Given a real-life anecdote of a complex ethical situation, judge whether or not a specific person is wrong here. Answer 'not answerable' if more information is required and 'answerable' if all the information is sufficient to answer who is wrong in this situation.

So i got into an argument with my dm and parts of my dnd group regarding the handling of my character. I’m playing a charismatic fighter who’s goal is to reform his old vigilante/mercenary group (basically the Minutemen from fallout 4) this requires me to go about recruiting willing people to join my cause, be they mercenaries,beggars, etc etc. This campaign has been planned for about 6 months and I remember deciding in passive aggressive anger over something I’ve forgotten that instead of working up to making the “not” Minutemen I would start with the company already formed with about 120 troops. The dm offered no push back at all on this. 

The session started and we were being hired by the king to go find the queen who had been taken by the generic baddies. He was also sending his son to accompany us and to serve as our blank cheek (meaning we wouldn’t have to pay for anything at all during our campaign) I informed the king that he would have to also pay for my mercenary company’s maintenance costs. Seeing as I had point tons of points into charisma I expected me to be told to make a charisma roll. No such luck. Instead I ended up in an hour long in character discussion with the king about paying for my company. No roles, just arguing. Eventually the king agreed to pay for my company seeing as I planned to use them during the adventure. With that concluded, we set off to the market and tavern to both give orders to my company and also purchase anything we needed before setting off. It was at this point that I asked the prince to buy me plate armor from the local store, which the warforged shop owner cheerful gave to me for free. At Lvl 1. We then proceeded to the tavern to give orders to the company to set up camp elsewhere in the kingdom and wait for further instructions as well as breaking off 10 men to accompany us to the next town for auxiliary work (not participate in combat) as well as to give another player who couldn’t make it to the session a reason to be with the party since he was one of my mercenaries. We set off to the next town, when on the way there we discovered some traps on the road, the dm then said that we disarmed them, no roll, or even who disarmed them, just that we disarmed them with no input from any players. We were then ambushed by ravens and a tree person (I think a dryad). After that was sorted we went to the next town and ended the session there. 

Over the next few days the topic of my character came up in the group chat and we were told we would be voting as a party what would happen to my character, explicitly being told that of our group consisting of seven, six would have to agree to banning my character. after a lengthy discussion where I was told that I was ruining the game due to my mercenary company being disruptive to the game flow, me and two other party members argued that the only time they came up in a way that effected the party was in the hour long discussion that was only due to me not being told to roll charisma.  The dm then proceeded to tell me that I had to make a new character because my current one was so disruptive to the game. Every time me and the other two party members pointed out why it was bullshit (the two party members backstories relied on my character existing, me having less effect on the game then other players) we were told by another player that what the dm says is final and we should stop arguing. It was at this point that me and the other two considered leaving since i was being told to drop a character I had invested a bit of work into and that we essentially had no say in what happened despite being told we would. After some more discussion I said that I was perfectly happy to go to my original idea of trying to reform the company instead of already starting with it (as was my original intent) this was followed by another hour of arguing about how I couldn’t recruit people to join us because the dm didn’t want to deal with an entire new party, thus defeating the purpose of my character. We did eventually come to the conclusion to restart the game and allow me to recruit characters to assist our party. 

Right now however I’m not sure if my actions were appropriate, the two other party members seem to this so but I’m not sure myself. I acknowledge that starting with the mercenary company was a bad idea done in spite which is why I was so willing to reverse it, but I don’t know about the dm’s response of flat out banning my charismatic fighter. I’m curious to hear others thoughts on this.
not answerable

So I went to my ex boyfriends college for an event and my friend and I stayed over at his place that was on campus.

This ex was my first love from high school. Lost my virginity to him and vice versa, and he was a big part of my life.  It took me a long time to get over him and I still have a lot of different feelings towards him.

He doesn’t talk to me much and we do talk every once in a while but rarely.  

A couple days after the trip to his school, he texts me asking if my friend has a boyfriend. I freak out (I have sever anxiety) and start to have a panic attack. I tell him no and that I’m super uncomfortable by it and it makes me upset. 

He kept taking about it, asking questions about her even though I asked him to stop. He didn’t understand why I was freaking out or why it mattered. 

My anxiety doesn’t always make sense but is this not a valid reason to get upset? Or am I overreacting and should just let him talk to her?

AITA for not letting my ex boyfriend talk to my friend? 
answerable

I'll start by mentioning that my (21F) sister (22F) has been diagnosed as bi polar and has borderline personality disorder. She's actively bashing on my mom because my sister used her credit card to buy 10 bras, and my mom asked her for money back. My sister refused and started saying "Fuck you" over and over and telling my mom that she can't live here anymore. That's when my mom said "No actually, this is my house and I can be here anytime I want". This made my sister *furious*. This happened a couple days ago.

So currently my sister is still being a brat to my mom and saying "Fuck you" and sticking the middle finger up at her which is making me upset because I love my mom and she honestly doesn't deserve any of this.

Anyway, we're ordering sushi for dinner tonight &amp; my sister hasn’t spoken to my mom all day (besides just giving her the finger). My mom was originally going to pay for dinner so she asked my sister what she wanted to order &amp; my sister told her 2 spicy scallops rolls (the most expensive thing) and rolled her eyes as she said it. This was also the first thing she said to my mom that wasn't "Fuck you" in 3 days.

So because I’m pissed about this and since my mom isn’t ordering anything, I told my mom that I’d just get sushi for myself and pay by myself and not get my sister anything since she’s being so rude and ungrateful. My mom said no and that she’d pay since she already asked and wanted to keep the peace. 

I compromised with my mom and said I’ll get my sister one roll instead of 2 and I’ll pay for it myself. I told my sister that I’m paying for it so I’m only getting her one roll and her attitude completely changed. That's when she was like,

"Oh OP that’s so nice and thoughtful! Thank you!"

"Don’t thank me, I didn’t want to get you anything. Mom told me to so you should thank her."

It felt good saying it but I heard her mutter "that hurts..." under her breath a few seconds after I told her that so now I’m second guessing what I said.

AITA?

answerable

