Problem: (CNN) -- Zlatan Ibrahimovic produced a memorable performance after his four-goal salvo helped Sweden defeat England in Stockholm. 

The 31-year-old, who has scored ten goals in as many games for club side Paris Saint-Germain, was on fire once again as Roy Hodgson's men were swept away. 

The Swedish skipper had given his side a 20th minute lead before goals from Manchester United's Danny Welbeck and Tottenham's Steven Caulker gave England a half-time. 

Ibrahimovic arrival marks watershed moment for Paris Saint-Germain 

But it was Ibrahimovic who stole the show after the interval, with three strikes in the final 12 minutes. 

After netting a 78th minute equaliser, Ibrahimovic slammed home a rasping 30-yard free-kick before rounding off his night with a scarcely believable scissors kick. 

It ruined the night for England captain Steven Gerrard, who had hoped to celebrate his 100th cap with victory. 

Gerrard told ITV 1: "I still stick by Zinedine Zidane, he is the best player in the world as the best player of his generation, but his (Ibrahimovic's) performance was world class and he just scored one of the best goals I seen live. 

"It was his night. If someone scores four goals and the way he scored them....it's one of the best I've seen." 

Hodgson added: "The fourth goal was extraordinary, but it was the second and third goals which cost us. 

"For 70 minutes we were playing very well and we deserved to be in the lead, but we made changes and they took the initiative." 

Elsewhere, France recorded an impressive 2-1 victory over Italy after it came from behind in Parma. 
1. WHo produced a performance?
2. after what>?
3. did they win?
4. who did they beat?
5. where?
6. What was his nationality?
7. how old was he?
8. What did Ibrahimovic do?
9. how?
10. what happened the last 12 minutes?
Answer: 1. Zlatan Ibrahimovic
2. his four-goal salvo
3. yes
4. England
5. Stockholm.
6. Swedish
7. 31
8. stole the show
9. 30-yard free-kick
10. three strikes i

Problem: CHAPTER 65 

Lady St. Jerome was much interested in the accounts which the cardinal and Lothair gave her of their excursions in the city and their visits. 

"It is very true," she said, "I never knew such good people; and they ought to be; so favored by Heaven, and leading a life which, if any thing earthly can, must give them, however faint, some foretaste of our joys hereafter. Did your eminence visit the Pellegrini?" This was the hospital, where Miss Arundel had found Lothair. 

The cardinal looked grave. "No," he replied. "My object was to secure for our young friend some interesting but not agitating distraction from certain ideas which, however admirable and transcendently important, are nevertheless too high and profound to permit their constant contemplation with impunity to our infirm natures. Besides," he added, in a lower, but still distinct tone, "I was myself unwilling to visit in a mere casual manner the scene of what I must consider the greatest event of this century." 

"But you have been there?" inquired Lady St. Jerome. 

His eminence crossed himself. 

In the course of the evening Monsignore Catesby told Lothair that a grand service was about to be celebrated in the church of St. George: thanks were to be offered to the Blessed Virgin by Miss Arundel for the miraculous mercy vouchsafed to her in saving the life of a countryman, Lothair. "All her friends will make a point of being there," added the monsignore, "even the Protestants and some Russians. Miss Arundel was very unwilling at first to fulfil this office, but the Holy Father has commanded it. I know that nothing will induce her to ask you to attend; and yet, if I were you, I would turn it over in your mind. I know she said that she would sooner that you were present than all her English friends together. However, you can think about it. One likes to do what is proper." 
1. what was going to happen at st george's?
2. who mentioned it?
3. Who was interested in the stories the cardinal and Lothair had?
4. what type of folks did she never know?
5. what reward should they have?
6. where was Lothair found?
7. why by?
8. who  is she giving thanks to for his rescue?
9. where will her friends be?
10. even people of different faiths?
11. which are mentioned?
12. and?
13. of everyone, who would the lady rather have there?
14. was instructed to go, or told to think about it?
15. did Miss Arundel want to ask him herself?
16. Why did the priest take Lothair to the city?
17. from?
18. was there another reason?
19. did he ever answer the question about going to the hosipital
Answer: 1. A grand service
2. Monsignore Catesby
3. Lady St. Jerome
4. Such good people
5. Some foretaste of our joys hereafter
6. A hospital
7. Miss Arundel
8. Miss Arundel
9. The church of St. George
10. Yes
11. the Protestants
12. Some Russians
13. Lothair
14. To think about it.
15. No
16. To secure some interesting but not agitating distraction
17. Certain ideas
18. No
19. Yes

Problem: CHAPTER XVII 

Wingate, after several strenuous hours spent in Slate's office, returned to his rooms late that night, to find Peter Phipps awaiting him. There was something vaguely threatening about the bulky figure of the man standing gloomily upon the hearth rug, all the spurious good nature gone from his face, his brows knitted, his cheeks hanging a little and unusually pale. Wingate paused on the threshold of the room and his hand crept into his pocket. Phipps seemed to notice the gesture and shook his head. 

"Nothing quite so crude, Wingate," he said. "I know an enemy when I see one, but I wasn't thinking of getting rid of you that way." 

"I have found it necessary," Wingate remarked slowly, "to be prepared for all sorts of tricks when I am up against anybody as conscienceless as you. I don't want you here, Phipps. I didn't ask you to come and see me. I've nothing to discuss with you." 

"There are times," Phipps replied, "when the issue which cannot be fought out to the end with arms can be joined in the council chamber. I have come to know your terms." 

Wingate shook his head. 

"I don't understand. It is too soon for this sort of thing. You are not beaten yet." 

"I am tired," his visitor muttered. "May I sit down?" 

"You are an unwelcome guest," Wingate replied coldly, "but sit if you will. Then say what you have to say and go." 

Phipps sank into an easy-chair. It was obvious that he was telling the truth so far as regarded his fatigue. He seemed to have aged ten years. 
1. Who returned to his room?
2. When?
3. After what?
4. Spent where?
5. Who was waiting in his room?
6. Where was he standing?
7. Was he threatening?
8. What was his body type?
9. Was he pale?
10. Did he want him there?
11. How much had Phipps aged?
12. Did he have a seat?
13. Where?
14. Why?
15. Was he beaten yet?
16. Was Wingate prepared?
17. Did his hand go into his pocket?
18. To retrieve what?
19. Does he have anything to discuss with his visitor?
Answer:
1. Wingate
2. Late that night
3. several strenuous hours
4. Slate's office
5. Peter Phipps
6. hearth rug
7. Yes
8. bulky
9. Yes
10. No
11. ten years
12. Yes
13. easy-chair
14. he was tired
15. No
16. Yes
17. Yes
18. unknown
19. No