We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Death Penalty) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of death penalty. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of death penalty.

Input: Consider Input: The non-repeat offenders are typically people who committed much smaller crimes that would never be worthy of the death penalty in the first place.

Output: Valid


Input: Consider Input: I trust the jury, and the trial / appeals process that we use prior to execution (although the appeals process needs some streamlining).

Output: Valid


Input: Consider Input: There is a higher quality of prosecution and defense in these cases and new death penalty law, which began after Furman v Georgia (1972), is more settled than it had been from 1973-1987.


Output: Valid


