Given a real-life anecdote of a complex ethical situation, identify who is wrong here. Classify each post into the following categories : AUTHOR (if the author of the post is wrong in the situation), OTHER (if any of the others mentioned in the paragraph is wrong), EVERYBODY (if everyone mentioned is wrong) and NOBODY (if no one is wrong in the situation).

This is a repost from another sub because I wanted more feedback if possible. Original post has more info (3000 character max in AITA)

**BACKGROUND**

I’m a senior in university. I am pretty isolated. I for the past three years I have kept maybe one friend and my boyfriend. I have anxiety and depression. The last year has been especially hard. Basically, I only go outside of my house for school or my part time job.

A few months ago I got back in touch with a friend from freshman year, Sarah, and she invited me to eat lunch with her new friend group. The group includes Molly \[f/21\], Alex \[x/21\], and Candice \[f/22\]. I have known all of these people but was never very close to them.

Sarah and Candice are definitely leaving the country that we’re in after graduation in June, and Molly and Alex are not sure yet it seems. Additionally, Sarah and Candice are not going to be here from next week to end of May so I wanted to spend as much time with them as possible before they go.

**THE SITUATION**

Keep in mind at this point, we’ve hung out maybe 2-3 times a month maximum since February. So to me this is a LOT but to them it might be nothing, especially since they hang out more as a group.

Sarah, Molly and I had plans to go to a European restaurant for lunch on a specific day. I mentioned that I had work after and it’s not far from my work so it would be convenient! *DISCLOSURE: The place has options that I can eat (I have a certain diet that means I’m not just able to go to any restaurant without researching a bit)*

I had mentioned that we should invite Alex and Candice but that I didn’t have their contact/a group chat so I expected if anything Sarah and Molly would invite them. I’m not sure if they did though.

The day before we were supposed to hang out, I was checking the site for the restaurant online and realized it would be closed. I texted Sarah and Molly and mentioned it and asked if they would prefer going to another place or if they would rather reschedule. They both said that they were cool with rescheduling. 

The next day (when we were originally supposed to hang out), I’m checking Instagram. And I see that Sarah, Molly, Alex, and Candice all posted a story that they were in the same area for lunch as the European restaurant we were supposed to go to. Literally down the block. I wasn’t invited.

We rescheduled out lunch plan 30 minutes ago. Also Sarah invited me to a picnic in the park on Sunday yesterday. But I still can't help but be a bit upset still.

I’m pretty socially isolated so I am aware that maybe this situation is something people normally wouldn’t be upset about. I have heard that not being around people enough can twist one’s perceptions of what people are doing so I wanted to ask for advice on how to navigate my feelings and/or the situation.

I don’t want to be that person who butts into a group and ruins the whole vibe. I don’t know.

**WITBA if I mention that I feel left out?**
NOBODY

It got a litte bit longer than I thought so td;lr at the bottom.

Little bit of backround: 
I [F 25] moved away from home to a new town and I was looking online for new friends. There I found Kim [F 30] (fake name) and we seemed to have a lot in common. We chattet for some weeks bevore we decided to meet in person.

Even though we chatted online constantly the conversation was really slow when we met up. I  had to keep the conversation going on my own or we would be sitting there in silence. Additional to that most of her responses were only 1-2 word sentences...  It was really awkward and also kinda exhausting for me because I am a litte shy around new people and an introvert. 

After our meeting she wrote me how much fun she had and that she was looking forward to seeing me again. So I figured that she is even more shy than me and that she maybe only had to warm up to me. So we met again several times and while I noticed that she became more talkative, she would never start the conversation on her own and it was still difficult to keep a conversation going. A few months into our friendship I found out from one of her posts on social media that she has social anxiety, so I guess that explains her behaiviour.

But I soon found myself dreading our meetings... At this point we knew each other for about 8 months and we had met like 10 times. I don't know if you would call that a friendship, for me she was more of an acquaintance. Meeting her was really mentally exhausting for me because of her inability to have a ongoing conversation. Meeting friends is supposed to charge my battery but it was the total opposite.

I thought she guessed that our meetings weren't as fun for me as they were for her, because after our last meeting she never wrote me again. And I was relieved because that way I didn't have to end our "friendship" and also never wrote her.

Fast forward to two months later: 
I see online that her husband left her shortly after our last meetup (he already got a new girlfriend) and that she has a depression. I think she didn't write me because of her husband leaving her and now I feel kinda bad. I thought about reaching out I think she could use a friend and I know she doesn't have any in this city but I don't want to honestly....



Td;lr 
Met [F 25] a girl [F 30] online and we met a few times. She is super shy and never contributed to our conversations so I had to keep them going. I found myself not wanting to be her friend and when she didn't write me I never reached out again. Now I found out she has depression because her husband left her and I think she never wrote me because of her situation. Now I feel bad.


So AITA because I don't reach out even though I now know of her depression and divorce?
NOBODY

Recently my 10th grade English class read through lord of the flies, and at the very beginning we held a vote, between piggy, Ralph, Jack, and Simon, to determine who we thought was the best chief.

The first time we elected I picked Jack. And was almost unanimously ousted by the Simon crowd.

Then we held a second election with our knowledge of how the book ended.  When I voted jack, I drew a response of "what the f***", and the rest of the class (including the teacher) argued against me

My resolution is to write an essay on two things, first off why Jack would make a bitchin' leader, but more importantly, why the concept of a "correct opinion" detracts from modern, intellectual society.

TL:DR everyone got angry at me for arguing that a seemingly evil leader is the lesser of 4 evils. Wrote an essay to prove the concept of "correct opinion" wrong

NOBODY

