instruction:
The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the uv-part strategy, otherwise output No. uv-part is a selfish negotiation strategy. It is used to undermine the requirements of the opponent. For instance, suggesting that the opponent would not need more firewood since they already have the basic supplies or a suggestion that there might be a store near the campsite where the opponent can get the supplies instead.
question:
Context: 'I'd like to have 2 extra packages of water and firewood.' 'I see. And I would like 2 extra packages of Food and 2 packages of  Water as well.' 'I have a great risk of dehydration.  I really need those 2 extra packages of water. You can have all the extra food.'
Utterance: 'Why do you have a risk of dehyrdation? Because I believe all people do but I do understand some people are at a greater risk then others. Tell me why you are at risk?'
answer:
Yes


question:
Context: 'Haha, I know but I am in the same situation! ☹️ and since I am getting less food I feel like it is fair I get on more firewood since I truly need that 🙂' 'Some extra water for coffee might keep us warm, would you consider taking 1 food, 2 wood, 1 water?' 'Sure I can do that 🙂'
Utterance: 'I think we have a deal!!'
answer:
No


question:
Context: 'Can you explain yourself better? What you need the least is food?' 'i mean i will be needing 3 water 2 firewood and 1 food' 'I can't give you that since it wouldn't be fair to me, I'll give you a better offer. I get 3 food 1 water 0 firewood and you get 0 Food 2 water and 3 firewood and 2 fire'
Utterance: 'no am not accepting that 2 water 2 firewood and 1 food'
answer:

No


