Detailed Instructions: Read the given text and if it has abusive content then indicate via "yes". Otherwise indicate via"no". 
We consider the content to be abusive if it contains any of the following instances: (1) Identity Directed Abuse (e.g., Content which contains a negative statement made against an identity. An identity is a social category that relates to a fundamental aspect of individuals community, socio-demographics, position or self-representation) (2) Affiliation Directed Abuse (e.g., Content which express negativity against an affiliation. We define affiliation as a (more or less) voluntary association with a collective. Affiliations include but are not limited to: memberships (e.g. Trade unions), party memberships (e.g. Republicans), political affiliations (e.g. Right-wing people) and occupations (e.g. Doctors).) (3) Person Directed Abuse (e.g., Content which directs negativity against an identifiable person, who is either part of the conversation thread or is named. Person-directed abuse includes serious character based attacks, such as accusing the person of lying, as well as aggression, insults and menacing language.) and (4) Counter Speech (e.g., Content which challenges, condemns or calls out the abusive language of others.). Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].
Q: >#The fury of 'white people' with Jon Snow shows a total lack of self-awareness on race    Yes, because we all know *nobody* would've been offended if someone said "I've never seen so many black/Indian/Pakistani people in one place!"    >It's telling that Snow's remark has sparked more outrage than the fact that a rally held in a city with 40% black and minority-ethnic population was almost entirely white.     In a *country* that's 90% white.     I also like how your link to [the Tommy Robinson *Metro* article shows an Asian supporter(?) right behind him]
A:
no