The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the other-need strategy, otherwise output No. other-need is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used when the participants discuss a need for someone else rather than themselves. For instance, describing the need for firewood to keep the kids warm.

Input: Consider Input: Context: 'I am constantly thirsty and having water on hand is needed. Why is gathering food an issue for you?' 'I am not able to get around as much to gather the food. It could require a lot of walking and I might find nothing. What if I took 2 food, 1 water, and 2 firewood, would that be good for you?' 'How about I take 3 water and 2 firewood and you take the rest?'
Utterance: 'I think I can live with that.'

Output: No


Input: Consider Input: Context: 'Hello! What camping supplies are you looking for the most?' 'Hello! I would like more packages of food the most. What are you looking for?' 'I would need water the most as I forgot to bring enough. I can give you all my food for all of you water, if you'd like?'
Utterance: 'That would be amazing! So I could take all 3 packages of the food and you could have all 3 packages of the water. Now, we just need to split the firewood. Could I take 2 of the firewood leaving you with 1? I think I would need more for cooking the food. '

Output: No


Input: Consider Input: Context: 'In my team old age sicked peoples and kids are there so I need some extra.' 'Is firewood something you want the most? 🙂' 'Yes friend.Because we are going to a snow fall place so we need firewood the most.'
Utterance: 'I don't need firewood that much, you can have all of that'


Output: No


