We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

[EX Q]: Sent1: First, we must choose to use executions because they may save innocent life.
 Sent2: There should no be a death penalty, since by taking a human's life, we are not saving it.
[EX A]: Not similar

[EX Q]: Sent1: If it must be, then we shall find a way to improve these peoples habits, not kill them because they aren't 'like us'.
 Sent2: When a person does something horrible, we no longer see them as a human that values their life, we just see them as an epitome of hate.
[EX A]: Not similar

[EX Q]: Sent1: Capital punishment frees up jail cells: Considering how few people we execute and how many new people enter the prison system each year, I do not see this as being a very good argument.
 Sent2: Well I, as creator of this debate, think that there should not be a death penalty.
[EX A]:
Not similar

