We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

I wouldn't mind it as much if there was a law that required some level of training for guns to be purchased, so we know that whoever buys these will no how to defend themselves.
Valid

Given the dissenting opinions, in the future they can not reasonably argue (because their active-duty-militia-status argument failed so miserably) that there is no individual right to keep and bear arms suitable for collective defense.
Valid

American homicide data are based on arrests, but British data are based on final dispositions.

Valid

