Given a post that is a real-life anecdote of a complex ethical situation and a question asks if AUTHOR, NOBODY, EVERYBODY, or OTHER is wrong in the situation. Answer the question and classify your answers into yes or no.

Is OTHER wrong in the post ? POST : Before you read, if you are currently watching the Dororo anime and don't want it spoiled like I was do not proceed!

&amp;#x200B;

So basically I made a meme on the r/Dororo subreddit that gained a bit of attention, in the comments someone decided to post a spoiler but apparently they only suggested it could happen. The conversation goes like this:  


 P1: Regained depression after realizing what Mio did for a living :,( 

Me:  Yeah IKR, it started so cute with the bow scene and just descended! 

SP:   And throw salt on it when she gets killed 

Me:  I tagged this as a spoiler for episode five, not the manga. I hope you realise how mad I am that you decided to take a spoiler from the manga to an anime post. Please be more considerate in the future. 

SP:  I did not spoil anything. What I said was up for speculation as I did not confirm anything. You, on the other hand, just confirmed it yourself. Therefore, YOU are the one who just spoiled it. 

&amp;#x200B;

If you want to see this yourself please navigate through my profile as I don't like promoting my posts on other subreddits. Who really is the spoiler here though? I have never read the manga and didn't know she died until I read his comment, but was I supposed to infer he wasn't confirming it?  
   

yes