Teacher:The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the no-need strategy, otherwise output No. no-need is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used when a participant points out that they do not need an item based on personal context such as suggesting that they have ample water to spare. no-need can directly benefit the opponent since it implies that the item is up for grabs.
Teacher: Now, understand the problem? Solve this instance: Context: 'Oh well that is something to consider. I love dogs. 🙂. I'd be willing to take less in that case, and let you have 2 of the waters. Would you be OK with leaving me with 1? I'd be willing to split the food up the same way (you get 2, I get 1).' 'That works. I know water is important. I promise I won't be using it to water plants or wash clothes!' '🙂 haha of course! I think we've come to a good agreement then! You get the 2 Waters, and I get Water. You get 2 Foods, and I get 1 Food. And I get the 3 Firewoods. Correct?'
Utterance: 'That is perfect for me and my dog!  Yes!'
Student:
No