Critic consensus:Looking for Richard a smart, fascinating behind-the-scenes look at adapting Shakespeare.

Numbered reviews:1. It is a noble goal Pacino has set for himself, but there is something inherently contradictory about the way he has chosen to go about achieving it.
2. The film is an effective ride, pulling you into the thrill of the production,inviting you to roll with the language, and demonstrating again Shakespeare's enduring kick.
3. While there's no harm in attempting to make Shakespeare more accessible, it's hard to imagine this film exciting anyone except Pacino's fans and those who are fatally charmed by celebrity actors.
4. Pacino makes looking for Richard a great adventure and outrageous fun.
5. At times, the film seems like a documentary, and other times it is more staged, but it is playful and entertaining most of the time, and always instructive.
6. An astute, funny, loving and occasionally even beautiful documentary about actors preparing to do a play.
7. Not an easy task, but worth the effort.
8. The last half-hour drags.
9. Do you love Shakespeare? Are you fascinated by the actor's craft? Mad about classical theater? Have I got a movie for you.
10. A thrill, for the Shakespearean novice and expert alike.


Critic consensus:Breathless rewrote the rules of cinema -- and more than 50 years after its arrival, Jean-Luc Godard's paradigm-shifting classic remains every bit as vital.

Numbered reviews:1. Modern movies begin here, with Jean-Luc Godard's Breathless in 1960. No debut film since Citizen Kane in 1942 has been as influential.
2. Godard's attention to nuance and detail makes this influential classic a must-see for any film lover.
3. Decades later, this seminal work of the French New Wave is still one of Godard's freshest, most innovative, and most accessible films with a stunning performance by Jean Paul Belmondo channeling Bogart.
4. Even if some of Breathless remains inaccessibly arty and obtuse, it's nonetheless a film of watershed importance.
5. Who doesn't like Breathless? It's some kind of free-wheeling comic experiment in cool, and it works the whole way.
6. A stunning classic.
7. This film, a first pic by a film critic, shows the immediate influence of Yank actioners and socio-psycho thrillers but has its own personal style.
8. Shot on a shoestring and none the worse for it, Jean-Luc Godard's gritty and engaging first feature had an almost revolutionary impact when first released in 1960.
9. Beautiful.
10. Regardless of how one feels about Jean-Luc Godard's later, less accessible works, it would be hard to find a more audacious debut feature.


Critic consensus:Powerfully acted and lovely to look at, Kumiko, the Treasure Hunter offers a treat for cinephiles with a taste for the pleasantly peculiar.

Numbered reviews:
1. As portraits of mental illness go, "Kumiko" is slender but even-handed, neither romanticizing its heroine's mania nor tipping into melodrama or horror.
2. "Kumiko, the Treasure Hunter" is a supple combination of Little Red Riding Hood adventure, ironic road film and cross-cultural confusion.
3. The simplicity of the setup works, so perhaps all of this layering -- of truth and legend and flights of fancy -- is an unnecessary burden here.
4. Kumiko, the Treasure Hunter, a cool and ambitious slice of weird from Austin's own Zellner brothers, works best as pure fairy tale, a quest to find a fortune that the audiences knows doesn't actually exist.
5. Surprising, mystical film about lonely woman on a mission.
6. An intriguing indie and certainly one-of-a-kind. The Coen Bros. likely would approve.
7. Fans of obscure cinema will fall in love with this beautiful, cryptic, and outstanding treasure hunting pilgrimage. The more you think about Kumiko, the Treasure Hunter the more treasure you find buried within the film.
8. It's a strange movie, and perhaps not all that easy to love, but if the filmmakers had gone straight for "lovable," then they might have ruined the unique spell they have cast.
9. ...a beautiful, chilly odyssey.
10. A truly mystifying human puzzle.