You will be given a definition of a task first, then an example. Follow the example to solve a new instance of the task.
You will be given a context and a verb separated with a newline character, and you have to answer if the given verb can be anchored in time or not. We say a verb can be anchored in the real timeline if and only if a verb happened in the past, is happening now, or is guaranteed to happen in the future. The output should be "Yes" if the verb can be anchored in time and "No" otherwise.

It was followed by Denmark, Norway, Germany, France, Greece, Luxembourg, Spain, Britain, the United States, Iceland, Belgium, Italy, Portugal and Turkey. NATO decided at last year's Madrid summit to (invite) the three eastern European countries to start accession talks.  
 Verb: invite
Solution: No
Why? This is a good example. The "invite" is not anchorable. Although NATO decided to invite them, they haven't invited them yet, and it's not guaranteed to happen in the future. They might change their decision later.

New input: NATO Secretary General Javier Solana says,  The accession of the Czech Republic, Hungary and Poland... is perhaps the clearest demonstration of the fact that Europe is growing closer together.   Extending membership to these three democracies helps to (stabilize) a region that historically has been the staging ground for many of the disasters of this century.   
 Verb: stabilize
Solution:
No