The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the no-need strategy, otherwise output No. no-need is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used when a participant points out that they do not need an item based on personal context such as suggesting that they have ample water to spare. no-need can directly benefit the opponent since it implies that the item is up for grabs.
--------
Question: Context: 'Thank you very much. I am anemic so it helps to have all the firewood to keep warm.🙂' 'OK NO MENTION AND WHY YOU WANT FOOD' 'I tend to eat more food when I am active outside. I drink more water too because I don't want to get dehydrated.'
Utterance: 'OH OK '

Answer: No


Question: Context: 'I do a lot of hiking mostly, love to take scenic photos. I usually carry food and water supplies?' 'Me too. I am not good at hunting or fishing. So I generally try to take extra food' 'Haha I suck at those activities as well. I don't usually don't eat a lot, so I'm happy to exchange some food supplies for water supplies. '
Utterance: 'I would be willing to do that. What do you propose?'

Answer: No


Question: Context: 'Hello, I am very cold and need food and wood to remain warm. How about I get 3 firewood, 3 food and 1 water?' 'That doesn't really work for me because then I would get only 2 waters and nothing else ☹️. What do you think is your highest priority?' 'Wood is my highest priority. I need it to stay warm. I'm very cold-natured. What is your highest priority? 🙂'
Utterance: 'Oh that's good. Wood is not my highest priority since I get hot easily lol. My highest priority is probably food because I have a very high metabolism and get very hungry'

Answer:
Yes


