Q: Generate a context and a hypothesis.

Generated: Context: I -- no, Justice Ginsburg, we would not, and the reason is again related to the method we have adopted to interpret "limited times." We have not said that "promote the progress of science" is a general and independent constraint on the Copyright Clause authority. We've said it must be looked to to interpret the scope of "limited times," and unless retrospective extensions are forbidden, it will eviscerate the meaning of "limited times." That does not occur in the context of the scope of exclusive right, nor in the context of the power to secure. If that's --

Hypothesis: This is a court case.


Q: Generate a context and a hypothesis.

Generated: Context: Think the U.S. is in a slump? Check out the World GDP numbers for 2009. The U.S. percentage of output has remained remarkably stable, even with recent economic troubles, even with spikes in contributions by so-called “Asian tigers” (rrrarr!)–India, China, and the like. But on a per-person, level how does the output of workers in other countries stack up against the output of U.S. laborers? FastCompany.com adjusted for population and crunched the data. Infographic: Rob Vargas

Hypothesis: fastcompany.com is not reliable


Q: Generate a context and a hypothesis.

Generated: Context: Donald Trump views the mainstream press with contempt, and the mainstream press returns the favor. Or is it the other way around? Just as the president has trouble distinguishing between negative press coverage and "fake news," the journalists who cover him tend to treat every inaccurate, unfounded, or even debatable statement he makes as a lie. And that mistake, suggests Jacob Sullum, clouds the judgment and damages the credibility of reporters and commentators who aspire to skepticism but too often settle for reflexive disbelief. View this article.

Hypothesis: The press does not like Donald Trump


Q: Generate a context and a hypothesis.

Generated:
Context: Last shot<br>It was win or go home for Carl's basketball team. Carl had the chance to win the game but missed. That was last year. This year Carl worked harder to get better. The same situation came this year but this time Carl made the shot.

Hypothesis: Carl's teammates blamed Carl for the loss.