The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the no-need strategy, otherwise output No. no-need is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used when a participant points out that they do not need an item based on personal context such as suggesting that they have ample water to spare. no-need can directly benefit the opponent since it implies that the item is up for grabs.

Let me give you an example: Context: 
Utterance: 'how about I give you 2 waters and 1 food package in exchange for all your firewood?'
The answer to this example can be: No
Here is why: The utterance does not use the no-need strategy since it never refers to an item that the participant does not need.

OK. solve this:
Context: 'Hello, I want to keep 3 packages of the water and 2 packages of the food and 1 package of the fire wood , and you can keep 1 package of the food and 2 packages of the firewood.'
Utterance: 'Could I get 1 package of the water just to be entirely safe?? I really appreciate the 2 packages of firewood as it has been very wet and rainy where I will be going.  There will be a lot of standing water, so my chances for having safe water to drink might be a little iffy.'
Answer:
No