The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the no-need strategy, otherwise output No. no-need is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used when a participant points out that they do not need an item based on personal context such as suggesting that they have ample water to spare. no-need can directly benefit the opponent since it implies that the item is up for grabs.

Context: 'yes i guess you too. i will need more supplies like 3 foods, 2 firewood and1 water' 'I have not really camped before so I am looking for as many supplies as possible.  What about I get 3 food, 3 firewood, and 1 water. ' 'funnny you but no. so what else will i be left with if i give you those. okay let say i get 2 food, 2 firewood and 1 water.'
Utterance: 'I am really bad at cooking so will probably need an extra good just because I'll ruin one of the 3.  Plus Im bringing 2 dogs they can eat the bad food I make 😮  I dont plan on hiking much so how bought I keep all 3 foods, and you keep all 3 waters and we can split the firewood.  2 for me, 1 for you. Great deal!'
Yes