We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Sent1: I also don't think someone has been put to death for a third degree murder.
 Sent2: If I ever "murder" someone without cause, I would deserve to die.
Not similar

Sent1: The problem with the death penalty is eventually someone will be sentenced to death when they are in fact guilty.
 Sent2: Acutally, long ago, the executioner was a convict also sentenced to death.
Not similar

Sent1: >_> Says the person who brought up freaking Nelson in a debate about the death penalty for murders.
 Sent2: As it is today, when someone murderers another, the death penalty is considered, as it should be.

Not similar

