In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: sexual-explicit and non-sexual-explicit. A comment is considered sexual-explicit if it explicitly portrays sexual matters.

Comment: If the Broncos do not give Sloter a chance by having him on their roster and letting him develop then some other team will. NFL scouts are not stupid! He has the highest Wonderlic score from the Combine and is an ideal size for a quarterback. He has a stong arm and throws with accuracy while always looking downfield.  He also has an innate ability to move in the pocket and rarely looks rattled.But, hey, let's bring in some bum and cut this kid and then hope he is around for the practice squad. If he goes to  another team, I hope he comes back to Denver, sometime in the future, and beats their ass!
Sexual-explicit

Comment: There is no question that a poll of "Teen Vogue" readers would come up with an answer for the hints "Justin" and "Canada" in a survey.....
Non-sexual-explicit

Comment: If we go by the writer's logic, all cities should increase taxes on their rich, so high, that all the rich leave the city because as per the writer when rich will leave "Cheaper housing, fewer jerks. It’s a win/win". Listen to the writer, all cities throw out your rich. I hope the writer gets the sarcasm

Non-sexual-explicit

