Can we draw the following hypothesis from the context (see options)? 

Context:

We have 125 years of history of this Court making sure that the limits, both express and implied, in the Copyright Clause, have some meaning. The Feist opinion very clearly sets out the implied limits, a per se limit for originality, for the reasons Justice Breyer was trying to get me to say.

Hypothesis: The Feist opinion outlines limits that are implied and the court has a history of making sure the limits are meaningful.
Choose from: -- Yes. -- It's impossible to say. -- No.
Yes