We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

Example Input: Sent1: So your argument is that if the death penalty was cheaper than life in prison it would have the advantage of being cheaper than life in prison.
 Sent2: And no one said that life in prision is "much worse" then the death penalty.
Example Output: Not similar

Example Input: Sent1: The death penalty has been used as a scapegoat for many people who are against executions.
 Sent2: the death penalty is also discriminatory in its application what i mean is that through out the world the death penalty is disproportionately used against disadvantaged people .
Example Output: Not similar

Example Input: Sent1: The jury sees partially false evidence which has been biased by a lawyer and the emotions of the family members, and then convicts an innocent person and sentence him to death.
 Sent2: A life sentence can be reversed if th convicted individual is later found innocent by new evidence.
Example Output:
Not similar

