Given a real-life anecdote of a complex ethical situation, identify who is wrong here. Classify each post into the following categories : AUTHOR (if the author of the post is wrong in the situation), OTHER (if any of the others mentioned in the paragraph is wrong), EVERYBODY (if everyone mentioned is wrong) and NOBODY (if no one is wrong in the situation).

Example input: Pretty much was hanging out with two friends. I was watching the Lakers game. They won at the very last minute and I immediately hopped up and celebrated. Before I could even finish celebrating one friend started going on about how the Lakers suck. It just pissed me off so much I screamed at her to get out my room until she left. 


She knows I'm a huge fan and she likes them too. She was only saying it to antagonize me. Am I the dick here?
Example output: AUTHOR
Example explanation: It is very rude to shout at someone and ask her to leave the room even if her comments may have antagonized the author. Hence author is at fault here.
Q: Backstory: I've known her online for about over half a year now, but we're really close. She has her fair share of traumas from past experiences, is really introverted and shy, and has breakdowns ever so often. We're really supportive of each other.

Last night, she was having a mentally bad day and was barely online for the day. At the end of the day I went to check up on her and told her she would be fine, and she asked me to keep saying nice things to her until she fell asleep. Now I was having a less than good day myself and was mentally exhausted of walking her through getting herself back on her feet time and time again when this happens, so I told her sorry, that I really didn't have the mental energy to do so that time.

She said sorry and went offline, and I've been feeling awful because of it. She's been offline all day.


AITA? Should I have pushed myself through for her well being? Was I justified in asking for a break this time?
A:
NOBODY