TASK DEFINITION: The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the other-need strategy, otherwise output No. other-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used when the participants discuss a need for someone else rather than themselves. For instance, describing the need for firewood to keep the kids warm.
PROBLEM: Context: 'no that won't work.  I will give you 3 food and 1 water.  I will take 3 wood and 2 waters.' 'I did not know you wanted water. Ok, that's great so I will take all 3 extra packages of food.As for the water I would like 2 waters because my dog is coming along with us for our trip and extra water for him will be needed.' 'i think i should have 2 waters because i will need to put the fire out to protect the forest.'
Utterance: 'Well, if we can't settle on an agreement i'm going to walk away. We agreed I will get all 3 extra packages of the food but I still wish for the 2 extra wood and 2 extra waters'

SOLUTION: No

PROBLEM: Context: 'Kindly understand our need as we are struggling with hunger now.' 'At the same from my side. We need foods because my child is hunger' 'We with our kids undergone fasting in the recent days, so we are hungry to the peak'
Utterance: 'What did you expect from me? Because same position is here also'

SOLUTION: Yes

PROBLEM: Context: 'Since I'm most interested in firewood, I would want 3 waters if you're going to get more firewood.' 'Nice. That's okay with me. You get 3 waters and a I get 3 firewood' 'I was actually saying you get 2 firewood and I get 3 waters. Then you could have 2 food and I get 1 food.'
Utterance: 'That's seems fair to me since we all need food to eat'

SOLUTION:
No

