Categorize the comment on the basis of toxicity. If the comment is toxic (harmful, malicious, derogatory, threat, insult, identity attck, etc.) output Yes, otherwise output No.

[Q]: You support Trump...an avowed racist. Why?
[A]: Yes


[Q]: "Residents take an active role in maintaining the camps, keeping order, fixing things that get broken, watching after one another and providing a much-needed sense of community and stability in their lives."  You mean like we all do in our daily life?  The volunteering is admirable, but not an indication of the success of programs.
[A]: No


[Q]: I agree with the writer's assessment of the sad state of current affairs.

Politics is a bloodsport.

Alaska Governor Bill Walker won with the support of the general population. He promoted a fiscal plan that fairly spread the pain of the fiscal crisis.  He wrote it in pencil. He solicited input.  He marched it around the state.  He got broad public support.  The cornerstone of his plan is fairness.  I know this first hand; I spoke to him about it myself.

Then, the Body, which created the fiscal mess, comes back with SB128- putting the fiscal burden on every man, woman, and CHILD in the state. PFD reform is not a good stand alone answer. The public will not abide a PFD raid; perceived or real!

To make matters worse, the Governor applauds the enemy when he needs to go right back for support to his strongest constituency, the general public and demand a better fiscal plan.

This constitutes a sad political strategy to shift the blame from the GOP, to the governor.

Paybacks are a bitch
[A]:
Yes


