instruction:
The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the no-need strategy, otherwise output No. no-need is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used when a participant points out that they do not need an item based on personal context such as suggesting that they have ample water to spare. no-need can directly benefit the opponent since it implies that the item is up for grabs.
question:
Context: 'I do a lot of hiking mostly, love to take scenic photos. I usually carry food and water supplies?' 'Me too. I am not good at hunting or fishing. So I generally try to take extra food' 'Haha I suck at those activities as well. I don't usually don't eat a lot, so I'm happy to exchange some food supplies for water supplies. '
Utterance: 'I would be willing to do that. What do you propose?'
answer:
No


question:
Context: 'I am too.  I am so looking forward to this.  ' 'Yes! I am so on the same page as you. I want to be sure I'm set and prepared. 🙂' 'Would you consider letting me have 2 of the 3 extra firewood?  I have health issues and I get really cold sometimes.☹️'
Utterance: 'Yes, I think that would be very fair, since I don't have health issues myself. Would you allow me to have 2 of the 3 food items? I need energy for hiking. 🙂'
answer:
Yes


question:
Context: 'Good evening, how are you doing today?'
Utterance: 'Welcome to the camping trip Dude!'
answer:

No


