We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

Ex Input:
My point was that there are ways of dealing with violent criminals, murderers even, without executing them.

Ex Output:
Valid


Ex Input:
Almost like how a liberal will bemoan a corporations concearn for it's share holders over thinking of the damage it does to the environment and shoddly product it pushes onto consumers.

Ex Output:
Invalid


Ex Input:
Again I want to reiterate that I am not in favor of an anarchist society where there is no consequences for committing crimes, my point is that society is better served by life imprisonment than the death penalty.

Ex Output:

Valid


