Categorize the comment on the basis of threat. If the comment is threatening output Yes, otherwise output No.

It is a pretty flat pay scale for the nano guy. As a long-time full professor in engineering/computer science in San Diego he was probably making $175,000 a year or more. So he doubles his pay to become chief of a huge research center, and makes ~10X more than the lowest-paid employee. He probably makes less than some of the doctors in the institute.
No

Shame that innocent farmers that supply Oregon and Nevada food source are so quickly called criminals... everyone needs to carry a gun for protection it's a Constitutional right, and I carry regularly too as there is too much crime, and the silly states that are accepting refugees will find that out soon.  As Florida had.  Say what you may, I had my say. Silly liberals.
Yes

Natron Wood Products is not within any city limit, or even within the urban growth boundary either.   It is next to the road in between Jasper and Fall Creek.  The way the law reads, it would thus seem that he would of had to have intentionally attempted to have used the gun against a another person, in order to be charged with unlawful use of a weapon.

Yet, this article says nothing about him doing that.   In fact, it states that he fired in an unknown direction.  So if the direction that he shot in is indeed unknown, how can he be charged with this crime?   I don't understand that.

There must be more to this story.

Yes

