The critic consesnsus is: Even more absurd and implausible than the first XXX movie, State of the Union is less inspired and technically competent than its predecessor.. What reviews supported this critic consensus?
1. Like an actual State of the Union address, there is nothing in State of the Union you haven't encountered already.
2. ...going for the hip hop-loving teen market (both city and suburbs) that is more than willing to drop big money on flashy hubcaps, flavor-of-the-month CDs and crappy movies.
3. There isn't a fresh moment in the entire 100-minute running time. The tediousness is impossible to dispel.
4. The plot swings between pathetically implausible and aggressively stupid.
5. If this sequel is any indication, the next XXX will be subtitled 'Bigger, Louder, Dumber.'
6. The stunts and explosions are effective, but the dialogue and characters are not.
7. This flashy atrocity, clearly a lost cause from the first five minutes, offers viewers no option but to assume crash position and brace themselves for the worst.
8. The only thing that really matters is whether the action scenes push the envelope -- and they don't, especially compared with the extreme sports style of the first XXX.
9. Like the original, it's ultra loud and often looks like a PlayStation game. But when the fast and furious bludgeoning and blow-ups wane, the screen may as well be tuned to channel zero.
10. This new XXX has a story that may break all recent records for rampaging cliches and utter nonsense.