IN: Write an ordered list of reviews about "white men cant jump".

OUT: 1. Shelton's film is so raggedy that it never finds its focus, despite another terrific performance from Snipes, one of the finest actors in movies today.
2. Shelton's enthusiasm is remarkably refreshing, but it's not enough to mean well, and we don't know much more about these people or their world at the end than we learn at the beginning.
3. This is one director who loves words, and what a rare thing that is.
4. Occasionally very funny dialogue is not enough to rescue a story about the lives of two basketball hustlers who basically live for the game.
5. ...the formula is hackneyed and could get tiresome quickly if it weren't for the energy of its stars and the inventive style of its writer-director, Ron Shelton.
6. Here is a comedy of great high spirits, with an undercurrent of sadness and sweetness that makes it a lot better than the plot itself could possibly suggest.
7. For the most part, it's a provocative one-on-one between racial opposites Wesley Snipes and Woody Harrelson.
8. This is better than any other basketball comedy you'll find of late.
9. Hustlin' hoops tale with too much skin for kids.
10. Even basketball-phobes will enjoy it.

IN: Write an ordered list of reviews about "hugo".

OUT: 1. If however, you are not a film scholar or a fan of the period, Scorsese will skillfully turn you into one without you even knowing it.
2. Scorsese uses 3D to submerge viewers into a glittering storybook world, but all of Hugo's beauty can't make up for the sidetracking of the tale of the orphaned boy living in the train station in favor of a film preservation PSA.
3. The movie itself runs a bit long at 127 minutes, but "Hugo" is worth every minute for the visual feast it provides.
4. Scorcese does not mess around. This is a magnificent film.
5. An infectious ode to the early days of cinema. Scorsese's use of 3D is inspired, although it might be more interesting for parents than their children.
6. Hugo is a love affair -- palpable and personal -- between director Marty Scorsese and cinema. It sputters, floats, and soars.
7. "Hugo" is a movie that children will enjoy, adults will admire and film buffs will cheer. It is a movie that will surprise and delight you with its wonder and awe.
8. A powerful reminder of the magic of cinema and Martin Scorsese's astounding versatility...
9. ... a phantasmagorical fusion of 'Oliver Twist' and 'Edward Scissorhands' ... but in the end it feels pedantic and, like Méličs' robot, proves a wondrous contraption motorized by a spring-driven heart.
10. Exquisite - Definitely Oscar Worthy

IN: Write an ordered list of reviews about "4 months 3 weeks and 2 days".

OUT: 1. Observes with ruthless, artful precision. While plunging a knife through your soul.
2. Proceeding with a blunt and sometimes brutal relentlessness, 4 Months, 3 Weeks and 2 Days impresses and engrosses as a work of stark, spare naturalism.
3. A film of brutal, breathtaking intelligence, a work of pellucid, shimmering art without a scintilla of compromise, 4 Months, 3 Weeks, and 2 Days is surely one of the very best films of the year. And you can pick the year.
4. His film unfolds with a graceful realism, as if he just happened to catch life unfolding for these two desperate women. His film never hits a false note...
5. Virtuosic, assured, and possessed of undeniable aesthetic force, it's also hard not to turn away from.
6. 4 Months, 3 Weeks and 2 Days is a feminist film of the toughest and most rewarding kind. Without flinching, it looks at the limits of female friendship and college romance; it depicts the horrors of illegal abortion from every angle.
7. It's a testament to the brilliance of Mungiu's writing and the actors' performances that the conversations feel more natural than anything captured on a reality show.
8. Just as Romanians got used to eating bones with little meat on them, they must also have gotten used to movies with very little dramatic meat.
9. The mesmerizing 4 Months, 3 Weeks and 2 Days represents another outstanding offering from Romania, a country in the throes of a cinematic renaissance.
10. A brilliant and discomfiting film.

IN: Write an ordered list of reviews about "three monkeys".

OUT:
1. A powerfully bleak family drama that leaves its characters' offenses largely offscreen but lingers with agonizing, drawn-out deliberation on the consequences.
2. It is accomplished, but overdetermined. Its dramatic force can't its equal its visual impact, resulting in a clear indication of where Ceylan's strengths as a director lie.
3. It's certainly worth catching.
4. Those willing to think for themselves, not in a rush for the dénouement and appreciate cinematographic narrative techniques will surely savour nearly every frame of director/co-writer Nuri Bilge Ceylan's ... exceptionally crafted tale of crime, corruption
5. Patience will be required to appreciate this brilliant, gorgeously visual film.
6. Three Monkeys, could be reduced to a simple moral - never do a dodgy politician a favour - though its layering of ironies and wrong turnings render it more subtly disturbing than that précis might suggest.
7. This is a fascinating transitional film from an intriguing director at the top of his game.
8. A grim, slow-burning exploration of guilt, grief and murder that keeps the audience at arm's length through its cold, intermittently misanthropic, vision of humanity but which is filled with ravishing images and a powerfully brooding atmosphere.
9. This is a fascinating film that, once seen, is hard to dislodge from your imagination.
10. A subtly persuasive drama steeped in a strangely beautiful pallor, thanks to superb HD cinematography.