In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: identity-attack and non-identity-attack. Identity attack refers to anything rude or disrespectful about someone's identity, including appearance, race, gender, and sexual orientation.

Example Input: Comment: Obama’s mother did not work at BOH. You lied.
Example Output: Non-identity-attack

Example Input: Comment: you clearly are stupid to note your own lobby document.
Example Output: Non-identity-attack

Example Input: Comment: Petting is an old (mid-20th century) term that means stimulating another person's sex organs or breasts – usually with your hand or mouth, and normally while kissing them"   Here's a Wikipedia definition.  Here's another from National Crime Victims Association "Sexual Abuse: A general term used to describe the infliction of some sort of sexual activity upon a person who has not given consent or is incapable of giving such consent. This can be used to refer to sexual abuse of persons who are differently-abled, a child, or an elder person. "  So "petting" may constitute criminal sex abuse under certain circumstances...although the story doesn't reference "petting"; it refers to "touching her genitals" ....which, under the circumsances of "non-consensual", would likely qualify as sexual abuse...obviously, the police and DA's office determined the incident qualified....from this point, it's up to the court system
Example Output:
Non-identity-attack

