The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the no-need strategy, otherwise output No. no-need is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used when a participant points out that they do not need an item based on personal context such as suggesting that they have ample water to spare. no-need can directly benefit the opponent since it implies that the item is up for grabs.

[Q]: Context: 'You can have all of the water if I can have all of the food. I promise that I will bring you back food. I am really good at foraging and I know all about what is edible in a forest 🙂 I want to have two packages of firewood so that I can have a roaring and hot fire going when I come back from being out all day. I am sure that I will find some fish to catch at my water source! 🙂 I'll bring some to back to share with you!' 'Thank you, I would appreciate that and it is very generous of you, Im not a strong hunter or fisher at all :) ' 'Awesome! I think we have a deal! So just to clarify, I will have all the extra food so that I can have strength to forage, you will have all the water, and I will have 2 firewoods so I can have a hot fire for our catch of the day! Are you happy with this, friend? 🙂'
Utterance: 'I do agree with that, I am happy with all of the extra water, and I should be able to get more firewood pretty easily, and since you will be sharing whatever food you find, I think that we came up with a pretty fair split.'
[A]: Yes


[Q]: Context: 'Hey there - looks like we are both going camping!  I'm from the South so firewood and water are a high priority for me.' 'Wow, thats awesome! Yes, I am! Well, that's great because water isn't super important for me. Firewood is though. '
Utterance: 'That sounds awesome - I'm sure we can come to an agreement on how to allocate that works for both of us.  '
[A]: No


[Q]: Context: 'Oh, that does change things a lot. Diabetes is a hard disease to have to deal with. So you want more firewood than water? And less food than water?' 'Well, I don't know.  I think I would like more water than firewood, but yes less food than water.  I'm a pretty easy going person though! 🙂' 'Ok, let me know what you think and we will go from there. I do prefer more food and firewood than water though.'
Utterance: 'Okay, it sounds like we are pretty agreeable here.  I will wait for you to make an offer if you would like to.'
[A]:
No


