instruction:
The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the no-need strategy, otherwise output No. no-need is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used when a participant points out that they do not need an item based on personal context such as suggesting that they have ample water to spare. no-need can directly benefit the opponent since it implies that the item is up for grabs.
question:
Context: 'Hello' 'Hi there.. how are you doing today?  I hope well!  🙂  So, it looks like we need to divy up these supplies, huh?  Do you have any thoughts on the issue?'
Utterance: 'I'm doing fine thank you, how about you? Well for my trip I'm most interesting in socializing so a great campfire a night would be great, I'd prefer not to boil water either so want extra of that too. Food less so as I will go fishing and know wild vegetables, fruits and mushrooms I can pick. How about you?'
answer:
Yes


question:
Context: 'What if I get 2 food packages and 1 water package....and you would get 1 food package and 2 waters?' 'I think we will need more extra food than that.  How about the reverse, I get 2 food and 1 water and you get 1 food and 2 water.' 'I could do that if I could then get 2 packages of wood as well because it's been bitterly cold this time of year at night in the Alleghenies.'
Utterance: 'That sounds fair.  So I would get 2 food, 1 water, and 1 firewood.'
answer:
No


question:
Context: 'Hi.  I can't do that right now.' 'Is there anything that you might need? ' 'I would be interested in firewood.  Can I ask you, what are your primary concerns on this trip?'
Utterance: 'My primary concerns are staying hydrated, I have been feeling sick and throwing up from being so high up in the mountains. '
answer:

No


