We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

If there was even a modicum of truth to their insane, illogical beliefs on gun ownership, wouldn���t they have numerous examples of violent outbreaks to point to in all the states that allow people to carry concealed handguns?
Valid

The criminals already have plenty of guns, that means that ending gun ownership will play no real part in ending gun possession by criminals.
Valid

You guys have willed yourselves just as retarded as the people who claimed (And still claim) that the second amendment only conveys a right for the national guard to have weapons.

Valid

