We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gay Marriage) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gay marriage. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gay marriage.

[Q]: *SOAWatch, a movement to challenge American foreign policy and its support for tyrants in Latin America, by calling annual attention to the School of the Americas which trains fascist terrorists.
[A]: Invalid


[Q]: And on another level, I can't help but wonder if you can appreciate how when the anti-gay crowd illogically complains about gays "damaging" marriage, what you are suggesting is ACTUALLY DAMAGING marriage.
[A]: Valid


[Q]: If you are saying that Massachusetts and California decided correctly because marriage is a common law institution, I would have to disagree.
[A]:
Valid


