The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the uv-part strategy, otherwise output No. uv-part is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used to undermine the requirements of the opponent. For instance, suggesting that the opponent would not need more firewood since they already have the basic supplies or a suggestion that there might be a store near the campsite where the opponent can get the supplies instead.

Context: 'No, I don't take this. Because food is important for my child and me.' 'Try to understand our situation. We had food a week back. We were drinking only water for the whole week. We are dying of hunger. Kindly understand our situation.' 'Even me too facing the same, but i am ready to share one food with you. You can offer me more water to safe myself without dying. Both will be happy'
Utterance: 'Okay I shall give you 1 package of food and 2 packages of water. Is that okay for you now?'
No

Context: 
Utterance: 'Hello How is preparing for your trip going?'
No

Context: 'oh nooo, that's terrible. do they know where they left them?' 'I think they went to Chicago.  I really needing replace our lost water and sleeping bags.  I see there are some extra supplies to share.  I could really use the water and firwood.  🙂' 'oh yeah, you definitely do. we have all of our stuff and mostly wanted to hike and have picnics during our camping trip '
Utterance: 'Great. If you mainly doing picnics do you want 3 Food?   I could use the the supplies.  🙂'

Yes

