Q: 1. Even though I'm pretty much vampired out these days, I appreciated the grossout thrills and the B-movie dialogue.
2. It's a shame Australia's Spierig Brothers opt to turn it into just any old noir-future chase movie - roughly Blade meets Minority Report, without the production flair.
3. It's big and brash, but were it not for Weta's visionary special effects work, there would be little to keep the blood pumping.
4. A gripping feature that is just as likely to provoke thought as it is fear.
5. Daybreakers isn't exactly good or bad, and that is the problem. The film could have broken the rules and expounded upon its initial ingenuity. It could have been about something. It's not.
6. Daybreakers is an entertaining genre hybrid with functioning brain cells and, in its exciting finale, an original solution to solving its vampire epidemic.
7. A polished, intelligent, well-acted and darkly humourous vampire tale. Fangtastic.
8. Iffy plotting, squiffy dialogue and directorial indecision - is this po-faced science fiction or hokey horror? - leave the film, like its protagonist, torn between two extremes.
9. With beautiful Blade Runner-style cityscapes, smartly conceived takes on the vampire mythos (sun-proofed cars and video mirrors), inventively engineered shocks and copious blood loss, this is an engagingly skilful blend.
10. Daybreakers takes the undead in an entirely different direction, melding smart sci-fi with a timely political subtext.
Based on these individual reviews, what is the critic consensus?

A: Consensus: Though it arrives during an unfortunate glut of vampire movies, Daybreakers offers enough dark sci-fi thrills -- and enough of a unique twist on the genre -- to satisfy filmgoers.
1. [Subject Kimberly] Roberts' vid reps some of the more extensive by any Katrina survivor.
2. No unnecessary authorial pushing and prodding is required on behalf of Kim and Scott's amazing story.
3. A riveting documentary about some impoverished African-American survivors of Hurricane Katrina.
4. Trouble the Water reveals not only the terrors of the hurricane but also the political and personal valences of its legendary mismanagement.
5. Trouble the Water proves that a couple of gutsy amateurs with a home video camera can work wonders.
6. By picking up on this personal story and serving it up in a way that plays commentator, not critic, the filmmakers allows Kim and Scott to speak for themselves. The results are astoundingly brutal and beautifully honest.
7. Trouble the Water is so hopeful and full of life that it would be a shame if it were dismissed as just another Hurricane Katrina documentary.
8. Roberts needs more practice at holding the camera steady and framing shots. It doesn't matter. We feel her footage at the base of our spines.
9. The Roberts family, constantly helping others, maintains both a realistic and positive perspective on their situation, with Kimberly in particular showing remarkable resilience.
10. A great film about a national disgrace and some remarkable 'regular folks' who refused to let it overwhelm them.
Consensus: This incredible documentary displays the tragedy and mismanagement of Katrina along with the heroism of strangers and survivors.
Q: 1. one of the most underseen guy movies ever
2. Weird and smoothly engaging. Harrison Ford does some great (non-hero) work here.
3. Harrison Ford gives one of his best performances in this underrated film.
4. It's easy to forget how well Harrison Ford can play an unlikable character.
5. It's a testament to Ford's talent that we actually care what happens to him, because in a lesser actor's hands, we'd be hoping that some cannibalistic natives would eat him.
6. Meandering film that doesn't really seem to know where it's going or what it is.
7. Examines the consequences of a father's egotism on his family.
8. A stretch for Ford, but worth it. Unique and fascinating character study.
Based on these individual reviews, what is the critic consensus?

A: Consensus: Harrison Ford capably tackles a tough, unlikable role, producing a fascinating and strange character study.
1. simultaneously hilarious and chilling
2. To Be or Not to Be's wit continues to be overshadowed by its touchy plot.
3. Jack Benny's best, a fun WWII comedy directed by Lubitsch. And it has Lombard.
4. The famed "Lubitsch touch," whatever it really was, was never put to a more formidable test the last hour is satiric perfection.
5. A masterpiece. ... Hurtling forward with its dizzying blend of laughs and intrigue, the movie's blessed with a script that's jam-packed with memorable quips (some laced with naughty double entendres), with most of the best ones handed over to Benny.
6. To Be or Not to Be is a delightfully comic take on a dreadfully momentous topic.
7. Royalties from Springtime for Hitler in Germany outta be sent to Lubitsch's family.
8. Like Chaplin before him in The Great Dictator, Lubitsch aimed a wet raspberry in Der Fuhrer's face.
9. One of film's great farces.
10. Lubitsch carefully mixes his usual brand of sophisticated humor with a bit of bittersweet.
Consensus: A complex and timely satire with as much darkness as slapstick, Ernst Lubitsch's To Be or Not To Be delicately balances humor and ethics.
Q: 1. The history books are written by the winners. Cate Shortland considers what happens to the rest in her devastating World War 2 flick Lore (the long-anticipated follow-up to the AFI-scooping Somersault).
2. [A] complex portrait of a young girl with repellent beliefs gradually coming of age and to an understanding of what it means to be human in the face of some heinous experiences.
3. It isn't exactly a profound film, but Saskia Rosendahl's performance has considerable depth, and she interacts admirably with her siblings.
4. A fiercely poetic portrait of a young woman staggering beyond innocence and denial, it's about the wars that rage within after the wars outside are lost.
5. Can we spare some sympathy or hope for the children of villains, even if they too show signs of their parents' evil? Lore provides no easy answers.
6. The portrait is miniature and yet indelible, a ghostly reminder of the 20th century.
7. Shortland is a master of tone here, beginning with a nightmarish, chaotic flight which grows darker during the journey and, perhaps darkest of all, at its final destination.
8. Remarkable for its unusual perspective...but never manages to connect emotionally as deeply as it might have.
9. Full of surprises, the movie draws a thin line between pity and revulsion - how would you feel if you had discovered your whole life had been based on lies?
10. One of the most powerful war stories to appear on screen. A story of the universal defeat of war and the enduring survival of the human spirit.
Based on these individual reviews, what is the critic consensus?

A:
Consensus: Newcomer Saskia Rosendahl gives an astonishingly assured performance in the title role, and director Cate Shortland establishes a delicate, disturbingly ominous tone in the powerful World War II drama Lore.