Argument:1. Because , deep down , everyone knows that it is simply a balancing of risks in practice all the government is trying to do is save lives .
2. It would be incredibly disingenuous of the opposition if they did not concede that the dangers are great and that something must be done .
3. These liberties will of course still be completely protected by the courts .
4. It is of course , the governments primary duty to protect citizens but this can only be done with the loss of some civil liberties .
5. When it comes to the issue of life and death , it is the propositions hope that a few civil liberties would be only willingly given up by any prudent citizen .
Claim: The argument is about practicality and the balancing of risks.


Sentences: 1. A recent advertisement for make-up was banned in Britain due to the company presenting its product as being more effective than it actually was .
2. The claims of adverts crowd in on people , raising expectations about a product and leading to inevitable disappointment after it is bought .
3. Recent research suggests that people are on average less happy than they were 30 years ago - despite being better off and having much more choice of things to spend their money on .
4. Advertising leads to many people being overwhelmed by the endless need to decide between competing demands on their attention this is known as the tyranny of choice or choice overload .
5. Schwartz , The Tyranny of Choice , 2004 .
6. Some people are so overwhelmed that they can not choose at all .
7. Shoppers feel that a poor purchase is their fault for not choosing more wisely , and regret not choosing something else instead .
What claim can be made from these sentences?
People are given too much choice, which makes them less happy.


This House believes community radio is good for democracy
Claim: Radio is cheap to produce and easily accessible.


Question:
Summarize the argument implied by these sentences. 1. For example , while descendants of the Sioux Indians of the American Midwest may no longer hunt buffalo , learning about traditional means of hunting , animal use , rituals involving the surrounding wildlife , means of ensuring a sustainable food supply , and other cultural norms related to the land gives people a greater appreciation for the land they now inhabit .
2. Across the United States , Australia , and Canada , native customs are often tied closely to the land .
3. This does not just benefit the direct descendants of those practicing these traditions but the whole of society .
4. Exposure to traditions that have been practiced in one 's land for thousands of years helps us to appreciate the legacy we have inherited .
Answer:
All of society benefits from protection of indigenous culture


Question: What claim can be made from the following pieces of evidence?
1. As Saadi Touval argued The borders are blamed for the disappearance of a unity which supposed existed in Africa in precolonial times The borders are considered to be one of the humiliating legacies of colonialism , which , according to this view , independent Africa ought to abolish .
2. Qaddafi argued that peace will break out when Africas borders disappear .
3. In the post-colonial period , borders were drawn between states randomly , creating ethnic tension and geographic dissonance .
4. For some commentators , Africas biggest problem is that its countries are remnants of colonial empires .
5. The EU was established after WWII to assist in the rebuilding of Europe ; why cant the AU do the same in Africa ?
6. Most importantly , the AU has abandoned the notion of absolute `` state sovereignty '' : it can `` peer review '' the human rights and political situation in any of its members .
7. Though unification is the end goal , the short-term objective is to create an African free trade area with some semblance of regional organization .

Claim: Integration will fix the problem of borders


This House believes that government does more for liberty than the market does
Claim:
Government is, at least in theory, transparent and open to public criticism, corporations by their nature are secretive