The input is taken from a negotiation between two participants who take the role of campsite neighbors and negotiate for Food, Water, and Firewood packages, based on their individual preferences and requirements. Given an utterance and recent dialogue context containing past 3 utterances (wherever available), output Yes if the utterance contains the no-need strategy, otherwise output No. no-need is a cooperative negotiation strategy. It is used when a participant points out that they do not need an item based on personal context such as suggesting that they have ample water to spare. no-need can directly benefit the opponent since it implies that the item is up for grabs.

Example Input: Context: 'Hello there.  I am excited about this camping trip!'
Utterance: 'I'm also excited, I love the outdoors!'
Example Output: No

Example Input: Context: 'Hey there how are you?' 'I am fine friend. I need a lot of firewood though. It is freezing' 'I definitely need firewood as well. We didn't anticipate it being as freezing cold as it is at night. There isn't much around us. We've also been using a lot of water, which we could use more of since we've been looking for firewood.'
Utterance: 'Your needs are like mine. I have a condition that require  me to shower quite often. It is a shame but if I do not shower for 3 hours I will stink.  '
Example Output: No

Example Input: Context: 'Well I think we can make a good deal then.  How many packages of food would you want?' 'Could we each do 3 of what we need the most? I get three food and you get three water? How do you propose splitting up the firewood?' 'We can do the 3 for 3 trade.  That works perfectly!  Its' going to be cold at night where I'm going.  What's it like where you're heading?'
Utterance: 'It's going to be pretty warm where I'm going, but it's also variable. How do you feel about you get 2 wood and I get 1?'
Example Output:
Yes

