Summarize the following movie reviews:

1. Killers don't need motivation anymore, just opportunity. And despite game efforts to throw us off the scene, to surprise us into who will live and tell the tale, there aren't any surprises.
2. What is the point, other than to show up the director's technical skill at presenting mutilation?
3. The four actors fit into their respective roles nicely, though in the case of Jarrat's bushman Mick, nice isn't quite the right word.
4. This is some horror flick.
5. There's no suspense, really, and the movie is carelessly vague about the victims, who have as much personality as lambs lining up for the slaughter.
6. The even pacing and attention to character detail is what makes that harrowing second half so effective.
7. There's no substitute for bad taste. And this one has it double-barreled, both in the timing of its release and as a movie, one said to be loosely based on fact.
8. Hey, here's an idea for the new year. What if a bunch of us get together somewhere and burn all copies of movies like "Wolf Creek?"
9. ... the ordeal is excruciating -- for the audience and for the victims...
10. Wolf Creek is wicked and witless -- cruel for the sake of cruelty.

Summary:
Though Wolf Creek is effectively horrific, it is still tasteless exploitation.