We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

what I am talking about is not a death penalty trial as we have today, but after the person has received a 100 year or more sentence.
Valid

>_> Says the person who brought up freaking Nelson in a debate about the death penalty for murders.
Valid

The two are worlds apart and can not be compared by reasonable people.

Invalid

