Problem: That might not play well with U.S. officials: White House press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders on Wednesday specifically praised Mexico for stopping the migrants from getting rides."Mexico has stepped up in an unprecedented way," Sanders told Fox News. "They have helped stop a lot of the transportation means of these individuals in these caravans, forcing them walking. They have helped us in new ways to slow this down, to break this up and keep it from moving as aggressively toward the United States."

Based on the paragraph above can we conclude that "Sarah Sanders praised Mexico on the weekend for stopping the migrants from getting rides"?

A: Yes


Problem: Okay, and is your argument that we find and hold against their retrospective because there is some, at least plausible basis should so argument, to say that there can be a causal connection between the retrospective extension and some benefit that can be traced to those particular works through the retrospective extension, like dissemination? Is that your argument?

Based on the paragraph above can we conclude that "The speaker is trying to clarify someone else's position. "?

A: Yes


Problem: Saddam Hussein accepted an 11th-hour offer to flee into exile weeks ahead of the U.S.-led 2003 invasion, but Arab League officials scuttled the proposal, officials in this Gulf state claimed.

Based on the paragraph above can we conclude that "The United States offered candy to the Arab League."?

A:
It's impossible to say