We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.
--------
Question: Lott and Whitley found that not only did such laws not save lives, they cost lives by making it more difficult to have a firearm ready for a sudden emergency.

Answer: Valid


Question: How about you bring an actual debate to the table for once instead of resorting to cheap, underhanded, inflammatory stupidity that contributes nothing and just brings down the average for gun haters everywhere.

Answer: Valid


Question: Perhaps the Supreme Court's approach is a more realistic approach to the Second Amendment in our own day considering the increased risk to public safety that guns pose, but it still is revisionist.

Answer:
Valid


