Problem: -- I really think this is an important question and, as Justice O'Connor points out, if we have to ask what's the most plausible explanation for this rule, to reward existing vested interest or to stimulate former new works, it seems to me that it's probably the former.

Based on the paragraph above can we conclude that "Justice O’Conner doesn’t explain anything "? OPTIONS:
- Yes
- It's impossible to say
- No

A: No


Problem: The New Guy<br>The new guy at work is odd. Just yesterday, he yelled at a co-worker. Then when he apologized, he ended up yelling even more! His co-worker took offense and punched him. Now, the new guy at work is much, much more quiet.

Based on the paragraph above can we conclude that "The New Guy has talked to bush"? OPTIONS:
- Yes
- It's impossible to say
- No

A: It's impossible to say


Problem: But they see a compassionate, strong, great first lady in Laura Bush. I can't tell you how lucky I am. When I met her in the backyard at Joe and Jan O'Neill's in Midland, Texas, it was the classic backyard barbecue. O'Neill said, "Come on over. I think you'll find somebody who might interest you. "So I said all right. Bopped over there. There was only four of us there. And not only did she interest me, I guess you would say it was love at first sight.

Based on the paragraph above can we conclude that "Laura Bush was in Kansas during the barbecue"? OPTIONS:
- Yes
- It's impossible to say
- No

A:
No