Sentences: 1. Such a ban would be limited such as being only preventing advertising aimed at children rather than an outright attempt to stop children from seeing adverts .
2. Companies could therefore still advertise their children 's products if they aim their adverts at the parents rather than the children .
3. Alternatively the ban could be preventing advertising at times when children are most likely to be watching the television as has happened in Sweden .
4. There is a good precedent for banning advertising aimed at children in the restrictions placed in most countries upon advertising tobacco and alcohol .
5. It also takes a stand against increasingly exploitative marketing campaigns that ruthlessly target children .
6. In the USA marketing companies are already offering schools free televisions in exchange for their students being forced to watch a certain amount of programming and advertisements each day , and selling marketing data on those children .
7. It is time that childhood was protected from such commercialization .

What claim can be made from these sentences?
There is precedent for putting restrictions on advertising