Question:
Based on the premise "Bonifacio", can we conclude that "Visit Bonifacio for free."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
it is not possible to tell


Question: Sentence A: Tripp to wear a wire and then used its fruits to get permission to widen his investigation.

Sentence B: Tripp did not have an investigation or get permission to grow it.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no


Question: Wander, at your own risk, among the walls, crumbling turrets, and caves, and look out toward the surrounding islands of Mykonos and Andros.
The crumbling architecture and aesthetic is risky and appreciated. 
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell


Problem: Here is a premise:
These requirements include the reasons for the collection of the information, the type of information and an estimate of the burden imposed on respondents.

Here is a hypothesis:
The information has no requirements. 

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no


Sentence 1: My security clearance was shaky at best, but the guards knew who I was.

Sentence 2: The guards knew I was allowed in.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: it is not possible to tell


Premise:
"that he was using to fire the process in order to run it"
Hypothesis: He only ran the process once a month.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no


it is not possible to tell