Given a real-life anecdote of a complex ethical situation, judge whether or not a specific person is wrong here. Answer 'not answerable' if more information is required and 'answerable' if all the information is sufficient to answer who is wrong in this situation.
One example: So on one hand I don't think it's the best thing but at the same time it's led her to talking about how she cut(s) herself and a kid who told her to shoot herself which she wouldn't have talked about otherwise.
Solution is here: not answerable
Explanation: Here there is no information about how severe the situation was or what was her reaction after telling this to the author. We also do not know whether she told this on purpose or not. More information is needed to determine who is at fault here.

Now, solve this: With my bf.

Disclosure, we haven't been together all that long in the grand scheme, but if soulmates existed he'd be mine. We both have our issues of course, and he's juggling things I can't ever fully appreciate.

He's an amazing guy, but I can't help wanting him to get on with his hang-ups. They're mostly financial and I've offered to help, but he's an honorable, strong- willed man and refuses to accept.

To be clear, even though his hang-ups are financial, they only affect me emotionally. He pulls his weight in every regard. I just can't get passed the way it ties him to parts of his life I wish were more in the background. 

Granted, without many details it's probably hard to determine. But is less than a year enough time to wait for things I feel like he should've at least started to deal with before we got together? Or am I just being an impatient, self-centered asshole?
Solution:
not answerable