In this task, you're given a statement, and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine which sentence clearly disagrees with the statement. Indicate your answer as '1', '2', or '3' corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence.

Input: Consider Input: Statement: How would they act when they saw the whole village burn? Choices:  1. How would the elders react to their village being burned by the poor? 2. It was obvious how they'd react. 3. How would they respond to the village burning? 

Output: 2


Input: Consider Input: Statement: The Slums of Beverly Hills also walks a line between two genres, in this case coming-of-age sex comedy and autobiographical monologue. Choices:  1. Beverly Hills Slums split between two genres, one of coming-of-age sex comedy and autobiographical monologue. 2. The Slums of Beverly Hills never formed a rift of genres, instead only focusing on coming-of-age sex comedies. 3. The autobiographical monologue phenomenon is of greater intensity than the comedies of the Beverly Hills Slums.

Output: 2


Input: Consider Input: Statement: yeah it just got the the name of being an oak because it's got a kind of an acorn kind of thing on it Choices:  1. Its called an oak because it possesses an acorn type thing on it. 2. Trees produce more acorns in the spring. 3. It's called an oak because of the leaves thing on it.


Output: 3


