TASK DEFINITION: In this task, you are given a passage which has a question and the context. You have to generate an answer to the question based on the information present in the context.
PROBLEM: Context: In developmental research, infants are commonly assumed to be early stakeholders in interactions with their caregivers. The tools that infants can use to interact with others vary from visual contact to smiling or vocalizing, and also include motor activity. However, surprisingly few studies have explored how the nature and context of social interactions affect infants' engagement in motor activity.", "We investigated the kinematic properties of foot and face movements produced by 11 infants aged between 5 and 9 months during six contrasting dyadic episodes (i.e. passive presence of a stranger or the infant's mother, weak or intense interaction with the stranger/mother as she sings a nursery play song).", "The infants' face and foot motor activity was significantly reduced during the interactive episodes, compared with the episodes without any interaction, in both the mother and stranger conditions. Furthermore, the level of their motor activity was significantly lower in the stranger condition than in the mother one for some parameters.\Question: Is social interaction associated with changes in infants ' motor activity?

SOLUTION: These results are in line with those reported by previous studies and confirm the relevance of using motor activity to delineate the early forms of interactive episodes in infants.

PROBLEM: Context: Patient-prosthesis mismatch has been identified as a risk factor for mortality after aortic valve replacement and for structural valve deterioration (SVD) in patients receiving a bioprosthetic aortic valve. The aim of the present study was to compare the incidence of aortic valve bioprosthesis replacement for SVD in patients with mismatch to a population without mismatch.', 'Three hundred eighty-seven adult patients who underwent aortic valve replacement with a bioprosthesis from 1974 to 2009 were retrospectively reviewed. Mismatch was considered to be present if the anticipated indexed effective orifice area was <0.70\u2009cm(2) /m(2) . The median follow-up period was 7.2 years. Follow-up was 97% complete.', "Patient-prosthesis mismatch was present in 12% of the study population (n\u2009=\u200947). Ten-year freedom from reoperation for aortic bioprosthesis replacement was 74.3\u2009±\u20093.2%. During follow-up, 111 patients underwent reoperation for aortic bioprosthesis replacement. Causes of aortic bioprosthesis replacement were SVD of the bioprosthesis (n\u2009=\u200996), paravalvular leak (n\u2009=\u200910), and acute endocarditis (n\u2009=\u20095). According to unadjusted Kaplan-Meier analysis, patients with mismatch had a higher incidence of aortic bioprosthesis replacement for SVD when compared with patients without mismatch (log rank test: p 0.05). This result was confirmed by multivariable Cox regression analysis, which identified two independent predictors of aortic bioprosthesis replacement for SVD: patients' age (hazard ratio (HR) 0.967) and patient-prosthesis mismatch (HR 2.161).\Question: Does patient-prosthesis mismatch in patients undergoing bioprosthetic aortic valve implantation increase risk of reoperation for structural valve deterioration?

SOLUTION: Patients suffering from mismatch were twice as likely to undergo reoperation for aortic bioprosthesis replacement for SVD than those without mismatch.

PROBLEM: Context: Our previously reported therapeutic synergy between naturally occurring seleno-amino acid methylselenocysteine (MSC) and anticancer drugs could not be shown in vitro. Studies were carried out to investigate the potential role of MSC-induced tumor vascular maturation and increased drug delivery in the observed therapeutic synergy in vivo.', 'Mice bearing s.c. FaDu human head and neck squamous cell carcinoma xenografts were treated with MSC (0.2 mg/d x 14 days orally). Changes in microvessel density (CD31), vascular maturation (CD31/alpha-smooth muscle actin), perfusion (Hoechst 33342/DiOC7), and permeability (dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging) were determined at the end of the 14-day treatment period. Additionally, the effect of MSC on drug delivery was investigated by determining intratumoral concentration of doxorubicin using high-performance liquid chromatography and fluorescence microscopy.', 'Double immunostaining of tumor sections revealed a marked reduction ( approximately 40%) in microvessel density accompanying tumor growth inhibition following MSC treatment along with a concomitant increase in the vascular maturation index ( approximately 30% > control) indicative of increased pericyte coverage of microvessels. Hoechst 33342/DiOC7 staining showed improved vessel functionality, and dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging using the intravascular contrast agent, albumin-GdDTPA, revealed a significant reduction in vascular permeability following MSC treatment. Consistent with these observations, a 4-fold increase in intratumoral doxorubicin levels was observed with MSC pretreatment compared with administration of doxorubicin alone.\Question: Does tumor vascular maturation and improved drug delivery induced by methylselenocysteine lead to therapeutic synergy with anticancer drugs?

SOLUTION:
These results show, for the first time, the antiangiogenic effects of MSC results in tumor growth inhibition, vascular maturation in vivo, and enhanced anticancer drug delivery that are associated with the observed therapeutic synergy in vivo.

