Teacher: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the self-need strategy, otherwise output No. self-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used to create a personal need for an item in the negotiation, such as by pointing out that the participant sweats a lot to show preference towards water packages.
Teacher: Now, understand the problem? If you are still confused, see the following example:
Context: 'That sounds pretty reasonable as I am in need of firewood the most. Would it be most reasonable to each take what we need most and split the water down the middle?' 'Yes, it would.' 'I think that sounds fair. The problem is that there are 3 waters and one of us would get two and the other one. How should we sort that?'
Utterance: 'You can take the two water. I am not that thirsty most days.'
Solution: No
Reason: In this utterance, the participant does not use self-need since they do not talk about any need for themselves.

Now, solve this instance: Context: 'Actually, I've just thought about it and I'd also like one package of water. I think it'd be fair being that you're getting 2 packages of food.' 'Which means? Did you mean that I would take 2 packages of food and 2 packages of water? Then I will ask for one package of fire wood.' 'Being that you're getting 2 of 3 of the item (food) that for me is the highest value, I think it's only fair that I get all 3 of the medium value items (firewood) and one of the low value item (water). That would give me 5 packages and you 4 packages, but 2 of 4 of your packages are the high value items.'
Utterance: 'Okay then. I agree with you.. Shall we finalize our deal. I will take the 2 packages of food and 2 packages of water.r.🙂'
Student:
No