Definition: In this task you are given an anecdote, which recount a complex ethical situation. The question you are given is, has the author of the anecdote acted ethically? answer this question with "RIGHT" or "WRONG".
Input: This is for my friend (18F).

Context:
The bf was supposed to meet my friend's family for a meal (the parents are trying to see if the boy is good for her) but he overslept and ended up missing the entire thing. He still came anyway and met them when they were on the way out. The parents then "jokingly" told him to treat the family to a meal 3 months later to make up for it (they meant it). It didn't have to be anything fancy, it could be dirt cheap, but he has to treat it. All he responded in that moment was that he didn't want to make false promises and that he was afraid that he'll oversleep again. It was a bad response.

The problem:
He was peeved that my friend didn't stand up for him in that moment of time as he felt that it was rude for the parents to do that in the first meeting, and that he didn't want to spend his mother's money for that. My friend explained to him that it wasn't about the meal, the parents just wanted to know him better and that they could share the cost together (her siblings can also help with the burden by not coming). Heck, just coffee for 2.50 in total for the parents as they talk over coffee will do.

He reply was that, HE DIDN'T WANT TO SPEND HIS MOTHER'S MONEY, EMPHASIS ON THE MOTHER. And by that, he meant his allowance. Yet he doesn't mind spending extra money on fast food daily when there are cheaper and healthier food options.

Personally I think the guy's a total loser but 1 person ain't much, what do y'all think?¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Output:
WRONG