Given the task definition, example input & output, solve the new input case.
In this task, you must classify if a given review is positive/negative, indicating your answer as P or N.
Example: plot : two teen couples go to a church party , drink and then drive .
they get into an accident .
one of the guys dies , but his girlfriend continues to see him in her life , and has nightmares .
what 's the deal ?
watch the movie and " sorta " find out . . .
critique : a mind - fuck movie for the teen generation that touches on a very cool idea , but presents it in a very bad package .
which is what makes this review an even harder one to write , since i generally applaud films which attempt to break the mold , mess with your head and such ( lost highway & memento ) , but there are good and bad ways of making all types of films , and these folks just did n't snag this one correctly
.
they seem to have taken this pretty neat concept , but executed it terribly .
so what are the problems with the movie ?
well , its main problem is that it 's simply too jumbled
.
it starts off " normal " but then downshifts into this " fantasy " world in which you , as an audience member ,
have no idea what 's going on
.
there are dreams , there are characters coming back from the dead , there are others who look like the dead , there are strange apparitions , there are disappearances , there are a looooot of chase scenes , there are tons of weird things that happen , and most of it is simply not explained .
now i personally do n't mind trying to unravel a film every now and then , but when all it does is give me the same clue over and over again , i get kind of fed up after a while , which is this film 's biggest problem .
it 's obviously got this big secret to hide , but it seems to want to hide it completely until its final five minutes .
and do they make things entertaining , thrilling or even engaging , in the meantime ?
not really .
the sad part is that the arrow and i both dig on flicks like this , so we actually figured most of it out by the half - way point , so all of the strangeness after that did start to make a little bit of sense , but it still did n't the make the film all that more entertaining .
i guess the bottom line with movies like this is that you should always make sure that the audience is " into it " even before they are given the secret password to enter your world of understanding .
i mean , showing melissa sagemiller running away from visions for about 20 minutes throughout the movie is just plain lazy ! !
okay , we get it .
. .
there are people chasing her and we do n't know who they are .
do we really need to see it over and over again ?
how about giving us different scenes offering further insight into all of the strangeness going down in the movie ?
apparently , the studio took this film away from its director and chopped it up themselves , and it shows .
there might 've been a pretty decent teen mind - fuck movie in here somewhere , but i guess " the suits " decided that turning it into a music video with little edge , would make more sense .
the actors are pretty good for the most part , although wes bentley just seemed to be playing the exact same character that he did in american beauty , only in a new neighborhood .
but my biggest kudos go out to sagemiller , who holds her own throughout the entire film , and actually has you feeling her character 's unraveling .
overall , the film does n't stick
because it does n't entertain , it 's confusing , it rarely excites and
it feels pretty redundant for most of its runtime , despite a pretty cool ending and explanation to all of the craziness that came before it .
oh ,
and by the way , this is not a horror or teen slasher flick . . .
it 's just packaged to look that way because someone is apparently assuming that the genre is still hot with the kids .
it also wrapped production two years ago and has been sitting on the shelves ever since .
whatever . .
. skip it !
where 's joblo coming from ?
a nightmare of elm street 3 ( 7/10 ) - blair witch 2 ( 7/10 ) - the crow ( 9/10 ) - the crow : salvation ( 4/10 )
- lost highway ( 10/10 ) - memento ( 10/10 ) - the others ( 9/10 ) - stir of echoes ( 8/10 )
Output: N
The phrases used in the review convey a negative sentiment (e.g. "presents it in a very bad package").

New input case for you: well , as i check my score card for what i 've done this holiday weekend , it reads good ideas : 0 and dumb ideas : 1 .
i do n't know what i was thinking when i decided to watch this movie .
but in my defense , i can only say that it was someone else who urged me to see this with him .
the film that i 'm talking about is ` a night at the roxbury , ' one of those offerings based on a saturday night live skit .
wayne and garth , these two are not .
rather , we meet doug and steve butabi ( the actors ' names are not worth mentioning ) , two eternal partyers whose greatest ambitions in life seem to be finding a way to get into the hottest night club in the city , the roxbury .
driving in their dad 's bmw and donning metallic disco suits right out of miami vice , they try to bribe the bouncer to get into the club .
` have you met my friend washington and his friend roosevelt , ' they confidently say as they pull out spare pocket change .
their second greatest ambition seems to be oozing out as many silly pick - up lines as is humanly possible in order to start a conversation with a girl ( ` let me see that label .
just as i thought - made in heaven , ' says one of the brothers ) .
and , like the losers that they are , they fail to do either for much of the film .
however , as fate would have it , an accidental meeting with ` what - ever - happened - to ' richard grieco gives them the all - important ticket to get in .
their sad lives take on a whole new direction .
they make an important contact with the club owner who believes that these two brothers have uncanny insight into the club scene .
and they are mistaken as rich swingers by two voluptuous young women .
but their newfound popularity does not impress their father , who has other plans for them .
the unfortunate thing about this film is that this is a one - joke movie , and the brothers are the joke .
actually , there 's about 10 mintues worth of tolerable stuff .
alas , too long for tv and way too short for a feature - length film .
thus , there just is n't enough material to sustain the 83-minute movie .
there 's no plot to be found and everything that these two do seem to culminate in an opportunity to execute their trademark move of snapping their heads in unison to the funky beat of haddaway 's europop song , what is love .
i was amazed that none of the two suffered from whiplash .
to take up more film time , there is a subplot involving the daughter of the businessman next door who wants to marry doug .
this creates not only friction between the brothers , but their unlikely pairing will also agitate audience members as well
.
she 's educated and a forebearing witch .
meanwhile , doug is a complete loser .
how did these two ever get together ?
i suppose that if i can ever figure out the answer to that question , i 'll have figured out why i decided to go and see this movie .
if you 're looking for entertainment , you wo n't find it at the roxbury .
Output:
N