Given the task definition and input, reply with output. Read the given text and if it has abusive content then indicate via "yes". Otherwise indicate via"no". 
We consider the content to be abusive if it contains any of the following instances: (1) Identity Directed Abuse (e.g., Content which contains a negative statement made against an identity. An identity is a social category that relates to a fundamental aspect of individuals community, socio-demographics, position or self-representation) (2) Affiliation Directed Abuse (e.g., Content which express negativity against an affiliation. We define affiliation as a (more or less) voluntary association with a collective. Affiliations include but are not limited to: memberships (e.g. Trade unions), party memberships (e.g. Republicans), political affiliations (e.g. Right-wing people) and occupations (e.g. Doctors).) (3) Person Directed Abuse (e.g., Content which directs negativity against an identifiable person, who is either part of the conversation thread or is named. Person-directed abuse includes serious character based attacks, such as accusing the person of lying, as well as aggression, insults and menacing language.) and (4) Counter Speech (e.g., Content which challenges, condemns or calls out the abusive language of others.). Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].

The incident reads almost like satire of the Confucian social hierarchy where wives and children are worth nothing than meat when compared to men of higher social status. 3 kingdoms isn't satire though and is completely serious with its promotion of Confucian patriarchal oppression in scenes like that one which gives me the creeps as well.       There's this saying 老不读三国 which means that old people shouldn't read 3 kingdoms because it teaches grown men to betray, cheat and steal. I don't know how old the saying is but for at least a few decades to centuries its commonly understood in Chinese culture that its Confucian veneer is not right and its characters are not to be emulated. I still love the story but I still have reconcile it with the fact that its morality is at best hypocritical and at worst a textbook in evil.

no