These over the counter prices are best  viewed with a fixed width font such as  Lucida Console or Courier New. SPORT SHOTGUN - 12 Gauge 3"  .......................................                           Money   Charge  SKU # Barrel     Stock   Order     Card  .......................................  10610 28" 2 Ribs Walnut 1086.00 1140.00 * 10615 26" 2 Ribs Walnut 1086.00 1140.00   SPORT Accessories  ........................................  SKU # Item                        Charge  ........................................  80097 Stepped Rib for 26" Barrel   95.95  80098 Stepped Rib for 28" Barrel   95.95  80099 Low Rib for 26" Barrel       95.95  80100 Low Rib for 28" Barrel       95.95  80101 Wide Trap Rib for 26" Barrel 95.95  80102 Wide Trap Rib for 28" Barrel 95.95  80126 Stock Satin Walnut          210.95  80127 Forend Satin Walnut         118.95   Federal law requires that we receive a signed  copy of your local dealers federal firearms  license before we can ship a firearm. Dealers  will charge you a small fee to receive a firearm  for you, and to complete the necessary paperwork. (Shop around, the fee varies from dealer to dealer,  usually between $10.00 - $30.00.) We are required to collect 8.5% New York State  sales tax if the firearm is shipped to a dealer  in New York. Out-of-state sales are tax-free. Upon receipt of your payment, including shipping  and insurance, (2% of your total order, $10.00  minimum, for long guns. To comply with UPS guide- lines, handguns are shipped Next Day Air and the  cost will vary with the weight and destination,)  we ship to your dealer and you pick up your  purchase at his store. 
Answer: Benelli Sport 10610
The speaker introduced a bill that would:  Order the CA PUC to establish a "rate component" to permit the utilities to  recover its "net undercollected amount" over a period of ten years. (Sounds  like there may be a haircut in there somewhere.) Authorize the State Water Dept. to purchase power on behalf of utilities and  munis. Order the CA PUC to create a separate rate component to cover the Dept. 's  cost of purchasing the power. Authorize the Treasurer to issue debt, backed by ratepayers, to cover any  difference between the price the Water Dept. buys the power for and the price  that can be collected from ratepayers under the rate freeze. Authorizes the State Director of Finance to "accept on behalf of the state  any tangible asset of an electrical corporation." (Presumably the state is  looking to get something from the IOUs (say, the hydro assets) in exchange  for giving the utility it's "net undercollected amount." The bill is long and haven't yet had a chance to review it in detail. We're  faxing the bill. The bill will be controversial and it is unclear who in the Legislature has  bought into it, though the Governor signaled his general support for this  sort of approach in a press conference last night announcing the results of  the power auction. The Assembly is scheduled to have a hearing on the bill later today. Will pass on more info as we get it. Jeff 
Answer: New Bill Introduced in CA Legislature
Your fax of the signed NDA did not come through all the way, I only got part  of the first page. Could you please refax back the whole document so I can  get it signed by Enron. Thanks! 
Answer: NDA - GreenAsh Corporation
CONFIDENTIAL  Because many of the same people would be involved in the below-referenced telecons, both of which relate to developing public and gov relations strategies, some in the context of legal issues, I have scheduled a one hour conference call, half hour each for Roseville and the DC Line to SF. I have indicated who at least I would like involved in each conversation. The rest of you can feel free to listen on the whole thing, or drop off or call in as appropriate. If I have left anyone out of the list, please call me to discuss, as I would like to restrict these discussions to the recipients of the email. (Mark - if you wish Eric or Karen to participate, no problem.) The call in number for both calls will be 800-820-4690 (passcode: 7012645#)  1:00 - 1:30pm:  ROSEVILLE  "Required" participants 	Wehn 	Brodbeck 	Jones 	Russeth 	Govenar(s)  ISSUE - Butte county APCD is resisting the transfer of certain ERCs that we own from Butte county to Placer county for our Roseville project. I want to discuss who knows who and which of them we can call to enlist support for our position. For example, Kelly has already petitioned CARB, who have said that this is not right and will pressure them. I will get a letter from the ISO indicating the general economic support our Roseville project will have to the area, including Butte. Dean Russell and Rick Johnson are going to get the support of the Building Trades because of the obvious risk on jobs. I would guess that all of Kelly's new-found farmer friends (sorry, they are called growers out here) can make a few phone calls. I am sure that Scott and Heady can find some political friends in Sacto that we can call. Etc. Please come to the telecon with a list of who you have already contacted, and who we may consider contacting. In the interest of time, I want to set the stage for giving Kelly and Sam some clear guidelines and assignments. Then we can let them do their work and report. And we can get on to the next subject. 1:30 - 2:00 pm:  DC LINE TO SF  "Required" Participants 	Palmer 	Russeth 	Govenar(s) 	Etringer 	Gray 	Dasovich 	Rasmussen	  ISSUE - As we have discussed, we are developing a strategy that, if successful, would result in a transmission line solution to SF's electrical problems. I would like this telecon to be a kick off to discussing/developing a PR and Government relations strategy. Each of you have reviewed my summary email of last week (I have attached a copy for Dasovich and Palmer), so I will not repeat here. It is for the most part self explanatory on issues, status, benefits, etc. Please bring to the telecon your thoughts. 
Answer:
Public and government telecon re SF DC line and Roseville  ERCs/Butte County issue