We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gay Marriage) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gay marriage. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gay marriage.

[EX Q]: And since they claim HIV/AIDS is a consequence of being gay, do they want  to increase the risk of infection for straight women by insisting that such women be the only marriage partners gay men are allowed to have?
[EX A]: Valid

[EX Q]: While on an evolutionary level homosexuality makes little sense, it really does not make sense that a government should have the right to make gay people subcitizens.
[EX A]: Valid

[EX Q]: I wonder if they've also given up wearing their seatbelt since some people don't wear them and therefore "divorce" themselves from the wearing of their seatbelt . . . . :p
[EX A]:
Invalid

