Teacher: Given a paragraph about cooking, and a set of conversational question answers about the paragraph, generate a relevant question to the topic of the paragraph. The paragraph has the prefix 'CONTEXT:'. Each conversation question has a prefix `Q:` followed by the answer prefix `A:`.
Teacher: Now, understand the problem? If you are still confused, see the following example:
CONTEXT: Milk won't help you - it's mostly water, and gluten develops from flour (more accurately, specific proteins in flour) and water.The way to reduce gluten development is to incorporate more fat into the batter. Lipids are hydrophobic and will prevent further hydration of the glutenin.Using a lower-protein flour will also help. If you're not already using cake flour, the reason it's called cake flour is because of the lower protein content.That being said, have you actually tried leaving the batter coarse? Just because the batter is lumpy does not mean that the cake will have big lumps. The entire mixture is wet, so unless you leave huge lumps of dry flour in the batter, you won't end up with a lumpy cake. There's a difference between don't overmix and don't mix - you're supposed to mix enough to incorporate, just don't try homogenize it. <sep> Q: How can I avoid lumps in the cake? A: have you actually tried leaving the batter coarse? Just because the batter is lumpy does not mean that the cake will have big lumps Q: No, I haven't. I'll try that next. Is it safe to add more milk into the batter? A: Milk won't help you - it's mostly water, and gluten develops from flour (more accurately, specific proteins in flour) and water.
Solution: What can I add to make it more softer and avoid hardening?
Reason: This conversation is about the process of preparing cakes and how lumps can be avoided in it. The question asked is relevant as it is on the same topic and it asks how to avoid hardening of cake. This is also a followup question of the last conversational question and answer about adding more milk into the cake batter.

Now, solve this instance: CONTEXT: I don't think so. In the mayonnaise case, all that has happened is the fat has come out of emulsion and gathered together again, so you can re-emulsify it. In the whipped cream case, you've started to create large fat crystals (butter). I guess technically it might work to heat it up to melt the butter, re-emulsify it into cream and then beat it again, but I don't think it would be worth the effort. You could go ahead and finish churning it into butter and buttermilk if you want to avoid wasting the cream.  <sep>  Q: Can ruined whipped cream be rescued? A: but I don't think it would be worth the effort  Q: Whatâs the process? A: heat it up to melt the butter, re-emulsify it into cream and then beat it again 
Student:
Can it be Re emulsified?###Or am I better off starting a fresh batch?