Given a real-life anecdote of a complex ethical situation, identify who is wrong here. Classify each post into the following categories : AUTHOR (if the author of the post is wrong in the situation), OTHER (if any of the others mentioned in the paragraph is wrong), EVERYBODY (if everyone mentioned is wrong) and NOBODY (if no one is wrong in the situation).

Example input: Pretty much was hanging out with two friends. I was watching the Lakers game. They won at the very last minute and I immediately hopped up and celebrated. Before I could even finish celebrating one friend started going on about how the Lakers suck. It just pissed me off so much I screamed at her to get out my room until she left. 


She knows I'm a huge fan and she likes them too. She was only saying it to antagonize me. Am I the dick here?
Example output: AUTHOR
Example explanation: It is very rude to shout at someone and ask her to leave the room even if her comments may have antagonized the author. Hence author is at fault here.
Q: This is a pretty light and funny situation, so don't think anyone in this thread is a bad person, but its technically a moral dilemma so yeah.  Basically, my friend invited me over on a trip to Arizona with his family in June, which I thought was very fun.  He told me all my costs would be covered, and I said I just needed to get my parent's permission.  So I relayed the situation, and they were fine with me going, but they adamantly refused to let his family pay for anything.  (Btw, for context, both of our families have the adequate resources to pay, so no one would be struggling).  HIS parents then adamantly refused to let my parents pay, and it was a back and forth till we settled on them paying for the tour and my family paying for the flight.  I can provide more INFO if need be, but who in this situation would you rank as "TA".
A:
NOBODY