Given a document and an entity the task is to select the author's sentiment towards the entity. Sentiments can be Positive, Neutral and Negative. Select Positive if the article expresses a positive view towards the given entity or praises its quality or skills. Select Neutral if the document expresses no clear view towards the entity or has equal amounts of positive and negative statements or expressing some fact/quote by someone else. Select Negative if the article expresses a negative view towards like harsh remarks, criticizing entities action/decision etc. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].

What is the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Roger Goodell ? NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell  said Wednesday  he  wants to see the league's rulemaking competition committee "start over" from scratch this offseason and rewrite the sport's complicated catch rule by employing a common-sense approach.
"From our standpoint  I think I would like to start back  instead of adding to the rule or subtracting [from] the rule  start over again and look at the rule fundamentally from the start because I think when you add or subtract  then it still leads to confusion "  Goodell  said at  his  annual state-of-the-league address during Super Bowl week.
Particular attention should be given   Goodell  said  to the portion of the rule that requires a receiver who goes to the ground while making a catch to maintain possession of the football while on the turf.
"You look at the catch-no catch rule  the officials are officiating it correctly "  Goodell  said. "What we have to do is find a rule that we think is going to address what we think should be a catch and no catch."
To that end   Goodell  said  a group of players  coaches and officials met at the NFL's offices in New York in recent weeks  spending about three hours studying approximately 150 plays to attempt to determine what should and shouldn't be ruled a legal catch.
"I think we have some very good ideas that we're going to submit to the competition committee "  Goodell  said. "I think there will be a lot of focus on going to the ground  which I think is a big part of the confusion for everyone with respect to that rule. And I think we've got a great opportunity here to get this rule right so that everyone understands and appreciates it and that's not the focus going forward."
Still   Goodell  said Wednesday  he  thinks that progress is possible.
"I'm not here to tell you there won't be controversy "  he  said. "But I believe we can get to a much better place."
Positive

What is the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Kate Steinle ? The disturbing verdict in the killing of  Kate Steinle  â finding a criminal illegal alien not guilty of the most serious charges for  her  death â illustrates the need to find a way to end the âsanctuary citiesâ movement that has spread around the nation.
 Steinle  was only 32 when  she  was shot and killed in July 2015 by a bullet fired by illegal alien Jose Ines Garcia Garcia Zarate  who had a record of seven felony convictions and five previous deportations. Garcia Zarate did not deny shooting  Steinle   but said  it  was an accident.
Garcia Zarate had been freed by San Francisco authorities three months before he shot  Steinle   despite a federal immigration detention request to hold him so federal officials could take him into custody.
 Steinle  had none of those protections as  she  stood over the San Francisco Bay with  her  father  who would know  her  pleas for help as the last thing  he âd ever hear  her  utter in a too-short life.
The sanctuary jurisdictions create opportunities for further harm  just like that posed by  Steinle âs killer. Their claim is that sanctuary cities are actually as safe as or safer than others  with illegal residents less likely to break the law and more likely to cooperate with law enforcement when real crimes occur.
Kate  Steinle âs tragic case is but one in a sea of unnecessary tears.
 The stories of Kate Steinle and Veronica Cabrera Ramirez  will fade with the passage of time. But  theirs  will simply be replaced by the stories of future victims of heinous and predictable crimes committed by criminal illegal aliens who take advantage of American kindness and weakness.
Neutral

What is the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Bill Akins ? For years   Bill Akins  fought to capitalize on  his  idea - with the U.S. government   his  former business partner and a rival competitor - but found  himself  stymied at every turn.
The 63-year-old Marine veteran and Elvis impersonator voiced  his  sorrow at the tragedy in Las Vegas  where authorities said Stephen Paddock had bump stocks installed on 12 of his rifles. The device allows semi-automatic weapons to fire almost as rapidly as machine guns  which are largely outlawed.
“I would like to express my dismay and sincere condolences to the victims  families and anyone affected by the recent Las Vegas mass shooting ”  Akins  said during a telephone interview from  his  home about 45 minutes north of Tampa  Florida.
But  he  also defended the devices as protected under the U.S. Constitution’s right to bear arms.
“People need to recognize that we either have a constitution  or we don‘t ”  he  said.
 Akins  first came up with  his  idea while watching a documentary about World War Two in 1996 that showed twin anti-aircraft guns firing at Japanese warplanes from a U.S. Navy ship.
 He  saw the barrels sliding back and forth with each concussive recoil and wondered if  he  could design a device that would mimic that action  turning a semi-automatic rifle that fires once per trigger pull into a weapon capable of shooting hundreds of rounds per minute.
The result  which  he  eventually termed the “Akins Accelerator ” seemed promising enough. Akins teamed up with a firearms industry businessman  secured two letters from the Bureau of Alcohol  Tobacco  Firearms and Explosives (ATF) affirming the mechanism behind the device was legal  and poured his savings into the project.
Another company  Slide Fire Solutions  began making its own version of the bump stock that was approved by the ATF  in large part because it lacked a recoil spring that  Akins  had included.
 Akins  transferred  his  patent to an outdoor sporting goods company  FosTecH Outdoors  and the two rival manufacturers engaged in a legal battle over patent infringement before settling the case in 2012.
 Akins  is limited in what  he  can say about the litigation  saying only that  he  is “legally prevented” from discussing certain aspects of the bump stock industry. But  he  made clear  his  ire at the ATF.
“They just destroyed our business ”  he  said.
 Akins  put up  his  own property as collateral for a loan to launch the business.  He  estimated  he  sold several hundred devices  priced at more than $1 000 each  before  he  was shut down - not enough to cover  his  startup costs.
 He  filed two unsuccessful federal lawsuits against the ATF  leaving  him  with a workshop full of unused Akins Accelerators.
“Boy  did I get an education ”  he  said. “I‘m not a person who’d ever done business before with a corporation  never worked in the firearm industry before  just a tinkerer that came up with an idea.”

Positive

