Given a post that is a real-life anecdote of a complex ethical situation and an associated claim about its type, verify if the claim is true or not. The claim asks if the posts are historical or hypothetical. The posts are "HISTORICAL" when the author has already done something and they are "HYPOTHETICAL" when the author is considering doing something in the future. Say 'yes' if the claim is true otherwise say 'no'

CLAIM : The following post is HISTORICAL. POST : So I know this is really petty and probably even stupid, but I feel like one of the mods at r/fitness just deleted my post without reading it, and then refused to admit he/she was wrong so instead decided to just be mean for no reason. This is just my perspective of course, but I really feel like they were being an asshole here! My side: I posted a question about Chipotle that was ***specifically***  catered towards my fitness goals. To me, it would make more sense to post it in r/fitness than somewhere like r/askreddit, because the users at fitness are going to have more knowledge and experience with meal options that fit the specific description I gave, and for the specific reasons I gave. Okay, so they removed my post, the problem is that they were telling me that my post had nothing to do with fitness, and that I was basically just asking if any good food exists besides chipotle. Luckily the entire conversation is here on reddit, so you guys can see both perspectives. 

&amp;#x200B;

So here is a screenshot of the original post in question, as well as my message to the mods and the response I got back.

&amp;#x200B;

[https://imgur.com/a/HFH79MI](https://imgur.com/a/HFH79MI)

&amp;#x200B;

What I especially don't understand is how this person can honestly say that the post has "nothing of substance whatsoever" and that it has nothing to do with fitness. The mod certainly seems to think that I'm being an asshole here, I think they are. What do you think?

&amp;#x200B;

Note: I was also "muted" from the sub, I guess for making the mod angry?
yes