We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.
One example: If gun bans worked there would be no gun deaths in the countries that have banned guns.
Solution is here: Valid
Explanation: It is an argument that claims that gun bans will not work.

Now, solve this: As to all of the other demands for more and more and more and more and more, gun control, then a never ending list loopholes on all that is proposed, see the last 300 iterations of this exact same thread.
Solution:
Valid