Read the given text and if it has abusive content then indicate via "yes". Otherwise indicate via"no". 
We consider the content to be abusive if it contains any of the following instances: (1) Identity Directed Abuse (e.g., Content which contains a negative statement made against an identity. An identity is a social category that relates to a fundamental aspect of individuals community, socio-demographics, position or self-representation) (2) Affiliation Directed Abuse (e.g., Content which express negativity against an affiliation. We define affiliation as a (more or less) voluntary association with a collective. Affiliations include but are not limited to: memberships (e.g. Trade unions), party memberships (e.g. Republicans), political affiliations (e.g. Right-wing people) and occupations (e.g. Doctors).) (3) Person Directed Abuse (e.g., Content which directs negativity against an identifiable person, who is either part of the conversation thread or is named. Person-directed abuse includes serious character based attacks, such as accusing the person of lying, as well as aggression, insults and menacing language.) and (4) Counter Speech (e.g., Content which challenges, condemns or calls out the abusive language of others.). Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].

The sticky
no

>Then why are the right against any form of state healthcare?    Because it is immoral to violently force somebody else to pay for your own healthcare, you greedy parasite.    >I mean since in your own words it's the left that doesn't want mitigate poverty. How can the group against state healthcare possibly argue their opposition doesn't want to mitigate poverty?     Because letting the state run healthcare doesn't mitigate poverty, letting the free market run its course does.    >Again you failed to use complete logic    And you failed to even understand my comment. My point wasn't that the left didn't want to fight poverty, my point was that poverty, real poverty, in the West is almost non-existent thanks to capitalism. Leftists know this and that is why they focus on wealth and income inequality, because the poverty pitch no longer works.      >just like you did when you failed to see how a million square foot warehouse in a rural area can be detrimental to property value.    What?
yes

I will tweet about trans suicides and how they prove that it is a mental disorder.

yes

