Given the task definition, example input & output, solve the new input case.
The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the no-need strategy, otherwise output No. no-need is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used when a participant points out that they do not need an item based on personal context such as suggesting that they have ample water to spare. no-need can directly benefit the opponent since it implies that the item is up for grabs.
Example: Context: 
Utterance: 'how about I give you 2 waters and 1 food package in exchange for all your firewood?'
Output: No
The utterance does not use the no-need strategy since it never refers to an item that the participant does not need.

New input case for you: Context: 'Hi, 🙂 It's nice to meet you as well: I also hope we can work something out: Food is my excess trip priority, What is yours?' 'Mine is firewood with second being food.' 'I'm definitely willing to give up some food for some firewood: That seems like a place where we can come to an arrangement: Would you like to make an opening offer? '
Utterance: 'Sure!  I figure I can go with little water as we can get it from the stream and boil it.  So for water I would be willing to give you 2 packages.  Would that be fair?'
Output:
Yes