We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.
One example is below.
Q: If gun bans worked there would be no gun deaths in the countries that have banned guns.
A: Valid
Rationale: It is an argument that claims that gun bans will not work.
Q: And from a more recent and somewhat surprising source; "Certainly one of the chief guarantees of freedom under any government, no matter how popular and respected, is the right of citizens to keep and bear arms.
A:
Valid