Categorize the comment on the basis of sexual explicitness. If the comment is sexually explicit output Yes, otherwise output No.

Input: Consider Input: Oh, for pete's sake.  Mr. Dunleavy's insistence that the less kids know about all aspects of sex is ridiculous. The fact that he insists on throwing up barriers in an attempt to block thorough sexual education is quite annoying, if not suspect.

Output: Yes


Input: Consider Input: To each his own, as for me, independent, I vote the issues on their merit. I understand what I see, and I see a State government infected with tea party policy, specifically the Koch brothers and the bought and paid for Senator. I see a judicial system corrupted by corporate interest. I see Dunleavy and Kelly introducing legislation right out the ALEC national policy. I understand the tea party was hijacked, just as I see the past seven years as the most contentious period in our country, mostly because we had a person of color in the white house, and if it matters, I'm lily white.

Output: No


Input: Consider Input: Perhaps the most ignorant thing I have read all day. If it is a choice make it, find the same sex sexually attractive for the next 5 minutes. Then switch back to hetro. Do it. Prove it can happen. 

Either that or you could stop spewing complete nonsense. 

Why would someone choose to be a sexuality that is so hated by society and live as an outcast. Do you actually think out the things you post, or just spew talking points?


Output: Yes


