We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.
One example: If gun bans worked there would be no gun deaths in the countries that have banned guns.
Solution is here: Valid
Explanation: It is an argument that claims that gun bans will not work.

Now, solve this: So unless you're talking about reforming the system, like the NICS Improvement Act was supposed to do, you're obviously talking about denying people their right to own guns in the first place.
Solution:
Valid