We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

[Q]: 'The Chicago case is unlikely to have much practical impact on most gun laws regardless of how the court rules,' said Paul Helmke, president of the Brady Center to Prevent Gun Violence.
[A]: Valid


[Q]: Gun control does nothing to make anyone safer or save lives.
[A]: Valid


[Q]: Now you may conjecture that the Founders accidentally used a subordinate clause in the 2nd amendment.
[A]:
Valid


