Given a post that is a real-life anecdote of a complex ethical situation and a question asks if AUTHOR, NOBODY, EVERYBODY, or OTHER is wrong in the situation. Answer the question and classify your answers into yes or no.

Is AUTHOR wrong in the post ? POST : In my now former D&amp;D group i brought a warforged hexblade warlock/sorceror. whole the core of this build using a synergy between those two classes to generate magic with no upper limit the DM signed off on that part of the build beforehand. the thing that made him upset is the fact that with the warforged's natural armor and the haste spell i had an extremely high AC for a spellcasting class and could preform a melee spell for more damage than the barbarian. this part didn't come from any synergy and was just natural aspects of the hexblade warlock class and the warforged. as soon as he saw how strong this was he ended the session mid-combat then kicked me from the online chatroom. my gameplay was in no way disruptive i was just entirely too strong for the DMs plans.
no