In this task, you will be presented with a context from an academic paper and a question separated with a 
. You have to answer the question based on the context.

[Q]: Level B categorizes the type of offense and two labels are used: targeted (TIN) and untargeted (INT) insults and threats.

Targeted Insult (TIN): Posts which contain an insult/threat to an individual, group, or others (see next layer);

Untargeted (UNT): Posts containing non-targeted profanity and swearing. Posts with general profanity are not targeted, but they contain non-acceptable language. Level C categorizes the targets of insults and threats as individual (IND), group (GRP), and other (OTH).

Individual (IND): Posts targeting an individual. It can be a a famous person, a named individual or an unnamed participant in the conversation. Insults and threats targeted at individuals are often defined as cyberbulling.

Group (GRP): The target of these offensive posts is a group of people considered as a unity due to the same ethnicity, gender or sexual orientation, political affiliation, religious belief, or other common characteristic. Many of the insults and threats targeted at a group correspond to what is commonly understood as hate speech.

Other (OTH): The target of these offensive posts does not belong to any of the previous two categories (e.g. an organization, a situation, an event, or an issue). 
 Question: What kinds of offensive content are explored?
[A]: non-targeted profanity and swearing, targeted insults such as cyberbullying, offensive content related to ethnicity, gender or sexual orientation, political affiliation, religious belief, and anything belonging to hate speech


[Q]: What is the impact of pre-trained representations with less transcribed data? In order to get a better understanding of this, we train acoustic models with different amounts of labeled training data and measure accuracy with and without pre-trained representations (log-mel filterbanks). The pre-trained representations are trained on the full Librispeech corpus and we measure accuracy in terms of WER when decoding with a 4-gram language model. Figure shows that pre-training reduces WER by 32% on nov93dev when only about eight hours of transcribed data is available. Pre-training only on the audio data of WSJ ( WSJ) performs worse compared to the much larger Librispeech ( Libri). This further confirms that pre-training on more data is crucial to good performance. 
 Question: Do they explore how much traning data is needed for which magnitude of improvement for WER? 
[A]: Yes


[Q]: We re-implement the model proposed in BIBREF3, and use it as a baseline for our problem. The rationale behind choosing this particular model as a baseline is it's proven good predictive performance on multilingual text classification. 
 Question: What is their baseline model?
[A]:
the model proposed in BIBREF3


