In the first one, the petitioners call upon the government to put the surplus accumulated in the employment insurance account back into the pockets of the unemployed by revoking the current eligibility rules for new entrants and using surpluses for training for the unemployed, thereby promoting direct employment.

Can we draw the following conclusion?
In the first one, the petitioners call upon the government to put the surplus accumulated in the employment insurance account back into the pockets of the employed

pick from the following. [i] Yes. [ii] It's impossible to say. [iii] No.
[iii]