Read the given text and if it has abusive content then indicate via "yes". Otherwise indicate via"no". 
We consider the content to be abusive if it contains any of the following instances: (1) Identity Directed Abuse (e.g., Content which contains a negative statement made against an identity. An identity is a social category that relates to a fundamental aspect of individuals community, socio-demographics, position or self-representation) (2) Affiliation Directed Abuse (e.g., Content which express negativity against an affiliation. We define affiliation as a (more or less) voluntary association with a collective. Affiliations include but are not limited to: memberships (e.g. Trade unions), party memberships (e.g. Republicans), political affiliations (e.g. Right-wing people) and occupations (e.g. Doctors).) (3) Person Directed Abuse (e.g., Content which directs negativity against an identifiable person, who is either part of the conversation thread or is named. Person-directed abuse includes serious character based attacks, such as accusing the person of lying, as well as aggression, insults and menacing language.) and (4) Counter Speech (e.g., Content which challenges, condemns or calls out the abusive language of others.). Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].

I'm guessing this happens because, while many gay people do agree with fluidity of sexuality, we are also often told we just need to 'find the right person' etc and it causes them to get defensive. I know that you are right, but I still get upset if someone tells me I just need to find the right man because the intention is usually to dismiss my sexuality, while your intention was just to share information.
no

I want to argue about transgender people more I feel like we're on the verge of finally settling the issue
no

shouldn't it be ourstory?     I can't breathe    It helps to remember that these people are the minority, and everyone else would laugh at this, too. Bonus sanity in the r/teenagers thread where everyone there was openly mocking the person in the original post.

no

