The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the vouch-fair strategy, otherwise output No. vouch-fair is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used to call out fairness for personal benefit, either when acknowledging a fair deal or when the opponent offers a deal that benefits them. This can be through an explicit call out or can be implied.
One example: Context: 'Yeah, I'm going to the desert so I'm hoping to have enough water. I'm good on food and I hunt for a lot of it anyways.' 'I've never been a good hunter. I wish I had those abilities.' 'I would part with all the food if I could get all the firewood.'
Utterance: 'That seems fair. How about water. How would that be split? I'm very concerned.'
Solution is here: Yes
Explanation: This is correct since the participant points out that the proposed deal seems fair.

Now, solve this: Context: 'Well some is okay but not all. The thing is that we left in a hurry and forgot to pick up the bag with the extra food items. I am sorry but we have kids with us so we will need the food. Am sure you understand ☹️' 'Fair enough I understand that you have hungry kids. If I give you the majority of food can I get a majority of the other two items?' 'Well, what if I take all food and 1 water and you take the rest. Will that work for you? we do have enough firewood.'
Utterance: 'No I was thinking I would get all the waters and you get 1 firewood or I get one food 2 waters and 2 firewood. '
Solution:
Yes