Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.

Yes.
Why would you even ask such a question? Have you ever considered that  ramp-up in conjunction with the known outcome of SB 21 combined with foreign policy moves in the MidEast, Ukraine and Russia point at a contrived, i.e. engineered scheme with Alaska and other states as pawns to international intrigue?
No

Please explain why this event requires an endorsement for any kind of protest. Campaign visits to Eugene by presidential candidates Bill Clinton and Barack Obama were met here with lollipops and rainbows (and in the latter case, ice cream cones and a basketball jersey). Upon each's somber return in the wake of the Thurston and UCC shootings, protestors were derided for not respecting the office; you were near the front of that parade of criticism last fall.

I'm not 73, have never protested anything and have never believed telling others how to live is being a good neighbor, never mind a responsible citizen. However, I've long had a fascination with successful people, regardless of their political stripe, who somehow possess the mettle to move mountains. That includes Clinton and Obama, among many others.

Like it or not, Trump has accomplished something quite remarkable. That flaccid guarantee of contentiousness for his visit is not.
No

Well I have no doubt that that is the version of the story Murkowski chooses to believe but it's not the truth. There would have been no wait lists in the Phoenix VA, McCains hometown VA, if they had been adequately funded to be able to hire more clerks as well as healthcare providers. Sanders got McCain to come on board as cosponsor of essentially the same bill just to get some of the recalcitrant  Republican senators on board. Why didn't McCain of all people know what was happening at the Phoenix VA do you suppose? Murkowski, Sullivan and Young endorsed the odious Trump even after he called Mexicans rapists and murderers, proposed a ban on all Muslims coming to America and then more recently the claim that a judge could not be trusted to preside over a fair trial because he was of Mexican heritage though born in America to parents who came here before Drumpf's parents did. Lisa is in a very difficult position made worse by her fealty to party over country.

Yes

