In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: disagree or agree. Classify the comment as disagree if it is likely to raise a certain level of public disagreement, whether healthy or unhealthy. The disagreement can be due to toxic content (for example, disrespect, identity attack, insult, and threat), controversial content, misunderstandings, or conflicting opinions. Classify the comment as agree otherwise.

[EX Q]: Comment: Furlong did lie. Let's not forget that. At first he denied being in BC during an earlier stint in Burns Lake, then he admitted it, downplaying the commission of almost 2 years of his life and his original start in Canada. While that doesn't mean he hid something, it does bring up the matter of deception and convenient forgetfulness.

That si why he has zero claim for libel or wrongful dismissal.

So let him get on with his life, but not as a trusted public speaker or figure. His showboating style (Evermet him? Lots of self-promotion in his personality) is something he paid a price for.
[EX A]: Disagree

[EX Q]: Comment: Agreed. I'll never understand the notion that somehow all ideas are equal, and should be given equal treatment.
[EX A]: Agree

[EX Q]: Comment: I'm shocked!  Shocked, I tell you!  Don Young embroiled in yet another ethics problem.  Who could have seen this coming?
[EX A]:
Agree

