Problem: Neverland Valley Ranch, owned by Michael Jackson, is to be sold at auction on March 19, 2008, unless Jackson pays over US$24 million. Financial Title Company, the trustee of his Santa Barbara County, California, home and amusement park, has foreclosed on the property. They notified Jackson of the foreclosure and sale on Monday. Jackson had only just recently paid an overdue property tax bill of $600,000.

Based on the paragraph above can we conclude that "The property was foreclosed on by Financial Title Company."? OPTIONS:
- Yes
- It's impossible to say
- No

A: Yes


Problem: No. That's too amorphous a question. The issue here, I'll restate, is the veracity of the articles themselves, did the reporter hear the statement as reported. If it was taken out of context, we're not going to delve into that in this examination. The individual who believes -- who was quoted and believes the statement was taken out of context or flatly that he didn't or she didn't say it and it's inaccurate will have the opportunity to say that during the defendants case-in-chief or at any other time during the trial.

Based on the paragraph above can we conclude that "The question is too ambiguous"? OPTIONS:
- Yes
- It's impossible to say
- No

A: Yes


Problem: It was sometime in 2004. It was prior to the June meetings because my husband was a teacher at the school, so I often heard things that he would come home and tell me. So I knew that there was some discussion over the biology book, so sometime before that. I can't tell you exactly when.

Based on the paragraph above can we conclude that "The School was a High School."? OPTIONS:
- Yes
- It's impossible to say
- No

A:
It's impossible to say