Problem: Choose the next sentence
By Chris Parsons and Suzannah Hills PUBLISHED: 07:03 EST, 28 April 2012 | UPDATED: 01:49 EST, 30 April 2012 On the run: Chen Guangcheng is thought to have been helped in his escape from his home, which has angered Chinese authorities A blind Chinese activist who dodged 100 guards to escape house arrest is believed to have taken refuge at the U.S. Embassy. Chen Guangcheng, 40, had been under heavy guard at his house in Dongshigu village, in Shandong province southeast of Beijing, after exposing forced abortions as part of China's one-child policy. But after serving four years in prison and then being confined to his home, the self-schooled lawyer is said to have fled from the authorities despite more than one hundred guards watching his village and is now believed to be at the U.S. Embassy.

is under

OPTIONS:
- Beijing protection and high level talks are currently under way
- Chen Gaungcheng protection and high level talks are currently under way
- Chen Guangcheng protection and high level talks are currently under way
- China protection and high level talks are currently under way
- Chinese protection and high level talks are currently under way
- Chris Parsons protection and high level talks are currently under way
- Dongshigu protection and high level talks are currently under way
- Shandong protection and high level talks are currently under way
- Suzannah Hills protection and high level talks are currently under way
- U.S. protection and high level talks are currently under way

Answer: U.S. protection and high level talks are currently under way


Problem: Choose the next sentence
They could have lost Daniel Sturridge it would not have been irreparable. Jordan Henderson the same; maybe even Steven Gerrard. But not him. The moment it became plain that Luis Suarez’s future in English football was untenable, handling life without a player who close to propelled Liverpool to a first league title of the modern era, was going to take all the skill Brendan Rodgers and his boardroom financiers could muster. The same task has eaten up three managers in a year at Tottenham Hotspur, and they are still no further forward. Managers will say that it is good business to lose one stellar name and rebuild a team. Yes, but there are exceptions. When that player is so far above the rest it makes compensatory dealing close to impossible. That is what Tottenham have found, losing Gareth Bale. Liverpool are now facing the same painful facts post-Suarez.



OPTIONS:
- AC Milan’s struggles should have served as a warning, not a blueprint.
- Balotelli’s struggles should have served as a warning, not a blueprint.
- Brendan Rodgers’s struggles should have served as a warning, not a blueprint.
- Daniel Sturridge’s struggles should have served as a warning, not a blueprint.
- England’s struggles should have served as a warning, not a blueprint.
- English’s struggles should have served as a warning, not a blueprint.
- Gareth Bale’s struggles should have served as a warning, not a blueprint.
- Italian’s struggles should have served as a warning, not a blueprint.
- Jordan Henderson’s struggles should have served as a warning, not a blueprint.
- Liverpool’s struggles should have served as a warning, not a blueprint.
- Ludogorets’s struggles should have served as a warning, not a blueprint.
- Luis Suarez’s struggles should have served as a warning, not a blueprint.
- Manchester City’s struggles should have served as a warning, not a blueprint.
- Mario Balotelli’s struggles should have served as a warning, not a blueprint.
- Real Madrid’s struggles should have served as a warning, not a blueprint.
- Steven Gerrard’s struggles should have served as a warning, not a blueprint.
- Tottenham’s struggles should have served as a warning, not a blueprint.
- Tottenham Hotspur’s struggles should have served as a warning, not a blueprint.
- post-Suarez’s struggles should have served as a warning, not a blueprint.

Answer: Tottenham’s struggles should have served as a warning, not a blueprint.


Problem: Choose the next sentence
By Eddie Wrenn PUBLISHED: 07:58 EST, 10 April 2012 | UPDATED: 03:33 EST, 11 April 2012 This satellite view shows the area of Political Prison Camp 15 in Yodok, North Korea, where 150,000 inmates are allegedly kept More than 150,000 North Koreans remain incarcerated in a Soviet-style, hidden 'gulag' despite the communist government's denial it holds political prisoners. The shocking claim is made in a report released today by the U.S.-based Committee for Human Rights in North Korea, and is based on interviews with 60 former prisoners and guards. It includes satellite images of what are described as prison labor camps and penitentiaries.

The report says the camp system was initially modeled in the 1950s on the

OPTIONS:
- Committee for Human Rights in North Korea gulag, to punish 'wrong thinkers' and those belonging to the 'wrong political class' or religious persuasion.
- Eddie Wrenn gulag, to punish 'wrong thinkers' and those belonging to the 'wrong political class' or religious persuasion.
- Google Earth gulag, to punish 'wrong thinkers' and those belonging to the 'wrong political class' or religious persuasion.
- North Korea gulag, to punish 'wrong thinkers' and those belonging to the 'wrong political class' or religious persuasion.
- North Koreans gulag, to punish 'wrong thinkers' and those belonging to the 'wrong political class' or religious persuasion.
- Political Prison Camp 15 gulag, to punish 'wrong thinkers' and those belonging to the 'wrong political class' or religious persuasion.
- Soviet gulag, to punish 'wrong thinkers' and those belonging to the 'wrong political class' or religious persuasion.
- U.S. gulag, to punish 'wrong thinkers' and those belonging to the 'wrong political class' or religious persuasion.
- UPDATED gulag, to punish 'wrong thinkers' and those belonging to the 'wrong political class' or religious persuasion.
- Whole gulag, to punish 'wrong thinkers' and those belonging to the 'wrong political class' or religious persuasion.
- Yodok gulag, to punish 'wrong thinkers' and those belonging to the 'wrong political class' or religious persuasion.

Answer:
Soviet gulag, to punish 'wrong thinkers' and those belonging to the 'wrong political class' or religious persuasion.