We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

[EX Q]: Sent1: A little faith in the system, after all, it is good enough to sentence someone to LWOP.
 Sent2: If the system is good enough to send someone to prison for life, it should be good enough to send them to death row.
[EX A]: Not similar

[EX Q]: Sent1: The lives saved by the death penalty, which I suspect is 0, unless the answer to the above question is "yes", is smaller than the innocents killed by the death penalty.
 Sent2: All of the death penalty oppontents are for life in jail as opposed to the death penalty.I am sure that if some are found innocent,there are at least that many that are innocent and never set free.
[EX A]: Not similar

[EX Q]: Sent1: I know the eye for an eye statement is wrong.
 Sent2: So far, I am hearing "an eye for an eye" which is just that vengeance centered sense of justice that I am arguing against.
[EX A]:
Similar

