We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

It evolved into a discussion about how a violent encounter was (by some) preferable to be entered with fists rather than guns, as it would be less dangerous.
Valid

Can you point to the last time a private individual was successfully prosecuted either in legal or civil court for the recognized offense of having violated the constitutional rights of another private individual?
Valid

Rossi and Wright did a prison survey and found almost 3/4ths of the criminals feared citizens with guns more than the cops.

Valid

