IN: Write an ordered list of reviews about "the wolf of wall street 2013".

OUT: 1. Why would a man cheat people out of millions and then spend it on hookers, 'ludes and stupid pranks? Hey, why wouldn't you?
2. At the highest level, it really is about getting your own, forget those down below. If so, that could have easily come across in two hours, it didn't need three.
3. There's editorial slackness here that Scorsese hasn't displayed in years, lost in a tornado of actor tics and improvisations that transform sections of movie into Apatowian indecision.
4. One of the most entertaining films ever made about loathsome men.
5. Too much explicit sex, drugs and profanity
6. ...while it justifiably indicts the conflict of interest pervasive in the stock broker profession, three hours of all this debauchery is just too much...and to not even mention one victim in 3 hours? That's inexcusable and superficial movie-making.
7. Imagine walking into a blow-the-roof-off party. Naked ladies galore. Pills popped like Tic Tacs. A game involving a dwarf and a bull's-eye. Crazy fun for a while, right? But then you're stuck there with a bunch of jerks. For three hours.
8. ... it's a good film, not a great one. Considering the source material and a protagonist that any actor would have a hard time making likeable, though, it's as great as it can be.
9. Scorsese doesn't actively condemn these characters in the way a traditional moralist would... He allows the characters to damn themselves.
10. I can't say I was ever bored (how could I be counting over 600 expletives & numerous instance of nudity, etc.). I just wish all involved showed a little more restraint with the overall offering. (Full Content Review for Parents also available)

IN: Write an ordered list of reviews about "pray the devil back to hell".

OUT: 1. Inevitably, Reticker's style falls into monotony that works against the material. Ultimately, though, the power of that material overcomes flaws in presentation.
2. Offers an inspiring portrait of conscientious citizens working to make a change. Yes they can, indeed.
3. Some political documentaries suffer from overselling the urgency of their agenda, but director Gini Reticker's Pray the Devil Back to Hell nicely underplays the significance of its subject.
4. Relates a powerful story with intelligence, concision and a minimum of distracting stylistic flourishes.
5. The story of the women's groups -- Christian and Muslim, uniting for the first time in the nation's history -- is unbelievably inspiring.
6. The film shows that the women's peace movement, propelled by ordinary citizens, changed what was possible in Liberia.
7. Pray the Devil Back to Hell is at once inspiring and horrific.
8. Pray the Devil uses its brief 72 minutes to tell one of the truly heartening international political stories of recent years.
9. The greatest respect Gini Reticker's Pray the Devil Back to Hell pays to its war-battered Liberian subjects is simply an unwillingness to embellish.
10. Gini Reticker's simply made, affecting documentary Pray the Devil Back to Hell reveals how these heroic ordinary women prodded the factions to peace and literally brought down Taylor, a leader of sociopathic cruelty.

IN: Write an ordered list of reviews about "white god".

OUT: 1. The filmmaker was wise choosing a species known for its capacity for unconditional love to make his point, its perversion all the more emotionally wrenching.
2. What holds Kornél Mundruczó's scrappy film all together is its fierce and forceful political metaphor: society's underdogs - be it ethnic minorities, the poor, the disenfranchised - if pushed too far, will bite back (in this case literally).
3. By turns Dickensian, Marxist and dystopian, it's a movie as deliriously unclassifiable as it is expertly focused in its desire to provoke and entertain.
4. Unfortunately, whatever satisfaction you may derive from seeing assorted nasty human beings get what's coming to them for betraying the trust of man's best friend is watered down by vague social and political allegory.
5. The whole production speaks well for the power of film; it's a serious stunner.
6. Intriguing, but the movie's larger statement isn't clear.
7. Rarely does a film's execution achieve or even exceed its director's ambitions, but Hungarian director Kornel Mundruczo's "White God" is that rare movie.
8. The film is no more than wildly inventive, engaging, exciting and memorable, with faultless performances by all the humans, and by Luke, Bodie and a Jack Russell terrier mix named Marlene. I can live with the disappointment.
9. Mundruczó's camera is itchy, moving, darting, as if sniffing, a "shaggy dog" approach, little nudges and sneaks ever so closer in scenes where the dogs move closer to war with mankind.
10. White God is a feat of practical filmmaking...

IN: Write an ordered list of reviews about "westworld".

OUT:
1. Brynner is very good, his austere presence and unflinching intent making him seem indestructible.
2. Robot western....cool.
3. classic in a boring sort of a way
4. Its serio-comedy is intellegently presented.
5. The idea exceeds the execution
6. There is some satire here - the devouring tourist becoming prey - but Crichton just lets the joke sit there, heavy on the screen.
7. Classic Man versus Machine adventure is funny but violent.
8. The central conceit is so flimsy that it's only possible to take it seriously at all by treating it as a metaphor. Which, fortunately, can be done pretty easily,
9. Priceless sci-fi schlock.
10. Combines solid entertainment, chilling topicality, and superbly intelligent serio-comic story values.