We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

Q: Haha, yeah I am agnostic, but it was a little joke I made ;)

A: Invalid
****
Q: Almost like how a liberal will bemoan a corporations concearn for it's share holders over thinking of the damage it does to the environment and shoddly product it pushes onto consumers.

A: Invalid
****
Q: The cost of the present system with reforms recommended by the Commission to ensure a fair process would be $232.7 million per year.

A:
Valid
****
