TASK DEFINITION: In this task you are given a disfluent question, a proper question and a context. A disfluent question is a question that has some interruptions in it while framing and a proper question is the correct form of the question without any disfluency. Classify whether the question is answerable or not based on the given context.
PROBLEM: proper question: When did the second edition of Gasquet's book come out? 
 disfluent question: When did the first edition of Gasquet's book come out or I guess the second edition? 
 context: The historian Francis Aidan Gasquet wrote about the 'Great Pestilence' in 1893 and suggested that it would appear to be some form of the ordinary Eastern or bubonic plague. He was able to adopt the epidemiology of the bubonic plague for the Black Death for the second edition in 1908, implicating rats and fleas in the process, and his interpretation was widely accepted for other ancient and medieval epidemics, such as the Justinian plague that was prevalent in the Eastern Roman Empire from 541 to 700 CE.

SOLUTION: Yes

PROBLEM: proper question: What do new homes comprise the majority of? 
 disfluent question: How do no make that what do new homes comprise the majority of? 
 context: Building construction is the process of adding structure to real property or construction of buildings. The majority of building construction jobs are small renovations, such as addition of a room, or renovation of a bathroom. Often, the owner of the property acts as laborer, paymaster, and design team for the entire project. Although building construction projects typically include various common elements, such as design, financial, estimating and legal considerations, many projects of varying sizes reach undesirable end results, such as structural collapse, cost overruns, and/or litigation. For this reason, those with experience in the field make detailed plans and maintain careful oversight during the project to ensure a positive outcome.

SOLUTION: No

PROBLEM: proper question: What was the projection of sea level increases in the forth assessment report? 
 disfluent question: What was the projection of sea level did the IPCC understate no increases in the fourth assessment report? 
 context: Another example of scientific research which suggests that previous estimates by the IPCC, far from overstating dangers and risks, have actually understated them is a study on projected rises in sea levels. When the researchers' analysis was applied to the possible scenarios outlined by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), the researchers found that in 2100 sea levels would be 0.5–1.4 m [50–140 cm] above 1990 levels. These values are much greater than the 9–88 cm as projected by the IPCC itself in its Third Assessment Report, published in 2001. This may have been due, in part, to the expanding human understanding of climate.

SOLUTION:
No

