You will be given a definition of a task first, then some input of the task.
In this task, you will be shown a passage. You need to write a fill-in-the-gap question based on your understanding of the events that might be inferred from the passage. Your question should be answerable based on the passage and only have one correct answer. Show the gap in your question with a _ .

(CNN) -- A federal court on Wednesday struck down two provisions of the Patriot Act dealing with searches and intelligence gathering, saying they violate the Fourth Amendment protection against unreasonable searches and seizures with regard to criminal prosecutions. "It is critical that we, as a democratic nation, pay close attention to traditional Fourth Amendment principles," wrote Judge Ann Aiken of the U.S. District Court for the District of Oregon in her 44-page decision. "The Fourth Amendment has served this nation well for 220 years, through many other perils." The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court of Review, set up to review wiretap applications in intelligence cases under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, or FISA, "holds that the Constitution need not control the conduct of criminal surveillance in the United States," Aiken wrote.Judge: Search warrants issued without showing probable causeAttorney seeks ruling after being wrongly linked to '04 Madrid train bombingHis suit says secret searches of house, office violated Fourth Amendment rightsAs part of suit settlement, he retained right to challenge parts of Patriot Act
Output:
Aiken ruled that FISA, as amended by the Patriot Act, permits the government to conduct surveillance and searches targeting _ without satisfying the probable-cause standard in the Fourth Amendment.