We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

Input: Consider Input: You argue that people cannot be trusted with guns, because they might injure themselves in accidents (hence the 4.46 figure).

Output: Valid


Input: Consider Input: I wouldn't mind it as much if there was a law that required some level of training for guns to be purchased, so we know that whoever buys these will no how to defend themselves.

Output: Valid


Input: Consider Input: However just because the Second Amendment isn't absolute in scope, that doesn't mean that it's perfectly legal to cook up and try and enforce these gun control measures that everybody seems to be so in favor of.


Output: Valid


