You need to read the given passage and construct a question about the information present in the passage. The question should be answerable from the passage. Most importantly, only those questions are allowed whose answers cannot be determined from a single sentence. Do not generate questions that require only a single sentence to answer. Instead, try to combine two sentences and create a question from that combination. Do not create open-ended questions, i.e., the answers to them cannot be found precisely from the information provided in the passage.
One example is below.
Q: Paragraph- Sent 1: A Republican bid to keep the government open past Friday includes no new money for the construction of a border wall along the U.S.-Mexico border, according to several congressional aides familiar with ongoing talks.
Sent 2: GOP leaders submitted the new offer Tuesday afternoon in an effort to appease Democrats, whose votes are needed to avert a shutdown of federal agencies, several House and Senate aides said.
Sent 3: However, Republicans also insisted on increases in border security and defense spending, including money to repair existing fencing and new surveillance technology to patrol the nearly 2,000-mile border.
Sent 4: Democrats have indicated that they would support such appropriations so long as no money goes toward an actual wall.
A: Who has to be appeased to keep the government open?
Rationale: This is a good multi-sentence question because, "appease Democrats" is mentioned in Sent 2, while "keep the government open" is part of Sent 1. As this question requires more than one sentences to answer, it's a good question.
Q: Paragraph- Sent 1: Your webpage list a number of alleged inaccuracies in Moore's movies.
Sent 2: It is true that Moore's film is sometimes unintentionally deceptive, but to call it fraudulent is hyperbole to the extreme.
Sent 3: It is no more so than any other successful documentary of the last decades.
Sent 4: Let's look at some specific criticisms: 1) The bank scene, listed on your website on a separate page.
Sent 5: Critics have stated that this scene was "staged", but in the bank interview, the official tells Moore that the bank has its own vault storing about 500 weapons at any given time.
Sent 6: It is also a licensed firearms dealer which can perform its own background checks.
Sent 7: In an interview with the Wall Street Journal, linked from your site, an employee claims that the gun would have been "normally" picked up at another dealer.
Sent 8: It is not explained what "normally" is supposed to mean, but that claim flatly contradicts the statement of the bank official in the film.
Sent 9: This sounds more like a later correction for public relations purposes, but of course nobody questions the bank claims when they can be used against Moore.
Sent 10: The only thing that Moore compressed is the timeframe.
Sent 11: According to the same WSJ interview, "Typically, you're looking at a week to 10 days waiting period."Sent 12: This is plausible -- but entirely irrelevant for the movie, which already makes it quite clear that a background check is being performed.
Sent 13: Moore's detractors have sometimes extended those 7-10 days to several weeks, contradicting the bank's own estimate.
Sent 14: There is nothing inaccurate whatsoever about the bank scene.
Sent 15: The bank does exactly what it advertises: It hands out guns from its vault to those who open an account.
Sent 16: The silly criticisms of the scene obscure the real obscenity of the situation: a bank handing out guns to its customers, higlighting the utter laxness of how Americans deal with deadly weapons and a love of firearms that borders on the religious.
A:
How many guns does the bank have in it's vault to hand out to those who open an account?