We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

[EX Q]: 35) Private citizens don't need a gun for self-protection because the police are there to protect them even though the Supreme Court says the police are not responsible for their protection.
[EX A]: Valid

[EX Q]: The ATF is trying to single out gun manufactures to be responsible for policing customers.
[EX A]: Valid

[EX Q]: Interesting how some people insist that the RKBA is not limited by the militia, but here you let "arms" in the second amendment be limited according to the militia.
[EX A]:
Valid

