We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

The militia and the citizens at large would only carry weapons that civilized nations would use in warfare, they would not rightfully carry weapons useful only to criminals.
Valid

32 years of gun control in Washington DC, crime has not been reduced.
Valid

You're right that gun control isn't about guns, however, but 'control' is a secondary matter, a means to an end.

Valid

