Given the task definition, example input & output, solve the new input case.
The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the no-need strategy, otherwise output No. no-need is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used when a participant points out that they do not need an item based on personal context such as suggesting that they have ample water to spare. no-need can directly benefit the opponent since it implies that the item is up for grabs.
Example: Context: 
Utterance: 'how about I give you 2 waters and 1 food package in exchange for all your firewood?'
Output: No
The utterance does not use the no-need strategy since it never refers to an item that the participant does not need.

New input case for you: Context: 'I was thinking maybe I could have a majority of the fire food and you can have a majority of the water and food. ' 'What exactly do you mean by majority? As in everything ?' 'I was more thinking 2 Firewood for me , 1 food and 1 water? The rest would be yours.'
Utterance: 'That is a promising bargain but I want at least 2 firewood, it makes for a fun time for my group.'
Output:
No