Problem:
Read the following paragraph and determine if the hypothesis is true:

Expanding offences for which a youth is presumed to receive an adult sentence to include a pattern of convictions for serious violent offences and extending the group of offenders who are expected to receive an adult sentence to include 14 and 15 year olds will be welcomed by most Canadians.

OPTIONS:
- Yes
- It's impossible to say
- No
Hypothesis: Canadian 14-year-olds will receive adult sentences.
****
Answer:
It's impossible to say


[Q]: Rodriguez was spotted by a witness running away from the stairwell where the backpack was found seconds before it went off. Rodriguez did not know where the stairwell was. OPTIONS:
- Yes
- It's impossible to say
- No
[A]: No


Problem: Chuck buys a car<br>Chuck was having trouble with his old car. He knew it would soon be time to get a new one. Chuck decides enough is enough. He heads down to the dealership to pick a car out. He finds the Mustang of his dreams and buys it.

Based on the paragraph above can we conclude that "Chuck has nightmares about Mustangs."? OPTIONS:
- Yes
- It's impossible to say
- No

A: No


Q: Some Nakoda Stony tribal leaders have done things that are improper, to say the least.
In the second petition, the petitioners are calling on Parliament to conduct a thorough internal investigation including an extended forensic audit going back to the 1980s on the illegal, immoral and corrupt political practices and injustices which are being committed by some Nakoda Stony tribal leaders on the reserve population, especially those who have dominated since the 1960s.
OPTIONS:
- Yes
- It's impossible to say
- No
A: Yes


Sam's Mess<br>Sam went eat at a fast food restaurant. He sat down with his drink. Sam spilled his drink all over the table. He asked the cashier for some napkins. Sam cleaned up the mess he made.
Sam has never had a drink. OPTIONS:
- Yes
- It's impossible to say
- No
A: No


Problem:
Read the following paragraph and determine if the hypothesis is true:

But there has to be a limit, as you acknowledge. Perpetual copyright is not permitted. Who is the judge of -- within that line? Who is the judge of when it becomes unlimited? Is there, in other words, judicial review and, if there is, what standard would this Court apply to determine whether something short of perpetual is still unlimited?

OPTIONS:
- Yes
- It's impossible to say
- No
Hypothesis: Copyrights aren't for forever.
****
Answer:

Yes