Given a document, generate a short title of the document. The title should convey the main idea/event/topic about which the document is being written. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].

Ex Input:
On October 22   Tesla  announced a landmark agreement to manufacture cars in China  building capacity to produce locally and boost sales in the worldâs largest market for electric vehicles.
The agreement is a landmark deal in several respects. China has granted  Tesla  more autonomy than other foreign producers.  Tesla  is the first major foreign automaker to establish local operations without a 50:50 local joint venture partner. This is a key concession as  it  allows  Tesla  tighter control over both  its  intellectual property and vertically-integrated production process.  Tesla  will also benefit by reducing production costs for cars sold in China and  though details were not disclosed  may also receive tax breaks and subsidies akin to those enjoyed by Chinese producers.
 Attracting Tesla  is a symbolic win for China. China has clear ambitions to lead the world in electric vehicles in a broader effort to build a cleaner  environmentally-conscious society. The timing of this announcement during Chinaâs critical 19th Congress reinforces the governmentâs broader objectives.
Yet  a closer look suggests that  Tesla  needs China more than China needs  Tesla . As the chart from IHS Markit: Light Vehicle Forecast below shows  China is an essential market for leading global automakers. China surpassed the United States in 2009 as the largest car market  and car sales in Western markets are forecast to decline  while emerging markets will drive global growth.
With its recent shift in environmental priorities  China is also becoming a major player in electric vehicles. In 2016  China accounted for 45% of all the newly registered electric vehicles worldwide with 336 000 in China vs. 160 000 in the United States. China is also building an EV charging infrastructure that primes the market for a high-end producer such as  Tesla . In 2016  China had a 44% global share of publicly available EV charging outlets  including 82% of fast-charging outlets. Demand for electric vehicles has grown faster in China than in any other global market with the share of EV purchases increasing 3.6x from 2014 to 2016. With EV purchases accounting for just 1.37% of the total car market  the Chinese EV market seems poised for further growth.
Low end EV's dominate Tesla
Despite seemingly favorable market conditions   Tesla  has had little success in China to date. Subsidies have driven electric vehicle demand  with the Chinese government paying up to 50% of the purchase price of domestically-produced EV cars. Lower-end electric vehicles have dominated  and  Tesla   which is subject to 25% import taxes  has largely been priced out of the market. In 2016   Tesla  had just a 3% share of the electric vehicle market in China.
 Tesla âs lackluster performance in China is a striking contrast to other global automakers. As in the West  cars are a status symbol in China  and consumers prefer prestigious global brands. Foreign cars claim a 60% market share in China  with foreign brands claiming seven of the top eight spots for cars sold in 2016. Premium brands have done particularly well in China.
Audi  BMW  Mercedes and Porsche all sell between a quarter to a third of their total global sales in China -- a 10% increase on average in just the past five years. In addition  Volkswagen now sells half of its global volume in China. The experiences of other foreign car brands suggest that  Tesla  should fare well in China if  it  can reduce production costs and vehicle pricing in line with the local market.
It is within this context that  Tesla  needs China more than China needs  Tesla . Chinaâs electric vehicle market will grow with or without  Tesla . But Teslaâs deal with the Shanghai government is both timely and essential. As the electric vehicle market takes off in China   Tesla  must do well in this vital market to maintain global leadership. Building volume in China is required to reduce production costs and pricing in the global as well as local market. Ultimately  as we are seeing in other industries   Tesla  may find that technology talent in China will also prove vital to maintain  its  position as a leading innovator globally.

Ex Output:
Why Tesla Needs China More Than China Needs Tesla


Ex Input:
After a slight scare when Federal Communications Commission (FCC)  Chair Ajit Pai  received a note to evacuate in the middle of  his  closing argument in favor of overturning net neutrality rules implemented by the Obama administration in 2015  the commission voted to end those rules Thursday.
 Pai  spent the majority of  his  closing argument reiterating  his  position on why the Orwellian-named net neutrality rules â which essentially implemented federal oversight of the internet under Title II regulations created in the 1930s to manage the Ma Bell telephone monopoly â had been an Obama administration mistake.
Prior to 2015 when net neutrality was implemented  the internet was regulated under what  Pai  is fond of calling a âlight-touch frameworkâ; simply put  the federal government had less regulatory oversight which allowed internet service providers and tech companies the ability to invest and innovate. Thatâs why the internet is as robust and efficient as it is.
 Pai  said the net neutrality rules were âexpress ordersâ from the Obama White House to the FCC  and led to less innovation and investment in the internet framework for the last two years  citing several specific examples. The environment that allowed the internet to thrive before the Obama-era rules âwasnât heavy-handedâ¦regulation â  Pai  said  which led to the $1.5 trillion investment in internet services and networks that gave America unfettered access.
 He  also noted  in contradiction to dissenting Democrat commissioners Jessica Rosenworcel and Mignon Clyburn (who delivered a nearly 20 minute âeulogyâ to net neutrality)  that people who complain about the internet donât complain about Internet Service Providers (ISPs) potentially blocking or throttling content  or that they might discriminate against Internet traffic of their competitors. Instead they complain that thereâs not enough choice regarding ISPs and that they might have no access at.
 Pai  noted that a lighter touch regulatory environment  where ISPs are free to start up and innovate  would address both of those problem.
In short   Pai  said the decision to overturn net neutrality âis not going to destroy the internetâ¦is not going to kill democracy  [and] is not going to stifle free expression online.â

Ex Output:
BREAKING: FCC Overturns Net Neutrality


Ex Input:
The inauguration of  President Trump  on Jan. 20  2017. (Jonathan Newton /The Washington Post)
During his campaign and tumultuous first year in office   President Trump  demonstrated little knowledge of policy details.  He  was not interested in advice that conflicted with  his  instincts  and it was often impossible for White House staff to figure out what course he wanted to take. One compared it to âtrying to figure out what a child wants.â
 Trump  is depicted as presiding over a chaotic White House  struggling to settle into  his  new reality and eagerly trying to maintain  his  normal golf habits.
In the book  set to be officially released next week  Wolff writes that  Trump  became upset that  he  couldnât give a Supreme Court seat to a friend rather than someone  he  didnât know.  He  casts  Trump  as having âlittle or no interestâ in Republican attempts to overhaul the Affordable Care Act. And Wolff says aides were incredulous over Trumpâs claims that President Obama had âwiretappedâ Trump Tower during the 2016 campaign.
 Trump  aides vigorously sought to undermine the book on Wednesday  with White House press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders saying in a statement that it is âfilled with false and misleading accounts from individuals who have no access or influence with the White House.â
Wolff says that his book is based on 200 conversations over the past 18 months with  Trump   most members of his senior staff  some of whom he talked to dozens of times  and many people with whom they had spoken. Some conversations were on the record  while others were off the record or on âdeep background â allowing him to relay a âdisembodied description of events provided by an unnamed witness to them.â
At a White House briefing Wednesday afternoon  Sanders said  Trump  only had âone brief conversationâ with Wolff and that most dialogue with White House staff was coordinated by one person: former chief strategist Stephen K. Bannon  whom  Trump  dismissed in an unusually harsh statement  saying he âhas nothing to do with me or my presidency.â
[ Trump  slams Bannon: âWhen he was fired  he not only lost his job  he lost his mindâ]
During the campaign â which few aides expected  Trump  to win â and the transition that followed  Wolff writes about several instances in which Trumpâs lack of knowledge and interest in public affairs was evident.
Early in the campaign  for example   Trump  aide Sam Nunberg was sent to explain the Constitution to the candidate  Wolff writes  and Nunberg offered this assessment of the experience: âI got as far as the Fourth Amendment before his finger is pulling down on his lip and his eyes are rolling back in his head.â
Wolff reports that in early August 2016   Trump  asked former Fox News chairman Roger Ailes to take over management of the campaign. Ailes turned him down  Wolff writes  because he knew of Trumpâs disinclination to take advice âor even listen to it.â
After  Trump  prevailed   Trump  turned to Ailes for advice on a chief of staff  the book says.
âWhoâs that?â  Trump  reportedly asked  unaware that Boehner had been the speaker of the House until he was forced out in a tea party putsch in 2015.
Wolff also writes that Reince Priebus â the chairman of the Republican National Committee who later became the chief of staff â was alarmed how often during the transition  Trump  offered people jobs on the spot  including many  he  had never met before.
Wolff writes that one of the reasons  Trump  didnât want John Bolton  a famously hawkish diplomat  as his national security adviser  was because of his mustache.
âBoltonâs mustache is a problem â Wolff quotes Bannon saying. â Trump  doesnât think  he  looks the part.â

Ex Output:

Trump portrayed as uninformed unprepared and lacking focus in unflattering new book


