The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the uv-part strategy, otherwise output No. uv-part is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used to undermine the requirements of the opponent. For instance, suggesting that the opponent would not need more firewood since they already have the basic supplies or a suggestion that there might be a store near the campsite where the opponent can get the supplies instead.

[Q]: Context: 
Utterance: 'Hello! '
[A]: No


[Q]: Context: 'I would like 2' 'I will  be happy to let you have 3 packs of food , but I need 2 packs of firewood' 'I am also letting you have all 3 packs of water. I think we need to consider how to split the firewood in a fair manner.'
Utterance: 'What do you think is  a fair deal with the firewood'
[A]: No


[Q]: Context: 'I get tired to easy so I probably won't be much fun at a bonfire ☹️. I really do appreciate the offer though. I would think the extra food would do you more good for your party. ' 'The extra food would be appreciated.  How about if I take just two each of the firewood and food, and you can have the remainder, plus all of the water?' 'I am just concerned that only 1 firewood might make it so I'm too cold to function. '
Utterance: 'If you boil the water above the fire, it will provide additional heat over time.  You would also be able to make tea, which would warm you up from the inside as well, better than any fire would.  That would probably be most beneficial to you.  I really do need the 2 firewood if there's any chance of making a bonfire for my party.'
[A]:
Yes


