Input: OPTIONS:
- Yes
- It's impossible to say
- No

The first is to give the people of Canada more democratic control over representation in the upper house by electing those representatives, and to ensure that senators, whoever they are and whatever they are and whatever they do, are servants of the people of Canada, not servants of the party of the prime minister who appointed them.

Sentence: A lot of people do agree

Output: It's impossible to say


Input: OPTIONS:
- Yes
- It's impossible to say
- No

To break the grinding cycle of debt and poverty, Yunus loaned $27 to Begum and more than 40 of her neighbours in the village of Joba. He allowed them to pay him back over the next year as their businesses started to produce stable profits.

Sentence: loaning money is popular

Output: It's impossible to say


Input: OPTIONS:
- Yes
- It's impossible to say
- No

In Africa today, the majority of infected people acquire HIV by the time they are in their 20s or 30s and, on average, die within ten years.

Sentence: It is impossible for Africans to get HIV.

Output: No


Input: OPTIONS:
- Yes
- It's impossible to say
- No

Could we then go back to Justice O'Connor's question? To make that very specific, if we agree with you, does that mean that we would, in principle, have to hold the 1976 extension unconstitutional? I mean, in 1976, Congress extended the term from 28 years renewable once, to life of the author plus 50 years. Now they're extending it life of the author plus 70. If the latter is unconstitutional on your theory, how could the former not be? And if the former is, the chaos that would ensue would be horrendous.

Sentence: The 1976 extension could be unconstitutional and off putting.

Output:
Yes