Given scene/plot descriptions from movies or TV shows, and given a specific question about the scene, summarize the question into a title
--------
Question: In the movie adaptation of The Count of Monte Cristo (2002), Edmond Dantès lands at Elba, kills some British soldiers and knowingly accepts a letter from Napoleon Bonaparte. Whereas in the book he doesn't accept the letter directly from Napoleon and has no reason to believe it has anything to do with Napoleon.  To me having this scene at Elba was unnecessary (in more ways than one), it makes it hard to believe that he was just naive and does the meaning of his betrayal by Mondego and Danglars.   To put it in a more modern context, had a terrorist leader passed him a letter which was said to contain a letter to family but actually contained plans for an attack, then Mondego and Danglars would be considered heroes and Edmond's quest for revenge would not be justified.  So, can Edmond Dantès really be considered innocent of treason?

Answer: Was Edmond Dantès Actually a Traitor?


Question: In Breaking Bad, Mike clearly calls Jimmy by his alternate name "Saul" multiple times. In Better Call Saul, we see that their paths are crossed quite considerably before Jimmy even starts using his alter ego of Saul Goodman.  Why does Mike entertain this alter ego name? He doesn't seem to be the type of guy who would do so, regardless of Jimmy's reasons for using it. It seems to be a bit of a plot hole (granted, it isn't a big one). I can see why someone would disagree with me on this point, but Gilligan's style is so careful and thought-out that it's surprising that something like this would be left unturned. Concepts of Better Call Saul were thought of well before Breaking Bad had finished airing, so I would've thought they had plenty of time to close any of these holes.

Answer: Why does Mike call Jimmy "Saul"?


Question: In the episode The Sign of Three (S03E02), Sherlock remembers that Tessa knew John's middlename and this is how he figures out the whole thing about the Mayfly Man and his attempt to assassinate one of the guests.   I didn't really understand the connection between him dating the women and attending the wedding. I mean, he was the photographer, so he did not need a date for the wedding. And if Tessa was not invited, but only saw the photographer's invitation, why would the killer need to date those women?  So, what was the purpose of dating the various women?

Answer:
Connection between the cases in "The Sign of Three"


