Question:
Based on the premise "Fertilizer runoff from the Mississippi River has killed sea life over an area the size of New Jersey in the Gulf of Mexico, says an article. Farmers are resisting calls to curtail fertilizer use.", can we conclude that "Fertilizer that leaked into the Mississippi River has not killed sea life."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
no
Question: Sentence A: Porto-Vecchio

Sentence B: Porto-Vecchio is the most famous.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell
Question: And for genuine activism.
Genuine activism is most noble.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell
Problem: Here is a premise:
He wanted mightily to accumulate money, but he worried constantly about breaking the moral code against covetous behavior.

Here is a hypothesis:
Even though he thought wanting a lot of money was covetous, he still worked hard and earned a good income.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell
Sentence 1: The minarets that you see in the foreground belong to two important Islamic buildings.

Sentence 2: Those minarets in the foreground are part of two important Islamic buildings
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: yes
Premise:
"Therefore, the impact of the rule varies based on the type of business and its place in the chain of production and distribution."
Hypothesis: This rule has little to no impact at all, with no real exceptions or variances.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no


no