Question:
Summarize the argument implied by these sentences. 1. Our commitment to transparency means surrendering part of our autonomy for the collective .
2. Democracies rely on transparency .
3. I do not have a right to know everything about the local football club -LRB- if I dont play football and they are not a public company their decisions dont affect me -RRB- .
4. This does not mean that our autonomy does not still belong to us ; the institutions that affect our lives are under a constant obligation to justify their decisions and existence in relation to us .
5. Therefore they are to be considered a power in society , and the principle of transparency must be extended to them .
6. Think tanks , however , are highly influential , and directly affect the society in which we live : some have , for example , lobbied successfully against action to prevent global warming .
7. The educational charities that do PR for the rightwing ultra-rich , Comment is Free , The Guardian .
8. Monbiot , George .
9. 18 February 2013 ,
Answer:
People have a right to know where their information comes from

Question:
Summarize the argument implied by these sentences. 1. Cleaver , Olivia F. , Women Who Defy Social Norms : Female Refugees Who Flee Islamic States and Their Fight to Fit into American Immigration Law , , Women for Refugee Women , Refused : the experiences of women denied asylum in the UK , refugeewomen.com , 2012 , The United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees , Convention and Protocol relating to the status of refugees , , 1951 , p. 14
2. Under the current legal system , the problems of women from countries that implement Sharia Law and other forms of discrimination are often not considered sufficient grounds for asylum .
3. Sometimes , women who are persecuted by their government end up running from their country just to be sent back from the EU when their asylum application is rejected .
4. The consequences can be of two kinds .
5. This is because refugees are only considered to be refugees owing to well-founded fear of being persecuted for reasons of race , religion , nationality , membership of a particular social group or political opinion , so it does not include persecution for gender .
6. This was the case with two women who applied for asylum in Great Britain in 1997 and were denied this right even though they faced death by stoning upon return .
7. The first and the worst is sending them back home where to face harsh punishment for trying to leave .
8. Those who are denied entry are left with nothing only a long depressing wait to be returned to the horrible conditions from which they thought they had escaped .
9. Even if the women are not sent home immediately due to a prolonged appeals process they are left in detention centers , in uncomfortable conditions and unable to get a job or do anything while they wait .
Answer:
The status quo involves sending women back to the threat of persecution

Question:
Summarize the argument implied by these sentences. 1. Moreover , the level of enjoyment that individuals derive from their jobs - and thus the nature of the hedonic calculus that they engage in when determining whether a particular job will fully account for their needs - is linked partly to the variety and difficulty of the tasks they must accomplish .
2. Law represents a sustained and engaging intellectual challenge , and a challenge ideally suited to the skills of most humanities graduates .
3. Law Schools teaches you to think more critically , and legal work offers the opportunity to engage in a largely intellectual pursuit with other highly intellectual individuals .
4. Law students are likely to develop a wider range of intellectual skills throughout their careers , and will be better able to transition in to different jobs and different areas of the legal industry if needed .
Answer:

Law school helps graduates to think more clearly making them more attractive to other employers.