Read the given text and if it has abusive content then indicate via "yes". Otherwise indicate via"no". 
We consider the content to be abusive if it contains any of the following instances: (1) Identity Directed Abuse (e.g., Content which contains a negative statement made against an identity. An identity is a social category that relates to a fundamental aspect of individuals community, socio-demographics, position or self-representation) (2) Affiliation Directed Abuse (e.g., Content which express negativity against an affiliation. We define affiliation as a (more or less) voluntary association with a collective. Affiliations include but are not limited to: memberships (e.g. Trade unions), party memberships (e.g. Republicans), political affiliations (e.g. Right-wing people) and occupations (e.g. Doctors).) (3) Person Directed Abuse (e.g., Content which directs negativity against an identifiable person, who is either part of the conversation thread or is named. Person-directed abuse includes serious character based attacks, such as accusing the person of lying, as well as aggression, insults and menacing language.) and (4) Counter Speech (e.g., Content which challenges, condemns or calls out the abusive language of others.). Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].

> Was I kind to him? Well, no.    I'm just wondering what magical words you found to get this type of reaction.  I've gotten more bans than I could even count and have replied with all sorts of insane shit to the modmail.  I think I told one to hurry back to his circlejerk before he missed his cumshower...told another to suck the diarrhea out of my ass with a straw...just whatever craziness happened to pop into my head at the moment that was a bit more creative than telling them to shove their sub up their ass.  But never got suspended.    I guess it depends on what mod it is.
no

Yes, a husband should be able to provide his wife with some action despite minuscule barriers such as.... age.
yes

What's the link I wanna see the cute sister

no

