Question:
Based on the premise "So I thought, having asked for an A.B.C.", can we conclude that "I talked to the man next to me who got an A.B.C."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
no
Question: Sentence A: The reasoning is that competitive pressure brings about productive efficiency, efficient price structures, product innovation, and the elimination of economic rents.

Sentence B: The pressure makes things fall apart, not work better.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: no
Question: The Republicans' anti-immigrant agenda , which was aggressively covered by the growing Spanish-speaking media, had much to do with it.
The Spanish-speaking media reported on the Republicans' opposition to immigration.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes
Problem: Here is a premise:
uh-huh with an annuity

Here is a hypothesis:
Yes, with an annuity

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes
Sentence 1: For example, an audit cannot create certainty in an environment where there is no certainty.

Sentence 2: Audits always create certainty 
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: no
Premise:
"If you believe that the trust fund is an accounting fiction (the government borrowing from itself, paying itself interest, and writing checks that are government commitments irrespective of the fund), then the transaction is a total wash."
Hypothesis: The trust fund may not be fiction.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no


no