In this task, you will be shown a sentence, and you should determine whether it is overruling or non-overruling. In law, an overruling sentence is a statement that nullifies a previous case decision as a precedent by a constitutionally valid statute or a decision by the same or higher ranking court which establishes a different rule on the point of law involved. Classify your answers into overruling or non-overruling

for all the foregoing reasons, friesen v. city of glendale, supra, 209 cal. 524, is overruled and lombardy v. peter kiewit sons' co., supra, 266 cal.app.2d 599, is disapproved to the extent that they are inconsistent with the views herein expressed.
overruling

now that this court is reexamining that question, i am satisfied with the conclusion that under our statutory law, the husband has no such right and that gist v. french, supra, should be disapproved.
overruling

to the extent that jure held that the peremptive period of la.r.s. 9:5606 does not begin to run until the conclusion of an appeal in the underlying action and that la.r.s. 9:5606 does not displace the "continuous representation rule" of lima v. schmidt , jure is overruled.

overruling

