages.  I would like at least 1 food. What do you think?'
[A]: No


[Q]: Context: 'I totally understand that. And it's pretty important, lol ' 'It sure is..So how much food do you need for the trip? Do you need firewood to cook the food? Thank you for understanding my issues. 🙂' 'I definitely need the food the most. I'm definitely not a "hunter", so if I were to run out, I'd be in pretty sad shape. I do need the firewood for both cooking, and keeping warm. It gets cold at night where we're going. How about youself?'
Utterance: 'Well since we were already given a few supplies before this deal, I was wondering if you could give me all 3 water, and I could give you all the firewood and 2 of the food packages. I only say all the water because we already have some and my medical condition sucks. lol I wish we could camp together! we seem to be a good match. lol! 🙂'
[A]: Yes


[Q]: Context: 'Same here. I'll go ahead and list some of what I need and you let me know if you will need the same as well. I need some extra water for our camping trip as well as some additional food. ' 'That sounds reasonable. I don't particularly need the food because I see that as more of a luxury but I could really use some more water. It's supposed to get really really hot on the weekend. 😮' 'I hear that. What do you think of if I take 3 of the food supplies and you can have two waters? '
Utterance: 'That sounds like a fair compromise. I can get food by hunting animals, old school style. That would give you 4 total items. In that case it's only fair if I take all 3 of the firewood. 4 for me and 4 for you sounds like a good deal to me. 🙂'
[A]:
No


