Problem: A pleasant place it was , -- so clean and cool , and as full of sweet odors as if the ghosts of buttercups and clover still haunted the milk which they had helped to make .<br>Dolly was churning , and Polly was making up butter in nice little pats .<br>Both were very kind , and let Daisy peep everywhere .<br>All round on white shelves stood the shining pans , full of milk ; the stone floor was wet ; and a stream of water ran along a narrow bed through the room , and in it stood jars of butter , pots of cream , and cans of milk .<br>The window was open , and hop-vines shook their green bells before it .

Based on the paragraph above can we conclude that "The bed was wide."?

A: No


Problem: How to take action against pollution on private property<br>Locate the appropriate state or local agency. Depending on the type of pollution or environmental hazard present, you may need to file a complaint with a particular state or local agency to get the problem resolved. [substeps] You may have to call your state agency in charge of environmental affairs to find out the appropriate agency with which to place your complaint.

Based on the paragraph above can we conclude that "Filing a complaint isn’t dependent at all in the type of pollution "?

A: No


Problem: General Olson, you say that the functional equivalent of an unlimited time would be a violation, but that's precisely the argument that's being made by petitioners here, that a limited time which is extendable is the functionable, functional equivalent of an unlimited time, a limited time that 10 years from now can be extended, and then extended again, and extended again. Why -- their argument is precisely that, a limited time doesn't mean anything unless it means, once you have established the limit for works that have been created under that limit, that's the end.

Based on the paragraph above can we conclude that "General Olson has been a General for at least ten years."?

A:
It's impossible to say