We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gay Marriage)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

[EX Q]: Sent1: Even though I have no issue with gays or gay marriage, JP is right - unprotected gay sex is less safe than unprotected heterosexual sex, especially in regards to HIV transmission.
 Sent2: Not so long ago gay sex was considered beyond the pale let alone gay marriage so really morals have nothing to do with the gay marriage debate.
[EX A]: Not similar

[EX Q]: Sent1: when we say should gays be allowed to get "married" we mean, "should they have the right to be allowed official union"
 Sent2: We are not longer primitive, so we should allow any couple to marry, as we already allow with straight couples who do not have children.
[EX A]: Not similar

[EX Q]: Sent1: Before you state that same-sex couples cannot have children, understand that such a claim is a myth propogated by people whose religious values do not permit having sex outside a marriage or using a surrogate parent.
 Sent2: Ok so if you dont have to have the ability to have children to get married then why are you using that as an argument against same sex marriage?
[EX A]:
Similar

