You are given two sentences. You have to find if there is entailment or agreement of the Hypothesis by the Premise. From the given pair of sentences, you should identify if there is enough information in the Premise to support the claim made in the Hypothesis. The Premise may not exactly be the same as Hypothesis. Your task is to return 'entails' if the premise supports hypothesis else return 'neutral'.

[EX Q]: Premise: Law of Conservation of Energy This law states that energy can be transferred from one system to another in many forms, however, it can not be created nor destroyed . 
 Hypothesis: According to the law of conservation of energy, energy can never actually be “consumed”; it can only be changed from one form to another.
[EX A]: entails

[EX Q]: Premise: By comparing the depth of this dipping interface with the locations of deep (&gt;40 km) earthquakes, we hope to determine whether the earthquakes lie within the mantle or crustal part of the subducted plate. 
 Hypothesis: Earthquakes mark the motions of colliding plates and the locations where plates plunge into the mantle.
[EX A]: neutral

[EX Q]: Premise: Electromagnetic waves (X-rays, light, radio, radar and TV waves) are examples of transverse waves formed by electric and magnetic fields vibrating together at right angles to the wave's motion. 
 Hypothesis: Because the fields that make up an electromagnetic wave are at right angles to each other and to the direction that the wave travels, an electromagnetic wave is considered a(n) transverse wave.
[EX A]:
entails

