-- I really think this is an important question and, as Justice O'Connor points out, if we have to ask what's the most plausible explanation for this rule, to reward existing vested interest or to stimulate former new works, it seems to me that it's probably the former.

Choose your answer: based on the paragraph above can we conclude that "The most plausible explanation of this rule favors stimulating former new works "?

Select from the following. a. Yes b. It's impossible to say c. No
I think the answer is
c.