In this task, you will be presented with a context from an academic paper and a question separated with a 
. You have to answer the question based on the context.

Q: We use Waseem and Hovy BIBREF5, Davidson et al. BIBREF9, and Waseem et al. BIBREF10 as baselines and compare the results with our different fine-tuning strategies using pre-trained BERTbase model.  
 Question: What existing approaches do they compare to?

A: Waseem and Hovy BIBREF5, Davidson et al. BIBREF9, and Waseem et al. BIBREF10
****
Q: The contributions of this work are: 
 Question: Do they look for inconsistencies between different UD treebanks?

A: Yes
****
Q: We would expect that explanation performance should correlate with prediction performance. Since Possible-answer knowledge is primarily needed to decide if the net has enough information to answer the challenge question without guessing and relevant-variable knowledge is needed for the net to know what to query, we analyzed the network's performance on querying and answering separately. The memory network has particular difficulty learning to query relevant variables, reaching only about .5 accuracy when querying. At the same time, it learns to answer very well, reaching over .9 accuracy there. Since these two parts of the interaction are what we ask it to explain in the two modes, we find that the quality of the explanations strongly correlates with the quality of the algorithm executed by the network. 
 Question: How do they measure correlation between the prediction and explanation quality?

A:
They look at the performance accuracy of explanation and the prediction performance
****
