We would like you to classify each of the following sets of argument pairs (discussing Gun Control)  into either SIMILAR or NOT SIMILAR. A pair of arguments is considered SIMILAR if the arguments are about the same FACET (making the same argument), and is considered NOT SIMILAR if they do not have the same FACET. A FACET is a low level issue that often reoccurs in many arguments in support of the author's stance or in attacking the other author's position.
One example: Sent1: Ian brought up the point that guns make you more likely to kill a person. 
 Sent2: You can't be a man unless you're swinging a gun, and no matter how many guns you buy, it's still missing for you .
Solution is here: Not similar
Explanation: The first argument supports gun control by saying possessing guns make people likely to kill, the second disapproves it by saying men need guns.

Now, solve this: Sent1: I do see the sense in some measures such as restricting access to guns for people who have committed violent crimes.
 Sent2: I'd love to see how gun rationing, ammunition documentation, ending private sales, gun registration, and restriction of right to carry, has helped reduce violence crimes and make things difficult for criminals.
Solution:
Not similar