TASK DEFINITION: Generate the answer for a given question. The question requires common knowledge of English. Make sure that the answer is in detail, long, consistent with the context, and requires general knowledge of English. To be less repetitive, please vary your language for each question. Give a proper explanation to answer, and if necessary, provide the definition of various terms. And conclude your answer if it's long. If you have used other resources (e.g., Merriam Webster's.) to answer the question, include citations in your answer. You don't need to paraphrase the context of your resources, but make sure that your answer is consistent and complete.
PROBLEM: Is there a word to describe an object that excels in form and function? I am trying to avoid very general words like great, superb or excellent.

SOLUTION: Could it be described as an elegant solution or an engineering marvel?

PROBLEM: I am looking for a single adjective to describe someone who is easily discouraged. Example: Any person who is (easily discouraged) will not get far in life.

SOLUTION: Someone who is pusillanimous is one that lacks courage or strength of purpose. pusillanimous, adj. 1. Of a person: lacking in courage or strength of purpose; faint-hearted, craven, cowardly. (OED) If you want to include an element of reproach in your description you could call them a coward. coward, adj. 1. A reproachful designation for one who displays ignoble fear or want of courage in the face of danger, pain, or difficulty; an ignobly faint-hearted or pusillanimous person. (OED)

PROBLEM: You won't catch the train if you don't leave in time You won't catch the train if you won't leave in time I'm pretty sure the correct version is 'You won't catch the train if you don't leave in time', but I'm trying to explain it to someone and I don't know how to explain it. I also don't know how to google it. Can you please help me with a simple explanation or a link that explains it?.

SOLUTION:
As implied in the comments, the specific meaning of the two are slightly different (albeit both grammatically correct). It helps to break down the contractions. You will not catch the train if you do not leave on time This phrase is neutral in its blame: not catching the train will happen if you, for whatever reason, do not leave on time. You will not catch the train if you will not leave on time This places blame more directly on addressee: 'will not' implies that the addressee plays a causal role in themselves being late for the train, as if they refuse to leave at the correct time.

