Generate an appropriate single-sentence summary for the given text such that it includes the main topic of the text.

The WHO says processed meats such as bacon, sausages and ham increase the risk of getting cancer. Dr Ian Johnson, from the Institute of Food Research, a publicly funded UK research institute that focuses on the science of food and health He reacted cautiously to the WHO's report, saying: "It is important to emphasise that this classification reflects the strength of the evidence for an effect, not the actual size of the risk. "Meat consumption is probably one of many factors contributing to the high rates of bowel cancer seen in America, Western Europe and Australia, but the mechanism is poorly understood, and the effect is much smaller than, for example, that of cigarette smoking on the risk of lung cancer. "It is also worth noting that there is little or no evidence that vegetarians in the UK have a lower risk of bowel cancer than meat-eaters." Maureen Strong, of the Agriculture and Horticulture Development Board, which is funded by farmers and growers to supply the food industry with information She said the WHO's report did not suggest eating red and processed meats "as part of a balanced diet" caused cancer. "No single food causes cancer. [The WHO's International Agency for Research on Cancer] itself has said that the risk from processed meat remains small," she said. Ms Strong added that the average daily consumption of processed meat was 17 grams, which meant that on average people would need to eat "three times their current levels to increase their risk" of developing cancer. Dr Louis Levy, of government health organisation Public Health England He said findings in the report were "broadly in line with current government advice", which is based on the possible link between consuming red and processed meat and colorectal cancer. "On average, we should be eating no more than 70g a day. This advice recognises the fact that red meat is also a good source of nutrients, including iron, zinc and vitamin B12." Professor Tim Key, from Cancer Research UK He said there was "substantial evidence" for a link between meat-eating and bowel cancer. However, "Eating a bacon bap every once in a while isn't going to do much harm - having a healthy diet is all about moderation," he said. "You could try having fish for your dinner rather than sausages, or choosing to have a bean salad for lunch over a BLT." Meurig Raymond, president of the National Farmers Union (NFU) Mr Raymond said: "The NFU has always stated that eating lean red meat has an important role to play in a healthy balanced diet. It's a traditional part of the British lifestyle and is enjoyed by most of the population. He added that there was a "complex relationship" between diet and good health, and the solutions to any link between diet and illness "cannot be polarised or simplistic". "The scientific and medical communities both agree that consuming recommended quantities of red meat is beneficial to human health and provides the body with a ready source of essential vitamins and minerals," he said. Clare Oxborrow, from environmental campaign group Friends of the Earth She welcomed the report, and said: "This should be a wake-up call that our diets urgently need to change. "Evidence shows that high meat diets not only harm our health; they damage our environment too. Experts have warned that unless we eat less meat globally, we will fail to meet our climate change targets." Chris Godfrey, from Godfrey's Butchers in Highbury, north London, which has been selling sausages for more than 100 years Mr Godfrey said he was not concerned by the WHO's report as it is not telling people to avoid eating meat altogether. "They're not saying that meat's bad for you. What they're saying is that a healthy diet is good for you, which we already knew." "Most people read these things, they're quite intelligent enough to be able to realise that it's not as bad as smoking a cigarette."
UK scientists and meat industry representatives have been debating what the World Health Organization report linking meat and meat products to cancer will mean.

Which? said the findings - based on a survey and diaries kept by the elderly - showed a system in need of reform. The investigation found cases of missed visits, food left out of reach, medication not given and people left in soiled beds. BBC News website readers have shared their experiences of the home care system. John, Suffolk I am full time sole carer for my wife who has advanced MS. When we had to call in carers it was useless. She received home care when I was admitted to hospital. The carers made twice daily visits for 20 minutes. She was left sitting and sleeping on a sofa for three days and nights because they refused to transfer her to her wheelchair. This meant no washing, no toileting and if it hadn't been for neighbours no food. On the third day a male carer arrived who was ex-merchant navy and he finally lifted her off the sofa and helped her dress. When I was there with the carers they told me to sit and relax. But then constantly came asking me to lift my wife because they refused to lift her. They were useless so I finally told them to leave. I have had to cancel carers on other occasions because they barely could speak English and didn't seem to have a clue as how to do their job. These events occurred BEFORE the so-called economic crisis and have been endemic in the system for many years. Needless to say I'm not impressed. We haven't complained about any of the carers we've had as we believe it will only lead to us receiving worse treatment by the staff in the future. We know of people who have complained and have received worse care in response. I'm an ex-nurse and I currently do voluntary work at the local hospice. The volunteers' care and compassion in the hospice puts the home care provision to shame. If it can be done properly in a volunteer hospice it can be done properly in home care. Alan Mackinnon, Hull I am 72-years-old and have serious chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). I need care to clean my home, shop and also to bathe. The quality of care from registered agencies has left much to be desired and I have been forced to arrange my own care and fund it myself as a result. I have had quite a bit of contact with care companies and carers and it is my opinion that care companies offer very little training and do not supervise their staff. They pay as little as they can get away with and work their staff like slaves - it's unsurprising that this leads to abuses, if only due to the workers' frustration with their working conditions. I have also heard from various carers that they don't get paid for travelling time so they are always having to rush off. The people running the companies just want to make as much money as possible. Now I pay a friend privately to help me clean the flat and I pay a local chap to bring me one meal per day. I'm worried about the future as I get older and more disabled. The system needs a shake-up now. Fiona Pimm, Bristol I have worked in home care for 14 years and I can assure you that not all home care companies are like this. I now work for a small home care company and we do our utmost to make sure the times allocated to those who need care is spent with them. We do not have carers travelling from one side of town to the other - where possible we are kept in one area so we have as much time as possible with the client. Carers are spot checked on a regular basis and we have a close working relationship with family members. We have a very experienced and fully trained team of staff who are very caring and put 100% into their job role. I believe these problems that you and others are highlighting are a result of big companies taking on care packages whether or not they have the capacity to deal with them, but they do it anyway because they are only interested in making money. As a result visits are over lapped, carers are forced to travel from one side of town to the other, there are unreliable staff who constantly go off sick due to being overworked, and it's the client who suffers as a result. There are companies out there who you can really trust but finding them is a problem. There should be a proper recommendation programme in place to help people do this. Jan McCarthy, Sunderland I am a full-time carer for my mum, who has lived with me for two years. We also have a carer who comes in three times a week. She is lovely, we have no problems with her. But these carers have to rush from job to job and are given no travelling time. Our carer could be scheduled for an 08:15 visit to us for 45 minutes and then given a job at 9 at another person's house. This person may live a 15-minute walk away. The carer has to decide whether she should leave our visit or turn up late for the next person. The majority of carers seem to be paid the minimum wage and it is seen as an unskilled job, similar to being a cleaner. There is no real financial encouragement for family members to care for elderly relatives either. As a parent you are given child tax credit, but someone like myself, who has given up full-time employment to look after my parent, is given £55 a week to do so. If my mother was in care it would cost the government at least £450 per week. Cutting out these private companies and taking care back to the councils would halve the care bill in one fell swoop. Instead of allowing companies to profit from elderly care, allow better restriction and checking of quality of care given.
The consumer group Which? has described the standards of care provided for older people in their homes in the UK as "shocking and disgraceful".

Kingsbury Green Academy in Calne has closed its sixth form and Avon Valley College in Durrington has sent 65 year 10 students home. Twelve pupils in Year 6 and 8 at Springfield Academy, also in Calne, are self-isolating until 28 September. At Bulford St Leonard's Primary, 35 Year 5 pupils and three staff will remain at home until 26 September. Kingsbury's 110 pupils and three staff members will self-isolate until 30 September. Kingsbury and Bulford have both arranged for pupils to continue learning at home while self-isolating. On Tuesday, 284 Year 9 students at Royal Wootton Bassett Academy were told to self-isolate and take classes remotely for 14 days. One student tested positive at Avon Valley which means students will self-isolate until 21 September. The college is run by Salisbury Plain Academies Trust, which also runs Bulford St Leonards. Pupils at St Augustine's College in Trowbridge, Brook Field Primary and Lainesmead Primary in Swindon, St Margaret's Prep School in Calne, and Trinity Primary in Devizes have also been sent home. Head teacher at Kingsbury Green Academy, Jason Tudor, said: "We have written to all parents and carers to explain the situation, and we really appreciate their understanding and support as we know this will cause some unfortunate disruption for the Year 12 and 13 pupils and their families. "The safety of everyone within our school community is our top priority and we'll continue to work with Wiltshire Council and Public Health England to ensure this is managed closely and that the rest of the school can continue as before." Wiltshire director of public health Kate Blackburn said: "These are very precautionary measures so that the risk of any transmission within the school communities is kept as low as possible."

Three schools and a college in Wiltshire have sent students home after positive tests for coronavirus.

