Problem: Your Honor, as you know, we've got the question of whether or not these are admissible for effect. Our position on that we've articulated. I don't know if you want us to argue at greater length or brief, but it's hearsay to the extent it's offered for the truth of the matter asserted as effect.

Based on the paragraph above can we conclude that "The subjects at hand are not admissible "?

A: It's impossible to say


Problem: (b) are comparable to the employee benefits of the employee immediately before ceasing to be an employee of the local port corporation and at a rate of contribution by the employee not greater than the rate that was applicable in respect of the employee immediately before ceasing to be an employee of the local port corporation; and

Based on the paragraph above can we conclude that "The employees aren't happy with the benefits"?

A: It's impossible to say


Problem: Witta son of Wecta is mentioned as a Jutish chieftain in the 449 entry of the "Anglo-Saxon Chronicle" as the father of Wihtgils and the grandfather of Hengest and Horsa. He also appears in the same role in Henry of Huntingdon's "Historia Anglorum". He is most probably mythological, but as a historical person he would have been born around 400 AD.

Based on the paragraph above can we conclude that "Horsa had a sister."?

A:
It's impossible to say