instruction:
The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the no-need strategy, otherwise output No. no-need is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used when a participant points out that they do not need an item based on personal context such as suggesting that they have ample water to spare. no-need can directly benefit the opponent since it implies that the item is up for grabs.
question:
Context: 'okk i will give please explain how many pack you need ' 'that's so kind of you! could I please have 3? which item do you really need, I can give you 3 of it' 'okk i want 3 pack of firewood , 1 pack of food and 1 pack of water'
Utterance: 'could i have 1 firewood, if you'd like 1 pack food?'
answer:
No


question:
Context: 'Hello, how are you? Looking forward to camping?' 'Oh yeah, that's for sure. What camping item do you prioritize?' 'I'm going to need some extra wood because I'm somewhat injured and can't really gather more.'
Utterance: 'Oh, I see. Well, I personally need lots of water to stay hydrated since I drank a lot already.'
answer:
No


question:
Context: 'Hello, I hope we can work together on an offer that benefits both of us. Do you think it's OK?🙂' 'Yes definitely!  I am pretty easy to work with and would like a deal that will help us both out as much as possible.' ' The item I need the most is water because I need to hydrate to stay strong and achieve my goals. And you?'
Utterance: 'I would say water as well because I am very active and build up thirst as a result.  However, I would be willing to compromise on things to allow you to have more water.'
answer:

No


