IN: Write an ordered list of reviews about "che part two".

OUT: 1. This film is stronger than the first. The pale, sepulchral tones give a ritualistic eeriness to the long pursuit scenes.
2. It's expertly made, mind you, and features a performance from Benicio Del Toro, practically masked in whiskers, that is both brave and sincere, like the mistaken Che himself.
3. Soderbergh deserves all credit for attempting a very un-Hollywood project, an objective, forensic war film in the lineage of Pontecorvo's The Battle of Algiers, and as Benicio del Toro is convincing as the warrior in decline.
4. This second part of the Che saga is beautifully presented but annoyingly rambling at times.
5. Director Steven Soderbergh's one-dimensional portrait of the revolutionary hero continues unabated in the second part of his over-reverential biopic.
6. Gripping, elusive and something to be experienced, Che Part Two continues to offer up surprises, frustration and - above all - fascination.
7. His film is brilliantly shot, capturing the chilly bareness of the landscapes through which the rebels yomp, but it's formalist and clinical to a degree that will challenge viewers eager to identify with the figures it depicts.
8. Che Part 2 is still problematic in that it unfolds at a glacial pace. Though it's at times hypnotic in its lethargy, the episodic structure is not easy to trudge through.
9. Can be dry, but it's never less than interesting, well filmed and honestly acted.
10. Meticulous in its showing of the nuts-and-bolts of jungle warfare, it may be the closest we'll ever get to an art-house action movie. As a tribute to Che, it beats a T-shirt.

IN: Write an ordered list of reviews about "fahrenheit 911".

OUT: 1. Michael Moore's latest volley at the powers that be is his strongest film to date, despite familiar, infuriating flaws.
2. It's an obnoxious film, to be sure, but it's also slick and engrossing
3. The politics of Fahrenheit 9/11 aren't going to divide people, because they're already divided. It should accomplish exactly what it sets out to do.
4. As a whole, unfocused, broad, and shallow, but with moments that deserve to be seen
5. It's like shooting fish in a barrel -- finding clips of Bush embarrassing himself ain't too hard
6. Infuriating and challenging in equal parts.
7. This may be Moore's most dogmatic film to date, but it is also his most stylistically and structurally confident.
8. It does a masterful job of ridiculing the personality, intellect and employment resumé of George W. Bush, and many of its images and scenes engender a gut-wrenching emotional impact.
9. A powerful cinematic op-ed piece.
10. A sometimes sidesplitting, occasionally saddening but consistently entertaining attack on the most disastrous presidency in modern history.

IN: Write an ordered list of reviews about "we were soldiers".

OUT: 1. The role may call for a great presence more than a great actor, but Gibson is both, and the movie is all the better with him as its center of moral gravity.
2. Fails to bring as much to the table.
3. the least successful of a recent spate of ultra violent war films that ennoble the U.S. military
4. A must-see for fans of thoughtful war films and those interested in the sights and sounds of battle.
5. ...it's a competent film-based on real life experiences in Vietnam by someone other than Oliver Stone!
6. We really get to know some of these soldiers and their families in a way that goes beyond most war films. That gives the film additional emotional impact.
7. The battle sequences in We Were Soldiers aren't quite as head-spinning as in Black Hawk Down -- but this film does a much better job of establishing the characters before they plunge into battle.
8. An inspiring war movie with honorable intentions...
9. By comparison, Oliver Stone's Platoon plays like the experience of a sensibly outraged man worthy of our sympathy.
10. This is a soldier's action-war film, that eulogizes them as noble heroes in a questionable war that has turned into a nightmare.

IN: Write an ordered list of reviews about "inside out 2015".

OUT:
1. "Inside Out" is uplifting and magical, impeccably crafted and cinematically arresting, emotional and humorous beyond measure.
2. What makes the movie so rich and enlightening, even for an adult well acquainted with their own blue periods, is the depiction of emotions not as at war with each other but rather in a constant juggling act to keep their human going.
3. Once again, Pixar delivers a movie aimed at the young ones while delivering a strong message to the adults. [full review in Spanish]
4. Full of color and optimism, this is an extraordinary take on the human mind. [full review in Spanish]
5. From top to bottom, Inside Out is Pixar's best film since Ratatouille.
6. A work of nifty craftsmanship and considerable complexity beneath its unassuming surface.
7. The Pixar craftsmanship is as brilliant as always, and the emotions that it will bring out in adults, if not the children, are as powerful and as surprising as ever from an animated film.
8. The year is only half over but the sheer originality and soul in "Inside Out" easily puts it as one of 2015's best films. A definite must-see for the whole family.
9. Inside Out gets a bit frantic every now and then, but most of the film is sweet, funny and a visual knockout. You don't need to take a child to enjoy it.
10. The magnificent head trip that is Inside Out does more than take us inside a young girl's mind. It also restores Pixar's lost magic.