Detailed Instructions: You will be given a context and a verb separated with a newline character, and you have to answer if the given verb can be anchored in time or not. We say a verb can be anchored in the real timeline if and only if a verb happened in the past, is happening now, or is guaranteed to happen in the future. The output should be "Yes" if the verb can be anchored in time and "No" otherwise.
See one example below:
Problem: It was followed by Denmark, Norway, Germany, France, Greece, Luxembourg, Spain, Britain, the United States, Iceland, Belgium, Italy, Portugal and Turkey. NATO decided at last year's Madrid summit to (invite) the three eastern European countries to start accession talks.  
 Verb: invite
Solution: No
Explanation: This is a good example. The "invite" is not anchorable. Although NATO decided to invite them, they haven't invited them yet, and it's not guaranteed to happen in the future. They might change their decision later.

Problem: The location for Friday's ceremony was chosen by Albright, who as secretary of state is the depository of NATO's accession accords. The secretary made the fairly unorthodox decision to choose a site outside Washington because she wanted the ceremony to (resonate) with the memories of President Truman, under whom NATO was founded.  
 Verb: resonate
Solution:
No