Read the given text and if it has abusive content then indicate via "yes". Otherwise indicate via"no". 
We consider the content to be abusive if it contains any of the following instances: (1) Identity Directed Abuse (e.g., Content which contains a negative statement made against an identity. An identity is a social category that relates to a fundamental aspect of individuals community, socio-demographics, position or self-representation) (2) Affiliation Directed Abuse (e.g., Content which express negativity against an affiliation. We define affiliation as a (more or less) voluntary association with a collective. Affiliations include but are not limited to: memberships (e.g. Trade unions), party memberships (e.g. Republicans), political affiliations (e.g. Right-wing people) and occupations (e.g. Doctors).) (3) Person Directed Abuse (e.g., Content which directs negativity against an identifiable person, who is either part of the conversation thread or is named. Person-directed abuse includes serious character based attacks, such as accusing the person of lying, as well as aggression, insults and menacing language.) and (4) Counter Speech (e.g., Content which challenges, condemns or calls out the abusive language of others.). Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].

[EX Q]: You a GallowBoob shill or something? Get outta here!    If I'm honest he doesn't really affect my experience that much, but I think it must be disappointing for the people who've seen reddit grow, especially when his activities contravene the ideals of reddit expressed in the sidebar. That would be heart-breaking, which I suppose is why I'm calling it out.
[EX A]: yes

[EX Q]: >Exactly. The time for remaining silent and out of the public eye is over. Investigation is done, and we still have no questions answered.    They are answered. You just don't like the answers.
[EX A]: no

[EX Q]: GTFO repost normie
[EX A]:
yes

