Given the task definition, example input & output, solve the new input case.
In this task, you will be shown a sentence, and you should determine whether it is overruling or non-overruling. In law, an overruling sentence is a statement that nullifies a previous case decision as a precedent by a constitutionally valid statute or a decision by the same or higher ranking court which establishes a different rule on the point of law involved. Classify your answers into overruling or non-overruling
Example: 876 f.3d at 1306.
Output: non-overruling
It's a good example. This sentence doesn't overrule any law, So it's non-overruling.

New input case for you: before the court takes the radical step to overrule cervantes  and effectively to impugn the rationale of morales too, albeit sub silentio  it would do well to explain why the requirement of article 26.13(a)(4) is not of sufficient import to defeat the state's otherwise compelling interest in the finality of convictions.
Output:
overruling