Teacher: Generate an appropriate title for the given text. The generated title must be short and include the main topic of the text. The preferred titles are under fifteen words.
Teacher: Now, understand the problem? If you are still confused, see the following example:
But Eluned Morgan conceded that it would be "difficult for us to stop" from a legal point of view. Her comments were criticised by a Labour AM. Alun Davies said threatening legal action "sounds like the last breath before you're thrown out of the pub". Mr Davies said he was not convinced the Welsh Government would "have a leg to stand on" in trying to shape international trade deals after Brexit. Following Donald Trump's comments during last week's trade visit that the NHS would be "on the table" in any future trade talks between the UK and the USA, Eluned Morgan said there was "absolutely no prospect whatsoever of us allowing the Welsh NHS to be part of any negotiation." The US President then rowed back on his initial comments following criticism from a number of MPs. Asked about her response to President Trump's remarks as she gave evidence to the Assembly's Brexit committee on Monday, Ms Morgan said "legally, it would be difficult for us to stop because we don't have a veto over trade". "Politically, I think it's extremely unlikely to happen," the international relations and the Welsh language minister said. "They [the UK Government] should not be concluding any trade agreements without consulting us where we have the power." Ms Morgan explained that UK and Welsh government officials are working on an agreement or 'concordat' for how future trade deals are negotiated. During a robust exchange, the Labour AM Alun Davies said: "I want something which is in law to which I can hold you to account and which colleagues in Westminster can hold the UK Government to account. "The argument we'll make life difficult for them, it sounds alright on the street, but it's not the reality of intergovernmental relations." "The United Kingdom has to find a way of functioning. "At the moment, your answers aren't giving me any confidence that there is that structure in place because, if the Welsh Government's argument is, 'we'll see you in court', it's not a very impressive argument either for the continuation of the structure of United Kingdom as a state or the commitment of the government within the United Kingdom to actually work together," he added. Responding to the criticism, Ms Morgan said: "Is the current intergovernmental structure adequate? "Absolutely not... and it's not just in relation to trade, it's in relation to almost every aspect of government policy. So, that infrastructure needs to be built."
Solution: NHS Wales: Court action if trade deals affect service?
Reason: The output phrase is the appropriate title for the given text and it highlights the essence of the passage.

Now, solve this instance: By Sean CoughlanBBC News education correspondent Schools claim pupil premium cash based on numbers eligible for free meals. But when all pupils starting school will be entitled to free meals, there will be less incentive for parents to come forward for means-testing. Head teachers want this information to be gathered centrally. It is understood that heads' leaders are to meet ministers to discuss their fears. A Department for Education spokeswoman said: "Schools will continue to receive pupil premium funding on the same basis as now." Wide variations The National Association of Head Teachers is concerned that schools might lose funding as an unintended consequence of introducing free school meals for the first three years of primary school. Pupil premium funding is intended to help provide more support for children from poorer families, with primary schools currently claiming £953 per year for each eligible child. This is expected to rise to £1,300 per pupil next year. But payment is based on whether children are eligible for free school meals and if families do not register to claim, the school does not get the money. Head teachers are concerned that from September, when all pupils in the first three years can have a free meal, it will be much harder to get eligible families to come forward to show they are poor enough to qualify. Head teachers want data to be shared between government departments, so that pupil premium funding will not depend on gathering information at the level of individual schools. At present, when parents have the incentive of free school meals, there are already wide variations in the level of claiming eligibility. Not claiming According to Department for Education figures, across England an average of 11% of families entitled to free meals do not claim them - which means that their schools do not receive the pupil premium funding. But in Bracknell Forest this level rises to 38% of entitled families not claiming, 29% do not claim in Surrey and 22% in Essex. The highest levels of claiming are in the North East and in inner London, where some boroughs claim 100% take-up rates. Among the reasons suggested for not claiming has been embarrassment at having to come forward for means-testing. The eligibility criteria for free school meals include families claiming jobseekers' allowance, income-related employment and support allowance and those receiving child tax credit and with an income less than £16,190 per year. The NAHT says there have been successful projects in areas piloting free meals where extra efforts have been made by local authorities to make sure parents continue to register their eligibility for free school meals. A Department for Education spokeswoman said that in places which had already introduced such free meals for all pupils there had been an increase in registration. "There is no reason why this should not be repeated across the country," she said. "There will continue to be a very strong incentive for parents to sign up - at £1,300 per child the pupil premium will mean significant extra support for their child. Schools also have a very strong incentive to identify eligible parents."
Student:
Free school meals threat to poor pupil funds, say heads