In this task, you will be presented with a context from an academic paper and a question separated with a 
. You have to answer the question based on the context.

[EX Q]: We then proceed to connect these mentions i) if they co-occur within the same document (we will refer to this as DOC-BASED edges), ii) if the pair of named entity mentions is identical (MATCH edges—these may connect nodes across and within documents), or iii) if they are in the same coreference chain, as predicted by the external coreference system (COREF edges).  
 Question: How did they get relations between mentions?
[EX A]: Assign a value to the relation based on whether mentions occur in the same document, if mentions are identical, or if mentions are in the same coreference chain.

[EX Q]: Level B categorizes the type of offense and two labels are used: targeted (TIN) and untargeted (INT) insults and threats.

Targeted Insult (TIN): Posts which contain an insult/threat to an individual, group, or others (see next layer);

Untargeted (UNT): Posts containing non-targeted profanity and swearing. Posts with general profanity are not targeted, but they contain non-acceptable language. Level C categorizes the targets of insults and threats as individual (IND), group (GRP), and other (OTH).

Individual (IND): Posts targeting an individual. It can be a a famous person, a named individual or an unnamed participant in the conversation. Insults and threats targeted at individuals are often defined as cyberbulling.

Group (GRP): The target of these offensive posts is a group of people considered as a unity due to the same ethnicity, gender or sexual orientation, political affiliation, religious belief, or other common characteristic. Many of the insults and threats targeted at a group correspond to what is commonly understood as hate speech.

Other (OTH): The target of these offensive posts does not belong to any of the previous two categories (e.g. an organization, a situation, an event, or an issue). 
 Question: What kinds of offensive content are explored?
[EX A]: non-targeted profanity and swearing, targeted insults such as cyberbullying, offensive content related to ethnicity, gender or sexual orientation, political affiliation, religious belief, and anything belonging to hate speech

[EX Q]: Particularly, it is not clear whether BERT shed light on solving tasks such as the Pronoun Disambiguation Problem (PDP) and Winograd Schema Challenge (WSC). On a Pronoun Disambiguation dataset, PDP-60, our method achieves 68.3% accuracy, which is better than the state-of-art accuracy of 66.7%. On a WSC dataset, WSC-273, our method achieves 60.3%.  
 Question: Which datasets do they evaluate on?
[EX A]:
PDP-60 WSC-273

