Problem: The Sudanese government reiterated on Saturday that it would not retreat from its decision to expel more than a dozen of international nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) operating relief work in its western region of Darfur. Sudanese Vice President Ali Osman Mohammed Taha made the remarks at the opening session of the conference of Arab civil society institutions. "The government's decision to expel some of the organizations is a sovereign decision which was dictated by the national interest. We will not back down from this decision whatever the pressures," Taha said.

Based on the paragraph above can we conclude that "The people running Sudan want to let people know they will not go back on their decision"?

A: Yes


Problem: I am not trying to be too cute here, but there is a good case to be made, both in terms of the bill itself having listed the territories, and rightly so, and the rights of aboriginal people as established both in the constitution and by constitutional convention going back to the Charlottetown accord when Ovide Mercredi was at the table.

Based on the paragraph above can we conclude that "this person has made cases before this"?

A: It's impossible to say


Problem: Blue Mountain Lumber said today it may have to relocate a $30 million project offshore in the wake of an Environment Court decision that blocked it from a planned development site on the Coromandel.

Based on the paragraph above can we conclude that "Yellow Mountain Lumber said today it may have to relocate a $30 million project offshore."?

A:
No