In philosophy, idealism is the group of philosophies which assert that reality, or reality as we can know it, is fundamentally mental, mentally constructed, or otherwise immaterial. Epistemologically, idealism manifests as a skepticism about the possibility of knowing any mind-independent thing. In a sociological sense, idealism emphasizes how human ideas—especially beliefs and values—shape society. As an ontological doctrine, idealism goes further, asserting that all entities are composed of mind or spirit. Idealism thus rejects physicalist and dualist theories that fail to ascribe priority to the mind. 

The earliest extant arguments that the world of experience is grounded in the mental derive from India and Greece. The Hindu idealists in India and the Greek Neoplatonists gave panentheistic arguments for an all-pervading consciousness as the ground or true nature of reality. In contrast, the Yogācāra school, which arose within Mahayana Buddhism in India in the 4th century CE, based its "mind-only" idealism to a greater extent on phenomenological analyses of personal experience. This turn toward the subjective anticipated empiricists such as George Berkeley, who revived idealism in 18th-century Europe by employing skeptical arguments against materialism. What are the answers to this following set of questions: 1. what does Idealism reject?
2. ontologically what does it assert?
3. where did the earliest arguments that experience is mental come from?
4. how does idealism manifest Epistemologically?
5. about what exactly?
6. where did the Yogācāra school come from?
7. who was an empiricists
8. when did he revive idealism in Europe?
9. what is idealism a group of?
10. does idealism shape society?
11. who gave panentheistic arguments for consciousness?
Answer: 1. physicalist and dualist theories
2. that all entities are composed of mind or spirit
3. India and Greece
4. as a skepticism
5. about the possibility of knowing any mind-independent thing
6. within Mahayana Buddhism in India
7. George Berkeley
8. 18th-century
9. philosophies
10. yes
11. The Hindu idealists in India and the Greek Neoplatonists

CHAPTER FOUR 

Babalatchi saw Abdulla pass through the low and narrow entrance into the darkness of Omar's hut; heard them exchange the usual greetings and the distinguished visitor's grave voice asking: "There is no misfortune--please God--but the sight?" and then, becoming aware of the disapproving looks of the two Arabs who had accompanied Abdulla, he followed their example and fell back out of earshot. He did it unwillingly, although he did not ignore that what was going to happen in there was now absolutely beyond his control. He roamed irresolutely about for awhile, and at last wandered with careless steps towards the fire, which had been moved, from under the tree, close to the hut and a little to windward of its entrance. He squatted on his heels and began playing pensively with live embers, as was his habit when engrossed in thought, withdrawing his hand sharply and shaking it above his head when he burnt his fingers in a fit of deeper abstraction. Sitting there he could hear the murmur of the talk inside the hut, and he could distinguish the voices but not the words. Abdulla spoke in deep tones, and now and then this flowing monotone was interrupted by a querulous exclamation, a weak moan or a plaintive quaver of the old man. Yes. It was annoying not to be able to make out what they were saying, thought Babalatchi, as he sat gazing fixedly at the unsteady glow of the fire. But it will be right. All will be right. Abdulla inspired him with confidence. He came up fully to his expectation. From the very first moment when he set his eye on him he felt sure that this man--whom he had known by reputation only--was very resolute. Perhaps too resolute. Perhaps he would want to grasp too much later on. A shadow flitted over Babalatchi's face. On the eve of the accomplishment of his desires he felt the bitter taste of that drop of doubt which is mixed with the sweetness of every success.  What are the answers to this following set of questions: 1. Was there misfortune?
2. Who passed through the entrance?
3. Into where?
4. Who's hut?
5. Was the entrance narrow?
6. Who saw him?
7. Who accompanied Abdulla?
8. How many?
9. Where did he roam towards?
10. Had it been moved?
11. From where?
12. To where?
13. What body part did he burn?
14. What was he interrupted by?
15. Who gave out a weak moan, or plaintive quiver?
Answer: 1. no
2. Abdulla
3. into a hut
4. Omar's
5. yes
6. Babalatchi
7. some Arabs
8. two
9. a fire
10. yes
11. from under a tree
12. close to the hut
13. his fingers
14. unknown
15. Omar

(CNN) -- Robert Zimmerman Jr., the brother of the man who shot and killed 17-year-old Trayvon Martin, apologized for his controversial and offensive tweets. 

In one, Zimmerman juxtaposed a photograph of Martin with one of 17-year-old De'Marquise Elkins, one of two teenagers charged with killing a baby in Georgia. 

Both Elkins and Martin appear to be flipping off the camera. 

"A picture speaks a thousand words. Any questions?" the tweet reads. 

In another tweet, Zimmerman writes: "Lib media shld ask if what these2 black teens did 2 a woman&baby is the reason ppl think blacks mightB risky." 

Speaking on CNN's Piers Morgan Live on Wednesday night, he apologized for the messages, saying they weren't the "right thing to do." 

"I realize those were controversial and offensive and I did publicly apologize for them," he said. "I'm a human being. I'm being upfront about what I did. I made a mistake ... Unfortunately (it) may not have helped George." 

5 things to know about the case 

His brother, George Zimmerman, has been charged with second-degree murder. Zimmerman acknowledged shooting Martin but said it was in self-defense. Attorneys for Martin's family have accused Zimmerman of racially profiling Martin and shooting him "in cold blood." 

Robert Zimmerman Jr. said he was trying to make a larger point in his tweets about the "media and their honesty in portraying the person who encountered my brother February 26, 2012. 

Letters to Zimmerman show split opinions 

"We've been led to believe that it's a junior-high-school-aged person because of the pictures," he said, referring to Martin.  What are the answers to this following set of questions: 1. How old was Trayvon Martin?
2. What happened to him?
3. Did he survive?
4. Who apologized for his tweets?
5. Who is he related to?
6. What are Elkins and Martin doing?
7. What is the charge in the case?
8. What shoe did the tweeter appear on?
9. What is George Zimmerman charged with?
10. Did he admit he had done it?
11. Did he say it was self defense?
12. When did the shooting occur?
Answer:
1. 17.
2. He was shot.
3. No.
4. Robert Zimmerman Jr.
5. George Zimmerman.
6. Flipping off the camera.
7. Killing a baby.
8. Piers Morgan Live.
9. Second-degree murder.
10. Yes.
11. Yes.
12. 2012.