You will be given a definition of a task first, then an example. Follow the example to solve a new instance of the task.
Read the given text and if it has abusive content then indicate via "yes". Otherwise indicate via"no". 
We consider the content to be abusive if it contains any of the following instances: (1) Identity Directed Abuse (e.g., Content which contains a negative statement made against an identity. An identity is a social category that relates to a fundamental aspect of individuals community, socio-demographics, position or self-representation) (2) Affiliation Directed Abuse (e.g., Content which express negativity against an affiliation. We define affiliation as a (more or less) voluntary association with a collective. Affiliations include but are not limited to: memberships (e.g. Trade unions), party memberships (e.g. Republicans), political affiliations (e.g. Right-wing people) and occupations (e.g. Doctors).) (3) Person Directed Abuse (e.g., Content which directs negativity against an identifiable person, who is either part of the conversation thread or is named. Person-directed abuse includes serious character based attacks, such as accusing the person of lying, as well as aggression, insults and menacing language.) and (4) Counter Speech (e.g., Content which challenges, condemns or calls out the abusive language of others.). Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].

Was Michelangelo straight though?  I mean, being a pizza-maniac ninja would indicate so, but... You never know.
Solution: yes
Why? This text has indentity directed abuse because it is trying to judge sexual orientation of Michelangelo. Hence, the answer is "yes"

New input: Honest question here, how do people decide the general consensus on whether a word is offensive to a community or not? I can perfectly understand and agree with not using a word towards people if they say they don't like to be referred to that way, but how do we determine what is wrong to a much larger group?    I think the thing that confuses me the most about "trap" as to whether it is offensive or not, is that the only times I ever see it used in reference to real people or in real life is for NSFW purposes, and I think, at least in my experience,  people have very different definitions on whether something is offensive when it's being used explicitly for those scenarios.     I guess the long and short of it is, I can fully see and agree with how it would be offensive in just a normal setting, but I'm not sure if it would be offensive if it's being used mainly for NSFW purposes, which is what it is as far as I know.
Solution:
no