Question:
Based on the premise "Perhaps the uncritical reportage of Fitzsimmons' new story can be explained by pangs of guilt about the uncritical reportage of his old one.", can we conclude that "Fitzsimmons' new story is due to guilt over the first story he published."? OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
****
Answer:
it is not possible to tell


Question: Sentence A: I changed my mind, and you should notice, you spent 150 thousand dollars on it.'

Sentence B: You spend a lot of money on it.

If sentence A is true, how about sentence B?
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes


Question: Who delivers what type of intervention
Different people give different interventions.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: it is not possible to tell


Problem: Here is a premise:
They have been drugged and brainwashed into thinking that they are doing exactly what they want, not what some dictator wants them to do.

Here is a hypothesis:
The dictator is often good at brainwashing his populace.

Here are the options: OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no

Answer: yes


Sentence 1: Still, if the relative freshness of Watergate works against Clinton, the enormity of it works in his favor.

Sentence 2: Clinton is prepared for both of the Watergate's effects.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no
Is this second sentence entailed by the first?

Answer: it is not possible to tell


Premise:
"Republican strategists will make Democrats carry that burden into the elections."
Hypothesis: Republican strategists will push that burden onto the Democrats.
OPTIONS:
- yes
- it is not possible to tell
- no


yes