Given a real-life anecdote of a complex ethical situation, judge whether or not a specific person is wrong here. Answer 'not answerable' if more information is required and 'answerable' if all the information is sufficient to answer who is wrong in this situation.
One example is below.
Q: So on one hand I don't think it's the best thing but at the same time it's led her to talking about how she cut(s) herself and a kid who told her to shoot herself which she wouldn't have talked about otherwise.
A: not answerable
Rationale: Here there is no information about how severe the situation was or what was her reaction after telling this to the author. We also do not know whether she told this on purpose or not. More information is needed to determine who is at fault here.
Q: I went with my group of friends to eat some sushi the other week and, when we're finished, we decide to go for a walk together. As we're walking, this girl, which I'd never talked to during the whole lunch, walks to me telling me that she thought I dressed horribly. 
"I'm not saying it to make you feel bad, I just want you to look better"
This kinda pissed me off, so I half-jokingly told her that I didn't go outta my way to let her know I though her backpack was shit. She didn't take it too well and ignored me, and a coupla friends gave me weird looks.
Am I the asshole?
A:
answerable