Can we draw the following hypothesis from the context? 

Context:

Whereas if you don't accept the Copyright Clause claim, then, in order to make the First Amendment analysis we've simply got to say, well, gee, is the promotion of useful art and so on more important than the public domain, and can we say that that allows a distinction between 50 years and 70 years?

Hypothesis: It takes a lawyer to understand the copyright clause
It's impossible to say