Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.

I would imagine a responsible person would get another job or even two even if it were washing dishes to take care of his own. A non-productive person would rather take a government handout, that's why our state and national budgets or so badly in debt, plus our education spending is quite ridicules. That's my humble opinion and that's where I would start cutting.  Mr. Civility  :)
Yes

Notice how you failed to address the fact I referenced, and went straight into attacking me with juvenile remarks? The more liberals cram us in on top of each other through high density planning the more traffic becomes congested. More people = more traffic, and therein why the problem is going to become worse. rather then post juvenile remarks attacking me, try addressing the issue of this board, and the fact I have referenced.
No

She sounds like she could be a welcome addition to that group; she's smart, she is detail-oriented and energetic enough to actually research issues, and her training should come in handy. I suppose she has faults, which Paul Conte has enumerated, but she is only one of many on that group. Her weakness should be balanced by others' strengths.

On the other hand, I find it completely reprehensible that Clair Syrett voted for her based primarily on the configuration of the organs between her legs; and even more so that Syrett didn't even know who the other members on the commission were.

No

