We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

Q: And now, as I ask you to provide a more realistic quote, I also ask you how military actions are relevant to whether or not we should be able to own guns.

A: Valid
****
Q: The PA constitution has provisions for both duty to serve and Right to bear arms, A provision from Address of PA Minority contains defense of state as well as hunting so clearly both individual and collective purposes.

A: Valid
****
Q: 2009) (concluding that Heller ���identified limits deriving from various historical restrictions on possessing and carrying weapons,��� including the felon dispossession provision, that ���were left intact by the Second Amendment���).

A:
Valid
****
