In this task, you will be presented with a context from an academic paper and a question separated with a 
. You have to answer the question based on the context.

[EX Q]: Our experiments are run using the English$\rightarrow $Italian/German portions of the MuST-C corpus BIBREF25, which is extracted from TED talks, using the same train/validation/test split as provided with the corpus (see Table TABREF18). As additional data, we use a mix of public and proprietary data for about 16 million sentence pairs for English-Italian (En-It) and $4.4$ million WMT14 sentence pairs for the English-German (En-De). 
 Question: What dataset do they use?
[EX A]: English$\rightarrow $Italian/German portions of the MuST-C corpus As additional data, we use a mix of public and proprietary data for about 16 million sentence pairs for English-Italian (En-It) and $4.4$ million WMT14 sentence pairs for the English-German (En-De)

[EX Q]: Results show that the CJFA encoder obtains significantly better phone classification accuracy than the VAE baseline and also than the CJFS encoder. These results are replicated for speaker recognition tasks. 
 Question: Which approach out of two proposed in the paper performed better in experiments?
[EX A]: CJFA encoder 

[EX Q]: To test the effectiveness of this new architecture in forecasting derailment of online conversations, we develop and distribute two new datasets. The first triples in size the highly curated `Conversations Gone Awry' dataset BIBREF9, where civil-starting Wikipedia Talk Page conversations are crowd-labeled according to whether they eventually lead to personal attacks; the second relies on in-the-wild moderation of the popular subreddit ChangeMyView, where the aim is to forecast whether a discussion will later be subject to moderator action due to “rude or hostile” behavior.  
 Question: What are two datasets model is applied to?
[EX A]:
 `Conversations Gone Awry' dataset subreddit ChangeMyView

