instruction:
In this task, you will be presented with a context from an academic paper and a question separated with a 
. You have to answer the question based on the context.
question:
Our training data consists of 2.09M sentence pairs extracted from LDC corpus. To test different approaches on Chinese-to-English translation task, we use NIST 2003(MT03) dataset as the validation set, and NIST 2004(MT04), NIST 2005(MT05), NIST 2006(MT06) datasets as our test sets. For English-to-Chinese translation task, we also use NIST 2003(MT03) dataset as the validation set, and NIST 2008(MT08) will be used as test set. 
 Question: What dataset did they use?
answer:
LDC corpus NIST 2003(MT03) NIST 2004(MT04), NIST 2005(MT05), NIST 2006(MT06) NIST 2008(MT08)


question:
TABREF5 displays the output behavior of models that we damaged to resemble the damage that causes aphasia. Because the output languages in all of our domains use tokens to represent meanings in many cases, it is expected that the analog to Wernicke's area is responsible for maintaining a high precision. 
 Question: Do they perform a quantitative analysis of their model displaying knowledge distortions?
answer:
Yes


question:
They used 20-million-words data randomly sampled from the raw text released by the CoNLL 2017 Shared Task - Automatically Annotated Raw Texts and Word Embeddings BIBREF8, which is a combination of Wikipedia dump and common crawl.  For example, we compared the Latvian model by ELMoForManyLangs with a model we trained on a complete (wikidump + common crawl) Latvian corpus, which has about 280 million tokens. 
 Question: How larger are the training sets of these versions of ELMo compared to the previous ones?
answer:

By 14 times.


