Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.

[EX Q]: SW-SAZ was the ""pilot program"" for the Eugene remake of the rest of
our city.  I am very grateful to the South Willamette Neighbors and the 4 Neighborhood organizations.   I can't imagine what Eugene would have
looked like without their efforts.  There were 83-pages of complicated 
rezoning changes to single-family homes that seemed ""tailor-made"" for 
the developers.

Frankly, I'm appalled at the Mayor's ""all-comers"" forum;  public trust is at 
an all-time low especially after George Brown's revelations.

It has been very painful to watch our beautiful city trying to be changed to an ugly version of Fresno at ""break-neck speed""...so much tax money spent....so many 
problems:  MUPTES, City Hall, SW-SAZ, Capstone, Kesey Square, etc.   

I also think we need another City Manager.
[EX A]: No

[EX Q]: Unions are one of the largest lobbing groups in the US.  Now they say campaign contribution are not ok.  These guys are as dirty as they come.
[EX A]: Yes

[EX Q]: While I'm busy thanking underrated people, thank YOU Andree for being a consistent gadfly and fly in the ointment questioning those in your own party who engage in conduct unbecoming elected officials. We probably don't agree on much, but you do your homework and you've been right a lot.
[EX A]:
No

