Given a document, generate a short title of the document. The title should convey the main idea/event/topic about which the document is being written. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].

[EX Q]: Trump  was aware of the issue a couple of weeks before a conversation with then-FBI Director James B. Comey in which Comey said the president asked him if he could be lenient while investigating Flynn  whom  Trump  had just fired for misleading Pence about the nature of his conversations with the Russian.
According to notes kept by Comey   Trump  asked if he could see “his way clear to letting this go  to letting Flynn go.”  Trump  fired Comey in May.
In a pre-dawn tweet Sunday   Trump  issued a fresh rebuttal to Comey  writing: “I never asked Comey to stop investigating Flynn. Just more Fake News covering another Comey lie!” The tweet was part of a running commentary from  Trump  that began Saturday  a day after Flynn pleaded guilty to lying to the FBI and indicated he would cooperate with special counsel Robert S. Mueller III  who is probing Russian interference in the 2016 election.
Dowd confirmed Sunday that he had drafted the tweet for  Trump  and acknowledged that it was sloppily worded. He said it was inaccurate to say  the president  was told that Flynn had lied to the FBI. Dowd said Sunday that  Trump  knew only what acting attorney general Sally Yates had told the White House counsel: that Flynn’s accounts to the agents interviewing him were the same as those Flynn gave Pence  and “that the [Justice] Department was not accusing him of lying.”
Dowd played down the significance of  Trump ’s tweet. He said he did not intend to make news and declared  “I’m out of the tweeting business.”
[Graphic: Here’s what we know so far about  Team Trump’s  ties to Russian interests]
If  Trump  knew that Flynn might not have been accurate with the FBI  it could provide motivation for any alleged effort to obstruct justice  said Barak Cohen  a former federal prosecutor who does white-collar defense work at the Perkins Coie law firm. “It bolsters the intent for committing obstruction ” he said.
The person  who  like others  spoke on the condition of anonymity to speak candidly  said that White House officials quickly realized the tweet could significantly assist Mueller if he chooses to pursue an obstruction case. The development sparked particular concern because others around  Trump  were not certain that  Trump  knew Flynn had made a false statement to the FBI at the time he fired him  the person added.
McGahn was told Jan. 30 that the material was ready for his review  the officials said. On that night   Trump  fired Yates over her refusal to defend his travel ban.
A person familiar with McGahn’s account says the White House counsel did not give  Trump  any indication in January that Flynn had violated the law in his FBI interview or tell  the president  that  he  believed Flynn was under criminal investigation.
As controversy built Sunday about  Trump’s  actions  he sought to focus attention on news that Peter Strzok — the former top FBI official assigned to Mueller’s probe of Russian interference in the 2016 election — was taken off that job this summer after his bosses discovered that he and another member of Mueller’s team had exchanged politically charged texts disparaging  Trump  and supporting Democrat Hillary Clinton.
“Report: ‘ANTI-TRUMP FBI AGENT LED CLINTON EMAIL PROBE’ Now it all starts to make sense!”  Trump  wrote.  He  also criticized the FBI and promised to bring it back to “greatness” under  his  administration.
“After years of Comey  with the phony and dishonest Clinton investigation (and more)  running the FBI  its reputation is in Tatters - worst in History!”  Trump  wrote on Twitter. “But fear not  we will bring it back to greatness.”
[EX A]: Trump lawyer says president knew Flynn had given FBI the same account he gave to vice president

[EX Q]: In a full-throated denunciation of the work   Trump  tweeted Thursday night that  he  had authorized "zero access to White House (actually turned  him  down many times) for author of phony book!"
"I never spoke to  him  for book  " Trump  wrote. "Full of lies  misrepresentations and sources that donât exist. Look at  this guy âs past and watch what happens to  him  and Sloppy Steve [Bannon]!"
In an earlier statement  Trump  had blasted Bannon   his  former White House strategist and a major on-the-record source for the book  saying  he  had "lost  his  mind."
As for  Trump 's charges that the book is not credible  Wolff responded: "My credibility is being question by a man who has less credibility than perhaps anyone who has walked the earth."
I authorized Zero access to White House (actually turned  him  down many times) for author of phony book! I never spoke to  him  for book. Full of lies  misrepresentations and sources that donât exist. Look at  this guy âs past and watch what happens to  him  and Sloppy Steve!  â Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) January 5  2018
 On  Trump 's charge that  he  had not authorized Wolff to spend time at the White House to report on the book  the author said  "What was I doing there if  he  didn't want me to be there?"
Asked  his  reaction to the president's effort to block the publication  Wolff said it only served to boost sales: "Where do I send the box of chocolates?"
Wolff said  Trump  is "not only helping me sell books  but helping me prove the point of the book."
He said he not only spoke to  Trump   but also to top White House officials who met with the president daily  sometimes on a minute-by-minute basis.
Wolff said he had only one question in mind in writing the book: "What is it like to work for  Donald Trump   how can you work for  Donald Trump   and how do you feel having worked for  Donald Trump ?"
In the book   he  paints a portrait of a disorganized White House run by a mercurial  uninformed president who is constantly minded by other to keep  him  on track and focused.
Wolff said his sources repeatedly referred to  Trump  as "like a child" who "has a need for immediate gratification." Wolff said.
Even this week  on the question of sending a cease-and-desist letter to the book publishers   Trump  brushed aside in-house advice that  he  shouldn't do it  Wolff said. " He  just insists â  he  has to be satisfied in the moment."
[EX A]: Michael Wolff: Author denies Trump's claims they never spoke for book

[EX Q]: Hennepin County Attorney Mike Freeman  declined to confirm the grand jury  citing the secrecy of any such proceeding  but said  he  still intends to make  his  own decision on whether to charge the officer.
Justine Ruszczyk Damond  a 40-year-old life coach  was killed by Minneapolis Officer Mohamed Noor just minutes after she called police to report a possible sexual assault in the alley behind her home. Noor hasn't been charged  and  Freeman  said weeks ago that more investigating was needed in the case. He also told activists in a recorded conversation that he didn't have enough evidence and investigators "haven't done their job."
In recent years   Freeman  has said he would no longer use grand juries to decide whether officers would be charged in police shootings  saying he would make those decisions himself to provide more accountability and transparency.
Marsh Halberg  a criminal defense attorney who is not connected to this case  said it could give  Freeman  a strategic advantage by requiring witnesses to testify under oath and lock down witness testimony in advance of a possible trial. Still  Halberg said  it's unclear whether a grand jury can be used strictly for investigative purposes on the state level  and it's not something he has seen in his 40-year career.
Halberg said  Freeman  could be using the grand jury as "a tactical reason to get evidence from people who are maybe refusing to testify."
Robert Bennett  an attorney for the Damond family  said he and the family support  Freeman 's use of the grand jury and think it's the right thing to do. Bennett said it's disappointing that subpoenas were necessary to get witnesses  including police officers  to be truthful.
Noor's attorney  Thomas Plunkett  issued a statement saying  Freeman 's comments "leave me unclear as to what he is doing." He added that "it would be unethical and potentially unlawful to comment publicly on this development. Worse â any public comment would jeopardize the fairness of an important judicial function."
The grand jury process has been criticized for its secrecy and because it rarely results in charges against officers.  Freeman  broke precedent with the standard practice of using grand juries to decide charges in police shootings after the November 2015 death of Jamar Clark.  Freeman  noted at that time that grand juries had been used to consider police shootings in  his  county for more than 40 years and no officers had been indicted.
[EX A]:
Grand jury convened in police killing of Australian woman

