input hypothesis: After 1970 the USS "PC-1168" was no longer in use. 
Context: USS "PC-1168" was a "PC-461"-class submarine chaser built for the United States Navy during World War II. "PC-1168" is notable for being the ship on which the film "You're in the Navy Now", which starred Gary Cooper, was filmed in 1950. The ship was later transferred to the Republic of China Navy, serving from 1954 to 1970 as ROCS "Ching Kiang" (PC-116).
OPTIONS:
- Yes
- It's impossible to say
- No
true or false: Yes


Context:
How to tell your friends about your ptsd<br>Decide which friends you want to tell. Deciding to share your ptsd with your friends is a huge step. There may be some friends you are closer to than others, or friends you feel more comfortable around.
Hypothesis: Deciding to tell your friends about your PTSD is not a step in telling your friends about your PTSD. OPTIONS:
- Yes
- It's impossible to say
- No
No


Input: OPTIONS:
- Yes
- It's impossible to say
- No

Anorexia in males accounted for approximately six percent of cases seen in an eating disorder clinic.

Sentence: The disorder accounted for less than 28%

Output: Yes


Problem:
Read the following paragraph and determine if the hypothesis is true:

Flowers<br>Jill wanted a flower garden. So she got gardening supplies and seeds. After a week, her flower garden was complete. And she took care of it everyday. Gardening became Jill's favorite hobby.

OPTIONS:
- Yes
- It's impossible to say
- No
Hypothesis: Jill also liked to sew.
****
Answer:
It's impossible to say


[Q]: Margaret Bryan, Baroness Bryan (c. 1468 – c. 1551/52) was Lady Governess to Henry VIII's children: Princess Mary, Princess Elizabeth, Henry FitzRoy and Prince Edward. The position of Lady Governess in her day resembled less that of the popular modern idea of a governess, more that of a nanny. Henry VIII's four children were looked after primarily by a Baroness, namely Lady Governess Margaret Bryan, OPTIONS:
- Yes
- It's impossible to say
- No
[A]: Yes


[Q]: Mr. Lessig, on your First Amendment argument I don't see where the retroactivity-prospectivity comes in, because -- I follow your argument under the Copyright Clause, but if you're saying that the time is too long, the public domain should get this stuff sooner rather than later, would you explain to me how your prospectivity-retrospective line fits into your First Amendment claim? Lessig has talked to clinton OPTIONS:
- Yes
- It's impossible to say
- No
[A]:
It's impossible to say