Given a real-life anecdote of a complex ethical situation, identify who is wrong here. Classify each post into the following categories : AUTHOR (if the author of the post is wrong in the situation), OTHER (if any of the others mentioned in the paragraph is wrong), EVERYBODY (if everyone mentioned is wrong) and NOBODY (if no one is wrong in the situation).

Example input: Pretty much was hanging out with two friends. I was watching the Lakers game. They won at the very last minute and I immediately hopped up and celebrated. Before I could even finish celebrating one friend started going on about how the Lakers suck. It just pissed me off so much I screamed at her to get out my room until she left. 


She knows I'm a huge fan and she likes them too. She was only saying it to antagonize me. Am I the dick here?
Example output: AUTHOR
Example explanation: It is very rude to shout at someone and ask her to leave the room even if her comments may have antagonized the author. Hence author is at fault here.
Q: Sorry for any bad grammar mistakes or anything, I'm a student who is kinda bad at it anyway. For extra this happened around my second year in this high school and I tend to keep my feelings bottled up until something forces me to release them and sometimes its in physical ways and other times its the silent treatment.

So a year or two ago I hanged out (and still do) with a group of roughly 9 people at school. We would sometimes argue as I am quite hot headed so naturally when I repeatedly told them to leave me alone after an argument I got annoyed when they began following me. However, I got really pissed when this one girl, who I'll call Momo, made a smug face at me. I really hate smug faces so I punched her. 

So am I the asshole for punching her when she was getting on my nerves? 


A:
AUTHOR