Q: 1. The movie's devices are so feeble, I think it was written on a napkin in a Denny's the day before principal photography began.
2. Yes, it was bad. But I laughed.
3. What's the most positive thing that can be said about the new Rob Schneider vehicle? Well, it's not as pathetic as The Animal.
4. It's push-the-limits teen comedy, the type written by people who can't come up with legitimate funny, and it's used so extensively that good bits are hopelessly overshadowed.
5. "Freaky Friday," it's not.
6. Enough to make any woman or gay man wish they could beam themselves to planet Zoltron.
7. The movie spends more time with Schneider than with newcomer McAdams, even though her performance is more interesting (and funnier) than his.
8. [A] wonderful pile of stench.
9. Even for its genre and the possibility of a counterprogramming miracle, it looms a wobbly entry.
10. A surprisingly good-natured throwback to the '80s heyday of the body-switching genre.
Based on these individual reviews, what is the critic consensus?

A: Consensus: The Hot Chick's one-note concept gets stretched thin, and a lot of the jokes fall flat.
1. Modern movies begin here, with Jean-Luc Godard's Breathless in 1960. No debut film since Citizen Kane in 1942 has been as influential.
2. Godard's attention to nuance and detail makes this influential classic a must-see for any film lover.
3. Decades later, this seminal work of the French New Wave is still one of Godard's freshest, most innovative, and most accessible films with a stunning performance by Jean Paul Belmondo channeling Bogart.
4. Even if some of Breathless remains inaccessibly arty and obtuse, it's nonetheless a film of watershed importance.
5. Who doesn't like Breathless? It's some kind of free-wheeling comic experiment in cool, and it works the whole way.
6. A stunning classic.
7. This film, a first pic by a film critic, shows the immediate influence of Yank actioners and socio-psycho thrillers but has its own personal style.
8. Shot on a shoestring and none the worse for it, Jean-Luc Godard's gritty and engaging first feature had an almost revolutionary impact when first released in 1960.
9. Beautiful.
10. Regardless of how one feels about Jean-Luc Godard's later, less accessible works, it would be hard to find a more audacious debut feature.
Consensus: Breathless rewrote the rules of cinema -- and more than 50 years after its arrival, Jean-Luc Godard's paradigm-shifting classic remains every bit as vital.
Q: 1. An unexpectedly moving family portrait of cousins we didn't know we had.
2. A sensitive and eye-opening documentary.
3. Moving and, ultimately, hopeful -- a hope that extends further than most documentaries allow.
4. Trembling Before G-d, by no stretch a well constructed documentary film, is an important breakthrough for Jewish orthodoxy because ignoring a consistent problem helps no one.
5. The film helpfully translates onscreen some of the Hebrew words of the interviewees for the benefit of goyim whose only exposure to the Hasidim has been Yentl.
6. A profoundly touching look at the plight of gay Orthodox Jews who are trying to integrate their sexuality with their religious beliefs. While the style is not innovative, the subject matter is groundbreaking.
7. Powerful documentary about the struggle of gay and lesbian orthodox Jews to reconcile their beliefs and their desires
8. It offers several interesting insights into the seemingly incongruous matters of homosexuality and orthodox religion.
9. A heavy subject for any filmmaker to broach, and it definitely exceeds the skills of first-time director Sandi Simcha Dubowski.
10. This insightful documentary simmers with a fury that's passionate enough not to need spelling out.
Based on these individual reviews, what is the critic consensus?

A: Consensus: Trembling Before G-d looks at the effects of religious morality on believers whose sexuality falls outside the accepted norm with intelligence and compassion.
1. Allen waxes snide, and, despite the huge cast, there's not much going on.
2. Hannah is a masterpiece, a triumph of aesthetic balances like nothing the writer-director achieved previously or since, and a pinnacle of American moviemaking.
3. The film lives and breathes. It's a masterwork.
4. This movie feels real, the people seem real and the situations all ring true.
5. A film of great tenderness and humanity.
6. One of Woody Allen's great films. Indeed, he makes nary a misstep from beginning to end in charting the amorous affiliations of three sisters and their men over a two-year period.
7. Achieves the kind of perfect balance that comes along maybe once in a filmmaker's career.
8. Filled with tart observations and clever asides on the warps of contemporary culture.
9. It is an articulate, literate film, full of humanity and perception about its sometimes less-than-loveable characters.
10. Ranks among Allen's masterpieces.
Consensus: Smart, tender, and funny in equal measure, Hannah and Her Sisters is one of Woody Allen's finest films.
Q: 1. The broad obvious jokes are generally tossed away with a panache that might be mistaken for subtlety; the performances are affable; and there's even the odd surprise along the way.
2. Pleasantville seemed to say that such squeaky clean living is unnatural and unsustainable. Blast probably aims lower than its counterpart, but it came closer to its mark.
3. A modestly fun little comedy.
4. ...entertains without pretensions.
5. Despite the talented cast and an inherently funny idea, Wilson and company's mediocre script squanders what could have been a highly original comedy.
6. Walken's skill at warped humor isn't new, but Spacek is a revelation; her reactions and comic timing are all fabulous.
7. An intelligent and lively romantic comedy with a subversive edge.
8. Quite a stylish, sophisticated and sweetly satirical comedy
9. This is a movie of delayed payoffs. Spacek gets better as she gets wiggier after decades in the bunker.
10. Blast from the Past is a sweet-natured comedy that is worth seeing.
Based on these individual reviews, what is the critic consensus?

A: Consensus: Cute idea, but not consistently funny.
Q: 1. You'll probably need a tissue or two, but the film earns every sniffle due to its sharply astute writing, directing and acting.
2. It's a chick-flick, no question, but it's one with half a brain. Not much, but half a brain is half more than expected.
3. A smart and surprisingly rewarding gem with resonating themes and ideas, In Her Shoes is episodic mainstream filmmaking done right.
4. No great claims should be made for In Her Shoes. But there is something to be said for froth when it's expertly whipped.
5. As it was winding down, I remember thinking I wasn't ready for this movie to end. These were people I liked, and I wasn't ready to give them up.
6. Imagine Sex and the City negotiating Terms of Endearment with The Golden Girls.
7. This marvelous, up-with-the-lark movie stays sunny all day, with wit and intelligence to spare.
8. Curtis Hanson wrests a richly textured story of love from Jennifer Weiner's breezy bestselling fiction about two sisters engaged in an epic battle of the heart.
9. manages to pull off a fairly astonishing hat trick: It's generally quite funny, its emotional moments ring true, and it features a trio of outstanding performances...
10. In Her Shoes has enough homespun wisdom to make you hurl, but the tone and acting are so sharp, it never feels like a sit-down with Dr. Phil.
Based on these individual reviews, what is the critic consensus?

A:
Consensus: Honesty and solid performances make In Her Shoes a solid fit for all audiences.