You are given first 5 messages from a series of message exchanges between 2 persons playing the game of Diplomacy which is an American strategic board game. You need to generate the next message. The message should be generated such that it fits the context seen so far. Avoid the text that is (i) tangent to the context, (ii) repeats the context.

Q: ['Hello Russia. Have you worked out what you’re doing with turkey and Austria yet? I’m thinking of going anti Germany but want to see how we align in the north first.', 'I sent Turkey a message but still waiting on a reply. I wanted to go anti-Germany too if you want to split the population centers? But if I don’t hear back from Turkey I may have to fortify my South flank and enter the Balkan’s even though I don’t want to.', 'I moving to pressureGermany but I could use assistance on your end. Willing to share any gains that could result.', 'Yikes. You have some Turkish trouble. I’ll plan on moving into helgoland bight', 'Yea, that’s always annoying playing as Russia. Trying to get AH to help out but I have to move one of my troops back West away from pressuring Germany. Oh well.']

A: That’s a shame. Let’s reassess after you handle your problems in the east.
****
Q: ["Hi Germany! I'd love for us to start out on the right foot...let me know if you'd like to discuss the three B's (Burgundy, Belgium, and Britain) or anything else, for that matter 🙂", 'Yes, I’d be more than happy to discuss this', 'I haven’t spoken with England yet but I’m in favor of an equal split of Belgium and Holland between us. I’d like to open against Russia so if we can agree to dmz burgundy that will also free you up to focus on either England or Italy. What do you think?', 'When you say “split of bel and hol between us”, does “us” mean you and me? If so, then you’re suggesting exactly what I was going to suggest! That also goes for the bur dmz.\nI’ve also not heard anything from Britain yet but I’ll let you know if I do', 'It’s nice that we’re on the same wavelength']

A: I think so too
****
Q: ['Greeting oh Sultan of Turkey!  Any thoughts on the way you’d like to play this game?  I tend to love A/T alliances, with Austria building lots of armies and Turkey going mostly fleets (because breaking through to the Ionian Sea can be pretty hard otherwise).  We could go after Russia first, and once they’re weakened, turn some force on Italy as well.  Lots of loot to split up and keep us both happy for quite some time... what do you think?', 'I think that idea would work very well. You will most likely need to get a truce with Italy for the first few phases to protect your back until I can get ships in the area.', 'Sounds good - *if* I Italy is not lying to me, I could get that truce.  What do you think we should do with Russia then? Try and trick him into leaving either Galacia or the Black Sea empty (I don’t imagine we’d be so lucky as to have him do both, but you never know, some people are just trusting like that 🙂 ).  If you control BLA, we make pretty short work of the southern Russian position: Rum and Sev fall in a year or two.  But if he’s cagey and careful, it’ll go slower.', 'That sounds good to me. I will talk with Russia about having a dmz in bla so I can move in.', 'So did Russia agree to leave BLA empty as a DMZ, and then go in anyway, or was that an arranged bounce like him and I in Gal?']

A:
No, the bounce wasn't planned. Could you support bul to rum, or are you supporting alb to gre?
****
