Given the task definition and input, reply with output. In this task, you will be presented with a passage and have to answer a question based on your understanding of the events inferred from the passage. Among the entities, try to find the best entity that is most likely to fill in "_" and classify the answers based on options.

(CNN) In the 1971 free speech case, Cohen v. California, the Supreme Court said, "One man's vulgarity is another's lyric." That rings very true today. In 2015, I wrote an article with the headline "Decision on Asian-American band's name is wrong." That was after an early decision by the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit that denied the rock band, The Slants, a trademark registration because a bureaucrat said that it was "disparaging." Section 2(a) of the trademark act lets the government deny trademark protection to a mark that is "immoral," "scandalous" or "disparaging." I wrote a similar article about a case involving the Washington Redskins.Marc Randazza: Justices made the correct decision when declaring Section 2(a) of the trademark act unconstitutionalThe decision lets the band The Slants register its trademark, protects Americans' First Amendment free speech rights 
 Questions:The _ has made an inspiring decision in The Slants case in that it protects all of our rights -- not just the rights of an eminently likable rock band and a somewhat less-than beloved football team. (A) CNN (B) Cohen (C) California (D) Supreme Court (E) Asian (F) American (G) US Court of Appeals (H) Federal Circuit (I) The Slants (J) Section 2(a (K) Washington Redskins (L) Marc Randazza (M) Justices (N) Americans (O) First Amendment

(D)