Q: 1. Nasty, profane and wickedly entertaining!
2. Starts off as a twisted, messed up mind game, but ends up a typically sappy love story that, strangely, isn't even about love.
3. Rent Dangerous Liaisons and save yourself the trouble.
4. Entertaining. Engaging. A calculated guilty pleasure.
5. Despite its highly descriptive dialogue, Cruel Intentions features no nudity ... I doubt teenage boys will be satisfied just to hear Buffy talk dirty.
6. Witty, raunchy!
7. A sly, silly, mostly well-crafted diversion that's no trash classic, but has little to apologize for.
8. Solid dialogue, luscious characters, great comic relief, and an admittedly classic story give it wings above the standard teen-oriented dreck on the market.
9. It's a lame, trashy teenage soap opera.
10. The themes are intact, and for some fans of the original story, that should be all that matters.
Based on these individual reviews, what is the critic consensus?

A: Consensus: Even in a slick package and an attractive cast, the movie succumbs to bad acting and a bad script.
1. While sweet and stupid, it still provides for good entertainment due to its heart and wit.
2. I admire Kevin Smith for...trying to stretch (but) if this is the best he can do, please, oh please, bring back those trash-mouthed stoners Jay and Silent Bob.
3. The man who once envisioned a monster made entirely out of poop now only allows the substance to be used in a cutesy joke involving a baby's diaper.
4. It's great to see a filmmaker you admire ... try something so completely different.
5. Le passage de Kevin Smith au cinéma plus commercial et plus grand public s'avčre donc un accouchement difficile.
6. A treacly mess that recalls Robin Williams in his 'I need a hug' phase.
7. It's way too tame for Smith's hardcore fans -- they'll probably hate every minute of it -- and not solid enough to draw new admirers.
8. Big, gooey (but often likable) misfire.
9. ...a warm, wonderful and touching little film.
10. Smith tones down his trademark vulgarity to bring his message to the PG-13 crowd, and slices the cherished edge off his voice in the process.
Consensus: A surprisingly conventional romantic comedy from Kevin Smith, Jersey Girl is warm but often overly sentimental
Q: 1. Though it aims to be a sharply humorous look at the mommy wars, I Don't Know How She Does It has nothing remotely new or comical in its arsenal.
2. [I]t's not a story. It's a quirky Hallmark card... A story needs conflict; even a comedy, which this nominally is, needs drama. And there isn't any here.
3. Too much time and energy is directed toward that go-nowhere story, wasting the film's best asset, which is the low-key, lived-in rapport between Parker and Kinnear.
4. Spiffy-looking, well-intentioned but ultimately witless.
5. Why was a string of sitcom problems stretched to 91 minutes?
6. A chick flick that feels thirty years behind the times.
7. What the hell happened to Sarah Jessica Parker?
8. "I Don't Know How She Does It" seems stuck in the past.
9. Leaves you wondering why nobody involved with this film seems to have ever met an actual working mother.
10. It's not that I Don't Know How She Does It tells actual lies about working motherhood - many of its observations and jokes are on point - it's just that it omits the edge, the desperation of a woman on the verge.
Based on these individual reviews, what is the critic consensus?

A: Consensus: A limp comedy with a hopelessly outdated viewpoint on gender, featuring Sarah Jessica Parker in rote Carrie-mode.
1. Either as history at its most inspiring or moviemaking at its most exciting, The Tunnel is a trip.
2. It's so well told that you'll be biting your nails until the film's final few minutes.
3. It's a gripping great-escape yarn of the sort we don't see much anymore.
4. The Tunnel proved to be too exciting for mere broadcast
5. Richter gives a raw, frank but sophisticated account of the excruciating logistics of this great escape, and the appalling, inspiring blend of betrayal and courage that attended the group's herculean efforts.
6. A true story few people will know, and it's told with a warm, crafty efficiency that makes for wonderful entertainment.
7. Well-cast and sporadically gripping.
8. It is the kind of superbly crafted, intelligent entertainment -- a classic suspense thriller -- that nowadays is as welcome as it is rare.
9. This true story about one of the many tunnel escape attempts under the Berlin wall in the 60s provides all the excitement of an escape movie, given extra depth and resonance by its real life genesis... a superb film
10. Richter makes wonderful if obvious use of the wall and the tunnel as built-in metaphors for our struggle for human connection and dread of helplessness and change.
Consensus: The Tunnel is both a tension-filled thriller and a riveting history lesson.
Q: 1. The film's candid-camera skits are mostly unoriginal.
2. It's sadomasochism at its drunkest.
3. oddly enduring, crap though
4. A lot more money than when they made their first film. But no more sense.
5. I couldn't look away, and neither could anyone else in the audience I saw the movie with. We hooted and hollered at the screen, captured by a single involuntary impulse.
6. The title tells all. To hell with it.
7. I can't recommend their methods, I will applaud their energy and commitment to this particular brand of stupidity.
8. Like the happy train wreck Jackass has always been, the boys deliver sequences at once stomach-turning and undeniably entertaining...
9. Repetition is the point and the sticking point of Number Two, which is all about self-reference and reiteration.
10. Vomit.There. If that got your attention, and it sickened you, please proceed to another review.
Based on these individual reviews, what is the critic consensus?

A: Consensus: Better than any sequel to a movie of a television show has a right to be, Jackass: Number Two dares you not to laugh.
Q: 1. The glitter and kitsch, and jaw-dropping performances by Michael Douglas as the middle-age Liberace and Matt Damon as his much younger boy-toy Scott Thorson, make this a wild ride without compare.
2. Douglas manages to take a real-life cartoon character and make him into a sometimes kind, often cruel, real person.
3. Director Steven Soderbergh's dramedy features great performances by Michael Douglas and Matt Damon in the story of entertainer Liberace and his longtime lover.
4. The story as told is just too depressing, too empty and, most of all, too dead and gone.
5. All the joy, hurt and anger of any great cinema romance.
6. If this really is the end of the road for Soderbergh, then what a class act to finish on.
7. There's never a sense Douglas or director Steven Soderbergh is after a caricature, but there's still the sense that we sometimes get one.
8. Whether the biopic Behind the Candelabra ends up being a swan song for director Steven Soderbergh or merely the last entry in one phase of a long career, it's an impressive work.
9. Behind the Candelabra isn't a smear job, but it's not a revelation, either.
10. Soderbergh is clearly captivated, as are we all, by the rot underlying the glitz, but even with Douglas' nuanced performance, the film simplifies too many things.
Based on these individual reviews, what is the critic consensus?

A:
Consensus: Affectionate without sacrificing honesty, Behind the Candelabra couples award-worthy performances from Michael Douglas and Matt Damon with some typically sharp direction from Steven Soderbergh.