Teacher:You need to read the given passage and construct a question about the information present in the passage. The question should be answerable from the passage. Most importantly, only those questions are allowed whose answers cannot be determined from a single sentence. Do not generate questions that require only a single sentence to answer. Instead, try to combine two sentences and create a question from that combination. Do not create open-ended questions, i.e., the answers to them cannot be found precisely from the information provided in the passage.
Teacher: Now, understand the problem? Solve this instance: Paragraph- Sent 1: Former Long Beach Executive Director Toby Rothschild, now a policy wonk in Iwasaki's outfit, agreed.
Sent 2: "To some extent, I did look at it and say, 'We are the littlest kid on the block, and we don't want to get beat up so we need a bigger protector,'" Rothschild said.
Sent 3: "Once we got past that, it became a real positive for the Long Beach program and Long Beach clients."Sent 4: But to the San Gabriel-Pomona Valley legal aid program, the positives of merging with Dudovitz's program, San Fernando Valley Neighborhood Legal Services, were never obvious.
Sent 5: A meeting in late 1999 between Dudovitz and the San Gabriel-Pomona Valley program's board showed how little the two programs had in common and how difficult bridging the gap between their ideologies would be, Dudovitz recalled.
Sent 6: Although no merger plans were discussed, board members at the smaller program knew of Dudovitz's preference for impact litigation over direct services.
Sent 7: "We had a discussion about what our separate views were," Dudovitz said.
Sent 8: "The message we got was that they wanted their program to stay as it was."Sent 9: Lauralea Saddick, former executive director of the San Gabriel-Pomona Valley program, said her board simply did not share Dudovitz's desire to spend money influencing social policy and participating in high-profile litigation over poverty-related issues.
Sent 10: "Our board's philosophy was that the money given by the federal government was to help people with basic everyday needs," Saddick said.
Sent 11: "It might take a little bit of humility to take those kinds of cases.
Sent 12: Impact work is very important ... but what was the good of getting the law changed if no one is there to help the individual?"Sent 13: Before the San Gabriel program was subsumed by Dudovitz's group, it offered to merge with the Legal Aid Society of Orange County.
Sent 14: The boards of both organizations eschewed impact litigation in favor of the 1960s model of providing direct client services.
Sent 15: Supported by resolutions from the Pasadena, San Gabriel, Eastern and Foothill bar associations, the two programs drew up plans to merge and submitted them to the Legal Services Corp. Dudovitz won Iwasaki's backing to oppose the deal, and Legal Services Corp., the national funding source, overruled the proposed San Gabriel-Pomona Valley/Orange County merger.
Sent 16: On Jan. 27, 2001, the federal agency awarded the San Gabriel-Pomona Valley service area to Dudovitz under the umbrella of an expanded San Fernando program, citing the location of both programs in Los Angeles, which would allow "better coordinated and more effective advocacy on county government policies."Sent 17: The San Gabriel-Pomona Valley program sued Legal Services Corp. to stop the takeover, claiming the federal program based the decision on favoritism for the politically active Dudovitz and the politically powerful Iwasaki.
Sent 18: Though the federal suit accomplished little, it effectively suspended the end of the old program and the start of the new one for nearly a year.
Student:
A meeting in late 1999 showed that which two programs had very little in common?