Title: Faux Fourth Way - caveat emptor Review: This book is a prime example of a genre charitably referred to as "Faux Fourth Way".The "Secret Talks" are the product of E.J. Gold, aka "Mr. G"., a person who never had any connection with any major pupil of Gurdjieff but has styled himself similarly, as one can note from the book's cover photo. Caveat emptor: Style is not substance.The teaching brought to the West by Gurdjieff has a living, continuing transmission ongoing. This book is not representative of that.Amazon does not have a Zero Star rating - this book exemplifies the need for such a rating. Does this product review convey a negative or positive sentiment?
Negative

Title: A Great Unknown Classic of the late '50s Early '60s Review: The mass market paperback is expanded from a short story published in one of the SF magazines published in the 1960's.Written before the fuel crisis, global warming, and with gas cheap and plentiful. Raphael presents a world that can never be, with car flying down the road, air cushioned, at 600 miles an hour.The men are handsome and crewcut in coveralls, traveling down the super highway in a tank of a vehicle as big as an eighteen wheeler. The women are doctors, riding in the back of the vehicle, ready to jump to the assistance of a civilian in need.In many ways this is a perfect example of SF from the late 1950's early 1960's.This novel is well worth your time and effort to find and read. Does this product review convey a negative or positive sentiment?
Positive

Title: Breaking Tradition Review: HELLO? Does anyone out there see that we are breaking the well kept tradition of Hedwig's Theme? I am a creature of habit, and although I don't mind a little change, this is just too much. We are losing a precious thing here! I was upset enough when I heard that the director had done away with the full uniforms, but when I heard that awful knight bus track, I nearly fainted! And what is that thing that looks like a decomposing pig in the front of the bus? And that "double trouble" song is one of the weirdest things I've ever heard! Anyway, I think it's stupid to change the soundtrack so much, and people writing these other reviews must have had something injected into their brains while they were sleeping to have given it five stars. Does this product review convey a negative or positive sentiment?

Negative