The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the self-need strategy, otherwise output No. self-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used to create a personal need for an item in the negotiation, such as by pointing out that the participant sweats a lot to show preference towards water packages.
One example: Context: 'That sounds pretty reasonable as I am in need of firewood the most. Would it be most reasonable to each take what we need most and split the water down the middle?' 'Yes, it would.' 'I think that sounds fair. The problem is that there are 3 waters and one of us would get two and the other one. How should we sort that?'
Utterance: 'You can take the two water. I am not that thirsty most days.'
Solution is here: No
Explanation: In this utterance, the participant does not use self-need since they do not talk about any need for themselves.

Now, solve this: Context: 'I am great. Excited to go camping. How much food do you need?' 'I could use some extra food, I'll be hosting a get-together at my campsite later and will need some to entertain the guests. I'd like 2.' 'That is fine. I can go fishing to get some extra food but I would still like one. Can I take two packages of firewood so I can cook them? '
Utterance: 'Absolutely! I don't think I'll be needing any extra firewood, you can have all three! The only other thing I'd like is 2 waters for my hike in the morning so I can stay hydrated.'
Solution:
Yes