Justice Ginsburg, we have no quarrel with the objective of harmonization fitting within the "promote the progress of science" understanding subject to constitutional limitations. If France adopted a rule that said you couldn't grant copyrights to hate speech, we could not harmonize with that rule consistent with our First Amendment and similarly, as Mary Beth Peters testified before Congress, ours is the only Constitution that has an express limitation on terms.

Choose your answer: based on the paragraph above can we conclude that "France does not have a constitution"?

Select from: (i) Yes. (ii) It's impossible to say. (iii) No.
I think the answer is
(ii)