Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.

With so many bad attitudes toward smaller oil companies regurgitating false talking points it is no wonder Alaska's oil production has dropped from over 2 million to 500,000 on the North Slope and oil also had a massive decline fron 270,000 barrels per day to 15,000 in the Cook Inlet. 

Keep up the insults and harsh attitudes and see what that gets! 

Soon no one will produce enough because of poor treatment like this attack on Hilcorp by the AOGCC and people like Estun!
No

Glad you asked. Put all of the State of Alaska's revenue into the Permanent Fund which would raise the fund to around $70 billion. Then pay the state 4% of the fund balance every year to be used for their operating and capital expenses. In years when the fund produces more than 6% in earnings, pay the excess earnings out to the public in the form of a dividend. Under the plan, this year the State would get approximately $2.8 billion. Of course that is short of what they want but it is sustainable into perpetuity. Continuing to build to the Permanent Fund is the Future of Alaska. We accept pain now, for the benefit of a brighter future!
No

Kivalina is built in a stupid place. So why is this everyone problem? What does it contribute to the state? What infrastructure there is worth saving? The oil money has run out so all of these seasonal hunting camps that people decided to settle in permanently can no longer be subsidized. Nobody in their right mind would buy one of the "houses" there so the real estate market is a bust. Nobody is going to put any money into a business so again, what does Kivalina contribute to the state? The best thing that could happen would be for the Feds to condemn the village, demolish it and let the island return back to nature. The residents could be given X amount of dollars to relocate wherever they choose.

Yes

