We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

[Q]: Moreover, states without the death penalty have much lower murder rates.
[A]: Valid


[Q]: >_> Says the person who brought up freaking Nelson in a debate about the death penalty for murders.
[A]: Valid


[Q]: The death penalty is not an act of injustice or additional dysfunction, it is about protecting life from the act of unwarranted aggression.
[A]:
Valid


