Given the task definition, example input & output, solve the new input case.
The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the uv-part strategy, otherwise output No. uv-part is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used to undermine the requirements of the opponent. For instance, suggesting that the opponent would not need more firewood since they already have the basic supplies or a suggestion that there might be a store near the campsite where the opponent can get the supplies instead.
Example: Context: 'Well maybe we can work something out between us.  Our food and water was in the bags they loss so I really need those.  Do you think you could make do with 1 food and some water?' 'I really need 2 foods. I can do with 1 water or if you are in a giving mood then maybe I can have 2 waters?' 'Looks like we both really need the food.  If you get 2 food I would need 1 food, 2 water and 3 firewood. '
Utterance: 'Since you will get all the fire would do you think I could have 2 foods and 2 waters. You would get 1 food, 1 water, and 3 firewood. You seem like you are a great outdoor person that I would think you would be able to catch some fish to cook with the firewood.'
Output: Yes
Correct. The participant tries to undermine their opponent's needs by mentioning that the opponent can just fish for food.

New input case for you: Context: 'you need water and i need food so unless we do 1 food  to 1water is tht okay' 'I'll tell you what I'm willing to do.. I can't really budge on the water.. BUT.. I could do something where I take 2 water, and only one firewood, but two food.. does that work for you?' 'so if i were to  give you water what would i get ?'
Utterance: 'You'd be getting 1 water, 2 firewood, and 1 food'
Output:
No