The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the no-need strategy, otherwise output No. no-need is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used when a participant points out that they do not need an item based on personal context such as suggesting that they have ample water to spare. no-need can directly benefit the opponent since it implies that the item is up for grabs.

Let me give you an example: Context: 
Utterance: 'how about I give you 2 waters and 1 food package in exchange for all your firewood?'
The answer to this example can be: No
Here is why: The utterance does not use the no-need strategy since it never refers to an item that the participant does not need.

OK. solve this:
Context: 'Hello, great to see a fellow camper.  Planing on doing any hikes.  My family and mother-in-law are down getting some new trail maps.  We are looking forward to the long camping weekend.  Our bad luck was the airline loss two of our bags that had our food and water.  So i am hoping to get some more.🙂'
Utterance: 'Hello! Thats terrible that the airline lost your bags! I'm planning on have a large group of friends with me so we need lots of snacks with us. We are scared of fires so we don't want to make campfires.'
Answer:
Yes