instruction:
The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the elicit-pref strategy, otherwise output No. elicit-pref is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used to discover the preference order of the opponent in the negotiation.
question:
Context: 'I could manage with one firewood and two foods, but if you have canteens for everyone, may I then have all three waters? I had planned to collect water from the river, but I'm worried I may get sick.' 'you pointed out that we will need more!  😮 i will take 2 waters' 'I didn't know you had supplied everyone with water before the trip. I was merely trying to look out for your needs, but you said you didn't need them!'
Utterance: 'I am giving you a lot of food. You are being unreasonable and backtracking. You are getting some of everything with my offers, and there are only two of you.'
answer:
No


question:
Context: 'Yes, thats all. I need 1/3 food, 2/3 water, and 2/3 firewood.' 'Still not convinced in any way that you need more items in total over me. Please clarify!' 'Food is what I prioritize much more than the others. If you want the majority of the others, I will need all the food.'
Utterance: 'Ok, I'm willing to compromise to speed this up - I'll go with the original plan you've outlined, and I'll take 2/3 food, 1/3 water, and 1/3 firewood'
answer:
No


question:
Context: 'I don't have a problem with you having extra water.  I'll give you all the water, if I can have all of the firewood.' 'I think that's more than fair. That only brings up the food to be divided. One of us is going to have to take less.' 'I'd be fine with taking less food.  So, I would get 3 firewood, 1 food, and 0 water.  Is that correct?'
Utterance: 'And I would get 0 firewood, 2 food and 3 water. That seems right to me.'
answer:

No


