We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.

[EX Q]: Sent1: You cannot kill somebody just because they've broken into your house, you have to have a well founded fear of harm.
 Sent2: If you chose to kill someone who wasn't endangering your life at the moment you deserve to be killed.
[EX A]: Not similar

[EX Q]: Sent1: In fact, I think if Jesus did not believe in the death penalty, it would make his sacrifice that much greater, because he would be being unjustly put to death.
 Sent2: And because Christ forgave the men that unjustly killed him does not conclusivly show that He was against the death penalty.
[EX A]: Not similar

[EX Q]: Sent1: If the death penalty were an adequate deterrent then we would not have murder.
 Sent2: If we slap a guarantueed death penalty on murder then any following murderer commits the crime on pain of death which is a much better detterent.
[EX A]:
Not similar

