In this task, you are given books product reviews in English language. The goal is to classify the review as "POS" if the overall sentiment of the review is positive or as "NEG" if the overall sentiment of the review is negative.
One example is below.
Q: Hopeful for those who seek harmony in the world . I wouldn't recommend this to anyone who thinks that religious wars, repression of individual spirits or rape of the earth are good things. Those who seek peace, harmony, celebration of each of us and respect for  our earth will find this hopeful
A: POS
Rationale: The overall sentiment of the review is positive as the reviewer mentions positive expressions such as 'hopeful', 'will find this helpful' etc.. Hence, the label is 'POS'.
Q: historical truth? . I'm interested by all the reviewers who claim this book is a good one despite the racist stereotypes of "savage" natives because, they say, it's "the truth."  The review before mine is especially interesting; he proclaims to love the book and reads it to his children as it teaches about defending your home against terrorism.  Reviewers like myself are just spewing "liberal diatribe."  Another reviewer asks "as for the savages, who was attacking who?"      Everyone thinks of the scenario of little Edward and his innocent family just living their lives until these terrible Indians come along and want to wipe them out.  In the interest of historical truth, would you look at it another way?    Think of your home and neighborhood.  You may have lived there for years, or you may have just moved from a neighboring town.  You participate in community activities, your children are educated with your neighbors children, you attend religious services.  Then one day, a group of foreign soldiers come into your neighborhood, and say it now belongs to them.  As Americans, how would you feel if a group of Italian, English, Russian, French, etc., soldiers did this?  They claim the neighborhood in the name of their government and demand that you leave your home and go elsewhere.      Pretend no telephones, telegraph, or internet exist.  You go to your government and tell them about the soldiers, but they have no way of notifying the foriegn soldiers government that this land is already settled.  Your government sends an army to eject the soldiers, but is defeated.  Eventually you have to leave.  The soldiers keep coming, and it's not long before families from the soldiers land come as well.  They keep expanding further and further, and forcing you and your family to keep moving, killing many of your family and friends.      Eventually all of you have had enough of this treatment - instead of fighting only their soldiers, your leaders get small citizen's armies together to attack their settlements as they have yours.  Now, who is the terrorist in this case?      If you want your children to know the historical truth, you should tell them the whole truth.  Comparing the original inhabitants of North and South America to the 9-11 terrorists is not accurate.  Comparing the european invaders - let me see, they killed the natives who wanted to keep the land they'd lived on for centuries, and forcibly converted them to european religions, as the native religions were "heathen."      If you believe everything I've written is just "liberal diatribe," go on happily reading this book to your kids, with no true historical references.  I'm just a mixed-blood savage, so of course what I think won't count with you.
A:
NEG