Detailed Instructions: Read the given text and if it has abusive content then indicate via "yes". Otherwise indicate via"no". 
We consider the content to be abusive if it contains any of the following instances: (1) Identity Directed Abuse (e.g., Content which contains a negative statement made against an identity. An identity is a social category that relates to a fundamental aspect of individuals community, socio-demographics, position or self-representation) (2) Affiliation Directed Abuse (e.g., Content which express negativity against an affiliation. We define affiliation as a (more or less) voluntary association with a collective. Affiliations include but are not limited to: memberships (e.g. Trade unions), party memberships (e.g. Republicans), political affiliations (e.g. Right-wing people) and occupations (e.g. Doctors).) (3) Person Directed Abuse (e.g., Content which directs negativity against an identifiable person, who is either part of the conversation thread or is named. Person-directed abuse includes serious character based attacks, such as accusing the person of lying, as well as aggression, insults and menacing language.) and (4) Counter Speech (e.g., Content which challenges, condemns or calls out the abusive language of others.). Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].
Problem:I'm sorry if you misunderstood my questions as implications. That's why I asked them. Some people (non-disabled) just want someone to provide for them so they don't have to be adults. (Again, not implying.)    With that being said, I do understand the long haul thing. Of course, we all want that. It's human fucking nature. And it sucks that you got your heart broken. I have too. And for similar reasons.    I read through your posts and I realize you're just ranting, and that this is the place for that. Catharsis is good. But I really was looking for clarification on your point of view.     And to also say like these other folks that I really do get it, and that you're not alone.
Solution:
no