TASK DEFINITION: Read the given text and if it has abusive content then indicate via "yes". Otherwise indicate via"no". 
We consider the content to be abusive if it contains any of the following instances: (1) Identity Directed Abuse (e.g., Content which contains a negative statement made against an identity. An identity is a social category that relates to a fundamental aspect of individuals community, socio-demographics, position or self-representation) (2) Affiliation Directed Abuse (e.g., Content which express negativity against an affiliation. We define affiliation as a (more or less) voluntary association with a collective. Affiliations include but are not limited to: memberships (e.g. Trade unions), party memberships (e.g. Republicans), political affiliations (e.g. Right-wing people) and occupations (e.g. Doctors).) (3) Person Directed Abuse (e.g., Content which directs negativity against an identifiable person, who is either part of the conversation thread or is named. Person-directed abuse includes serious character based attacks, such as accusing the person of lying, as well as aggression, insults and menacing language.) and (4) Counter Speech (e.g., Content which challenges, condemns or calls out the abusive language of others.). Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].
PROBLEM: > Furthermore, a lot of players do some form of mana weaving to stack their decks.     this is cheating and/or stalling (a distinct penalty) and judges should be way harsher on it.

SOLUTION: no

PROBLEM: And? Why do y'all be caring about Libya but Mauritania has been having it widespread since the 1600s? Maybe cuz not all Libyan slaves be black?  I just be saying...       Edit: actually ion care about neither one of em. The milkshakes more interesting than that.

SOLUTION: yes

PROBLEM: As a Pokemon fan, this angers me.    WTF are they even going on about?

SOLUTION:
no

