Argument:1. Studies on the ban of advertisements show that bans actually contribute great amounts to the reduction of smokers .
2. `` The tobacco industry employs predatory marketing strategies to get young people hooked to their addictive drug , '' said Dr Douglas Bettcher , Director of WHO 's Tobacco Free Initiative .
3. A ban or high restrictions is a good measure to diminish the effects of smoking in society , because unlike the spreading of information -LRB- which is usually done by schools / clubs -RRB- , governmental restrictions or a total ban will ensure the access of measures to the whole population .
4. Through a ban on advertisement or higher taxation those citizens not involved in active educational structures get educated about the problem .
5. `` But comprehensive advertising bans do work , reducing tobacco consumption by up to 16 % in countries that have already taken this legislative step . ''
6. So because these measures can drastically decrease smoking when other measures have failed , the state is right to impose bans on advertisement , higher prices or any other measures .
Claim: Restrictions reach out to the general population


Sentences: 1. Local pressure can be brought upon school boards and school districts from the constituency they serve .
2. When the decision makers controlling education are from the local community , more accountability is possible .
3. Since students educational needs are of importance to families in a local community , those citizens have the right and responsibility to seek accountability from their local school districts .
What claim can be made from these sentences?
Local control provides more accountability in the educational system


This House believes forced evictions are necessary for African cities to become global players.
Claim: Forced evictions will create cities without slums in the long-run.


Question:
Summarize the argument implied by these sentences. 1. In many cases it may be impossible to prove that the person claiming asylum is even from the country that they claim to be from .
2. It is extremely difficult to tell if someone is a genuine asylum seeker or not ; for obvious reasons many will have little or no documentation , and all the evidence that they have suffered persecution may be in a faraway country and impossible to obtain .
3. Asylum decisions are therefore based largely on a judgement call by the investigating officer on whether they thing the person in front of them is being truthful or not that leaves the system open to motivated people who are economic migrants or may even pose a security threat .
Answer:
The system is open to abuse


Question: What claim can be made from the following pieces of evidence?
1. Underemployment is considered to be even higher , though precise figures are by their very nature impossible to acquire .
2. According to the CIA World Factbook , non-industrialised countries have an average of 30 % unemployment and industrialised nations have somewhere between 4-12 % unemployment .
3. With no option but to hire more staff , businesses will have no choice but to hire the currently out of work to fulfil their labour requirements .
4. By capping the working hours of those in employment , the unemployed stand an increased chance of entering the workforce .
5. In industrialised countries the unemployed are already being paid via taxes , with this change there can be at least some productivity from them .
6. This is economically beneficial , as the costs of long term unemployment to an economy are enormous .

Claim: There should be a legally mandated ceiling on weekly working hours, because it creates employment.


Sentences: 1. This is harmful as it is likely in the long term to further reduce the number of marriages , leading to fewer stable relationships .
2. Giving legal rights to cohabiting couples endorses more diverse relationships , suggesting that marriage is less important .
3. The societal shift away from marriage is harmful .
4. Property rights for unmarried couples undermine marriage as an institution , harming society .
5. Because of the higher exit costs -LRB- divorce is difficult and time-consuming -RRB- , married couples are more likely to resolve their problems than cohabiting couples who can walk away more easily .
6. Marriages tend to be more stable than cohabitation because of the greater level of commitment involved : the mutual support of a marriage is beneficial for individuals and can create a more secure environment for raising children .
What claim can be made from these sentences?

Property rights for cohabiting couples will undermine the institution of marriage