IN: This is an email
Clement,  I had sent you a draft of a guaranty by Enron Corp. for ECS  Compression Company, L.L.C. earlier. Have you had a chance to review and  obtain execution yet. Please let me know the status. Thanks for your help 

What is the subject?

OUT: Guaranty
QUESTION: Dr. Wilkens,  Thank you for your time and advice. I would appreciate if you would be able  to provide me with contact information for Dr. Jim Jones at the University of  Florida as well as Dr. Joe Ritchie, per your offer to do so. Thanks again, 
Propose a subject line for this email?
ANS: DSSAT
Paul,  I am sending you modified bullet points. The modifications are in red. Apologies for a delay in responding to your messages. By the way, Power2001 gets only more and more interesting every day. Vince 
Q: What is a potential subject line for this email?
answer: Bullet points
Anything can happen, but Hedy just talked to the Executive Offficer of the  Senate Rules committee who told her that it is very unlikely that the full  Senate would vote on any contempt report before the Senate leaves for recess;  that is, they likely wouldn't vote on anything until they return in August. Other info from the conversation: With respect to fines, sanctions, etc., he said that "they're making it up as  they go." Any vote on fines, etc. would only a require a simple majority to pass. 
Answer: Dunn
Here is an email: I have had several conversations with EPNG about the possibility of ENA turning back capacity to satisfy 1) requests for new capacity in the Power Up 2000 project and 2) any possible capacity that EPNG may need to provide to satisfy incremental needs of full requirements customers as they convert billing determinants to Contract Demand quantities. In order to preserve our position, should I send a formal letter to Al Clark stating our desire to turn the capacity back? The Power Up 2000 deadline is noon, Thursday, August 2, 2001. They did not provide for turn back in the posting that is currently on the capacity system. While we do not know how EPNG will be forced to resolve their capacity issues in the receipt point allocation proceeding, I believe that a letter can help us preserve our position should we choose to turn back capacity under either scenario. We have approx. 54,000 of Block I and III capacity and 200,000 of Block III capacity. The Block II capacity is subject to PG&E recall - PG&E paid approx. $58 million for those recall rights in a settlement. Could EPNG pay a negotiated sum of money for the remaining value of the recall rights to fund the needs full requirement customers? I have to believe this option would be cheaper than adding new  capacity. Leslie - could you help me with the letter? Many thanks! Stephanie 
What is a potential subject line for this email?
A: Turnback of EPNG Capacity
QUESTION: Joanie called Kara at CES about deal 282945. This is the CGAS citygate gas  for Energy Express. We are selling the gas to CES and CES is reselling it to  Energy Express. Kara told Joanie that she does not expect the volumes to  change on this deal. Scott needs to work on the capacity sheet so we can tell how much transport  CES actually has. There should be some big changes in CES's transport  numbers for June. (Ex  ENA purchased the BG&E capacity on contract  k#65403). Also, if ENA elected to release CES capacity to Clinton or IGS,   we need to make sure we record that correctly on the ENA sheet. Any credits  we show on the CES sheet will be passed thru to CES. 
Propose a subject line for this email?
ANS:
Sale to Energy Express via CES