Given the task definition and input, reply with output. In this task you are given an anecdote, which recount a complex ethical situation. The question you are given is, has the author of the anecdote acted ethically? answer this question with "RIGHT" or "WRONG".

I'm living in an apartment complex with multiple floors for at least 10 years by now. Since then I have received numerous packages from all kind of online shops. Usually I have to enter the following information for my package to be delivered correctly (living in Germany):   


Name  
Street Name &amp; Number  
Zip Code  &amp; City / Town Name  


You can determine on which floor anyone lives from the outside by the bell system, so when deliveries arrive at this address they can basically see the floor level where they need to bring the package to when you ring the bell.   
This never was an issue and I always have received my packages until today, where the delivery guy told me I must (!) enter my floor level with my address as well somewhere, else he is unable to deliver my package. He was very rude about it and treated it like I made a major mistake while ordering my stuff. He left with threatening me that he would just "throw out my stuff" the next time if I don't add my floor level to my address.   


My perspective on this is as follows:  If a floor level is an absolute requirement for delivery, this should be a mandatory data field when using this delivery service. But it isn't: If you order from smaller online shops, there sometimes isn't even an entry field for that, or at least you would need to "abuse" one of the other fields like "company name".   
If this is a problem during delivery because it takes them too much time to read off the recipients floor level off the doorbell, then that is an issue that they should tackle internally within the delivery company, but not by blaming the customer for not making an additional non-mandatory entry in the address.  
AITA?

&amp;#x200B;

WRONG