In this task, you will be shown a sentence, and you should determine whether it is overruling or non-overruling. In law, an overruling sentence is a statement that nullifies a previous case decision as a precedent by a constitutionally valid statute or a decision by the same or higher ranking court which establishes a different rule on the point of law involved. Classify your answers into overruling or non-overruling

Q: to the extent that busot v. busot, 354 so.2d 1255 (fla.2d dca 1978); clemons v. morris, 350 so.2d 519 (fla. 4th dca 1977); hall v. air force finance center, department of the air force of the united states, 344 so.2d 1340 (fla. 1st dca 1977); and decastro v. decastro, 334 so.2d 834 (fla.3d dca 1976), are inconsistent with this decision, they are disapproved.

A: overruling
****
Q: on the contrary, what impresses me is the obduracy of high-minded state courts, like that of new york under the leadership of judge cardozo, in refusing to adopt the federal rule of exclusion.

A: non-overruling
****
Q: austero v. national cas. co. (1978) 84 cal.app.3d 1, 24-25 [ 148 cal.rptr. 653], is disapproved.

A:
overruling
****
