Read the given text and if it has abusive content then indicate via "yes". Otherwise indicate via"no". 
We consider the content to be abusive if it contains any of the following instances: (1) Identity Directed Abuse (e.g., Content which contains a negative statement made against an identity. An identity is a social category that relates to a fundamental aspect of individuals community, socio-demographics, position or self-representation) (2) Affiliation Directed Abuse (e.g., Content which express negativity against an affiliation. We define affiliation as a (more or less) voluntary association with a collective. Affiliations include but are not limited to: memberships (e.g. Trade unions), party memberships (e.g. Republicans), political affiliations (e.g. Right-wing people) and occupations (e.g. Doctors).) (3) Person Directed Abuse (e.g., Content which directs negativity against an identifiable person, who is either part of the conversation thread or is named. Person-directed abuse includes serious character based attacks, such as accusing the person of lying, as well as aggression, insults and menacing language.) and (4) Counter Speech (e.g., Content which challenges, condemns or calls out the abusive language of others.). Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].

[EX Q]: Anything with "porn" in it's name that isn't porn is very poorly named.
[EX A]: no

[EX Q]: You would probably either love, or hate, /r/wowthanksimcured         Yeah I think I can appreciate where you are coming from. Thing is - and you state this in your comments - suicide is really bad, and its so bad that the priority for 'prevention' has to override concerns for 'pisses me off'. Personally Im good with messages that are not twee or outright condescending, but I do wonder whether these types of messages may have a place, given, I guess, everyone reacts to these things differently. If these messages save 1 person and mildly irritate 1000 people, they have done their job.          Anyhoo sorry you are in a bad place. Hope things pick up for you soon. In the mean time, great rant!
[EX A]: no

[EX Q]: >any other questions?    So many but I know better than to ask
[EX A]:
no

