You will be given a review about a book, an item, a place or a movie. After that, a question is given that you should answer using a certain span of the review. Your answer should be from the review itself and should not contain extra words, and should not be a combination of different spans. If there's no direct answer to the question, answer with a part of the text that is the most relevant to the question. See the examples for clarification.

[Q]: review: I found this movie to be very well-acted and well-directed.The sexual scenes didn't bother me not one bit, like some of the other reviewers.I mean, COME ON!!---This is life in the 21st Century!--Grow up already!People get naked and they interact, okay?---Thank goodness that computers and gadgetshaven't spoiled that for us (yet!), as it has with basic conversational skills and other formsof by-gone or slowly dying human interaction.I actually know both a lesbian couple, as well as a gay male couple whoare living similar circumstances as in the premise of this movie.I found it very modern, refreshing, and mature in it's approach to the subject matter.I have long been a fan of Mark Ruffalo, Julianne Moore and Annette Benning's work,and I also thought "the kids" themselves did an excellent job at portraying their roles.My problem was in that I felt like the Mark Ruffalo character kind of had his once happyand balanced, (for him), life just upheaved and torn apart when he gets contacted by these "kids",who of course, have every right to know who their father / donor was, and also what his background is.Ruffalo's character had a great attitude (I thought) about the whole thing...He was naturally pensive and cautious at first, though not in a malicious way, but soon warmed to theidea that he had these "kids" in his life now, and was more than open to getting to know them, and allowthem to get to know him. I felt that Annette Benning's character, who felt threatened, in addition to justbeing an anal-retentive, controlling witch with a capital B, was very mean and cold towards Ruffalo's character.Julianne Moore's character was a bit of a messy, confused, psychological user.Moore's character is that kind of person who is filled with inner turmoil or frustration, but makes it everybodyelse's problem around her. I hated how she treated the latino gardener too, just because she felt guiltyabout all of the drama and calamity that she was causing in her affair with Ruffalo's character!I always say: "Don't jump in the river, if you're not a strong swimmer, babe!" (-:Ruffalo's character was the perfect outlet for her pent up sexual confusion / tension,and the two (again) enter into a very complicated and torrid affair, which of course, couldonly end in heartache for all concerned.  As soon as Moore's character quenches her sexual thirst/curiosity,she just basically returns back to her life relationship Benning's character and the "kids",after she and Ruffalo's character are found out, and they all seem to throw Ruffalo's character under the bus...As if to say, "Okay babe, we've all uprooted you from your life, and now we're done with ya!--So ummmm---kay, bye!"This kind of left a bad taste in my mouth, as Ruffalo's character is literally lefton the outside looking in, as Benning & Moore & the kids reunion-reconnection happens without him.He is locked out of their lives...Lives that he really never knew exsisted in the first place,until they invaded his, satiated their curiosity, and sent him packing.Not cool, I felt. )-:Not saying that Ruffalo's character was a saint or anything, but the man had his own businessand his own life...as unorthodox as it was...but then again, wasn't Benning, Moore and the kids' livesjust as unorthodox? I guess I just wished that a balance could've been reached between all parties,and it could've ended on that note, instead of Ruffalo's character, who btw, he played with a great spirit& optimism, being dejected and disregarded. Just my humble opinion of course. (-:I still enjoyed this movie though, despite its (what I considered to be) plot flaws. **4 Stars**
question: How can I control the tension so that it is not high?
[A]: -:Ruffalo 's character was the perfect outlet for her pent up sexual confusion / tension


[Q]: review: Disney's new animation film "Wreck-It Ralph" follows the story of Ralph, a "villain" of an arcade game "Fix-It Felix, Jr." But Ralph is only playing the role of a villain. What he really wants to be is a hero.To win a hero's medal, Ralph leaves the world of an 8-bit game machine where he has been "working" for thirty years. After causing havoc in a first-person shooting game world (where he learns that a modern game is very "violent"), Ralph meets Vanellope, a cute little girl who is a character of a racing game "Sugar Rush."The film's premise looks simple at first, but as the story unfolds, the film has much more to offer, with a handful of clever twists and turns, as well as rich colors and detailed movements of game characters. The story of Ralph and Vanellope is sweet, reflecting the film's theme of friendship and self-discovery, but not too sweet, with credible character interactions.The old-fashioned games at arcade would make some adult viewers feel nostalgic, but the film does not rely on the idea to entertain us. There are also so many references to video games (a certain character is now "out of work"), but it is interesting and likable characters that move the plot forward. "Wreck-It Ralph" is a great example of Disney at its best. It is hugely enjoyable.
question: Do you have adorable characters?
[A]: with credible character interactions


[Q]: review: Personally I'm not a big lemon fan one way or another, just find it okay - it's not my go to flavor when shopping.  But my girlfriend, she loves lemon flavored everything.  I got these for her & they didn't disappoint.  The flavoring is not overly strong, so don't assume these to be tart.  The flavor is sweet, but with a nice lemon hint to the icing.  I think the outer cookies were great as well, so no complaints from me - and I wasn't even planning on liking these.  My girlfriend already wants to put these on the next shopping list, so I guess I found a winner.
question: How good is the cookie?
[A]:
the outer cookies were great


