Teacher:In this task, you must classify if a given review is positive/negative, indicating your answer as P or N.
Teacher: Now, understand the problem? Solve this instance: _
dirty_work _ has a premise of deliciously mean - spirited potential .
mitch weaver ( norm macdonald ) and his lifelong best friend sam mckenna ( artie lange ) are losers in life : they were constantly picked on in school , and now they can not hold regular jobs .
but as the trailer goes , " there is one thing mitch weaver is good at -- revenge .
"
so he and sam parlay their unmatched skill in getting - even schemes into a marketable revenge - for - hire business called dirty work inc .
this should be the groundwork for a wonderfully wicked black comedy , but for a film called _ dirty_work _ , what ensues is rather clean of spirit .
in fact , what makes mitch and sam start up their business is not a giddy desire to give bullies a taste of their own medicine , but rather
a more sappy reason : sam 's father ( jack warden ) needs a heart transplant , and in order for him to move at the top of the recipient list , his compulsively betting doctor ( chevy chase ) asks the guys for $ 50 , 000 to pay off his bookie .
so for all the scheming that goes on , beneath every underhanded plot is -- gasp !
--a
heart , which undercuts the inherent nastiness of the premise .
not that there is n't a lot of nastiness on display -- there is , but of a different sort .
there are frequent sexual references , most prominently in the form of prostitutes and sam 's impotent father 's ongoing lust for them .
and for a film rated pg-13 , director bob saget ( yes , that bob saget , of _ full_house _ and _ america's_funniest_home_videos _ fame ) and writers frank sebastiano , fred wolf , and macdonald himself , stretch the boundaries of good taste rather far -- arguably a bit too much so
( was not one , but two separate instances of sodomy between animals really necessary ? ) .
but the issue , of course , is not so much of taste as it is humor -- as in
, is it funny or not ?
the answer is a resounding no .
it 's not that macdonald is n't a funny guy .
he was one of the more consistently funny performers on
_ saturday_night_live _ before his much - talked - about firing , and his dry brand of smartass
wit translates well to the big screen ; it also does n't hurt that he 's a natural , likable screen presence .
he is able to give some of his lines a nice acid touch , but , for the most part , the oneliners , as written , are flat , and the broad slapstick gags just do n't work
( one running gag has him being literally tossed out of buildings -- a real riot ) .
still , macdonald 's few shining moments are just about the only moments the film has .
the late chris farley , as hysterical as he ever was , is amusing in a cameo role , but , as a whole , the supporting players are amateurish and seemingly free from any directorial guidance .
saget tries to juice up the proceedings with kitschy cameos by gary coleman , adam sandler , and john goodman , but their minimal novelty value can not prevent _ dirty_work _ from sputtering to the end of its brief 81-minute running time .
the film closes on a sad note of desperation , an indulgent reel of outtakes from which only those involved in the production would derive any amusement .
come to think of it , i can not imagine anyone but those involved in the production to find much amusement in the entirety of _ dirty_work _ .
Student:
N