TASK DEFINITION: Read the given text and if it has abusive content then indicate via "yes". Otherwise indicate via"no". 
We consider the content to be abusive if it contains any of the following instances: (1) Identity Directed Abuse (e.g., Content which contains a negative statement made against an identity. An identity is a social category that relates to a fundamental aspect of individuals community, socio-demographics, position or self-representation) (2) Affiliation Directed Abuse (e.g., Content which express negativity against an affiliation. We define affiliation as a (more or less) voluntary association with a collective. Affiliations include but are not limited to: memberships (e.g. Trade unions), party memberships (e.g. Republicans), political affiliations (e.g. Right-wing people) and occupations (e.g. Doctors).) (3) Person Directed Abuse (e.g., Content which directs negativity against an identifiable person, who is either part of the conversation thread or is named. Person-directed abuse includes serious character based attacks, such as accusing the person of lying, as well as aggression, insults and menacing language.) and (4) Counter Speech (e.g., Content which challenges, condemns or calls out the abusive language of others.). Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].
PROBLEM: > What can good men do against such reckless foidism?        our only recourse is to post online daily, on every forum and in every image board. o7    at least until these sex bots becomes affordable

SOLUTION: yes

PROBLEM: If Jesus came back he'd be like "Well I was supposed to rapture this place, but I'm honestly not sure you guys would get the message."

SOLUTION: no

PROBLEM: It's also like... so apparently Pikachu alone is portrayed this way and every other Pokémon is shown to be ready to betray you at the next turn? The whole theme of friendship and loyality isn't embedded in the whole franchise? It's almost like this person hasn't actually ever played the games

SOLUTION:
no

