We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

Q: 3 - Inequities in representation (meaning if you have the money you can afford a team of good lawyers so it's generally only the poor who see the chair)

A: Valid
****
Q: If we focused on the death penalty in the trial, we wouldn't have those costs.

A: Valid
****
Q: It's pathetic, really, since at the same time you will attempt to take some imaginary moral high road as you argue against the death penalty for legally convicted murderers who acted with malice and premeditation.

A:
Valid
****
