Q: 1. This is one of the oddest, yet emotionally richest and most exhilarating motion-picture experiences to come our way in quite some time.
2. The performances are all around great, with everyone fitting perfectly into their given role.
3. Magnolia is a bold, rich, meandering tapestry of lost souls in conflict, made by an artist who may be in conflict himself. It's a film of fits.
4. Make no mistake, Magnolia is unlike any other film released this past year, be it from the aspect of its storylines, of which there are many, or its emotional clarity, which is, quite frankly, brutal.
5. The most imperfect of the year's best movies, Magnolia's flaws are easily forgiven because they are the result of go-for-broke ambition.
6. Magnolia is Short Cuts with hope. It's my kind of mess.
7. One day, one city, but emotionally and cinematically, it's an epic.
8. The film's strength lies in the economy of its narration: each of its scenes pulls the viewer directly into the heart of all conflict, a choice which tries to compensate for the overwhelming diversity of all its stories.
9. Contains moments of considerable beauty, terror, and insight.
10. A smashing success.
Based on these individual reviews, what is the critic consensus?

A: Consensus: Critics say Magnolia is an ambitious, lengthy work that ultimately succeeds due to the interesting stories and excellent ensemble performances.
1. It may not be true that animals in a zoo feel jailed, but you'll feel that way if you sit through all 80 minutes of this sub-par animated Disney misfire.
2. You will not find a worse movie in Walt Disney's animated canon than The Wild
3. I predict that audiences will not go wild over this one.
4. a passable movie because of its star, and because talking animals are funny
5. Ending with a sputter, "Wild" still remains an engaging creation, and successful against incredible odds. Here's a note to Disney and Dreamworks: You can stop making the same movies now.
6. Feels like a rough draft that was dashed off in an afternoon with the intention of coming back later and filling in some comedy, and then somehow never got around to it.
7. fails to live up to its title in every way. ...The animation is slickly executed and the hyperactivity level is off the charts, yet the film is rarely exciting or funny; it's just tiresome.
8. The screen credit 'Directed by Steve 'Spaz' Williams' does not exactly make the heart flutter with anticipation.
9. [O]ne of the dullest and most unfunny cartoons ever to lurch out under the Disney banner.
10. As animated features go, it's strictly paint-by-numbers.
Consensus: With a rehashed plot and unimpressive animation, there's nothing wild about The Wild.
Q: 1. covering a wide canvas of animal welfare and rights issues that rightfully will provoke meaningful discussion
2. The most controversial, provocative, inflammatory and thought-provoking film of the year!
3. While avoiding the most important travesty--the use of animals for food--the documentary does efficiently illustrate the arguments for an against the use of animals for research and fur.
4. ...a flawed yet remarkably even-handed look at an extraordinarily contentious issue.
5. Your Mommy Kills Animals is eye-opening in the truest sense of the word. I was riveted from start to finish. This is one of the year's best films.
6. What may be the finest documentary of the year also is the most difficult to watch. I wept unashamedly at the brief videos of real-life animal abuse in "Your Mommy Kills Animals," and you may, too.
7. A documentary that both informs and entertains, and that will invite animated debate--which is precisely what a good documentary should do.
8. With a subject that holds as much venom as this one does, Mommy remains amazingly poised.
9. Terrific documentary on the animal rights movement that allows all sides in the debate to make their points.
10. David Martosko, of the Center for Consumer Freedom, carries the film's obscured theme that "morality" is a religious-based ploy used by all sides of the animal abuse debate that lead the FBI to rank animal-rights activists as the No.1 terrorist threat in
Based on these individual reviews, what is the critic consensus?

A: Consensus: A thoroughly fascinating, well-presented examination of the animal rights debate that is both provocative and thought-provoking.
1. The pic's general stupidity, careless direction and reliance on a single-joke premise that was never really funny to begin with are only the most obvious of its problems.
2. It's not good, but you're not going to get many chances to see Pacino have this much fun.
3. Not so much a movie, but a challenge to your soul. Maybe it is designed to make us wonder if there is a God, and if he will save you from this disaster. He won't.
4. I'm not even sure this qualifies as a real movie.
5. Jack and Jill isn't awful or particularly successful. It is, however, the curiosity piece expected, totally undemanding and just bizarre enough in concept to keep one's interest up.
6. One can only wonder if Steve Koren's screenplay is in part inspired by Sandler's real-life attempt as a producer to pull Pacino into this wreck.
7. Lazy and slapdash, the work of a comedian trusting too much in his own hilariousness.
8. Feels like an elementary school recess that's gone on too long, the merrymaking strained and the participants looking tired even when they're in full comic dudgeon.
9. It plays out as lame as you might think with the dude version being Sandler in "angry" mode and the sister nothing more than a collection of obnoxious traits.
10. More than 24 hours has passed since I watched the new Adam Sandler movie Jack and Jill and I am still dead inside.
Consensus: Although it features an inexplicably committed performance from Al Pacino, Jack and Jill is impossible to recommend on any level whatsoever.
Q: 1. A breath of fresh air within this genre...
2. A simple, slow-moving, shaggy-dog story that has enough charm to keep us involved but not enough dramatic tension to rise above the ordinary.
3. [S]mart and sweet but unsentimental and warmly genuine in its portrait of childhood innocence and the adventure of growing up...
4. I wanted to like Winn-Dixie ... I just didn't believe it.
5. There's bad, there's "so bad it's good"... and then there's this moronic film.
6. Because of Winn-Dixie-based on the beloved novel by Kate DiCamillo-turns out to be a modest success for the family crowd.
7. Most of the time, you can't go wrong with kids and dogs. Then there's Because of Winn-Dixie.
8. Sure, there's nothing here that hasn't already been covered in a Hallmark movie, but it's still refreshing to find a well-made, enjoyable film for families.
9. [The script] can never decide whether this is supposed to be an over-the-top comedy or a deeply moving drama -- and doesn't do that well at either.
10. In pace, sensibility, and big, beating heart, this is a child's first indie film, and it's the better for it.
Based on these individual reviews, what is the critic consensus?

A:
Consensus: An old-fashioned, if bland, adaptation of Kate DiCamillo's novel.