We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

Australia, for example, hasn't had one single mass shooting since it passed stricter gun laws over ten years ago.
Valid

Is it the lasting bloodline of a nation of frontiersmen, born from armed struggle against an empire?
Valid

Then why do nations which ban guns have a much lower gun crime rate than the US?

Valid

