In this task, you are given a text of many news articles seperated by special token "|||||". Your task is to summarize them.
Q: They recruited 18 infants and their mothers. Seven of the infants were vaginal deliveries, and 11 were born by scheduled C-section. Four of the C-section babies were exposed to their mother's vaginal fluids within the first two minutes after birth. To do that, the researchers swiped the babies' mouths, face and skin with a piece of sterile gauze that had been "incubating" in the mother's vagina for one hour before the birth. ||||| Photo 
  
 The first germs to colonize a newborn delivered vaginally come almost exclusively from its mother. But the first to reach an infant born by cesarean section come mostly from the environment â€” particularly bacteria from inaccessible or less-scrubbed areas like lamps and walls, and skin cells from everyone else in the delivery room. 
  
 Photo 
  
 That difference, some experts believe, could influence a childâ€™s lifelong health. Now, in the first study of its kind, researchers on Monday confirmed that a motherâ€™s beneficial microbes can be transferred, at least partially, from her vagina to her baby after a C-section. 
  
 The small proof-of-principle study suggests a new way to inoculate babies, said Dr. Maria Gloria Dominguez-Bello, an associate professor of medicine at New York University and lead author of the report, published on Monday in Nature Medicine. 
  
 â€œThe study is extremely important,â€? said Dr. Jack Gilbert, a microbial ecologist at Argonne National Laboratory who did not take part in the work. â€œJust understanding that itâ€™s possible is exciting.â€? 
  
 But it will take further studies following C-section babies for many years to know to what degree, if any, the method protects them from immune and metabolic problems, he said. 
  
 Some epidemiological studies have suggested that C-section babies may have an elevated risk for developing immune and metabolic disorders, including Type 1 diabetes, allergies, asthma and obesity. 
  
 Scientists have theorized that these children may be missing key bacteria known to play a large role in shaping the immune system from the moment of birth onward. To replace these microbes, some parents have turned to a novel procedure called vaginal microbial transfer. 
  
 A motherâ€™s vaginal fluids â€” loaded with one such essential bacterium, lactobacillus, that helps digest human milk â€” are collected before surgery and swabbed all over the infant a minute or two after birth. 
  
 An infantâ€™s first exposure to microbes may educate the early immune system to recognize friend from foe, Dr. Dominguez-Bello said. 
  
 Friendly bacteria, like lactobacilli, are tolerated as being like oneself. Those from hospital ventilation vents or the like may be perceived as enemies and be attacked. 
  
 These early microbial interactions may help set up an immune system that recognizes â€œselfâ€? from â€œnon-selfâ€? for the rest of a personâ€™s life, Dr. Dominguez-Bello said. 
  
 In the United States, about one in three babies are delivered by C-section, a rate that has risen dramatically in recent decades. Some hospitals perform the surgery on nearly seven in ten women delivering babies. 
  
 An ideal C-section rate for low-risk births should be no more than 15 percent, according to the World Health Organization. 
  
 Dr. Dominguez-Belloâ€™s study involved 18 babies born at the University of Puerto Rico hospital in San Juan, where she recently worked. Seven were born vaginally and 11 by elective C-section. Of the latter, four were swabbed with the motherâ€™s vaginal microbes and seven were not. 
  
 Microbes were collected on a folded sterile piece of gauze that was dipped in a saline solution and inserted into each motherâ€™s vagina for one hour before surgery. As the operations began, the gauze was pulled out and placed in a sterile collector. 
  
 One to two minutes after the babies were delivered and put under a neonatal lamp, researchers swabbed each infantâ€™s lips, face, chest, arms, legs, back, genitals and anal region with the damp gauze. The procedure took 15 seconds. 
  
 Dr. Dominguez-Bello and her colleagues then tracked the composition of microbes by taking more than 1,500 oral, skin and anal samples from the newborns, as well as vaginal samples from the mothers, over the first month after birth. 
  
 For the first few days, ambient skin bacteria from the delivery room predominated in the mouths and on the skin of C-section babies who were not swabbed, Dr. Dominguez-Bello said. 
  
 But in terms of their bacterial colonies, the infants swabbed with the microbes closely resembled vaginally delivered babies, she found, especially in the first week of life. They were all covered with lactobacilli. 
  
 Gut bacteria in both C-section groups, however, were less abundant than that found in the vaginally delivered babies. 
  
 Anal samples from the swabbed group, oddly, contained the highest abundance of bacteria usually found in the mouth. 
  
 The results show the complexity of labor, said Dr. Alexander Khoruts, a microbial expert and associate professor of medicine at the University of Minnesota. â€œIt cannot be simplified to a neat, effortless passage of the infant through the birth canal,â€? he said. 
  
 As the month progressed, the oral and skin microbes of all infants began to resemble normal adult patterns, Dr. Dominguez-Bello said. But fecal bacteria did not, probably because of breast or formula feeding and the absence of solid foods. 
  
 The transfer fell short of full vaginal birth-like colonization for two reasons, Dr. Dominguez-Bello said. Compared to infants who spent time squeezed inside the birth canal, those who were swabbed got less exposure to their motherâ€™s microbes. 
  
 And all infants delivered by C-section were exposed to antibiotics, which also may have reduced the number and variety of bacteria colonizing them. 
  
 A larger study of vaginal microbial transfer is underway at N.Y.U., Dr. Dominguez-Bello said. Eighty-four mothers have participated so far. 
  
 Infants delivered both by C-section and vaginally will be followed for one year to look for differences in the treated and untreated groups and to look for complications. Thus far the swabbing has proved entirely safe. 
  
 The procedure is not yet recommended by professional medical societies, said Dr. Sara Brubaker, a specialist in maternal and fetal medicine at N.Y.U. Until more is known, physicians are hesitant to participate. 
  
 â€œBut it has hit the lay press,â€? she said. â€œPatients come in and ask for it. They are doing it themselves.â€? 
  
 Dr. Brubaker is one of them. When her daughter was born three and a half months ago, she arranged to have her baby swabbed. 
  
 Related: 
  
 For more fitness, food and wellness news, follow us on Facebook and Twitter, or sign up for our newsletter. |||||
A: 
Babies born via Cesarean section have a different microbiome than infants delivered naturally: For having skipped that trip down the birth canal, C-section babies lack bacteria that help the immune system recognize and accept other beneficial microbes; they may also be at an increased risk for obesity, asthma, allergies, and autism. "What we don't know is if the reason the risk is greater is because of the difference in the microbiome," UC San Diego scientist Rob Knight tells the Los Angeles Times. Knight and his team may have found a way to eliminate the risks with a simple swipe. First, they recruited 18 babies and their mothers. Next, immediately after birth, they swiped four C-section babies with gauze held in the mother's vagina. Over the next month, the microbiome of the four infants was found to be more similar to that of babies delivered vaginally than other C-section babies. They weren't identical, though. "For some taxa the transfer was essentially complete, but other taxa didn't really take," Knight says. A gastroenterologist not involved in the study tells Smithsonian that the babies' gut microbes "look much more like a C-section baby's than a vaginal birth baby's." Knight admits it's not clear how the transfer might affect the long-term health of the C-section babies, but an expert tells the New York Times the study is "extremely important" for the sole fact that it shows such a transfer is possible. Knight and his team are now planning a larger study that will follow a greater number of babies for a longer period. In the meantime, they warn that the mothers who took part in the study underwent "a number of tests to make sure it is a safe procedure … The take-home message would be don't do this at home." (C-sections are rampant in this country.)