We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

[EX Q]: Sent1: what you are saying is that we should murder people because the prisons are overcrowded.
 Sent2: You said something to the effect of "should we really be giving this man the death penalty?"
[EX A]: Not similar

[EX Q]: Sent1: If a person wasn't convicted then they surely wouldn't be murdered by the state.
 Sent2: The government doesn't have the right to take away someone's life, even in the case of murder.
[EX A]: Not similar

[EX Q]: Sent1: Also, the dates of these crimes point to another point supporting capitol punishment.
 Sent2: Also, please explain how the Supreme Court can logically back up a claim that capital punishment is not a deterrent to capital crime.
[EX A]:
Not similar

