Argument:1. Moreover , the level of enjoyment that individuals derive from their jobs - and thus the nature of the hedonic calculus that they engage in when determining whether a particular job will fully account for their needs - is linked partly to the variety and difficulty of the tasks they must accomplish .
2. Law represents a sustained and engaging intellectual challenge , and a challenge ideally suited to the skills of most humanities graduates .
3. Law Schools teaches you to think more critically , and legal work offers the opportunity to engage in a largely intellectual pursuit with other highly intellectual individuals .
4. Law students are likely to develop a wider range of intellectual skills throughout their careers , and will be better able to transition in to different jobs and different areas of the legal industry if needed .
Claim: Law school helps graduates to think more clearly making them more attractive to other employers.


Sentences: 1. As a result , they often cause on-going harm to victims who can not feel safe in their communities even after the conflict has ended .
2. The intention of many crimes of war is to destroy and demoralise individuals and communities .
3. While full compensation is impossible , both the symbolic realisation of justice and the illustration of real commitment to prevention allows people to rebuild their lives to some extent .
4. For victims , prosecuting war criminals has a vital cathartic function in helping them , to some extent , to come to terms with the crimes committed against them and their families .
5. Failure to prosecute sends victims a message that the attacks on their freedoms were somehow acceptable .
What claim can be made from these sentences?
Prosecution provides closure for the victims of war crimes.


This House calls for the increased use of referendums.
Claim: Redresses imbalance between state and individual.


Question:
Summarize the argument implied by these sentences. 1. Young people want to explore their own , and one anothers , bodies from quite an early age , long before they would be likely to settle down and get married .
2. Sex for almost everyone in Western countries is not something exclusive to marriage , and most people have multiple sexual partners in their lifetimes .
3. Sex and sexual identity is fundamental part of human life .
4. Sexual desire , for both procreation and recreation , forms one of the core human drives that shapes behaviour .
5. A safe , objective environment in which the objective physical facts and the emotional aspects of sexual involvement and activity is provided is essential to facilitate young people to come to grips with sexual identity as it is essential for full development as a person .
6. In order to face this reality , young people must be armed with the knowledge of what sexual intercourse entails and the pleasures and the risks inherent in it .
7. Sexual identity itself can be very confusing , especially for young homosexual or transgender people who may not understand their sexuality .
Answer:
A safe framework for understanding sexuality and sexual identity are essential to human existence


Question: What claim can be made from the following pieces of evidence?
1. When a massacre is about to happen it is legal to intervene to prevent that massacre .
2. The Responsibility to Protect which was accepted by the UN in 2005 .
3. And the use of force must be proportionate which since there is no plan for a full scale invasion in Syria it will be .
4. As the doctrine states peaceful means must have been tried and in Syria after two years of conflict we can safely say a peaceful resolution is not in sight .
5. Even the UK government accepts that there must be convincing evidence , generally accepted by the international community as a whole , of extreme humanitarian distress on a large scale , requiring immediate and urgent relief .
6. It must be proved that the Syrian regime is responsible for the attacks ; the US and UK say there is such evidence but so far the link is not crystal clear .
7. This is most certainly the case in Syria where the national authorities are the ones doing much of the killing .
8. Though this will only happen should peaceful means be inadequate and national authorities are manifestly failing to protect their populations .
9. In this context , we are prepared to take collective action in a timely and decisive manner .
10. Resolution 60/1 at the 2005 World Summit stated , there was international responsibility to help to protect populations from genocide , war crimes , ethnic cleansing and crimes against humanity .

Claim: A moral imperative to intervene


Argument:1. In the status quo , Scottish and Welsh MPs get to vote on issues that do not affect their constituents , but may be pivotal in getting through legislation that affects the English .
2. An English Parliament is required to overcome a democratic deficit .
3. They were passed only because Scottish MPs voted with the government , even though the Scottish Parliament had already voted not to introduce them for Scottish universities .
4. This in fact happened with the vote on university top-up fees : top-up fees were implemented in England despite a majority of English MPs voting against introducing them .
5. This totally undermines the democratic principle of self-rule and according to Paul Kingsworth these policies are , therefore , flawed .
6. Here we have a clear example of the representatives of English citizens voting down a proposal , but the policy being implemented on the English -LRB- against their will -RRB- because of the votes of outsiders .
7. Democracy exists so that a population can decide for itself what laws it lives under the absence of an English Parliament denies the English this right to decide for themselves , because sometimes the Scots and Welsh decide for them .
8. The policies were not , in many cases , representative of the public 's wishes in the geographical area they were to be implemented .
9. accessed 28 August 2011 accessed 27 June 2011 .
Claim:
Without devolution the English are underrepresented.