We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gay Marriage) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gay marriage. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gay marriage.

People are also killed because they are of a certain race, religion or even gender every day, and they have civil rights protections, so what would the difference in this case be?
Invalid

I don't particularly care for the idea of "civil unions" because it forms a "separate, but equal" marriage system, that will only lead to continued discrimination.
Valid

Defense of Marriage Act - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Also, if you'll notice, DOMA had strong democratic party support and Bill Clinton, the first black president signed it into law.

Valid

