Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.

All window dressing.  Trying to lure a few rational republicans back into the fold to keep the party from completely melting down.  Problem is, the same element that is cheering for Trump still calls themselves republicans.  This election is already in the bag for the dems.  The best the repubs can do is make a reach with Ryan in 2020, if the party survives.

Plenty to not like about Clinton.  I don't plan to vote for her.  But Trump is so bad that you'd have to hate America to vote for him.  Time to vote for a third party candidate.  If they get enough votes they may get to play in the 2020 sandbox.  Wouldn't the debates be a lot more interesting with a third perspective on the stage?

The congressional elections are sure going to be interesting for the next couple cycles...
Yes

"Leave your entitled attitude behind when you leave anchorage. Drivers out here are not accustomed to this and are not expecting it."

"We are constantly ran off sidewalks by riders speeding by. The entitled attitudes are not endearing."

Seems that everyone believes that bicyclists are behaving "entitled".  I side with the sidewalk pedestrians.  Bikes are vehicles that belong on the roads.  The car drivers should leave their entitled attitudes at home.  Better yet, they should get their fat butts on a bicycle since most of them need the exercise.
Yes

Bill Boyd says that people are confused about rail.  He also says that population along the route is already "above $600,000."  Who's confused?  Rail assumes that 15,000 people will walk to it.  That's a joke because there is very little housing along the rail line.  Mufi said that rail will be impossible to stop once it gets far enough along.  In my opinion, the Final Environmental Impact Statement, which included the 15,000 projection, was the first step.  Too much of it was fabricated.  It was designed just to get the project started.

No

