Problem: I thought my opinion was clear in that regard, and as you appropriately characterize, no questions as to bias or motivation or reasons to misrepresent quotes would be allowed in. There I believe we would decidedly fly in the face of established case law.

Based on the paragraph above can we conclude that "the speaker wants everything on record to be clear"? OPTIONS:
- Yes
- It's impossible to say
- No

A: It's impossible to say


Problem: A 15ft (4.5 meter) northern bottle-nosed whale has been spotted swimming in the river Thames in Central London, UK. The "Thames whale" managed to swim up past the Thames barrier and under many bridges, reaching as far as Chelsea before it turned around just before Albert Bridge. TV news helicopters scrambled to provide live TV footage of the whale, and many spectators lined the banks of the river. The whale is said to be looking healthy, although some fear that the whale may beach itself as it tried to do before rescuers forced it back into the middle of the river. Normally found in the North Atlantic, there have been sightings of a second whale near Southend.

Based on the paragraph above can we conclude that "An animal that can be longer than three feet is a northern bottle-nosed whale."? OPTIONS:
- Yes
- It's impossible to say
- No

A: Yes


Problem: The 2017 EFL League Two play-off Final was a football match that was contested between Blackpool and Exeter City. The match was played at Wembley Stadium on 28 May 2017. Blackpool won the game 2-1 and were promoted to League One for the 2017-18 season.

Based on the paragraph above can we conclude that "no-one knew that blackpool would win the game"? OPTIONS:
- Yes
- It's impossible to say
- No

A:
It's impossible to say