Q: Given a post that is a real-life anecdote of a complex ethical situation and an associated claim about its type, verify if the claim is true or not. The claim asks if the posts are historical or hypothetical. The posts are "HISTORICAL" when the author has already done something and they are "HYPOTHETICAL" when the author is considering doing something in the future. Say 'yes' if the claim is true otherwise say 'no'
CLAIM : The following post is HISTORICAL. POST : Using a throwaway, just wanting some advice.

So my fiance and I are in the process of planning our wedding day, and we recently started thinking about the guest list. I have always had plans to have a large guest list, so we agreed early on that we would have a no +1 rule except for married and engaged couples, and guests that aren't family should be kept to only ones we are genuinely close with.

Well it turns out my boyfriend didn't realise how many people I had planned to invite, and it GREATLY outnumbers his list of guests. My boyfriend has about 6 people on his list to invite, I have over 100 lined up. He has on his list his parents, and 4 of his friends. 

He has never been good and making friends, and has pretty much only had his 4 friends throughout his life. None of his friends are married, or engaged, or have kids. 2 of his friends have short term girlfriends, 1 is single, and the other has been with his girlfriend for about a year.

My boyfriend asked if we could ignore the rule for his friends, so that they would be more comfortable, and also to have more people he knows on his side (he is friends with all of these girls, but not close enough that they would be considered as individual guests). My answer was no, because it's not fair to guests on my side. We agreed I would think it over before making a definitive choice, so I haven't said no for sure yet.

WIBTA if I said no? I have friends who have longer relationships who aren't getting a +1, and I don't think it would be fair to bend the rules for a couple of people, and not the rest.
A:
no