We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

Ex Input:
Not only will the criminals still have access to guns, but they will also have the added knowledge that either the person they intend to rob does not have a gun or they are breaking the law.

Ex Output:
Valid


Ex Input:
To make it otherwise we would need some legislation requiring Mr. Patel to accept firearms at his motel which would survive a constitutional challenge claiming that it: 1.

Ex Output:
Valid


Ex Input:
Previous 9th Circuit rulings, stating that the Second Amendment was purely a tool of government to maintain the National Guard rather than guaranteeing the right of the individual to be armed, were never taken up by the SCOTUS.

Ex Output:

Valid


