TASK DEFINITION: We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Death Penalty)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.
PROBLEM: Sent1: Those are the only relevant ones, seeing as my argument is that the death penalty should be changed to life imprisonment.
 Sent2: Arguments that support the death penalty are the only ones that can reference the Constitution.

SOLUTION: Not similar

PROBLEM: Sent1: What is the REASON behind "an eye for an eye" justice?
 Sent2: An eye for an eye won't make the whole world blind if the person never took the eye in the first place.

SOLUTION: Similar

PROBLEM: Sent1: The person having been convicted of a crime punishable by death and subsequently sentenced to death should be put to death.
 Sent2: No, if it is already known that this person made the crime, the death penalty may be used.

SOLUTION:
Similar

