Given the task definition and input, reply with output. Read the given text and if it has abusive content then indicate via "yes". Otherwise indicate via"no". 
We consider the content to be abusive if it contains any of the following instances: (1) Identity Directed Abuse (e.g., Content which contains a negative statement made against an identity. An identity is a social category that relates to a fundamental aspect of individuals community, socio-demographics, position or self-representation) (2) Affiliation Directed Abuse (e.g., Content which express negativity against an affiliation. We define affiliation as a (more or less) voluntary association with a collective. Affiliations include but are not limited to: memberships (e.g. Trade unions), party memberships (e.g. Republicans), political affiliations (e.g. Right-wing people) and occupations (e.g. Doctors).) (3) Person Directed Abuse (e.g., Content which directs negativity against an identifiable person, who is either part of the conversation thread or is named. Person-directed abuse includes serious character based attacks, such as accusing the person of lying, as well as aggression, insults and menacing language.) and (4) Counter Speech (e.g., Content which challenges, condemns or calls out the abusive language of others.). Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].

Any citations for this the explanation of Mitsuhide's betrayal? As far as I knew, no one knows the reason and whether it was the treaty, Oda simply calling him names, or fear he was being supplanted as an important general (or other factors).    The massacre at Mt. Hiei was brutal, but Nobunaga was trying to break the militancy of the Buddhist monks  (Sansom has a good thorough line about this in his three volume history). Buddhist monks through much of Japanese history were a large, well-armed faction that caused problems for both the court in Kyoto and for daimyo. Without crushing them to the roots, its likely they would have continued causing problems for those groups.

no