Summarize the following movie reviews:

1. An intelligent and expertly-judged microcosm of the inanity of war.
2. Despite some missteps, No Man's Land is a shrewd film that provides a persuasive picture of how small conflicts can escalate into all-out war.
3. Skimps on character development for such a politically-charged movie
4. It's less about battlefields and weaponry than it is about personality conflicts and the agonizing frustration that boils inside people who want to put positive changes into effect, but are too entangled in red tape to do much of anything.
5. absurd situation creates lasting images that don't diminish with time
6. A brilliant and brilliantly disturbing film.
7. Tanovic adroitly indicts the entrenched hostilities between people and nations.
8. savage whimsy
9. No Man's Land is the superior version of Russell's slightly overrated Three Kings.
10. Makes us laugh and frustrates us at the same time.

Summary:
Bleak and darkly humorous, No Man's Land vividly illustrates the absurdity of war.