Arguments: 1. Businesses based in these cities will be much more likely to invest in Britain with direct flights .
2. BBC News , New group backs Heathrow expansion , 21 July 2003 , Duncan , E. , Wake up .
3. Added to this many hundreds of thousands more are dependent upon the tourist trade in London which relies on good transport links like Heathrow .
4. Loosing competitiveness in front of other European airports not only could imply wasting the possibility to create new jobs , but lose some of those that already exist .
5. Expanding Heathrow would ensure many current jobs as well as creating new ones .
6. Currently , Heathrow supports around 250,000 jobs .
7. This is because aviation infrastructure is important for identifying new business opportunities .
8. The UKs economic future depends on trading not just with traditional destinations in Europe and America but also with the expanding cities of China and India , cities such as Chongqing and Chengdu .
9. Expansion of Heathrow would also be building a vital part of infrastructure at a time when British infrastructure spending is very low as a result of the recession so helping to boost growth .
10. Good flight connections are critical for attracting new business and maintaining current business .

Debate: This House would build a third Heathrow runway to maintain its position as a hub airport


Arguments: 1. Furthermore , many experts agree that so-called micro-renewables will play an increasingly important role in the energy future of the planet and wind energy is the example par excellence of how this can be done ; the most basic homemade windmill can power a generator and wind power predates electricity offshore and on by centuries .
2. In addition to which farms can be built incrementally ; a half completed wind farm is simply one that is half its original size for virtually any other form of power generation its an all or nothing proposition .
3. The installation costs of an entire wind farm are , admittedly , fairly high although they pale into insignificance compared to an oil station or a nuclear plant but after that there is almost no associated cost whatsoever .

Debate: This House Belives that wind power should be a primary focus of future energy supply.


Arguments: 1. This is a market for American products as well as a local producer .
2. Even the modest opening of the embargo in 2000 has increased sales of farm products immensely having gone from nothing to $ 344 million in 2010 .
3. Mid-Western Republicans have all voted to drop the embargo because of the potential for profits in their farming states .
4. The United States will also benefit from the opening of trade with Cuba economically .
5. Further , if sanctions end Americans will be able to stop pretending that they prefer Bolivian cigars !

Debate:
This House would drop the sanctions against Cuba.