In this task, you are given an article. Your task is to summarize the article in a sentence.

"His condition is considered stable" and "it is too early to make any predictions about his future health," Lola Karimova-Tillyaeva wrote on her Instagram account.
Ms Karimova-Tillyaeva pleaded for people to "refrain from speculations".
Mr Karimov, 78, has been leader of the former Soviet republic since before independence in 1991.
In an unusual move on Sunday, the Uzbek government admitted he was receiving treatment but did not give details.
The BBC's Abdujalil Abdurasulov says that the announcement caught many by surprise in authoritarian Uzbekistan, a country where any information about the president's health is treated like a state secret.
President Karimov is known to have had health issues, but the government has never previously issued a statement about his health.
It has become a tradition in Uzbekistan for the president to dance during major holiday festivities.
By doing so Mr Karimov sends a message to the nation that he is fit and healthy.
Everyone was expecting the president to attend Independence Day celebrations - perhaps the government's confirmation that he is in hospital was a necessary move to prepare the public for his non-appearance.
Tashkent-based human rights campaigner Surat Ikramov says that most people are too afraid to talk openly about Mr Karimov's hospitalisation in one of the most repressive countries in the world.
"Any vocalisation that Mr Karimov's power is not absolute is seen as a threat to the entire system," says Human Rights Watch spokesman Steve Swerdlow.
"Even if he survives this illness or whatever it is, this is an acknowledgement of [Mr] Karimov's mortality, and of the fact that the system is about to change."
Uzbekistan opens up on president's health
Profile: Islam Karimov
The Kremlin said on Monday that it deeply regretted Mr Karimov's illness. It refused to comment on whether there was concern in Moscow that it could enflame uncertainty in Central Asia's most populous country, which borders Afghanistan.
"The Kremlin wishes a quick recovery to the president of Uzbekistan," spokesman Dmitry Peskov said.
"We would like to receive only positive news about the president's health."
Mr Karimov was last seen on state TV on 17 August, meeting the South Korean interior minister.
Independence Day celebrations - which the president would always attend - are to be held on 1 September.
In her message, Ms Karimova-Tillyaeva, who serves as Uzbekistan's ambassador to Unesco in Paris, asked people "to show respect to our family's right to privacy".
There have been a number of occasions when the president was rumoured to have a stroke or a heart attack.
The last time it happened was just before the 2015 presidential election, when Mr Karimov was not seen in public for several weeks - fuelling rumours about his poor health.
Uzbek President Islam Karimov is in intensive care after suffering a brain haemorrhage, his daughter says.

Eastwood was the only animal left after a charity found new homes for 1,571 cats and dogs in just one day.
Eastwood had been poorly when he was younger and the charity thought this may have put people off.
But thankfully the story has a happy ending.
The Bissell Pet Foundation had a free adoption day at 69 shelters in the American state of Michigan, which meant loads of people came to look for new pets.
A thousand animals got new homes in the build up to the big day too.
Lots of people heard about Eastwood being left on his own and tried to find him a new home.
One family who heard about Eastwood was the Van Gundy family.
Steve, the dad of the family, is coach of the Detroit Pistons, a very famous basketball team in the United States.
They had meant to go to the adoption event but missed out.
When they heard Eastwood was still waiting to find a new home they said the knew he was the dog for them.
The family say they are looking forward to taking Eastwood swimming in the lake by their house.
A one-year-old Labrador finally has a new home after seeing thousands of his animal friends get new owners.

Lord & Taylor had been charged with paying 50 "influencers" to post photos of themselves on the same weekend in March 2015 wearing one of its dresses.
The US trade regulator said the company had failed to disclose it had provided the dresses for free and paid each person thousands of dollars.
The firm did not admit wrongdoing.
However, as part of the settlement, it has agreed that in the future any influencers it uses must disclose they have been paid.
It marks the first case of its kind since the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) published guidelines for so-called native advertising last year.
The regulator's complaint said that Lord & Taylor's paid-for Instagram posts reached 11.4 million users over two days and led to its Paisley Asymmetrical Dress "quickly" selling out.
It noted that the "influencers could style the dress any way they chose", but had to include the company's Instagram account handle and use its hashtag - actions that helped the images go viral.
"The company also pre-approved each proposed post," the FTC added.
"In addition... Lord & Taylor did not require the influencers to disclose that the company had compensated them to post the photo, and none of the posts included such a disclosure."
The watchdog also complained that Nylon, a fashion news website, had also posted a photo of the dress on its Instagram account with a caption that Lord & Taylor had reviewed and approved, in addition to a "seemingly objective article" about the piece of clothing, neither of which indicated that they were paid-for ads.
Although the FTC has the power to impose a penalty of up to $16,000 (Â£11,140) for any such violation, Lord & Taylor has not been fined.
However, it has agreed to establish a monitoring and review programme for future endorsement campaigns and must report back to the FTC about its implementation.
The UK's Advertising Standards Authority has already taken action of its own against social media product placements.
In 2014, it reprimanded Oreo-maker Mondelez for contacting vloggers to promote its biscuits without revealing they had been paid to do so.

A US fashion firm has settled a case in which it was accused of failing to flag paid Instagram endorsements as being adverts.

