Q: 1. Despite the requisite Hollywood ending, everyone can leave the theater happy.
2. I was licking my movie critic chops anticipating a juicy negative review of what surely would be a disastrous take on another ghost-story-turned-romance. Surprise, surprise!
3. Offers further proof that a film really can get by on the charms of its stars.
4. It's fine for what it is. A romantic comedy with a slight supernatural bent, but it doesn't go far enough.
5. A solid, thought-provoking movie with charm.
6. Reese Witherspoon returns to a classier brand of romantic comedy.
7. See two charming characters make beautiful music together.
8. Witherspoon and Ruffalo underplay the broad comedy and their characters' attraction, which is why their chemistry ultimately proves to be so satisfying.
9. Starts out glib and gimmicky but later digs surprisingly deep.
10. Despite the modern trappings, Just Like Heaven is as retro as hell.
Based on these individual reviews, what is the critic consensus?

A: Consensus: Delightfully sweet like a lollipop, Just Like Heaven is a dreamy romantic comedy that may give you a toothache when it attempts to broach difficult end of life issues by throwing a cherry on top.
1. Na Hong-Jin's feature debut is a bleakly frantic psycho-noir, furiously edited, ferociously performed - and despite allying itself to the serial killer genre so beloved in the west, it is distinctly Korean in its settings and references.
2. Some of the tension drains from a slow middle act, but it remains a gripping tale of sleuth-work and moral awakening.
3. It runs so fast and twisted a course through a range of tones and genres that just trying to keep up will leave the viewer as breathless as the monstrous protagonist - and it has a real social conscience to boot.
4. It announces Na Hong-jin as a filmmaker willing to go to places that even most so-called horror movies would shy away from.
5. It's twisty, provocative and impressively grim, a sort of Asian-extreme Manhunter for the strong of nerve.
6. It's atmospheric but derivative, and I didn't find the denouement's Christian imagery convincing.
7. Watching the Korean film The Chaser is like chewing diamonds - you know there's something of value in there but mostly it's just a mess of pain and blood.
8. This playfulness, however, backfires massively in the second half when coincidence and unforeseen consequence conspire uneasily with bloody, messy results.
9. South Korean first-timer Na Hong-jin offers nasty thrills, manic foot chases and some genuinely subversive riffs on the police procedural.
10. Unlike the directors of Infernal Affairs, Hong-Jin refreshingly fuels his philosophical engine with montage.
Consensus: A frantic and taut Korean serial killer thriller. One classy, if bloody and messy, gut wrencher of a movie.
Q: 1. John Malkovich delivers one of the most deliciously creepy performances of his outstanding career...
2. The tension builds throughout and rarely lets go.
3. "In The Line Of Fire" might be the perfect thriller.
4. In the Line of Fire is often an explosive blend of pounding tension and wisecracking humor. This is formula dished out by experts.
5. Malkovich does such wonderfully unexpected things, especially with his line readings, that he leaves us dumbfounded. No other performer is more effortlessly unnerving than this perversely gifted actor.
6. Despite the familiar plot elements ... In the Line of Fire is not a retread but a smart, tense, well-made thriller -- Eastwood's best in the genre since Tightrope.
7. ...Eastwood in the true Eastwood mode--eyes narrowed, brow furrowed, fists clenched, gun in hand.
8. A well-paced thriller worth watching.
9. [It] is not a brilliant movie. But thanks to Eastwood, it feels like one.
10. In the Line of Fire is a terrific action movie with good performances and a smart script that occasionally falters for trying too hard but, on the whole, takes us on psychological journeys that few of us have had opportunities to experience.
Based on these individual reviews, what is the critic consensus?

A: Consensus: A straightforward thriller of the highest order, In the Line of Fire benefits from Wolfgang Peterson's taut direction and charismatic performances from Clint Eastwood and John Malkovich.
1. Toback fashions a sharp doc out of a blunt object.
2. Director James Toback gives the audience a raw and realistic view into one of the biggest names in sports of all time.
3. Hardly anyone thinks of ... Tyson as articulate and sincere. But director James Toback does and captures these qualities in a fascinating, sympathetic portrait. Tyson is a film of vast surprises.
4. Unless you just can't stand the sight of the guy, Tyson is a fascinating film.
5. The movie is a useful portrait of a mentally tortured man, but I'm not sure it documents anything definitively biographical about Tyson.
6. Deploying multiple split screens and a discreet but effective score, Tyson is hugely engrossing at the same time that it is not entirely credible.
7. Tyson is about the processes that make Mike Tyson.
8. It's like a Spalding Gray monologue performed by a maniac.
9. Emotionally and psychologically raw, this is a revelatory experience. Tyson has a Second Act, he could mentor a troubled teen like his savior Cus D'Amato.
10. Those who were furious at Tyson will be made even angrier by Toback's film, for here is a fresh provocation-an attempt to restore to Tyson the human dimensions that have been taken from him (by himself, of course, as well as by others).
Consensus: A fascinating, emotional, and frank confessional from Iron Mike that sheds a sympathetic light on one of boxing's most controversial icons.
Q: 1. Shot piecemeal over the course of four years on locations in 18 countries, The Fall is a genuine labor of love -- and a real bore.
2. This whacked-out fairy tale for grown-ups is as stunning in its beauty as it is in its lack of logic.
3. Some of the set pieces are ravishing, more often they're ravishingly clunky.
4. For a film that wants to present itself as extravagantly dazzling, there is something thuddingly familiar and bland in its vision.
5. This is a feast for the eyes and a famine for the brain.
6. [Tarsem] Singh's visual sense is stunning, but he's also attuned to the darker corners of children's imaginations.
7. The Fall is aptly named not only because it pertains to a tragic descent but because viewers will feel as if they have plunged headlong into an alternate universe with this dazzling adult fairy tale.
8. Each and every of Tarsem's visuals scratch onerously at the mind, heart, and cornea.
9. A paean to the art of storytelling as it existed before mass-produced visual media replaced the spoken word as the primary creative medium.
10. The scope of Tarsem's imagination and vision and the delightful pairing of Pace and Untaru creates an eclectic fantasy tale unlike anything we've since The Adventures of Baron Munchausen.
Based on these individual reviews, what is the critic consensus?

A:
Consensus: More visually elaborate than the fragmented story can sometimes support, The Fall walks the line between labor of love and filmmaker self-indulgence.