We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gay Marriage) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gay marriage. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gay marriage.

[EX Q]: For example, if a state Congress passes a bill that grants additional benefits to marriages and civil unions, a governor could simply line-item veto the benefit to civil unions, which then means that the benefits would apply only to marriage.
[EX A]: Valid

[EX Q]: And you say gays are entitled to every privilege the rest of us are and then you suggest that being gay would negatively effect the "values" of a child, so that shouldn't be allowed.
[EX A]: Valid

[EX Q]: Or put in a different light, parents always have the right to raise their children as they please.
[EX A]:
Invalid

