The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the no-need strategy, otherwise output No. no-need is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used when a participant points out that they do not need an item based on personal context such as suggesting that they have ample water to spare. no-need can directly benefit the opponent since it implies that the item is up for grabs.

Example input: Context: 
Utterance: 'how about I give you 2 waters and 1 food package in exchange for all your firewood?'
Example output: No
Example explanation: The utterance does not use the no-need strategy since it never refers to an item that the participant does not need.
Q: Context: 'Hi! I'm exited to negotiate a deal with you today. How are you doing?' 'I am doing well! Excited to be on this camping trip! I am glad we have all the basic supplies already.' 'Agreed! I am running low on firewood, unfortunately, which I need to cook food and stay warm. '
Utterance: 'Oh no! That's unfortunate! Luckily, I think I have plenty of Firewood for myself so I think it would be okay for you to have more of that if needed. I don't know if I have enough food. I love to snack all day!'
A:
Yes