Given a paragraph about cooking, and a set of conversational questions and answers about the paragraph, say whether the passage contains sufficient information to answer the follow-up question. Say Yes if it is answerable; otherwise, say No. The paragraph has the prefix 'CONTEXT:'. Each conversation question has a prefix `Q:` followed by the answer prefix `A:`, and the follow-up question has a prefix `FOLLOWUP_Q:`.

CONTEXT: It might be possible to dissolve the candy, and then boil it down again, foaming it with fresh baking soda when it hits the proper stage. The thing is, the candy has already got the full level of baking soda reactants (either sodium carbonate or sodium oxide) from from the first cooking, which may contribute to some off flavors.Instead, if it is enjoyable as is, I would suggest just eating it as a toffee like candy.Otherwise, chalk it up to experience and watch the temperature more closely next time.  <sep>  Q: What can I do with badly cooked honeycomb? A: dissolve the candy, and then boil it down again  Q: What temperature do I need to bring it to for it to become honeycomb? A: I would suggest just eating it as a toffee like candy  Q: Should i throw the badly cooked honeycomb away? A: chalk it up to experience and watch the temperature more closely next time  Q: Would it be a waste to through it away? A: Otherwise, chalk it up to experience and watch the temperature more closely next time  <sep> FOLLOWUP_Q: What other candy could i make if i overcook honeycomb>
No