We would like you to assess the QUALITY of each of the following argument (discussing Gun Control) and determine if the argument is Valid or Invalid. A valid argument is clearly interpretable and either expresses an argument, or a premise or a conclusion that can be used in an argument for the topic of gun control. An invalid argument is a phrase that cannot be interpreted as an argument or not on the topic of gun control.

Example Input: In order to have a 'well regulated' militia you can not bar the civilian populace of its right to keep and bear arms!
Example Output: Valid

Example Input: This they cannot do without abandoning the more guns = more crime myth.
Example Output: Valid

Example Input: Is there any justification for preventing people with no criminal record from acquiring post-'86 models, when the pre-'86 models aren't being used for committing crimes?
Example Output:
Valid

