We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gay Marriage) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gay marriage. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gay marriage.

And, going back to the general topic of this thread; even if homosexuality is completely genetic and unchangable it doesn't follow that we should recognize a homosexual marriage as deserving of equal priviledge as a heterosexual one.
Valid

Regardless, doing the math, it appears that there are far, far more homosexuals speaking out against AIDS than there are who have AIDS.
Invalid

Saying the federal government has rights over the state government on most matters is not something that should happen.

Invalid

