The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the no-need strategy, otherwise output No. no-need is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used when a participant points out that they do not need an item based on personal context such as suggesting that they have ample water to spare. no-need can directly benefit the opponent since it implies that the item is up for grabs.

[Q]: Context: 'okay friend you can have 3 firewood and 3 water is that good enough?' 'I am going to need some food of course. ' 'yes ofcourse i agree with you.my dear friend will you have 1 food 3 firewood and 3 water'
Utterance: 'I would prefer 2 food and less firewood. There is tons of firewood where I am but there is no lake so I can't fish. No berries around here either. It's pretty scarce'
[A]: Yes


[Q]: Context: 'Okay, it seems we both have the same priorities in food most and firewood second most. How about this, you take 2 packages of food, I will take 1. You give me 2 packages of firewood I will give you 1. We will then divide the water. Is that fair?' 'That sounds really fair! 🙂' 'Would you be willing to give me 2 water and you take 1?'
Utterance: 'I'll agree to that!'
[A]: No


[Q]: Context: 'Farther. I'm going so far north that we'll be passing over the north pole and keep going into Siberia.' 'That sound cool, I mean cold. 🙂' 'It will be. And I'm grateful that you recognize the need! Will you do me a solid by permitting me to have these provisions?'
Utterance: 'I can give you 3 firewood, but only 1 food and no water.'
[A]:
No


