DIALOG:
What did Roy Schafer do after he was no longer teaching?
- He later wrote on psychoanalysis and psychotherapy in works including "Aspects of Internalization" (1968), "A New Language for Psychoanalysis" (1976), "The Analytic Attitude" (1983), "Retelling a Life" (1992), "The Contemporary Kleinians of London" (1997), "Bad Feelings" (2003), "Insight and Interpretation" (2003), and "Tragic Knots in Psychoanalysis" (2009).
- Did he receive any awards or honors for his work?
- He has received many honors, ranging from First Sigmund Freud Memorial Professor University College London (1975-76) to the Outstanding Scientific Achievement Award of the International Psychoanalytic Association (2009). Schafer began to present traditional psychoanalytical concepts not as scientific principles but as interpretative storylines.
- What were some of his other ideas?
- In this view there is no single correct interpretation of a life story; rather, like other narrative constructions, such as poems or novels, the account lends itself to various understandings each of which can legitimately claim to be true while emphasizing another way of looking at it.
- Is there anything else interesting?
- 
Next turn: According to Mitchell's alternative view of Schafer's work, the value of an interpretation lies not in its objectivity or correctness, but in its potential for opening up new forms of experience and allowing the analysand to claim a deeper and broader sense of its own activity.

DIALOG:
What is the worldly doingness of the seemingly worldly?
- Singh terms all such forms of behaviour as "non-worldly", by which he means that while these forms are a part of the world in general, they are not located in the socio-historical, that is, the dialogical world.
- Are there any other interesting aspects about this article?
- In tune with the argument above, Singh makes a distinction between "subjecthood" and "subjectivity".
- What is the distinction between them?
- As per this distinction, subjecthood inheres in the non-dialogical self of the subject, whereas subjectivity represents his/her this worldly/dialogical/socio-historical/instrumental selves.
- Are there any other interesting aspects about this article?
- 
Next turn: As a consequence, subjecthood is in perpetual conflict with subjectivity; it struggles to get rid of the latter—the latter being a creature of the (undesirable) dialogical world.

DIALOG:
What is the cast of The Irishman (2019 film)?
- In October, Gary Basaraba, Anna Paquin, Welker White, and Jesse Plemons joined the cast of the film.
- Are there any other interesting aspects about this article?
- Later, Craig Di Francia and Action Bronson were revealed to have joined the cast.
- Is there anything else significant about the cast?
- Sebastian Maniscalco and Paul Ben-Victor were later revealed as being part of the cast.
- What happen during the production of this film?
- 
Next turn: Filming was originally set to start in August 2017, in and around New York City, and would continue through December 2017.

DIALOG:
What happened in 2006?
- Baird introduced the Conservative government's first piece of legislation in April 2006.
- What was it?
- The "Accountability Act" promised significant reform to the structure of Canadian politics and government.
- Why was it important?
- Prime Minister Harper said that it would "put an end to the influence of money" in the Canadian government.
- What else did you find interesting?
- The "Accountability Act" restricted the ability of former politicians and bureaucrats to become lobbyists, provided protection to whistle-blowers in the civil service and gave the Auditor General of Canada new powers of oversight.
- What other powers did it give the government?
- It limited individual donations to political parties and candidates to $1,100 per year (down from $5,200), created nine new or revised positions to oversee the activities of public officials and placed crown corporations such as the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation under access-to-information legislation.
- Were there any other issues?
- 
Next turn:
Opposition MPs complained that several recommendations for access-to-information reform were omitted from the bill, and were instead sent to committee for further review.