instruction:
The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the no-need strategy, otherwise output No. no-need is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used when a participant points out that they do not need an item based on personal context such as suggesting that they have ample water to spare. no-need can directly benefit the opponent since it implies that the item is up for grabs.
question:
Context: 'I don't mind the division but I would like a pack of firewood added because my family of 7 consume this item as well during the day & night' 'you would have to give more items up to get firewood. if you get more water, which is our highest item, i need more of other items' 'How about 1 water, 2 food and 2 firewood?'
Utterance: 'I don't really need food, to be honest. Food is the least of my worries.'
answer:
Yes


question:
Context: 'So I get only 3 packages? 2 food and 1 firewood? ' 'Do you need more firewood?  I could compromise there.' 'How about I get 2 food and 2 firewood? You can get all the water plus 1 food and 1 firewood? '
Utterance: 'Yes that sounds fair.  Deal.  '
answer:
No


question:
Context: 'I'm thinking I'l get 2 firewood, and 2 water and 1 food. I'm not sure what you need, but we can figure it out. ' 'my highest priority is water, i need it to stay hydrated from the camping beers' 'Who doesn't? I need more wood. I'm skinny. I get cold easily. Beer hidrates dude 🙂'
Utterance: 'ha no prob on the wood, its out there in nature so i can do with less of it hows 3 water, 1 food, 0 wood sound'
answer:

Yes


