Given the task definition, example input & output, solve the new input case.
In this task, you are given a public comment from online platforms. You are expected to classify the comment into two classes: threat and non-threat. Threat is a statement that someone will be hurt or harmed, especially if the person does not do something in particular.
Example: Comment: Enough already.  Cut the head off this snake.
Output: Threat
This comment conveys a violent threat to someone.

New input case for you: Comment: Those "talking points" as you call them are simply reality. Your subjective filters may not want to accept those truths but they still exist. My suspicion is that you're the one parroting someone else's talking points, not the author.

As an example: while researching Trump's projected budget cuts to the state department I found a Breitbart piece predicting a 37% reduction in their budget. In the article, the author of this particular opinion piece took the side of cutting foreign aid while increasing defense spending. Now all the conservative faithful are simply parroting Breitbart.

Basically, Trump's budget merely reflects his monumental ignorance.
Output:
Non-threat