We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.
--------
Question: Second, if the situation were turned, you would probably say "Purposely indulging in an act that carries risk to your own body for your own convenience and then committing suicide" if we were talking about peds.

Answer: Invalid


Question: It wouldn't shock me if someone committed murder JUST to get those things.

Answer: Valid


Question: You have conceded that a difference in neurophysiologic fitness makes sense, but we should decide on a case by case basis.

Answer:
Invalid


