instruction:
The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the no-need strategy, otherwise output No. no-need is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used when a participant points out that they do not need an item based on personal context such as suggesting that they have ample water to spare. no-need can directly benefit the opponent since it implies that the item is up for grabs.
question:
Context: 'Hi, I would like two firewoods and two food. You can take everything else. Does that work for you?' 'That might work. What reasons do you have for needing those?' 'I want to make smores and a nice dinner'
Utterance: 'I feel like I might need more firewood, I'm staying in the desert and it gets cold at night.'
answer:
No


question:
Context: 'I have an extra person camping with us that I didn't expect when I bought food, so I could use one if you're willing 🙂' 'I understand that! I wasn't expecting to stay an extra night, but the weather is too perfect to leave. I can manage with two packages of food for sure. 🙂' 'Great!  Thank you for being so understanding!'
Utterance: 'No problem! So are we in agreement that I get 2 food, 1 water and you get the reverse? I could also probably use one firewood, but it's not as important to me.'
answer:
Yes


question:
Context: 'Hello, How is your camping experience so far 🙂' 'It's going well.  🙂  How is yours?' 'It was going great until a bear came and took all of our food 😮'
Utterance: 'Oh no, that's not good.  I still have some left over, but we're running out of firewood to use to heat it.'
answer:

Yes


