Given the task definition, example input & output, solve the new input case.
In this task, you will be shown a sentence, and you should determine whether it is overruling or non-overruling. In law, an overruling sentence is a statement that nullifies a previous case decision as a precedent by a constitutionally valid statute or a decision by the same or higher ranking court which establishes a different rule on the point of law involved. Classify your answers into overruling or non-overruling
Example: 876 f.3d at 1306.
Output: non-overruling
It's a good example. This sentence doesn't overrule any law, So it's non-overruling.

New input case for you: the dissent contends that "the majority has chosen to recede from johnson without conducting a stare decisis analysis and without acknowledging that it is receding from our precedent.
Output:
overruling