Imagine the conversation that came before this response? Response: However, Benson "et al."
CONVERSATION:Conversation:
 P1) What was the species Pliosaurus carpenteri?
 P2) (2012) and Knutsen (2012), but was reassigned to its own species "P. westburyensis" by Benson "et al." (2013). "P. carpenteri" is known solely from the holotype BRSMG Cd6172, a nearly complete 1.8-m-long skull, mandible and postcranial skeleton, including at least 17 complete vertebrae housed at Bristol City Museum and Art Gallery, Bristol, England.
 P1) Where was it found?
 P2) The specimen was collected at the Westbury Clay pit, Wiltshire, from subdivision E4 of the "Aulacostephanus eudoxus" ammonite zone, seven metres below the Crussoliceras Limestone of the Kimmeridge Clay Formation, dating to the late Kimmeridgian.
 P1) When was it discovered?
 P2) Nicknamed "Westbury pliosaur II", it was first described by Sassoon "et al." (2012) who, together with Knutsen (2012), assigned it tentatively to "Pliosaurus sp.". It was reassigned to its own species by Roger B. J. Benson, Mark Evans, Adam S. Smith, Judyth Sassoon, Scott Moore-Faye, Hilary F. Ketchum and Richard Forrest in 2013.
 P1) Are there any other interesting aspects about this article?
 P2) The specific name honors Simon Carpenter, the discoverer and collector of BRSMG Cd6172. Sassoon "et al." (2012) originally ascribed the differences between BRSMG Cc332 (the holotype of "P. westburyensis") and BRSMG Cd6172 to intraspecific variation, with these specimens possibly being sexual dimorphs, due to fact that both were collected from close stratigraphic levels of the same quarry.
 P1) What did they do next?
 P2) 