Given a real-life anecdote of a complex ethical situation, judge whether or not a specific person is wrong here. Answer 'not answerable' if more information is required and 'answerable' if all the information is sufficient to answer who is wrong in this situation.

Example input: So on one hand I don't think it's the best thing but at the same time it's led her to talking about how she cut(s) herself and a kid who told her to shoot herself which she wouldn't have talked about otherwise.
Example output: not answerable
Example explanation: Here there is no information about how severe the situation was or what was her reaction after telling this to the author. We also do not know whether she told this on purpose or not. More information is needed to determine who is at fault here.
Q: I'm a student and work part time. I often have homework after school and there are other things for me to do. He works less than 40 hours a week and doesn't go to school and refuses to go by himself. We decide on what we want beforehand so it's not like he doesn't have any ideas. When hes at home he sits and plays games or watches TV. Am I an asshole for saying he can go by himself?
A:
answerable